“Environmental Scares: Yesterday and Today” - Rupert Darwall
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 фев 2016
- “Environmental Scares: Yesterday and Today”
Rupert Darwall, Author, "The Age of Global Warming: A History"
See more from this National Leadership seminar at nls.hillsdale.edu/
"When they own the information, they can bend it all they want."
-John Mayer
Funny, I just realized that when the album with that song came out, that's when the media changed their coverage of him from heartthrob to lunatic.
No matter how many scares are debunked by facts, there are still enough sheep out there who will believe the next hockey stick story!
@jim coulter I never liked the concept of Universal Suffrage, as more than 60% of people are actually mindless sheep (now even more than before with their attention stuck in their smart phones!) but no other system has proven to be better so far.
@Paul Gavin Sheep are fashionable, nice wool coat, follow the herd, etc.
There is a sucker born every minute - PT Barnum
@@BonsuBigWhale Every 12 seconds.
There will always be. Some people still think there's a god up there watching us and giving visions to some lunatics who then write books for us common mortals so we can follow god will, and you could be one of them for what i know. Today environmentalism is just another f-ing religion.
This should be taught in all the country's schools
True!!
ActuarialNinja
The majority agrees with you. The only way to correct this is to “dissolve these official delegated positions” where a few immoral pawns are allowed to make corrupt, indoctrinated decisions and write the curriculum based on swayed politics and theoretical pseudo science agendas. Now, “create and vote in many local groups of decision makers” who will follow a diversity of sound checks and balances and use multi-cultural studies that will improve every child’s social & character development, with the emphasis on strengthening the family.
No longer relying on the competition of grade status, but focusing on each student’s talents then finding better ways to master them to develop confidence. Also learning the skills to improve weaknesses. Learning sound principles through social activities such as: ethics, etiquettes, the 12 principles of the Scout Law, how to become self sustaining outside the home with a budget, successful work habits, the value of saving money, well-thought out career choices, buying a home, and car investments. How to become a good citizen.
American colleges are communist controlled.
You are starting with faulty premise. How about, you read Naomi Klein; never let a crisis go to waste. What do you do if there is no crisis? Manufacture one.
'Silent Spring' DDT
acid rain
'China Syndrome'
climate change
What makes you think the government that created the EPA, hasn't been pushing the same agenda in their schools? Yes, THEIR SCHOOLS. Department of Education been around longer than the EPA, hasn't it? The always start with the youth. Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, they all start at the same places, and use the same tactics.
Look up Charlotte Iserbyt. She was the head of the Department of Education under POTUS Reagan.
She wrote, "The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America."
You won't ever expect them to teach the truth again.
This is all about free thought and free speech. Imagine anyone on the Left affirming the old adage, "I disagree with what you say, but defend your right to say it". That is NOT affirmed by the Left; only the right.
@joe jitsu You're correct about my orientation. My use of Right and Left are in a contemporary American context, not your historical context, but I take your point. Thanks for the constructive edification.
@joe jitsu Yes Joe. It's unfortunate that so many can't have constructive exchanges on social media. I often get disagreeable responses, but I don't take offense. I don't expect anyone to agree with me, and responses often teach me something. Echo chambers are boring. Best, Craig.
There is no 'left' or 'right', there is only extremist politics that seeks to control you.
@joe jitsu Anyone can control you with the threat of violence, or the threat of guilt. Warmists use people's guilt about overpopulation and warming to control people.
Craig Castanet, D.C. Your comment is sadly ignorant. I'm afraid you've been misled. And try not to be a bigot, if you can stop yourself. Bigotry is shameful.
This very revealing talk should have much more views.
I was just thinking the same thing! If his talk suggested the very opposite,& if his name were say,Michael Moore, there'd be 3million views,bcuz Google manipulates search results.
@@Celesteparadise It would be because Michael Moore's name is much better known, and his view is more popular. Although I agree, Google does control everything they can control!
Most people are too stupid to comprehend science. Pseudoscience is much easier as it allows you to believe whatever you want and just make things up to suit your preferences. So much like religion it is not funny. Deadly serious way to control the sheeple.
Need to make an executive summary version of this. No more than 4 minutes..... working people don't have as much time.
Theyre paid by fissile fuel companies to tell you climate change isnt a problem. Check for yourself
Scientists have actually been fired for calling bs on the global warming ruse. You play the game or you get black balled.
when did so many decide that it was OK to let yourself be a liar or a lire by your silence ? Honest people do not put their current job status ABOVE the death of LIBERTY> Would I ?? don't know until it happens but i tell myself every day don't lie and don't lie by silence.
And they have the nerve to call it 97% consensus!
Prof. Susan Crockford is a great example. While the alarmists were pumping up the climate-change-polar-bear-extinction hysteria, Crockford actually studied the issue and found that polar bears are doing just fine -- in fact their numbers are higher than they've ever been over the past 60 years.
She was blackballed and railroaded out of the University of Victoria, smeared in the media, and outright persecuted for gathering data and reporting the facts.
Chuck You. Who has been fired? Which scientists?
@@supernannoe44 many of these pics people cant afford to be fired or federal funding to stop as they have families to feed. While I agree w you about speaking up - it all depends on who is dependent on your wage/salary - maybe a single person might be more likely to speak up.
Scientist in Queensland Australia lost his job questioning climate science, he took the University to crt ... He was paid 1.2 mil compensation.. Scientists are lobbied or frightened to speak up ..
The late Bob Carter did the same thing, from the same university ( Townsville), and appeared on many panels and TV. Here's one of his lectures... shows.ruclips.net/video/DRCISn1KfKQ/видео.html
All that scientist did was use sophisticated measurements over a long periods to prove that the corals of the Great Barrier Reef were healthy and not in decline. That completely undermined part of the global climate change alarmism.
Source?
William Crooks ruclips.net/video/M7j75L38PlI/видео.html
Google Professor Peter Ridd : James Cook University to pay 1.2 mil damages ..
Plants thrive on Co2 and reward us with ovygen.
@jassybee - I wonder how much CO2 is emitted when Greta Thunberg speaks!!
All very well, but if I wanted to live in the tropics I'd move there.
It's not just "more" CO2, it's warming the planet so rapidly that most life on Earth won't be able to adapt and will go extinct. It's critical to understand how this rapid warming upsets the whole wed of life on land and in the oceans.
@Jim Browski Thank you for your reply.
I'm a researcher who has studied the unraveling of society and the Earth for 15 years. I work very hard to get the facts right, but most people aren't caught up on the research, so they don't know how human activity is destroying the ability of the Earth to support life, or don't know just how much of an emergency this is. I suppose that when you aren't reading the research daily but are consuming social media that spreads dangerous half-truths like "CO2 is good for plants, so everything will be fine," what I'm saying doesn't fit your thinking so it sounds like bs to you. But those are the facts, and we've known for more than a century that more greenhouse gases means a warmer Earth. Even Exxon's own internal memos from its scientists admit this and accurately predicted (back in the 1980s) how much the Earth would warm if we kept burning fossil fuels.
I'm just trying to do what I can to warn people so we can turn things around before it's too late for current and future generations.
Take care.
@@TheChamp1971 That's not CO2, that's methane.
The thermometer was perfected in 1705 by Farenheit, 127 degrese farenheit was recorded in 1856 in South Australia's state of the art new weather station in Adelade... and cannot be denied. Heat waves were comon then as now...and the buffalo roamed the US in the million.
When you talk about buffalo, you bring up the methane BSj, and someone usually says that our cattle now a days, out numbers the buffalo. But what about the thousands of species that we have supposed to have destroyed ? Seems to me our cows have got alot of farting and burping to do to catch up !
@@waynebow-gu7wr now scientists are thinking that desertification is caused by not enough grazing because we have decimated natural grazing species and reduced cow grazing and deserts are still growing. Bring grazers back and plants don't just dry up and die. It's common sense but they lied to us and said we had too many cows grazing and we were creating too many desert so grazing is restricted. I learned about this in college and my common sense told me that grazing wouldn't be bad because it has been a natural process forever, unless there is way, too much of it. I took it for granted that the scientists would be correct in that there was too much grazing. Now we find out they were likely wrong.
Uh, you are citing an isolated statistic from one place. Globally, eight of the ten warmest years in recorded history were in the last eleven years. Record warm temps are outnumbering record colds by 2-to-1. Heat waves are getting far worse--and it's because those things called "greenhouse gases" make the world warmer!
@@karlwheatley1244 My Gift To Climate Alarmists -
ruclips.net/video/8455KEDitpU/видео.html
The buffalo were in the hundreds of millions. Estimates up to 1/2 a billion plains and woods buffalo
Environmentalism has made our fuel bills more expensive, driving some people into fuel poverty. Typically it adds about 9% to 10% to bills. The excuse for the addition is 'research into cleaner energy'.
And that research hasn't paid off yet obviously. Oh wait...obama gave it to Solindra, to go bankrupt..
In South Australia, they just installed wind / solar and Tesla Batteries. Their power bills have doubled ( when they can get power), and every South Australian ( man woman and child), is in debt ( National Debt ) for $10,000 for the batteries !
@@waynebow-gu7wr -Time for revolution. When gov fears the people you have freedom - when the people fear the gov you have tyranny. Is the 10g your total debt per person, or just added on to the previous debt? The USA is over 64g/ person -3rd place behind Japan 1st and Ireland 2nd .
@@jameseverett9037 Added on !
@@waynebow-gu7wr Melbourne has been told to expect rolling power shut downs this summer , last winter pensioners froze in their own homes because they could not afford the costs of heating . 200 per cent increase in energy bills in ten years and a third world power supply . this is working out really well!!
Intelligent assessment of the subject! THANKS!
We give a new societal institution almost a limitless amount of funding and then wonder why it goes corrupt? Hehe.
Good comment. If you are not creating or producing new wealth there is only one way to get rich and powerful. Lie, cheat and steal. Like China!
You're right, we never should have allowed Fox News to exist. And it couldn't exist if we hadn't repealed the Fairness Act--which required the media to tell the truth.
I was mainly thinking of science here. Just building the Large Hadron Collider cost 7.5 billion and who knows how much have been spent on operational costs plus the staff and so on, on this kind of basic research. In the social sciences in some fields they just push out peer reviewed nonsense with next to zero methodological credibility but they've managed to build a business around it which guarantees that they can make a living out of that and teaching young people nonsense. And once people's livelihoods and life's work is in there you can't really expect them to be fully honest and ready to scrap their speculations they call theories. Once something gets tangled up with big money and politics it becomes unavoidable that it becomes corrupt. Science depending on the field is in neck deep.
God youre naive. These speakers are funded by oil companies. Google for yourself
The talk is very recommendable!
Prior to the Obama election, on the NASA website there was an excellent article about climate change in which they discussed numerous causes and that some combinations of the causes was the most probable reason. After Obama took office that disappeared and we know his position!
He just spent 14 million dollars on a house right next to the sea. That tells me something!
@@annyer262 Exactly!
There WAS and IS no change in climate.
Pmtd1234 Read the IPCC reports and you will find plenty of discussion of the forcings that can cause climate change, and why all of them except for anthropogenic GHGs can be eliminated as responsible for the present warming. or perhaps you prefer to get your information from AGW Denialists. Perhaps you prefer to stay in a state of ignorance. Many people do.
@@MendTheWorld Tell me, has the frequency and strength of tornados/storms increased since GW began? Has heat waves increased, from what we see from long term data in the USA? Or rather, has the cost of destruction these events cause increased? If you are honest, the answer is No, they haven't. This doesn't fit with your hypothesis very well does it. The alarmism is uncalled for, these claims people like you are making is what we woulde expect from Doomsayers lunies. Maybe you will reply the temperature has gone up. Yes, it did. But then nothing, according to measurments. Take a look for yourself (the numbers are the data, look at the bottom of the page) www.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0/tlt/uahncdc_lt_6.0.txt
If you want me to trust that you are a rational human being and not an ideolog, then you must also see it from my perspective and understand the critique I am presenting. Because I know your side very well.
Much good information here, I am sure - it was spoken so fast I could hardly register what he was saying by the time he was finished with the next point. I really appreciate what Hillsdale is doing!
Emma, you can change the speed. Click on the "Settings" icon, the gear shaped symbol to the right of the CC (closed caption) symbol. You can slow quick speakers down or speed slow speakers up.
Thank you for re-loading
I did an acid rain test of Leeds, and over 2 consecutive years. Interesting results, more complex than the books would have us believe. And I pondered that the awakening of springtime, coincided with the rise of pH levels, which persisted over the summer months. Of course no one had actually done any tests for acid rain, so no one understood my thoughts. But some readings were down to a pH of 3.6, and similar results occurred two years in a row, back in 1993/94 and 1994/95. How it is now who knows. At the time the city council said "So what ?". Now of course they are about to set a congestion charge for traffic, now there is reason to raise taxes from motorists
Highly intellectual conversation with great audiences with great questions. Great education. Great day to you with deepest appreciation from Palau
Only a small crowd in the lecture hall, 32000 crowd in You Tube
Can anyone point to a single prediction by global warming alarmists that has ever come true? Moreover, can the global warming alarmists explain years and years of failed predictions?
Let's start with the fact that we still have ice caps and the west side highway in NYC is not underwater.
Climate predictions - 100% of the time proved to be wrong. Climate alarmism is a UN tactic about control of the West & to extract $$ from the West (to give to poor nations) ie communism. Latest UN talkfest "overhaul of world's financial order to tackle climate change as well as raise & redistribute $US2.5 trillion pa to developing countries" Of course this $US2.5 trillion is expected to come from the West ie taxpayers. Tell them they're dreaming.
@@megmartel6005 They do not wish to distribute the money to developing countries. They wish to cull the populatuons of those countries. Then come for your population as well.
They got to get the 7 billion down to 500,000,000 to keep the world "balanced" and "sustainable".
Most environmental policy needs to be handled locally. Pollution is largely regional. But people think they are only making an impact if they act globally. But then they prove the lie by telling people banning light bulbs and straws are the answer because those are enforceable and they can let people feel they are making a difference. It’s insane. Because it’s political.
First, the signal for human influence in climate change is still about 30 years from being discernible. And people confuse land temps with atmospheric temperature. It’s an eschatological religion.
Also, and I really believe this, its aesthetics. Those “majestic” wind turbines have an aesthetic appeal which coal and oil lack.
Very good lecture!!
The MSM would never show this. That’s why it’s impossible to have a conversation with normies. Water cooler talking points must be confined to the MSM generated consensus.
Amen. My daughter was terrified the other day because I said out loud and ouside that I am a trump supporter. She's a senior at a prominent Uni and beleives bad actors will come to our house and assault us in response. She voted for Trump
Brilliant.
This video needs more exposure!
Thank you.
Great comment section, for a change. I find that encouraging, and it appears that many are becoming aware.
Well presented and thought provoking. Acid rain, yes I remember that.
Napoleon noted that "fear and self interest are the only levers that move men". The fear narrative has been inculcated into the elite and "evolved" by expert lemmings who intimidate non-expert lemmings by ostrizing them. And it moves down the line.
It requires more and better reading material of all kinds and getting clear on my imperical beliefs. I don't argue, but I am not intimidated to think or speak up about false science.
@@JeanSweeny said:
_Napoleon noted that "fear and self interest are the only levers that move men". The fear narrative has been inculcated into the elite and "evolved" by expert lemmings who intimidate non-expert lemmings by ostracising them. And it moves down the line._
_It requires more and better reading material of all kinds and getting clear on my empirical beliefs. I don't argue, but I am not intimidated to think or speak up about false science._
Profound words Jean.👍 It's a great shame there aren't more intelligent women in politics and the media.
Erik the Red settled Greenland about 950 AD during a warming period when the sun produces lots of sun spots.. There were green pastures for grazing and fertile soil for crops. The sun detrmines climate, not man. The Little Ice Age lasted for about 300 years and that was also caused by the sun when it took a lenghty nap producing few sun spots. Check it out.
"In becoming a tool of political advocacy the nature of climate science became antithetical to the nature of science itself. What is called objectivity consists solely in the critical approach the philosopher Karl Popper wrote: Because criticism risked undermining the consensus needed to save the planet, evidence was withheld, and criticism delegitimized as serving the interests of maligned fossil fuel corporations and malevolent climate deniers."
I remember being terrified of Acid rain as a child. What a sham!
Thanks for this interesting video because it helps us to understand in a better way the hard reality we are living now, a world with a new climate, a new enviroment and with a very affected earth. So we have to change but unfortunately we will continue seeing consecuenques of the things we have made.
santa clause AGW acid rain tooth fairy
Santa Claus was real.
He was a Catholic bishop around
330ad.
His feast day is dec 6.
Mad Law “fairytales are true
Not because they tell us dragons exist but because they tell us dragons can be beat.”
GK Chesterton
Very quotable, this Darwall.
It’s not about the environment, it’s about who runs things!
Hey climate guys-
Earth warms and ice caps melt-
1.Billionaires will find their beach front mansions under water-new beach is inland where poor people live- billionaires must pay poor people huge amounts for the beach property- hooray for wealth redistribution
2. Sea levels rise- whale habitat increases- and their population expands- Yay for whales
3. More ocean means more fish which means more seafood for the poor - Go poor people!!
4. Expansion of sea surface means more rainfall and more fresh water-Down with droughts!!
5. More rainfall means deserts across the globe become arable farmland and we have a huge surplus of low cost food- great for previously starving, but now overweight Africans.
6. melted glaciers mean Siberia, N. Canada, Antarctica, Greenland and Iceland are now open for people to move and live there- Yes to homesteading.
Another champion of the truth and reality.
Very telling.
Green Individual Energy for your home is what is needed. Mini Grids are needed. Currently solar panels are cheaper per watt then utility power.
Would it be too much to ask for you to get into the difference between carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide (which is in effect what the air is polluting)?
"A good model is a means of systematically bringing together understanding of a scientific problem to yield predictions and then test that understanding against nature. If the predictions are wrong it follows that there's something wrong or incomplete with scientists understanding. I referred a little earlier to a profound and subtle change in the nature and purpose of science, and here's a key point about it; This is not about advancing scientific knowledge on climate. It's about war. And science is one of the weapons used in that war. Science has been weaponized."
Yes the so called science is a fraud
ruclips.net/video/i-qBOyrD0-0/видео.html
I guess it is not a coincidence that nobody under age forty is present at this conference.
Turn up the sound?
There should be a volume button(s) on your device or computer, look for the + and -.
IPCC does not predict apocalypse. It predicts severe dislocation over a reasonably long timescale.
No More War
was that Tom Stier I saw in the audience?
I don't see many youngsters there, here's hoping they make up the biggest number of viewers.
spex357 a fair few study the Hillsdale course. signed up at 34, five years ago
@spex357 said:
_I don't see many youngsters there, here's hoping they make up the biggest number of viewers._
Afraid that, in the UK and many civilised countries, the young are indoctrinated by man-made climate disaster scare-mongering, PC, and Marxism in schools, collages and universities. The media is also full of fabricated climate scares.
@@phonicwheel933 Indeed, the propaganda machine was in full swing by 1974.without it the vote in 1975 would have gone against them.
Youngsters have been brainwashed by Leftie Green teachers & bombarded daily from MSM. In Australia they are out protesting & glueing themselves to the street for "climate justice" Some invading farms & demanding mining be stopped. Much of Australia's wealth is from mining - obviously they haven't thought it through. Their lives would change to that of someone in the 3rd world if all their demands were met. Need some adults to take control. Yet when that happens eg Trump, Boris they are denigrated & attacked relentlessly.
Top man.
almost forgot about the acid rain scare... reminds me of that michael douglas flick - which also pushed the unstoppable dominance of japan hoax - 'black rain'.
Even if sea levels rise and our world climate changes to cover most of the Earth in rain forest. How would we not adapt? No one is claiming it would be too hot to survive. I live in a northern climate, it gets freaking cold in the winter, i'd love to live in a climate more like Florida. I am being open minded about global warming, and I'm not a scientist, but the worst case scenarios that are being thrown out don't seem like anything we couldn't adapt to. An ice age would be worse for us, and they are saying that won't happen for another 100,000 years or more because of the orbit of the Earth.
Mann should be in the state Penn. Not open state. Now proven. Thank you Dr Tim Ball.
Friction between the believers and the skeptics in the scientific community completely invalidates the value of the 'Peer Reviews' system
thus leaving the process open to corruption.
In the 1950 one of my older relatives a farmer,say the worst thing i know is the communists!
"I've been asked to talk to you about environmentalism, and the politics of recurring environmental scares. Of course the biggest and most recent one being global warming."
Newer research ( this video is several years old now) implicates wind turbine farms causing air speed reduction in their locations, and actually increasing the risk of environmental warming. Laws are not about the birds, not about global warming. Thanks for your candor.
What are Darwall's qualifications as an environmentalist?
What do environmental qualifications matter. It's a subject of largely pseudo science. Logic, reason, deduction and observation is within anyone's grasp and no one ought to be excluded from demanding direct untampered evidence or from questioning a scientific hypothesis particularly when, as in ACC case, there is no history of any predictive accuracy to support it. After Greta Thulberg has no qualifications yet she had the attention of the UN.
Who's watching this from 2020 covid land?
I live in U.S. I spent a whole day in London (outside and driving around). Around dinner time, I became violently ill. I couldn’t stop vomiting and had a massive, entire head headache. It was awful! To this day, if I smell spent diesel, I get headache and mild nausea. I cannot even travel behind a truck that’s spewing diesel or some busses. London has so many vehicles fueled by diesel, it’s shocking. All of their taxis and every mass transit bus and many of personal cars. Give me a gasoline-fueled car with catalytic converter any day!!
The problem is cheap fuel is poor quality one.
I would settle for natural gas as fuel. Whatever happened to hydrogen fuel?
In a speech delivered on November 16, 1934, Winston Churchill questions his country's policy of appeasing Hitler and raises concerns over the rising power of Nazi Germany. Then the big twit Chamberlain sucked up to the common mentality and so on. However, nobody knew, except Churchill and some others, what the consequences of their inaction would be.
We can't sit and criticize characters of the past based on our 20/20 hindsight, but we can surely apply the lessons learned.
In the current battle with Leftist/ Liberal/ Democrat/ Globalist/ Cultural Marxist elements over control of America's guiding narratives we are dealing with crooked people who fabricate, manipulate, falsely accuse, and defraud every sucker who presents himself.
Hitler was a bad character who took advantage of past events and declared Germany as victims. He was a hate-monger.
CNN: Hate mongers.
Mainstream media: Hate mongers
"Science" has been weaponized. Major point.
18:59 The determinant factor is the cause, not the effect. Followed by example of blatant hypocrisy
It is not about the environment or the planet. It is war.
Hopefully Trump will stay in office and someone with real clairvoyance will put a clamp down on all the federal bureaucracies.
They will be the downfall of America. Note Comey, McCabe, the IRS, and the countless other examples of little Hitlers who have had no control over their efforts to please themselves.
Thank you, Mr Rupert Darwall, for an excellent talk, and presenting for us the truth about fake environmentalists over the last several decades.
Much of the hysteria about seasonal climate change forgets that climate is driven by the seasons and the geographical position of the sun throughout the year. Cloud generation and therefore flooding accelerates when the sun crosses the equator and cloud generation increases as it follows the sun, providing localized seasonal changes in rainfall on changing seasonal regional land surfaces. It is often said by some that cosmic radiation causes cloud nucleation, however, the moisture/humidity has to exist if indeed new cloud is formed by this method. World weather maps generated from satellite data, confirm that the amount of cloud generated around the tropics has increased exponentially, with the loss of forest and as a result of land mass displacement following of the current crustal displacement caused by the current pole shift.
Whilst cyclical historic climatic patterns are a guide to future climate, so many factors and accurate data are missing from historic data and projected computer models. Our planet and its climate change is affected by its variable orbit around the sun, solar activity cycles, variations in earthquake and volcanic activity, pole shift, solar and cosmic radiation, impact from passing planetary debris, to name but a few of the causes. Seasonal cyclical climatic variations throughout the calendar year depend on location, the Sun's position during the day and night and the elliptical orbit and distance between the Earth and the Sun. The increase in the release of CO2 by man, has a minute affect on weather. The release of methane from livestock whose population numbers are similar to the human population are far more damaging than the CO2 man produces. In addition, we are led to believe the alleged heat trapped by the 1 in 2,500 molecules of CO2 in the atmosphere makes a bee line for the CO2 molecules and does not go anywhere near the 2,499 molecules of other atmospheric gases! Radiant heat from the Earth's surface does bounce around CO2 molecules, but ultimately it escapes. The Clouds have an infinitely greater ability to trap heat since cloud as we are all very aware, clouds help prevent frosts and prevents the sun from warming the Earth's surface!
Of greater affect on the world climate is the destruction of forest, particularly around the tropics where lack of trees to absorb the sun's radiation causes tropical (not global) warming and the absorption of much more moisture from the tropical seas as a result of higher air and sea temperature. Global solar minimum records may have been a guide to future climate from past records, however, the affects of the pole shift are altering global conditions and projections from historic records and cycles. At the last GSM, we were not experiencing the extreme temperatures and extreme weather events now being recorded! Also, we did not experience such a huge increase in earthquake and volcanic activity. (Sometimes as many as 4000 earthquakes over 2.5 on the Richter scale each month instead of 200, 16 years ago and over 70 erupting volcanoes each month as opposed to 3, 16 years ago.) Huge cracks and sink holes have also increased year by year in the last 16 years as a result of the stress on the crust from the current crustal slip.
So one cause for the escalation of extreme weather events is simple...less trees in the tropics each year....less to absorb the suns radiation = tropical warming (NOT GLOBAL WARMING!). Higher temperature around the tropics = more moisture evaporated from the oceans producing much warmer, denser and increased cloud production (hence more flooding in tropics where tree cover is reduced).....then more and denser ‘tropical rainforest clouds’ carrying more moisture, escape the tropics as intense heat on cleared land creates lift to allow these clouds to escape the tropics on trade winds...hence regional cooling effect away from the tropics as cloud cover increases and increased rain and snow fall away from the tropics, whilst extra cloud cover also traps the extra heat travelling up from the tropics. Less trees in the tropics each year = less biomass to sequester the CO2. As the ocean warms, the warmer seas travel north to the Arctic and south to the Antarctic. As warmer air from the tropics travels north and south, air is warmer in the Arctic and in the Antarctic....simples!’ The warmer air and seas distorts the position of the jet stream pushing it north towards west Canada and north towards the UK but there is a counteractive force pushing the jet stream south at some geographical locations as a result of the increase in cloud cover escaping the Tropics, which cools some areas of the ocean through reduced radiation from the sun.
He spoke about acid rain in the 70s , that it was a hoax . I
remember the dying of trees and pollution of rivers and lakes . I seem to remember our country doing something helpful in correcting this problem and it helped . He spoke about pollution , stating that even if we could help the situation in our country , if other countries don't join in why should we . I don't know if that makes sense .
Acid rain wasn't a particularly bad problem for anything but marble monuments when rain falls through sulfur on the way down over a city that's producing a lot of it. It didn't kill off trees or destroy lakes. As far as that is concerned, it's a hoax. China now has insane levels of sulfur emissions. Their cities are gross because they don't capture any fly ash pretty much at all, smoggy messes, but the surrounding countryside isn't suffering from acidification.
What you "remember" is a lie. It was a lie carefully prepared and fed to you. You believed it then and still remember it as true. It never was.
We HAVE had problems with pollution. Chemical factories have dumped nasty stuff into lakes. Plants and refineries released lots of uglies into the air. Ordinary people used rivers as trash cans. Cities dumped their wastewater with minimal treatment into lakes, rivers, and oceans. We mostly got them to stop. (Baltimore is still doing it. So is New York City. So is San Francisco. But most places stopped.) This was good. It's not the SPECIFIC INSTANCES of SPECIFIC KINDS of pollution. It's rather this myth that a widespread, irreversible ecological catastrophe is unfolding that must be stopped through really massive measures. One is real. The other is a hoax.
@@genli5603 said:
_Acid rain wasn't a particularly bad problem for anything but marble_
...
_rather this myth that a widespread, irreversible ecological catastrophe is unfolding that must be stopped through really massive measures. One is real. The other is a hoax._
Great explanation GL. 👍👍
Nixon's environmental programs radically cleaned up a polluted America. Coal was the main cause of acid rain, but scrubbers reduced the problem. I hear we are getting acid rain again from China's polluted air blowing our way.
"
remember the dying of trees and pollution of rivers and lakes . I seem to remember our country doing something helpful "
That was President Nixon's environmental and energy programs forcing the clean up of our environment. Democrat's tagged Nixon as "Imperial" Nixon and fought his every step.'
encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQxgGbyUMVCeLOHkU44Va7V7OtAzpDyroRhEdd9_-7Q9JYZma-g3w
"If this were about global warming, you wouldn't shut down a single nuclear power station"
Quoted for truth.
If global warming is true, the solution isn't prohibitively expensive and intermittent power sources like wind and solar, it's nuclear.
Wind and solar are both cheaper then nuclear now a days. with out government subsidies its cheaper then gas
@@briandiehl9257 No response, huh? Cool.
@@imonlyamanandiwilldiesomed4406 What? What was i supposed to respond to?
@@briandiehl9257 I asked you to support your claims with evidence. I'm confident that I crushed them, with evidence, but I'm curious.
@@imonlyamanandiwilldiesomed4406 I don't see them. You must of accidentally put them in the general comment section, not on this thread.
@22:35
I wonder why the Montreal Protocol has worked fine, and regulated chlorofluorocarbons sucessfully on a global scale.
He said he admires who as his hero? Hurley?
get emails ...missed channel
Feb2016(?)how foretelling.....
If u ain’t scared
You won’t give em your wallet
Are Brits subject to prosecution and persecution upon return to the UK for comments made in the last country where free speech is still legal?
it is basically group of old people agreeing with one another
30:25, i think the question should have been taken in the climate/CO2 hysteria context, and the answer should have been: CO2 is not pollution, lets take care of true pollution reducing the particulates , oxides, ... the true pollutants, which the modern north american engines do nowadays . Take a tier4 john deere engine , run it in calcuta and the exhaust is cleaner than the intake air although empty of O2.
I corrected Reverend Darwall's falsehoods about C(O2 and climate models in a reply video.
+Desertphile You did an excellent job correcting his lies.
+TheWiccanBitch I cannot imagine why a preacher would even bother lying about CO2 and climate change, let alone in a fake "college." What does Rev Darwall get in exchange for deceiving people?
Good video. Thank you for correcting his falsehoods.
Utter silence from the cult.
+Desertphile Hey, he gets his facts from the voices in his hea....wait, no, Jesus told him personally! Checkmate, scientist slave!
Nassau is in THE BAHAMAS !!!!
For 70 years they’ve been telling us about how this That & the other thing will happen none of them happened Gods In Control Of the wether Always has been always will be ty
I think you meen the Sun,.
Are you listening GRETA????
I want every person to live as they preach no hot water no heating no transport and one meal a day don’t forget the food you get is using fossil fuel no technology must be used you will soon shut you mouth if you had to live it
Trump ditches the Paris Accord and saves the world. Might be his best move.
Miracle
Saves every family in America $150.000+
It's unfortunate but I do not see the younger generation in the audience listening?
Replace "environmental scares" for "covid" , and it's the same playbook. Get it yet?
“Champaign Socialists” - “Limousine Liberals” - “Private Plane Progressives” - “Cool Comfort Commies” - We know our history.
.....Norway, they're going zero carbon emissions & the bulk of their income is from North Sea oil, you can't make that stuff up, can you?
Linked to this video at www.quora.com/How-dangerous-is-climate-alarmism-when-it-displaces-common-sense-approaches/answer/TL-Winslow
Increased greenhouse gasses....that means there will be more vegetation in the world, right?...
B"H... "Close the EPA." Milton Freidman
Do wind turbines really kill that many birds?
Yes, unfortunately they do kill birds. But the bigger threat to birds is climate change driven by burning of fossil fuels.
And good thing it's extremely difficult to lower co2 plant life starts die 250ppm and below we are at 350maybe 400ppm plants love up to 2000ppm. Just go to a desert takes 6 hours and it's freezing that's how fast co2 cools. At that cool rate co2 has an 800year lag on the environmet.
A bit extra oxygen would be nice guess what it has a beautiful equalization rate with co2 up to 2000ppm . This is hilarious and sad.
He's not gonna like today's extinction rebellion protests.
I don't see what yall are worried about. No one is going to take away the 2 cubic miles of coal burned every year, or the 1 cubic mile of petroleum. And, no one is going to stop the cutting of 3 cubic miles of wood every year. Quite the contrary all these thing will increase. So, you have nothing to worry about.
The data shows: NO change at rate of sea level change. Satellites and Radiosondes show HALF the warming shown by "Adjusted" measurements by NOAA/GISS. The world has been warming since the Little Ice Age 1600s-1700s, and about 150-200 years later , C02 started appreciably increasing. C02 shows no meaningful causal correlation to temperature at any timeframe, including the contemporary, evidenced by temperature "pauses" for a decade after 2000, and temperature declines for ~4 decades after 1940's, at precisely the time human emissions exploded. And on and on.
My frustration is that everything I was programmed to believe 30 years ago..... hasn’t happened.....and we did make some progress.... women were having few, if any children, and our cars got 40 miles a gallon. Then usher in immigrant families, having many children, people buying huge vehicles. I thought.... wait, I made sacrifices, not everyone is on board..... what happened?
Waste warms. I can't agree with all this speaker is saying, he ignores the public trend to object to the poisoning of the biosphere. He does however blow the lid off the corporate generated regulation through lobbying. In the UK our bins are emptied every two weeks, we regulate our waste accordingly, for the most of us. If our bins were emptied once a month we would regulate our waste accordingly. And accordingly businesses would comply with the peoples desire to generate less waste. The crisis is not global warming it is depletion of global resources. Diesel fuel takes less than half the energy to extract than petrol does, so the answer is to make the diesel car more efficient, not to ban it. Diesel engines last twice as long as petrol engines, but efficiency is not the best part of the capitalist model. De-industrialisation of Europe or America only means the hairdryer is made further away. It's carbon footprint is increased! Every city in the world should have a dedicated hairdryer factory until it can produce an hairdryer that never wears out. The German economy is built on the back of the car industry, not very green, however, if Germany had a coast line, like the UK, they would have tidal generators not windmills. (Note to UK gov, Tidal power stations cheaper, last longer, don't involve mining or de-commissioning and kinder to wildlife than nuclear) All of the advances made in eco friendly alternatives in the last 40 years have been driven by public opinion in spite of the corporations need for ever expanding profits and the EU suppression of public opinion. So, don't be a fashion victim, fix it if it's busted, pass it on if you don't need it any more and don't bin it, recycle it. The rag and bone man with his horse and cart was politically correct in every respect.
Wind farms in South Australia are now providing more than 50% of their power, effect on the environment is negligible, it's more of the aesthetic issue whether you like how they look or not.
Jester123ish
Wind power compared to all other power generated worldwide is something like .04%
Unfortunately, I'm not seeing any young people in the audience listening to this.
Unfortunately Yes it is thruth. There at the audience were just mostly old people and were not the generations which are now in front of the future, the new and future generations. Unfortunately we will continue seeing a clear climate change.
Wow, there are apparently 48 annoying little Swedish brats who don't like this. Stunning.
How DARE you!
Clinate has been changing for 10,000 years not just in someones short lifetime,,,its absurd to try and tax it. political theft..don't let it happen,,,riot and protest..
Content was interesting, delivery felt rushed.
If this is meant to be intellectual history, it is very silly. Just one example: the idea that Hitler was an environmentalist because he was curious about wind power is ludicrous. The problem for Hitler was the lack of oil in Germany. The German divisions headed to the Caucasus to try to grab the oil there. On the failure of this venture, it is not surprising that he soon became interested in alternative sources of power. It was not love of the environment that was driving his curiosity.
climate alarmists are the new nazi party. Luckily thier time has run out and the models have been proven a fraud.ONly the die hard cliamate dunces still think CAGW is a problem for earth. Everyone else has moved on
Just talk about it: Is it a big or a small fire, and who contributed to it. - Yes talk and talk,- and call the fire brigade in the last second or forget it at all, - because you want to waste all time to bring your personal arguments to the attention of as vast an audience as possible, we will die happier then; .... what an achievement!
The Dude "I will take global warming seriously when no-one wants to buy ocean front property and when banks refuse to finance it." Yeah, cause scientific evidence is no match for the real estate market. This is why it's impossible to get through to so many - and probably why the term "oxygen thief" was coined. Anyone who thinks any of this makes any sense - two words "peer review". Look it up.
There is no amount of money that would make me stand up in front of a room full of people and lie to them, like Rupert Darwell did. My self-respect is not for sale.
Yes I agree, what Al Gore is doing is horrible!
Lies? Just because you disagree with someone does NOT mean they are lying.
BTW...What Lies?
Obviously your self respect is self delusion.
Lieing to the whole world is what you do, that is down beyond self respect! You self respect has been already sold, in Carbon tax, Al Gore sheep!
No one's making an offer.