I don't like the design of the "differ". I would think when you have mastered the image cropping, you'll find no reason to play games with image differences. I don't think there is any reason to claim Image Magick is lacking capabilities based on what I see in the video. In my opinion, I don't want a tool that hides an actual image difference. The reason for the image comparison seems lost within your tool's implementation. If you can diff on a partial bitmap, there's no reason to look for an object identifier.
![[Webinar] The evolution of QA at Gojek](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xkOvJjREMYo/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Webinar] The evolution of QA at Gojek](/img/tr.png)
![[Webinar] Automating visual testing with Percy](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/y8XtUlm899w/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Webinar] Manual Testing Bootcamp: Mastering Industry Best Practices](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pmaYwhltH7Q/mqdefault.jpg)
![Visual Testing with Percy: Zero to Hero [Breakpoint 2021]](/img/1.gif)
I don't like the design of the "differ". I would think when you have mastered the image cropping, you'll find no reason to play games with image differences. I don't think there is any reason to claim Image Magick is lacking capabilities based on what I see in the video.
In my opinion, I don't want a tool that hides an actual image difference. The reason for the image comparison seems lost within your tool's implementation. If you can diff on a partial bitmap, there's no reason to look for an object identifier.