The problem is that most of the magnets pull "backwards" as much as forward". You somehow need to switch them off (or better, reverse their poles) when the projectile goes past them. Of course, you can only really do this with electromagnets
I think that's why they did progressively stronger magnets the further down. Yes there is some back tug, but the it starts with momentum, and the stronger magnets give more attraction.
@@videogameplayer0552 plans were drawn out for “Imperium” and we went to buy the capacitors and the electric store heard what we were doing and we’re like “ummm we can’t sell that to you because it’s extremely dangerous” or whatever so our teacher didn’t let us build it. BUT I’m building one in college and no one gonna stop me
You're right. "Rail gun" is made of simple words and the phrase is easily misused as it is here. rail guns, as being developed by several countries require large electric currents to drive large magnetic fields (don't you remember Maxwell's equations?) and doesn't have or need a line of magnets like this does. Even scaled up to the same size as the rail gun the US Navy was developing, this design will never, ever send a projectile at thousands of miles per hour.
Don't get me wrong, this is cool, but I don't think it's a railgun. Some sort of magnetic accelerator, but not what people are talking about when they say "railgun"
Rather the other way around. This is the very definition of a "rail"gun, because it uses "rails" of magnets to propel projectiles. It's just not the sci-fi nonsense that what people like to believe is a "railgun".
@@jagel5632 Every definition says a railgun uses high current and conducting rails to propel the payload electromagnetically at extremely high speeds. Railguns aren't scifi nonsense, they exist.
A railgun follows the principle of the fleming left hand rule . It needs current passing through a conductor to form a magnetic field then only its a railgun.
@@jagel5632 Go look up the Naval Railgun, it's real, it has been in prototyping for years. They've got working prototypes that fire a round without exploding. The only issues they need to solve are durability and power use.
@@jagel5632 Not sure why you think railguns are sci-fi. They've literally existed for over a century at this point. The US Navy developed railguns capable of delivering over 10 megajoules of kinetic energy for almost a decade and a half ago. Railguns are very much real and have a specific definition.
This the reason you need electromagnet for railguns, so you can turn it off as soon as the projectile hits top speed. Just put a trip wire/laser at the point where projectile hits top speed to turn off the magnet so you dont have to worry about timing.
You're thinking of coilguns. This is a gauss gun, and they're both different from railguns. It's pretty commonly confused though. If you want to know the difference, here it is: - A gauss gun (which we see here) uses permanent magnets to accelerate a metal projectile to hit another projectile that either isn't magnetic or is further from the magnetic field (so it holds the momentum) and launch it away. This is essentially a magnetic slingshot/crossbow. - A coilgun uses electromagnetic coils that are turned on and off in sequence (as you described) to accelerate a single metal projectile without it losing speed as it starts moving away from the field. - A railgun creates an electric circuit with two rails and a metal projectile, which creates a magnetic field that pushes the projectile down the rails. Railguns are used in military applications while coilguns aren't, because putting bullet amounts of power through wires creates a lot of heat. Coils only make that worse, but single-piece rails and a metal projectile tend to only be limited by the friction caused by high speeds (the fireballs in the navy railgun videos? Those are from friction, not electricity). However, coilguns do have a real-life application in maglev trains, which operate using electromagnets the way you described.
@@Animus989, not. The main defining feature of a rail gun is the rails as the main traction element in the contour formed by the rails and the bullet. MAGNETS IN THE RAILGAN ARE NOT AT ALL. And what you have is just a magnetic gun.
This is not even close to how a real rail gun works. About the only thing this contraption and a rail gun have in common is a metal "projectile". This legal term for this is a magnetic zip gun.
No, My friend and I, 40 years ago, stuffing plastic 35mm film canisters full of gunpowder and making very large bangs. THAT felt illegal. Hotwiring a full sized D9 Caterpillar dozer and joyriding around a construction site....THAT felt illegal. Growing 400 Cannabis plants and getting caught - that was definitely illegal.
what if: instead of the magnetic ball there was a magnetic piston (with a rubberseal greaed with superlube) inside a plexi-glass "barrel" to push the ball-projectile, which is a tiny amount smaller than the barrel.
It wouldn’t be as effective. Rail guns are able to work because they can continue accelerating the projectile through the whole barrel, rather just the start
What you want to look at are coilguns. This is more like a coilgun than a railgun. A railgun used the magnetic field in the projectile itself, while coilguns are more like this, dragging a metalic projectile. The issue here is that, once the projectile has passed one set of magnet, those magnet slow down/drag back the projectile. With coils, you power them before the projectile gets to them, to pull the projectile, and turn them off so the effect dissipates before it's passed the middle of the field and would be dragged back. You can't turn off magnets.
@@RUclipsAccountName since the sphere used here is a magnet itself, isn't its magnet field involved in the functioning of the railgun? it's not just any metallic sphere getting dragged by the surrounding magnets.
The circle would make it difficult, because the magnets need to be progressively stronger to make it gain momentum. That makes it impossible to make an infinite loop of it.
Horrid idea. Imagine bringing out a table made of metal and it just flings towards the wall- once, one dumbass brought a metal rod into an MRI room and he almost skewered somebody. That proves just how powerful that stuff can get, also, it would be extremely costly and just inefficient. (I'm aware that this comment might be sarcastic)
As far as I'm aware, this is not a railgun; I believe a true railgun applies a strong, rapidly oscillating electrical current across the projectile, taking advantage of Lens's Law to create a powerful magnetic field that constantly accelerates the projectile down the rails. With this permanent-magnet setup, most of the magnetic acceleration is canceled out by magnets continuing to pull backward on the projectile after it passes them.
Sure it doesn’t have the common components of a railgun, but this one has the same principles as one, so I think of this as a more simplified railgun without the coils.
@@DZM0N A railgun doesn't have coils 💀 A railgun has two rails through which current moves in opposite directions, with the projectile connected to the current from both rails. Duh.
Not that it matters, but technically this is a Gauss gun not a rail gun. The rail gun uses entirely current induced magnetism in the slug, the Gauss gun uses a magnetic slug.
Why do you rely on impact as the method of energy transference rather than starting both the steel ball and lead projectile together at the beginning of the rail and allowing the steel ball to push the lead projectile?
i'm curious, how this setup did not violate the energy conservation principle? The mass get speed, but since is not a electomagnet, you dont need power to make it work. Did the magnets become weaker somehow with time?
What if instead of the Aluminum ball you use another magnet ball with the same weight, that the first one with momentum shoot that into a tube that directs it back to the begging ? does the sequence repeat ? Don't use stronger magnets at the end.
A quick improvement you could make for these videos is to paint some distances on the back wall(or use a piece of foam board), like 1 foot or whatnot so we could do acceleration math. Just a few lines that're a set distance apart can help us get some more numbers for how fast things are going.
I have a question if a one is nice enough to answer for me. I just woke up thinking of a propulsion system created from magnets. If one could push another. But instead of pushing from one end to another, Why not have it following a set path. For example a main road going straight. We use only the north side on the bottom of our test vehicle, and have our road constructed with a south field facing towards the north. Would the vehicle be able to bounce off that magnetic field and travel down the track? Would rails need to be set to the side to control the movement so the vehicle doesn't go off the tracks? How could this concept be applied if possible at all? Thank you
For that money from magnets, you can buy at least 29 toys or slingshots that throw out steel balls 50 times better and stronger, that game with magnets is meaningless !!! Very expensive way to play !!!
Excuse me I hope you answer but idk if you’ll see my comment but why is ball bearing stopping or rolling back to middle and not continue off other side??
She uses electric current to generate a strong magnetic field to eject the metalic coin. Her power its based on a physic concept that created electromagnets.
You should take the small ball and try firing from the starting positions of your mag ball will hav more force im going to make a magnetinc bolt action gun
Чувак собирал конструкцию думаю часов 5, чтобы сделать видео на 3 минуты? Серьезно? Мамич бы сделал 30 минут видео, да еще и 2 части. Берите пример.)))
Even assuming that the magnets don’t ever lose their magnetization, or are periodically replaced assuming an infinite supply of magnets, we would still eventually lose energy due to friction on the track. Even assuming perfect materials, since there’s no way to capture said energy in a loop the whole point would be lost
Would it work better to have both the accelerator and projectile start at the back snd go together? How much energy is being lost in the impact? How much would be lost with the drag from the projectile? I'm curious to know
if you ever have any leftover magnets I'd sure as heck love them. I'll even pay for shipping. 636 pine ridge place 27609 raleigh NC. The love of my life says I can't buy any more. I own 1.
Tip for future projects, laying them in place that way will eventually break them. Need to be more careful and maybe use a plastic or wooden wedge to place them
Sure I think at free energy. I know it doesn't exist, but it fascinates me nonetheless. What I see there is the ball accelerating and it seems to be no initial push. The guy just puts the ball on the track, and it starts to move and accelerate. Ok, maybe a small push that certainly doesn't account for that acceleration. Now that's gotta be usable somehow.
Every time he takes out powerful magnet and sticks it on the board it feels like Thanos implanting the infinity stones to his gauntlet
Sooo many infinty cristals?
I dient see da movie but thats a lot
Indeed no.
wonder egg priority gang
Well it does put a smile on my face.
@@samthewizzy lesgoo
"Negative, I have the gun. Good luck sir."
- B-312
“There”ll be another time”
Ghosts of Reach.
Another man of culture I see
"Tell 'em to make it count"
The problem is that most of the magnets pull "backwards" as much as forward". You somehow need to switch them off (or better, reverse their poles) when the projectile goes past them. Of course, you can only really do this with electromagnets
Putting the bigger magnets at the front like they did here helps.
You missed the point
I think that's why they did progressively stronger magnets the further down. Yes there is some back tug, but the it starts with momentum, and the stronger magnets give more attraction.
@ When we get super batteries it wont be
@@TexterEX an actual railgun uses capacitors not batteries(at least mostly).
" How did we f**king loose the war ???"
" Sir, the enemies were *Magnetic Games* subscribers "
I'm betting that his audience isn't all that bright, and child soldiers? Sounds morally questionable.
@@KaiserTwo its a joke
The Gauss Gun based on magnetic acceleration is truly one of the best applications of magnetic physics..
Fallout reference?
@@Cris66 didn't understand..
Tanki online reference??
roblox referance?
@@pranaveshjelly7351 I haven't heard that name for many a year..
dear fbi agents,
I swear i didn’t search for this it just popped up in my recommendations please don’t kidnap my pet cat
They are probably looking for your cat, he has committed some serious crimes against humanity
@@ErrorRaffyline0 the cat has committed tax evasion and is being hunted by the IRS
they just shoot pets, no kidnapping
@@booates I thought that was the ATF
Kirby did tax refunds with your cat.
"What did you do at school today Billy?"
"I made a RAIL GUN!"
... Except he didn't. That's a Gauss gun.
I failed cooking class, but I made hokey pokey in science, go figure
Funny enough we’re trying to make a rail gun in my AP physics class tomorrow
@@retromadness3080 how’d it go?
@@videogameplayer0552 plans were drawn out for “Imperium” and we went to buy the capacitors and the electric store heard what we were doing and we’re like “ummm we can’t sell that to you because it’s extremely dangerous” or whatever so our teacher didn’t let us build it. BUT I’m building one in college and no one gonna stop me
This seems more like a passive coil gun.
You're right. "Rail gun" is made of simple words and the phrase is easily misused as it is here. rail guns, as being developed by several countries require large electric currents to drive large magnetic fields (don't you remember Maxwell's equations?) and doesn't have or need a line of magnets like this does. Even scaled up to the same size as the rail gun the US Navy was developing, this design will never, ever send a projectile at thousands of miles per hour.
But the magnetism is the energy for both weapons... rail gun just uses lorenz force so it needs electricity
@Donovan Boston that's a kind of fucked up thing to be advertising mate
@@erikruder3360 It's a bot, who cares.
@@livedandletdie time to build my EMP Cannon, the Bots are stealing our women!!!
It's kinda like the gauss gun..i did the gauss gun experiment in science exhibition and it was really cool 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
You can tell how powerful those magnet were by how cautious he handling them. *scary yet fun to watch*
Lol funny profile
Mythbusters vibe. They had some scary magnets
@@gilligan369 i have one at home, its been stuck to the fireplace for 4 years
Don't get me wrong, this is cool, but I don't think it's a railgun. Some sort of magnetic accelerator, but not what people are talking about when they say "railgun"
Rather the other way around. This is the very definition of a "rail"gun, because it uses "rails" of magnets to propel projectiles. It's just not the sci-fi nonsense that what people like to believe is a "railgun".
@@jagel5632 Every definition says a railgun uses high current and conducting rails to propel the payload electromagnetically at extremely high speeds. Railguns aren't scifi nonsense, they exist.
A railgun follows the principle of the fleming left hand rule . It needs current passing through a conductor to form a magnetic field then only its a railgun.
@@jagel5632 Go look up the Naval Railgun, it's real, it has been in prototyping for years. They've got working prototypes that fire a round without exploding. The only issues they need to solve are durability and power use.
@@jagel5632 Not sure why you think railguns are sci-fi. They've literally existed for over a century at this point. The US Navy developed railguns capable of delivering over 10 megajoules of kinetic energy for almost a decade and a half ago. Railguns are very much real and have a specific definition.
This the reason you need electromagnet for railguns, so you can turn it off as soon as the projectile hits top speed. Just put a trip wire/laser at the point where projectile hits top speed to turn off the magnet so you dont have to worry about timing.
You're thinking of coilguns. This is a gauss gun, and they're both different from railguns. It's pretty commonly confused though. If you want to know the difference, here it is:
- A gauss gun (which we see here) uses permanent magnets to accelerate a metal projectile to hit another projectile that either isn't magnetic or is further from the magnetic field (so it holds the momentum) and launch it away. This is essentially a magnetic slingshot/crossbow.
- A coilgun uses electromagnetic coils that are turned on and off in sequence (as you described) to accelerate a single metal projectile without it losing speed as it starts moving away from the field.
- A railgun creates an electric circuit with two rails and a metal projectile, which creates a magnetic field that pushes the projectile down the rails.
Railguns are used in military applications while coilguns aren't, because putting bullet amounts of power through wires creates a lot of heat. Coils only make that worse, but single-piece rails and a metal projectile tend to only be limited by the friction caused by high speeds (the fireballs in the navy railgun videos? Those are from friction, not electricity). However, coilguns do have a real-life application in maglev trains, which operate using electromagnets the way you described.
@@sethb3090 thanks !
@@sethb3090really interesting comment thank u
No music, no narration, just pure entertainment.
This is NOT a railgun.
Gauss cannon - maybe.
It is a railgun. Just not a electromagnetic railgun.
@@Animus989 it's not using magnetic rails, it's is magnets in sequence. It's basically a passive coilgun, but definitely not a railgun.
@@Animus989, not.
The main defining feature of a rail gun is the rails as the main traction element in the contour formed by the rails and the bullet.
MAGNETS IN THE RAILGAN ARE NOT AT ALL.
And what you have is just a magnetic gun.
Can we just agree it works and would be effective
@@Inlinetodie, nobody argues with this.
The question is in the title.
"In the beginning was the word."
ロマン溢れてやがる…！ 最後に磁石をネット代わりにしてるのも心踊るぜ…！！
1:26=Face reveal!!!!!!😮😮😮😮
?
?
See the damn marble
@@symmetries_ lusture giving a dim image
🔥BUM BAM😎 !!! Magnetic Games
I come from the future, congratulations on the 3 million subscribers
I would like my FBI agent to know that I’m only here out of curiosity
Just find FBI agents' family members. Done.
Make a barrel so the ball hits the back of a needle firing it into a target
Technically this is a Gauss rifle, but still very cool.
Why do almost all these comments sound like bots?
They mostly are made by children and probably bots too
wow ! interesting watching
Umm grammar?
Plllsss plss subscibe to XCDASH
@@randreee1998 I subscribe if you subscribe to me
@@randreee1998 lmao no weeb
nice
This is not even close to how a real rail gun works. About the only thing this contraption and a rail gun have in common is a metal "projectile". This legal term for this is a magnetic zip gun.
something about this feels illegal
No, My friend and I, 40 years ago, stuffing plastic 35mm film canisters full of gunpowder and making very large bangs. THAT felt illegal. Hotwiring a full sized D9 Caterpillar dozer and joyriding around a construction site....THAT felt illegal. Growing 400 Cannabis plants and getting caught - that was definitely illegal.
put your mask back on and go be a good little sheep, pretend you never saw this.
Don't worry. The ATF will make another law against it 😂
Damn just made me have to start an episode of Mandalorian all over again! Thanks!
what if: instead of the magnetic ball there was a magnetic piston (with a rubberseal greaed with superlube) inside a plexi-glass "barrel" to push the ball-projectile, which is a tiny amount smaller than the barrel.
It wouldn’t be as effective. Rail guns are able to work because they can continue accelerating the projectile through the whole barrel, rather just the start
The metal ball is beautiful
What you want to look at are coilguns. This is more like a coilgun than a railgun. A railgun used the magnetic field in the projectile itself, while coilguns are more like this, dragging a metalic projectile.
The issue here is that, once the projectile has passed one set of magnet, those magnet slow down/drag back the projectile.
With coils, you power them before the projectile gets to them, to pull the projectile, and turn them off so the effect dissipates before it's passed the middle of the field and would be dragged back.
You can't turn off magnets.
@@RUclipsAccountName since the sphere used here is a magnet itself, isn't its magnet field involved in the functioning of the railgun?
it's not just any metallic sphere getting dragged by the surrounding magnets.
A railgun fires a strong democracy per shot
Please make it Circle ⭕
The circle would make it difficult, because the magnets need to be progressively stronger to make it gain momentum. That makes it impossible to make an infinite loop of it.
Or if someone is able to make one then it would become like a bullet when you try to stop it
After watching that tower he built. I think we need to start making our buildings out of magnets
Horrid idea. Imagine bringing out a table made of metal and it just flings towards the wall- once, one dumbass brought a metal rod into an MRI room and he almost skewered somebody. That proves just how powerful that stuff can get, also, it would be extremely costly and just inefficient. (I'm aware that this comment might be sarcastic)
Super
Луещяудыжш
أول 👍🏻🌹
As far as I'm aware, this is not a railgun; I believe a true railgun applies a strong, rapidly oscillating electrical current across the projectile, taking advantage of Lens's Law to create a powerful magnetic field that constantly accelerates the projectile down the rails. With this permanent-magnet setup, most of the magnetic acceleration is canceled out by magnets continuing to pull backward on the projectile after it passes them.
this isn't a railgun
Sure it doesn’t have the common components of a railgun, but this one has the same principles as one, so I think of this as a more simplified railgun without the coils.
@@DZM0N
A railgun doesn't have coils 💀
A railgun has two rails through which current moves in opposite directions, with the projectile connected to the current from both rails. Duh.
Not that it matters, but technically this is a Gauss gun not a rail gun. The rail gun uses entirely current induced magnetism in the slug, the Gauss gun uses a magnetic slug.
Breaking news
Florida man was killed after getting shot with a homemade railgun
Why do you rely on impact as the method of energy transference rather than starting both the steel ball and lead projectile together at the beginning of the rail and allowing the steel ball to push the lead projectile?
Friction would have all the time in the world to kill the momentum
More than twice as much mass to accelerate. It wouldn't be as fast.
@@RR67890 because the transference of energy happens on impact
I'm confused? Where does the energy come from? Where is it stored?
i'm curious, how this setup did not violate the energy conservation principle? The mass get speed, but since is not a electomagnet, you dont need power to make it work. Did the magnets become weaker somehow with time?
Crea un altoparlante con quei magneti !
So.. if instead of the steel ball to impact your projectile you used a steel sled like a slingshot pouch.. maybe slightly better results?
Put a rail gun connecting us to Mars or even the moon. This way we can travel moons and planets quickly but also quickly stop
shudder to think what would happen if they manage to direct thermo nuclear ☢️ radiation is such a manner. . . .
What if instead of the Aluminum ball you use another magnet ball with the same weight, that the first one with momentum shoot that into a tube that directs it back to the begging ? does the sequence repeat ? Don't use stronger magnets at the end.
Can you make one that keeps going. Maybe a circle?
That would be a free energy device if it worked.
You would have to use electromagnets to do that
A quick improvement you could make for these videos is to paint some distances on the back wall(or use a piece of foam board), like 1 foot or whatnot so we could do acceleration math. Just a few lines that're a set distance apart can help us get some more numbers for how fast things are going.
Thanks for the tip 😀
Does the fact that the magnetic field is accelerating the ball mean the magnetic field is weakened? Law of conservation of energy and that.
So basically, a very expensive Ballista that work with magic
I do not understand this game...Is this physics?
This is a Gauss gun. Not a Railgun
I have a question if a one is nice enough to answer for me. I just woke up thinking of a propulsion system created from magnets. If one could push another. But instead of pushing from one end to another, Why not have it following a set path. For example a main road going straight. We use only the north side on the bottom of our test vehicle, and have our road constructed with a south field facing towards the north. Would the vehicle be able to bounce off that magnetic field and travel down the track? Would rails need to be set to the side to control the movement so the vehicle doesn't go off the tracks? How could this concept be applied if possible at all? Thank you
この方式ではない。
砲身・砲弾に直接電流を流して飛ばす星きです。
Ideally you would want frictionless tracks. What about making a cage so you have magnets encircling the track?
For that money from magnets, you can buy at least 29 toys or slingshots that throw out steel balls 50 times better and stronger, that game with magnets is meaningless !!! Very expensive way to play !!!
Excuse me I hope you answer but idk if you’ll see my comment but why is ball bearing stopping or rolling back to middle and not continue off other side??
You have such a creative brain!
Wanna to get a ❤ from you
These magnets look properly strong! Bigger the effect, easier to see what is the th8ng happening :D happy new year :)
Please see Revelation 14:12 & 18:23,Please dont go threw the PCR test, is scary what people have shown.
Now explain Misaka's railgun please, i still dont get it
I was looking for this comment
She uses electric current to generate a strong magnetic field to eject the metalic coin. Her power its based on a physic concept that created electromagnets.
Why not place a glass marble in front of ball bearing from beginning to end of track and measure the velocity of glass projectile.
So that's where all the pinballs have disappeared to.
This is so cool, love magnets,
You should take the small ball and try firing from the starting positions of your mag ball will hav more force im going to make a magnetinc bolt action gun
What happens if you put another exactly the same size magnet ball on the end instead of the steel ball? Can you try that
これはレールガンじゃなくて、ガウス加速機だろ。
Чувак собирал конструкцию думаю часов 5, чтобы сделать видео на 3 минуты? Серьезно? Мамич бы сделал 30 минут видео, да еще и 2 части. Берите пример.)))
When one dude in a comment section said homemade rail gun, he didn’t mean it
türkler kendisini belirtsin yorumda
My mom: What are you doing?
Me: Studying physics.
What I mean:
well, you're not wrong :)
Sir,an kind request pls show all your magneti in a video, pls
Thanks for the tip :) i will do it
@@MagneticGamesIT thank you sir
If you put it into a loop, what happens then? does it just keep going and going?
And this video is pretty annoying, it doesn't explain how it works and how exactly to build it, that would make the video 10x better
it wouldn't, perpetual motion does not exist
WoW!! 20tWeNty1 starting off with sum Bangerz Mate Amazing!! Clever!! Creative!
More importantly...FUN..lol.
Magnets = hours of FuN!!
これレールガンか？
ガウス加速機じゃなくて？
This is not a railgun. Railguns use the Lorentz force.
人気アップロウドのやつです
強化版ガウス加速機
That's not a rail gun, and slamming magnets like that is a good way to ruin them bit by bit.
You're a fun dude.
He knows
Gonna do this and add a car battery and some extra equipment
What if this would be done in a circle ?
This is technically not a railgun but a mass driver
I think you're getting off on the magnet slams.
Lord knows I am
Rail Gun but without photon converter and stuff
Neodymium magnets are so powerful, make it circle and it won't stop😁💪
I keep wondering if this is possible
you don't be a professor of physics so unfortunately
Happy new year if this year was good
A rail gun uses electricity not fridge magnets
Wouldn't there be infinite power if the rail was designed in a circle instead of a straight line?
No because magnets run out and require a lot of energy to create.
Even assuming that the magnets don’t ever lose their magnetization, or are periodically replaced assuming an infinite supply of magnets, we would still eventually lose energy due to friction on the track. Even assuming perfect materials, since there’s no way to capture said energy in a loop the whole point would be lost
Friction(air resistance, resistance on track), magnets aren't permanent, and temperature fluctuations all mean this isn't infinite.
Awesome satisfying sound
Would it work better to have both the accelerator and projectile start at the back snd go together? How much energy is being lost in the impact? How much would be lost with the drag from the projectile? I'm curious to know
The fbi called, they want their magnets back
if you ever have any leftover magnets I'd sure as heck love them. I'll even pay for shipping. 636 pine ridge place 27609 raleigh NC. The love of my life says I can't buy any more. I own 1.
I know what my school project will be
I'm so curious what that must have cost if I were to buy each piece?
you can find the links to the products in description :)
Dont try this at home. Try this at outside
this aint a rail gun, at least not a true one
now make it portable and a add a trigger
Boa tarde amigo. Onde vc comprou estas esferas grandes?
Link in description
Tip for future projects, laying them in place that way will eventually break them. Need to be more careful and maybe use a plastic or wooden wedge to place them
yes, neodymium is known shatter/"explode".
Sure I think at free energy. I know it doesn't exist, but it fascinates me nonetheless. What I see there is the ball accelerating and it seems to be no initial push. The guy just puts the ball on the track, and it starts to move and accelerate. Ok, maybe a small push that certainly doesn't account for that acceleration. Now that's gotta be usable somehow.
I think this guy is magneto🤔🙄