Porcupine: Taiwan’s Strategic Approach to Survival

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024

Комментарии • 1,8 тыс.

  • @cs0312000
    @cs0312000 Год назад +1045

    I am a Taiwanese army reserve rifleman , since the day Russian invaded Ukraine, I have started training myself.
    Preparing myself makes me feel less anxious, and knowing that if something happened, I will be capable of serving my people and my country.

    • @ZeroResurrected
      @ZeroResurrected Год назад +70

      Stay strong

    • @yuotube.comAlpha
      @yuotube.comAlpha Год назад +110

      I am Ukrainian and I fully sympathize with the people of Taiwan and sincerely wish them peace, but let me wish them only to be brave and unyielding in defending their freedom if necessary! Glory to Ukraine and Glory to Taiwan!

    • @cs0312000
      @cs0312000 Год назад +13

      @@ZeroResurrected Thank you!

    • @chiuananda5573
      @chiuananda5573 Год назад +5

      加油

    • @yuotube.comAlpha
      @yuotube.comAlpha Год назад +3

      @@cs0312000 Thank you!

  • @Bmattsoren
    @Bmattsoren Год назад +364

    I live in Taiwan, if they activate a “foreign legion” I’d join. This is my home away from home and I would 100% fight for my home.

    • @azuremain
      @azuremain Год назад +3

      Who is "they"? You can suggest and initiate one. The Taiwanese government has certainly not thought about it.

    • @Drownedinblood
      @Drownedinblood Год назад

      Very brave for someone who can always leave unlike the locals who would be forced to stay. If I was on the island and a local I'd try to prevent taiwan from becoming Ukraine in the first place. A puppet used for a proxy war that even now doesn't get actual respect or recognition.

    • @dillonhillier
      @dillonhillier Год назад +29

      ​@azuremain it's very obvious who he is talking about when he says "they". See where he says Taiwan, then where the comma is, and then where he says they.

    • @GTFO_0
      @GTFO_0 Год назад

      ​@@dillonhillierWorld knows when america desperately cries for democracy and freedoom of that country or region what will happen to that region take for example afaganostan,iraq,Libiay😂😂😂Even usa has never said taiwan is a country but the amount pf poeple supporting it really is a shock😂😂Bro they are like in civil war that never ended ..Sayinh china is gonna invade taiwan is like asuimg usa will overthrow and overkill hawaians kings and their ruler to setup their Own form of government wheather people want it or not..believe me these Internet CIA paid Trolls and those liking and hypong your Taiwan agenda won't showup when china starts Systematically Detorn that place be careful what you whish for taiwan isn't Ukraine lastly

    • @joshbhoy
      @joshbhoy Год назад +6

      Im moving there in September but to be honest Im not as brave (plus its not my country) Id be on the first raft of evacuations out. I did live in China for 6 years previously and when I was there it was constant talk of invading Taiwan.

  • @robertmarchand1346
    @robertmarchand1346 Год назад +581

    I grew up in Taiwan as a little kid for a few years.
    Navy brat and all.
    It was ruthless in the early 70s when I was a kid living there.
    I got to go back in the late 90s as an adult.
    It was a completely different world.
    Couldn't find where I had lived previously though.
    Absolutely beautiful country.
    Absolutely beautiful people.

    • @masterchinese28
      @masterchinese28 Год назад +18

      I was also there in the late 90's (including during the 9/21 earthquake). It is a gem of a place with friendly people and great service. I sincerely hope that it stays the beautiful, prosperous place that it has become. War would be bad for everyone.

    • @AL-lh2ht
      @AL-lh2ht Год назад

      Yea they were a military junta for decades but in the last couple of decades they have become a real democracy.
      In fact the reason the constitution declared themselves to be the real china was because the leaders were not good people. They were corrupt military in charge, though this has ended a long time ago.

    • @JDMunoz-ct9xn
      @JDMunoz-ct9xn Год назад +3

      Care to expound on "ruthless"?

    • @robertmarchand1346
      @robertmarchand1346 Год назад +12

      @@JDMunoz-ct9xn I saw a man get his hand cut off for stealing something.
      It was just a really

    • @user-ro9zf9kz1h
      @user-ro9zf9kz1h Год назад +21

      @@JDMunoz-ct9xn Lets just say Taiwan was not a democracy back during the cold war.
      If you are curious, google "white terror(taiwan)" or the "228 incident"

  • @Dhdh365
    @Dhdh365 Год назад +100

    Japan won’t stand by idly while Taiwan falls. Their government has even said so, because the fall of Taiwan would mean the sea lanes into Japan could easily be strangled and Japan would essentially collapse.

    • @azuremain
      @azuremain Год назад +15

      The closest island of Japan is only 50 miles away from Taiwan. There is no way without dragging Japan into the war.

    • @andrerothweiler9191
      @andrerothweiler9191 Год назад

      They are all so brave, Ukraine also got all the guarantees after Budapest memorandum

    • @johnmcgill3603
      @johnmcgill3603 Год назад +1

      @@andrerothweiler9191 Try bombing the American base in Okinawa and see what the Japanese will do.

    • @c3sxxzxxz726
      @c3sxxzxxz726 Год назад +1

      ​@@andrerothweiler9191taiwan is not ukraine

    • @Bk6346
      @Bk6346 Год назад

      Japan is collapsing due to only 11.55 percent of its population is under age 14.

  • @ZeroResurrected
    @ZeroResurrected Год назад +2792

    Taiwan is a country

    • @armandoventura9043
      @armandoventura9043 Год назад +46

      @@scroatymcboogerballs8554 not so like that
      Both are nations in their own right, the differences between the two are enough to support that argument.

    • @hklassehutten1476
      @hklassehutten1476 Год назад

      ​@@armandoventura9043 The PROC is a fake proxy, The ROC is the only legitimate China

    • @JamesxKo
      @JamesxKo Год назад +188

      Negative social credit score for you!

    • @bmer92k86
      @bmer92k86 Год назад +1

      ​@@armandoventura9043no they aren't. Roc has been legit government since 1913. The mainland is just in a state of communist rebellion

    • @loganogorman4145
      @loganogorman4145 Год назад +114

      Social credit score, -100.😅

  • @hohoho13
    @hohoho13 Год назад +39

    An interesting note: although the media in English-speaking countries referred to Taiwan's defence strategy as the "porcupine," the actual Chinese term used is that for "hedgehog."

  • @RukhWhitefang
    @RukhWhitefang Год назад +495

    It should be added that there is a global national security interest in helping Taiwan if war breaks out. The fact that Taiwan is the global hub of chip production is a key strategic value. The global economy couldn't function if Taiwan's TSMC was taken over or bombed in a war.

    • @SoundShinobiYuki
      @SoundShinobiYuki Год назад +15

      He brought that up in an older video about the consequences of if Taiwan got invaded.

    • @JDMunoz-ct9xn
      @JDMunoz-ct9xn Год назад +34

      That's why they we're building more semiconductor plants in the US. Besides, China will be petty and destroy Taiwan's plants if it looks like their invasion will fail. We'll be out either way, and the whole world will suffer. Or we'll make ourselves independent of Taiwan, and we won't have such motivation to intervene, which would suck badly for Taiwan.

    • @Lessinath
      @Lessinath Год назад

      @@JDMunoz-ct9xn If China is petty enough to do that, it's time to be petty in return and blockade all trade with China. Including food, that they do not grow enough of. Note that I'm saying *blockade*, not *sanctions*, sanctions are going to happen no matter what.

    • @DauthEldrvaria
      @DauthEldrvaria Год назад

      It’s so sad cause China is already some what of a broken nation. So then destroying the plants that make the chips in Taiwan wouldn’t even big as big of a blow to them as the rest of the world. The Chinese People and Government include suffering in their game plans it seems…

    • @Shoelessjoe78
      @Shoelessjoe78 Год назад +27

      ​@@JDMunoz-ct9xnThere's more then just chips at stake. There's sea lanes and the follow on advances that would be inevitable. Even if the US could get the chip manufacturing up to par it's likely to be involved in the conflict anyway. It would just make a losing effort more palatable.

  • @apollo4619
    @apollo4619 Год назад +43

    99% of US DOD run wargames always have some unrealistic advantages to the opposing force. Reason for this is as one opfor roleplayer at JRTC once said "I hope to give the commanders their worst day here in make believe so they don't have their worst day down range in real life"

    • @christophermichael6027
      @christophermichael6027 Год назад +7

      It’s also to convince Congress to give the DOD more funding to ‘better the odds’.
      If the US wins every time in simulated war games, there will be no need for more funding.

    • @Inari007
      @Inari007 Год назад +5

      The U.S. trains harder then it fights.

    • @codyandrex152
      @codyandrex152 Год назад +1

      Have you heard of millennium challenge 2002?

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip Год назад +5

      The more you sweat in peace, the less you bleed in war. That's why it's called an "exercise".

  • @jaymarkangello600
    @jaymarkangello600 Год назад +146

    Taiwan is a Country support from The Philippines 🇵🇭🤝🇹🇼

    • @6565hopepy
      @6565hopepy Год назад +3

      Philippine is part of Spain 😂

    • @yunuss58
      @yunuss58 Год назад +11

      ​@@6565hopepySpain is a part of Morocco. Also of Rome. And of France

    • @6565hopepy
      @6565hopepy Год назад

      @@yunuss58 France is part of US, US part of Norway 😜

    • @yunuss58
      @yunuss58 Год назад

      @@6565hopepy norway is part of Moosetopia

    • @ridgecrestwack9746
      @ridgecrestwack9746 Год назад

      California is a part of Mexico

  • @DixonLu
    @DixonLu Год назад +18

    If I were a lazy high school teacher, I'd just play Simon's various channels on rotation. The kids probably would get a better education than from the text books they are assigned to.

  • @julianshepherd2038
    @julianshepherd2038 Год назад +80

    Edinburgh, the Scottish capital was captured any time England tried but Scotland was never conquered because mountains (small mountains).

    • @cool06alt
      @cool06alt Год назад +3

      Same with Persia, even if Ctesiphon or the entire Mesopotamia are conquered by Roman, they still exist. Well until Rashidun Caliphate exist at least....

    • @claudiaxander
      @claudiaxander Год назад +6

      Highland Clearances: Don't you, forget about me!
      Don't, don't, don't, don't!

    • @williammccormick64
      @williammccormick64 Год назад +1

      Ireland is very good example.....it took a while...but they won't be back

    • @julianshepherd2038
      @julianshepherd2038 Год назад +3

      ​@@claudiaxanderthat wasn't a foreign power but you be you. It was largely Scottish land owners.

    • @julianshepherd2038
      @julianshepherd2038 Год назад

      ​@@claudiaxanderthat wasn't a foreign power but you be you. It was largely Scottish land owners.

  • @grandlotus1
    @grandlotus1 Год назад +41

    I got to visit Taiwan in 2018 and have been a strong supporter ever since. They are a freedom loving people who have fought to where they are now and will fight to keep their way of life. Taipei is very familiar, in a way - people drive the same cars, wear the same clothes, and - in large part - buy the same products we do. I felt like I was visiting San Antonio, Texas, except everyone was asian.

    • @kainashhsu
      @kainashhsu Год назад +4

      Except the big Ole women ofc

  • @rays3812
    @rays3812 Год назад +33

    I was born in Taiwan, but grew up in the US. Taiwan is a country in my eyes. The US needs to do more to help defend Taiwan's democracy. The free world must stand together, and never yield to dictators and authoritarian regimes like China.

    • @boxingmo911
      @boxingmo911 Год назад

      The PRC is the greatest threat to freedom all over the world. We in the free world must never forget that!!!

    • @spjr99
      @spjr99 Год назад

      We are cuckolded by China

    • @scottwebb4722
      @scottwebb4722 Год назад

      Xi Jinping wishes to know your location for mandatory brainwashing!

  • @tommiefunk2099
    @tommiefunk2099 Год назад +64

    Another Warographics. Another chance for me to sell you guys on why Warographics should cover the Geneva Conventions.

  • @GreySectoid
    @GreySectoid Год назад +17

    Porcupine strategy is what helped Finland to survive cold war as well.

    • @tomviktorsson5052
      @tomviktorsson5052 Год назад

      nope, Finland fought unequal wars smartly intelligently with guerilla tactics . They survived the cold war because they are well experienced in fighting and defeating superior powers, and understand fully well the tremendous cost of war to stay neutral instead of western puppet , war mongers and provocative like Ukraine.

  • @jessejoyce1295
    @jessejoyce1295 Год назад +157

    I’m glad that Taiwan has the support of the US and other countries. Taiwan is a free democracy which preserves traditional Chinese culture and religion, which was wiped out by Mao in China. In terms of per capita wealth and personal freedoms, Taiwan is leagues ahead of China. The vast majority of Taiwanese people don’t want to come under the control of China. Despite the fact that Taiwan has never been under the control of the Communist Party of China, the CCP has said for many decades that they will take Taiwan. Perhaps some day the CCP will try, but looking at the rampant corruption and lack of innovation in the Chinese military, I think it’s little more than a paper tiger. The free world must continue to support Taiwan.

    • @robertduluth8994
      @robertduluth8994 Год назад

      Like we did in Chile? Nicaragua? Batista in Cuba? Fuck the free world all tryrants

    • @chrisblake4198
      @chrisblake4198 Год назад +9

      It's easy to look at the CCP performing maneuvers on land, or the sheer number of troops at their disposal, and be awestruck. However, despite decades of saber rattling and legitimate technical advances, they've done little to convince anyone they're gaining significant competence in the two key aspects that would allow them to invade- sustained precision bombing, and land/sea coastal invasion. If they can't take over the airspace and destroy enough shore defense to land troops and materiel, they'll never achieve the thing they want from a Taiwan invasion. More than just wiping out the government and dominating the populace, if they invade they will want the high end semiconductor manufacturing infrastructure that makes Taiwan so valuable. If they can't invade quickly and thoroughly, they won't be able to capture those advanced facilities and personnel without damage or the Taiwanese themselves initiation self-destruct measures.

    • @AlternativeGeopolitics
      @AlternativeGeopolitics Год назад

      lol you literally dont know wtf you are talking about.

    • @AL-lh2ht
      @AL-lh2ht Год назад +2

      Please don’t say Taiwan is traditional China. That is objectively wrong for so many reasons.

    • @AL-lh2ht
      @AL-lh2ht Год назад

      @@chrisblake4198china wants Taiwan for ideological reasons and not economic. Why do you think they fucked HK?
      No it’s because they would get to declare to the world it’s now the Chinese’s century.

  • @rickh9396
    @rickh9396 Год назад +330

    I always take reported war game results with a huge grain of salt. Anything they release publicly is designed to shape public opinion, not to reflect reality. If someone wants to make US voters nervous in order to increase the political will to raise military spending, this is a great way to do that, regardless of whether the report is accurate.

    • @jaimerodriguez4756
      @jaimerodriguez4756 Год назад +22

      Exactly man no matter how much planning you do there’s no telling what will happen until it happens.

    • @nolongerblocked6210
      @nolongerblocked6210 Год назад +37

      Plus they intentionally act like the opponent does everything perfectly & has the upper hand from the beginning

    • @m.c.martin
      @m.c.martin Год назад +24

      Especially since Russia was number 2 in military and is struggling in Ukraine

    • @rickjames18
      @rickjames18 Год назад +17

      In most cases I would agree but with the CCP issue the US is completely unprepared and in reality more political will is needed to fix the failures of the past 20 years. Military spending at the moment is at the lowest since the cold war ended. A common misconception in the public is that it is higher than ever.

    • @AL-lh2ht
      @AL-lh2ht Год назад +3

      @@nolongerblocked6210and that the US is in a weakened and disadvantaged state.

  • @ridgecrestwack9746
    @ridgecrestwack9746 Год назад +56

    Taiwan is a free and independent country

    • @kjsdpgijn
      @kjsdpgijn Год назад +7

      And West Taiwan is not

    • @calvinblue894
      @calvinblue894 Год назад +1

      UN doesn't recognize that

    • @ridgecrestwack9746
      @ridgecrestwack9746 11 месяцев назад

      @@calvinblue894 good thing everybody listens to and respects the UN right??

    • @calvinblue894
      @calvinblue894 11 месяцев назад

      @@ridgecrestwack9746 AND??? You don't respect..then what??
      Yo ..you are the ANT..Power is REAL..
      They are the authority..you are not..
      Face it!
      And if UN is not the authority..China is the Power..and US have limited means to override that..
      Welcome to LIFE!

  • @TheWayOfAlex
    @TheWayOfAlex Год назад +30

    Very important to distinguish the bases in the Philippines as factually Filipino bases which the U.S. has recently regained significant access to. It's not the same as Japan and Korea where the U.S. has broader powers to use the bases as needed. We are visitors in the Philippines and any action from those bases would have far more political strings attached than in the case in Japan/ROK.

    • @laulaja-7186
      @laulaja-7186 Год назад +3

      That is a much needed clarification, thanks.

    • @johnmcgill3603
      @johnmcgill3603 Год назад

      The Americans have the Philippine President Marcos by the balls. Their family fled to Hawaii during the 1986 revolution. Guess where they placed all their hidden (some say "ill-gotten") wealth, and who controls this wealth. It will be a pity if they lose access to them.

    • @Apollonos
      @Apollonos Год назад

      That may be true, but keep in mind that China has been bullying ALL of its neighbors in Asia for decades, including the Philippines. If China invaded Taiwan, the Philippines might very well conclude they they would be next on China's wish list, and act accordingly.

  • @yuotube.comAlpha
    @yuotube.comAlpha Год назад +53

    I am Ukrainian and I fully sympathize with the people of Taiwan and sincerely wish them peace, but let me wish them only to be brave and unyielding in defending their freedom if necessary! Glory to Ukraine and Glory to Taiwan!

    • @GTFO_0
      @GTFO_0 Год назад

      World knows when america desperately cries for democracy and freedoom of that country or region what will happen to that region take for example afaganostan,iraq,Libiay😂😂😂Even usa has never said taiwan is a country but the amount pf poeple supporting it really is a shock😂😂Bro they are like in civil war that never ended ..Sayinh china is gonna invade taiwan is like asuimg usa will overthrow and overkill hawaians kings and their ruler to setup their Own form of government wheather people want it or not..believe me these Internet CIA paid Trolls and those liking and hypong your Taiwan agenda won't showup when china starts Systematically Detorn that place be careful what you whish for taiwan isn't Ukraine lastly

    • @Graemep2
      @Graemep2 Год назад +2

      slava ukraini!!

  • @hadri_anus
    @hadri_anus Год назад +41

    I think it's important to keep in mind, that one of Chinas goals is to incorporate the taiwanese industry. So even the pessimistic scenario, with heavy urban fighting, could lead to less gains than Putin got at the moment from Ukraine.

    • @--enyo--
      @--enyo-- Год назад +10

      Also dealing with a hostile population/workforce who would be unlikely to cooperate, or do so only grudgingly.

    • @draconightwalker4964
      @draconightwalker4964 Год назад

      the instant china invades, those plants will be rendered inoperative.

    • @winzyl9546
      @winzyl9546 Год назад +9

      Chip manufacturing requires thousands of processes with highly skilled professions and highly advanced technology.
      With chinas wolf warrior policy more and more taiwanese will only be against china and even if china manages to take taiwan, the required highly skilled labor and technology of TSMC or Mediatek will simply not cooperate and migrate their taiwan headquarters and factories to their american offices and factories. Which America would gladly take.

    • @cb3648
      @cb3648 Год назад +4

      @@winzyl9546 Plus whereas Russia has resources it can sell on the black market, China imports a lot of food and energy so sanctions would cripple them.

    • @symbiotezilla12345
      @symbiotezilla12345 Год назад

      @@cb3648
      It’s a dual edged sword. With a crippled china you have a crippled world since just about everything in our day to day life is made in china. It doesn’t seem like world powers will do much to jeopardize that

  • @richbattaglia5350
    @richbattaglia5350 Год назад +29

    THANK YOU!!!!!
    This is exactly what I needed to know the differences between The Ukraine War and a Taiwan invasion.

  • @mmeade9402
    @mmeade9402 Год назад +55

    Feel like this wasn't quite explained correctly. It isn't that the PRC isn't willing to accept those high casualties. It's that they can't sustain the losses in amphibious equipment.
    Even if you get a large number of troops ashore, if you lose too many of the amphibious ships needed to sustain and supply them. It would have done you no good. Those troops will be chewed up eventually as they run out of supplies.

    • @eduwino151
      @eduwino151 Год назад

      Antiship and anti aircraft missiles are cheaper and faster to build than planes and ships , a stockpile of over a thousand antship missiles could erase Chinas naval capacity in a about a week

    • @olderchin1558
      @olderchin1558 Год назад

      This amphibious assault strategy is kind of illogical. This misinformation is spread by US think tanks to placate the Taiwanese population.
      The recent Chinese military exercises makes it clear that China will blockade Taiwan and will attack Taiwan defenses with missiles long before any landing. The PLA has even fired a few salvo of MLRS to demonstrate the ability to do saturated strike of the island's west coast. I doubt Taiwan would much air defence or operating radar after a couple of weeks of bombardment.
      This is not the best scenerio for the PLA, this is certainty when the war starts.
      When the amphibious attack starts, it is likely to be SF first to gain a beachhead follow by air or amphibious tanks.
      When the war starts, it will be Taiwan that will run out of supplies. China manufactures it's own weapons, Taiwan does not. This same experts kept on predicting Russia running out of missiles for a year when Russia has missile manufacturing capacity.

    • @trustandbelieve9173
      @trustandbelieve9173 Год назад +1

      They have 100,000 plus civilian boats for that😅. It will make the Dunkirk operation look like church

    • @eduwino151
      @eduwino151 Год назад +10

      @@trustandbelieve9173 100 civilians can be sunk by even plain old regular atillery , good luck approaching a port with rockets raining down

    • @trustandbelieve9173
      @trustandbelieve9173 Год назад

      @@eduwino151 you think Xi cares about civilian deaths, it will be like canon fodder

  • @anthonyC214
    @anthonyC214 Год назад +22

    The Taiwanese are Not 100 percent Chinese but a fusion of Polyasians, Japanese,and Chinese people so they are unique and should be left alone.

    • @johnmcgill3603
      @johnmcgill3603 Год назад +2

      The Tibetans and Uyghurs are not 100% Chinese, but that didn't stop the CCP.

  • @karunama3771
    @karunama3771 Год назад +127

    Thought some might be interested in why the classified US military war games had a more negative conclusion.
    As a rule, the US military uses war games to find where it needs to improve, so they tend to be intentionally stacked against the US/allied forces.

    • @DauthEldrvaria
      @DauthEldrvaria Год назад

      Well yea, unlike autocratic regimes who make it easier for their armies to win war games by adding handicaps to the otherwise or adding bonuses to their side. America and other western governments don’t like pretending their armies are stronger than they actually are. Especially when you have to project power on a global scale. Just saying, I’m surprised most people wouldn’t put this together.

    • @Erik_Ice_Fang
      @Erik_Ice_Fang Год назад +1

      A rapidly growing Chinese navy ( which outnumbers us with shis), the surprising problem of the US having shorter range missiles with smaller payloads. The fact that the US navy is scattered across the globe but the PLAN isnt. And lets add in the Taiwan is within range of Chinese ground based missiles and special artillery. A very unenviable situation to deal with

    • @ZeroResurrected
      @ZeroResurrected Год назад

      @@Erik_Ice_FangJapan would intervene too

    • @PeterMuskrat6968
      @PeterMuskrat6968 Год назад +11

      @@Erik_Ice_Fangwant to touch on an important point…
      A lot of those PLAN vessels are corvettes, which are wayyyy less useful in an actual engagement and are meant more for patrol and harassment of fishing vessels than actually engaging in combat.
      If we were going for a useful comparison… the Chinese Navy is still way less experienced, way less funded and way less advanced.
      They do have longer range A2A missiles, which is a big problem.
      The US is currently undergoing upwards of 7-9 different Missile programs.
      AIM-260, Peregrine among others… which have double the range of the newest Chinese A2A missiles and a similar payload capacity.
      These are obvious years away still, which is why the US is currently going on a spree of opening up bases in the Philippines, as to be closer to Taiwan.

    • @karunama3771
      @karunama3771 Год назад +3

      @@Erik_Ice_Fang Rapidly growing for sure. Useless corvettes mostly though. Luckily, the PLAN has absolutely no answer to the USN's nuclear submarines. At this point, the PLAN would just be a 'target rich environment'

  • @shiibii6360
    @shiibii6360 Год назад +89

    I would really like to see a warographics episode focusing on the Forest Brothers of post WWII Baltic countries and or an episode focusing on the national guard and grass roots style civil guard units that have sprung up in the Baltics and Poland since 2014. It is really neat seeing the volunteer formations that are willing to buy time for the military to react in the instance of an invasion.

  • @jameswyre6480
    @jameswyre6480 Год назад +26

    Some very good points made here and the team put together a good survey of the wargame results. Some have pointed out omissions like TSMC, but it is a highly complex subject and not all issues can be overviewed in 20 minutes or so. I appreciate the logical approach.

  • @jajssblue
    @jajssblue Год назад +30

    Fantastic analysis and information as usual. I love the work done for this channel. Hats off to the research and creative team!

  • @metamaxis
    @metamaxis 11 месяцев назад +2

    With the way the world is shaking up, I truly hope that this strategy continues to work as a deterrent for the Taiwanese.

  • @Pavlos_Charalambous
    @Pavlos_Charalambous Год назад +34

    A nation that has a similar aproch to Defence is Greece
    Or as a Greek politican said during the 1987 crisis ( in loose translation) " we holding the keys for the mad asylum gate
    ( if you try us) will pass that gate together, dragging you in with us" in other words even if you manage to defeat us,it will be such a pyrrhic victory and the aftermath so chaotic that you really gonna wonder if it worth it in the fist place

    • @freddiemercury2075
      @freddiemercury2075 Год назад +4

      Nobody would attack Greece, unless they willing to face the wrath of Zeus.

  • @ryankline1164
    @ryankline1164 Год назад +48

    Well said. Even under the best scenarios for China you likely have a totally destroyed Taiwan. Does the PRC really think the ROC will allow them to take the chip-centers intact? How many decades will it take to rebuild within a region much harder to subjugate than Tibet or Xinjiang.

    • @JDMunoz-ct9xn
      @JDMunoz-ct9xn Год назад +8

      It would be petty of China to destroy their chip plants, because the whole world, including China would suffer, but I wouldn't put it past them. In any case, that's why the US is intentionally building more manufacturing capacity within our borders. In fact, they're building a massive plant only a short drive from my house.

    • @danielpope6498
      @danielpope6498 Год назад +2

      ​@JDMunoz-ct9xn I have to wonder if China might not assume the loss of manufacturing facilities like TSMC and would actually just be weighing if the west can weather the loss as well as they can. Such a loss would surely hurt china and the west but maybe they believe it would be a worse loss for the west? Perhaps they will wait until their own manufacturing is deemed sufficient to weather such a loss before taking any action.

    • @andersjjensen
      @andersjjensen Год назад

      @@JDMunoz-ct9xn I wouldn't put that past Russia, but China is a different beast. If China can't procure chips from Taiwan or the west they will fall behind in every metric from manufacturing process management to export sales of products. And at the end of the day, unlike Russia, China is driven by profit.

    • @ThisPageIntentionallyLeftBlank
      @ThisPageIntentionallyLeftBlank Год назад +3

      US Army War College Press published a paper in November 2021 - The US has a contingency plan for relocating manufacturing (and talent) after raising the manufacturing facilities if China tries to take them.
      We’ve also been investing in lesser known materials for manufacturing micro chips (e.g. ultra-pure water) to hedge our bets. Basically if China takes TSMC they will have similar control over chip manufacturing the likes of OPECs oil monopoly.

    • @moxinghbian
      @moxinghbian Год назад +5

      The best case scenario is a Democratic unified China. Taiwan doesn't want CCP, doesn't mean Taiwan doesn't want to be THE China.

  • @Mornomgir
    @Mornomgir Год назад +5

    You should do one on the swedish cold war defense against the soviet union. How the idea to shelter 4-5 million people for 4 years underground whilst the world recovred from nuclear annhiliation as well as having the industry tucked away in mountains to be ready to churn out everything everyone needed including old trains and well everything. Not the defense itself which at its peak incorporated half the population and an aritllery piece for each kms of the gigantic border towards the sea. And thats just scratching the surface.

  • @rejvaik00
    @rejvaik00 Год назад +25

    _"To enforce, one must have force"_ - Robert Edwin House
    I applaud Taiwan I hope they can continue and I hope that all they're planning will be enough to dissuade any hostile action from the Chinese mainland
    Let's also look forward to Taiwan becoming an official country in the eyes of the international world sometime this century

    • @erikvan9582
      @erikvan9582 Год назад

      Hopefully the next 20 years

    • @lifesecho4456
      @lifesecho4456 10 месяцев назад

      Most of the interest in China right now comes from economics. If Xi can’t pull his head out of his self-righteous butt about domestic consumption, more countries might find Taiwan a better investment than Beijing.

  • @shengxianhuo7814
    @shengxianhuo7814 Год назад +3

    Amazing content. Thank you. Simon was also incredibly eloquent and engaging.

  • @chuckvelzy6615
    @chuckvelzy6615 Год назад +14

    Simon...I have to say. As your videos continue to get more detailed, you have grown with your many channels and amazing content. I continue to notice delivery, timing and sense of humor regarding such serious topics as amazing. Keep up the amazing work my good sir.

    • @PELEGON1
      @PELEGON1 Год назад

      If only he would speal slower.

  • @nachoolo
    @nachoolo Год назад +6

    After every war game said that Ukraine would only survive for a few days, I'll take any prediction of Taiwan losing in 10 weeks if they were alone with a grain of salt.
    Same with the other heavy loses predictions.

    • @johnmcgill3603
      @johnmcgill3603 Год назад +1

      It is much more complicated if you factor in Chinese culture. Consider that vast majority of Chinese families have only 1 male child (1-child policy) to carry the family name and support the parents into old age, how willing do you think the typical Chinese would want to send their child into a war that doesn't benefit them, but rather likely end their family bloodline? And the CCP isn't quite as popular with the Chinese as it used to be.
      Edit: I forgot to add that some high-ranking individuals of the prized Rocket Force of the Chinese military is secretly working with the Americans, since according to sources, they don't want to be pulverized by the Americans when war starts as they will be the initial main target.

  • @EmilyJelassi
    @EmilyJelassi Год назад +11

    Taiwan is definitely a country and I’m glad it has the support of the U.S., Japan, the Philippines and South Korea!

    • @theawesomeman9821
      @theawesomeman9821 Год назад +1

      it has the support of US and Japan. South Korea and the Philippines have not yet officially supported Taiwan's defense.

    • @angelobandal7112
      @angelobandal7112 Год назад

      ​@@theawesomeman9821They don't recognize our 🇵🇭 victory in the Hague against China. Why would we support them if they support the bullying of the mainland against us?

  • @bioLarzen
    @bioLarzen Год назад +46

    There is an aspect that has not once been mentioned in this video: the state of the Chinese army. One of the many lessons learned from the Ukraine war was how horribly even the most capable military experts and intelligence services can over- or underestimate an army's capabilities, efficiency and power. Everyone and their mothers took it more or less as a fact that the Russian army is still a mighty one that is operated competently. How wrong everybod was... Turned out most of the analyses simply assumed that such a huge army with such a history must, by virute, be a formidable one. Now many analysts have been saying the Chinese army is nowhere near as poweful as the sheer numbers would suggest. But mostly, people still tend to think the Chinese army simply MUST be good and strong because... well, it's the Chinese army. In reality, there are a lot of signs this not being exactly true. Sure, it is, after all, indeed the Chinese army with immense manpower and weaponry, so should they decide to attack, there is no way they wouldn't cause a lot of devastation, no matter what the final outcome is. Just like the Russian army could, can and will be able to cause an awful lot of damage in Ukraine, regardless of the final outcome. But one thing's for sure: we haven't seen the Chinese army in real action for an eternity (thankfully). In spite of an ocean of military, political and aother kinds of intelligence and analysis, we basically have no idea how capable the Chinese army is - just like we had no clue about how capable the Russian army was. We assumed - we were dead wrong. And one interesting aspect: many argue that the biggest factor in the decline of the Russian army probably has been rampant corruption. Well, corruption is just as rampant in China. We don't know how much the army is affected... but corruption has long been a HUGE problem in China.

    • @Keep.It.Simple-23
      @Keep.It.Simple-23 Год назад +7

      There is def something to be said about how Chinas military will actually perform. You can practice and drill all you want but real practical lessons and experience from war, see the United States from at least the Gulf War/Desert Storm on, and that can actually mean something vs pure theory

    • @PeterMuskrat6968
      @PeterMuskrat6968 Год назад +5

      One of the most important and telling things about the PLA/PLAN/PLAAF is that they don’t *TRAIN* the same as the US.
      Flight hours are less than half the US’s, most training is way less in depth than standard US training and the lack of combat experience in this century puts them at a huge disadvantage…
      Chaos rules the battlefield in the best of cases… but if you are Ill prepared that chaos will rule your military too.

    • @tihruytssgjjvsavcxtbvhj3429
      @tihruytssgjjvsavcxtbvhj3429 Год назад +5

      You are dense. Yeah, Russia is powerful, that's why they are inflicting 3 to 1 losses.
      Also, the US has given MORE THAN THE ENTIRE MILITARY BUDGET OF RUSSIA TO UKRAINE.
      So no, Russia isn't struggling against Ukraine, they're struggling against NATO.

    • @zomgbrattodilolrenzor6081
      @zomgbrattodilolrenzor6081 Год назад

      @@tihruytssgjjvsavcxtbvhj3429 "So no, Russia isn't struggling against Ukraine, they're struggling against NATO."
      Wrong. Russia has been struggling against *a fraction* of NATO's budget and surplus military hardware dated from 1980s-2000s. Had it been actual NATO armies Russia faced in a conventional combat, Russia would've been utterly crushed. Those SU-35s they were so proud of would've been falling out of skies as burning wrecks as they're being systematically hunted down by 5th generation fighters.

    • @bioLarzen
      @bioLarzen Год назад +7

      @@tihruytssgjjvsavcxtbvhj3429 Well... looking at the news of the pasr year or so... the Russian army is struggling against itself. They don't even need an enemy.
      (friendly advce: if you start your comment with an insult, nobody will take you seriously.)

  • @bobkelly8644
    @bobkelly8644 Год назад +13

    Two things I keep in mind: 1.) We've seen how the Russian military has been hollowed out by corruption. That's surely happened in China as well and the leadership should know it. 2.) Churchill as Lord of the Admiralty in WWI was very frustrated that offensive action on the seas would be called off due to the loss of one ship with some hundreds of crew, while on the Western Front hundreds of soldiers were lost every day from attrition. The horror of losing large numbers of men to drowning would give anybody pause.

  • @Brownyman
    @Brownyman Год назад +3

    @05:44 “Before it went down” LOL
    You timed that on purpose didn’t you? 😂

  • @tomdefig6514
    @tomdefig6514 Год назад +18

    I do love Simon forecasting a topic and it comes true.

  • @MiM3-3
    @MiM3-3 Год назад +14

    you should make a video on singapore's total defence concept

  • @jayburn00
    @jayburn00 Год назад +34

    Another aspect of Taiwan's strategy is as a poison pill combined with a sort of Samson option. Taiwan has begun producing coventional cruise missiles capable of reaching beijing while also having modified an old but respectably large ww2 era submarine to be a mine layer. Basically, in the event of a Chinese invasion, all those missiles would probably be fired en masse at appropriate targets while the sub could lay mines outside chinese ports. China's economy would be devastated in such a situation, with damage done to its cities while simultanously making maritime shipping hazardous to the point that China would lose even more trade in addition to the trade lost from the international fallout.

    • @frankmueller2781
      @frankmueller2781 Год назад +5

      Taiwan also has a battery of old American 203mm guns on small island positions close to the Chinese shore. These too would fire on Chinese coastal cities opposite Taiwan until destroyed.

    • @c3sxxzxxz726
      @c3sxxzxxz726 Год назад +1

      ​@PapaBAMBI-yb9ehthat is what russia said about ukraine, not every country is the us doing the gulf war mate

    • @Bk6346
      @Bk6346 Год назад

      Fujian province is 3 times the size of Taiwan. Sure Taiwan could launch some missiles at Beijing or Shanghai but China has hundred of cities that would be unscathed. The Chinese retaliation on Taiwan would reduce Taipei to rubble.

    • @jayburn00
      @jayburn00 Год назад +1

      @@Bk6346 you miss the entire point of and how such an attack would be targeted as well.

    • @RayTsou
      @RayTsou Год назад

      @@Bk6346 don't think it'd come to this but taiwan could always lug a few cruise missiles at every single nuclear power plant in china and make things really nasty.

  • @fr2ncm9
    @fr2ncm9 Год назад +7

    I'd love to see an episode on the World War 2 battle of the Hurtgen Forrest. It was the longest single battle the U.S army ever fought(almost 5 months) and one of the bloodiest battles on the western front. Most people have never heard of this battle

    • @HumanityisEmbarrassing
      @HumanityisEmbarrassing Год назад +1

      Would you. Well your desires are important and you matter, so I'm sure they'll get right on that...

    • @fr2ncm9
      @fr2ncm9 Год назад

      @@HumanityisEmbarrassing What's your problem troll? I've seen a lot of people suggest topics in the comments section. Why don't you go crawl back under your rock and stay there.

  • @Ali-bu6lo
    @Ali-bu6lo Год назад +26

    1) I remember the vast majority of simulations and predictions talked of "Ukraine being overran in weeks".
    2) Americans have more than 5000 nukes, China has 300. The number of nukes that are deployed and those that won't malfunction due to neglect are lower but still, the gap is large, I doubt China would risk nuclear war as long as their arsenal is not close in size to that of the US.

    • @armandoventura9043
      @armandoventura9043 Год назад +8

      There is also the fact that Chinese nuclear weapons are more primitive, not up to par with American or Russian ICBMs

    • @annyetapia8221
      @annyetapia8221 Год назад +5

      I can tell you right now. The amount of poorly maintained Nukes in the US arsenal is very very low. The maintenance and budget for these teams is like a bottomless bucket.

    • @robr4662
      @robr4662 Год назад

      I think you underestimate the destructive power of a nuclear icbm, especially multi- warhead varieties. 300 nukes is more than enough to wipe the US off the globe. That being said, if that came to pass, the US has more than enough nukes to do the same to china and any of it's allies. All in all if a war goes nuclear no one wins. Lets hope it never gets to that.

    • @ssglbc1875
      @ssglbc1875 Год назад +3

      Ukraine fully mobilized military is 1.1 million and tawain 2.2 million. But Ukraine troops are much better quality as they had experience in the 2014 Donbas war and do conscription for 12-18 months and they have way more equipment. whereas Taiwan conscripts have 4 months of training but it has a small but modern stockpile. Chinas military is also stronger than Russias. China military 2x the size is a volunteer force and has 4-5x the budget(3x purchasing power parity) both China and tawain can learn a lot from Ukraine war but their biggest factor in the war will be USA. With usa china would loose. Without usa tawain would loose

    • @ssglbc1875
      @ssglbc1875 Год назад +1

      @@annyetapia8221it’s not like they’ll ever be used nukes are more of a I have them so you don’t use them on me or to scare. Like Russias nukes

  • @obi0914
    @obi0914 Год назад +11

    Had a bud who did those kind of analysis back in the day what would be the outcome, he said one word "bloodbath".
    Ask him recently what he thought with modern weaponry, he said "bloodbath now with GPS, Drones and in 4k"

    • @ramonpizarro
      @ramonpizarro Год назад +2

      Lol succinct, I like it
      People forget that this is war, not a game

  • @lachlanp3365
    @lachlanp3365 Год назад +11

    It would be interesting to see if Taiwan adopts some ideas from Ukraine like the cheap ballistic missiles. (While they could/ would be stopped easily 1,000's of them could be used to exhaust air defences on ships)
    I think Ukraine call them the Toskoa.(not sure if they have been used yet)

  • @deltaomega2136
    @deltaomega2136 Год назад +19

    At first this reminded me of the video Simon did 5 months ago about the US invading Iran: While they certainly could the price in blood would be too high to ever try. But then as he continued I realized no, this could potentially be so, so much worse.

    • @Gutbomber
      @Gutbomber Год назад +3

      US would use airforce navy and artillery and I'm sure the Marines would do good . Vietnam Afghanistan Iraq etc were forced into guerrilla warfare. US troops can lethally engage Iranians at 400 meters with their scopes and training. America has a clear technological advantage as well. But Iran looks more organized and prepared than Iraq and Afghanistan. US has 5th generation fighters not sure how Iran would beat all of them.

    • @ssglbc1875
      @ssglbc1875 Год назад +2

      ⁠@@GutbomberVietnam wasn’t forced into guerrilla the us was. China said if the us and south Vietnam invaded the north China would intervene so the us and south couldn’t do anything other than repel attacks and fight guerrillas

    • @pathat8869
      @pathat8869 Год назад +2

      ​@Gutbomber iran would not confront US Air force and US navy directly because they do not have the capability and they are not fools as they know they would be defeated quickly. Iran would fight the US in a non conventional and asymwtric manner. Iran would deploy its troops in mountains,underground and forests to reduce/limit ability of US air force and deploy ground based air defence systems. Iran would also strike US military bases in middle east with drones,missiles to reduce/limit ability of US air force. The US Air force would not be able to operate at its full potential.

    • @Gutbomber
      @Gutbomber Год назад

      @@pathat8869 Iranians happen to have some f15s.. good luck

    • @pathat8869
      @pathat8869 Год назад +1

      @Gutbomber yeah but the US Air force cannot destroy a mountain even with the heaviest bombs. Nuclear weapons would need to be used to cause heavy damage to a mountain or underground facility.

  • @millbean13
    @millbean13 Год назад +5

    As an American I support the full defense of Taiwan. I’m fully aware just how devastating it would be for the US and the world should China get its hands on the TSMC manufacturing plants. I would imagine there is likely a plan to completely destroy the facilities should China make gains in a conflict. And if that were to happen, then what would China even want with the island? TSMC is by far the most valuable asset in Taiwan and with that destroyed, the need for war is completely diminished.

    • @luis-ie3de
      @luis-ie3de Год назад

      the need for war in the eyes of the Chinese government likely lies more with U.S.A's first island chain strategy than on TSMC. We all saw how america dealt when a foreign power attempted to put weapons on a nearby island. But a full blockde of Taiwan would likely be seen as an act of war by china

  • @noahlogue
    @noahlogue Год назад +7

    The US can not abandon Taiwan.

  • @drdavidfoo6632
    @drdavidfoo6632 Год назад +6

    As long as Taiwan is not invaded, the orocuoine strategy is doing its work

  • @EK14MeV
    @EK14MeV Год назад +5

    Simon is so cold from office air conditioning, or basement cool air subsidence, he wears a cable knit sweater in the height of Summer. Lmao
    Can someone store meat in there?

  • @diedertspijkerboer
    @diedertspijkerboer Год назад +19

    Off the bet, I would say that the continued success of Taiwan's strategy will depend on who the invader is. There are certainly leaders who are willing to shed the lives of millions to achieve their goals. If Taiwan ever has to face such a foreign ruler, it could be in serious trouble.

    • @eduwino151
      @eduwino151 Год назад

      unless China develops the capacity to walk on water aint gonna happen , antship missiles are cheaper and faster to build than ampihibious ships , China would lose its entire navy even before getting halfway to Taiwan

    • @mattwalker5689
      @mattwalker5689 Год назад +7

      The problem is that even if the PRC was willing to dump millions men into the meat grinder, they would have problems keeping enough ships intact that could keep supplies and reinforcements flowing.

    • @winzyl9546
      @winzyl9546 Год назад

      The crazier the leader the more coup's he will have, not even Hitler was safe. Especially a direct war against America, it will only be a matter of time before losses are so heavy that either the leadership gives up or the leadership gets coup 'ed.

    • @renanalphiguibane6678
      @renanalphiguibane6678 Год назад

      Amphibious assault is so fragile.. Imagine, 3k chinese soldier on board in every ship going to taiwan and will git hit with 1 anti-ship missile by Taiwan .. China must be ready to dump chinese soldiers on sea

    • @tomviktorsson5052
      @tomviktorsson5052 Год назад

      @@mattwalker5689 or maybe instead of wasting hundreds of millions men , they could just genocide everybody on the islands by bombs and occupy it with a few hundreds millions . And judging by Chinese history , removing tens of millions to hundreds of millions to replace them with other hundreds of millions is not that uncommon practice. China do not play the game of occupying and subjugate others , they play the game of removing and replacing.

  • @masterchinese28
    @masterchinese28 Год назад +7

    To add another layer to the unpredictability of an invasion, typhoon season is May through October. Even in the best-for-China scenario, it would still take months to overtake the island. Random cyclones could seriously complicate amphibious landings in the meantime.
    PRC military planners should have a large "no go" swathe in their calendars.

  • @jim.pearsall
    @jim.pearsall Год назад +25

    Excellent analysis. Thank you. 🙏🏻 Democracies must resist and defeat autocracies. The world order is at stake.

    • @BedroomBully88
      @BedroomBully88 Год назад

      Looks at the EU 👀

    • @TheFlagUnit
      @TheFlagUnit Год назад

      Its a form of governance. GOVERNANCE. Its not a religion, you democracy brainwashed zealot. Its about what system can DELIVER.

  • @ignitionfrn2223
    @ignitionfrn2223 Год назад +11

    1:35 - Chapter 1 - Theory & praxis
    5:50 - Chapter 2 - Stockpiles & capabilities
    10:10 - Chapter 3 - Global support, global lessons
    14:55 - Chapter 4 - War games
    - Chapter 5 -
    - Chapter 6 -
    PS: I do wonder, knowing Russia "track record" against Ukraine...could it be possible China will struggle as well when it will eventually try to conquer Taiwan ?

    • @AncestorEmpire1
      @AncestorEmpire1 Год назад

      China won’t conquer Taiwan through conventional means.
      They will use the west to do it for them.

    • @billfarlo3366
      @billfarlo3366 Год назад +6

      It will be far worse for China just due to geography alone

    • @jeffshackleford3152
      @jeffshackleford3152 Год назад +5

      @@billfarlo3366 heavy casualties while crossing the strait, likely several western submarines attacking, not to mention the landing force having a bad time, also several western allied countries with air bases within 2 hours.

    • @julianshepherd2038
      @julianshepherd2038 Год назад +3

      China has an economy dependent on Western customers.
      They just invest 3 trilling us dollars in the Belt and Road project to ensure that.
      You never know but facts make it tricky.

    • @BackYardScience2000
      @BackYardScience2000 Год назад

      China would collapse if it attacked Taiwan. The sanctions and business being cut off will ruin their economy. If they cut it off, that is. Who knows what the world would really do....

  • @joshuapatrick682
    @joshuapatrick682 6 месяцев назад +1

    I went to high school with a Taiwanese kid named Eddy.... you don't wanna go to war with Taiwan if even 1 out of every 100 of the folks there are like Eddy. You could tell the Overall Defense Concept had been drilled into his very being because sadly, Eddy was the target of bullying. However, he very much took the "mess with me and it's gonna suck for you too" approach to defending himself. Needless to say the bullying attempts didn't last very long

  • @lilchinesekidchen
    @lilchinesekidchen Год назад +3

    honestly I think the US’s policy to containment and their various military bases around taiwan and its surrounding islands is the main deterrence.
    China wouldn’t risk a war with the US and it’s local allies (australia, japan, south korea) just for taiwan.
    Taiwan is more a key piece in the puzzle of US containment rather than the primary military power

    • @laulaja-7186
      @laulaja-7186 Год назад +1

      China’s pretense of focus on Taiwan is pure greed. In actuality they have border disputes with every one of their neighbours, and can only be calculating that a war focused on Taiwan will let them isolate and confront the Americans alone. If only the Americans can be knocked out of the picture, the rest will fall like dominoes including Russia and India. Little do they understand that America has always wanted a strong China, only one with the sanity to function as a leader rather than a bully. This was the thinking behind America’s many decades of reaching out to build trust and economic development in China. But now all the years of one-sided Most Favoured Nation trading status are merely thrown back in America’s face.

  • @giocosoaustralia5286
    @giocosoaustralia5286 Год назад +2

    Whootwhoot Taiwan No.1 #Taiwan #taiwanisacountry #freedompineapple

  • @kiwi_comanche
    @kiwi_comanche Год назад +6

    It should be noted that firearms training, safe handling, weapon maintenance and marksmanship is taught in schools in Taiwan to kids. Behind every blade of grass.

    • @dejectedfrogcat2840
      @dejectedfrogcat2840 Год назад +2

      That was back in the 60's-70's. Now it's just part of the training for compulsory military service.

    • @kiwi_comanche
      @kiwi_comanche Год назад +1

      @@dejectedfrogcat2840 incorrect. Daily life.

    • @q1234635
      @q1234635 11 месяцев назад

      又一個被誇大的說法,事實上只有在高二的時候會有一次在軍方的靶場進行射擊6發子彈的機會,再這之後又回到標準亞洲小孩的升學生活

  • @DaniilVodopian
    @DaniilVodopian Год назад +9

    Would love to see more details on how Taiwan is preparing to defend

    • @jpthomas75
      @jpthomas75 Год назад +2

      I bet China would too

    • @GTFO_0
      @GTFO_0 Год назад

      ​@@jpthomas75World knows when america desperately cries for democracy and freedoom of that country or region what will happen to that region take for example afaganostan,iraq,Libiay😂😂😂Even usa has never said taiwan is a country but the amount pf poeple supporting it really is a shock😂😂Bro they are like in civil war that never ended ..Sayinh china is gonna invade taiwan is like asuimg usa will overthrow and overkill hawaians kings and their ruler to setup their Own form of government wheather people want it or not..believe me these Internet CIA paid Trolls and those liking and hypong your Taiwan agenda won't showup when china starts Systematically Detorn that place be careful what you whish for taiwan isn't Ukraine lastly

    • @q1234635
      @q1234635 11 месяцев назад

      1.擊沈他們的船
      2.防守海岸
      3.等美軍介入🤷

  • @hilairelaplume1616
    @hilairelaplume1616 Год назад +3

    Department of defense plays war games a little differently where they try and make sure they are outgunned outnumbered and I'll played strategy that a lot of Nations do dating back even before the Napoleon wars. The strategy where you can find ways to win o even if you are outgunned and outclassed it's a good strategy keeps everybody humble

  • @Ubique2927
    @Ubique2927 Год назад +1

    The big restriction is the lack of Chinese troop lift and transport capabilities. Either paratroop or Marine lift capability is way short of that required.

  • @James-ep2bx
    @James-ep2bx Год назад +7

    While most definitely both an, 'easier said then done', and imperfect option, the porcupine strategy has been proven effective since prehistory, hence it's animal based name

    • @Kaiserboo1871
      @Kaiserboo1871 8 месяцев назад

      It worked for Switzerland in WWII.

    • @James-ep2bx
      @James-ep2bx 8 месяцев назад

      @@Kaiserboo1871 to be fair they do have a distinct geographic advantage, and it wasn't smooth sailing either

  • @user-me8cy4bn4j
    @user-me8cy4bn4j Год назад +87

    I spent the majority of '90 in Taipei and was taken by the stats stated on the mandatory service periods, as well as the gender differantial. I was told it was 2 years for men and 1 year for women. They take it very seriously and did mauvers through the streets at night moving tanks from base to base. If it comes down to it they will fight like a third monkey on the ramp to Noah's Ark, of that I am certain.

    • @laulaja-7186
      @laulaja-7186 Год назад +19

      “Third monkey” - that is a simian simile I’ve never heard before!

    • @jonnyh6978
      @jonnyh6978 Год назад +13

      @@laulaja-7186 its one of my favorite quotes of all tiime" Don't fight if you can avoid it, but if you do, fight like your the third monkey boarding Noah Ark. And brother, its starting to rain".

    • @sagebiddi
      @sagebiddi Год назад +4

      What in all of the actual fucks?! 🤣😂..I've also never heard this quote before and thank you AND ^^^^^ Mr Jonnnyh ^^^^ above this with the extended version for making a bro privy to this hilaridomness

    • @SuzysRedStripes
      @SuzysRedStripes Год назад +2

      @@jonnyh6978 I can visualize that so well lol

    • @Bk6346
      @Bk6346 Год назад

      Sure they will fight like Ukraine but the island might end up looking like Ukraine.

  • @muthias4582
    @muthias4582 Год назад +8

    Very good analysis but I think you forgotten evaluating one very big important factor I’m sure the Taiwanese are definitely going to bring into their defense.
    The mountains.

    • @elmohead
      @elmohead Год назад +2

      Mountains are basically walls. It can work for or against you.

  • @badgersgetabadname
    @badgersgetabadname Год назад +4

    The psychology of being in that first line of defence must be heavy. You do not expect to survive. You may get wiped out without pulling a trigger. You may never see the enemy but you stand your ground anyway.
    The great lie works in all languages

  • @Direwolf1618
    @Direwolf1618 Год назад +1

    I think one thing that should be addressed is the effect of an American blockade on China, they import something like 80% of their energy and 75% of their food from supply lines that are thousands of miles by sea, with a navy that has a range of about 400 miles... Thats not a good long term proposition if the same kind of sanctions on Russia were applied to China.

  • @anthonybird546
    @anthonybird546 Год назад +3

    You know it's not as terrible a scenario because Simon doesn't get out of his chair at the end.

  • @passivehouseaustralia4406
    @passivehouseaustralia4406 Год назад +1

    You don't need an army that can beat the other on the battlefield... You just need an army that will inflict enough damage to make it not worthwhile the effort or risk...

    • @laulaja-7186
      @laulaja-7186 Год назад +1

      …and you also need an attacker whose calculations are based on honest understanding of costs rather than sclerotic sentiments of honor.

    • @passivehouseaustralia4406
      @passivehouseaustralia4406 Год назад

      @@laulaja-7186 I get where your coming from on that point. If you care about your forces losses, your pretty much ready to go to war with anyone

  • @eggiex6297
    @eggiex6297 Год назад +3

    Taiwan is a beautiful COUNTRY

  • @Stukov961
    @Stukov961 Год назад +1

    This strategy is pretty much what Finland did in the Winter and Continuation Wars. And it's the basis of the defence policy for the Nordics to this day.

  • @ricktow66lcc83
    @ricktow66lcc83 Год назад +3

    Long Live the Nation of Taiwan!

  • @four_20hitman___97
    @four_20hitman___97 Год назад +2

    Whoa. Just watched the previous video about Switzerland and their version of this. Where you left off saying how Taiwan is using their version. You offered a video about it if we were interested. I was literally thinking “man I hope he does that”. Here it is.

  • @wumao6797
    @wumao6797 Год назад +3

    Just curious what kind of soldier can 4 months of military produce? I still remember in the 80s when we had joint exercises with them all their conscripts had over 2 years of military training.

    • @wumao6797
      @wumao6797 Год назад

      @InsaneRabbitDaddyYes, you can have 1000 US marines but with 4 months of training it not really helping, is it? A good example is Ukraine. They send fresh draftees to NATO for 4 months of training did that help?

    • @q1234635
      @q1234635 11 месяцев назад

      同樣的人給美軍訓練4個月可以成為合格士兵,給中華民國陸軍4個月只會得到穿軍服的平民

  • @Barbaroossa
    @Barbaroossa Год назад +1

    I firmly believe that Taiwan already has nuclear weapons. With modern computing technologies, you do not actually have to test a nuclear weapon in order to confirm your design is sound and workable. It's is entirely possible to build a nuclear weapons program based on simulations alone and in this hypothesis I believe that Taiwan intends to use nuclear weapons as weapons of vengeance in the event of a defeat against China.

  • @danielsantiagourtado3430
    @danielsantiagourtado3430 Год назад +3

    Love your videos! Do agincourt next!🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

  • @Corpsman913
    @Corpsman913 Год назад +1

    Worth mentioning: Part of the reason that US and its allies consistently lose during war games is... the OpFor is given EVERY advantage, and the Llies get every realistic atdvantage is stripped away.

  • @sgreen9056
    @sgreen9056 Год назад +4

    Excellent slip at 5:44, very professional 😂

  • @rafaelmartinez1893
    @rafaelmartinez1893 Год назад

    5:44😂😂 bro fell out the back of the vehicle after training

  • @Thamian
    @Thamian Год назад +5

    I keep on seeing these sorts of analyses, and every single one keeps on either omitting or glossing over the reason *why* the world might actually go to war over Taiwan - Semiconductors.
    Last I looked, Taiwan comprised around 75% of all global semiconductor fabrication capacity - add that to the around 7% held by the PRC, and you're looking at the PRC wielding an absolute stranglehold over the components required for just about all advanced technology.
    But this has two devastating consequences - on the one hand, those immense chip foundries directly undermine the porcupine strategy - one predicated on making the loss far worse than the potential gain - unfortunately, those foundries are the sort of collossal prize that might make the cost worth it for PRC to make a play for them. On the other hand, the prospect of that sort of technological domination by the PRC (not to mention all of the potential socio-economic impacts for their own nations' manufacturing bases) makes it incredibly likely that the West and it's Indo-Pacific allies will involve themselves directly.
    Which leads me on to the part of the strategy that I can't believe doesn't exist, but which if it does must be spectacularly highly classified - what does Taiwan do with those foundries if the invasion comes? Do they endeavour to preserve them? Do they start actively putting them to the torch and either evacuating or liquidating the workforce required to build and operate them? Even with the absence of a burn it all down contingency plan, what happens to those foundries just in the general course of the fighting, and what impacts will that have on the world at large?
    I don't have numbers to put to it, but i can tell you for free that the outright loss of 75% of global chip production will deliver a cataclysmic hammer blow to the global economy - even before we look at the panic which will almost certainly rip through the financial markets and the consequences of that, that sort of shortage (and one that would take *years,* maybe *decades* to recover from) will bring production lines for everything from cars, to washing machines, to hand-held power tools to a screeching halt. Never mind what it will do to the internet as servers burn out without replacements in the years before new fabs even go into low rate production.
    Which ultimately is why we *need* the porcupine strategy to work - because if the PRC pulls the trigger anyways, the consequences for the whole world will be savage, even if WW3 doesn't happen, and the nukes stay safely in their silos.

    • @elmohead
      @elmohead Год назад

      TSMC makes 55% of chips, not 75%

    • @Thamian
      @Thamian Год назад

      ​@@elmohead Correct - however, TSMC isn't the only chipmaker in Taiwan - UMC for instance is the second largest contracting chipmaker (i.e. a company that just makes chips for other people rather than designing their own) in the world, and is also a Taiwanese company. Indeed, a quick google search gave me enough different semiconductor companies on the island that someone went to the trouble of compiling a top 10 list, all with revenues in the billions (though some of those don't have any of their own fabs on closer inspection).
      Further research is complicated without an exhaustive search though - the contract chipmakers come to atleast 60% of global market share (Statista puts it at 65% but 60% was the lowest I could see from vaguely reputable sources), but that doesn't include the indigenous manufacturers making chips or other electronics for themselves (for instance, that top 10 included LiteOn - a primarily optoelectronics company), and may not include any non-native semiconductor companies operating their own plants on the island either (for instance, Kioxia bought LiteOn's SSD business a few years ago - haven't confirmed if they still have production lines in Taiwan, but I don't really see why they'd buy the company and just shutter the plants - after all, clean room capacity is both expensive and long winded to build).
      Last time I heard a firm number on their total semiconductor foundry capacity (which was the 75%) was in 2020, so it probably has changed some since then (especially with the new fabs that have been coming online in the PRC in recent years), but north of 70% seems reasonable, especially if Statista's numbers are correct.
      Another interesting point that came out of those quick searches was multiple sources putting around 90% of sub-10nm logic chip production on the island (one day I'm sure Intel will manage to break the 10nm barrier for full-scale production in it's own foundries, but it hasn't yet) - so that's 90% of the chips required for AI, for internet servers, for cryptomining, for graphics rendering, for any and all of the high end processing tasks. Not crucial militarily speaking (not compared to the FPGAs and CPLDs that are also being hammered out in gargantuan quantities on the island), but economically pretty vital, certainly from a future growth perspective.

  • @Jaqenhgar222
    @Jaqenhgar222 Год назад +2

    This "In wargames we lose" tactic is a favorite of the military and defense industry to scare up more money and support for themselves. We keep going for it though, so if it works, they will just keep doing it.

  • @chrisbarr1359
    @chrisbarr1359 Год назад +3

    Your knowledge and ability to communicate is fantastic! Thank you for making these videos.

    • @JDMunoz-ct9xn
      @JDMunoz-ct9xn Год назад +3

      You think Simon knows all this?

    • @Doochos
      @Doochos Год назад +1

      Thank the researchers

  • @rob9368
    @rob9368 Год назад +1

    Ukraine has already shown how scary a country willing to fight can be.

  • @julianshepherd2038
    @julianshepherd2038 Год назад +7

    Makes Kursk look undefended.

  • @yodatrombonist121
    @yodatrombonist121 Год назад +2

    A very good video. One thing you didn’t address (but no criticism that you didn’t) is whether or not the ROK (or even other countries for that matter like the Philippines, India, Vietnam, Singapore, New Zealand, and Australia who’ve all indicated in some way or another that they oppose the PRC) would get involved or if they’d be too preoccupied with a possible North Korean invasion if they were to deploy an expeditionary force

  • @01oo011
    @01oo011 Год назад +4

    Decouple from China!

  • @Dr_Larken
    @Dr_Larken Год назад

    8:37 I'm sorry I just wanted to point out the fact that it looks like Simon murdered the cookie monster & turned him into a sweater!
    Casual, fluffy & comfy!

  • @valkeeree
    @valkeeree Год назад +5

    Since most of these scenarios only take into account military confrontation, it would be interesting to see how China would fare when facing international sanctions to the degree Russia is, can't imagine the PRC would go mano a mano with Taiwan and the US without at least some of the significant nations imposing sanctions.
    considering the amount of resources China needs that it imports and Russias instability making it unlikely to help in fhe amount needed, I can't imagine it would go well

    • @joetheox1202
      @joetheox1202 Год назад

      Russia have done great from the sanctions though, the west sanctioned itself. We couldn't live without all that Chinese plastic rubbish these days.

    • @elmohead
      @elmohead Год назад

      China makes 75% of all medicine in the world. You can't sanction China.

  • @jdougs1117
    @jdougs1117 11 месяцев назад

    Simon, how much existential dread do you experience from the topics across your channels? For me it's quite a bit and yet I keep coming back 🫠

  • @Davef2912
    @Davef2912 Год назад +4

    You mentioned mandatory military service and reservists: a couple of weeks ago I saw a documentary where a young man was interviewed who had done his military service. He said that in his 4 months or so of service he had never even touched a weapon

    • @jezalb2710
      @jezalb2710 Год назад

      And?

    • @q1234635
      @q1234635 11 месяцев назад

      很顯然是誇大的說法,但長期以來台灣軍隊的步兵戰術不符合實戰,甚至沒有越戰美軍的標準

  • @LuisOwnsPomona
    @LuisOwnsPomona Год назад +1

    I’m skeptical about future wars after seeing how Ukraine turned out
    Everyone thought Russia was gonna steamroll but look at them
    That’s over land, can’t imagine how a sea invasion

  • @Ellimanist15
    @Ellimanist15 Год назад +3

    Victory to Ukraine! Strength to Taiwan! Free Hong Kong! Free Tibet!

  • @diedertspijkerboer
    @diedertspijkerboer Год назад +2

    What I don't quite understand is why Taiwan is not putting more focus on long distance anti-ship ant anti-air missiles. Basically, put batteries of these on Taiwan's mainland and aim them at incoming enemy planes and ships.
    These are unmanned, so their cost is just financial for Taiwan.

    • @Ohnothisisbad
      @Ohnothisisbad Год назад

      These systems aren't unmanned though. At least not air defense systems. But I agree they should put almost all of their money into anti air and anti ship missiles. It's their best chance. Also, anti ship mines.

    • @diedertspijkerboer
      @diedertspijkerboer Год назад

      @@Ohnothisisbad I agree, in that sense, the people who man the launching stations are at risk.

    • @johnmcgill3603
      @johnmcgill3603 Год назад

      Taiwan's missiles (that we know of)
      Hsiung Feng II ASCM 100 - 120 km Operational
      Hsiung Feng IIE LACM 600 km Operational
      Hsiung Feng III ASCM 120 - 150 km Operational
      Tien Chi SRBM 120 km Operational
      Wan Chien ALCM 240 km Operational
      Yun Feng LACM 1,200 - 2,000 km In Development (now operational) - this will be used to target Chinese mainland like Beijing and Shanghai, or perhaps, the Three-Gorges dam.

  • @blackwolf-sf1dy
    @blackwolf-sf1dy Год назад +4

    Well if Taiwan developed tactical nukes, wouldn't that make china think twice, three times

    • @augustkk9471
      @augustkk9471 Год назад +2

      They tried in the 80’s US pressured them to stop.

    • @Allen667sjja
      @Allen667sjja Год назад

      The US couldn’t help or encourage that act in any way as if we helped chinas enemies develop nuclear capabilities what motive do the Chinese have to not just do the same to ours?

    • @Allen667sjja
      @Allen667sjja Год назад

      Prob would work tho

    • @95ellington
      @95ellington Год назад +1

      You do that, and suddenly North Korea would have DF 41s, or Cuba, or Venezuela, or Iran. I dont think US want that to happen.

    • @blackwolf-sf1dy
      @blackwolf-sf1dy Год назад

      @95ellington yea looks like it's too late. A historical error for Taiwan. But then again no one lessens to the U.S. lRan, India, and Pakistan built nukes even tho America didn't want them to.

  • @bj7815
    @bj7815 Год назад +2

    Ukraine had the same threat. Russia is seeing that it was better to just not invade

  • @GDTRFB
    @GDTRFB Год назад +6

    I’m pooping whilst listening

  • @sisterfister698
    @sisterfister698 Год назад +1

    To put things in perspective from a strategic military point of view. The entire island of Taiwan is a mountain range on an island. The PRC (CCP) is not well equipped as it is for amphibious assault. They can dominate the seas and skies (except over the mountains because those will be littered with small anti air units) but to TAKE the island they will have to land troops on the island. Even if the PRC had the same naval capabilities as the US Navy in terms of amphibious assault equipment, they would face tremendous losses because to establish a beach head and then try to fight up a mountain almost immediately is a tactical nightmare for any infantryman, its literally a death sentence for the first few hundred thousand that get sent.

  • @chun-yuchen9657
    @chun-yuchen9657 Год назад +2

    The free country of Taiwan and the free world stands against the evil ccp

  • @smoadia85
    @smoadia85 Год назад

    @0:49 brain interprets the shot as "why did simon pull something out from star wars?"