Battlefield 1 Soundtrack: Apocalypse alt End of Round theme 1
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 мар 2018
- An alternative end of round theme for Apocalypse, images are taken by me.
All credit goes to DICE, namely Patrik Andrén and Johan Söderqvist who composed the Battlefield Soundtrack. 
Игры
Whenever I play Shock Operations on River Somme, I usually lose, I get pissed because no matter what, unless you're a tank, the Snipers and MGs just mow down all Infantry. Just like what really happened. I get mad but then when the game is over, and this plays, and the announcer says, "We leave this battle with dwindled numbers and spirit, but tomorrow, tomorrow shall be another day." I almost tear up from reality in it. I don't even care that I lost, I just sit there and remember all the great memories I had with this game. I got Battlefield 1 the very day of release (October 21st) in 7th Grade, and instantly, I wanted to learn more and more about WWI. This game got me through the stress of Middle School, and here I am, Junior year in Highschool, still playing, and wishing that the game never came to an end. Lacrimossa (Apocalypse Epilogue Theme), this, The Fields (TSNP), For The Empire (Turning Tides), Going Home (TSAR), Flight of the Pigeon, and Battlefield One, Prologue "We Push" Theme, and Dawn of a New Time all bring great feelings of Nostalgia, and if I wish there was more added to the game, but for now if I could say one things to the makers of Battlefield 1, I'd say thank you for making the greatest war game I've played in my life, and probably will ever play.
I’m a junior too. This game not only helped me get through middle school, but it helped me learn that no matter what countries people fought for, they were all human.
That the German or British you killed in Battlefield reflects the real life soldier who TRULY DIED, they might’ve had families or had someone waiting for them to come home from the terrible war, the conditions they fought in.
And the people at school called history boring.
But hearing Lacrimossa, and realizing that these were real people, and the struggles they fought makes me cry.
The Whole World has almost forgotten them 100 Years Later, if not for Battlefield.
I thought the Germans were bad and Allies are Good. But seeing how human they were, how the Harlem Hellfighter and German Soldier lowered their weapons at the beginning of the game instead of shooting made me see life in a much more different way.
Im happy to see that Im not alone with these feelings. This game perfectly shows the another, the *real* face of this war. The last true war.
The last true war, because there were clean occasions to fight with each other, the last battle of the old empires.
I dont know why people cant understand what a war is, or even care about what happened 100 years ago.
The soldiers fought truly,, with full hearth, and they even cared about , what if they dont make it through, and they didnt had to lose... contrariwise; because they had to lose: *their homeland* ...
In the other hand, every time (so almost every day) when i listen to this Apocalypse musics, I can only imagine Stormtroopers charging on the No Mans Land... And they dont have their mind, and maybe never will have...
Because they are tired, and forgot words like "home" , "family", and when this sounds, they literally lose their mind and do only one thing: charge forward. They a re unstoppable, they are killing their enemies on the *Hell on Earth* .
I dont know that you guys will read this, but Im really happy that there others like me...
Battlefield 1 changed my life, my opinion about Life and about the World...
László Hrabovszky Damn that hit me like a truck just reading it along with the music
I always win in that map, no matter what xd
I’m playing this game in middle school
Imagine if apocalypse dlc had an operation (not a shock operation) and it was about the battle of the Somme, that would be awesome.
The intro and pre battle cry dialogue would need to be dark and horrible.
I think a mega operation of Somme, Verdun, and Brusilov would be an amazing idea.
Closest you can get is that some private operations servers actually has shock operations maps in its rotation, and they are all set to 64 players. The !Shock Operations private server always has 64 player somme operations matches. It gets absolutely insane in the trenches when there are more players. Explosives and gas everywhere. The server is running everyday, so feel free to join it.
@@yuchenchen8012 Which system?
@@keithmcmullen1433 PC
5:11 onwards is so goddamn beautiful, I was laying in the grass looking up at the starry night sky whilst listening to it, nearly teared up a bit
AJ Chronos So true, i was just listening to it in my dark window-lit room and man was this emotional. Also brought some reflective thoughts as well. I can definitely imagine this end theme bringing intense nostalgia in the future years to come, hopefully.
@@YamacKocovali7 It makes me remember October 21st of 2016 like it was yesterday. I had to sell some of my games to get it, but it was probably one of the best decisions of my life.
It's better for a sunset, a break after hell
5:11 : A calming feel after a battle of blood shed, tears, and lead, a sorrow befalls out to those who see their dead. A war fought with millions of lives lost, yes we are free but at what cost? The countless ways soldiers can see death met, is just from 100 years ago lest we forget.
MrOverCritical1989
5:11
Exactly.. the War to End All Wars ended nothing. The sacrifices however weren’t in vain. We still remember them, one hundred years later. The nameless soldiers who died fighting in that terrible war.
History Textbooks only teach about Dates, Numbers of Causalities, and Aftermath of Battles. BUT experiencing the deaths? The Fear, the Anger, the Victories and Defeats are different when you create a game where you could see the humanity in these soldiers, the tragedy and beliefs they held during that time makes you appreciate what happened despite the atrocities. It helps people empathize what these soldiers had to go through.
These soldiers from different sides of the war, helped build the future and still affect us today. Even though the War didn’t end all Wars, I learned from this Great War.
They taught me more about humanity and what life beautifully is. That we are all human and History isn’t boring, it’s only boring because all the little kids read are dates and numbers, but Battlefield helped me recognize that those numbers are real people.
World War 1 and Battlefield 1 really changed my view of life.
You’re right, there was no freedom and today there is only uneasy peace.
But playing as the French, the Germans, the British, the Americans, the Italians, the Ottomans, the Australians made me realize how similar human beings behave.
But instead of learning from these battles, politicians today only care about money. They want war so they have money. All they see are numbers not people.
yeah. I felt the same every time that i finish to play Shock Operations in River Somme. It´s just....
Magnificent.
I even got down on my knees one time.
@@agentsquid9079 the Germans wanted to end the war quick because they knew what war meant from the arms race before the war. they dug in almost as soon as they knew they couldn't take Paris (as to not ignore the sacrifices of their own men), if they won the war their history books would have blamed Belgium for keeping the war from ending quick as result German trenches were leagues over the entaunt's in quality
Serbia fired the first shot when they sponsored the assassination of an archduke France Ferdinand. no apologies nor compensation from Serbia, it was later found that the black hand terrorist group responsible for the assassination received Serbian state funds to do so.
US entered the war for pettily ignoring the British naval blockade breaking the neutrality of the sea doctrine that America entered the war to defend and the ensuing retaliatory U-boat warfare.
also the archduke wanted to give all minorities a greater degree of autonomy, so it was a loss for liberalism and minorities in the kingdom of Austria Hungary was well as the loss of the heir of the kingdom's emperor
no country ever fought a 2 front war. Germany was the first. they considered Russia a bigger threat and they wanted to recreate the strategy they used when they toppled the third French empire in 3 months and prevented that war from 1870 from killing millions. Belgium was in the way of the swift victory to put down France and stop the war from killing any more. since France fortified the border they couldn't do it like they did before. they were both allies in the Napoleonic wars so Germany thought it was a good idea to ask first.
it was the mistake of Britain to enter the war and and defend the strict indebtment against Germany that caused WW2 and an even greater atrocity
the Belgian guarantee of neutrality was a left over from the Napoleonic wars so it was outdated and only contributed to the alliance system mess that the French started when they allied with Russia.
Germany was the least cruel of the colonializers (they had racially integrated colonial militaries in their colonies. that's a surprising accuracy Hollywood got right in the move, "African queen" set in 1914). Belgium was the most cruel even catching threats from the British and French who they themselves weren't much better. it took a German threat of invasion for the Belgians to end their colonial atrocities in the 1890s
historians agree that if Germany won the war that there would have been no debt on intensity as Versailles to cause a second world war with against the entaunt. it also would have stopped the Russian communists from killing a billion within the century as they did through seeding communist regimes all over Asia and the middle east. if Germany won then the holocaust would never have occurred. nor the Holodomor. there would be more independent countries in eastern Europe. and peace would be somewhat preserved in the middle east via the drawing of borders of carving out the ottoman empire not leading to as many violent conflicts among neighbors
we forgot that Nazi Germany did gun control. so did stalin and mao. then these depraved people ordered the killing via collectivization of 100+ million just for kicks, we forgive too easily that destructions of communism upon her people, and despite not forgiving fascism for killing 9 times less, we invite communism back into the fray because of how close it is to socialism. so it was a damn steep cost to warpath and un-democratically draw borders just to keep our measly freedoms that by this decade have eroded due to an un-enlightened mass caring not to learn a darn of history
if the people do not want to learn then why would they want compromise. it's not reconciliation to face constant victory against an opponent who out of virtue abandons their old positions politically. in reality is capitulation out of political correctness. the fascist-communistic idea of political correctness no less. when not faced with threats for speaking one's mind, they will scream to disband their opponent's freedom of speech, but when threatened with the same after disbanding their opposition's they suddenly become advocates for hate speech
they ask for reconciliation and use stats to call their opposition priveledged. yet it was their opposition who made racist policies meant to eliminate that factor. affirmative action as an easy example who would rather prejudicly hire someone based on their rare skin color than their merit of skill that would even remotely happen to be Disproportionately inherit in majority and Semitics alike. it's these same stats by the same government that point out that 10-15 percent of the population commit half the national crime. and that despite making 'less than 5 percent of the population they take up, own most college seats and mega conglomerates. yet it's called racist.
our system is racist without a doubt but it's not as easy as seeing police brutality without being an officer yourself. it's hidden and will throw out lures and red herrings to hide cowardly. and to lure us to do their bidding in deceit. they will destroy integrity if it means their crafted matrix of political correctness doesn't tear itself from it's insides. if we are to fight it then the anti-racists need to take off their redressed biggot glasses. they wanna fight loopholes then they abolish the ones that favor them too. otherwise they have no integrity to concede power like the first president who was also the only independent president in our history\
we get rid of the shit politicians with such a dirty past that they are seen as evil. and we abolish the parties that create these filthy mongerals who make us vote for them out of election rigging. the system is rigged already via loopholes so that only the 2 big meaty parties can get their candidates in with it being so much harder for thirds or even independents to run for any office. that's bureaucracy, Oligarchy, Not True Democracy nor even Republicanism (not the GOP ya partiest twat, the governmental engine we often dubb the Republic that the founding fathers intended America to be)
if we can't even compromise without the need to take it up again a decade later to force ease an agenda than what use is democracy without the ability to compromise concretely, what use is democracy when half the voters don't even know how a gun works nor even handled one for subject area knowledge yet they override the experience's vote. we in our social banter often roast another person about how they don't know much in our subject area yet how can we even gauge this. it's un-scientific and it's just as biggoted
does it look i know about the LQBT+? no so i shouldn't vote on their issues due to having an insufficient grade of the knowledge needed to fully understand what i may vote for out of religous inclinations. i admit this so why shouldn't they admit they don't know so much about guns and overall practicality before they tell me that i can't gracefully defend myself without cutting a attacker up because I'm such shit with a blade
no voting tax but a barrier of knowledge. especially if we seek to adopt a technocracy where our government is advices by the smart. we don't need unworthy people and those who know not much to decide what a scientist across the country can do (science has an ethics code more stable than journalism)
speaking of journalism. they must hire one guy to write all the scripts because it's been confirmed that the entire media uses nearly the same script and same cheap jokes
ruclips.net/video/aGIYU2Xznb4/видео.html
i asked this before scores of months ago and i will ask again. why should we let such a thing control our eyes then it's so tabloid that it took the media to put themselves in such a severe danger that no war law protected them like in vietnam for the media to regain any form of legitimacy to their ethics since WW1. those same videos where the journalist openly hopes that they could get shot for covering what they dare. planned coverages are planned ignorances and planned silences. and these planned silences appease the true opressors who write our racist laws and blames it on whom they want gone with no one pointing at them in skeptisism in fear of political correctness ousting them from country like what the Nazis did to the Jews and the undisirables before they went to just openly shooting them and gassing them in camps where they were rounded up. eventually the people fearing for safety will vote away thier gun rights and vote in concentration camps. the target: thier opposition
first the came for the white men. no one stood up for them. the white wemon said it was fine to reduce mysoginy and that men were unneeded. the league of minorities were fine with it since it attacks racism to the core. the people of the Rainbow flag were fine with it since they traditionally were enemies
then they came for the white wemon and children. the league of minorities though unsettled allowed it because it removes the plowed seeds of further racism. the people of the rainbow flag were fine with it since it removed those they couldn't convince were one of them
then they came for the African men whom produced the finest activists for equality in American history. the African wemon didn't complain since like before, it reduced mysoginy. the people of the rainbow flag despite being unsettled didn't protest for they couldn't turn them to their side either
when it was all said it done they came for the People of the rainbow flag and Semites by blood (who were once of all other demographics spared due to any Jewish ancestry) who wanted to stop this. there was no one else to defend them, the Semites were purged and only remained a new israel, who broke from Judea as a rebellion towards god, first they did come for the US, and now with no opposition they will come for the world, war machine unopposed
yes i use a neimoller poem parody en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came_...
political correctness like fascism strives on eternal war and opponents. and when given a communistic quota to reduce opposition it will stop for no one. not even the makers of the policy who finally reject their madnesses and amoralities. overall my twist of it was weak. but so was the belief that a holocaust was happening until the mass graves were found years later by liberators who honestly were anti-Semitic until they realized what it could turn into or that it could make them monsters
@@collaborisgaming2190 Very enlightening.
I agree that political correctness demands constant opposition.
In history, we see America being manipulated by fear. The reason why America even acts at all is because of fear.
In WW1, the average American agreed to joining the war because of the Zimmerman telegram. (Germany asking Mexico to attack the US)
In WW2, fear of Japanese and Germans taking over the country spurred men into action.
Vietnam War, Fear of Communism.
Post 9/11: Fear of terrorism.
Yet all this fear isn’t helping the country. It’s America’s weakness. Fear.
It causes minorities to fear white people. Police to fear minorities. It causes people to act irrationally.
It causes Left wing and Right wing to paint each other as Antifa and KKK.
Fear alone isn’t what’s making America weak.
It’s our reaction to fear. How we react that depends the fate of the world.
JFK, stopped the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Did he have fear of nuclear war? YES.
But did he let his fear cause him to attack the Russians?
No. He reacted using his logic.
While his generals came up with plans to attack the Russians, he was thinking of settling it peacefully.
What America needs is to learn how to control their fear.
Like what Master Yoda said,
“Fear leds to Anger,” “Anger leds to Hate,” “Hate leads to the dark side.”
The thing is, it’s not bad if you feel fear.
But it’s bad if you let it influence your mind.
What I find damning in this current political age is the amount of fear the media pumps out.
Left Wing “Antifa” this
Right Wing “Racist” that
I know people who are from the left and the right. They are not monsters the media paints.They are Americans too, confused as hell.
If Americans don’t let fear influence their minds, there will be less racism and less tension.
I’m not saying to abandon fear, fear is a survival instinct. But what I’m trying to point out is to not let ourselves be influenced by it.
Because we can be manipulated by fear. Other countries can take advantage of this.
The last part is absolutely beautiful. It perfectly represents a cheery vibe that the soldiers are told they're going home and that the war is over.
Holy shit the last part gives me goosebumps
So fucking epic
5:12 - German Victory
"The most terrible war history has ever seen has been raging in a large part of the world for almost two and a half years. This catastrophe, which the bond of a common millennial civilization has not been able to hold, hits humanity in its most precious achievements. It threatens to shatter the spiritual and material progress that formed the pride of Europe at the beginning of the twentieth century.
Germany and its allies, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria and Turkey, have shown their insurmountable strength in this struggle. They achieved tremendous successes over their opponents, who were superior in number and in war material. Their lines steadfastly withstand the repeated attacks of the armies of their enemies. The recent onslaught in the Balkans has been swiftly and victoriously put down. The last events show that even a further continuation of the war will not be able to break its power of resistance, that rather the whole situation justifies the expectation of further successes. In order to defend their existence and their national freedom of development, the four allied powers were forced to take up arms. The glory deeds of their armies have not changed that either. They have always held to the conviction that their own rights and justified claims do not conflict with the rights of other nations. They do not aim to crush or destroy their opponents. Carried by the awareness of their military and economic strength, and ready to continue the struggle forced upon them to the utmost if necessary, but at the same time inspired by the desire to prevent further bloodshed and to put an end to the atrocities of war,the four allied powers propose to enter into peace negotiations as soon as possible. The proposals that they will bring with them to these negotiations, which are aimed at securing the existence, honor and freedom of development of their peoples, are, in their opinion, a suitable basis for the establishment of a lasting peace.
If, in spite of this offer of peace and reconciliation, the struggle should continue, the four Allied Powers are determined to lead it to a victorious end. But they solemnly reject any responsibility for it before humanity and history."
- Peace Offer of the Central Powers, December 12 1916.
Who offered peace? The central powers or the allies?
@@Ramzi1944 "Peace Offer of the Central Powers, December 12 1916"
@@AFGuidesHD hey thanks for replying, I think the allies should have accepted it
@@Ramzi1944 everyone thinks so. It would have prevented alot of deaths and destruction, could have prevented communism and fascism
@@AFGuidesHD Exactly
vastly superior to the other one imo
I mean this is good, but imo don't think this is superior.
I've been searching around for the other end of round theme, now I've found it, thank you so much man
its a shame that last theme is not included in actual game
Yeah i was pretty dissapointed too. Really hope DICE adds it somehow. I mean, they did add more than one end of round theme for the Turning Tides maps.
Haxor1021 Since Somme is coming to the Operations mode then this might actually be added.
Southie FPS True, heard about the new shock operation coming and i'm really glad i heard this was a possible end theme on one of the cte videos. great stuff :)
Its now on shock operations on the somme
@@Southie wish granted...2 years to late
Imagine you are in the middle of passchendaele and you hear this nightmare music. I mean the map and the real battle of passchendaele both were a nightmare come to life.
I swear I only hear this on Caporetto, I never hear it on the other maps
The Nuclear Emerald I hear it on river Somme
Skavenger 115 the last part ? i never heard it...
I do
Is everyone forgetting passchendaele? Mabey it's because it's a rare map to play on.
@@lossguette1669 You get it on the River Somme shock operations if you lose.
Bruh a gun suicide video appeared when I searched for this
Excuse me WTF?
Yes good soundtrack
It sounds like a dead space 3 music
I felt like Apocalypse end of round theme are really bad compared to the rest of DLC...
Last theme is fucking perfect
darkjack57 yeah they arent intense
I think many people dont realize that the Apocalypes DLC music wasn't supppsed to be intense but more scary.
I was disappointed at first too, but after hearing it in-game a few times it really grew on me. I like how different it is to the others, it's unique.
Every DLC theme represents the current situation
In this case, Horror, Cruelty, Death, Destruction, The end of the war