Identical Work Rates - Incredible Trick

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 окт 2024
  • This is the work rate trick you have been waiting for. Quick and very effective, helping you to tackle the hardest types of work rate question, involving the same (identical) constant rate of work.
    I offer private GRE / GMAT tutoring online at a fixed rate of $140/hr. Please get in touch via the email below, or through my tutoring website: www.gretutorlo...
    Enquiries: philip@gretutorlondon.com
    The GRE and GMAT are two of most used graduate exams for those seeking to study a Masters Degree or Masters in Business Administration (MBA) degree. The Graduate Record Exam and Graduate Management Admissions Test have been taken for over 50 years and are taken by approximately 600,000 and 300,000 people worldwide annually, respectively. These exams are typically taken between the ages of 18-40, by those who have completed, or are about to complete, their Bachelors Degree.
    Business Enquiries: philip@gretutorlondon.com
    Grateful for any support: / testedtutor If you’re now ready to get into your dream MBA program, my former student, Angel, is offering virtual private Admissions coaching. She was admitted into Harvard Business School, The Wharton School of Business, and Columbia Business School (accepted into every school she interviewed for) after graduating from UCLA with a degree in Communication. She also got 3 perfect scores on the GRE’s Analytical Writing Assessment (99th percentile).
    Here is her link - linktr.ee/ange... - and you can reach her at angellinzhu@gmail.com with the subject line, “PHILIP SENT ME.”

Комментарии • 83

  • @tommyshelby2020
    @tommyshelby2020 2 года назад +37

    Dear tested tutor,
    MASSIVE SHOUTOUT AND THANKYOU!
    Gave my GRE today(2nd attempt)
    169Q, 158V, 327 Overall
    Previously got 314 (148V, 166Q)
    As a non-native speaker, i found it really tough to do verbal section before, LITERALLY all the types of questions seemed HARD.
    My honest comment : You made it all better, I cannot say I became a pro, it still seems really difficult, but your take on the questions helped a LOTTTTTTTTT!
    THANKS AGAIN, PLEASE CONTINUE WHAT YOU'RE DOING
    I'll say it again, MOST UNDERRATED CHANNEL FOR GRE, guys this man needs to reach to every student possible, cause they deserve it and more IMPORTANTLY, HE DESERVES IT!

    • @TheTestedTutor
      @TheTestedTutor  2 года назад +5

      Thank you so much tommy and well done on your amazing improvement

    • @avinashagrahari4031
      @avinashagrahari4031 2 года назад +1

      Hey @tommy shelby can you please tell what resources did you use

    • @la8309
      @la8309 2 года назад

      Like share and subscribe :)

    • @pradyumnakumar5628
      @pradyumnakumar5628 2 года назад +1

      @@tommyshelby2020 hey tommy I have my gre scheduled on 15th nov. Please can you help me with some tips. I am getting around 162 in quant and 150 in verbal. I need to boost my score. How to contact you and how can we get these materials you mentioned above?

    • @pradyumnakumar5628
      @pradyumnakumar5628 2 года назад

      @@tommyshelby2020 please tommy can you share the dets. Would be a big big help.

  • @dhyeyshah7541
    @dhyeyshah7541 Год назад +5

    Hey Philip. Had a doubt in Question 3. The question specifies that they are working simultaneously and independently which infers that they can work on one parcel at a time and cannot interfere in other's work.
    Thinking logically, at time 0s they start labelling. The target is to label 3 parcels.
    Denisa completes at 10s and starts working on the next as she's faster in labeling than dhwani. So her labeling will end at 20s.
    By that time dhwani would completed labeling her first parcel in 12s.
    So the least time to complete labeling of 3 parcels should be 20s.
    What are your thoughts on this approach?

    • @iowacla55
      @iowacla55 9 месяцев назад

      I agree. It's a qualitatively different task from painting walls. He should have used painting or mowing instead if he wanted to illustrate the usual work-rate method.

  • @ayushivala843
    @ayushivala843 Год назад +1

    IDK, how gracefully you come up with these incredible methods

  • @nathanross5597
    @nathanross5597 Год назад +1

    Your videos never fail to show me a faster and less error prone method of solving Quant problems. I appreciate the effort you've put into these

  • @deescrete
    @deescrete Год назад +4

    This is phenomenal and I finally understand this concept. Thank you SO much. All your videos are ABSOLUTE GOLD :D.

  • @angel_accel
    @angel_accel Год назад +1

    Philip strikes again with the mind-blowing, time-saving tips !!!!!!!! THANK YOU !!!

  • @anandrajasekharan1582
    @anandrajasekharan1582 Год назад +3

    Hey, Philip. I took my GRE today and scored 312 (which should get me into all my target colleges). Prepared for the last 3 weeks by only watching your videos on quants and verbal. I owe this completely to you. Thank you soo much, and keep going with the great content :))

  • @aishwaryavaswani7669
    @aishwaryavaswani7669 2 года назад +2

    Thank you so much sir. I just gave my GRE Exam and got as much score as I needed. Solely relied on your videos and mock tests for preparation. The videos helped me lot. You are doing great work.

    • @TheTestedTutor
      @TheTestedTutor  2 года назад +1

      Thank you Aishwarya and well done! Great job

  • @_MdSagarFakir
    @_MdSagarFakir 2 года назад +1

    Eager to sit for GRE on January.
    Till I follow you from last year.

  • @moza9835
    @moza9835 2 года назад +1

    I appreciate you. Thanks for everything.

  • @keeee.986
    @keeee.986 2 года назад +1

    you are, hands down, the best teacher, EVER! i am not even exaggerating. huge respect. i want to say a lot of things abt how helpful your videos have been, but i think a thank you from the bottom of my heart would suffice! THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING U DO!!!

  • @ashishsinha9035
    @ashishsinha9035 5 месяцев назад

    Thanks Philip ! The last question was super tough.

  • @askhaddossov1635
    @askhaddossov1635 2 года назад

    Great pleasure to find that video during my practice for GMAT.
    You are the best tutor as I have ever met.
    By watching your videos I realized that to be a teacher that could teach in the correct way is the most Nobel job in the world.
    Looking forward for your new videos or even super-platform for teaching GMAT/GRE and maybe IELTS and TOEFL.
    Bless you God.

  • @MohammadRashedulIslam-i2j
    @MohammadRashedulIslam-i2j Год назад

    Life saving. Thanks for tutoring.

  • @neelamarora7651
    @neelamarora7651 6 месяцев назад

    god bless you man i was struggling with these machine problems a lot, no more.

  • @sadiayeasmin3346
    @sadiayeasmin3346 2 года назад +1

    Thanks a lot for this lecture. Looking forward to more of your amazing time saving tricks.

  • @alicewilson9958
    @alicewilson9958 2 года назад +1

    This was great. You can also use the shortcut formula WORK= no.of people performing the work x rate x time. Rate is constant so find the rate and substitute in the new equation with given work and number of people to find the time.

  • @NatureBd485
    @NatureBd485 5 месяцев назад

    Best Tutor on GRE ❤. Love from Bangladesh .

  • @ishywishy27
    @ishywishy27 2 года назад +1

    The MAD technique is amazing. Got the 2nd question right thanks to it. Thank you so much for the work you put into these videos. They have been extremely helpful. Always looking forward for more of your amazing content!!

  • @apulupapa8344
    @apulupapa8344 Год назад

    I got the 2nd and last question right. Informative videos; tricky concept explained in simplest way. Thank you.

  • @deeptinair3338
    @deeptinair3338 Год назад

    This is brilliant, thank you so much!

  • @hirmaysandesara8762
    @hirmaysandesara8762 2 года назад +3

    Dear tested tutor, thank you so much for your videos. Your quant and verbal videos very quite helpful, although I got only 320 (169, 151), I am happy with my results and you played a vital role in that :)

    • @TheTestedTutor
      @TheTestedTutor  2 года назад

      Well done Hirmay!

    • @hirmaysandesara8762
      @hirmaysandesara8762 2 года назад +1

      @@TheTestedTutor Again thank you, hope I get into a good university. I will make sure that more of peers come across your channel and your channel gets the recognition it deserves :)

  • @atharvavibhute75
    @atharvavibhute75 2 года назад +1

    Amazing method sir 👏

  • @hirmaysandesara8762
    @hirmaysandesara8762 2 года назад +1

    Glad to see you return :), hope to see the remaining quant questions from you
    There is a short-cut in the last question, if you input y=5 and z=100, you should get 12 and the only option that satisfies the constraint is the first one.

  • @VaradNair
    @VaradNair 2 года назад +1

    A perfect warm up before final mock test :D . Thanks Philip for your seamless efforts and amazing techniques.
    Alternative Way if you want to avoid fractions ;) for Q3( can be used ubiquitously) :->
    Useful formula=> Work Done = Time x Efficiency
    LCM of 12 and 10 ------ 120
    Now Dhwani takes 12 seconds , Efficiency of Dhwani = 120/12=10
    Denisa takes 10 seconds , Efficiency of Denisa = 120/10=12
    (which can be inferred as Denisa is taking lesser time so her working efficiency must be greater than Dhwani)
    Now, for 1 parcel , if they both work simultaneously , => 120/(12+10) = 120/22
    For 3 parcels = (3x120)/22 = 16.36
    Hope that helps ;).

  • @riddhidineshoza9182
    @riddhidineshoza9182 Год назад

    This trick of inverse proportionality is Just awesome ✨✨✨

  • @patlollaakhil1614
    @patlollaakhil1614 2 года назад +1

    Thank you Sir.

  • @EhsanulKarim-dn9fb
    @EhsanulKarim-dn9fb Год назад

    such an incredible trick.

  • @Jaolay
    @Jaolay Год назад +2

    Denisa can label 2 parcels in 20 seconds. Within that twenty second time frame Dhwani can complete one parcel and have 8 seconds free time.
    Thus, at the end of 20 seconds you will have 3 parcels labeled. How am I misunderstanding the question?

    • @faguni0179
      @faguni0179 4 месяца назад

      Yes I have solved the same way, even I am confused why we are finding combined rate when they are supposed to be working independently

  • @nagavedareddy5891
    @nagavedareddy5891 2 года назад

    Incredible one, thanks :)

  • @sarthakaggarwal1075
    @sarthakaggarwal1075 2 года назад +1

    Btw Your videos have been really helpful in my prep, For you doing such a munificent job we students are really grateful 🙏 Love from India 🇮🇳

    • @gowshikumara2868
      @gowshikumara2868 2 года назад

      Is the questions is same difficulty in India

  • @Nipun_Chauhan
    @Nipun_Chauhan 2 года назад +1

    Keep it up, Phillip :)

  • @vishnug2961
    @vishnug2961 2 года назад +3

    Hey Philip,
    I Recently got my official GRE scores back from ETS.
    I got 327(170Q, 157V). I watched a lot of your videos both verbal and quant.
    Thanks a lot for your playlists. Although I am from engineering background, your videos helped me brush up on some quant basics.
    I particularly enjoyed the trap questions videos playlist.
    Please keep it up!
    Thank you once again. 😊

    • @TheTestedTutor
      @TheTestedTutor  2 года назад +1

      Well done Vishnu!!

    • @prakashbhandari5824
      @prakashbhandari5824 Год назад

      Hello, Vishnu, I gave my GRE few days ago. Although my quant was very good, my verbal score was embarrassing any tips? plz... I do not have much time and I am giving 2nd attempt in a month. So, plz tell how to increase my marks in verbal?

  • @sarthakaggarwal1075
    @sarthakaggarwal1075 2 года назад +1

    Superb video tysm & really helpful, could you also share how frequent are these topics in gre??

  • @naymajahanshoshe7663
    @naymajahanshoshe7663 2 года назад +1

    Its very helpfull, thank you.

  • @alieskandari633
    @alieskandari633 2 года назад +1

    An awesome video

  • @srishylesh2935
    @srishylesh2935 Год назад

    A general formula for this: amount = no of machines x work rate x time
    (or) a = nrt

  • @sadiayeasmin3346
    @sadiayeasmin3346 2 года назад +1

    Can you please make videos on algebra related problems?

  • @anastasiastevens8999
    @anastasiastevens8999 2 года назад +2

    Hello! Thank you for your video. I've been watching all of your Quant videos for several days preparing myself for the exam. However, I do not quite understand example 3. So Dhwani and Denisa work independently, right? As we can see, Denisa is faster. So it will take Denisa 10 seconds for the first parcel and 12 seconds for Dhwani for the second parcel. Since they work independently, Denisa will be the first to finish labeling the third parcel (20 seconds). Because if we talk about real things. I understand that at this point of 16 seconds that we'll complete some percents of their work that would add up to 100 making it the third parcel. But if we look at the parcels at this point, we cannot say that they have labelled 3 parcels in total. I hope that everything that I have written is understandable.

    • @TheTestedTutor
      @TheTestedTutor  2 года назад +1

      It's not about when they independently finish a third, it is when they combined finish that third parcel. So after 12 seconds there are like 2.2 parcels done total. In the next 4 seconds about 0.7 parcels are done (adding their rates together). So to the nearest second it takes 16 seconds.
      I get what you are saying but this question assumes you can fractionally label something. :)

  • @iftekharsayeedkhan3502
    @iftekharsayeedkhan3502 Год назад +1

    In the 2nd last question, it said they worked simultaneously and independently. So shouldn’t it take 20 seconds for them to complete? As the first lable was done in 10 sec and 2nd is done 2 sec later by the other person as they were working *simultaneously and independently*. Assuming no time wasted in between the 3rd label should have been done after 8 more sec by the person who did his first labeling in 10 sec?

  • @adityadesai3755
    @adityadesai3755 Год назад

    10:45 it isn't told that working together told that working simulataneously anf independently. Therefore it should take 20 mins - at 10 min -1st by at Denis 12 th min 2nd by Dwani and at 20th min 3rd by Denis again.
    feel free to correct me if I am wrong.

  • @abundantlife4231
    @abundantlife4231 Год назад

    Respects to you sir❤️

  • @iris-py4cl
    @iris-py4cl 2 года назад

    Hey, Philip sorry that this is unrelated to the video. Just wanted to get your attention. I have been using your strategy of slow reading and fast answering for the verbal section and it does work for me. But I am not able to stop myself from re-reading to understand the sentences better. Is that okay? Coz I am in a dilemma, and my GRE is in a day. I am aiming for a 155V. I got 154V in PP2.

  • @samirgiri8070
    @samirgiri8070 5 месяцев назад

    In the last question, options (A) and (B) are correct. Which one should we pick?

  • @Tushi_07
    @Tushi_07 2 года назад

    Please make video on Linear equation where the equation of y values corresponding to the x values lowest. Btw your videos really help me out in quant section, thanks a lot.

  • @praveenasurya3211
    @praveenasurya3211 Год назад

    Hi Philip,what is the difference between identical work rate and normal?

  • @Carlo-vd1yx
    @Carlo-vd1yx Год назад +1

    Hi, I do not get the first. I would do 6 machines:12seconds=x machines:9 seconds which means 6*9/12 according to the proportions rules?

  • @harshdudhatra
    @harshdudhatra 2 года назад +1

    in Q3: wouldn't solving 60/11 first and then multiplying by 3 yield the same result as solving 180/11... it doesnt make a difference if you convert or not at the first place before multiplying by no of parcels

  • @krish.mehta.3822
    @krish.mehta.3822 Год назад

    In first question there are 6 machines, are they working at same time or in sequential order . As per question I think they are sequential.

  • @SachKol
    @SachKol 2 года назад

    I gave my GRE today and scored just 300, my English was really poor in there, and somehow I was able to solve almost all Math problems, but still I didn’t score as much as I thought I would

  • @rc_rayhan
    @rc_rayhan Год назад

    When you do the math,Math looks so easy ❤

  • @moontahafarin9305
    @moontahafarin9305 2 года назад +2

    @The Tested Tutor I couldn't understand the logic behind the steps. In Q1, don't 6 machine take total 72hrs ? Why we are multiplying machine*time then?

    • @TheTestedTutor
      @TheTestedTutor  2 года назад

      It is 72 machines-hours, not 72 hours. This is why we must divide later

    • @moontahafarin9305
      @moontahafarin9305 2 года назад +1

      @@TheTestedTutor Thank you for your response. In q1, "6 identical machine take 12s to complete a job". Is 12s cumulative time taken by these 6 machines or individual time taken for a single machine?

    • @TheTestedTutor
      @TheTestedTutor  2 года назад +1

      @@moontahafarin9305 cumulative time

    • @moontahafarin9305
      @moontahafarin9305 2 года назад

      @@TheTestedTutor Thanks a bunch for your effort and time.

  • @gowshikumara2868
    @gowshikumara2868 2 года назад +1

    Can you pls tell me if the gre exams in India is this much difficulty or is it more different

  • @abhisheksah1867
    @abhisheksah1867 Год назад

    awesome

  • @uchihaichizoku
    @uchihaichizoku 2 года назад +1

    Like is a much as you do 💪

  • @sarankoundinya5868
    @sarankoundinya5868 Год назад

    why the number of hours 5 is used as dividing number

  • @aditya.m98
    @aditya.m98 Год назад

    All I hope is you yelled out Eureka once you pieced this method altogether

  • @yashvgaikwad
    @yashvgaikwad 2 года назад

    How can we contact you ? Is there any email or instagram handle cause we really need some advice regarding the sops n lors and right now you are the only person we trust.