NEW! MiniArt Puma Sd.Kfz.234.2 1/35 (35414) kit review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
  • In-depth review of MiniArt's new 1/35 Puma armoured car with full detailed interior.
    For more similar content, please check out my channel: / @peter-oxley-modelling... .
    Please like, share, comment & subscribe!
    (Please keep all comments friendly to avoid instant cancellation).

Комментарии • 25

  • @durkpederson9797
    @durkpederson9797 Месяц назад +2

    Thanks again for a great review. Personally I prefer the plastic tires in the Miniart kit over the rubber ones in the RFM kit and the way Miniart has done the fenders and side lockers. On the price aspect, the Miniart Puma without interior is cheaper than the interior kit, so that may be worth mentioning in a further comparison review👍

  • @smallscalefutures
    @smallscalefutures Месяц назад +1

    Another great review Peter. Just on your comment about why they split the colour schemes front and back, it's because the first two pages (before folding) are printed in full colour, while the assembly pages are black and white

  • @stevesmodelbuilds5473
    @stevesmodelbuilds5473 Месяц назад +1

    Sorry I missed the end, Peter. A very good review, as always 👍👍. They're learning some lessons from Tamiya and producing great stuff.

  • @BrianSanders-tn7pi
    @BrianSanders-tn7pi Месяц назад +2

    Hi Peter. Definately one of my favourite vehicles of the war. To be honest it all seems a bit to much for me. I mean how many of us ever see the interior of our models ? Unless your making a specific vehicle where the interior was visible then it is pointless. But there is one bonus I suppose , these two new models will chip away at the cost of the old Italeri kits making them cheaper, hopefully. I,ve made all four of the versions of this vehicle in 1/35th already and I also have a Cyber hobby Dragon kit of a proposed version. So I think that I have the 234 pretty well covered. A good video as usual fella 10/10. Good luck.

  • @MartinSparks-ef9gr
    @MartinSparks-ef9gr Месяц назад +1

    Hi Peter. If memory serves, the engine is by tatra and the main gun is the same as the pak 38 (5.cm) but the kwk vehicle version . Both nice kits , I'd be happy with either . Thanks for the review's . M

  • @AubreyStJohn3000
    @AubreyStJohn3000 Месяц назад +1

    Thanks Peter. Great review and some helpful observations. I need one of these and think the price point will steer me towards RFM but the detail options on this one temp me.

  • @JETScaleModels
    @JETScaleModels Месяц назад +1

    The colour printing is on the front and back pages only that's why its split up. Colour is more expensive and arranging a signature is important to get your money's worth.

  • @Emdee5632
    @Emdee5632 Месяц назад +1

    ...
    Well I guess I'm going have to watch this review at a later time.
    I'm looking forward to comparing this kit with the previous Puma kit.

  • @stephengregory7305
    @stephengregory7305 Месяц назад +1

    Dragon did the same thing with multi segment wheels on there puma based models a pain in the arse

  • @mariosaliba8644
    @mariosaliba8644 Месяц назад +1

    Good evening everyone 😊

  • @anjkovo2138
    @anjkovo2138 Месяц назад +1

    👍👍

  • @steve1315
    @steve1315 Месяц назад +1

    Looks jolly nice 👍

  • @philippemasson2205
    @philippemasson2205 Месяц назад +1

    10/10 for Peter ?
    No no no... the engine is a Tatra air cooled diesel, not a Maybach 😊
    For apologies, you have yo build an other Kinetic Sea Harrier 😅😅😅😅
    Keep going, you're allways more interresting to follow

    • @Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab
      @Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab  Месяц назад

      @@philippemasson2205 Ah! But if you read the live chat replay, you can see I corrected myself, so still a 10/10?☺️

    • @philippemasson2205
      @philippemasson2205 Месяц назад

      @@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab well well OK lets go for 11/10, extra bonus
      😄😉

  • @philippemasson2205
    @philippemasson2205 Месяц назад +2

    Is there an other cheaper version without full interior ?

  • @flyboy451
    @flyboy451 Месяц назад +1

    No steered wheels option on that one? And for all that effort on the tyres, they are not weighted? And I can see many parts with annoying flash seams on- the more parts there are, the more there are to clean up. The Ryefield wins hands down for me.

    • @Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab
      @Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab  Месяц назад

      @@flyboy451 I do agree.

    • @flyboy451
      @flyboy451 Месяц назад

      I must say, those Ryfield rubber tyres looked superb- like you I think they are the best I've ever seen! A major advantage for me is that you can paint the wheel and then fit the tyre. No annoying tyre masking!

    • @ДимаСтаниславчук-ь3ш
      @ДимаСтаниславчук-ь3ш Месяц назад

      It is rare yu can get weighted tires straight out of the box, usually its resin aftermarket. Miniart wheels are overall in 6 parts, RFM wheels in 4 parts+plicap. Only 2 details not that much difference.