Yeah I love the stories from most of the books that he narrates I'm talking about the narrator of this book. But his tone is inflection everything is the same for every single book he reads. I think his voice lends or you know the story lends his voice to voice a story sometimes they go together and it's really nice. Other times not. I've actually had the case where I listen to one of his books a book that this I forget his name the narrator of this book you know a story of an author who I can't remember either at this point but and then heard it again narrated by someone else. And there was a huge difference in the tone of the story The it just changed the whole book the whole story and it changed it for the bed. Because this narrator has this like the e-z-go-lucky careless kind of a narration and when you have some story that's dark or darker The Voice just changes the whole book The narration changes the whole book. And now whenever I hear his voice when I start to listen to a book I'm like oh no not again. I mean when he was doing some of the Murray lines that books you know like the med ship series I guess you can call it the voice was pretty much okay for that you know actually good you know it lent itself to the stories but his voice and his narration style is not always the best for every book I guess you got to take what you can get. Being blind which I am any book that's narrated is a gift in most ways. I've even been able to listen to robotic narration if that's even possible the term is even correct but I guess you can understand what I'm trying to say you know a robotic non-human being reading the story out to you and if the story was strong enough it carried through the story carried over the robots voice. So yeah she just get into the story I guess the narration doesn't matter but a robot has no emotions no style of reading or narrating so it's a little bit easier cuz you can put whatever you want over that. But when you have a person that rating it's hard to put something over that because that person has a it's a person number one LOL and number two puts his own at least in this guy's case his own take well I'm I'm already made my point 10 times over or didn't make my point 10 times over but yeah I'm into verbal diary at this point so I'm going to stop. I'm an addicted commenter and reply! I am trying to stop this. And this is actually a good one I caught myself early which this might seem like a short novel but for my comments that caught it early so stop here Rob sincerely yours, above the blind bedroom guitars
Yea the science inaccuracies in this one were to much for me. even in fiction. Particularly the discussion on light theorem that has been well explored over a hundred years ago
Thanks for sharing this 😊
Chip, thank you so very much for your efforts and skill!
Yeah I love the stories from most of the books that he narrates I'm talking about the narrator of this book. But his tone is inflection everything is the same for every single book he reads. I think his voice lends or you know the story lends his voice to voice a story sometimes they go together and it's really nice. Other times not. I've actually had the case where I listen to one of his books a book that this I forget his name the narrator of this book you know a story of an author who I can't remember either at this point but and then heard it again narrated by someone else. And there was a huge difference in the tone of the story The it just changed the whole book the whole story and it changed it for the bed. Because this narrator has this like the e-z-go-lucky careless kind of a narration and when you have some story that's dark or darker The Voice just changes the whole book The narration changes the whole book. And now whenever I hear his voice when I start to listen to a book I'm like oh no not again. I mean when he was doing some of the Murray lines that books you know like the med ship series I guess you can call it the voice was pretty much okay for that you know actually good you know it lent itself to the stories but his voice and his narration style is not always the best for every book I guess you got to take what you can get. Being blind which I am any book that's narrated is a gift in most ways. I've even been able to listen to robotic narration if that's even possible the term is even correct but I guess you can understand what I'm trying to say you know a robotic non-human being reading the story out to you and if the story was strong enough it carried through the story carried over the robots voice. So yeah she just get into the story I guess the narration doesn't matter but a robot has no emotions no style of reading or narrating so it's a little bit easier cuz you can put whatever you want over that. But when you have a person that rating it's hard to put something over that because that person has a it's a person number one LOL and number two puts his own at least in this guy's case his own take well I'm I'm already made my point 10 times over or didn't make my point 10 times over but yeah I'm into verbal diary at this point so I'm going to stop. I'm an addicted commenter and reply! I am trying to stop this. And this is actually a good one I caught myself early which this might seem like a short novel but for my comments that caught it early so stop here Rob sincerely yours, above the blind bedroom guitars
He is Phil Chenevert ! Bob !
at around 2:29:00, we are gifted with a flawed discussion, of coherent light.
Didn’t John W write the Thing or Who goes there?
Yes he did.
after a couple hours, i am left wondering whether the author used the word beryllium, or bleeryum.
Bleerium is right beside Unobtanium in the periodic chart.
@@blacksheepgargoyle right next to BoredomeCampbellium I think.
Yea the science inaccuracies in this one were to much for me. even in fiction. Particularly the discussion on light theorem that has been well explored over a hundred years ago
You see? I told you that Morse code is not dead!
2024
Campbell was a bit of a pseudoscience kook and a tyrannical editor but is considered to be a great early sci-fi writer.
It is a shame the reader has a speech impediment