Hello wonderful person! I'm taking a short break, spending time with the family. A few of the videos you'll be seeing are older and have never been posted before In this one we'll talk about the visual evidence of a black hole being fed by magnetic fields across the galaxy Happy holidays!
Unfortunately Sofia no longer flies, NASA cut the program for budgetary reasons in 2022 and retired the 747. It's currently on display at the Pima Air Museum in Arizona. It flew out of Nasa's Armstrong Flight Research Center at Plant 42 in Palmdale California. I used to see her on my drive in to work every morning as they were prepping her for another flight, I would consider that my own personal little brush with the cosmos. Cool report Anton.
Well I just learned TWO new things! I didn't know there was such a thing as telescopes on aircraft... and I'd not previously been aware that we could detect magnetic field structures remotely. I just looked up radio polarimetry and was enlightened. Thank you for continuing to provide such interesting stories, and I hope you are enjoying your time with the family, Anton!
Yes, I think it's very possible the galactic magnetic fields play more of a role in shaping and evolving galaxies than we've assumed up to now. Good stuff, as usual.
They literally turn galaxies into what is effectively a solid object moving through a medium. Space is not empty and a galaxy is large AND coherent enough to pick up angular momentum as it falls towards the Attractor. Dark whatever is an illusion and misunderstanding.
😅🤣😂😛LOL. Nonsense... again. It all confirms the Plasma Cosmology [Electric Universe theory 🧲⚡] and hence why conventional astrophysicists are stumped...again. 🙃 When one hears 'magnet-whatever', it has to be immediately translated as 'electric-whatever' because... ... ...[wait for it] ... ... electromagnetic theory. Ever heard of this innocuous yet pesky concept? Didn't think so. We in the Plasma Cosmology community understand the origin and nature of these mag fields. The origins are in the nature of the Birkeland currents/filaments of the Cosmic Web that are just now being discovered. The enormous amount of current fluctuates... hence the variability in the stars and EM signals [light, radio, etc]. The 'nucular' theory can't explain this nor other 'mysteries'. HA! Physicists are on the wrong road... still and will be till hell freezes over because... reputation, ego and funding. Ya, science progresses one funeral at a time. Reg. previous 'unexplained' phenomena: BS counter #1] There is no such thing as magnetic lines!!!!!!!!!!‼ and therefore there is nothing to get 'twisted'!!!!!!!! The 'lines' are but our visual representation of mag fields. STOP USING AS A PHYSICAL PHENOMENON.!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anyone uttering this is just showing their scientific ignorance. 🤡 🎪 BS counter #2] Mag fields can't SNAP!!!!!!!!!!!!‼ That's just more scientific ignorance. Geezus!!!!!!! 💩🚽 BS counter #3] Not that I support the existence of the phenomena which the lamestream science calls black holes, but since light and all EM radiation can't exit the event horizon there can't be any bilateral interaction between the BH and the accretion disc.‼ DONE with this theory/notion propounded by this video. But if there was a interaction that caused the BH to stop instantly it would shred/jettison the accretion disc. Has this ever been observed? NO!!!! Please put this fairy tale to rest. 🤦♂ See my expanded comments in Anton's previous videos. 🎩
They have everything to do with it. Burk land currents, plasma and electromagnetism are what shapes the universe "gravity" almost nothing. Fyi gravity is not what the mainstream scientists think it is. Dark matter... Dark energy lol come on they have to invent things to hold their theory together and still is falling apart
@@chuck6458 Look into variable speed of light cosmology, Dr. Unzicker has many videos going into this topic. The observed redshift that dark energy is inferred from has a natural origin in VSL theories as it ties the energy of the photo to the gravitational potential at its origin location. Anton has tangentially covered this on occasion, referring to this idea as "the tired light hypothesis", but he very much plays it down as it is unconventional to treat c as anything other than a constant. As far as Dark Matter is concerned, my bet is on VSL coupled with misunderstood magnetic interactions of extremely high potential fields.
Yes, it was so beautiful back then, where you could see the images instead of the AI-enhanced dead-eye stare where eyes never leave dead centre of the screen...
I know nearly zero about astrophysics. But as a fields and waves junkie, i wonder if the magnetic fields are really the result of massive flows of charged particles (i.e., current) beginning to circulate around the black hole, resulting in a toroidal magnetic field, which then directs subsequently arriving charged particles into the same inward spiraling trajectory, producing a self-reinforcing toroidal magnetic field. I don’t have a sense for the magnitude of magnetic field so I wonder if the magnetic field is simply a byproduct of the circulation around the black hole -or- if the magnetic field is actually somehow instrumental in creating and maintaining the black hole. If both positive and negative charged particles experience the toroidal magnetic field as they arrive, they would circulate in opposite directions which makes me wonder whether the accretion disc is actually the most powerful particle accelerator in the universe that collides counter-rotating charged beams. Feel free to share your thoughts as i am a casual scientist on this stuff…
I'd say it's in part created by the black hole, in part by the things going around it, so the whole galaxy. It's like light, it feeds on itself to move around. The magnetic plane feeds the electric plane and vice versa.
@ I actually understand what you mean - Electric field coupled to magnetic field so each drives the other leading to wave propagation. Good old differential eqns. 🙂 Thank you.
I wonder if magnetic fields were stronger in the early universe, helping black holes (and stars) to develop quicker and larger than they currently are able to do.
Indeed. With everything being closer together the farther back in cosmological time we go, it makes sense that all the fields and forces were more potent and the reactions happened at insane rates... Creating stars, galaxies, black holes, and everything else at an incredible pace! And then, once an that energy dissipated, we're left with a (fairly) stable universe, with fairly stable building blocks and physics logistics working themselves out.
Wait, based on that diagram and that gravity doesn't directly affect electromagnetism, does that mean whatever matter in the ecretion disk is becoming charged and creating the field that inevitably makes it fall into the black hole faster?
'Magnetism every where in the universe' means current everywhere in the universe, que Electric Universe.... That would get a thank you from Wal Thornehill...Those magnetic lines so indicate current feeding a creative plasmoid rather than a destructive black hole by the way.
The magnetic field animations showing moving arrows seem to imply a magnetic monopole moment in the black hole. That is, if you integrated over a closed volume around the black hole, more lines might point inward than outward, or vice versa. I thought that this was impossible even in a black hole. This would I guess relate to the well-known theorem that a black hole has no hair. Was the diagram wrong or can a black hole have a nonzero magnetic monopole moment?
I assume that the diagram only shows the part of the field lines parallel to the image's plane; surely in reality there would also be lines escaping perpendicular to it.
@@AdenoidHynkelThe2nd , good point. However, I would expect a dominant dipole moment in the field, aligned with the rotation axis of the black hole. I'm just not seeing this here. There's also frame dragging if the black hole is spinning.
It's impossible for us to create one, but it does not mean it's impossible in theory, like if you have lot's of energy concentrated in a really small point like let's say a black hole. I think there are much more of those in reality, we simply don't recognize them as such, but here it's pretty obvious.
During reionization is it possible that a net outward flow of electrons radially along a galactic disk could have caused huge magnetic fields that would then feed the central black hole at tremendous speeds?
I hope so because: 😅🤣😂😛LOL. Nonsense... again. It all confirms the Plasma Cosmology [Electric Universe theory 🧲⚡] and hence why conventional astrophysicists are stumped...again. 🙃 When one hears 'magnet-whatever', it has to be immediately translated as 'electric-whatever' because... ... ...[wait for it] ... ... electromagnetic theory. Ever heard of this innocuous yet pesky concept? Didn't think so. We in the Plasma Cosmology community understand the origin and nature of these mag fields. The origins are in the nature of the Birkeland currents/filaments of the Cosmic Web that are just now being discovered. The enormous amount of current fluctuates... hence the variability in the stars and EM signals [light, radio, etc]. The 'nucular' theory can't explain this nor other 'mysteries'. HA! Physicists are on the wrong road... still and will be till hell freezes over because... reputation, ego and funding. Ya, science progresses one funeral at a time. Reg. previous 'unexplained' phenomena: BS counter #1] There is no such thing as magnetic lines!!!!!!!!!!‼ and therefore there is nothing to get 'twisted'!!!!!!!! The 'lines' are but our visual representation of mag fields. STOP USING AS A PHYSICAL PHENOMENON.!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anyone uttering this is just showing their scientific ignorance. 🤡 🎪 BS counter #2] Mag fields can't SNAP!!!!!!!!!!!!‼ That's just more scientific ignorance. Geezus!!!!!!! 💩🚽 BS counter #3] Not that I support the existence of the phenomena which the lamestream science calls black holes, but since light and all EM radiation can't exit the event horizon there can't be any bilateral interaction between the BH and the accretion disc.‼ DONE with this theory/notion propounded by this video. But if there was a interaction that caused the BH to stop instantly it would shred/jettison the accretion disc. Has this ever been observed? NO!!!! Please put this fairy tale to rest. 🤦♂ See my expanded comments in Anton's previous videos. 🎩 ...
its interesting that magnetic fields can reach out beyond the event horizon. the magnetic field throws protons north and electrons south, neutrons go in the black hole since they are not affected by the magnetic field
I'd be interested in getting an explanation for the abrupt mag lines changes seen in the animation at 6 mins. Also the dense & well-defined 'stream' of lines at the bottom winding in towards the centre from the right side. The defined 'stream' I presume is a vast ion stream but what is guiding it? The discontinuity effects is something else - what might cause such an abrupt change of direction, not just once but at least 2 times? Also, it may be a failure of the imagery but it seems like all those mag lines are trending in to the centre - where is the other 'pole'? If the animation is NOT showing mag lines but instead the regions from which polarised light is coming, why is shown as moving?
@@OneLine122 Possibly you missed the part where that 'ring' is ~5000 light years across? So which relativistic effects would they be & stars in which system? 😁
So the magnetig field looks like the Korean national symbol, but i remember there was also this fringe group talking about the electical universe, also often talking about these magnetig properties. So, might they be more right than commonly considered?
No. The purveyors of the debunked EU hypothesis claim that big stars physically give birth to little stars and planets, and that stars aren't power by nuclear fusion... They claim that gravity and the curvature of space don't exist either, and that it's Birkeland currents that actually control ALL of the processes in the universe, along with numerous other absurd claims made about the field of physics, ad nauseam. It's never been argued that magnetic fields can't or don't play a role in the explanations for some cosmic phenomena. The aurora borealis seen in our atmosphere prove that. HOWEVER, at the end of the day, it's gravity and nuclear fusion that, metaphorically speaking, makes the 'birds sing and the bees hum' in our universe.
@@stargazer5784 not all electric universe proponents believe the same things, just like how not all astrophysicists believe in the same type of dark matter. Stop being so reductive.
Hi Anton, thank for your great video's. For those who are not scared it might be useful to check what Blavatsky wrote about Layapoints in the unverse ( it is not easy to understand all she has been writing unless with an open mind)
The image that Anton shows at 1:25 is unlikely to be a real SOFIA image, and it does not appear as such in the paper that Anton is presenting. The paper describes a scanning procedure by which SOFIA measured the magnetic field at a grid of points spaced much more widely than the pixels in the image. The figures that Anton shows later, composed of an underlying real image with superposed short black straight lines showing the direction of the magnetic field, represent the real measurements. The image at 1:25 is no doubt an artist's impression of what matter streaming along the field could look like, in the artist's imagination. This is the same confusion that happened more recently with the "images" that purport to show the magnetic fields around a supermassive black hole as "observed" by the Event Horizon Telescope, with narrow black lines spiraling into the hole shadow. Those "images", too, were graphical illustrations of what the field lines might be, extrapolating from a much coarser set of measurements of the magnetic field.
@@davejones7632 have you ever studied electromagnetism in college? I have, and there are exactly two sources for magnetic fields: electric currents and time-varying electric fields. Magnetic fields don't just exist, they strictly require sources.
@@nzuckman _"have you ever studied electromagnetism in college? "_ Given that I qualified in plasma physics, what do you think? Lol. And I qualified at a university, not a high school. _"Magnetic fields don't just exist, they strictly require sources."_ Andf I already explained to you about the formation of seed fields, which will have required a current in some place at some time. Nobody thinks galactic magnetic fierlds are the result of extant currents. Nobody.
I don't think magnetism is feeding it. Are we really surprised that magnetic filed follows time space bend by black hole? It's like... How else would you expect this to work? Against of fabric of space and time?
Personally I don’t have any numbers but my intuition says no way could the magnetic fields at any magnitude would be stronger than early universe gravity. So direct collapse still seems most likely to explain SMBH formation
Hm, hm. 😅🤣😂😛LOL. Nonsense... again. It all confirms the Plasma Cosmology [Electric Universe theory 🧲⚡] and hence why conventional astrophysicists are stumped...again. 🙃 When one hears 'magnet-whatever', it has to be immediately translated as 'electric-whatever' because... ... ...[wait for it] ... ... electromagnetic theory. Ever heard of this innocuous yet pesky concept? Didn't think so. We in the Plasma Cosmology community understand the origin and nature of these mag fields. The origins are in the nature of the Birkeland currents/filaments of the Cosmic Web that are just now being discovered. The enormous amount of current fluctuates... hence the variability in the stars and EM signals [light, radio, etc]. The 'nucular' theory can't explain this nor other 'mysteries'. HA! Physicists are on the wrong road... still and will be till hell freezes over because... reputation, ego and funding. Ya, science progresses one funeral at a time. Reg. previous 'unexplained' phenomena: BS counter #1] There is no such thing as magnetic lines!!!!!!!!!!‼ and therefore there is nothing to get 'twisted'!!!!!!!! The 'lines' are but our visual representation of mag fields. STOP USING AS A PHYSICAL PHENOMENON.!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anyone uttering this is just showing their scientific ignorance. 🤡 🎪 BS counter #2] Mag fields can't SNAP!!!!!!!!!!!!‼ That's just more scientific ignorance. Geezus!!!!!!! 💩🚽 BS counter #3] Not that I support the existence of the phenomena which the lamestream science calls black holes, but since light and all EM radiation can't exit the event horizon there can't be any bilateral interaction between the BH and the accretion disc.‼ DONE with this theory/notion propounded by this video. But if there was a interaction that caused the BH to stop instantly it would shred/jettison the accretion disc. Has this ever been observed? NO!!!! Please put this fairy tale to rest. 🤦♂ See my expanded comments in Anton's previous videos. 🎩 ... .. .
bruh, just cause magnetic fields are playing a much larger role than previously thought doesnt mean "electric universe" theory is right. then again a lot of theories have been ignored because they were labeled pseudoscience
@@TheRadischen It kinda does mean that when you look at how MUCH magnetic effects are being shown, how widespread they are & how many different events & structures are redolent with 'magnetic lines'! One wonders how 'magnetic lines' can feed anything & also how do they avoid mentioning the vast streams of electric charges that MUST accompany these ubiquitous 'magnetic lines'...
No, still no credit to EU. The standard model doesn't ignore EM effects, genius. It just doesn't think it's the ONLY effect shaping the universe like you EU nitwits do. You can be slightly right about one thing while still being completely wrong on the big picture.
I respect how a mutant can't just go "all out" all the time due to metabolic expenditure. but besides that, what is stopping Magneto for continually practising his ferro-magnetic abilities all the time, destroying the very blood of mammals that challenge him? besides his morals of course.
I'm genuinely curious what the process of of imaging magnetic lines is. Like how do we process the light data to determine where the magnetic lines are?
No, the magnetic field can bring light charged particles to the black hole, but planets and stars is something totally different. Gravity has there a way stronger pull. It would not have a significant pull/or influence there. As it is to weak.
Pretty sure the answer is no. Not because I've compared the numbers but because it would be pretty strange if all the stars somehow aligned themselves such that they feel an inward magnetic pull at all points in their orbit. I don't know how that would happen and how it could be remotely stable.
😅🤣😂😛LOL. Nonsense... again. It all confirms the Plasma Cosmology [Electric Universe theory 🧲⚡] and hence why conventional astrophysicists are stumped...again. 🙃 When one hears 'magnet-whatever', it has to be immediately translated as 'electric-whatever' because... ... ...[wait for it] ... ... electromagnetic theory. Ever heard of this innocuous yet pesky concept? Didn't think so. We in the Plasma Cosmology community understand the origin and nature of these mag fields. The origins are in the nature of the Birkeland currents/filaments of the Cosmic Web that are just now being discovered. The enormous amount of current fluctuates... hence the variability in the stars and EM signals [light, radio, etc]. The 'nucular' theory can't explain this nor other 'mysteries'. HA! Physicists are on the wrong road... still and will be till hell freezes over because... reputation, ego and funding. Ya, science progresses one funeral at a time. Reg. previous 'unexplained' phenomena: BS counter #1] There is no such thing as magnetic lines!!!!!!!!!!‼ and therefore there is nothing to get 'twisted'!!!!!!!! The 'lines' are but our visual representation of mag fields. STOP USING AS A PHYSICAL PHENOMENON.!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anyone uttering this is just showing their scientific ignorance. 🤡 🎪 BS counter #2] Mag fields can't SNAP!!!!!!!!!!!!‼ That's just more scientific ignorance. Geezus!!!!!!! 💩🚽 BS counter #3] Not that I support the existence of the phenomena which the lamestream science calls black holes, but since light and all EM radiation can't exit the event horizon there can't be any bilateral interaction between the BH and the accretion disc.‼ DONE with this theory/notion propounded by this video. But if there was a interaction that caused the BH to stop instantly it would shred/jettison the accretion disc. Has this ever been observed? NO!!!! Please put this fairy tale to rest. 🤦♂ See my expanded comments in Anton's previous videos. 🎩
It would replace it entirely. I mean black matter IS what hold galaxies together. The more energy is within a system, the more mass it has, so if there is light and plasma moving along those lines, it decreases the amount of dark matter needed. Of course we have no idea how much energy is in there.
@@ericsmith6394 just because it seems weird doesn't mean you should disregard the idea. Stars have a net positive charge of roughly 77 coulombs per solar mass, and the math to show this is actually pretty simple!
Best guess. A heavy mass at the center of the gravity well reset. Angular momentum kept them in a circle at the well limit. Everything closer was pulled in.
According to my physics Gravity, and magnetism are related. Magnetism is gravity scaled down, and pumped through quantum tunnels. So the black hole is probably transforming gravity into magnetism.
In any discussion of Unified Theories, Gravity, Electromagnetism, and the Strong & Weak Nuclear Forces are taken as the four fundamental forces of nature; the first two are part of our everyday, *macroscopic* experiences. It's curious that Electromagnetism has been generally excluded from Cosmology. It makes sense to use *all* of the tools in the toolbox. "Magnetohydrodynamics & Plasma Physics" is discussed in Chapter 10 of Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" (2nd edition). Revisiting the concepts in "Cosmical Electrodynamics" by Alfvén & Fälthammar, and "Physics of the Plasma Universe" by Peratt deserves attention, especially in light of contemporary observations from JWST and other observatories.
@@gravitonthongs1363 you must not have ever taken an introductory astrophysics course because they love to beat the "electromagnetism isn't important" drum in the textbooks they use 🙄
So we know how important of a role Photons/Light plays. We know how important Magnetic fields are around our planets & stars in our solar system. So it's gotta play an important role within Galaxies
Magnetic fields as we know make up the whole universe but it nice to be able to see them in action. The black hole showing the field in great depth. It looks like when it enters the black hole the magnetic field fluctuates as it enters. Very cool looking. What wonders are yet to be found with this new technology Sophia. I don't know if i spelt it right but it's revolutionary. Very cool...{q}
Magnetic fields are caused by electric currents . They not only make stars grow faster they are actually the reason why stars form in the fisrt place, stars doesn't form because of gravitational collapse they form due to the electromagnetic z pinch
_"they form due to the electromagnetic z pinch"_ Not according to anyone familiar with physics. Good luck getting a z-pinch in a molecular cloud, where stars are observed to form. They are composed of cold, neutral gas.
@@davejones7632 the larger the volume of space you're considering, the smaller the ionization fraction you need to get the same plasma effects. Please educate yourself on plasma scaling laws.
@@gravitonthongs1363 how many times do you need to be told that not every EU proponent doesn't think gravity exists? If you can accept that not all astrophysicists believe in the same type of dark matter, I don't understand why this is such a difficult concept for you. 🤦♂️
They were born massive, cause dark matter is just a space disturbance (like a dark energy expansion but in opposite direction to attempt to keep a zero sum). A normal matter just felt into such well. Then the expansion slow down, and dips were relaxed into valleys which now shape galaxies.
It's good to hear that there is evidence that larges scale magnetic fields do play a larger role... Now if 'cold plasmas' can effect spacetime and gravity is more a form of pressure, an artefact of, rather than a Force in it's own right, then I can see Dark Matter being a heck of a lot less than people thought... You'd be looking for what the Zero Point and virtual particles actually consist of... Hypothetical example: That Axions exists below the Zero Point threshold and is why no one can find them... Another hypothetical: That Chimeric particles do not change flavour/shape/type but have more than the typical 3 dimensions and we're only see it's shadow 👀 A hyper-dimensional--particle, an HDP. Making the Zero Point closer to a dimension in it's own right..., and we'd be seeing an interaction? I wonder if that would make it the 90 degrees from the X,Y,Z axis... For things like a hyprecube, as an example😵🤔 Any way, that could also explain is C has greater value than one for things like entanglement change detection over distance, which one experiment (I've heard nothing since, but then no one is talking about such things at present)suggested was closer to an order of magnitude higher. It would neatly tie everything together though 🤗
@@davejones7632 Not striclty speaking EM, it's closely related but only at cold temps. You ahve to get past teh Swing Sving limit or whatever the spelling is. "HOt" does not do that
@@gravitonthongs1363 CalTech has found that magnetism actually plays the overwhelmingly dominant role in accretion disks around supermassive black holes. In the 70s it was assumed that thermal pressure did all the work to support the disk so that they'd be very thin and flat, but a paper published back in March about a new high-resolution cosmological simulation shows that magnetic forces are actually 10,000 times stronger than the thermal pressure for supporting the disks. These magnetic fields puff up accretion disks around supermassive black holes into fluffy donuts with lots of filaments. This strongly contradicts the long-standing assumptions and predictions about the structure of accretion disks. They have a great article about it that you need to read.
U bet! Here is one of my comments: Welcome to the new reality. Seeing how observations under the BigDung hypothesis are wrong or mystified so frequently and EU is ALWAYS correct... logic dictates... Ya, remain irrational and irrelevant. Good luck w that. Riddle me these simple anomalies ---> 😅🤣😂😛LOL. Nonsense... again. It all confirms the Plasma Cosmology [Electric Universe theory 🧲⚡] and hence why conventional astrophysicists are stumped...again. 🙃 When one hears 'magnet-whatever', it has to be immediately translated as 'electric-whatever' because... ... ...[wait for it] ... ... electromagnetic theory. Ever heard of this innocuous yet pesky concept? Didn't think so. We in the Plasma Cosmology community understand the origin and nature of these mag fields. The origins are in the nature of the Birkeland currents/filaments of the Cosmic Web that are just now being discovered. The enormous amount of current fluctuates... hence the variability in the stars and EM signals [light, radio, etc]. The 'nucular' theory can't explain this nor other 'mysteries'. HA! Physicists are on the wrong road... still and will be till hell freezes over because... reputation, ego and funding. Ya, science progresses one funeral at a time. Reg. previous 'unexplained' phenomena: BS counter #1] There is no such thing as magnetic lines!!!!!!!!!!‼ and therefore there is nothing to get 'twisted'!!!!!!!! The 'lines' are but our visual representation of mag fields. STOP USING AS A PHYSICAL PHENOMENON.!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anyone uttering this is just showing their scientific ignorance. 🤡 🎪 BS counter #2] Mag fields can't SNAP!!!!!!!!!!!!‼ That's just more scientific ignorance. Geezus!!!!!!! 💩🚽 BS counter #3] Not that I support the existence of the phenomena which the lamestream science calls black holes, but since light and all EM radiation can't exit the event horizon there can't be any bilateral interaction between the BH and the accretion disc.‼ DONE with this theory/notion propounded by this video. But if there was a interaction that caused the BH to stop instantly it would shred/jettison the accretion disc. Has this ever been observed? NO!!!! Please put this fairy tale to rest. 🤦♂ See my expanded comments in Anton's previous videos. 🎩 ... .. .
Maybe this is the question you're answering, but why is it hard to explain how a black hole grew so quickly in the very center of a galaxy? Seems to idiots like me it just sucks up stuff around it real fast, no? For some reason it is thought it cannot happen that fast, presumably calculating its mass vs the mass of stuff nearby, exactly how near by, other factors, like what? age? etc. One imagines black hole that ate everything near by, there is nothing left, and it is alone. Would it be invisible? Black? Would Hawking radiation be visible?
@BeardedGeezer exactly, you use a filter that alow only the light with a specific polarization to be received, and you know what orientation have the magnetic fields in the emitting medium, or sometimes the traversed ones, (it work in both ways).
I prefer to think of a "Black Hole" as neither Black, nor a Hole; but more "like" a TEMPORAL/GRAVITATIONAL Vortex -- which Science likes to promote as "Spherical"; like Stars, planets, and other "FAMILIAR" Celestial "Particles". Caution: Familiarity breeds contempt but, more often, miscognition. As in Mimetics; i.e.: the relationship between Knowledge and Desire. You know: If words could make wishes come true? 💬** 🐧 **[There is SOMETHING happening there but we don't know what it is. Do we, Mr. Jones?]
If you use your brains, you should have known this a long time ago. Its always been the electric/magnetic force feeding the black holes and Not gravity.
Hello wonderful person!
I'm taking a short break, spending time with the family.
A few of the videos you'll be seeing are older and have never been posted before
In this one we'll talk about the visual evidence of a black hole being fed by magnetic fields across the galaxy
Happy holidays!
Enjoy
Wow, just taking a short break has really taken the time off your face! Thanks Always! 🎄😺🍻
Happy holidays! Wishing you a wonderful new year.
thank you for all your work on this channel. hope your time away gives you everything you wanted.
Season's greetings wonderful Anton ❤
I hope you enjoy your time with your family 🎉
Unfortunately Sofia no longer flies, NASA cut the program for budgetary reasons in 2022 and retired the 747. It's currently on display at the Pima Air Museum in Arizona. It flew out of Nasa's Armstrong Flight Research Center at Plant 42 in Palmdale California. I used to see her on my drive in to work every morning as they were prepping her for another flight, I would consider that my own personal little brush with the cosmos. Cool report Anton.
so when did it take the picture?
2021 damn
Sofia used to fly out of my home town, Christchurch, New Zealand, when surveying southern skies.
You can tell the older videos due to the "offset Anton"... lol
I got cornered, took some time to get out
@@whatdamathCool Video Anton 😊
Real Anton fan right there!😂
what do you mean by offset?
LOL, top tier fan. I can always notice by his hair or the way he talks (but that second one is less accurate).
Hello Anton, have great holidays and a happy new year
Well I just learned TWO new things! I didn't know there was such a thing as telescopes on aircraft... and I'd not previously been aware that we could detect magnetic field structures remotely. I just looked up radio polarimetry and was enlightened. Thank you for continuing to provide such interesting stories, and I hope you are enjoying your time with the family, Anton!
Yes, I think it's very possible the galactic magnetic fields play more of a role in shaping and evolving galaxies than we've assumed up to now. Good stuff, as usual.
Totally. But is it enough to cover the discrepancy? Dark matter and dark energy.. always been skeptical of these concepts.
They literally turn galaxies into what is effectively a solid object moving through a medium. Space is not empty and a galaxy is large AND coherent enough to pick up angular momentum as it falls towards the
Attractor. Dark whatever is an illusion and misunderstanding.
😅🤣😂😛LOL. Nonsense... again. It all confirms the Plasma Cosmology [Electric Universe theory 🧲⚡] and hence why conventional astrophysicists are stumped...again. 🙃 When one hears 'magnet-whatever', it has to be immediately translated as 'electric-whatever' because... ... ...[wait for it] ... ... electromagnetic theory. Ever heard of this innocuous yet pesky concept? Didn't think so. We in the Plasma Cosmology community understand the origin and nature of these mag fields. The origins are in the nature of the Birkeland currents/filaments of the Cosmic Web that are just now being discovered. The enormous amount of current fluctuates... hence the variability in the stars and EM signals [light, radio, etc]. The 'nucular' theory can't explain this nor other 'mysteries'. HA! Physicists are on the wrong road... still and will be till hell freezes over because... reputation, ego and funding. Ya, science progresses one funeral at a time.
Reg. previous 'unexplained' phenomena:
BS counter #1] There is no such thing as magnetic lines!!!!!!!!!!‼ and therefore there is nothing to get 'twisted'!!!!!!!! The 'lines' are but our visual representation of mag fields. STOP USING AS A PHYSICAL PHENOMENON.!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anyone uttering this is just showing their scientific ignorance. 🤡
🎪
BS counter #2] Mag fields can't SNAP!!!!!!!!!!!!‼ That's just more scientific ignorance. Geezus!!!!!!! 💩🚽
BS counter #3] Not that I support the existence of the phenomena which the lamestream science calls black holes, but since light and all EM radiation can't exit the event horizon there can't be any bilateral interaction between the BH and the accretion disc.‼ DONE with this theory/notion propounded by this video. But if there was a interaction that caused the BH to stop instantly it would shred/jettison the accretion disc. Has this ever been observed? NO!!!! Please put this fairy tale to rest. 🤦♂
See my expanded comments in Anton's previous videos. 🎩
They have everything to do with it. Burk land currents, plasma and electromagnetism are what shapes the universe "gravity" almost nothing. Fyi gravity is not what the mainstream scientists think it is. Dark matter... Dark energy lol come on they have to invent things to hold their theory together and still is falling apart
@@chuck6458 Look into variable speed of light cosmology, Dr. Unzicker has many videos going into this topic. The observed redshift that dark energy is inferred from has a natural origin in VSL theories as it ties the energy of the photo to the gravitational potential at its origin location. Anton has tangentially covered this on occasion, referring to this idea as "the tired light hypothesis", but he very much plays it down as it is unconventional to treat c as anything other than a constant. As far as Dark Matter is concerned, my bet is on VSL coupled with misunderstood magnetic interactions of extremely high potential fields.
🤯. Anton, right there on top of the greatest scientific discoveries of our times. Concise, focused.
Vibration insulation for that telescope must have been a bonkers bananas job 🥴
It’s fixed ( was ) by several soft mounted gimbals 👍🤝 very similar in design to the ones used on aircraft for aerial photography
Happy New Year Anton 😊
Yes, it was so beautiful back then, where you could see the images instead of the AI-enhanced dead-eye stare where eyes never leave dead centre of the screen...
Bless you and your family Anton -- and Happy New Year !
R.I.P SOFIA.
You don’t know how many times I have fallen asleep to the sound of your voice Anton.
Same!
Same here, and then I rewatch it in the morning so I see what I missed.
This image of magnetic lines around this black hole is as beautiful to me as our images of the milky way's black hole.
I know nearly zero about astrophysics.
But as a fields and waves junkie, i wonder if the magnetic fields are really the result of massive flows of charged particles (i.e., current) beginning to circulate around the black hole, resulting in a toroidal magnetic field, which then directs subsequently arriving charged particles into the same inward spiraling trajectory, producing a self-reinforcing toroidal magnetic field.
I don’t have a sense for the magnitude of magnetic field so I wonder if the magnetic field is simply a byproduct of the circulation around the black hole -or- if the magnetic field is actually somehow instrumental in creating and maintaining the black hole.
If both positive and negative charged particles experience the toroidal magnetic field as they arrive, they would circulate in opposite directions which makes me wonder whether the accretion disc is actually the most powerful particle accelerator in the universe that collides counter-rotating charged beams.
Feel free to share your thoughts as i am a casual scientist on this stuff…
I'd say it's in part created by the black hole, in part by the things going around it, so the whole galaxy.
It's like light, it feeds on itself to move around. The magnetic plane feeds the electric plane and vice versa.
@ I actually understand what you mean - Electric field coupled to magnetic field so each drives the other leading to wave propagation. Good old differential eqns. 🙂
Thank you.
These Black Holes are mind blowing, there's essentially a Galaxy worth of Matter in a space the size of our Solar System!
Sadly S.O.P.H.I.A. is no longer in use. It was decommissioned in Dec.2022.
It is currently on display at the Pima Air & Space Museum in Arizona.
I wonder if magnetic fields were stronger in the early universe, helping black holes (and stars) to develop quicker and larger than they currently are able to do.
Indeed. With everything being closer together the farther back in cosmological time we go, it makes sense that all the fields and forces were more potent and the reactions happened at insane rates... Creating stars, galaxies, black holes, and everything else at an incredible pace! And then, once an that energy dissipated, we're left with a (fairly) stable universe, with fairly stable building blocks and physics logistics working themselves out.
Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. ✌️☺️
Some galaxies have magnetic personalities. Some don't. Just like people. I don't, but thank you, Anton!
Wait, based on that diagram and that gravity doesn't directly affect electromagnetism, does that mean whatever matter in the ecretion disk is becoming charged and creating the field that inevitably makes it fall into the black hole faster?
Maybe so.
Friction
Love me some magnetic field observations
'Magnetism every where in the universe' means current everywhere in the universe, que Electric Universe.... That would get a thank you from Wal Thornehill...Those magnetic lines so indicate current feeding a creative plasmoid rather than a destructive black hole by the way.
Wal is 6 feet under …thankfully
The magnetic field animations showing moving arrows seem to imply a magnetic monopole moment in the black hole. That is, if you integrated over a closed volume around the black hole, more lines might point inward than outward, or vice versa. I thought that this was impossible even in a black hole. This would I guess relate to the well-known theorem that a black hole has no hair. Was the diagram wrong or can a black hole have a nonzero magnetic monopole moment?
I assume that the diagram only shows the part of the field lines parallel to the image's plane; surely in reality there would also be lines escaping perpendicular to it.
@@AdenoidHynkelThe2nd , good point. However, I would expect a dominant dipole moment in the field, aligned with the rotation axis of the black hole. I'm just not seeing this here. There's also frame dragging if the black hole is spinning.
It's impossible for us to create one, but it does not mean it's impossible in theory, like if you have lot's of energy concentrated in a really small point like let's say a black hole. I think there are much more of those in reality, we simply don't recognize them as such, but here it's pretty obvious.
Love how this shows were almost all connected to the possibly most important and craziest part of our galaxy, really really cool
During reionization is it possible that a net outward flow of electrons radially along a galactic disk could have caused huge magnetic fields that would then feed the central black hole at tremendous speeds?
In a word, no. Quasi-neutrality forbids such a thing.
@@davejones7632 quasi-neutrality in the interstellar medium is an assumption, not a proven fact.
Imagine one day we can track the dynamic magnetic forces in the universe like the animated global wind maps.
I hope so because: 😅🤣😂😛LOL. Nonsense... again. It all confirms the Plasma Cosmology [Electric Universe theory 🧲⚡] and hence why conventional astrophysicists are stumped...again. 🙃 When one hears 'magnet-whatever', it has to be immediately translated as 'electric-whatever' because... ... ...[wait for it] ... ... electromagnetic theory. Ever heard of this innocuous yet pesky concept? Didn't think so. We in the Plasma Cosmology community understand the origin and nature of these mag fields. The origins are in the nature of the Birkeland currents/filaments of the Cosmic Web that are just now being discovered. The enormous amount of current fluctuates... hence the variability in the stars and EM signals [light, radio, etc]. The 'nucular' theory can't explain this nor other 'mysteries'. HA! Physicists are on the wrong road... still and will be till hell freezes over because... reputation, ego and funding. Ya, science progresses one funeral at a time.
Reg. previous 'unexplained' phenomena:
BS counter #1] There is no such thing as magnetic lines!!!!!!!!!!‼ and therefore there is nothing to get 'twisted'!!!!!!!! The 'lines' are but our visual representation of mag fields. STOP USING AS A PHYSICAL PHENOMENON.!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anyone uttering this is just showing their scientific ignorance. 🤡
🎪
BS counter #2] Mag fields can't SNAP!!!!!!!!!!!!‼ That's just more scientific ignorance. Geezus!!!!!!! 💩🚽
BS counter #3] Not that I support the existence of the phenomena which the lamestream science calls black holes, but since light and all EM radiation can't exit the event horizon there can't be any bilateral interaction between the BH and the accretion disc.‼ DONE with this theory/notion propounded by this video. But if there was a interaction that caused the BH to stop instantly it would shred/jettison the accretion disc. Has this ever been observed? NO!!!! Please put this fairy tale to rest. 🤦♂
See my expanded comments in Anton's previous videos. 🎩
...
R.I.P. SOFIA Telescope.
F 😔
It's new to me seeing several jets coming out of a single black hole.
Thank you for showing.
Black hole dynamics are so interesting, but sometimes it seems like we can still learn a lot about them.
Working on it 😂
its interesting that magnetic fields can reach out beyond the event horizon. the magnetic field throws protons north and electrons south, neutrons go in the black hole since they are not affected by the magnetic field
Tack!
Hello Wonderful Anton!!
Magnetic fields? I wonder what would cause that. What causes magnetic fields? Maybe it's a bunch of magnets.
This is a good one Anton!
I'd be interested in getting an explanation for the abrupt mag lines changes seen in the animation at 6 mins. Also the dense & well-defined 'stream' of lines at the bottom winding in towards the centre from the right side.
The defined 'stream' I presume is a vast ion stream but what is guiding it? The discontinuity effects is something else - what might cause such an abrupt change of direction, not just once but at least 2 times?
Also, it may be a failure of the imagery but it seems like all those mag lines are trending in to the centre - where is the other 'pole'? If the animation is NOT showing mag lines but instead the regions from which polarised light is coming, why is shown as moving?
Yeah, it's difficult to imagine a 3 dimensional shape in this 2 dimensional animation, but I think usually they do form a toroidal shaped field.
It's probably relativistic effects that give that impression. Stars in the system probably affect it as well. They are the other poles.
@@OneLine122 Possibly you missed the part where that 'ring' is ~5000 light years across? So which relativistic effects would they be & stars in which system? 😁
So the magnetig field looks like the Korean national symbol, but i remember there was also this fringe group talking about the electical universe, also often talking about these magnetig properties. So, might they be more right than commonly considered?
No. The purveyors of the debunked EU hypothesis claim that big stars physically give birth to little stars and planets, and that stars aren't power by nuclear fusion... They claim that gravity and the curvature of space don't exist either, and that it's Birkeland currents that actually control ALL of the processes in the universe, along with numerous other absurd claims made about the field of physics, ad nauseam. It's never been argued that magnetic fields can't or don't play a role in the explanations for some cosmic phenomena. The aurora borealis seen in our atmosphere prove that. HOWEVER, at the end of the day, it's gravity and nuclear fusion that, metaphorically speaking, makes the 'birds sing and the bees hum' in our universe.
We expect electromagnetic interaction in space.
We don’t have any evidence supporting any EU claims against the standard model yet
@@stargazer5784 not all electric universe proponents believe the same things, just like how not all astrophysicists believe in the same type of dark matter. Stop being so reductive.
Hi Anton, thank for your great video's. For those who are not scared it might be useful to check what Blavatsky wrote about Layapoints in the unverse ( it is not easy to understand all she has been writing unless with an open mind)
Hope your ok... saw that plane crash in south Korea
Happy holidays!
Sofia was shut down some time ago after launch of James Webb. I marvelled at how it maintained its focus on distant objects from the plane.
Just saw the news regarding the South Korean plane crash. I hope you and your friends & family are alright. 💙😔
Does the geometry or shape of these magnetic field lines reflect the curvature of space-time caused by the black hole itself
Thank you
Hello wonderful Anton this is person 😮😅
The image that Anton shows at 1:25 is unlikely to be a real SOFIA image, and it does not appear as such in the paper that Anton is presenting. The paper describes a scanning procedure by which SOFIA measured the magnetic field at a grid of points spaced much more widely than the pixels in the image. The figures that Anton shows later, composed of an underlying real image with superposed short black straight lines showing the direction of the magnetic field, represent the real measurements. The image at 1:25 is no doubt an artist's impression of what matter streaming along the field could look like, in the artist's imagination.
This is the same confusion that happened more recently with the "images" that purport to show the magnetic fields around a supermassive black hole as "observed" by the Event Horizon Telescope, with narrow black lines spiraling into the hole shadow. Those "images", too, were graphical illustrations of what the field lines might be, extrapolating from a much coarser set of measurements of the magnetic field.
Can you do an episode of what space events will happen in 2025
Very interesting in many ways❤👍✈
Must be some large currents involved.
Nope. Only in the black hole jets themselves. The magnetic field already exists.
@@davejones7632 have you ever studied electromagnetism in college? I have, and there are exactly two sources for magnetic fields: electric currents and time-varying electric fields. Magnetic fields don't just exist, they strictly require sources.
@@nzuckman _"have you ever studied electromagnetism in college? "_
Given that I qualified in plasma physics, what do you think? Lol. And I qualified at a university, not a high school.
_"Magnetic fields don't just exist, they strictly require sources."_
Andf I already explained to you about the formation of seed fields, which will have required a current in some place at some time. Nobody thinks galactic magnetic fierlds are the result of extant currents. Nobody.
YOU're wonderful!
The future of astronomy is in outer space. True.
I don't think magnetism is feeding it. Are we really surprised that magnetic filed follows time space bend by black hole? It's like... How else would you expect this to work? Against of fabric of space and time?
Personally I don’t have any numbers but my intuition says no way could the magnetic fields at any magnitude would be stronger than early universe gravity. So direct collapse still seems most likely to explain SMBH formation
I was going to make a monopole joke only to discover it's a quadrupole. The universe is a strange place.
Electric universe mfs have been eating good these days
Hm, hm. 😅🤣😂😛LOL. Nonsense... again. It all confirms the Plasma Cosmology [Electric Universe theory 🧲⚡] and hence why conventional astrophysicists are stumped...again. 🙃 When one hears 'magnet-whatever', it has to be immediately translated as 'electric-whatever' because... ... ...[wait for it] ... ... electromagnetic theory. Ever heard of this innocuous yet pesky concept? Didn't think so. We in the Plasma Cosmology community understand the origin and nature of these mag fields. The origins are in the nature of the Birkeland currents/filaments of the Cosmic Web that are just now being discovered. The enormous amount of current fluctuates... hence the variability in the stars and EM signals [light, radio, etc]. The 'nucular' theory can't explain this nor other 'mysteries'. HA! Physicists are on the wrong road... still and will be till hell freezes over because... reputation, ego and funding. Ya, science progresses one funeral at a time.
Reg. previous 'unexplained' phenomena:
BS counter #1] There is no such thing as magnetic lines!!!!!!!!!!‼ and therefore there is nothing to get 'twisted'!!!!!!!! The 'lines' are but our visual representation of mag fields. STOP USING AS A PHYSICAL PHENOMENON.!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anyone uttering this is just showing their scientific ignorance. 🤡
🎪
BS counter #2] Mag fields can't SNAP!!!!!!!!!!!!‼ That's just more scientific ignorance. Geezus!!!!!!! 💩🚽
BS counter #3] Not that I support the existence of the phenomena which the lamestream science calls black holes, but since light and all EM radiation can't exit the event horizon there can't be any bilateral interaction between the BH and the accretion disc.‼ DONE with this theory/notion propounded by this video. But if there was a interaction that caused the BH to stop instantly it would shred/jettison the accretion disc. Has this ever been observed? NO!!!! Please put this fairy tale to rest. 🤦♂
See my expanded comments in Anton's previous videos. 🎩
...
..
.
Yummy yummy electromagnetism ⚡🧲
Funny how you think any electromagnetic discovery justifies your wild speculation
Electric universe is mythology-based nonsense that has nothing to do with science.
@@gravitonthongs1363 I'm not saying I believe it, I don't
I'm just saying they've been eating good
Let me guess, Anton doesn’t mention Electric Universe.
No. He reports science, not fiction
@ You should sign up for the Roman Catholic Church, they love followers who don’t ask questions.
Electric universe, thank you. A little credit please!!
They will have to admit it very soon
bruh, just cause magnetic fields are playing a much larger role than previously thought doesnt mean "electric universe" theory is right.
then again a lot of theories have been ignored because they were labeled pseudoscience
@@TheRadischen It kinda does mean that when you look at how MUCH magnetic effects are being shown, how widespread they are & how many different events & structures are redolent with 'magnetic lines'!
One wonders how 'magnetic lines' can feed anything & also how do they avoid mentioning the vast streams of electric charges that MUST accompany these ubiquitous 'magnetic lines'...
@@TheRadischenBruh..no magnetic fields without electric current, that's as simple as that
No, still no credit to EU. The standard model doesn't ignore EM effects, genius. It just doesn't think it's the ONLY effect shaping the universe like you EU nitwits do. You can be slightly right about one thing while still being completely wrong on the big picture.
I respect how a mutant can't just go "all out" all the time due to metabolic expenditure. but besides that, what is stopping Magneto for continually practising his ferro-magnetic abilities all the time, destroying the very blood of mammals that challenge him? besides his morals of course.
I'm genuinely curious what the process of of imaging magnetic lines is. Like how do we process the light data to determine where the magnetic lines are?
Polarisation
So, If a magnetiic field coulf hold a galaxy together, would it lessen the amount of black matter guesstimation?
No, the magnetic field can bring light charged particles to the black hole, but planets and stars is something totally different. Gravity has there a way stronger pull. It would not have a significant pull/or influence there. As it is to weak.
Pretty sure the answer is no. Not because I've compared the numbers but because it would be pretty strange if all the stars somehow aligned themselves such that they feel an inward magnetic pull at all points in their orbit. I don't know how that would happen and how it could be remotely stable.
😅🤣😂😛LOL. Nonsense... again. It all confirms the Plasma Cosmology [Electric Universe theory 🧲⚡] and hence why conventional astrophysicists are stumped...again. 🙃 When one hears 'magnet-whatever', it has to be immediately translated as 'electric-whatever' because... ... ...[wait for it] ... ... electromagnetic theory. Ever heard of this innocuous yet pesky concept? Didn't think so. We in the Plasma Cosmology community understand the origin and nature of these mag fields. The origins are in the nature of the Birkeland currents/filaments of the Cosmic Web that are just now being discovered. The enormous amount of current fluctuates... hence the variability in the stars and EM signals [light, radio, etc]. The 'nucular' theory can't explain this nor other 'mysteries'. HA! Physicists are on the wrong road... still and will be till hell freezes over because... reputation, ego and funding. Ya, science progresses one funeral at a time.
Reg. previous 'unexplained' phenomena:
BS counter #1] There is no such thing as magnetic lines!!!!!!!!!!‼ and therefore there is nothing to get 'twisted'!!!!!!!! The 'lines' are but our visual representation of mag fields. STOP USING AS A PHYSICAL PHENOMENON.!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anyone uttering this is just showing their scientific ignorance. 🤡
🎪
BS counter #2] Mag fields can't SNAP!!!!!!!!!!!!‼ That's just more scientific ignorance. Geezus!!!!!!! 💩🚽
BS counter #3] Not that I support the existence of the phenomena which the lamestream science calls black holes, but since light and all EM radiation can't exit the event horizon there can't be any bilateral interaction between the BH and the accretion disc.‼ DONE with this theory/notion propounded by this video. But if there was a interaction that caused the BH to stop instantly it would shred/jettison the accretion disc. Has this ever been observed? NO!!!! Please put this fairy tale to rest. 🤦♂
See my expanded comments in Anton's previous videos. 🎩
It would replace it entirely. I mean black matter IS what hold galaxies together.
The more energy is within a system, the more mass it has, so if there is light and plasma moving along those lines, it decreases the amount of dark matter needed. Of course we have no idea how much energy is in there.
@@ericsmith6394 just because it seems weird doesn't mean you should disregard the idea. Stars have a net positive charge of roughly 77 coulombs per solar mass, and the math to show this is actually pretty simple!
Best guess. A heavy mass at the center of the gravity well reset. Angular momentum kept them in a circle at the well limit. Everything closer was pulled in.
According to my physics Gravity, and magnetism are related. Magnetism is gravity scaled down, and pumped through quantum tunnels. So the black hole is probably transforming gravity into magnetism.
Hopefully a better well theory gets a little more consideration 😊
I didn’t know a black holes diet consisted of magnetic waves. What else does it eat, like for breakfast or for a midnight snack?
Interestingly this may result in a galactic compass. Something that can potentially be traced to always find the center of the galaxy.
Sup Anton
In any discussion of Unified Theories, Gravity, Electromagnetism, and the Strong & Weak Nuclear Forces are taken as the four fundamental forces of nature; the first two are part of our everyday, *macroscopic* experiences. It's curious that Electromagnetism has been generally excluded from Cosmology.
It makes sense to use *all* of the tools in the toolbox.
"Magnetohydrodynamics & Plasma Physics" is discussed in Chapter 10 of Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" (2nd edition). Revisiting the concepts in "Cosmical Electrodynamics" by Alfvén & Fälthammar, and "Physics of the Plasma Universe" by Peratt deserves attention, especially in light of contemporary observations from JWST and other observatories.
It hasn’t been excluded from cosmology, that is just the story you bought into.
Gather current information from reputable sources.
Peratt's stuff was nonsense. And Alfven lost the plot when it came to galaxy formation and even star formation. Nothing to see there.
@@davejones7632 who are you to say that?
@@gravitonthongs1363 you must not have ever taken an introductory astrophysics course because they love to beat the "electromagnetism isn't important" drum in the textbooks they use 🙄
@@nzuckmancite one textbook that quotes your pseudoscientific assertion
Maybe that's the way Black Holes pull mass into itself?
so the analysis concludes that the Black Hole's "event horizon" is also the magnetosphere of the blackhole itself?
A black hole is not what we assume it is.
So we know how important of a role Photons/Light plays. We know how important Magnetic fields are around our planets & stars in our solar system. So it's gotta play an important role within Galaxies
Sofia still operates? I thought it was retired a year or so ago.
That’s awesome
Magnetic fields as we know make up the whole universe but it nice to be able to see them in action. The black hole showing the field in great depth. It looks like when it enters the black hole the magnetic field fluctuates as it enters. Very cool looking. What wonders are yet to be found with this new technology Sophia. I don't know if i spelt it right but it's revolutionary. Very cool...{q}
Magnetic fields are caused by electric currents . They not only make stars grow faster they are actually the reason why stars form in the fisrt place, stars doesn't form because of gravitational collapse they form due to the electromagnetic z pinch
It does prove we live in a electric universe but scientist will never admit.
Pretending gravity doesn’t exist is why nobody takes electric universe seriously
_"they form due to the electromagnetic z pinch"_
Not according to anyone familiar with physics. Good luck getting a z-pinch in a molecular cloud, where stars are observed to form. They are composed of cold, neutral gas.
@@davejones7632 the larger the volume of space you're considering, the smaller the ionization fraction you need to get the same plasma effects. Please educate yourself on plasma scaling laws.
@@gravitonthongs1363 how many times do you need to be told that not every EU proponent doesn't think gravity exists? If you can accept that not all astrophysicists believe in the same type of dark matter, I don't understand why this is such a difficult concept for you. 🤦♂️
🙋🏽♀️ anton everyday
They were born massive, cause dark matter is just a space disturbance (like a dark energy expansion but in opposite direction to attempt to keep a zero sum). A normal matter just felt into such well. Then the expansion slow down, and dips were relaxed into valleys which now shape galaxies.
Is there any evidence that the trajectory of the cosmos may follow magnetic lines that directly feed back into the origin of the universe?
2:23 Antonov?
I hope your holidays have been peaceful
A magnetic monopole ?
It's good to hear that there is evidence that larges scale magnetic fields do play a larger role... Now if 'cold plasmas' can effect spacetime and gravity is more a form of pressure, an artefact of, rather than a Force in it's own right, then I can see Dark Matter being a heck of a lot less than people thought... You'd be looking for what the Zero Point and virtual particles actually consist of...
Hypothetical example: That Axions exists below the Zero Point threshold and is why no one can find them...
Another hypothetical: That Chimeric particles do not change flavour/shape/type but have more than the typical 3 dimensions and we're only see it's shadow 👀 A hyper-dimensional--particle, an HDP.
Making the Zero Point closer to a dimension in it's own right..., and we'd be seeing an interaction? I wonder if that would make it the 90 degrees from the X,Y,Z axis... For things like a hyprecube, as an example😵🤔
Any way, that could also explain is C has greater value than one for things like entanglement change detection over distance, which one experiment (I've heard nothing since, but then no one is talking about such things at present)suggested was closer to an order of magnitude higher. It would neatly tie everything together though 🤗
EM does not explain anything that dark matter does. Been tried decades ago. Doesn't work.
@@davejones7632 Not striclty speaking EM, it's closely related but only at cold temps. You ahve to get past teh Swing Sving limit or whatever the spelling is. "HOt" does not do that
Nice. Science finally admits that magnetism plays a big role in the universe. Now waiting for them to realize that there are no black holes.
It plays a minor role around black holes
@@gravitonthongs1363 CalTech has found that magnetism actually plays the overwhelmingly dominant role in accretion disks around supermassive black holes. In the 70s it was assumed that thermal pressure did all the work to support the disk so that they'd be very thin and flat, but a paper published back in March about a new high-resolution cosmological simulation shows that magnetic forces are actually 10,000 times stronger than the thermal pressure for supporting the disks. These magnetic fields puff up accretion disks around supermassive black holes into fluffy donuts with lots of filaments. This strongly contradicts the long-standing assumptions and predictions about the structure of accretion disks. They have a great article about it that you need to read.
@@nzuckman I said it because I believe it
I think this SMBH have a extreme rotate speed, like magnetars.
Its electric boogie woogie woogie
U bet! Here is one of my comments: Welcome to the new reality. Seeing how observations under the BigDung hypothesis are wrong or mystified so frequently and EU is ALWAYS correct... logic dictates... Ya, remain irrational and irrelevant. Good luck w that. Riddle me these simple anomalies ---> 😅🤣😂😛LOL. Nonsense... again. It all confirms the Plasma Cosmology [Electric Universe theory 🧲⚡] and hence why conventional astrophysicists are stumped...again. 🙃 When one hears 'magnet-whatever', it has to be immediately translated as 'electric-whatever' because... ... ...[wait for it] ... ... electromagnetic theory. Ever heard of this innocuous yet pesky concept? Didn't think so. We in the Plasma Cosmology community understand the origin and nature of these mag fields. The origins are in the nature of the Birkeland currents/filaments of the Cosmic Web that are just now being discovered. The enormous amount of current fluctuates... hence the variability in the stars and EM signals [light, radio, etc]. The 'nucular' theory can't explain this nor other 'mysteries'. HA! Physicists are on the wrong road... still and will be till hell freezes over because... reputation, ego and funding. Ya, science progresses one funeral at a time.
Reg. previous 'unexplained' phenomena:
BS counter #1] There is no such thing as magnetic lines!!!!!!!!!!‼ and therefore there is nothing to get 'twisted'!!!!!!!! The 'lines' are but our visual representation of mag fields. STOP USING AS A PHYSICAL PHENOMENON.!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anyone uttering this is just showing their scientific ignorance. 🤡
🎪
BS counter #2] Mag fields can't SNAP!!!!!!!!!!!!‼ That's just more scientific ignorance. Geezus!!!!!!! 💩🚽
BS counter #3] Not that I support the existence of the phenomena which the lamestream science calls black holes, but since light and all EM radiation can't exit the event horizon there can't be any bilateral interaction between the BH and the accretion disc.‼ DONE with this theory/notion propounded by this video. But if there was a interaction that caused the BH to stop instantly it would shred/jettison the accretion disc. Has this ever been observed? NO!!!! Please put this fairy tale to rest. 🤦♂
See my expanded comments in Anton's previous videos. 🎩
...
..
.
@@nadahere the correlation between EU proponents and hysterical lunatics is definitely not coincidental
So a black hole acts like a mono-pole?
Hello Wonderful Anton.
This is Person.
Unfortunately, Sofia is already retired.
A magnetic field isn't powerful, it's just strong.
So how exactly do black holes feed on magnetic lines.
Sofia is cool. I thought she was retired.
Sofia is history since 2022. RIP
Maybe this is the question you're answering, but why is it hard to explain how a black hole grew so quickly in the very center of a galaxy? Seems to idiots like me it just sucks up stuff around it real fast, no? For some reason it is thought it cannot happen that fast, presumably calculating its mass vs the mass of stuff nearby, exactly how near by, other factors, like what? age? etc. One imagines black hole that ate everything near by, there is nothing left, and it is alone. Would it be invisible? Black? Would Hawking radiation be visible?
Finally the CIA got Anton and they replaced him with a lizard-person to prevent us from learning about the space!
EM Field thermodynamics
those magnetic lines look like a fingerprint ☝️
Thanks Anton! Love the video Evidence of Magnetic Lines Directly Feeding a Massive Black Hole
Looks like two colliding galactic nuclei to me. Jet 4-2 and 3-1.
How do you view magnetic flux lines with an optical telescope?
Changes in polarization of light, only the light with the right type of polarity traverse the ionized medium and is received.
@@theOrionsarms Thanks for the info. So, something like a polarized filter on a camera?
@BeardedGeezer exactly, you use a filter that alow only the light with a specific polarization to be received, and you know what orientation have the magnetic fields in the emitting medium, or sometimes the traversed ones, (it work in both ways).
Cool.
I prefer to think of a "Black Hole" as neither Black, nor a Hole; but more "like" a TEMPORAL/GRAVITATIONAL Vortex -- which Science likes to promote as "Spherical"; like Stars, planets, and other "FAMILIAR" Celestial "Particles".
Caution: Familiarity breeds contempt but, more often, miscognition. As in Mimetics; i.e.: the relationship between Knowledge and Desire. You know: If words could make wishes come true?
💬**
🐧
**[There is SOMETHING happening there but we don't know what it is. Do we, Mr. Jones?]
If you use your brains, you should have known this a long time ago. Its always been the electric/magnetic force feeding the black holes and Not gravity.
By “use your brains” you mean not use your brains?