Il a grand besoin d'une belle rénovation ce char ,B1 . C'est du patrimoine qui aurait besoin d'être mis en valeur vu cette bataille qu'ils à mené jadis.
1930s French tanks are pretty unique-they have a "Flash Gordon" look to them that I like. Actually, they were better than German tanks of the day-but the French did not employ them (in the way that DeGaulle wanted to). Hence they were not as effective as they should have been.
", they were better than German tanks of the day-but the French did not employ them (in the way that DeGaulle wanted to)" This view of history is absolutly wrong, it denies the facts and the talks of soldiers who fought with those tanks. The tanks were bad, you can't use a tank designed for a task in an other task... a tractor would never win a race against Formula 1, it's not designed to... It's the same for french tanks. De Gaulle was not the light of the Universe. His writings were partials, not technically serious and full of romantism. For more: french actually DID armored divisions: the DLM, and 2 DLM were grouped in a ARMORED CORPS in 1937 ! So the legend "fench tanks were good, only the use were bad... De Gaulle understood but were not listened" is a non sense and a falsification of history.
frenchies had almost all wrong... a tank means almost nothing if it is unable to know what to do.. communication was really bad too.. good armor without radio.. for instance..french lost fairly rapidly and no shame to have facing enemy with superior strategy and tactics.. ( Ussr was saved by it huge area) .. ..but the problem for france was not fighting until the end..especially facing evil.
@@BFVK realy stupid answer from a guy who known nothing about tanks and even less at history, specialy concerning the colonel de Gaulle, but the germans who read he's books (witten before the war between 1932 and 1940) understand very well...the Colonel de Gaulle apply he's idea with success during he's command from the 4° cuirasse division, but was unable to win alone wit the worst command from ww2: first the arrogant and incompetent general Gamelin and second the defeatist and incompetent general Weygand and in finish the traitor, marechal Petain
comment est ce qu'on peut laisser un char se dégrader ainsi, même chose à dijon ou un char est exposé, laissé à l'abandon alors que c'est un témoignage et que son équipage a été tué en 44 lors de la reconquete
Tous chars provenant de ou avant la deuxième guerre mondiale qui existe encore aujourd'hui sont tous dans des musées. Ils ont une importante valeur historique et sont beaucoup trop vieux et obsolet pour les champs de battailles d'aujourd'hui.
@@kiraxxxxxxxxx Dans ce cas la, une voiture blindée fera mieux car c'est plus léger, rapide et n'endomagera pas l'asphalte. Ou, au pire, un char plus moderne peut être utilisé vue que certains ont des chenilles fait partiellement de caoutchouc ce qui n'arachera pas les rues.
![Stromae, Pomme - “Ma Meilleure Ennemie” (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Visualizer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1F3OGIFnW1k/mqdefault.jpg)
Il a grand besoin d'une belle rénovation ce char ,B1 . C'est du patrimoine qui aurait besoin d'être mis en valeur vu cette bataille qu'ils à mené jadis.
1930s French tanks are pretty unique-they have a "Flash Gordon" look to them that I like. Actually, they were better than German tanks of the day-but the French did not employ them (in the way that DeGaulle wanted to). Hence they were not as effective as they should have been.
", they were better than German tanks of the day-but the French did not employ them (in the way that DeGaulle wanted to)"
This view of history is absolutly wrong, it denies the facts and the talks of soldiers who fought with those tanks.
The tanks were bad, you can't use a tank designed for a task in an other task... a tractor would never win a race against Formula 1, it's not designed to... It's the same for french tanks.
De Gaulle was not the light of the Universe. His writings were partials, not technically serious and full of romantism.
For more: french actually DID armored divisions: the DLM, and 2 DLM were grouped in a ARMORED CORPS in 1937 !
So the legend "fench tanks were good, only the use were bad... De Gaulle understood but were not listened" is a non sense and a falsification of history.
frenchies had almost all wrong... a tank means almost nothing if it is unable to know what to do.. communication was really bad too.. good armor without radio.. for instance..french lost fairly rapidly and no shame to have facing enemy with superior strategy and tactics.. ( Ussr was saved by it huge area) .. ..but the problem for france was not fighting until the end..especially facing evil.
@@BFVK I have been trying to obtain a copy of De Gaulle's book (in English)-nobody seems to have a copy.
@@BFVK realy stupid answer from a guy who known nothing about tanks and even less at history, specialy concerning the colonel de Gaulle, but the germans who read he's books (witten before the war between 1932 and 1940) understand very well...the Colonel de Gaulle apply he's idea with success during he's command from the 4° cuirasse division, but was unable to win alone wit the worst command from ww2: first the arrogant and incompetent general Gamelin and second the defeatist and incompetent general Weygand and in finish the traitor, marechal Petain
@@genekelly8467 de Gaulle did write several books between 1932 and 1940 ,and after war he's memories
Amazeing tank for her time and very advanced ! Its my fav french tank to this very day!
toujours sympa les vidéos ;)
À Stonne, les Allemands ont su rapidement immobiliser les chars B1 en tirant sur le côté.
comment est ce qu'on peut laisser un char se dégrader ainsi, même chose à dijon ou un char est exposé, laissé à l'abandon alors que c'est un témoignage et que son équipage a été tué en 44 lors de la reconquete
Time to give that tank a little T.L.C..🤨
il en reste toujours des réserves en france!?
Si je ne me trompe pas, le dernier B1 bis fonctionnel se trouve au musée des blindés, à Saumure.
Saumur tout les chars sont fonctionnel a part les endommagé comme le jagdpanzer et la reprise du char leclerc
Tous chars provenant de ou avant la deuxième guerre mondiale qui existe encore aujourd'hui sont tous dans des musées. Ils ont une importante valeur historique et sont beaucoup trop vieux et obsolet pour les champs de battailles d'aujourd'hui.
@@warpey5632oui mais utiles faces aux syndicats et grévistes malgré tout... donc autant en faire bon usage.
@@kiraxxxxxxxxx Dans ce cas la, une voiture blindée fera mieux car c'est plus léger, rapide et n'endomagera pas l'asphalte. Ou, au pire, un char plus moderne peut être utilisé vue que certains ont des chenilles fait partiellement de caoutchouc ce qui n'arachera pas les rues.
il faut le donner aux ukrainiens..................
Un char de plus de 80 ans dans un champ de battaille moderne?
@@warpey5632 🥱