Please state references to these claims. If you do choose to reference scholars, please do not state unknown ashari scholars, stick to Imam nawawi or Imam ghazali or others who are known. Barakallah feek.
Al Ghazali innovated a lot within Islam. How can you mix philopsphy with Islam while the Salaf warned harshly against philosophy? The Asharis have 1000s of difference opinions they between themselfs so much. They reach stages in their live while they continuesly change their opinion. While ahlul Sunnah stick to one opinion from the beginning till we die. That Allah is above the arsh in reality, has hands, has a face, hears. Not like the Ashari who "hearing means that he has an ear, and that means that you likened Allah to the creator". And we say no, read the books of the Salaf, the Salaf all affirmed this. But Asharis reject the books of the Salaf despite knowing they are 100% authentic. Their books are not filled with ayaat and ahadith. Their evidance is their 'aql. No wonder why every graveworshipper is either and Ashari or Maaturidi
Al Ghazali innovated a lot within Islam. How can you mix philopsphy with Islam while the Salaf warned harshly against philosophy? The Asharis have 1000s of difference opinions they between themselfs so much. They reach stages in their live while they continuesly change their opinion. While ahlul Sunnah stick to one opinion from the beginning till we die. That Allah is above the arsh in reality, has hands, has a face, hears. Not like the Ashari who "hearing means that he has an ear, and that means that you likened Allah to the creator". And we say no, read the books of the Salaf, the Salaf all affirmed this. But Asharis reject the books of the Salaf despite knowing they are 100% authentic. Their books are not filled with ayaat and ahadith. Their evidance is their 'aql. No wonder why every graveworshipper is either and Ashari or Maaturidi
جزاك الله خيراً
Please state references to these claims. If you do choose to reference scholars, please do not state unknown ashari scholars, stick to Imam nawawi or Imam ghazali or others who are known. Barakallah feek.
Al Ghazali innovated a lot within Islam. How can you mix philopsphy with Islam while the Salaf warned harshly against philosophy? The Asharis have 1000s of difference opinions they between themselfs so much. They reach stages in their live while they continuesly change their opinion. While ahlul Sunnah stick to one opinion from the beginning till we die. That Allah is above the arsh in reality, has hands, has a face, hears. Not like the Ashari who "hearing means that he has an ear, and that means that you likened Allah to the creator". And we say no, read the books of the Salaf, the Salaf all affirmed this. But Asharis reject the books of the Salaf despite knowing they are 100% authentic. Their books are not filled with ayaat and ahadith. Their evidance is their 'aql. No wonder why every graveworshipper is either and Ashari or Maaturidi
Al Ghazali innovated a lot within Islam. How can you mix philopsphy with Islam while the Salaf warned harshly against philosophy? The Asharis have 1000s of difference opinions they between themselfs so much. They reach stages in their live while they continuesly change their opinion. While ahlul Sunnah stick to one opinion from the beginning till we die. That Allah is above the arsh in reality, has hands, has a face, hears. Not like the Ashari who "hearing means that he has an ear, and that means that you likened Allah to the creator". And we say no, read the books of the Salaf, the Salaf all affirmed this. But Asharis reject the books of the Salaf despite knowing they are 100% authentic. Their books are not filled with ayaat and ahadith. Their evidance is their 'aql. No wonder why every graveworshipper is either and Ashari or Maaturidi