Tucker Carlson Interviews Putin [Full Summary]
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 фев 2024
- ⚠️ EXPIRING SOON ⚠️ Wealth, Income, and Investing Courses with private livestreams at meetkevin.com ⚠️
Real Estate Startup at househack.com
eHack News at eHack.com
📺 RUclips Channels to Follow📺
✅ Market Open Live: / @meetkevinlive
✅ Podcast: / @meetkevinpodcast
✅ HouseHack: / @househackhomes
✅✅My Product & Service Links✅✅
💎 Courses on Wealth: meetkevin.com💎
🟢 ACTUAL Financial Advice with Kevin: stackhack.com
🚨 My Startup: househack.com
📰 My Daily Newsletter: meetkevin.com/daily
➡️Favorite 3rd-Party Products (Affiliate / Paid Commissioned Links):
🎥 Our Real Estate 3D Scan Camera: metkevin.com/3d
✝️ Life Insurance in as little as 5 Minutes: metkevin.com/life
📸 Webcam metkevin.com/webcam
⚠️⚠️⚠️#putin #meetkevin #ehack ⚠️⚠️⚠️
WOW, full breakdown summary of the Vladimir Putin Tucker Carlson Interview.
📝Disclaimer:
This video is not personalized advice for the viewer.
![Tucker Carlson Interviews Putin [Unbiased Fact Check].](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GHaBFtO0cv0/mqdefault.jpg)
What I couldn't believe was how quickly and accurately Kevin summarized the content of the interview within two minutes of its conclusion. Unbelievable memory and organization!
Wow. And how might Kevin do all of that within two minutes of the conclusion of this interview. Kevin isn't giving an accurate assessment, he's giving an opinionated assessment.
While I do admire Kevin for his concise breakdowns, don't put it down to memory, as he was taking notes the whole way through; something many modern journalists wouldn't understand
It is kind of impressive. I started watching the interview 6 minutes after it was released
@@Samantha30090it’s literally a summary. There was EXTREMELY little if any opinion in this of his own. He summarized opinions of Putin maybe but didn’t inject like any of his own
@@Samantha30090 A very detailed, accurate, opinionated assessment. When are you going to post yours? 🤔😆
My CNN and MSNBC told me Putin was on his death bed. Meanwhile, Putins gave an two hour interview, and Biden looking like the Walking dead. 😅
🤣 🤣 🤣 🎯
It's crazy how the US media lies
Biden often hangs out with dead European politicians, that's why he looks so bad. Ouija sessions are not easy for Joe.
Communist traitor
Well, according to the DOJ, Biden is mentally unfit to stand trial. So they aren’t going to bother charging him.
Trudeau is such a joke having that SS member in parliament.
Have you seen his pink socks? 😂 He looks like pedo
I still don't believe that was by mistake. That was done on purpose
Canada welcomed tens of thousands of those after WWII. They fled from USSR justice. Today their canadian-ukrainian kids and grandkids rule Canada and change history of their grands - like they were patriotic heroes, who fought against USSR (under allegiance to Austrian artist, wearing his uniform).
Trudeau needs to go , as a Canadian I would like to apologize to russia who lost 27 million people in world war two. Putin has more brains than puppet Biden and elitist Trudeau have their whole body. Great job Kevin , thankyou.
ruclips.net/video/d7sFxJbcYvg/видео.html
Don’t forget that German & France came out stating that the Minsk agreements were just to buy time for Ukraine to rearmed itself
The Ukrainian fools intended to outfox Russia but, eventually, it is the people of Ukraine who, finding themselves decieved though not understanding this, are paying with their own blood for their masters' interests!
Did they?? I didn't know that. No honour makes me choose every time. Solomon sez We are one in a thousand
@@pauleckersley6132
FRANCE AND GERMANY ADMIT THE MINSK AGREEMENT BOUGHT TIME FOR UKRAINE
Former Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany admitted that the Minsk Agreement in 2014 was a facade. She told Die Zelt, “The 2014 Minsk Agreement was an attempt to buy time for Ukraine. Ukraine used this time to become stronger, as you can see today. Ukraine in 2014-2015 and Ukraine today are not the same.”
Merkel continued, “It was clear for everyone” that the conflict was merely suspended “but it was exactly what gave Ukraine the priceless time.”
Francois Hollande, the former President of France, said, “Yes, Angela Merkel is right on this point.”
Hollande continued, “Since 2014, Ukraine has strengthened its military posture. Indeed, the Ukrainian army was completely different from that of 2014. It was better trained and equipped. It is the merit of the Minsk agreements to have given the Ukrainian army this opportunity.”
@@pauleckersley6132 Did you hear Solomon saying it? As for me, it always sounds amusing when someone relies upon the text called the Bible the authors of which aren't known. The Christian/Judaic tradition says this and that but nothing may be admitted definitely. To believe and to know are absolutely different things.
@@pauleckersley6132 look for an interview with Merkel. She was the first to admit publicly that no one was going to comply with the Minsk agreements.
Hi Kevin! Russia is not a subject of Minsk Agreements (unlike Ukraine and “districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine”), but guarantor and a part of Trilateral Contact Group alongside with France and Germany, that were supposed to monitor and support the whole process.
The first paragraph of Minsk II states:
“Immediate and full ceasefire in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine and its strict fulfilment as of 00:00 midnight EET on 15 February 2015.”
Actions required from the Trilateral Contact Group are mentioned later in the process, therefore the statement made by Putin “we were ready to implement them” makes perfect sense!
The full text of Minsk II is available online. Recommend everyone to get familiar!
Russia has signed two Minsk agreements.
Stop watching propaganda, or better yet, read it.
Also russia is subject on Budapest Memorandum, which russia broke
Yep. And if you read the reports of some of the people actually leading the negotiations you will find that Russia pushed aggression all the way through the negotiations.
Russia IS a subject. It put its signature as a SIDE of the Agreement
@@Master.09614Russia has signed as a guarantor, not as a party. Stop watching propaganda, indeed.
When putin said he didn't know who was running the USA he wasn't just talking about biden. He started with bill Clinton and bush. He had some agreements with them but when they discussed it with their "Teams" they then changed their tunes.
People behind curtains lead Usa.
I agree.... I cought that while watching the interview. He basically outted the US on a few things. Mainstream media and that the president is not the one in charge... Not just where Biden is concerned. Yeah and the CIA is a big problem... And we keep hearing it's the FBI that's a issue looks like it is both!
Putin knows it is the globalist.
Yup that shit is scary . Who is actually in charge
At least when trump was president, we knew who was in charge
Hey Kevin, small correction. If you go back and listen to what Putin said about "illegitimate UN" comment, you'll see he was saying that US and western sanctions on Russia are not legitimate UN sanctions. It is not Russia's position that the UN is illegitimated, Russia does not have that position.
Russia did have good discussions and understanding with the USA until Clinton, then everything went sour and has been so ever since.
Did he said any lies???
That was Jeltsin, not Putin.
Kevin is an absolute ignorant IDIOT!
Well the UN is illegitimate. Remember that day when we all voted for them to destroy the world? Yea me either or anyone else for that matter so why the heck are we saying they are legit? Only thing legit about them is they are legit nazis
I think you slightly missinterpreted what Putin said about negotiations and US weapons. His response was in relation to Tuckers question " why don't you call and sort things out" and he said "what is there to sort out, they can stop sending weapons and then we can negotiate" in the sense that if US keeps sending weapons, it's pretty clear they are not open to negotiations. I wouldn't say this means automatically that they would not be opened to ideeas otherwise, since they already almost finalised a peace deal in Istanbul previously, but rather it is implied that the other side is not interested in negotiations because they keep sending weapons and this is a mesaage to Russia that they are not willing to talk. Those weapons come in packages with many months between them. It's not like the second america announces that they won't send weapons and they are open to negotiations ukraine will have no legs to stantld on instantly .They could resume the sending of additional weapons anytime. It's obvious that if america keeps sending weapons, Russia wont go and tell them " hello, i heard you sent weapons again, you want to negociate?" I think he even said something along the lines of "what eo you want us to do, to beg, no no we're afraid?" I think Russia wants to see America making the first step, and rightfully so, since their last attempt at a peace deal wqs basically thrown to the garbage bin by Boris Johnson. That's how i interpret it anyway.
If America stop sending weapons - Ukraine will still fight. Why? Because they dont want to die. Just yesterday was sitting with my friends from Melitople (Ukraine) russians didnt care where to shoot. Civilians or not. They just want to conquer. Everything putin says are just excuses.
Just check putins actions - he constantly lies.
Is it hard to understand?
Anybody can Google this:
U.S. launched 251 military interventions since 1991, and 469 since 1798
A report stated from the United States Congress Research Records that US launched more than 251 military interventions since 1991 to 2022 and total of 469 since the year of 1798. Yet Russia's military interventions from 1991 to 2022, is only 14 but the United States is 251, it's ridiculous how the United States calls Russia an aggressor and they have 251 military interventions. Half of the United States military interventions were after 1991 (which was the end of the cold war) but it proves that the United States took full of advanced of its military invasions after 1991 because of its superpower status around the planet. There wasn't another country that could stop them but during the cold war, the Soviet Union put the United States on check mark to keep the world peace. So the United States was getting away with it's aggression after the cold war for nobody to stop them 1991 using the planet as it war playground.
See who's the world's aggressor then who's number one after the cold war? Because it's not Russia and it's not China either? Can you guess, let's see, it's the good old United States. Nor are China or Russia have alliances in Mexico or Canada building military bases or even in South America in the United States backyard, not an inch of them near the United States but they could, think uncle Sam would like it? The US has invaded 27 countries since 1990 the end of the cold war, they have 759 bases around the world in 85 countries but not a single foreign ally or foreign country has a single military base on any US soil, ever question why? Again this is about the United States spreading its sphere of influence in Ukraine and in Europe.The United States has betrayed President Gorbachev in March 8, 1991 along with France Germany and Britain all promised not one inch of NATO would move East but today there's 13 post Soviet Union countries in the block and another non former Soviet Union county totalling 14 all are a violation of the non NATO expansion agreement of March 8, 1991 which is signed, recorded, a handshake and champagne glasses all quoting to peace guaranteed by United States France Germany and Britain that they would not move NATO one inch east but 32 years later not so. How did that happen, it's called the global interest to surround Russia on reverse engineering of the Soviet Union move east while weak till you gain your power back. Talk about a complete betrayal, the United States is trying to police the world and for whom, you and me, bullshit it is.
Let's not forget the United States has not paid any reparations to any of these countries they invaded, nor was United States sanctioned and there were no countries that funded unlimited weapons on countries the United States invaded including unlimited money to these countries in need and lastly the United States advised not to invade countries such as the United Nations and many other countries told the United States not to invade but they didn't listen but hey, who's in charge of the UN, NATO, the European Union anyway, I think we know the answer to that question
No country has bombed more countries since 1945 than the United States, no country comes close. Yes Americans like myself say no to Washingtons war crimes
Thank you 🙌
Most is known and public info but ignored by mass because they "trust" & "believe"...
The believe is false, the trust is misplaced and anyone looking will learn that is fact.
Hence why they do not want ppl to do their own re-- sear-- ching
So this is pretty dishonest because if you read the ACTUAL report its not 'every time the US invades a country'.
For example, Bosnia comes up at least 10 times in the report from 1992 onwards, Kosovo, Iraq, Somalia etc also appear numerous times. Furthermore any military exercise with an ally such as BALTOPS, US military exercises with Kuwait etc are also counted.
If one accounted for duplicates (instances involving the same conflict) it goes down to 53 instances, and even this is somewhat worthless because it accounts for entire theaters (instances are sometimes labeled as whole continents), some are flagged as 'counter-terrorism' and others are...NATO allies. considering all that it roughly brings down the count to about 20 (estimating because I'm sick of counting). This also excludes instances where the U.S and its allies were doing good things, many of these instances are simply air-dropping humanitarian aid and others are purely evacuating American citizens or defending UN peacekeeping forces.
This is why you dont read 'Global Research'.
You should read my response to this comment
@alekzgavriel-russo7453 You are right to some extent (Numbers) it goes down to 53/20 instances.
But if you add the proxy's that number goes (WAY) up again.
All that is besides the point...
The point is, US is aggressor since the mid 40's.
Imagine if a US president agreed to be inteviewed by a Russian journalist in Washington DC.
That would be Mad TV show.
It happens a lot during press conferences, it's likely that those interviews never get published because Biden sticks to the facts
Current president wouldn't last 5 minutes.
The current president is not capable of doing interviews.
Putin needs to explain something to the world, not US president.
The Minsk agreement as per Angela Merkel herself , was signed by them as guarantors, it was done so to give Ukraine time to get trained and armed .
And why don t you mention that the Minsk accords were signed by Russia also as an outsider while they were actually the aggressor ? Why don t you mention that Putin was lying to their faces when he was claming there were no russian soldiers in Ukraine ? WHy dont you mention the fact that he was lying when he claimed russia had no involvment ?
obviously having the Minsk agreement was better than putler ripping up the agreement and invading Ukraine.
Ukraine was armed to the teeth with Nuclear Missiles, they turned their missiles into Russia who is now torturing them because Bill Clinton said the Unite States would protect them. Had they kept those weapons, this would not be happening.
Don't mention Budapest memorandum: it does't fit well within Putin's propaganda.
Which they obviously needed. Ukraine used to have nuclear weapons, but they gave them up as Russia guaranteed their safety.
@12:25 - not precisely correct understanding of translation “stop supplying & in few weeks war is done…” but Putin added right in few seconds that “we could agree once agreement is made how to get organised the process”. @Kevin the same misunderstanding at the time of summary 21:03
Yup. Charlie Brown kept falling for Lucy's BS.... Putin is not Charlie Brown. Kevin is off for sure.
Putin did not say "the war will be done". He said "everything will be done". We, Ukrainians know for sure "everything" means our lives, our independece, our country.
Alles ist einfach! Wenn Sie aufhören, die Ukraine zu unterstützen, wird sie aufhören zu kämpfen und zu Friedensabkommen zu gehen, und Russland ist bereit, über Frieden zu verhandeln.
I wish they had touched on the topic of how Russia defaulted in 1998 and after it settled things with the IMF Putin made sure Russia would never accrue massive debt loads like all Western nations. Russia has the lowest level of debt per GDP of all industrialized nations while here in the U.S. and in the E.U. hyperinflation is around the corner Weimar Germany style.
Because ru can`t produce nothing... They BUYING steel nails... Even can`t produce them.
I can agree with most of this, but to say the US and or the EU are being threatened with German hyperinflation is beyond hyperbolic. Please go read up on what happened after WW1. Completely different scenarios, with vastly different amounts of money when looking at their GDP's.
Russia had high inflation too
😂😂😂.
Russia's debt has defeated the debts of many countries.
WOW! So interesting! Thank you, mr. totally not a russian bot!
One thing I can guarantee is that we would not have tolerated Russia expanding like that towards our borders
That's actually what russia is doing, right now.... They invade Ukraine!
justs look at cuba, still sanctioned to this day, for something that happened in the 60s
Remember the Cuban crisis
@@ionvlad141 well I’m in my 30s so I don’t remember it first hand but I very much so remember how important it was in history class
Yet we allow invasion from the border
It would be great to see Tucker interviewing president Biden for couple hours and asking him as many questions…
😂😂😂😂😂
Great idea!
LOL. Biden cannot answer 1 question.
Biden wouldn't do it even on his fisher price phone.
We wish
About the ''2'' Putin part. The negotiations from 18 months ago were still when Putin was trying to end the war with a compromise, while now he doesn't want to compromise anymore and want total control of the region.
At least that's what I understood from the interview.
That is how I understood it as well
This is probably the best summary of Tucker Carlson's interview with Putin I came across..thank you
Putin did not say UN is illegitimate. He said it was USA that said that UN is essentially obsolete when they illegally commited agression against Serbia in 1999, in a case that has similarities with Ukraine Russia situation. Essentially, USA made a precedent that Russia copy pasted in 2022, and Putin has made this point several times before. Several other inaccuracies, but otherwise nice recap.
I don't trust this clown.
Putin is a liar 🤷🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
EXACTLY. PUTIN never ever, not in this interview or ever call UNITED NATION ILLEGITIMATE. If it's is ILLEGITIMATE than how Russia is part of it and on Security COUNCEL? DOES KEVIN KNOW that USSR WAS one of major creators of UN as a WINNER OF WW2!?
More Contradictions - When Russia goes back a 1000 years. Putin - Mad Dictator. When Israel goes back 2000 years-It's their land.
Are you legitimately comparing the Balkan crisis of the 90s, which included mass ethnic cleansing and genocide, to the Ukrainian situation? Do you have any comprehension of world history?
Missed the most important part, where he talked about the CIA running everything.
That is a hallmark Russian misinformation strategy... simply blame it on a secretive organization to spread fear into the public when in reality the CIA doesn't have that power they simply relay confidential information to the people who choose to or to not sign the papers. The fact you take Putins word at face-value is laughable but only speaks to the lack of faith we have in our own country, which we need to change.
Most likely they do.
Serbs are the oldest nation in Europe.
Serbs have the oldest calendar, 7533 AD.
Serbia gave 18 Roman emperors. Emperor Dusan, Emperor Constantine.
Serbs have the oldest posmo in the world, (Vinca script) Scientists, Nikola Tesla, Milankovic, Pupin, M Anstein, Saint Sava.
Serbia gave the world the most, that's why nomads and sons of whores hate it.
Serbia is an old holy land, Kosovo is the heart of Serbia, Kosovo is the richest in ore in the world, that's why they are stealing it from the Serbs.
Albania was artificially created only in 1912.
Skadar was the capital of Serbia from 490 to 1171. Skadar is in Albania. Amen.
the bank gangsters run everything, who do you think pays the CIA and the media@@ABanRocks
imagine having the means to illegally spy on almost anyone in the country and outside of it(snowden proved it was done). the amount of 'dirt' they can have on anyone.... its quite possible that they make real decisions (and big companies by means of lobbying). talking about democracy and human rights and shit when they dont factually have one and human right are constantly broken in USA - is the height of hypocrisy.
The is excellent. I am amazed by your ability to recap and connect stuff, Kevin!
Just subbed KEVIN!! Much love!!!
The former nazi guy the SS guy getting a standing ovation is sickening
Canada sucks.
Putin best buddies walk around with SS rune tattoos, and why is Wagner called Wagner ? Any coincidence that it was Hitlers favorite composer ? How's that sickening for ya?
Putin cant have buddies with SS tatoos. UA provocator you are seems
I know a lot of Zelensky's friends with such tattoos, but I do not know any of Putin's friends with these tattoos@@dmytrodolzhenko349
Trudeau and the NWO are FASCIST TRASH!
The fact that you didn't put in the Bill Clinton part....truth CIA war
He could have just said Ukraine is a Nazi state, it's not like we don't already know that.
How am I nazi? My grandparents were fighting fascists and now a random bum on the internet calls me a nazi smh
@@Bignut2025 You're only a Nazi if you support a Nazi state, like Ukraine. So, in reality ,you are calling yourself a Nazi. Great Job.
I refuse to base my opinion on what an individual says directly. I demand to know what I am supposed to think based on the accepted views and insight provided to me by corporate media!
But why is that individual any more trustworthy than corporate media?
People can lie, just as much as companies can.
@@thelonecookie3592 And that is why we look at their actions to determine their character.
you base it on their actions and not what they say
Feel free to read true history books, not that bullshit history that ru makes up...
@@thelonecookie3592
Precisely, and corporate media have standards to ensure, as far as possible, that what they report is factually correct. Of course corporate media tend to be biased in one way or another - and will express those biases in what facts they choose to report and how they interpret those facts. However the biases of corporate media are generally well-known and can be allowed for, but the facts they report can generally be relied on - but one needs to distinguish between hard fact and third party reports - which may or may not be hard fact. This difference is usually clear.
Individuals may be interesting as regards their opinions, but can't be relied on for facts - because in almost all cases they simply do not have the resources to uncover real facts.
The US media tell us that Biden is sharp as a tack... That should tell you everything.
No , they don't.
Not one media chanel says that. Now you are just making things up
The US media just thinks Biden is the better choice because of how corrupt Trump is
never heard that 😂
They tell us that the economy is great and that Biden's policies are working, which is just a tad false.
Fantastic job. You should send this to CNN and NBC.
HA HA HA.
Why would you suggest that. An apology is in order.
They would clip out some parts and make Kevin a bad person that hates america, they sill say Kevin is a propaganda seller on the side of Tucker
Thank you for your work! Well done hun. Love and peace from Germany. ✌️❤️🇩🇪
Ang pinakamahalaga Subscribed! 👍👍😀😂
Watch the interview for yourselves people. Do not go through a 3rd party when the sources is out there for yourself
ruclips.net/video/fOCWBhuDdDo/видео.html
For real bro, these people are too lazy...and we wonder why 🇺🇸 America has gone to shit.
No
@@mongolsmffm4829its a 2 hour fucking interview i got shit to do
@@mongolsmffm4829 yes so lazy that they dont want to.. sit down and watch an interview for two hours...
Putin didn't say we were ready to implement it. Ive noticed few times wrong translation, when he was talking about Ukraine, the translator would say "we, us, i" which was meant to be like its Ukraine and zelensky talking. He was quoting the other side. I got confused few times also, cos when the translator said " I, we" it didn't make sence that he was talking about Russia, because he was talking about Ukraine a the time.
Thank you will keep that in mind when watching the full interview.
You are right he didn’t get it right.
It’s a form of speech in Russian, nothing more. Don’t overthink it
NAZILENSKY 🤡🐷💩💀☠🇺🇦
I noticed quite a bit of mistakes. But why did Mr. Carlson choose to have a live translator talking over president Putin - when he could've used subtitles, as he usually does in interviews with other people who don't talk to him in English? I think it's a fair question which requires an answer, especially since the interview wasn't airing live.
Thank you. Great synopsis and breakdown.
I’m 71 and what I’m seeing in this interview is that in my entire lifetime the U.S. has not had a President nearly as smart as Putin. In fact, he’s not only very common sense minded but he’s also absolutely brilliant! Sadly, we don’t have that. I don’t think we ever have. Maybe 100 plus years ago ... maybe.
READ MY COMMENT AND REPLY IF YOU AGREE WE HAVE TO DO THIS TOGETHER
This is very funny. What can you even know about Putin living in the USA? You only know what is shown on TV. You will never see how pensioners in Russia rummage through garbage cans in search of expired food. How their pension is not enough to live for a month. You are very funny when you say that you want a leader like Putin. Move to Russia for one year and live there under Putin. I would look into it
That's why you are 71.
Brain-dead
That was an impressive summery. You covered a lot but missed a couple important points. The leaders of Germany and France admitted that they negotiated the Minsk accords in bad faith. They admitted right on youtuibe that they negotiated a deal they never intended to implement. The blame the failure of that peace accord negotiated 6 or 7 years ago on Putin is therefor wrong. Also Putin brought up several times the Ukraine passed a law making it illegal to negotiate with Russia. How is Russia supposed to negotiate with a country that will not negotiate back ?
Полностью согласен
I assume Ukraine has read Putin's "Historical Russia" speech about a Soviet Reunion. It would explain a lot.
When the cold war ended, they could've not expanded NATO and just kept some semblance of it for security but no. We had to get cute.
@@loufrost824Reason why Switzerland only join Schengen for economics but neither EU nor NATO. Best democracy in my opinion. They understand too well in power politicis there's no good guys 😅
Молодец. В точку. Правильно поняли ... 👍👍👍👍🇷🇺
Respect to Tucker for doing this interview, the media should learn a lesson from this.
Neo nazist Putin is a lier and facts and history twister. And Carlson is a lier and conspiracy theories spreader. They deserve each other
Nobody cares what Putin has to say. He's a coward just like tucker..
A lesson in what exactly? Polishing a fascist dictator’s knob for clout?
Lol go back to destiny lil virg
the mainstream meadia learn everything from their jewish owners' instructions.
Tucker has the same demented laugh as Ron DeSantis-a cross between Pac-Man and Pennywise the clown.
your very very important line...acutally made me sub, that was well done !
The interview can be summarizer with one question that was in it. "Mr President, who really runs America?" 😂
The Russians apparently
and a simple answer, but a factual one - NOT the president but the 3 letter agencies. Vivek is 100% correct.
The Swamp.
The Jews
I swear people lack critical thinking skills. Putin views us as his adversaries. Why would you belive a single thing he says?
It was refreshing to hear a head of state who knows history, and can converse logically and can actually speak in complete sentences.
And who cleverly covered his actual plans. Read Putin's "Historical Russia" speech about a Soviet Reunion. Russia has provided English Translations.
The guys a politician and dictator. They won’t interview him to look bad because he’d just kill the guy. The amount of people being fooled by this evil man is crazyyy.
@mattttty1999 the amount of people that believe Biden is competent and not weak and embarrassing is waaay crazy.
His blatant lies about the history of Ukraine are intolerable.
And? How does that make him not a rapist and not a murderer? I remember Dr Lecter also sweet-talking logically and in complete sentences. Did it provide an extra releif to his victims?
Wow Kevin you hit it out of the park here. Great summary and basically my thoughts after watching the full interview myself.
Man i just discovered you and im glad i did, thank you SO MUCH from Canada for bringing such an unbiased breakdown of this mess.
Came to learn how to flip homes, stayed for geopolitical analysis.
Russia wanted to implement the Minsk accords.The Minsk agreement was signed by Russian, Ukraine, Germany and France in 2014 & 2015. Last year, the ex-German Chancellor Angela Merkel, said in an interview the "Minsk agreement served to buy time to rearm Ukraine." They never intended to honour the Minsk agreement.
Evidently Putin told Ukraine what is coming. Read Putin's "Historical Russia" speech about a Soviet Reunion. Russia has provided English Translations.
so basically putin is right , nato used ukraine as sacrifical lamb to make russia weak
@@msimon6808 imagine a Cuban middle crises on Russian border. Oh wait! It is happening. 🤦♂️ Both sides can be right. Then why didn't Ukraine stay neutral instead of seeking NATO membership. This happened in 2014 not just 2 years ago.
@@MyLife-og2kr "a Cuban middle crises"? What is this? Do you mean missile crisis
Russia never intended to abide by it either... Russia has violated the Minsk Accords over and over again, baiting the Ukrainians to break it as well. People like you are nothing more than tools used to undermine your own freedom and democracy...
The globalists wanted to make a fool out of Russia. But instead, the globalists ended up making fools of themselves. Let that be a lesson!
I can assure you they haven't learned their lesson...
Putin is fielding T-55s. He’s really showing how foolish the West is 😂😂😂
@@StrawHat83t 55s doing it's job unfortunately
@@ShabbatShalom-hi5ln You mean getting destroyed during human meat wave attacks? I agree.
What..?
Your interpretation at the 20:50 mark leads to a major misunderstanding. You missed a crucial moment in Putin's speech, where he talked about stopping arms supplies and ending the war. He added that negotiations can begin before the US stops supplying arms.
Btw I watched russian version as I am native speaker.
Adolf Hitler, too, would like the Americans not to give weapons to anyone.
@@Master.09614 Холоп, ты то куда...
@@Master.09614 NATO armed the rebels in Libya. The rebels then took over Libya after they killed Gaddafi. Libya is now filled with armed rebel thugs and criminals getting away with all the crimes you can think of. All thanks to the US and NATO giving the rebels hundreds of thousands of weapons. Look at the state of Libya before and after the death of Gaddafi.
No we didn’t miss that part. Russia just want to take Ukraine weapons.
@@Master.09614 Well , Americans did gave lots of weapons , oil, gas , and technology to nazi Germany. Transport trucks beside MAN manufacturer was Ford , not only simple trucks , but many other things. You can easily say that US was main financier of nazi Germany, along side with UK.
Знаете, что меня расстраивает, как россиянина в комментариях иностранцев, в особенности американцев? Нет, не то что кто-то не поддерживает позицию моей страны и даже не оскорбления и пр. Меня расстраивает, что комментаторы всех обзывают коммунистами. Всех - это значит всех. Правительство США, правительство России, даже правительство Канады обвиняют в коммунизме😅 так и хочется узнать, а вы вообще знаете что такое коммунизм? Вы знаете, что в России с 1991 года коммунизм представляет малочисленная партия, которая почти не представлена в правительстве? Что, если вы выйдете на улицу и спросите людей коммунисты ли они, люди вам в основном ответят, что они капиталисты. Вы найдете коммунистов среди пары дедушек и бабушек, которые с 1991 года хранят свой просроченный партийный билет. Россия не коммунистическая страна, даже мне пришлось сейчас обратиться к энциклопедии, чтобы проверить точно ли я знаю что такое коммунизм. А ведь я преподаватель истории России. Коммунизм это не то, что рассказывали вам ваши родители или СМИ, и это точно не обзывательство. Возможно, коммунизм - это обвинение. Но прежде чем обвинить человека в том, что он, например, "фарисей", может в начале узнать что такое "фарисей" и подходит ли он под кретерии, чтобы потом не выглядеть дураком??
👏👏👏👏
Любишь своего фюрера, руzzкий?
shut up communist😂
Communism is just media propaganda for the US to sanction other countries.
В точку!
The way Putin gives a potted history on the birth of Ukraine)Rus) was riveting, he added layer after layer as only a Russian can. That may bore the pants off the 3 second attention spanning West but for me it was inportant as someone who studied history at Uni. He was candid in his discourse in relating how he sees the West and the vsrious US administrations, no name calling but magnanimous in his share of the responsibility but fair in the political spectrum as he saw it, Nato expansion, Nordstream, Ukraine (whom he humbly calls family) all of it and more and Tucker did a great job, listened, studied and understood.
Putin has plans. He gives speeches. Read Putin's "Historical Russia" speech about a Soviet Reunion. Russia has provided English Translations.
What does the Ukraine have to do with Rus?
It was his polite and delicate way of saying "Ukraine is a fake constructed by bolsheviks and we are not obliged to respect this fake any more".
Did Putin mention that prior to Catherine the great "Russia" was often a name given to the area west of lviv? Or that the European part of today's Russia was simply referred to as Moscovy?
@@justmejustme4444 "Moscovy" is a European term, most likely it was a pejorative nickname designed to downplay its meaning
Did Tucker just find a road to peace that no one else wanted to?
Just came to say that I really REALLY appreciate the daily wealth emails I receive from you. Thank you Kevin.
RFK informed us months ago of everything Putin covered in this interview with Tucker tonight.
RFK24!!!!!!!
True but he doesn’t tell the truth about the Palestinians
@@jcostanzo7048 Yasser Arafat and the KGB?
@@jcostanzo7048 You said 'true'. But all you care about is 'Palestinians'? What about the truths that you said first? They don't count? Just your 'palestinian' crap? And no, I do not support either faction in that fight.
Putin's been spinning this stuff for years now, pay attention
If past translations are accurate, Putin is a skilled orator and politician. It's hard to know who or what to believe these days, but hearing all sides can't hurt.
Agreed! Silencing people to protect democracy is purely hypothetical and goes against the very principles of democracy.
This is the man that murders his political opponents and changed the Russian constitution so he can stay in power as long as possible. Lets not forget how Russians are imprisoned for having an opinion. And now he thinks he can hoodwink us all into believing he's so innocent. Absolute BS.
@@viggolinde4567democracy is moronic. Everyone having equal votes is actual insanity.
well, when you come to see the fact that the mainstream media have an agenda and they arelying to us to get us into wars, you will see Putin is not the bad guy, the "see eye aaa" is the real bad guy
I am conservatively skeptical about anything Putin says as well, but it is so rare to hear him speak on international relations and the Russian position on global issues that you can’t help but be riveted.
I'm glad i watched the whole interview. So i can compare against fake news
You Are Great!!! Thx!!
And You Are nice to Look at
2 things.
1, russia was not a signing party of the minsk accords, there was nothing for them to implement, but they were going to intermediate that process. And Angela Merkel came out and publicly stated that the minsk accords were just a means to buy ukraine time to boost its military.
2nd, putin did not contradict himself. He basically said that there is nothing to negociate with the us and all they had to do if they wanted an end to the war was to stop shipping weapons. He did however say that he's willing to negotiate with ukraine and went further by telling us that he already did that once and they had reached a deal but ukraine backed out last minute with half of the agreement already signed
100%
Yes, correct.........
100%. Two big pieces Kevin got wrong. And those are facts backed by leaders from other countries who are not friendly with Russia
Exactly, Boris Johnson was the interlocutor of US to break the deal
Half of the agreement😂😂😂😂😂
It’s right on point. People need to hear this. Thank you.
I recently moved to Crimea. So far, I have not met a single person who would like to return to the power of Ukraine. Even considering that since 2014, due to the imposed sanctions, many technologies are not available here, unlike the rest of Russia. In addition, many people fled here from Donbass, and these people will never want to return to the government of Ukraine, they hate the government of Ukraine, considering them traitors to their own people.
You can talk about the annexation of Crimea as much as you want, but as soon as you arrive and talk to any local resident, you will understand how happy they are to return to Russia.
It really sucks when criticisms from the leader of one of your country's biggest rivals aligns frighteningly close with your own. hard time for patriots.😞
EDIT: Sheesh! some people seem to think a guy is pro-Russia because he admits that Putin's has some valid criticisms, talk about seeing things in terms of black and white.
America is dying just like any country in history I don’t know why people are surprised.
If Hitler had simply stopped at Austria called it the Greater German Reich and that was that. He would be considered one better leaders throughout history. Like Teddy Roosevelt simultaneously bringing together Progressive and Conservative ideals in a coherent manner. Putin is really smart. He knows exactly what to say. But I can criticise the USA having 200k Contractors in Iraq AND Russia Invading Ukraine. This isn't simply an either or here. The New American Tech Neo-Feudalism is a problem and if Russia actually was some beacon of freedom I'd gladly back them. But they aren't. Putin is KGB and that is who runs Russia. Imagine if CIA straight up ran the USA. Often they are very close to Top Executive Orders and most of us agree that the Coups in Latin America and Iran some of our worst decisions ever. JFK said he would disperse the CIA to the winds.
@Joe-no7gs
Joe burger, you ain't black!
News is the same reason u think of Russia as rivals. Why are they actually rivals? Putin is friendly and Russians are great but people bully him and is he not supposed to stand up for himself
what a traitor you all sound like. In the 50's your party would have put you in jail
10:25
No the greatest nazification is not ukraine applauding nazi war hero.
It is the growth of the Bandera movement. Banerites were nationalist militia who got integrated into the ukranian military and government.
And there are statues of Bandera (the same guy whose group went into poland and killed 100 000 women and children in the villages while most of the men were fighting in ww2)
Every year they celebrate this mans life even though he was also part of the Nazi movement under Hitler.
Putin said that the applause of the Nazi war hero was one of the confirmations of the Nazi glorification but the Bandera movement growth is much worse.
The funny part of it is that they, in Ukraine, say that Stephan Bandera was Jew.
It's nationalism not nazis. Because it's about creating a nation for Ukrainians.
@@Xerathielno, it's about killing another people by ukrs
The "nazification" has always been a BS excuse. There are valid reasons, this ain't one of them
@@rb847It is bullshit . He was killing them
Brilliant work! Thank u! ❤
Very good points, as for me.
Thank you from UA!
By saying "stop sending them weapon and we will negotiate" he meant that if you stop sending them weapon, it will force ukraine to find solution and will lead them to negotiations instead of fighting till the last soldier and refusing from any negotiations. Was that so hard to understand?
If you know anything about how Russia or Putin operates you would absolutely know that is not at all what Putin meant. Stop with the wishful and often naive thinking...
You realize that when Putin said he attempted to "Negotiate" with Ukraine he proposed None-Starters like you give up all you coastal city's, you can no longer have a standing army, Russia gets to dictate all trade in Ukraine.
What exactly is there to negotiate? You can have all my coastal city's and take my army but I get to trade with whoever I want..........LOL
@@antoinedemm7533so you tell me what he meant since you’re such a genius on Russia and Putin
I don't understand how that would be the answer. Would forcing Ukraine to the negotiating table really "stop" the war? Whose to say Russia wouldn't just restart it again in like 10 years, once they are restocked and rearmed? I mean, that's literally what happened between Crimea in 2014 and the invasion in 2022. There's precedent for this too, as when the Allies decided to give away the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia to Nazi Germany in 1938 as to avoid war, Germany just took over the whole country anyway, and moved on to Poland the next year. And besides, if your country was invaded, would you ever want to go to the negotiating table of those whose first stipulation for peace was to annex part of your home?
@@benjaminmaldonado7652 Russia making it a stipulation that Ukraine should secede some of its territory to Russia in exchange for "peace," should be all the information you need when Putin says he wants to "negotiate."
* Regarding Russian troops leaving Kyiv. Did Putin withdraw them or did Ukraine kick them out? They left on 29th March due to the agreement that was going to go ahead. On 9th April the press get their knickers in a twist when Boris takes an unexpected trip to Ukraine. He was sent by Biden/NATO to stop the agreement. Ukraine did as told
Russia withdrew the troops as a free will act after the Istambul negociations to show the dedication to go forward with the peace agreement. There was no kicking out and fighting.
@@dmitrycherepov3242 Russia withdrew their troops because they were being shredded and ambushed everywhere! Let me guess you think Kherson and Kharkiv collapse was good will also?
@@homeguardster ey its better than let the men suffered heavy losses in bakhmut and lost the city
@@homeguardster it is well known that first in the vanguard SWAT armed only with batons and shields marched to Kiev - do you think they were going to capture the capital with such "weapons"? The beginning of the war was not the same as in Iraq - there were no strikes on infrastructure, bridges and power plants. Putin was bluffing. And the bluff was a mistake - the ukrainian government was not afraid. Then Zelensky made a mistake - he believed that he could defeat Russia. The real war began in the fall of 2022. "The whole plan of the big counteroffensive 2023 was based on simple things: a russians sees a Bradley, a Leopard-and runs away. That of course didn’t happen. " - is a quote from Forbes, you can find it. The russians did not run. It's 2024, and ukrainian troops are leaving Bakhmut, Mariinka, and Avdiivka. Chasov Yar and Kupyansk are next in line. And US politicians have been blocking aid for two months now. The end is near.
@@homeguardster Let's assume this is true.
More precisely, an action can have several subtexts. Yes, there was high resistance, but there were also negotiations.
Those. Ukraine perceived Russia’s temporary weakness as permanent, and instead of negotiations, it stopped them, thinking that it would gain more from it.
And what is the result?
👍A much needed full interview for the world 🌏to hear🇷🇺🤝🇺🇸
Your comment is intended for those who do not want to watch the interview! I RECOMMEND EVERYONE TO WATCH THE FULL VERSION
I watched all two hours and seventeen minutes. Now I’m reading articles and obviously watching content. Great video.
Not normally the biggest Tucker guy. But this could be the most important interview of the 21st century.
With no off ramp for this war, this interview maybe THE mile marker to a potential off ramp.
I agree with your comment.
Regarding off-ramps, there was one a while back with Boris Johnson, but he was coerced into ditching it. Why? Because of the US war machine and greedy politicians getting rich off it.
The actual off ramp is a Soviet Reunion. Read Putin's "Historical Russia" speech about a Soviet Reunion.
I think this was the most important piece of media in the last 20 years. It's important that we get to hear the other side of the situation.
@@msimon6808 are you seriously gonna copy and paste this same reply in all the top comments? Working so hard.
@@wolfswinkel8906 You would be surprised at how many haven't read the speech. Republicans especially. I'm a Republican. I have yet to have a commenter refute "it is a plan for a Soviet Reunion". Can you?
Hi Kevin! I liked your summary, it was sharp and on point for the most part! But since I speak Russian and listened to Putin’s answers in Russian, I would like to put my 2 cents in if you don’t mind. It’s about “the most important point” that you brought up a few times - how Putin says that if US stops to supply weapons, the war will end in 2 weeks and then he will be ready to negotiate. It’s not exactly how he actually said it! Maybe it was taken out of context or it has something to do with the translation, but the way he said it in Russian didn’t really have such implication/meaning like you explained. It was more like Russia is ready for peace talks and has been ready since 18 months ago. The solution to end this war is simple - US just needs to stop supplying weapons and it will end the war in 2 weeks and that he is ready to have peace talks to make this happen.. I hope it helps 🙌🏻
Yeah, they didn't translate every word, I've noticed it too. Some were crucial waords to translate. May be they re translate this interview better later.
As a Russian and English speaker myself with a degree in English, I noticed on many occasions that the translation was weak and didn’t properly convey what Putin was saying. However, Putin’s speeches are complicated and he uses a lot of phrases that are hard to interpret for many. You really need to be good at what you do to interpret him. There have been many occasions when he himself corrected the interpreters for misinterpretation during his interviews.
@@rb847 Exactly right! 🙌🏻 There were a few more inaccuracies in Kevin’s summary. But I feel like it’s not his fault, he based his summary on a translated version of this interview and Russian language is too complicated to translate when it comes to nuances and figures of speech. Nevertheless I still think Kevin did an amazing overview and I really liked and appreciated his bias-free style
@@marinakyousefian So true Marina! 🙌🏻 that’s how media twists a lot of statements and lots of people easily believe what they read, watch, hear without any critical thinking. And that is why I made my comment just in case if someone has a curious and opened enough mind to get the full picture.
Ironically, these "mistakes" made by the interpreters aligns much more closely with Putin's actions as well as other speeches and interivews, where he clearly states that the "Special Military Operation" will not stop until Russia achieves all of their objectives, than what you are suggesting was an act of "loss in translation". But yes, you are correct, Putin did tone down his usual rhetoric for the "western audience".
Appreciate this, didn't come across as biased , just what I wanted to know but much faster, thankyou.
great job, I saw the whole interview in russian and you preety much nailed it!!!
It was a fabulous interview. Putin never fails to deliver. Better than 90% of our politicians.
Go to bed Ivan
shut it@@pinkfloyd870
@@pinkfloyd870 Pink Floyd actually roots for Ivans, not na ts is!
@pinkfloyd870 I mean he has got a point, I don't agree with a lot of what putin said but you can't deny he is articulate and better politically than most western politicians
@@pinkfloyd870what a pathetic child
Thanks Kev!
How am I just discovering this channel? Thanks. That cleared up some of the things I struggled to follow.
."..What made it worse though is not just that that person spoke in the Canadian Parliament, which is now being referred to as a 'big scandal', but what made it worse was the perception - and this did actually happen! - that everybody gave that individual a two-time standing ovation." So which was it ? A mere perception or a fact that actually happened? Cause calling something that was public on tv for the world to see simultaneously fact and perception looks an awful lot like trying to relativize and minimize the case even a little bit. Hundreds of Canadian high-rank officials applauding a fazi for fighting against the Russians in ww2 (i.e. with Hitler!) is a severe indictment on the Canadian education system.
cherry on top: speaker of the house was forced to resign, because trudeau said he is repsonsible and his office (trudeau's) had no idea about the nazi.
Guess what leaked a couple of days ago? an official email from the office of trudeau inviting the nazi to parlament. absolute clown show
alright please provide some context to what he actually said. instead of just hating on a guy working for the nazis i want to see if he told the jews to suck an egg or actually said " i dont like hitler actually "
I don't think he spoke. The speaker drew attention to him in the gallery and led the House and visitors in applauding him for his contribution as "a great Ukrainian" and "a great Canadian". The speaker took responsibility and resigned his appointment. Now it seems a higher ranking official should possibly have been held to account.
@@chozer1he doesn’t need to say anything. The fact he made it this far in life without being executed for war crimes is simply because he flew under the radar until now.
It's both. He says the perception is bad because no, Canada does not inherently support the ideals of Nazism. It was an opponent and fought Nazism. Yet the fact is, a Nazi was applauded in Parliament. The perception to the world is thus, Canada has now begun propegating this ideology. This is worse than a singular man being applauded by buffoons. This gives those who do believe in such an ideology, the perception that Canada is the place to go to congregate.
Remember when Putin said he would never invade Ukraine and then two days later he invaded Ukraine? I member
Don't watch this summery. Watch the whole interview in order to understand it
Thanks.
Awesome summary! Very informative! 🙏
If you see Crimea as Ukraine then you see Kosovo as Serbia. But US recognizes Kosovo as an independent country, but don’t allow Crimea the same right, go figure; the hypocrisy is appalling.
As a matter of fact, Serbia has a bigger claim on Kosovo than Ukraine on Crimea, but that’s a whole other convo.
Путин об этом часто говорил в своих выступлениях. США просто игнорируют эти слова.
In principle, Ukraine has no rights to Crimea, because these are donated territories without the participation of the population itself.
Ne seri više bogati o kosovu, imate lo sta pametnije da radite osim sto politiku ganjate.
@zaazzaaaz1704 then take Alaska,
Kosovo is supported by USA only because of the Serbian oppression and genocide that happened to Albanians, in the other hand Crimea didn’t have the same problems.
At least the truth is coming out. A lot of people havent looked into any of the backstory. NATO has not been considerate about their expansion and the military industrial complex is very unhealthy for world relationships. I for one am sick of paying taxes to fund foreign wars. The people in our own country need our help.
And what about Russia's expansion? Russia has been starting wars and expanding since the collapse of the Soviet Union before NATO began its "expansion"... where's your justification for that? Perhaps if Russia wasn't so hellbent on expansion itself post Soviet countries wouldn't find a need to run to NATO in order to protect itself from what we witnessed in Chechnya, Moldova, Georgia, and Ukraine... Stop eating up Russian propaganda, do a bit of actual research.
Most of the nation and your wealth comes from business (and war) abroad.and fully agree that current system should focus more on those in need as the gap between rich and poor is becoming worse.
Hahaha you’re so dumb
🤣
That has been Putin's narrative the entire time this is nothing new.
"Individual Allies cannot make agreements on NATO’s behalf. President Clinton consistently refused Boris Yeltsin's offer to commit that no former Soviet Republics would join NATO: "I can't make commitments on behalf of NATO, and I'm not going to be in the position myself of vetoing NATO expansion with respect to any country, much less letting you or anyone else do so… NATO operates by consensus," he said."
We never promised anything to Russia. Their aggression is of their own Accord. NATO Allies have ZERO OBLIGATION to join any War that is not Defensive. The USA does not CHOOSE NATO members. It is their own Choice. And then Consensus among member states.
Russian president Boris Yeltsin signed a declaration in which he stated that Poland joining NATO is not contrary to Russia's interests. Polish officials literally got Yeltsin hammered and got him to sign this EFFECTIVELY trying to Blackmail their way into NATO. Why do states desperately want to Join NATO? The Baltics, Scandinavia, Poland etc...
Given that Poland was invaded by Russia in WWII. I would listen to what they have to say about Russia. Being their Neighbor and all. Guess what its not good at all. They ramping up their Military more then any country in Europe. Why would they do that if Russia had peaceful intentions? If this was all about NATO and the USA? Cause it isn't.
Okay, I subscribed!
i think he missed some parts where putin says he was trying to make negotitations but was refused
this guys is a plant, this is not a summary. It is scripted propaganda
Ofcourse he will always pretend to be innocent XD meanwhile he is murdering Ukrainians and his own people for what to be exact? his own safety?. He was the one invading Ukraine and taking more and more from Ukraine. Russia already started taking in land in 1999 the Chechen war and 2008 Georgia was being attacked. You can not negotiate with someone that just wants to take more and more for himself. A country does not wants to lose its land. How would you feel if your neighboring country came in with violence to just take land and you have no choice to accept otherwise. That is oppression. The Ukrainians did not want closer ties with Russia as the massive protest in 2014. The people chose and Poetin disliked that. Aside from that those Russians shut our airplane with 200 civilians out of the air. threatened us and did not fill up our gass and oil to 100% even though we did pay for it to control us. We don't look at it from an American point of view but an European point of view that live closer to Russia. Ukraine is oppressed by Russia. Russia wanted to power in Ukraine politically and it failed because of the people. He does not learn that his way of looking at things if that of an authoritarian leader that does not want to give freedom to the people. He decides whatever needs to be done and nobody else has anything to say. Ukraine is not allowed to become member of anything because Russia does not want it and otherwise they will just destroy you. That is not normal, you are blind if you don't see that. If Poetin really wants peace then he wouldn't have started that war in the first place. He just wants more power to be at least as powerful as the US. There is no need for his paranoia to feel that he needs more land to protect himself while America could just dump an atomic bomb on any of these places. He is afraid of his own people and losing his own power.
I wouldn't believe everything Putin says though. He lies all the time.
Так это самое главное! Привет из Новосибирска!
nice we got an anime avatar on the case fellas this whole war should be over soon
I hope your child is doing well Kevin, ive been praying for God to take care of your sick child since your video came out
Thanks! Where can we find the original video of their interview?
Tucker Carlson You Tube channel
About the Minsk Accords, Putin said "We were ready to implement it" not because Russia backed out or anything, but because everyobe else refused to fulfill their side of the bargain FOR YEARS, and Russia responded accordingly. Merkel herself admitted publicly that Germany never intended to fulfill their side of the agreement and that the Minsk Accords were only ment to freeze the conflict and buy time for Ukraine and their foreign supporters.
You can think of the Minsk Accords as any other contract, except that there is no higher authority to enforce said contract or to compensate the wronged party if they get taken advantage of (because it's a deal between countries), so it's up to both sides to come up with a solution for how to fulfill said contract. Except, when one side never intended to fulfill their obligations in the first place the only way the contract can be fulfilled is if the other side gives up.
As for "negotiations", please do consider that Russia sat down to negotiate multiple times since the reignition of the armed conflict, and every single time was just a stab in their back both from Ukraine and it's allies, so at this point Putin's stance is that negotiating with Ukraine, which is a US and NATO pupper, is meaningless unless the weapon shipments stop and the current government of Ukraine is demolished. If you don't believe me, go look up what Russia's stance on negotiations was a year ago and two years ago.
Putin was shown to be very patient with the West.
Он всегда таким был. Мы, россияне, иногда даже злимся из-за этой терпимости к мерзкому отношению Запада.
I think it was the interview, that was only possible in todays age.
@@DocCodyplease don't think that all of us are like that. Unfortunately we have some really big problems within the government and they are acting in place of their own agendas and not what most of us think that is best for, not only us but the whole world.
What exactly shows his patience? Russia was in a state of disarray after the Soviets collapsed and didn’t he didn’t have to the capabilities to act on his ultimate goal of restoring the Russian Empire. Once he was strong enough he acted on his plans.
kevin miss the point putin say about negotiation, he clearly not watching when istanbul negotiation take place, russia troops pull out from kiev in honor for peace negotiation, but it was actually using by the west to supply more weapons to ukraine, and the killing in donbas and other region did not stop , from this poin on russia cannot give soft talking anymore
America needs a strong patriotic leader.. Not that thing we have now
There is absolutely no way that Biden is the leader of the US. Sure, the "Biden administration" is leading the US, but Biden has nothing to do with it. Putin knows that too.
What? Biden is patriotic and trying to help Ukraine. Trump would probably give in to his buddy Putin and eventually we would all end up being under the rule of Russia.
@@JavaZombie Trump in prison 2024
@@larryharder4285they should all be in prison. We need a strong patriotic leader. I am sick of this lessor of two evils crap.
Trump ,even in prison, would be better than what USA have now !!@@larryharder4285
Subscribed
Great reporting 👍👍👍👍
Anyone notice he actually knows and talks in details, unlike the superficial and rehearsed (or told by an in ear) way of talking of our politicians on this side of the pond.
That's all I'll say. And that's plenty.
you are low IQ if you fell for that.. LUL
He is delusional and everything that he told about Ukrainian history is fake. And he knows it only because he “imagined” it all. I’m Ukrainian and Putin refuses to me to be Ukrainian. He is true Nazi
probably because Americans age terribly hahaha.
Umm, Hitler was an incredible public speaker, hence why he was so popular. It’s usually the great charismatic leaders who lie and manipulate the most
He does talk in detail, which is probably how he's learned to talk to Russians who tend to respect education and learning. Whether his facts are correct, and whether the conclusions he derives from those facts are also correct, is quite another matter. His fanciful descriptions of Russian history, for example, have been widely criticized by historical researchers as false - he simply distorts facts or makes them up to suit his narrative and agenda.
Everything points to the United States as being the guilty party.
Yeah... sure. The U.S. is to blame for Russia deciding to go in and murder people to take their land.
@@Joe-no7gsWhat a clever McDonald’s brain. Did you think of that one all by yourself?
Duh!
You’ve got to be regarded 😂
United States may be guilty but Russia is even more so. There are no innocent men on the path to power
Good job on summary!
It's been scary to me to see how the current political environment in the US has made this another partisan right vs. left issue. I said the same thing about covid, and this is another example. This has been an issue where the country has always been united, and rightfully so. Yet, it's crazy to me to see how many Americans I see in these YT comments who are applauding Tucker's interview and being sympathetic and even supportive of Putin
I feel the same way. It’s really insane.
WHY IS IT SO HARD TO FIND THE FULL INTERVIEW WHERE CAN YOU WATCH IT?????????? I WANT TO MAKE MY OWN OPINION ON IT! I found it on Twitter in the end on Carlson Tuckers account 120 million views 🤯
ruclips.net/video/fOCWBhuDdDo/видео.htmlfeature=shared
Because it goes again the "freedom of information" principle.
Type on youtube. 'Tucker, full interview with Putin. ' as simple as that. Read below the time. If it says 2 hours 17 minutes. That's the full interview. Hope this helps.
Already well over 5 million views after 14 hours since the interview.
@@canman5060 Huh? The originals at 110m on x
Meet Kevin
You have also contributed immensely to this history, milestone of an interview.
Congratulations
@@Joe-no7gs and you are a half-wit
Seriously what is happening right now
As a libertine conservative im increasingly impressed with non bias way u carry ur content im sure it wins u no favors in alot of cases but its so honest i enjoy it
It's not unbiased. Putin told many lies and there is no fact-check at all. This video was basically a way to spread russian propaganda. It's the total opposite of being unbiased
Excellent summary! thank you!
You are wrong on Minsk agreement. It was a multy stage plan. And the first stage had to be done by Ukraine. Go reaad it. Its not big reading. And Zelensky did publicly denounced it many times.
Он работает на демократов, что ты от него ожидаешь?
Zelensky is just a puppet
@@ektran4205 This is true. But ALL politicians are puppets for those who are pulling the strings from behind.
BS
В минских соглашениях было написано, что Украина должна провести выборы на Донбассе, но как Украина могла это сделать на оккупированных РФ территориях?
I am a Mongolian here and watching almost every single video of you kevin for years since your subs were 80k, this is the first time you mentioned mongol in your channel.
LOL
I’m sorry it was in reference to “mongol hordes” 🤦😳
News report:
RUclipsr MeetKevin Hates Mongols.
@@TheSarcasticEngineer
Update:
Pro Russian RUclipsr MeetKevin hates mongols
Only Vladimir Putin knows why Ukraine
one megalomaniac accuses the opposing megalomaniac of being a megalomaniac and the opponent responds with the same accusation. we learned nothing, lol
The soviet (ruzzians) invaded Poland without a formal declaration of war on 17 September 1939 from the east. In November 1939 the Soviet government annexed the entire Polish territory under its control. Some 13.5 million Polish citizens who fell under the military occupation were made Soviet subjects following show elections conducted by the NKVD secret police in an atmosphere of terror,the results of which were used to legitimise the use of force. A Soviet campaign of political murders and other forms of repression, targeting Polish figures of authority such as military officers, police and priests, began with a wave of arrests and summary executions. putler is a liar and 2nd Hitler!! We can stop him by only helping Ukraine❤
Thank you! At least some sane people still exist.
@@user-ut6ol7np9u Its all ruzzian bots here, they put millions in propaganda around The world but they gonna loose this war and all who helped gonna go to prison like nazzis !
How could you blame Putin for saying he'll negotiate after they stop fighting when the "Zelensky peace plan" calls for Russia to totally give up and leave before Ukraine will negotiate. Then Russia would have no negotiation leverage
Putin had to go to war to get the negotiating leverage he needed to stop the war. Putin's "Historical Russia" speech about a Soviet Reunion is a better explanation.
That's why Larov call Zelensky demand are unrealistic and childish.
🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🇷🇺❤️🇺🇸
In addition to Russia's complete surrender and withdrawal from Ukraine, Zelensky also wants the Russian government overthrown and for the country to pay for Ukrainian reconstruction, among other preconditions.
@@JessieIsreal I’m from Russia ☺️
I did subscribe!