Don Bradman in How I Play Cricket
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 фев 2014
- An excerpt of Don Bradman in 'How I Play Cricket', directed by Paulette McDonagh (Australia 1932).
In this clip, a young Donald Bradman demonstrates the innovative methods he used to develop his reflexes, hand-eye coordination and concentration when he was an aspiring cricketer growing up in Bowral. Bradman is shown hitting a golf ball against a water tank with a cricket stump, and demonstrates taking some classic catches from a paling fence.
Paulette McDonagh was one of three remarkable sisters who made history in 1926 by becoming the first Australian women to own and run a film production company. Professionally known as the 'McDonagh Sisters', they were among the first to produce a 'talkie' in Australia. Their collaborations led to both feature-length dramas and documentaries, with Paulette working as the director and writer, Phyllis as a producer and Isabel acting under the name 'Marie Lorraine'.
Excerpt from Don Bradman in 'How I Play Cricket' (Australia 1932). NFSA title: 44179.
For further information about this clip or for enquiries about commercial use, please refer to access@nfsa.gov.au.
Explore The Encyclopedia of Women and Leadership in Twentieth-Century Australia:
www.womenaustralia.info/leaders/ 
Кино
![NoCap - Maliboo [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FUV7E0QyniU/mqdefault.jpg)
GOAT is the most overused term in sport, this man is the undeniable greatest of all time
l agree with you 1000 per cent God bless warren and ingrid Melbourne Australia 👍🇦🇺🤠😻
This is the real 'classic' masterclass by a legend
vidya pandhari and it’s free , how goods that ! Lol
Love Bradman's lack of ego or embarrassment to show off his personal cricket game.
shut up u emo
This bradman chap seems talented
He should start playing cricket
waiting for someone to get wooshed
Bro he is already considered one of the greatest cricketers
Nobody was taking the bait i feel bad so i only taken it :D
the guy below you got wooshed
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Joke of the century
I laughed for 30 minutes after reading this
Real god of cricket
1:37 houses and neighborhoods looked so nice back then. Less looked better.
Did you think you got tinnitus by the ringing?
Thank you very much for the Lesson' Sir.
Love 🥰 sir Bradman. RIP🙏
I love you don
my favourite batsman still
Gold!!
Thankyou Sir...😇👍
I used to practice with a tennis racquet and volleyball 😁😁😁
You will then never hit a single ball 😅😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
This is real legend ❤️❤️
Beautiful, Bradman is the best
Our don Brahman...
Whaaat!
I actually used to play the same.
i am going to play for Australia just like him
Doesn't work like that. You'l see dunderheads / favorites constantly getting the nod ahead of you. And even then that be only in any regional or metropolitan area where anybody even gives a damn. The jealous smart-arse at the other end shall deliberately run you out and then sanctimoniously go " Too slow Too slow ". You'll cop trigger finger[s] giving you out lbw on deliveries way down the leg side. Its shit. Forget about it.
@@jonglewongle3438 i am gun leg spinner i will make it
@@checkpoops6752 Well, someone's gotta do it. When it gets down to it its a matter of pumping that ball 22 yards down the wicket in such a manner as to maximise the stroke play difficulty for the batsman on strike. And the entire heirarchy is a pyramid thing. You gotta get into first grade in any region. And it goes usually right on down to at least 4th grade. First grade ANYWHERE in the State is technically, at least, the next thing down from no less than First Class. No bull here. There ain't no other divisional rungs in between, on cursory examination, except for maybe academies, etc, which is maybe where most of the bias and favoritism comes in. But outside the Capital cities you gotta shine like all buggery to get noticed, because, in the context of the entire State, there is a multiplicity of first grade compared to First Class and the metropolitan would tend to hog it..
@@checkpoops6752 good mindset
@@mattrandel8999 cheers
Kelly slater talked about this on the Joe Rogan podcast!
Hi Tayne. Do you have a link? We'd love to listen to it!
thanks.
ruclips.net/video/H3qI3RWgNok/видео.html
Kelly brings it up, and then Joe cuts him off. Timestamp is 19 minutes 30 seconds
Says video is silent???
I used to do the second training when i was 6 or 7
💙💙❤❤Marvalleous
I brought a video tape from Sam Loxton and this was on it.
which ball is this
a golf ball
ping pong ball
@Thediamondcrafto 4life oh ye sorry. i was thinking of his brain
Squash ball
Stats dont lie and no one else even comes close.
Let me watch this video.....silence plz
Practice
Doesn't show him hitting the ball more than once continuously.
that was a common misconception, he used underarm the ball at the round surface and then when it bounced back at him unpredictably he would use the stump and play the correct shot that being a straight drive, cut shot, late cut etc, depending on where the ball was. re-watch the clip and you will see what I mean.
I don’t understand whether he’s meant to continuously hit the golf ball against the stand over and over again or just try hit it once.
Exactly I didn't see him hit the ball twice and the commentary and legend is he could do it for hours or rather couldn't miss it any more.. its kind of exaggeration though there is no doubt he is indeed a legend of the game
@@mirzab6475 i dont think he could do for hours with missing
@@jamesdaly7440 Yeah and I don't think he did for hours and yet there is no video of him hitting the ball more than once
I remember reading years ago that he would hit it something around 8-14 times without missing.
@@sweatpatch123 seems a reasonable amount of times
The price of corrugated water tanks just went through the roof lol
You’ll never see this technique used again as they have apps you can download now with VR headsets and VR motion sticks lol 😂 this is why you’ll never see another Bradman play cricket from any country ever again .
Hehehe sadly yes. There wont be another bradman.
Where did Sir Bradman find this thin bamboo shaped bat🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
So what?
This practice can only benefit you when there are only spinners in the opposition. And that is what bradman played actually
No he played also fast bowler 🙄
Harold Larwood turns in his grave. 🤨
@@vishveshtadsare3160 Ignore him
he is like modernists you will find in football , Arrogance
Bradman played mostly against pace bowlers. He was actually considered weakest against quality spin bowlers. For example his top score of 334 in 1930 had the following bowlers
- Larwood - one of the fastest of the game
- Tate - accurate swing bowler with Test average of 26.2. Took 5 wickets in that innings
- Geary - quality fast-medium bowler
- Tyldesley - legspin with tremendous success at county level. Limited opportunities to play for England
- Hammond - part-time pace bowler, but very strong and capable of bowling very quickly and took 83 wickets at 37.8
- Leyland - part-time off spinner.
99.94 average means he dominated every style pace speed etc period.
Jardine and Larwood put a full stop. Period. Dot.
We taught these coolies how to play.
Pffft. Larwood and Jardine are footnotes in the life of Bradman. The only reason their names are still remembered is because they happened to brush into him once.
Bradman could not handle the pace of Larwood, so because of all the problems that series caused, the MCC never picked Larwood for England again and soon after got rid of Jardine.
Bradman still averaged 56.57 that series. That's not under the thumb by any other players' standards.
Jardine didn't have much to teach Australia. Never scored a ton against them, in fact he managed just the one from over 30 test innings. Ten fifties was a decent effort but those are Shane Watson figures for converting.
Worth noting that if animosity was directed at Larwood it didn't stick. Though ostracised in his homeland he was treated very well when he migrated to Australia in the 1950s where he lived for the rest of his days.
They had to change the rule book to stop the Leg Theory method or the game on bouncier wickets would have lost direction. A pity it didnt stop the 4 short balls an over bollux by the windies from '76 on.
shut up m8
I remain very sceptical about Bradman's ability and records. I never saw him bat, of course, but neither did those who will rush to condemn me for my scepticism. What has been established over the years is that Australian home umpires were cheats who gave blatanly cheating decisions in favour of Australian cricketers and against non-Australian cricketers. They got away with it for decades and for all lof Bradman's era. That casts a large shadow of doubt and questions about how much of Bradman's achievements was real and how much was contrived by dishonest Australian umpires, It was that dishonesty that forced the introduction of "neutral" umpires. How many times did Bradman walk during his test career when he knew he was out even though the umpire said not out? The truly great batsmen walk when umpires either make mistakes or try to cheat. I do not believe that 99 test average was achieved fairly.
Bradman's test average at home: 98.23
Bradman's test average away: 102.85
You buddy, are a fool...
During Bradman’s time, there were no helmets, no guards, thin pads, thin bats, incredibly fast bowlers, uneven pitch, slowest outfield, and possibly longer boundaries than now. And you said Australian umpires were dishonest and biased?? If they were too biased on Australian players then most of the Australian batsman would have had more than 70-80 test average and they would’ve scored 1000 runs every innings. You’re simply nothing but a hater can’t accept the fact that Sir Don Bradman is the greatest batsman of all time.
I’m sure you know nothing about that time. His away test averaged is higher than his home, with the opposition home umpire should have cheated in the favour of the home opposition, I.e your arguments is flawed.
Very stupid assertions.Bradman scored 974 runs against England in England.Period!!!
Probably the most nonsensical post ever posted in the history of not only the internet but the history of the world. We are all 70% dumber for having read this