could you write or record power supply current and voltage and hho flow of production, also cell temperature rise after x passed time. I thinkered with Mayers claims 15years ago but didn't get more than classic electrolysis would do. keep the good work!
I don't understand why people think there's some kind of resonance with water under these conditions. The only thing you're doing is impedance matching, and that's very different from resonance. To vibrate a water molecule, you will need at least 1 GHZ frequency, but that doesn't separate the individual atoms.. To separate the individual atoms, you probably need multiple harmonic frequencies at extremely high frequencies at the GHZ range. This can become complicated very quick.
@@kentinousss6 Stan Meyer never showed the amount of output his device can produce. Many people tried to replicate those claims and have never succeeded.
btw, the diode suggestion from earlier made the bjt fry... I think it's because that coil HAS to be charged first between pulses BEFORE going to the water cap. If the water charges first, the coil may never induct, overloading the bjt collector or the timing is off. Could be wrong about that. Today I was also able to increase the resonance voltage oscillations from 80v to 130v by adding a bifiler rod at the negative lead, and it costed no additional power. Not on this video, but upcoming
@@weighta6630 gotta break a few eggs to make an ommlette, good work getting more voltage. i suppose the next place to go is pulse train instead of constant pulsing
@@m3sca1 Lol. I gated it today as well, but the oscillating decays were non-existent, and the step charge doesn't happen with my circuit. It just looks like a genuine gating-on, gating-off. One of the obvious reasons is because the tank circuit is DC, not AC, and the only practicality of resonance here is that it's barely completing a single oscillation because of the blocking diode. When the inductor collapses, the polarity reverses every time, as it should. It's possible that an AC cap in parallel BEFORE the diode with the same capacitance of the cell would fix this, and the voltage would be at it's best, but not sure on that. i.imgur.com/34ule8q.png
![Twenty One Pilots - “The Line” (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/E2Rj2gQAyPA/mqdefault.jpg)
very nice. can you show the actual circuit like the title suggest. thanks
could you write or record power supply current and voltage and hho flow of production, also cell temperature rise after x passed time. I thinkered with Mayers claims 15years ago but didn't get more than classic electrolysis would do. keep the good work!
I don't understand why people think there's some kind of resonance with water under these conditions. The only thing you're doing is impedance matching, and that's very different from resonance. To vibrate a water molecule, you will need at least 1 GHZ frequency, but that doesn't separate the individual atoms.. To separate the individual atoms, you probably need multiple harmonic frequencies at extremely high frequencies at the GHZ range. This can become complicated very quick.
I show the Stan Meyer video, it was about 20khz,
@@kentinousss6
Stan Meyer never showed the amount of output his device can produce. Many people tried to replicate those claims and have never succeeded.
the 17x was more about explosive power than volumetric production. nobody will ever replicate what he was saying because it was taken out of context
Those spikes indicate you have very hard water. "Heavy water" is what you really want.
👍
btw, the diode suggestion from earlier made the bjt fry... I think it's because that coil HAS to be charged first between pulses BEFORE going to the water cap. If the water charges first, the coil may never induct, overloading the bjt collector or the timing is off. Could be wrong about that. Today I was also able to increase the resonance voltage oscillations from 80v to 130v by adding a bifiler rod at the negative lead, and it costed no additional power. Not on this video, but upcoming
@@weighta6630 gotta break a few eggs to make an ommlette, good work getting more voltage. i suppose the next place to go is pulse train instead of constant pulsing
@@m3sca1 Lol. I gated it today as well, but the oscillating decays were non-existent, and the step charge doesn't happen with my circuit. It just looks like a genuine gating-on, gating-off. One of the obvious reasons is because the tank circuit is DC, not AC, and the only practicality of resonance here is that it's barely completing a single oscillation because of the blocking diode. When the inductor collapses, the polarity reverses every time, as it should. It's possible that an AC cap in parallel BEFORE the diode with the same capacitance of the cell would fix this, and the voltage would be at it's best, but not sure on that. i.imgur.com/34ule8q.png
@@weighta6630 worth a try
@@weighta6630 lo ngomong apaan dah?
Gw ga ngerti... kocak bat dah...🤭