As a teenager, I got to see Apollo XVI full rocket stack waiting for liftoff on the pad for launch as part of a KSC tour. The Saturn V was one huge vehicle! We also got to see the inside of the vehicle assembly building (if I recall, it was called vertical assembly building back them). The huge scale of everything really knocked me out. That’s one of those things you really have to experience first hand to fully appreciate. I am thankful the US space program operated mostly in the open and the experience was possible.
@@caseyjrthehybridengine3444 Well, it certainly made a lasting impression. Here it is 51 year later and I’m still awed by the Apollo vehicle. I wish I could have seen a launch. The feature length film Moonwalk One made at the time of the Apollo program is available here on RUclips. It captures a lot of the social energy surrounding the Apollo program.
The people narrating the NASA launches, and even most of the SpaceX launches sound like high school kids. Very little of the tension and seriousness from back then. Almost like we're watching a game show...
And now, over a half-century later, we may have a path forward with SpaceX's Starship to get back to the moon. I watched the first moon landings as a little boy. Lord willing I'll get to see the next ones.
Remember watching this as a kid. I believe it was the only unmanned launch ever broadcast. The "hanging ceiling" in CBS's broadcast trailer/studio fell in on Walter Cronkite from the sonic shock wave. Surely that video is on RUclips somewhere. What an awesome, awesome technical accomplishment. Wish I might have been present for a Saturn V launch.
and whats cool, is here soon, there is a chance you can get to see a rocket even bigger and more powerful go up in the next few years. im excited, but doing my best to remain skeptical. i missed out seeing the Saturn rockets go, so i am really looking forward to the upcoming beasts
You clowns are clueless, why have we never been back? It took the Boeing 737, 29 test runs to fly, and we are going to hit the moon on the first shot ? Wake up to the money laundering fraud of NASA sheep ! It never happened! All fake just like our fake printed currency! Go back to school and get some more programming!
a terra e a atmosfera não giram ? pq então embaixo do foguete as nuvens estão paradas, assim como o movimento da terra ??? sim, ainda bem que tem gente que não acredita nessa mentira !!! a verdade perdura sobre esse sistema mentiroso ! fogo saindo da combustão, em pleno vacuo do espaço kkkkkkk ridiculos
Because the heat-shield is ablative (burns off slowly) and carries the vast majority of the heat away as it ablates. The phenolic resin that the heat-shield carbon is mixed with, turns to a gas along the whole surface of the shield, which makes it mostly opaque to the extreme radiant heat along the front of the bow shock, so it works beautifully.
It's called an ablative heat shield... basically its an epoxy resin cast into a honeycomb structure that slowly chars and burns away in the heat, taking the heat with it. It's an excellent insulator so it doesn't conduct heat back through it to the underlying structure. Plus the heat pulse only lasts a few minutes, during which time the spacecraft slows down from 25,000 mph to about the speed of sound or so, and then slows further once it enters denser lower atmosphere... then drogue and main parachutes slow it for splashdown. Later! OL J R: )
Can someone explain to me why the interstage ring appears to have flame coursing through it after jettison? Seems like the ullage motors on the second stage were done and the second stage engines weren't lit yet.
The second stage engines fired about 5 seconds after stage separation and well before the interstage skirt was jettisoned. When the skirt fell away, it would have gone through the exhaust which is why it is burns up somewhat. The second stage engines were well and truly alight by that point This video shows that. After stage separation, you can see the second stage engines fire up before the skirt fell away. Cue up to 2:05. This is about the best view of this occurring on any footage I have seen. ruclips.net/video/48TC_rwSLvU/видео.html
The exhaust of the second stage J-2 engines was transparent, as they burned hydrogen and oxygen. No carbon in the plume. That's why you can see everything behind the rocket as well as the interstage clearly as the ring separates.
I live about a mile from Aerojet in Canoga Park...and they have an F1 engine in the parking lot...you can see it from the street. Every time I see it, I am truly astonished at the engineering involved in creating something that could stand the pressure required to burn 6000 lbs of fuel per second (6000 lbs = 3 tons. 3 tons x 5 engine equals 15 tons/30,000 lbs of fuel per second for the 1st stage) for 2+ minutes.
They were ejected automatically, parachuted down into the ocean, and had tracking beacons radioing a homing signal to recovery teams. Not all of them were recovered, as malfunctions happened. On the third stage, the cameras sent their images down by telemetry since there was no way to recover them from orbit. They had flown an S-IVB stage on a Saturn IB previously with cameras filming through special windows into the liquid hydrogen tank, so they could see and better understand the behavior of the propellants in the tank during the coast phase of the flight when the tanks were at zero gee... There's probably footage of it here on RUclips... OL J R :)
@@amain325 it was a phenomenal achievement, because it had never been done before, as you said, they had to develop and build everything from the ground up.
I'm curious. On reentry, the capsule basically "skipped" on the atmosphere. I've never seen this before, Was this a test, or an actual braking manoeuvre? Did the manned missions do the same?
The capsule didn't just pick one point and come straight in, it had the ability to steer itself in a manner of speaking. By shifting its centre of gravity, it could alter its trajectory and it would re-enter along a curved path. I've forgotten most of the technicalities in re-entry, but this video might fill in the blanks. I don't know if this will answer your question, but this is an interesting video if you can spare a half hour or so. It's well worth watching. ruclips.net/video/MTKHqfloB7Q/видео.html
Space exploration can make humanity proud of itself. Apollo made America 🇺🇸 and the world united in a single emotional moment for the 1st time since the end of the second World War 🌎 ❤️
A recovery helicopter dropped Navy swimmers into the water. The swimmer's first task was to stabilize the command module by attaching and inflating a custom-made flotation collar around the blunt end of the spacecraft. Hope this helps.
Umm... are you serious? Camera pods were fixed onto the rocket to film stage separation and the rocket flying was filmed from the ground using telephoto lenses. You can find out for yourself how the film pods were ejected and picked up.
I mean 3 astronauts were burned alive, and another 3 almost were stranded in deep space. but other than that and several other deaths in trainer planes, it was 'flawless'. Maybe don't white wash it. Humans gave their lives so we could walk on the moon. Wives lost their husbands, children lost their fathers. I doubt Gus Grissom's family thought it "flawless".
@@howdareyou41 lighten up Francis. Don't be an emotional dope. How many people died in aviation before it became commonplace? Space travel has NEVER been unsafe. As a program, Apollo's contractors learned from the mistakes and shortcomings they made with the command module and redesigned it. The Saturn 5 is testament to the 12 million parts working together to get man to the Moon not once, but many times.
@@jamesphilip6737 that still doesn't make it flawless. btw this is also an old apollo hoaxtard line used to try to discredit apollo through their personal incredulity ("there's no way it could have been flawless, thus it was a hoax").
Anyone with eyes like yours, or maybe more broadly = people who worked in the "picture, photography, camera, television, film industry, etc." would have cried "foul" immediately if the Apollo 11 moonshot was fake. As an "Electronics Junkie" for decades, I know the U.S.S.R. would have squawked if telecommunications weren't genuine. But again, I just don't think Photography People would have been fooled! @@digitalblasphemy1100
@@digitalblasphemy1100 Well, it probably was originally. It looks to me more like just plain color fading of the film. It's to be expected after 56 years. However, I too, would love to see it color corrected.
@@GeistDerQuelle Statements like that reveal ignorance of Applied Physics & Engineering....Actually, people like that discount other's major achievements to take the focus off their own miserable inability to succeed.🤡🎪
Wasn't the USA space race with the then Soviet Union as much to do with developing ICBM missile technology - like MIRV - for use against hostile states during the Cold War ?
Yes. The rocket efforts in the 40s and 50s were for ballistic missles. The Soviets used the R-7 ICBM architecture to launch Sputnik and all subsequent manned missions (Vostok, Voskhod, and Soyuz). Our first three manned launchers (Redstone, Atlas, and Titan) were repurposed missles. The Apollo Saturn 1B and V were specifically designed for people, but the technology was certainly leveraged from missle tech.
How can a rocket move in empty space with no air. It has thrust but in order for that to be effective, it needs a thin layer of air, at the very least.
Source taken from Nasa: "In a rocket engine , fuel and a source of oxygen, called an oxidizer, are mixed and exploded in a combustion chamber. The combustion produces hot exhaust which is passed through a nozzle to accelerate the flow and produce thrust."
@@vasco2016 Thank you, but thrust doesn't produce any movement if there is no air, on which it can "stand". They say in outer space is no air, so how can there be movement. A butterfly moves it wings, and uses the air to move, if a child stands up, it uses the ground under it's feet to move it's body
@@wolfbbq6076 I'm reading about it, still do not understand where this thrust is coming from. A jet engine sucks in air, and releases it as a hot gas stream from the exhaust, that's how a jet flies in the air. When a rocket is launched it is pushing against the air layers, for as long as it is not in space. But what after that? One example of a rocket engine is an ion engine, which would produce an ion stream with the help of neon gas, according to the theory. Can this really produce a thrust, in an empty airless space, enough to move a rocket? and to correct his course, when necessary?
Astonished people think this is real. Did you NOT hear the narrator say "in this animation"?? The only real footage was the launch and capsule after flight. Good Lord people are stupid.
@@robertcampbell6349 no theory?? just bieing mean! my short bus isnt fast , but im the driver and ill pick you up anytime... how fast does the earth supposedly spin? at least what do the so called scientist say?
1) Almost exactly 0.0007 RPM 2) The Earth is going around the Sun at about 67,000 MPH but there is also a net motion of the Solar System around the galaxy and also of the galaxy relative to other nearby galaxies.
Love how these announcers screw up their basic science. The capsule would have looked like a meteor from space. Not a meteorite. A meteor becomes a meteorite only if it lands on the earth.
@@rutabagasteu Most "science reporters" are merely assigned to the task, not necessarily educated or trained in science. It's far worse today when writers don't even know the rules of basic grammar, let alone study their topic or take a 60 second glance at a wikipedia page.
@Smee Self All that doesnt change the fact that the footage is fake as f...... If we were able to go to the moon and had gone, there would be no question about it. If NASA could provide real photographs of the big ball earth instead of composite images, then they would. The heliocentric agenda has been in the works for centuries and television really stepped up its game. Dont forget that you believe what you dont know. Its kind of like religion. You've been taught not to trust your senses of observable reality and defend your captors. And thats what you do.
@@Riptions Says the guy who grew up in an era where he thinks everything just is made because he expects it to be. Grow up son. get an education. And stop thinking the earth is flat. That's just retarded.
can you heart me Pegasus Galaktica 7 Darcho Jandreoski can you heart me you are now in the Space können Sie Pegasus Galaktica 7 Roboter Darcho Jandreoski sich errinern an die Mond Landschaften
Just about everyone, except for you guys who couldn't fabricate a vacuum chamber if your life depended on it. Prove me wrong. What is your background, education, experience?
@@kitcanyon658 Explain in detail how Earth's atmosphere can Co exist with the supposed vacuum of space without forcibly being sucked in like in every demonstrable experiment where a vacuum is used?
@@quailshootr6389 : LOL. A flatter! The guys who swallow down a magical dome, a see through moon that is a type of magical light bulb and that claim people in new Zealand can see the sun 6,000 miles further away than Canadians can on the same day. Get en education, son. It’s embarrassing. To answer your question forces dictate the movement and form of matter. So where is your force diagram of a volume of air at different altitudes? What’s that? You have zero education in physics or engineering? Gee, go figure. However, please show us a single sealed container here on earth that has a pressure gradient inside it. We’ll wait. Unless, of course you didn’t even know that the atmosphere on earth isn’t the same pressure? Hard fail, son.
@@stumpgrinderbear7034 I know. I had a globutard respond with the " you know ship's go below the horizon because you cannot see the bottom of the boat" smh
They had to invent things that had never existed. Build and test two totally unproven Space Crafts. Then train those to pilot them. It's beyond amazing how much they learned doing it. Then America went limp living off the stuff they invented. I don't thing Americans have it in them too do it again.. They have no skilled engineers needed too do it. Much less the blue collar workers to build all them parts..
So fake. At 12:28 how did they get the camera to film all that..? Seriously...not all of this is real. We know some is fake. It's understood. Not a conspiracy FYI this is a joke. I'm moking some of the other comments
Particularly interesting reading the comments TBH all im seeing is German rocket technology from the late nineteen 30"s and most certainly no evidence of the shape of this place we call home
@smeeself You lined up for an experimental EUA vaccine without informed consent. You can't even sue for medical injury. So when it comes to understanding flat earth and how space is fake, you do the same thing. Deflect and cower. Orbit is a lie, and your precocious vaccine is not safe.
@@kitcanyon658 You can't prove a spinning ball earth. You have to rely on model calculations, unproven theories, and fallacies. Prove me wrong. Give me your best (or several) proof the globe is real. Dog forget. No fallacies, no assumptions or references to models or theories. Actual observational proof.
@@CRYPTICGATE.Official "Dog forget"? Are you not able to conjure a two word sentence without help? That's classic flatter education there. Oh, so you claim the earth is flat, do you? Where is your proof? And guess what, being a 7yr old and just crying, "Fake" isn't proof. Well, since you can't proof it then perhaps you'd be man enough to defend flatter claims. Are you? Are you one just another flatter coward, running away and throwing out insults or emojis to make the other flatter lemmings be impressed by you? FE claims the sun sets north of due west in December. Anyone with a compass can see it sets south of due west. How come FE can't get that right? FE claims the sun circles about a flat world between the tropicals latitudes. However, anyone with a brainstem can go out and measure the sun's compass heading and elevation angle and see that the actual motion of the sun can never follow FE claims. How come FE can't get that right? I mean, the solar system and globe model and math gets the sun's position in the sky correct 24/7 and for every point on the planet. Shouldn't you "men" at FE be able to do at least as good? LOL. Fail. And finally, please defend the retarded FE claim that people in New Zealand can see the sun almost 7,000 miles further away than Canadians can on the very same day of the year. What's that? You didn't know FE claimed that with you lame map and model? Why didn't you know that? I mean, you did actually "research" FE, didn't you? And as for your question of me, sure, I'll show you proof. Just outline what would be allowed under the flatter bylaws. If you can't outline a predetermined set of parameters of reality then all you'll do is claim fake. Right? I mean, that's all you'll ever have so please detail out acceptance criteria, and I do mean in detail. At this point it is best if you just insult me and slink away. In order to save face to the lemmings in your FE echo chambers do not, at all costs, ever even consider trying to answer my questions. I wouldn't' want to make you look bad.
Isn't it ashame that if it weren't for the lost of all that telemetry data that we would be able to travel back to the moon?💁♀️ Isn't it more of ashame that people still accept all nasa's lies as truth?🐑
They didn't lose the telemetry data. Also,that has nothing to do with the lack of manned moon missions over the last few decades. NASA have never been caught lying. Be harder to trick.
@@GuardianSoulkeeper I love it when they trot out that old trope about 'losing the technology' when there are unused rockets on display, engines on display and blueprints freely available! Yeah, definitely lost it all...
Imagine recording over your own live apollo footage. Then losing all of your apollo tapes. The same people that trust NASA are the same ones lining up for a EUA vaccine that they can't even sue for. Trust the magic wizard on the TV for life. NO REFUNDS.
All I want to know is , why do we need 5G networks when all we really need is a landline phone network that President Nixon had in 1969 !! He was able to phone the moon in real time , NO delays and with NO drop out of reception !! In 2023 if I go 3hrs away from a major city my mobile reception is shit !! 💁♂️🤷♂️
@@robertcampbell6349 So , you are a student of the Cognitive Dissonance College then ! When you you can't answer a question with a logical answer you default into ad hominem replies .... Got it !! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡
@@franknorthcuttmusic Lol .... 2.6 seconds delay !! 🤣🤣 You noobs believe that whole " official " story !! But yet the technology still can't be replicated en masse in 2023 ?? That's like how the newspapers in the U.S had the photo's of the " landing " within hours so they could print them in the papers the very next day ! Remembering the printing process and lead up to running the actual presses , how was that done ?? The camera man on the moon used their wifi router to send it to Honeysuckle then Houston as well ?? Marvellous how all of this occured in 1969 and up until 3G tech time we in the rest of the world weren't sending anything instantly ..... apart from a fax !!! Maybe the guy on the moon faxed the photo's back eh !! ...... via that really long cable they installed during the flight !! 😊👍👍 🤣🤣🤣
Donald You might not like him but he is a about america. And if you can't support that you need to leave or show something more american than him. And if you can't you had better get behind him , why's we still have a country. We are running out of time.
I love that photo of "Trump 2024" flags being made in China. That's how much Trump cares about American workers. So why are all Republicans traitors? Is it just about the money?
This looks primitive. Tesla gave us much more advanced technology. The world would have been a much better place if not for oligarchies suppressed that technology.
Well it would do by today's standards 🙄. Usually when you hear people rambling on about ancient, or suppressed technology, it's from science illiterate idiots, who mistake their overactive imaginations for reality.
I’ve spoken to an engineer who witnessed Apollo IV launch. No words can describe what everyone saw that night but it was a majestic site.
EXCELLENT! So great to see these early Apollo misses that were of groundbreaking importance at the time. Love it!
As a teenager, I got to see Apollo XVI full rocket stack waiting for liftoff on the pad for launch as part of a KSC tour. The Saturn V was one huge vehicle! We also got to see the inside of the vehicle assembly building (if I recall, it was called vertical assembly building back them). The huge scale of everything really knocked me out. That’s one of those things you really have to experience first hand to fully appreciate. I am thankful the US space program operated mostly in the open and the experience was possible.
Wow how was it😯
@@caseyjrthehybridengine3444 Well, it certainly made a lasting impression. Here it is 51 year later and I’m still awed by the Apollo vehicle. I wish I could have seen a launch. The feature length film Moonwalk One made at the time of the Apollo program is available here on RUclips. It captures a lot of the social energy surrounding the Apollo program.
@@wtmayhew okay…….. yeah very nice
nasa cerebrate 50 years of shame by never send even one robot go back to apollo landing site 😂
@@yoskarokuto3553 There has been fantastic space exploration, but relatively less interest in the Moon. That’s too bad.
There’s nothing quite like the voice of a 1960’s narrator….
I thought the same. It's a familiar voice; do you know who it is?
The people narrating the NASA launches, and even most of the SpaceX launches sound like high school kids. Very little of the tension and seriousness from back then. Almost like we're watching a game show...
A lot of this footage was used on the original Star Trek episode "Assignment: Earth." Provided by NASA and preserved forever on HD Blu-ray.
My Dad helped to build the Cranes used to build to buildings and hoist the Apollo sections together
Mine worked on the parachutes for the capsule...
@@DJ-bh1ju Nice
And now, over a half-century later, we may have a path forward with SpaceX's Starship to get back to the moon. I watched the first moon landings as a little boy. Lord willing I'll get to see the next ones.
Remember watching this as a kid. I believe it was the only unmanned launch ever broadcast. The "hanging ceiling" in CBS's broadcast trailer/studio fell in on Walter Cronkite from the sonic shock wave. Surely that video is on RUclips somewhere. What an awesome, awesome technical accomplishment. Wish I might have been present for a Saturn V launch.
Bell อยู่บ้านแม่ริน
หัวกู เแม่แล้วมึงไป
@@ดารินทองเชิญ reported for gibberish and spam.
and whats cool, is here soon, there is a chance you can get to see a rocket even bigger and more powerful go up in the next few years. im excited, but doing my best to remain skeptical. i missed out seeing the Saturn rockets go, so i am really looking forward to the upcoming beasts
เบล
@@millermonsterair มึงเอาของให้เพื่อนที่
i wish these were a higher resolution
16mm movie film, no HD video in 1967!
@@warrentaylor8428 of course there was no HD in 1967 but 16mm is considerably higher res than 480 as in this video.
@@warrentaylor8428 Being born in 1958, I remember even 8mm home movies having better clarity.
And there's still folks out there that think this stuff never happened...
You just can't cure stupid.
Especially when stupidity makes them feel extra smart and special.
And that the Earth is flat, and a thousand other absurdities
@@amain325 Tell them: If earth was flat, cats would have already pushed everything off the edge.🤡🎪
You clowns are clueless, why have we never been back? It took the Boeing 737, 29 test runs to fly, and we are going to hit the moon on the first shot ? Wake up to the money laundering fraud of NASA sheep ! It never happened! All fake just like our fake printed currency! Go back to school and get some more programming!
a terra e a atmosfera não giram ? pq então embaixo do foguete as nuvens estão paradas, assim como o movimento da terra ??? sim, ainda bem que tem gente que não acredita nessa mentira !!! a verdade perdura sobre esse sistema mentiroso !
fogo saindo da combustão, em pleno vacuo do espaço kkkkkkk ridiculos
Can any one tell me how such a small thing can resist 5000 degrees of heat and not disintegrate, however remain 70 degrees inside?
Easy answer, because of rocket science.
The MIT Vault has an episode on the heat shielding of the Apollo missions.
Because the heat-shield is ablative (burns off slowly) and carries the vast majority of the heat away as it ablates.
The phenolic resin that the heat-shield carbon is mixed with, turns to a gas along the whole surface of the shield, which makes it mostly opaque to the extreme radiant heat along the front of the bow shock, so it works beautifully.
It's called an ablative heat shield... basically its an epoxy resin cast into a honeycomb structure that slowly chars and burns away in the heat, taking the heat with it. It's an excellent insulator so it doesn't conduct heat back through it to the underlying structure. Plus the heat pulse only lasts a few minutes, during which time the spacecraft slows down from 25,000 mph to about the speed of sound or so, and then slows further once it enters denser lower atmosphere... then drogue and main parachutes slow it for splashdown. Later! OL J R: )
Answer: NASA's secret sauce!
When it says 'NO SMOKING' in ten-feet-high letters, you don't smoke.
Can someone explain to me why the interstage ring appears to have flame coursing through it after jettison? Seems like the ullage motors on the second stage were done and the second stage engines weren't lit yet.
The second stage engines fired about 5 seconds after stage separation and well before the interstage skirt was jettisoned. When the skirt fell away, it would have gone through the exhaust which is why it is burns up somewhat. The second stage engines were well and truly alight by that point
This video shows that. After stage separation, you can see the second stage engines fire up before the skirt fell away. Cue up to 2:05. This is about the best view of this occurring on any footage I have seen.
ruclips.net/video/48TC_rwSLvU/видео.html
The exhaust of the second stage J-2 engines was transparent, as they burned hydrogen and oxygen. No carbon in the plume. That's why you can see everything behind the rocket as well as the interstage clearly as the ring separates.
I challenge anyone to go to cape Canaveral and explore everything. The museum is eye opening.
LMAO!!! 🤣😂😄
Dumb dumb dumb
Love those pre-CGI graphics. The whole presentation was simple, clear and straightforward. What more could you ask?
What CGI-graphics from 60/70's? How stupid you are? Remember 80's Commodore 64 and try to figure how real graphics was...
@@mfrantti Did you even read the whole comment?
@@backenfn Thank you.
You are incredibly silly.
Why mate? Why be a jackass? Did your boyfriend break up with you? Just smile & be grateful for every day god gives you,
I live about a mile from Aerojet in Canoga Park...and they have an F1 engine in the parking lot...you can see it from the street.
Every time I see it, I am truly astonished at the engineering involved in creating something that could stand the pressure required to burn 6000 lbs of fuel per second (6000 lbs = 3 tons. 3 tons x 5 engine equals 15 tons/30,000 lbs of fuel per second for the 1st stage) for 2+ minutes.
5:55 that is the old tail service masts design
It's still amazing that man has built something such a giant firecracker that can shoot up into the sky all these years and decades later😮
Music sounds like that of "Thunderbirds are Go!"
How to get a FILM canister back from first, second, and third stages?
They were ejected automatically, parachuted down into the ocean, and had tracking beacons radioing a homing signal to recovery teams. Not all of them were recovered, as malfunctions happened. On the third stage, the cameras sent their images down by telemetry since there was no way to recover them from orbit. They had flown an S-IVB stage on a Saturn IB previously with cameras filming through special windows into the liquid hydrogen tank, so they could see and better understand the behavior of the propellants in the tank during the coast phase of the flight when the tanks were at zero gee... There's probably footage of it here on RUclips... OL J R :)
@@lukestrawwalker it's a whole episode for Vintage Space!! (If not already there, of course)
Hey! Thanks! That was fast!
@@lukestrawwalker first ever fiber optics for those tank cameras.
I'm sure they had practice from running project "Corona".
I wish I had been able to watch the liftoff of a Saturn 5.
So true
My family had just moved to Orlando the year before, we watch pretty much all the launches….. really cool stuff.
I watched it on TV in the UK as a child, it’s in my opinion the greatest achievement of my life time.
@@stevenclarke5606 Perhaps of all time considering everything that had to be developed and function correctly, taking humans to land on the moon
@@amain325 it was a phenomenal achievement, because it had never been done before, as you said, they had to develop and build everything from the ground up.
they really did a great job making these. they would show them to us in school.
Called programming la mente
I'm curious. On reentry, the capsule basically "skipped" on the atmosphere. I've never seen this before, Was this a test, or an actual braking manoeuvre? Did the manned missions do the same?
The capsule didn't just pick one point and come straight in, it had the ability to steer itself in a manner of speaking. By shifting its centre of gravity, it could alter its trajectory and it would re-enter along a curved path. I've forgotten most of the technicalities in re-entry, but this video might fill in the blanks.
I don't know if this will answer your question, but this is an interesting video if you can spare a half hour or so. It's well worth watching.
ruclips.net/video/MTKHqfloB7Q/видео.html
Space exploration can make humanity proud of itself. Apollo made America 🇺🇸 and the world united in a single emotional moment for the 1st time since the end of the second World War 🌎 ❤️
Where dose the inflatable ring get dispatched from ? when is it inflated ? I have never heard of any mention of this anywhere ?????
A recovery helicopter dropped Navy swimmers into the water. The swimmer's first task was to stabilize the command module by attaching and inflating a custom-made flotation collar around the blunt end of the spacecraft. Hope this helps.
Saturn V was a masterpiece
Was this passed off as real footage when it aired? Or did they say it was a simulation?
Who took the video of the Rocket in space? Who was flying beside the rocket recording the rocket flying?😢
Umm... are you serious?
Camera pods were fixed onto the rocket to film stage separation and the rocket flying was filmed from the ground using telephoto lenses.
You can find out for yourself how the film pods were ejected and picked up.
my grandkids will never see something like this ..... but worse , they will never see "concorde" as it was a daily sight 😞
SLS-Orion launched last week.
I remember seeing the footage of the 2nd stage structure used in a K-Tel TV commercial as a girl!
I was 6 miles south at Hanger C. Broke windows in the building.
Incredible how the components all came from the USA, from different locations and they all worked together flawlessly at each launch.
Almost every launch came with problems noways many missions would have been aborted for safety reasons
I mean 3 astronauts were burned alive, and another 3 almost were stranded in deep space. but other than that and several other deaths in trainer planes, it was 'flawless'. Maybe don't white wash it. Humans gave their lives so we could walk on the moon. Wives lost their husbands, children lost their fathers. I doubt Gus Grissom's family thought it "flawless".
@@howdareyou41 lighten up Francis. Don't be an emotional dope. How many people died in aviation before it became commonplace? Space travel has NEVER been unsafe. As a program, Apollo's contractors learned from the mistakes and shortcomings they made with the command module and redesigned it. The Saturn 5 is testament to the 12 million parts working together to get man to the Moon not once, but many times.
@@jamesphilip6737 that still doesn't make it flawless. btw this is also an old apollo hoaxtard line used to try to discredit apollo through their personal incredulity ("there's no way it could have been flawless, thus it was a hoax").
How are people not reading between the lines here....
The film is in great shape. Too bad you didn't color time it. I'd love to see it as good as it could look. Thanks for these uploads.
Sorry, I don't understand this comment. What do you mean?
@@j.fabianmeier3705 color grading or timing is matching the colors of the real scene, item, subject etc. The colors are incorrect. White balance too.
Anyone with eyes like yours, or maybe more broadly = people who worked in the "picture, photography, camera, television, film industry, etc." would have cried "foul" immediately if the Apollo 11 moonshot was fake. As an "Electronics Junkie" for decades, I know the U.S.S.R. would have squawked if telecommunications weren't genuine. But again, I just don't think Photography People would have been fooled! @@digitalblasphemy1100
@@digitalblasphemy1100 Well, it probably was originally. It looks to me more like just plain color fading of the film. It's to be expected after 56 years.
However, I too, would love to see it color corrected.
Where we live
What an ancient technology! Spacex can only dream about it ))
But SpaceX is achieving total mastery of a spacecraft's rapid unscheduled disassembly.
Ha, the music sounds like it's from a B sci-fi movie.
amazing that this rocket took us to the moon!!
No one was or will go to the moon
@@GeistDerQuelle Stop being stupid.
@@GeistDerQuelle Statements like that reveal ignorance of Applied Physics & Engineering....Actually, people like that
discount other's major achievements to take the focus off their own miserable inability to succeed.🤡🎪
App you idiot wake up
@@GeistDerQuelleShut up for god's sake.
no mention of the "pogo" effect from the first stage
It was observed the first time on Apollo V.
104thDIVTimberwolf Apollo 6 was the worst case.
@@104thDIVTimberwolf Apollo 5 was an unmanned test of the LEM on a Saturn IB, not even the same rocket LOL:)
@@lukestrawwalker, you're right, of course. It was Apollo 4 and 6. 5 and 7 were on IBs.
Wasn't the USA space race with the then Soviet Union as much to do with developing ICBM missile technology - like MIRV - for use against hostile states during the Cold War ?
Yes. The rocket efforts in the 40s and 50s were for ballistic missles. The Soviets used the R-7 ICBM architecture to launch Sputnik and all subsequent manned missions (Vostok, Voskhod, and Soyuz).
Our first three manned launchers (Redstone, Atlas, and Titan) were repurposed missles. The Apollo Saturn 1B and V were specifically designed for people, but the technology was certainly leveraged from missle tech.
Sutra ujutro sam kod tebe.
Finally after ~55 years, we are doing Apollo-4 one better with the SpaceX Starship @ Starbase Texas !!
You mean SLS-Orion.
8:00 the ''Allah'' name on Arabic
Pareidolia.
Nope, just clouds; not sky Daddy graffiti.
@Kian Der Simp So? Your permission wasn't required,
bro.👍
Shut up with your pedo worshiping b.s.
@@skateboardingjesus4006 Comments made by "Fatherless" clowns.🤡🎪
get to 5:54 the you"ll flames
I love you all and anyone reading this, the firmament is real. This is fun to imagine though.
BrooksBeyondBabylon. Thanks for the spirit behind your comment . But I'm afraid you have the fantasy and reality back to front.
"Weighs more than a destroyer". Just a bit of hyperbole. A modern destroyer weighs ~8000 tons, the Saturn V, 6.2 million pounds. Do the math....
They did. The contemporary US destroyers were the Forrest Sherman class, about 2,800 tons standard loading, a bit over 4000 tons full load.
Why are you comparing a “modern destroyer”? As the above comment points out, destroyers back then weighed less.
The man who fell from heaven , created hell in paradise .
Pretty awesome what they could do back then and imagine what they can do in the future? ..Artemis🚀👍
Giving flat earthers migraines.
I'm sure they have an "explanation" for it!
@@zigner No they don't, they just claim fake and end with Freemasons.
Ever since October 24, 1946
You can put a flat earther on a rocket and still would want proof of curvature.
No migraine. Just belly laughs
How can a rocket move in empty space with no air. It has thrust but in order for that to be effective, it needs a thin layer of air, at the very least.
Please don't procreate and pass your ridiculous amount of ignorance on to others.
Source taken from Nasa:
"In a rocket engine , fuel and a source of oxygen, called an oxidizer, are mixed and exploded in a combustion chamber. The combustion produces hot exhaust which is passed through a nozzle to accelerate the flow and produce thrust."
@@vasco2016 Thank you, but thrust doesn't produce any movement if there is no air, on which it can "stand". They say in outer space is no air, so how can there be movement. A butterfly moves it wings, and uses the air to move, if a child stands up, it uses the ground under it's feet to move it's body
Well Joni you have confirmed that you know nothing about rocket propulsion go do some research.
@@wolfbbq6076 I'm reading about it, still do not understand where this thrust is coming from. A jet engine sucks in air, and releases it as a hot gas stream from the exhaust, that's how a jet flies in the air. When a rocket is launched it is pushing against the air layers, for as long as it is not in space. But what after that? One example of a rocket engine is an ion engine, which would produce an ion stream with the help of neon gas, according to the theory. Can this really produce a thrust, in an empty airless space, enough to move a rocket? and to correct his course, when necessary?
If they want to maintain the lie, they should turn off comments. A lot of people waking up
No, only retards who couldn't understand physics or engineering trying desperately to make themselves feel better.
How are things on the short school bus.
Eh Nani
??
@@sixbox9634 space travel is fake. Try and catch up
💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
Liquid Oxygen, No Smoking painted on tank... next to the launch pad...
Got to love the comment section. Most people who look into this now knows it's BS
Okay, prove it?
so true. the brainwashing is slowly being undone. some schools here are noe teaching about
prof auguste piccard instead of this
@@umahlekisa Huh?
Sorry I don't understand gibberish.
@@serinatang4184 thats ok. enjoy life. dont be a beta
Are you a troll or genuinely stupid?
5:38
I can tell they were scared for life if something went wrong
The bots and minions try to shame us with their replies, but anyone with a brain can see who's really winning
Astonished people think this is real. Did you NOT hear the narrator say "in this animation"?? The only real footage was the launch and capsule after flight. Good Lord people are stupid.
I think you are pretty stupid.
Good Lord, he's looking in a mirror!
Lots of in-flight photos from the Apollo 4 mission.
Sulpiculous Gallus M
What!? Are they planning to go to the moon?
That will never work.
How to give information without giving information.
Animation from the beginning
no son, that's just lazy people talk - uneducated and lazy.
Yes, there is animation in short parts of this video but not much, and certainly not from the beginning.
how fast does the earth spin? how fast is the earth traveling through space? 😂😂
How fast does your short school bus go?
@@robertcampbell6349 no theory?? just bieing mean! my short bus isnt fast , but im the driver and ill pick you up anytime...
how fast does the earth supposedly spin? at least what do the so called scientist say?
1) Almost exactly 0.0007 RPM 2) The Earth is going around the Sun at about 67,000 MPH but there is also a net motion of the Solar System around the galaxy and also of the galaxy relative to other nearby galaxies.
About one revolution per 24 hours, not very fast
Love how these announcers screw up their basic science. The capsule would have looked like a meteor from space. Not a meteorite. A meteor becomes a meteorite only if it lands on the earth.
I watched these launches. Apparently many of the science reporters back then didn't know much science.
@@rutabagasteu Most "science reporters" are merely assigned to the task, not necessarily educated or trained in science. It's far worse today when writers don't even know the rules of basic grammar, let alone study their topic or take a 60 second glance at a wikipedia page.
@@outerrealm I know. I saw several science reporters get corrected on air by someone sitting near them on launch day. Edit. Back in the 1950s.
The capsule did land though, so meteorite is technically correct
Even more amazing of what Elon Musk has built isn't it?
if they just never would of released the moonlanding footage, maybe i could believe it happened.
@Smee Self Exactly, the evidence is in the form of video. After examination of the footage, you dont "believe", but you "know" its fake.
@Smee Self All that doesnt change the fact that the footage is fake as f...... If we were able to go to the moon and had gone, there would be no question about it. If NASA could provide real photographs of the big ball earth instead of composite images, then they would. The heliocentric agenda has been in the works for centuries and television really stepped up its game. Dont forget that you believe what you dont know. Its kind of like religion. You've been taught not to trust your senses of observable reality and defend your captors. And thats what you do.
Such statements always reveal little knowledge, or, total ignorance of Applied Physics & Engineering.
@@lilblackduc7312 When you find out that the majority of people are obedient morons, and you are in the majority, you may want to pause and reflect.
@@Riptions Says the guy who grew up in an era where he thinks everything just is made because he expects it to be.
Grow up son. get an education.
And stop thinking the earth is flat. That's just retarded.
Die wolken bilden was soviel wie
Allah/Gott auf Arabisch heißt
Pareidolia.
So that just showed the bible is right shit hey. That was water for sure.
Great cartoon story 😂
Shameful that people still fall for this
can you heart me Pegasus Galaktica 7 Darcho Jandreoski can you heart me you are now in the Space können Sie Pegasus Galaktica 7 Roboter Darcho Jandreoski sich errinern an die Mond Landschaften
NASA (challenger)
Need another seven astronauts
Anybody still believe this bullshit in 2023?
Just about everyone, except for you guys who couldn't fabricate a vacuum chamber if your life depended on it.
Prove me wrong. What is your background, education, experience?
@@kitcanyon658 Explain in detail how Earth's atmosphere can Co exist with the supposed vacuum of space without forcibly being sucked in like in every demonstrable experiment where a vacuum is used?
@@quailshootr6389 : LOL. A flatter! The guys who swallow down a magical dome, a see through moon that is a type of magical light bulb and that claim people in new Zealand can see the sun 6,000 miles further away than Canadians can on the same day.
Get en education, son. It’s embarrassing.
To answer your question forces dictate the movement and form of matter. So where is your force diagram of a volume of air at different altitudes? What’s that? You have zero education in physics or engineering? Gee, go figure.
However, please show us a single sealed container here on earth that has a pressure gradient inside it. We’ll wait.
Unless, of course you didn’t even know that the atmosphere on earth isn’t the same pressure?
Hard fail, son.
@@quailshootr6389 they can't explain anything. They still claim that boats go over the horizon
@@stumpgrinderbear7034 I know. I had a globutard respond with the " you know ship's go below the horizon because you cannot see the bottom of the boat" smh
They had to invent things that had never existed. Build and test two totally unproven Space Crafts. Then train those to pilot them. It's beyond amazing how much they learned doing it. Then America went limp living off the stuff they invented. I don't thing Americans have it in them too do it again.. They have no skilled engineers needed too do it. Much less the blue collar workers to build all them parts..
7½ million pounds of thrust . 2 minutes late 4.5 million pouds of fuel consumed .
😂😂😂
Tom and Jerry
So fake, even at 12:02, the clouds never change. lol
You have no idea how big the Earth and clouds are, do you? lol
@@davidlawrence3106 What does that have to do with the clouds never changing formation?
So how fast do clouds move? 500 mph? 1000 mph?
On a view of more or less our entire globe, you expect to notice movement in a few minutes?
How fast do you think they should move. Strom formations take days to cross my country this is about hours
So fake. At 12:28 how did they get the camera to film all that..?
Seriously...not all of this is real. We know some is fake. It's understood. Not a conspiracy
FYI this is a joke. I'm moking some of the other comments
nasa cerebrate 50 years of shame by never send even one robot go back to apollo landing site 😂
Particularly interesting reading the comments
TBH all im seeing is German rocket technology from the late nineteen 30"s and most certainly no evidence of the shape of this place we call home
So fake!
So fake. And they are doing the identical thing with SpaceX and Artemis now. Showing us rockets and then non stop CGI to fill in the holes.
@@CRYPTICGATE.Official No son. The earth isn't flat. That's cute that you can't do math.
@smeeself You lined up for an experimental EUA vaccine without informed consent. You can't even sue for medical injury. So when it comes to understanding flat earth and how space is fake, you do the same thing. Deflect and cower.
Orbit is a lie, and your precocious vaccine is not safe.
@@kitcanyon658 You can't prove a spinning ball earth. You have to rely on model calculations, unproven theories, and fallacies. Prove me wrong. Give me your best (or several) proof the globe is real.
Dog forget. No fallacies, no assumptions or references to models or theories. Actual observational proof.
@@CRYPTICGATE.Official "Dog forget"? Are you not able to conjure a two word sentence without help? That's classic flatter education there.
Oh, so you claim the earth is flat, do you? Where is your proof? And guess what, being a 7yr old and just crying, "Fake" isn't proof.
Well, since you can't proof it then perhaps you'd be man enough to defend flatter claims. Are you? Are you one just another flatter coward, running away and throwing out insults or emojis to make the other flatter lemmings be impressed by you?
FE claims the sun sets north of due west in December. Anyone with a compass can see it sets south of due west. How come FE can't get that right?
FE claims the sun circles about a flat world between the tropicals latitudes. However, anyone with a brainstem can go out and measure the sun's compass heading and elevation angle and see that the actual motion of the sun can never follow FE claims. How come FE can't get that right? I mean, the solar system and globe model and math gets the sun's position in the sky correct 24/7 and for every point on the planet.
Shouldn't you "men" at FE be able to do at least as good? LOL. Fail.
And finally, please defend the retarded FE claim that people in New Zealand can see the sun almost 7,000 miles further away than Canadians can on the very same day of the year.
What's that? You didn't know FE claimed that with you lame map and model?
Why didn't you know that? I mean, you did actually "research" FE, didn't you?
And as for your question of me, sure, I'll show you proof. Just outline what would be allowed under the flatter bylaws. If you can't outline a predetermined set of parameters of reality then all you'll do is claim fake. Right? I mean, that's all you'll ever have so please detail out acceptance criteria, and I do mean in detail.
At this point it is best if you just insult me and slink away. In order to save face to the lemmings in your FE echo chambers do not, at all costs, ever even consider trying to answer my questions. I wouldn't' want to make you look bad.
Years and years of planning, billions of dollars spent, only to find out that the earth is flat! 🤣
No, just your frontal lobes.
Isn't it ashame that if it weren't for the lost of all that telemetry data that we would be able to travel back to the moon?💁♀️ Isn't it more of ashame that people still accept all nasa's lies as truth?🐑
They didn't lose the telemetry data. Also,that has nothing to do with the lack of manned moon missions over the last few decades. NASA have never been caught lying.
Be harder to trick.
Isn’t a shame that you are fûcked in the head?
@@GuardianSoulkeeper I love it when they trot out that old trope about 'losing the technology' when there are unused rockets on display, engines on display and blueprints freely available!
Yeah, definitely lost it all...
@@serinatang4184 Got a seamstress handy to make some rope memory?
@@GuardianSoulkeeper So?
People still believe in NASA?
*❌✅ 🤣 NOT THE SMART ONES , THAT CAN STILL THINK FOR THEMSELVES 😎👍‼️*
People do. Non-people don't
Imagine recording over your own live apollo footage. Then losing all of your apollo tapes. The same people that trust NASA are the same ones lining up for a EUA vaccine that they can't even sue for. Trust the magic wizard on the TV for life. NO REFUNDS.
@smeeself Sounds like you are pro nasa and pro vaccine.
@Trumpispoop you've achieved nothing. Except weight gain
Fun fact: it never happened.
Awww...❤️ That's so cute and original!😀 You must be super smart and special.
Sure kiddo
Fun fact. You're a career short school bus rider.
all animated hahaha, not a single real footage. Makes you wonder...
You shouldn't have eaten those lead paint chips as a child.
Fake as shake and bake
Heaven is hell compared to hell is paradise.
utter bull crap..... 5000f, titanium melts at 1650c!!!!! no material invented could tolerate that temp especially back in 1967......
The heat shield wasn't made of titanium. It was an ablative shield made from honeycomb and resin. It was designed to "burn away" during reentry.
Why are you dressing as a woman to make comments?
All I want to know is , why do we need 5G networks when all we really need is a landline phone network that President Nixon had in 1969 !!
He was able to phone the moon in real time , NO delays and with NO drop out of reception !!
In 2023 if I go 3hrs away from a major city my mobile reception is shit !!
💁♂️🤷♂️
Did your parents drop you on your head?
@@robertcampbell6349
So , you are a student of the Cognitive Dissonance College then !
When you you can't answer a question with a logical answer you default into ad hominem replies ....
Got it !!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡
@@franknorthcuttmusic
Lol .... 2.6 seconds delay !! 🤣🤣
You noobs believe that whole " official " story !! But yet the technology still can't be replicated en masse in 2023 ??
That's like how the newspapers in the U.S had the photo's of the " landing " within hours so they could print them in the papers the very next day ! Remembering the printing process and lead up to running the actual presses , how was that done ??
The camera man on the moon used their wifi router to send it to Honeysuckle then Houston as well ??
Marvellous how all of this occured in 1969 and up until 3G tech time we in the rest of the world weren't sending anything instantly ..... apart from a fax !!!
Maybe the guy on the moon faxed the photo's back eh !! ...... via that really long cable they installed during the flight !!
😊👍👍
🤣🤣🤣
Bzdura bajka ogólnoświatowa
Hey, do you think it's okay to go ahead and drop this big hot chunk of metal in the ocean.....huh...
Donald You might not like him but he is a about america. And if you can't support that you need to leave or show something more american than him. And if you can't you had better get behind him , why's we still have a country. We are running out of time.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I love that photo of "Trump 2024" flags being made in China. That's how much Trump cares about American workers. So why are all Republicans traitors? Is it just about the money?
This looks primitive. Tesla gave us much more advanced technology. The world would have been a much better place if not for oligarchies suppressed that technology.
baloney
Bollocks.
Well it would do by today's standards 🙄.
Usually when you hear people rambling on about ancient, or suppressed technology, it's from science illiterate idiots, who mistake their overactive imaginations for reality.
Elon Musk/SpaceX is playing 55 years of catch up right now.
Oh god! Yep, those damn oligarchies are always out to get us!
see reality of islam..
stage thurust stage..IN SEA WITH CLAUDS writen GOD name IN ARABIC.ALLAH
ISLAM.MEANS PEACE
ISLAM IS THE RELIGION OF PEACE