All of these anti-Marilyn vos Savant comments are pretty immature. She has an IQ of 220. Get over it. An IQ is a statistic. She's not a narcissist. It's not like she's waving a flag saying, "My IQ is 220". It's not like she's considered a bigger genius than Einstein. She's just giving an interview in which she presents ideas and opinions. Why all the immature comments? Why the like-to-dislike ratio? Stupid.
She doesn't really have an IQ of 220: You can't accurate determine IQ above 180. Arguably above 160. Such figures are based on speculation, actually, and there are various forms of IQ and ways to trick people to think you have an iq higher than you actually have by using higher forms of IQ and presenting it as the normal score.
MinamuTV 'She's not a narcissist. It's not like she's waving a flag saying, "My IQ is 220". ' Well she wasn't asked on for her cosmetics and bare legs.
perenceja . You are correct. She does not need to nor does she "wave" anything. That woman is a national treasure, a world treasure, in fact. And truly an absolutely magnificent beauty. And magnificent in more ways than one . . .
She's right. Motivation is tremendously important. And motivation is not necessarily tied to 'intelligence'. There are other factors of course. When discussing people of high IQ, its a mistake to assume that just because you are six foot eight, you are a basketball player.
Perhaps the fact that she is beautiful (and incredibly smart) intimidates some people. If someone like Marilyn is considered a "fraud" then I submit that this world desperately needs more "frauds" like her!
In a prior interview she mentions the way that she was recognized for her IQ which was the omni book with a test that was administered to a small group and she had the highest score. Her IQ is closer to 150 than 250 because of the bias that caused. Guinness is just a bit incompetent in their judgments about maximal records, especially when it's a judgement on an already inaccurate test.
@@BaseSixBasics She's most famous for busting the ass of every scientist and mathematician on the planet (or the ones who called and wrote in) on the Monty Hall Problem, for a while. Your sentences need work so i'm not sure really what you're trying to say exactly but if you're saying shes a genius, you are right. And it is not a matter of opinion. So embarrassing this guy can't even tell how smart she is so he is not close enough even to see it.
@@FinanceLogicYes, I am saying that she’s a genius and an empirically tested one at that. But she’s not as smart as most make her out to be because of the nature of intelligence and IQ tests. I’m pretty sure that she scored her 228 before she became famous for solving the Monty Hall problem, so I don’t know what she’s really known for. However, my sentences are fine. I’m just a difficult person to understand. And the interviewer doesn’t even know what to say to her because nobody can perceive what is invisible to them, and complexity is invisible to those who cannot comprehend it. He sees a normal person on a rant about the physical brain, not a meaningful perspective on the operations that govern the perceptions that make reality
@@BaseSixBasics yes that is what i assessed your incorrect assessment to be already. Even a dog or a moron could tell shes not an imbecile. But it seems maybe not everyone can see how far beyond normal genius she is.
The older I get the more I am convinced that "willpower" is just repetition of an action until it becomes the new normal, and the opposite also becomes true, the absence of that action becomes a feeling of inaction or loss.
Why is it that every video I've seen of this lady has people in the comments constantly chattering about how 'bad' the interviewer is?.. And how they're displaying such chauvinistic attitudes? It seems pretty ridiculous to me, because I'm not seeing much of what they're talking about. Very odd. She seems like a very nice, articulate, beautiful woman, but all she's doing is promoting this 'IQ score' stuff. 😂.. It's not like she was some world changing scientist who split the atom or anything. She wrote a weekly column and became a largely forgotten footnote from the 80s. She was a curiosity but nothing more. Probably why her best known interview was David Letterman's.
Good analysis. I think he is intimated by her. I think she thinks very fast and it is hard to keep up for him. You can see she is just firing this information out because she feels she needs to talk about it and has thought it through quite in depth. Where I feel his knowledge on the subjected is limited and the questions he asked reflected his understanding hence his lower down physical position and probley why he felt outsmarted. If someone give me the task of interviewing her I would get her to expand on everything as much as I could.
My immediate impression is not that he is threatened by her intelligence but that she is more well read in a particular field than he is. They could both have equal intelligence or he could be more intelligent. But she clearly knows more about subject X than he does, so that would put him at a disadvantage. It would be like Einstein talking to a diesel mechanic about diesel engines, though Einstein may be more intelligent he would be clearly out of his depth. An intelligent person knows when they are out of their depth. If she had a conversation with me about my specialty I would be running rings around her and she would just have to sit and listen.
He is intimidated, which has brought his insecurities to the front burner. He keeps interrupting so that he can do something other than face his insecurities.
what she's saying at the ending correlates with william james sidis's upbringing because his parents forced him to learn at a very young age and be became a genius. he was a science experiment gone right but morally plain wrong for the child, sure he had great accomplishments but died from a brain hemorrhage at the age of 40
What is it about interviewers, where they don't understand that someone interested in the guest would want them to be quiet and not be a distraction. It would literally be a better interview if he wasn't even there and she was just given questions in written form. This is how a bad interviewer behaves, needlessly saying "Mmm hmm" and "Huh", narrating their own thoughts at the detriment of the dialog. She's willing to explain anyway, just be silent.
@Francise05 "The stupid person thinks that he's as smart or smarter than the smart person, and therein lies his stupidity". Chris Langan. But if I had to guess, I don't think she's referring to use of the brain in a biophysical sense. Rather, the percentage of the persons mental capability that was being used. There's a big difference between having a functional brain and fulfilling your full mental potential. This is why she brings up motivation; as a catalyst to using more of our potential.
IQ test aim to determine intelligence, people with high results (on first try) are intelligent, but some people with low scores can be intelligent but there are many reasons to fail (such as ADD very common in high IQs) and some specialists are working on IQ test to mesure specific types of intelligence more precisely, such as kinesthesic intelligence or spatial reasonning a high score doesnt mean you are good at everything but that some areas are exceptionnaly acute
Keep in mind the date of the interview. During the 1980's neuroscience was indeed teaching we only use, such a percentage of their brain. I'm sure she knows better now :-).
I have one question.. *How is she not a rapper.* Like, I had to pause the video, and still don't understand anything just like in class. Call me a dumba** or something, but I just understood the last part where she mentioned William.
Exactly, one can not succeed only by having high intelligence, Feynman didn't break intelligence records with a pissing contest but he was an amazing scientist with many contributions towards humanity.
Feinman had an extreme iq - after he died it was discovered that there was an error in his records - his actual measured iq was much higher than the number in his records that he was aware of. Interestingly his sharp and witty style of conversation was similar in some respects to Marilyn's style.
People who come up with ideas that we would never think of are smart. Like Albert Einstein who came up with General Relativity. Also Henry Ford who came up with the idea for cars. And many more examples.
@@beraattekin8107 and u misspelled the entire message heres a correction She said that there are millions of Einstein's walking around that's definitely true as a genius myself i know that theres like 1000 high geniuses
@kotorfan8039 Meaning muscular contraction, heart work, blood pressure, electric activity, etc. Of course it's complex but if there's a 0 level (atrophy, paralysis, death), and there's a point for any body that is not possible to surpass, then you can get a rate. The same with the brain, from 0 (brain death) to the maximum a human mind could work efficiently you can create an average rate, and It's even more complex to measure but not impossible. She lives by thinking, so what do you expect?
@Francise05 That maybe true, but her point is that all these geniuses don't use their intelligence in a way which will improve their intellectual capabilities.
man she is so fucking smart i couldn't even keep up with the shit she was saying, partly cause im german native speaking but im surprised cause i have a fairly high iq myself and can usually keep up with people who speak in more complex phrasings and faster speech tempo but man the way she like structures her fucking sentences and so on it's hard for me to keep up lmao
Not the brain does the world a better plaxce but the heart does, such a intelligent person should´ve known it by now. But yes, mostly a highly intelligent person will also evolve a conscience, wich means, the greatest merrit of the intelligence is the capacity to awake the conscience.
Everyone here has heard of reverse psychology. A doctor sees a patient who is in a car accident and partially to nearly completely paralyzed. To one patient, Dr. will tell the truth. With hard work, you can walk again in maybe 10 years. It will be painful, and the most difficult thing you have ever done. But to another patient he will tell them they will never walk again. This is done to motivate the person to prove the doctor wrong.
She was dating like 5 guys ok the letterman show, before meeting her husband. The loneliness comes from people like this interviewer. She knows that he isn't keeping up, but as we are now, gaining alot of information from her comments. The interviewers jobs is to get information for the viewer, she's doing it for him lol.
Motivation > intelligence (but its a bellcurve the less you have the more it will help to what people call accomplishment/intelligence generally, if you have a lot motivation will contribute waaaaayyy more and it generally is contributing to all kinds of succsess way more) Lazyness does not let you lern/work how you may have wanted to. For me for sure fuck intelligence alone and its a cloudy concept anyway
@Francise05 this looks pretty old. 15 years ago neuroscience hadn't evolved into the almost pop culture phenomenon it has today, where it is not infrequent to stumble upon articles about neuroscience in your local paper. So it's pretty normal even for someone of her intellectual and educational status to not have a great understanding of it. Plus, I think you are misinterpreting her. I agree with @nilson4
There is a problem with using more of our brain. Firstly it is highly metabolically expensive. The brain is around a kilo maybe one and a half, yet consumes 20% of the oxygen and a lot of glucose as well. Recent studies also show that brain areas casually reach 40 degrees in certain areas, then we see the problem, as in overclocking computers, more is not necessarily better. As for the motivation aspect I doubt she has not considered the fact that intelligence is not merely an academic superfluousness but a necessary aspect of survival, and for any creature struggling to come up in the world, an optimization fight inside the architecture of the brain is taking place at all times. Then what we are left with in the case proposed by savant, is the motivation to pursue highly cognitive or abstract ideas which do provide survival benefits but not immediately, thus the lucidity of the reward is low. Then training people from a young age the discipline to master science and philosophy, would be beneficial. To a point of course. There is a naturalness in not maximizing the brain itself, but learning how to live more slowly. As a person, savant seems incredibly intense and sharp, yet i doubt she ever could harmonize with the ways of the world...
It's pathetic when somebody starts making unjustified assumptions about sombody else in an argument; I could care less about money or fame. Valid contributions to society are the only reasonable apect to judge someone for. If they do something beneficial with that money or fame, then I can appreciate that. Either way, we're at opposing ends of the spectrum; I find IQ to be worthless, you think that it means "everything."
I never liked how IQ works, i wanna what she has invented for humans? in other words her inventions. I am more impressed by her husband "Robert Jarvik", he was a part of Jarvik-7 artificial heart project. This lady has something that's why she married a scientist and vice versa.
@nilson4 Agreed. It's a misconception. When you do sports for example, you're using the 100% of your body because we use all of our body muscles, blood, etc. But my capability will never be the same as Usain Bolt's or Michael Phelps because they're trained and of course their using a higher percentage of their body capability when training than me jogging. It makes me laugh how many people feel so intimidated by her that they argue,analize and puts into controversy every word she says.
I don't think the percentage you use of the brain determines your intelligence as much as your chemical and genetic properties do. And if it does, I think it's totally dependent on these characteristics.
Hot is relative. Are you a hot human? A hot ape? A hot octopus?A hot bacterium? The it factor is biological and intellectual. We make these calculations every time we chose a mate.
Ok, i'm just going by what I watched and it was my attempt to hyperbolize on the extremes of both Marilyn and the interviewer on the intelligence spectrum. I understand she's not the smartest person and I also certainly know he's not the dumbest one either. Intelligence is an abstruse abstract concept which happens to be extremely hard to measure. IQ tests alone mean very little and is somewhat subjective. My facetious initial comment is 1 year old.
I clearly stated (and I quote) that "perhaps your IQ isn't high enough to comprehend simple English."By writing the word "perhaps," I give you the benefit of the doubt. I wasn't asserting that your IQ was in fact too low for basic comprehension. I never said that your IQ is "not high enough to speak english" which was your initial claim. Basic comprehension and speaking skills are two very different things. I knew English wasn't your first language, I figured you were using "Google translate."
notice how he was given a lower seat than Marilyn....and he wasn't given a microphone... i think people didn't really consider him very important compared to Marilyn
Hello Mr. Making bad assumptions probably about everyone and everything. To me you are ignorant, arrogant and stupid. What do you think of me? Please don't answer because your disgusting opinion does not matter nor is welcome!
@AJsteez It's kinda sad that as a woman she will never be smarter than a man. In conciliation I bet with all that knowledge she can make an awesome sunday roast!
i think...the interviewer was intimidated by her immediate responses. Anyway, the guy is annoying. !My interview, my chairrrrrrrr! (was probably what his ego was screaming).
I learned about her just now and came to look how she operates and I know this isn't kind but since neither will see this...this conversation displays pretty rudimentary intellectualism. Little disappointed but also realizing I'm maybe much smarter than I think:/ or I just have had more motivation to speak well and be more descriptive. I kept yelling in my mind "the words your looking for are traumatic brain injury goddammit"
I wish that guy would shut up while she is talking. She is way more intelligent and beautiful than he is and he should shut up and try to learn something.
All of these anti-Marilyn vos Savant comments are pretty immature. She has an IQ of 220. Get over it. An IQ is a statistic. She's not a narcissist. It's not like she's waving a flag saying, "My IQ is 220". It's not like she's considered a bigger genius than Einstein.
She's just giving an interview in which she presents ideas and opinions. Why all the immature comments? Why the like-to-dislike ratio? Stupid.
She doesn't really have an IQ of 220:
You can't accurate determine IQ above 180. Arguably above 160. Such figures are based on speculation, actually, and there are various forms of IQ and ways to trick people to think you have an iq higher than you actually have by using higher forms of IQ and presenting it as the normal score.
Don't be hard on them, they may have born stupid and can't help it.
MinamuTV
'She's not a narcissist. It's not like she's waving a flag saying, "My IQ is 220". '
Well she wasn't asked on for her cosmetics and bare legs.
She doesn't have to wave a flag. It shows in her attitude and demeanor.
perenceja . You are correct. She does not need to nor does she "wave" anything. That woman is a national treasure, a world treasure, in fact. And truly an absolutely magnificent beauty. And magnificent in more ways than one . . .
She's right. Motivation is tremendously important. And motivation is not necessarily tied to 'intelligence'. There are other factors of course. When discussing people of high IQ, its a mistake to assume that just because you are six foot eight, you are a basketball player.
Perhaps the fact that she is beautiful (and incredibly smart) intimidates some people. If someone like Marilyn is considered a "fraud" then I submit that this world desperately needs more "frauds" like her!
That's a sexist and racist statement
In a prior interview she mentions the way that she was recognized for her IQ which was the omni book with a test that was administered to a small group and she had the highest score. Her IQ is closer to 150 than 250 because of the bias that caused. Guinness is just a bit incompetent in their judgments about maximal records, especially when it's a judgement on an already inaccurate test.
@@BaseSixBasics She's most famous for busting the ass of every scientist and mathematician on the planet (or the ones who called and wrote in) on the Monty Hall Problem, for a while. Your sentences need work so i'm not sure really what you're trying to say exactly but if you're saying shes a genius, you are right. And it is not a matter of opinion. So embarrassing this guy can't even tell how smart she is so he is not close enough even to see it.
@@FinanceLogicYes, I am saying that she’s a genius and an empirically tested one at that. But she’s not as smart as most make her out to be because of the nature of intelligence and IQ tests. I’m pretty sure that she scored her 228 before she became famous for solving the Monty Hall problem, so I don’t know what she’s really known for. However, my sentences are fine. I’m just a difficult person to understand. And the interviewer doesn’t even know what to say to her because nobody can perceive what is invisible to them, and complexity is invisible to those who cannot comprehend it. He sees a normal person on a rant about the physical brain, not a meaningful perspective on the operations that govern the perceptions that make reality
@@BaseSixBasics yes that is what i assessed your incorrect assessment to be already. Even a dog or a moron could tell shes not an imbecile. But it seems maybe not everyone can see how far beyond normal genius she is.
The older I get the more I am convinced that "willpower" is just repetition of an action until it becomes the new normal, and the opposite also becomes true, the absence of that action becomes a feeling of inaction or loss.
We are forgetting that Michelangelo was a master poet, master sculptor, master painter, and master architect. I'd call that genius.
I believe he was an engineer as well.
Sure, but what has he done LATELY?
Thomas Campbell Fucking dead.
@@thomascampbell5633 Karl Pilkington enters the room...
Da Vinci too. Designed machine guns hundreds of years before they were used
She's amazing
It's interesting that God also made the smartest person in the world SMOKING HOT!!!!!!!
Intelligence and looks seem to have a relationship..
Agreed
I read an article and there is no such thing as "the smartest human". They made good points and of which I have forgot.
@@notcannon2.224 is this irony 😂
Typical imbecils and idiots!
She is in every way perfect. Brilliant. Humble. Sexy. Confident. I LOVE the fact that the smartest human being on this planet is a woman!
Ainan Cawley: IQ 263
Marnen Laibow-Koser: IQ 268
Adragon De Mello: IQ 400
The smartest are men, unfortunately..
@@PeterMasalski93 I searched all these people up, you're right.
@@PeterMasalski93Bruh 400 iq real
I must be a genius because I cannot hold down a steady job.
La même cousin!
What a fascinating woman. I could listen to her for ages. Who's the interrupter, some patronising jealous character?
Why is it that every video I've seen of this lady has people in the comments constantly chattering about how 'bad' the interviewer is?.. And how they're displaying such chauvinistic attitudes? It seems pretty ridiculous to me, because I'm not seeing much of what they're talking about. Very odd. She seems like a very nice, articulate, beautiful woman, but all she's doing is promoting this 'IQ score' stuff. 😂.. It's not like she was some world changing scientist who split the atom or anything. She wrote a weekly column and became a largely forgotten footnote from the 80s. She was a curiosity but nothing more. Probably why her best known interview was David Letterman's.
I've only made one error in my life. That was one time when I thought I'd made a mistake but hadn't.
You're right
What a gracefully beautiful woman.
I think he feels threatened by her intelligence and her elevated posture and therefore he’s interrupting often during the interview.
Good analysis. I think he is intimated by her. I think she thinks very fast and it is hard to keep up for him. You can see she is just firing this information out because she feels she needs to talk about it and has thought it through quite in depth. Where I feel his knowledge on the subjected is limited and the questions he asked reflected his understanding hence his lower down physical position and probley why he felt outsmarted. If someone give me the task of interviewing her I would get her to expand on everything as much as I could.
@@Adrianpublandlord She's hot too
he did that with literally everyone... lol
My immediate impression is not that he is threatened by her intelligence but that she is more well read in a particular field than he is. They could both have equal intelligence or he could be more intelligent. But she clearly knows more about subject X than he does, so that would put him at a disadvantage. It would be like Einstein talking to a diesel mechanic about diesel engines, though Einstein may be more intelligent he would be clearly out of his depth. An intelligent person knows when they are out of their depth. If she had a conversation with me about my specialty I would be running rings around her and she would just have to sit and listen.
@Meredith Dady not rlly interrupting he's mostly agreeing with her u women sure like to sling baseless accusations
Why does he keep interrupting her?
He is intimidated, which has brought his insecurities to the front burner. He keeps interrupting so that he can do something other than face his insecurities.
@@Jeff.b.i. not rlly he's not even interruptint he's just agreeing most of his comments are along the lines of "yeah that's true"
what she's saying at the ending correlates with william james sidis's upbringing because his parents forced him to learn at a very young age and be became a genius. he was a science experiment gone right but morally plain wrong for the child, sure he had great accomplishments but died from a brain hemorrhage at the age of 40
What is it about interviewers, where they don't understand that someone interested in the guest would want them to be quiet and not be a distraction. It would literally be a better interview if he wasn't even there and she was just given questions in written form. This is how a bad interviewer behaves, needlessly saying "Mmm hmm" and "Huh", narrating their own thoughts at the detriment of the dialog. She's willing to explain anyway, just be silent.
@Francise05 "The stupid person thinks that he's as smart or smarter than the smart person, and therein lies his stupidity". Chris Langan. But if I had to guess, I don't think she's referring to use of the brain in a biophysical sense. Rather, the percentage of the persons mental capability that was being used. There's a big difference between having a functional brain and fulfilling your full mental potential. This is why she brings up motivation; as a catalyst to using more of our potential.
IQ test aim to determine intelligence, people with high results (on first try) are intelligent, but some people with low scores can be intelligent but there are many reasons to fail (such as ADD very common in high IQs)
and some specialists are working on IQ test to mesure specific types of intelligence more precisely, such as kinesthesic intelligence or spatial reasonning
a high score doesnt mean you are good at everything but that some areas are exceptionnaly acute
Yes, it is called an average score...The more variables you have , the neerest from what you want to test, it is.
Dude you have high iq
I only wish there were more videos of her =/
This is just ridiculous.
Keep in mind the date of the interview. During the 1980's neuroscience was indeed teaching we only use, such a percentage of their brain.
I'm sure she knows better now :-).
No, they didnt.
I have one question.. *How is she not a rapper.* Like, I had to pause the video, and still don't understand anything just like in class. Call me a dumba** or something, but I just understood the last part where she mentioned William.
Exactly, one can not succeed only by having high intelligence, Feynman didn't break intelligence records with a pissing contest but he was an amazing scientist with many contributions towards humanity.
Feinman had an extreme iq - after he died it was discovered that there was an error in his records - his actual measured iq was much higher than the number in his records that he was aware of. Interestingly his sharp and witty style of conversation was similar in some respects to Marilyn's style.
I would love to know how you created wealth Ms Vos Savant
People who come up with ideas that we would never think of are smart. Like Albert Einstein who came up with General Relativity. Also Henry Ford who came up with the idea for cars. And many more examples.
My let earphone is crying from exclusion
She said there are millions of Einstein's walking around that's definitely true as a genius I know that, really high geniuses there's like 1000
Imagine calling yourself a genius because nobody probably cares about you
@@KRYJ let’s grr thanks
@@beraattekin8107 u liked ur own comment shows ur genius
@@beraattekin8107 and u misspelled the entire message heres a correction She said that there are millions of Einstein's walking around that's definitely true as a genius myself i know that theres like 1000 high geniuses
Very attractive and insightful bright lovely lady x0
This guy cannot stand the fact that she is more intelligent than him.
Please define intelligence, genuine request.
She's probably double the IQ of the interviewer 🤗
I just read somewhere that she has an IQ of 228!!! That's insane.
He's like "SHE JUST KEEPS TALKING!" ...
...very interesting interview
Try it, mentor and motivate and out of 20 you might get 1. People have to be self motivated.
@Francise05 yes but this was filmed in 1986 when nobody knew that.
Why cut an interesting conversation short?
@kotorfan8039 Meaning muscular contraction, heart work, blood pressure, electric activity, etc. Of course it's complex but if there's a 0 level (atrophy, paralysis, death), and there's a point for any body that is not possible to surpass, then you can get a rate. The same with the brain, from 0 (brain death) to the maximum a human mind could work efficiently you can create an average rate, and It's even more complex to measure but not impossible. She lives by thinking, so what do you expect?
life is cruel why do we get old she was so beautiful when she was young DAMN YOU NATURE!
Don’t be so shallow
All the best fruit will bruise and get wrinkled if you don’t pick it at it’s prime.
@Francise05
That maybe true, but her point is that all these geniuses don't use their intelligence in a way which will improve their intellectual capabilities.
so many butthurt people that oppose her and her intelligence just for reasons...
I know this is an old comment but does not seem like it. If anything everyone's sucking up to her.
Beautiful woman..
man she is so fucking smart i couldn't even keep up with the shit she was saying, partly cause im german native speaking but im surprised cause i have a fairly high iq myself and can usually keep up with people who speak in more complex phrasings and faster speech tempo but man the way she like structures her fucking sentences and so on it's hard for me to keep up lmao
A challinging dynamic and interested environment.
Such an interesting woman.
The video description is very assumptive. Assuming that the world needs to be changed is a simple mistake.
Not the brain does the world a better plaxce but the heart does, such a intelligent person should´ve known it by now.
But yes, mostly a highly intelligent person will also evolve a conscience, wich means, the greatest merrit of the intelligence is the capacity to awake the conscience.
Everyone here has heard of reverse psychology.
A doctor sees a patient who is in a car accident and partially to nearly completely paralyzed.
To one patient, Dr. will tell the truth. With hard work, you can walk again in maybe 10 years. It will be painful, and the most difficult thing you have ever done.
But to another patient he will tell them they will never walk again. This is done to motivate the person to prove the doctor wrong.
Omg I am 12 years old. Its mean when this video uploaded I was only 1 year.😧
@Francise05 well you have to keep in mind this was recorded some time ago.
Marilyn.. I love you :D
I think you can motivate other people in certain ways. It's just not super direct
just start by clearly explaining WHAT motivation is -- in the first place..
She was extremely Hot and intelligent what more could u ask for
She is also super hot!!!
Wisdom is infinetly more respectable then intelligence.
They both go hand in hand. Knowledge is completely useless without intelligence and vice versa.
Oh it is huh? Like George Bush, for example?
@@Nicholas_DaFunch He said wisdom not knowledge...
Wisdom is not intelligence. Wisdom is just experience and realization.
Her IQ is 228. Her world must be quite lonely. It must be difficult engaging with people who are so far beneath her in terms of intellect
@Dnomyar Akunawik Her IQ IS 228. Are you tripping over your sexism Akunawik, or do you just need to clean the wax out of your ears?
She was dating like 5 guys ok the letterman show, before meeting her husband. The loneliness comes from people like this interviewer. She knows that he isn't keeping up, but as we are now, gaining alot of information from her comments. The interviewers jobs is to get information for the viewer, she's doing it for him lol.
Motivation > intelligence (but its a bellcurve the less you have the more it will help to what people call accomplishment/intelligence generally, if you have a lot motivation will contribute waaaaayyy more and it generally is contributing to all kinds of succsess way more)
Lazyness does not let you lern/work how you may have wanted to. For me for sure fuck intelligence alone and its a cloudy concept anyway
many psychologist reject the notion that we only use a portion of our brains
@zw0ecool Why the hell did that make me giggle?
@1:45 Did Savant speculate that Michelangelo was possibly illiterate???
A few years ago I read a book of his letters. Could he have dictated them all?
I dont have a neurologist at hand, and besides its just their word agaisnt another.
So is Adam Sandler a genuis?
@Francise05 this looks pretty old. 15 years ago neuroscience hadn't evolved into the almost pop culture phenomenon it has today, where it is not infrequent to stumble upon articles about neuroscience in your local paper. So it's pretty normal even for someone of her intellectual and educational status to not have a great understanding of it. Plus, I think you are misinterpreting her. I agree with @nilson4
intelligence is the power to do and have more in economical ways
There is a problem with using more of our brain. Firstly it is highly metabolically expensive. The brain is around a kilo maybe one and a half, yet consumes 20% of the oxygen and a lot of glucose as well. Recent studies also show that brain areas casually reach 40 degrees in certain areas, then we see the problem, as in overclocking computers, more is not necessarily better. As for the motivation aspect I doubt she has not considered the fact that intelligence is not merely an academic superfluousness but a necessary aspect of survival, and for any creature struggling to come up in the world, an optimization fight inside the architecture of the brain is taking place at all times. Then what we are left with in the case proposed by savant, is the motivation to pursue highly cognitive or abstract ideas which do provide survival benefits but not immediately, thus the lucidity of the reward is low. Then training people from a young age the discipline to master science and philosophy, would be beneficial. To a point of course. There is a naturalness in not maximizing the brain itself, but learning how to live more slowly. As a person, savant seems incredibly intense and sharp, yet i doubt she ever could harmonize with the ways of the world...
You are a 🤡
The translator thing was just a joke. You see, we can both come to an agreement. Have a good one! :-)
It's pathetic when somebody starts making unjustified assumptions about sombody else in an argument; I could care less about money or fame. Valid contributions to society are the only reasonable apect to judge someone for.
If they do something beneficial with that money or fame, then I can appreciate that.
Either way, we're at opposing ends of the spectrum; I find IQ to be worthless, you think that it means "everything."
What do we know ? Perhaps < 1 procent that can be known ? Who knows ?
@Databamse Ummmmm, you spelled "its" wrong : ) Oh well, you can be the 3rd smartest person (behind Marilyn and me).
thats right
mmhmmm, yeah, yeah right, mmmmm, mmhmmm? OH HUH MMMMM THAT IS INTERESTING
MrAnalogCone I’m the first like in 8 years
Reunite The British Empire I’m your first like in two hour’s
Optimizing the human mental power by understanding AQAL. Meditation also increases IQ.
Meditation doesn’t increase IQ, Meditation discover new intelligence.
I never liked how IQ works, i wanna what she has invented for humans? in other words her inventions.
I am more impressed by her husband "Robert Jarvik", he was a part of Jarvik-7 artificial heart project.
This lady has something that's why she married a scientist and vice versa.
@nilson4 Agreed. It's a misconception. When you do sports for example, you're using the 100% of your body because we use all of our body muscles, blood, etc. But my capability will never be the same as Usain Bolt's or Michael Phelps because they're trained and of course their using a higher percentage of their body capability when training than me jogging. It makes me laugh how many people feel so intimidated by her that they argue,analize and puts into controversy every word she says.
hahahaha that guy is not able follow her.
😐
She says "Umm"!!! :O her mind can't be thinking that clear....
I don't think the percentage you use of the brain determines your intelligence as much as your chemical and genetic properties do. And if it does, I think it's totally dependent on these characteristics.
Yeah we use all our brain just not at the same time. She keeps bringing that up and it's junk pop science
Hot is relative. Are you a hot human? A hot ape? A hot octopus?A hot bacterium? The it factor is biological and intellectual. We make these calculations every time we chose a mate.
Its her responsibility.
Ok, i'm just going by what I watched and it was my attempt to hyperbolize on the extremes of both Marilyn and the interviewer on the intelligence spectrum.
I understand she's not the smartest person and I also certainly know he's not the dumbest one either.
Intelligence is an abstruse abstract concept which happens to be extremely hard to measure. IQ tests alone mean very little and is somewhat subjective. My facetious initial comment is 1 year old.
This advantage we have in different countries.
احح ذي اذكى بنت فالتاريخ،المقترحات طلعت ناس دوافير😂
I clearly stated (and I quote) that "perhaps your IQ isn't high enough to comprehend simple English."By writing the word "perhaps," I give you the benefit of the doubt. I wasn't asserting that your IQ was in fact too low for basic comprehension.
I never said that your IQ is "not high enough to speak english" which was your initial claim. Basic comprehension and speaking skills are two very different things. I knew English wasn't your first language, I figured you were using "Google translate."
you can measure creativity...
Yikes,che bella!
Tests in the end you can learn. It has created new? Original ideas or what gave birth?
Please clean up the audio.
notice how he was given a lower seat than Marilyn....and he wasn't given a microphone... i think people didn't really consider him very important compared to Marilyn
Am I the only one that notices she has the same accent and/or way of speaking of Donald Trump?
He's a genius, no lie. Doesn't mean I like everything about him but, super smart
prove it....
@Francise05 She was misinformed, it's no big deal.
That is not proof, and besides no one said 10 percent was in a concentrated area.
William James Sidis
This guy has an IQ of 70
Hello Mr. Making bad assumptions probably about everyone and everything. To me you are ignorant, arrogant and stupid.
What do you think of me? Please don't answer because your disgusting opinion does not matter nor is welcome!
@@zarmadyl5038 ok bro
I think the only way we can use a bigger proportion of our brain has to do with evolution , maybe in a thousand years if the earth still goes round
Hard evidence.
@AJsteez
It's kinda sad that as a woman she will never be smarter than a man. In conciliation I bet with all that knowledge she can make an awesome sunday roast!
lol people here acting like they would fare that much better than the interview, get a grip of yourselves.
@Francise05
maybe you're thinking of different things
i think...the interviewer was intimidated by her immediate responses. Anyway, the guy is annoying. !My interview, my chairrrrrrrr! (was probably what his ego was screaming).
I learned about her just now and came to look how she operates and I know this isn't kind but since neither will see this...this conversation displays pretty rudimentary intellectualism. Little disappointed but also realizing I'm maybe much smarter than I think:/ or I just have had more motivation to speak well and be more descriptive. I kept yelling in my mind "the words your looking for are traumatic brain injury goddammit"
They got a chauvinist to interview her.
I wish that guy would shut up while she is talking. She is way more intelligent and beautiful than he is and he should shut up and try to learn something.
this woman has a 228 iq... highest ever recorded.
James Sidis: hold my New York Times