Definitely at least 65million years as we were hunting dinosaurs and that's when they were around, but do yourselves a favour and have your eyes opened even further.. Go search THE SUMERIAN KING LIST. Than come back tell me why you think Islam and Christianity bomb the sh!t out of Uruk, excuse me I mean "Iraq"
People are dumb when they think only Canada and the USA have Native Americans. The indigenous people or Native Americans live in North America, Central America and South America. They spoke different languages and have different cultures but are of the same DNA...Mississippians, Aztecs, Maya and Inca. Then Europeans invaded and colonized the Americas, and North American Natives now speak French and English because France and England colonized North America, while the Natives in Central America and South America speak Spanish and Portuguese because Spain and Portugal colonized those parts. Yet in Canada and USA the population of Native Americans decreased more drastically, leaving North America mostly white, where as in Central America and South America the Native populations are very large, countries like Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador , Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador have large Native American blood lines. Those brown "Latinos" you see walking in your cities streets, are actually Natives, not Spaniards
I think all comes down to is, the Spaniards didn't want to go through all the hassles because they believed in " Work smart not hard " when you already have a work force that knows where all the resources are aka gold and they thought.." Who the hell wants a jungle ". While on the other hand the Europeans at first did the samething then just decided..."The hell with it" and just took everything, Then the ones that stayed just decided to take it for themselves...and did whatever it took to get it for themselves which was " Treason, theft and genocide " and along the way, they decide to call themselves a new country with democracy with equal rights for everyone...well not really, just for the privilege few, which continues today.
Yeah the WHOLE Melanesia part where there were actually African/Negroid ppls here... making them indigenous to the Americas before the Spanish conquest and Columbus’ “discovery”
@Fol A wrong again black/negro is sociopolitical designation like race. The portuguese referred to american aboriginals as negros de terra and negros de isla, they were calling them blacks from the continent and blacks of the island. What kind of hair do Fijians have, by the way? Yeah afros. You cant win. If someone calls the cops on a man from fiji, are they going to describe them as black or not?
I am Melanesian and had no idea that my ancestors made it all the way to the Americas! That really says a lot as to how great of a seafaring people we Pacific Islanders are.
I’m from El Salvador and I tested with 23andme. I got 0.1% Melanesian. I think 🤔 my Siberian ancestors mixed with the Melanesians in Central America many thousands of years ago.
I’m 3/5 Native American and most people I've met always assumed I was Asian, and I thought that was stupid. I do have small slanted eyes, but that's about it, and then I was walking through the mall and saw a mirror (Which I didn't know was a mirror.) and thought that Asian girl is wearing the same thing as me. And then I looked again and said ”oh wait.... that's me.”
What race is ASIAN ???? Are they Chinese are they Afghanistan - BHO gave them this name and he was wrong Afghanistan has the DNA of Polynesia Chinese have the DNA of Orientals The best and brightest was wrong again ?? sorry but ASIA is not a race ???
Do you really call your self an ASIAN ??? Chinese are called asians Pakistanis are also called asians Are they the same ??? Whose idea was it to call them ALL asians ??? that some one is really stupid Oh really It was ZERO the best and the brightest ??? Aisia is a geographical area not a race Oriental is a race and Polynesia is a race along with NEGROIDS and Caucasians ??? There is no such trace as BLACK either ??? Sorry for the edification ????
@official1sp Mixed Australian Aboriginal here too… I always knew something seemed suspicious growing up with the low information about Australian Aboriginals in the world…now it makes sense, there’s a lotta suppressed info that’s been hidden/untold
Out of all the countries and continents, guess which country/continent I can’t get my passport stamped at? It’s Africa America 😂 how did you test your genealogy? If it was a DNA kit where you send it off, then please get your money back bcuz that’s not how you test genealogy…you have to go through records…family records, government records…spitting in a tube is entertainment purposes according to those DNA sites
@@FaberGeronimo Hi, Friend. A different kind of question for you: do your secondary-school children need tutors? I do have some experience and am well-educated. I wouldn't expect to be paid much. I'm sincere about this. Bradbothell@gmail.com
My mother (she's native American btw) took a DNA test and we were surprised to see that she has DNA from Turkish people, Serbian dna and DNA from Kazakhstan. And DNA from Micronesia, as well as Taiwan, she did have less Spanish blood than we thought and more Italian/Greek.
Because American Indians migrated to America from Central Asia. The homeland of the Turks is Central Asia. (Later they migrated to the west, around 1071) Kazakhs are also Turks. So you shouldn't be surprised that your mother has Turkish blood.
@@zeyneptaskn4814u clearly dunno what u talmbout cuh. Turkish means ppl from turkey. Kazakhs ain turkish if anything they're turkic. Yall jus dunno shi but still talkin like u all do.
I'm from African, Indian (Sikh) and Amerindian (Waraus) descent. I was born in Venezuela and grew up in Guyana. In school we were thought about the bering strait. Clovis points were found in Serpentine (Alaska), New Mexico (America) and El Cayude (Venezuela). But what's really interesting is, aside from spear points and arrow heads, the Amerindian peoples look a lot like Asians. There are 9 tribes in Guyana and all of the tribes share a similar physical feature with the different Asians.
Hi in Guyana you also learn about the pacific islander theory too but its taught in the secondary school level. Hi I'm also of warrau descent as well🤗 I'm also of arawak and karinha descent too. And African, most likely from the Ghanian people since most Guyanese are
Itts Aleex cx Hey, it happens. Both of my parents are native, and my sister was first born with dark skin, but soon ot turned to a white/yellow. Also, if that girl claming she's like 1/16th cherokee (the most common I've heard from my white friends) I recommend to put her on a raft on the Alantic ocean, and push her out to sea..
Edward Jones Meaning what ? The more advanced civilization conqueres the less advanced. If there where less advanced civilizations before the amerindians would they be the actual Americans ?
Rico Suave Of course there never was, but "if" there was a another civilization there, weaker than those Alaskan migrations, they would have been wiped out and Indians would have conquered it eventually, leading to the extinction of those people. Let's say if the Spanish didn't discovered the Americas and the English, Dutch and others didn't have any interest, The Chinese and Japanese would have eventually find it and conquered it because Native Americans weren't developed, there was also a big difference with the diseases they had in Europe and the Native's immune system unable to cope with the diseases.
I went to a museum when I was living in Korea, and I was surprised to see that their ancestors looked like Native American's. i was like: waaaaitt.... lol
I hear u!! I'm a Chinese and when I was about 4 yr old and saw a show it about debating if NA migrated from Asia, I was eagering to see how the "original Americans" look like, then all i saw was a lot of people look like myself. I was thinking probably it was because it was broadcasted in China so they had to use Chinese actors lol
Actually I think they look more Mongolian than Chinese, but Mongolian and China was one country under various dynasties so it depends on the time they travelled there. Their clothes, embroidery, shoes etc are so similar to the ancient Mongolian/Chinese designs, fabrics and patterns, albeit very simple, nothing very complicated or refined like in the royal courts in China.
Todd Crnkovich and yet, somehow, scientists from around the world of different ethnic, cultural, and racial backgrounds can still agree on the results of dna testing. Must be quite the politician out there who is capable of manipulating results from around the world.
macarde10 it’s not politicians. It’s the political and cultural beliefs of the university department chairs that fill the departments with only like minded individuals with the same agendas. I laugh at you and your naïveté.
Todd Crnkovich tinfoil Tuesday, I see. Clearly you have no concept how research, grants, funding and peer review work. I also like how you conveniently ignored the comment regarding researchers from around the world, which naturally would figure in “competing,” countries as well.
It's not New World it's just a pre-exisiting land.... If a group of people don't know something doesn't mean the thing is new... Why always think the euro way...
Well... Europeans looked at the world from an euro point of view. You're just looking for excuses to hate on white people. Everyone knew that it wasn't new land that just popped into existence. It was a new world to European explorers though.
@@Arthur-ot7id There is 2 types of SouthEast-Asians who are mongoloids, the Austronesians and the Austro-Asiatics... but Native Americans look more like the Tsaatan people of Mongolia.
@@BLACK_LIVES_MATTER64 You're right about this. Still I find Southeast Asians like Filipinos, more similar to us Amazonians. But it could be just convergent evolution, cuz we evolve in tropical environments.
“The Spanish cut off the legs of children who ran from them. They poured people full of boiling soap. They made bets as to who, with one sweep of his sword, could cut a person in half. They loosed dogs that ‘devoured an Indian like a hog, at first sight, in less than a moment.’ They used nursing infants for dog food.”
alex p You mean ancient people weren't friendly???! Really?! (Just so you know, sadly nobody was 😉.) The cultures in the world who have had the top most brutal things happen to them in their histories are actually the cultures who don't talk about their histories at all. It might slip out once. but they mostly just accept them. They feel weird when they have to blame somebody or gang up on somebody as a group. They don't want the trouble. They'll abuse themselves before they abuse anybody else. Very strange. (FA)
Spaniards today call that black legend created by English and Protestant Europe to tarnish the image of the Catholic Monarchy of Spain, so they do not accept that in the conquest they committed acts of barbarism against the indigenous people, and compare it with the British colonization that killed all the Indians in North America. Spaniards mixed with the natives, other colonial powers did not do that.
My father is a South East Asian and has red skin high cheekbone, etc super super Native likes. I have seen many ressemblances between Asians nowadays and Natives! Eventually we are all the same!
I'm Chippewa. My whole family turns red when we drink, just as Asians. According to other historians and ancestors it's because we don't produce the enzyme that breaks down alcohol. So we stay drunk longer then others as our bodies break down everything else first, then alcohol.
It's still not well known, but original Japanese - Nihon Sojin- crossed Akebono sea to Kyusyu island far west from Tokyo in about 40,000 BP. They’d prevailed almost over Japanese archipelago up to north, Hokkaido island by 30,000 BP. Paleolithic sites and artifacts in Japan clearly indicate this. They, sea tribe, didn’t stop in Hokkaido naturally and continued prevailing to American continent along Bering seashore of “Kelp highway”. Cold water of North Pole was stopped by Beringia and Bering sea was really connected to sea of Hawaii at that era. Eve, made from bones of young woman by new technology, found in Mexico this time seems to be a descendant of Nihon Sojin.
Yes Native Americans are Mongoloids but they are separate from Far Eastern, Alaska Native, Polynesian, Oceanian, South Asian, Native Caribbean, and Central Asian Mongoloids
It isn't mind boggling to believe people in oceana have used boats and arrived in the new world. Their means of traveling was by boat. Also New Zealand has an underwater continent that was exposed at one point making travel over the Pacific a little more easier.
lol zealandia went under water 23 mil years ago before humans existed . though caledonia and new zealand were bigger during the time of humans so crossing the pacific on both at that time was possible
The problem with that is that until very recent history there was no real way to navigate the ocean star navigation was something that took a lot of people to actually map and figure out to make it work and even if someone was smart enough to figure it out “boats” that our ancient ancestors would have been able to build would have essentially been rafts there would be no sailing it would have just been drifting to an unknown destination which is probably what happened but there’s still the question of how anyone would have survived that
@@danielleclair5848they were cognizant about the sea, they survived likely by fishing, catching turtles and drinking their blood or catching birds and collecting rain water.
I am from Honduras.. I am "mestizo" native Indian and spanish.. I don't like to be called hispanic. I have asian eyes too! It is in my ADN. My Indian blood is stronger than the spanish.
nina nina "Native Americans" as they are called by European settlers have books showing there were natives already here. "Black Indians" that's why pyramids were found in the grand canyon as well as all over the world. Like we know. HIStory is simy that. The king that won the war can rewrite his story
I find it very interesting that DNews is taking sides in what is an unsettled debate right now. Two papers, one in _Nature_ and one in _Science_, were published at the same time and put forth conflicting theories to answer the question of where that pesky Australasian genetic link in the Amazon (and nowhere else in the Americas) came from. The _Nature_ team thinks that Population Y came over sometime in ancient times, while the _Science_ team thinks Population Y came over much later. Additionally there are even more theories that could explain the Australasian link. It is far from settled.
Hank Hill Yes, and also Incas, but each developed their own culture and ethnicity. And them all were nearly extinct by the colonists. That last part sucks.
Yes sir, that's why the Native Americans living in the United States today get mistaken for Mexican a lot, a lot of times you see a Spanish speaker speaking Spanish to a United States Native American but they don't understand lol
You misunderstood what he said, he said the Australian Aboriginals and Pacific islanders went to South America and mixed with the locals.. This is not true in most part, but truth is the original inhabitants of South America were Olmec people, them people were Polynesian, that's why there are trace of that DNA in South Americans blood.. South Americans are descendant of the fallen Angel Enlil who first came to Earth in the land of Sumer, big story but war with other fallen Angels the Anunnaki. The broke up into massive groups, they were the pyramid builders. Millions of years passed after that war, great civilizations were built in India, China, Egypt and the Americas. Again destroyed by war the ancients war each other than great deluge again for the 2nd time. Than new warriors emerged over Asia and the Caucas as most other remnants of humans on the planet were dead! Than the Huns risen and conquered most of the planet, every person you see with straight black hair have Atilla the Huns DNA in them. China knows everything has all history records, western world still discovering what China has known all along
@Raquel Regalado Northwest Southwest America is Northwest Southwest amexem so-called West Africa the maghreb Al-Aqsa - Africa the extreme West so I'm home the Asiatic Darkman is from the whole planet I deal with knowledge not emotions
@Raquel Regalado if we are the oldest people on the planet what the hell do you think who are older than the so-called black people no one you can find dark people are the oldest people on the planet no one else was here all people come from the moabite Asiatic dark woman I'm done talkin fine sources of a people who are older than the so-called black man
An open world video-game set in native america would be awesome, you could spend 100 hours building everything making bonds with characters etc. and then have the colonists come over and wreck everything you've built in a couple of minutes.
Can I play the Comanche? They lasted four hundred years before being set up on the res. Win Conditions: Live Free, Save the Buffalo, and Retain Oklahoma. We will research the tech tree to invent Lawyers and win Major Victory in 2020 at the SCOTUS.
The genome of a child who died some 12,600 years ago in Montana -- the oldest known human remains from North America -- has been sequenced for the first time (2016). The young boy's genetic blueprint reveals that the Americas' first human inhabitants came from Asia, not Europe, laying to rest a long-standing mystery. Conducted by a consortium of scientists led by the University of Copenhagen and including Drs Andrea Manica, Anders Eriksson and Vera Warmuth at the University of Cambridge, the study is published in Nature.
YES, LOOK FOR NORTH AFRICAN AND EUROPEAN GENOME IN IDAHO & MONTANA . LOL . Eriksson WILL ONLY DO OUR BURIALS WITH INDIAN APPROVAL , THE DELAWARE HAVE REFUSED ! LOL IT'S ALL A FRAUD ! facebook.com/dennis.wallace.353250/photos_albums
NO way. The Bering Strait was still covered with IMPENETRABLE ice so the ONLY route would have been from Africa which is about 1800 miles from Brazil. Once U see the Africans had lake Congo Lake Chad, also the Alian Sea which is now the Sahara desert it goes without question they are the 1st Sea Travelers because they traveled in hollowed out trees called canoes for tens on thousands of yrs B4 leaving there homeland. That is the reason why Naia & Luzia had Africoid features. The untold story of the ORIGINAL Blk Natives is IRREFUTABLE once U take in to account the first hand descriptions of the numerous European explorers saying they seen most of the same tribes in Africa. MOST BLK NATIVES fell victim 2 THE RACIAL INTEGRITY ACT that reclassified them as Negros, Blks & Coloreds. See ANACALYPSIS VOL 1 & 2 by Sir Godfrey Higgins & ask yourself WHY IS the most complete book on the History of ALL WORLD NATIONS not a part of our EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM? 💯👌
@@kanewise4239 yes ,way,the sea level and ice sheets were much lower then ,and had primitive boat access. The indigenous American people are of Asian descent.There is no escaping DNA.
The first humans to inhabit the Americas (North, Central & South) came from the South Pacific area. We don't know how, why or the route followed. This group landed in South America and spread northward. They are the ancestors of Mayans, Incans, etc. At a much later time, people came across the Bering Land Bridge into what is now the western part of Canada (which includes Alaska). The South Pacific group arrived in South America long before the Bering Land Bridge group. They occupied the area so long that the Mayan, Incan, etc. peoples advanced to the point of forming societies, erecting buildings, etc. over a wide-spread area (northen South America, Central America & Mexico). The other group did not occupy North America long enough to form societies, erect building, etc. If Europeans had started occupying North America much later than they did, the occupants of North America would have eventually reached progress to match that of the ones that occupied South & Central America.
The general idea is still that they used the land bridge and the original migration was a population with south East Asian ancestry. But it’s hard to say at this point since we find no traces of this migration in North America or on any of the pacific islands leading from south east Asia to South America. The other group did indeed have societies and large urban centers. North America had large confederations of tribe and the vast majority of the population lived in settlements.
🤣🤣🤣 I am native to the Southern America and I know a lot sh!t and Moronm in any acient story but! There is a connection in ancient stories, not Mormon. Not religion. Just think of it as stories of events in history passed down through "time" I have found common denominators in ancient stories from Inanna to Gilgamesh, from the bible to the Quran, from the Mahabharata to the Popol Vuh.. All are connected! As are we!
Woah scientists find one DNA sample and think it is the first American. By the way they found Ishmael's grave from the book of Mormon if you want to look at that video.
@Johnny West oh I was saying do people really believe native Americans were always the way they were when we found them. The reason why is there was many generations of the native Americans and they had ansestors that did things differently. Like in the book of Mormon it mentioned elephants in one part and historians believed elephants were never in American. Just recently they found a buried ancient civilization with temples with elaphants on them. Then they found elaphant bones. Then some people said it was probably there before humans, well there was a spear in the elephant. You see what I'm saying.
Am I the only one who isn't suprised by this at all? Is a 1000 years really that long for that distance? Imagine how far a single generation can settle, let alone 40 generations.
As a maharashtrian I'm proud of my ancestors that they defended Our Land from foreign occupation and I'm proud as a maharashtrian we r a blood of a Sikh and (south indian) and who both were the greatest people in our history and thanks to mother earth .
depends which group your from? if your from one of the Alaskan / North American tribes then yes your a asian mongoloid race, since those groups were the later groups to cross over
Native American DNA (North Americans and Latin Americans from Central and South America) have proven that Native Americans share the closest DNA with the Chukchi and Turkic people like the Uyghurs, Yakuts, Kyrgyz and Altayans out of all the Asian ethnic groups. The languages of many Native Americans from North and Central America have been caught having many similar if not identical words to that of the Turkic languages. It proved the genetic and linguistic links that existed between Native Americans and Turkic people before the Bering Strait crossing that still exists today. It is believed that the Chukchis of Chukotka whom all Native Americans directly descend from, were a Proto-Turkic people before arriving to Siberia from Central Asia in what is now East Turkestan (Uyghurstan), Altay Republic, Sakha (Yakutia) Republic and Kyrgyzstan. Turks do not descend from Mongols, they descend from Turkic people
"Native Americans" are not one people, one language, and one religion, any more than everyone in Eurasia is the same. Many language families have no more relationship to each other than would Arabic and Thai. *Some*groups track easily to Siberian roots, but most do not.
Interesting that if it’s true Natives have East Asian genes. My family and people just started to integrate into modern day society as our village is isolated in the mountains of Oaxaca Mexico. Because of this long isolation, my people still practice their customs and still speak their Native Language-Spanish and English are foreign. Since living in the USA, often times people mistaken us for being from the Philippines, Japanese, or Polynesian because our eyes are slim and almond liked shaped. This is a very common physical feature amongst our people, so I kind of see why people confuse us for being Asian. My people are Zapotecs so if you go to a museum and look at their artifacts, a lot of them have that eye feature which is amazing because our people have existed for hundreds and thousands of years.
For that reason, no one should criticize anyone because we come from the same place. I am a native American from the mixed south, but according to science and stories, we come from Asia or Africa. I don't know why gringos are racist. They also come from the same place. In African countries, there are people. white, we Native Americans have never seen anyone less, even though these lands were first our ancestors', I don't care if the American continent is full of foreigners.
I would really like DNews to do a video on Solutreans. They found prehistoric stone tools in Virginia which were extremely similar to ones made by the Clovis culture in what is now southwest France. Apparently they could've made it to America across the Atlantic by hugging the ice caps and sustaining themselves on things such as seals, fish and using Eskimo survival tactics. There's of course lots of speculation based on only a handful of evidence but it's a very interesting hypothesis.
You shouldn't believe anything that comes out of the mainstream Orthodoxy. Historically speaking, when we look back, it has been wrong each and every time. The world now lives in a time of Chinafication.
@@anthonyfuqua6988 Apparently the Cree have a prevalence of R1b, which is a Western European haplogroup. I also heard about some ancient folklore from native Americans on the east coast describing white giants whom they hunted.
@@Snaut1 Nope. Conspiracy theory. No real Native American or Inuit has anything other than Asian DNA. From Far Eastern Russia and RussIan Steppe-Southern Siberia DNA. A few Polynesians may have made it to South America before 1200's but not enough to effect DNA. Vikings made it to Canada but while they were there about 20 years, they mainly kept to themselves, fought a few times, and traded items but no Icelandic DNA has survived.
I needed a history class to check off and I saw Native American History and thought "hmmm I did like Dances With Wolves so why not?" This professor said people migrated to North America via ocean not the land bridge. He was 100%, that's the way it was in his eyes. I brought up the land bridge and he got kinda mad and on my final I had to write an essay on why people crossed via ocean so I did, but only for the grade......
None of these people know. A spaceship could have shown up and gathered select people and then drop them off in various places on the planet. Nobody knows. But what they will do is build a narrative that suits their politics, like marxists always do. The narrative is, "white people really don't have a place anywhere because white people are to blame for everything. Brown skin people rise up and take over the world." If you don't see this happening you are asleep at the wheel.
My knowledge, the evidence in our reality shows that the light-skinned tribes amongst the human race were the first ones to civilize and stop eating human flesh. I'm sure, once they edged the light-skinned influence out of Politics, the brown-skinned people won't start eating one another. I'm sure we don't have any examples of this going on in our world.
I know Historians and people that write the narrative of our history hate it. But DNA is the quiet guy in the room that no one knows is there then speaks up and tells the truth. And the Truth just keeps getting deeper and deeper the more we learn about DNA
I would absolutely LOVE if D-news did an episode about the evolution of jellyfish! Jellyfish have hardly evolved in millions upon millions of years, and the thory is because they are already the perfect species to live in the environment. I am craving to know more about this ancient species.
You had me at glaciers receding around 2:15. I mean that’s a lot of land covered by water. It makes me wonder about the planetary changes we hear about today. I’m curious what the difference is between natural glacial receding and the glacial receding due to global warming? I know we’re not helping things, but it would be amazing to know what the difference is between natural change to the planet and changes due to human activity. I’m convinced that the planet changes on its own. But are we unintentionally speeding up the process? Are we making the planet do things that it wouldn’t do so rapidly? Or is it doing things naturally at its own pace and we’re just freaking out and blaming ourselves? I’m not trolling. Just me wondering after a few shots of Jameson. 🥴
I believe it’s doing it all on its own earth goes threw cycles of warm up an cool down been doing it since the dawn of time human based global warming is a myth I belive when you take in account all the volcanoes that spew tons of carbon naturally you can see why earth heats up natural green house effect
I admire Native Americans. We dont learn their history in schools since I am Asian (Indian) and I am happy that I am Mongolian because of them. Especially my face look like these people and I am happy about it. I have been always fascinated by Native Americans.
That's the thing about native American genetics; Their genes tend to be dominant (likely due to their inclination to maintain ethnic purity), so that it overpowers other genes from those of a more genetically heterogenous background, and it results in a person looking (similar to) native American while also, for example, having a more unique kind of skin complexion (like dark brown or a yellowish skin tone) or facial feature. They're likely to also have their facial structure and long hair. My own family is this way, and you and your family is probably the same. I'm simply describing what the dilution of native American blood would look like, characteristically.
The Intuit/Eskimo Indians have a story on the migration of their people that’s pretty compelling. It’s on a documentary about a boy named Tuktu who recounts his life growing up as an Eskimo
What about the Giants that use to roam the earth? I know they've found human bones that are gigantic, almost every religion speaks of giants that use to roam the earth. And even some Native American tribes spoke of a giant red haired tribe of people. I feel this would be a great topic to discuss
haha they are just guessing and telling stories by the fire. They have no idea where the Americans or anyone else came from for that matter, and don't get started on the age of things either for they know even less about that.
Okay... I get it that there was a wave or more from the west of the north American continent... but what about the groups that came across on the east coast and north east coast? The ones that traveled down through Hudson Bay from both directions traveled by foot at first and then in a later wave of migration by skin or hollowed out log boat. My family has come from the east on my mothers side... Algonquin.. and from the west on my fathers side .. east Asian. DNA is and has been (as you mentioned) one of the best ways to trace this migration route... BUT it's not just one wave of migrations... Its a route that had been followed repeatedly due to lack of food, the animals leaving because there was no food and the indigenous following the herds so they wouldn't starve... and why did they leave? Because the weather turned ugly and it was either go to a new place or starve. Some groups starved while others... like my parents tribes... survived by following the food. The east and west coast is full of this history as well as the north east... Canada and Hudson Bay had been traveled through on many occasions. If the animals traveled all that way on foot in a short time so can certainly see why man could and did too. Plus... here an interesting twist... the planet was a lot smaller when migrations first started. The plants and fossils prove it. Such an interesting world we live in. Check out stretched earth or growing earth theory ... I for one can see it being a big part of what we are forgetting to take into account. Would love to see this topic of east coast migrations of Algonquin and indigenous talked about by you. Cheers!
North American came from Siberia/central Asia. Same religion, similar languages. South Americans came from near Morocco Australasians came from near Philippines as there was small iselands
Yup, Paleoindian and early European share a common ancestor, closely related to the Mal'ta people who at one point lived around lake Baikal and the Altai
Protohistoric, prehistoric and ancient Negritic Africans were masters of the lands as well as the oceans. They were the first shipbuilders on earth and had to have used watercraft to cross from South East Asia to Australia about 60,000 years ago and from the West Africa/Sahara inland seas region to the Americas. The fact of the northern portion of Africa now known as a vast desert wasteland being a place of large lakes, rivers and fertile regions with the most ancient of civilizations is a fact that has been verified, (see African Presence in Early America, edt. Ivan Van Sertima and Runoko Rashidi, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ "The Principle of Polarity," by Wayne Chandler: 1994.) From that region of Africa as well as East Africa, diffusions of Blacks towards the Americas as early as 30,000 B.C. are believed to have occurred based on findings in a region from Mexico to Brazil which show that American Indians in the region include Negritic types (eg. Olmecs, Afro-Darienite, Black Californians, Chuarras, Garifuna's and others). Much earlier journeys occurred by land sometime before 75,000 B.C. according to the Gladwin Thesis written by C.S. Gladwin. This migration occurred on the Pacific side of the Americas and was began by Africans with Affinities similar to the people of New Guinea, Tasmania, Solomon Islands and Australia. The earliest migrations of African Blacks through Asia then to the Americas seemed to have occurred exactly during the period that the Australian Aborigines and the proto-African ancestors of the Aborigines, Oceanic Negroids (Fijians, Solomon Islanders, Papua-New Guineans, and so on) and other Blacks spread throughout East Asia and the Pacific Islands about one hundred thousand years ago. The fact that these same Blacks are still among the world's seafaring cultures and still regard the sea as sacred and as a place of sustenance is evidence of their ancient dependence on the sea for travel and exploration as well as for commerce and trade. Therefore, they would have had to build sea-worthy ships and boats to take them across the vast expanses of ocean, including the Atlantic, Indian Ocean (both the Atlantic and Indian Oceans were called the Ethiopian Sea, in the Middle Ages) and the Pacific Ocean.
that sounds Iike something you wouId hear from those fake history channeIs, that teII fairytaIes... have you ever seen this photo named 'A Kroomen, an African SaiIor' from "dr imhotep" www.sciencesource.com/archive/-SS2913715.html the oIdest skuII ever found of a modern 'negroid' is onIy 6,4OO Years 0Id... the ancestors of african americans are centraI & west african bantus, which are not reIated to austraIoids, austronesians, capoids, nubians etc... west africans arrived in the americas more than 4OO year ago & before that, the arabs were ensIaving them... in which started in the 7th century (year 601) and Iasted for more than a 1OOO years... hence african americans being brown & not bIack www.theroot.com/exactly-how-black-is-black-america-1790895185 DNA resuIts from the aImost 1O,OOO year oId kennewick man, showed he was an american 'indian' fox41yakima.com/unexpected-dna-link-man-shares-paternal-haplogroup-with-kennewick-man/ which makes sense, when you see this fuII bIooded american 'indian' en.academic.ru/pictures/enwiki/77/Mosy_Higgins_Maidu_man_age_27_American_Indian_Northern_California.png aIso from the DNA resuIts of Iuzia, it showed she was amerindian... www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-11/fda-tnf110918.php and from the DNA resuIts of the capoids/khoisan, it shows they have 14 to 4O% western eurasian DNA... www.newscientist.com/article/dn24988-humanitys-forgotten-return-to-africa-revealed-in-dna/ Check these OImecs... ruclips.net/video/g0Fp492w7x4/видео.htmlm38s Watch the OImec taIking ruclips.net/video/3slGpsTqn_8/видео.htmlm2s
People started out in Ethiopia and Somalia so I would like a video on that topic covering the various races we have today compared to the beginning. Another topic is hair and skin from that same region, how did we end up with such diversity? It doesn’t seem that should be but here we are.
I’m curious to know how is it that ancient civilizations like the Babylonians, Egyptians, Greeks and others kept records that we have been able to discover thousands of years later regarding their culture and history but yet we never hear about such records from the Native American tribes. Or perhaps there are records and I am not aware of and have not been able to find anywhere in my research. Wouldn’t this explain more about their migrations patterns and how they got along or didn’t get along with other tribes? I would like a Native American with this knowledge to make a video or perhaps comment as to where I can find this information. I am always fascinated by ancient history and this is one that interests me
All our knowledge is passed orally. There are a few birch bark scrolls that remain but they are held by individuals within their respective communities. Much of our knowledge is closed practice. That's why a lot can not be found on the internet.
I am curious, not so much of origin, but development of culture. I was told once that most of the artifacts from civilizations in the South are actually much older than the ones found in the North/Bering Srait land mass, and if so, wouldn't it throw the geography off a bit? Can anyone expound?
There are only a couple sites that hold up to scrutiny, but they are still considered outliers. Google around for the Monte Verde sites. Those are the strongest sites that throw off the currently accepted model of peopling of America. But again, they are outliers and are vastly outnumbered by the sites that support the current North to South theory. American Archeology is an awesome and fascinating field and it is definitely still changing as new discoveries are made! Tl;dr: There are a couple sites in South America that don't fit the current timeline, but they don't provide enough evidence to debunk the currently accepted model.
My theory. The first to arrive in America were either of Polynesian or Australoid descent landing off the coast of modern day peru and traveling up north mixing with those who crossed via the Bering strait bridge.
in 2021 - human footprints discovered in the White Sands Nat'l Park in New Mexico have been dated to 21 to 23,000 cal years BP - based on carbon dating seeds in the stratigraphy - - clovis first has been busted - and that puts Monte Verde's 14,500 cal years BP easily within range - especially of coastal migration
si Markeyan lucky for us, we base our knowledge on science and not biases that all people are equally culpable of. The mtdna of all native Americans clearly demonstrate a relation to one another. I think what most people seem to not understand when it comes to similar physical appearances of people, is that convergent evolution is very much a thing. I’m fully aware that the dna shows native Americans come from Asia, but that’s also quite some time ago. Yes there is some evidence of recent genetic admixture of Polynesian, but not in North America. Arguing that just because something appears so must make it so, is just wrong. That’s the same argument of afrocentrists who say that wide noses are exclusive to Africa, while I know, and I’m sure you know, that wide nose are found through out the world, in warm tropical zones. You are stereotyping people that you have never met. I haven’t been to Asia in 20 years, but last time, I specifically remember looking at how some locals reminded me of the Maya in Central America. That does not mean that every Native American looks the same. That holds true for individuals as much as a population group. There are so many reasons that appearance may change in a population. Clearly dna is foremost, but food, environment, physical activity all play a part in appearance. As Native American groups moved throughout the continents, there were bound to be changes in appearance. The Inuit and Aleut are related to the rest of the native Americans. My comment about Asia refers to your generalizing by using a broad term of Asian. It’s clear that native Americans are descendants of Asians from the Siberia in the north, dna says as much.
The ancient "Siberians" are not what like 95% of you think. They belonged to a group called ANE or Ancient North Eurasian. A group that lead to some European groups and some Asian Groups as well. The Siberians as we know them today arrived much later from the south. Four thousand years ago if I remember correctly. That group came to North America around 1000 years ago and makes up our most northern Amerindians tribes. 23,000 years ago is a decent ballpark for ANE migration, and they really looked nothing like Asians, Europeans, or Amerindians. Kennewick man is 9-10k old, 13,000 years removed from migration and he still has a hodgepodge of features which is why after facial reconstruction he was still so hard to place. It was just, really, that one group, ANE, in the early migrations that led to essentially 3 different populations around the world, taylor made for their habitats after thousands of years. Not all Europeans have ANE and not all Asians have ANE but all the non northern Amerindians have ANE
dogs101o because strong family bonds and units are the backbone of all successful cultures which is exactly why the Democrat communist want to ruin families in America because it will precipitate the fall of America and I'm not going to stand by for that s***
Amazing! Austro-Melanesian DNA found in some native Amerindian groups. Check out study by Skoglund and Reich (2016) They found that DNA of living and ancient peoples was detected in modern Amerindians that linked them to native peoples from Australasia and Melanesia. This Australasian/Melanesian admixture was found in living Native Americans, such as Aleutian Islanders and the Surui people of Amazonian Brazil.
First nation Canadian here. when i went to japan i don't know if it was because of factors beyond my knowledge but a lot f the people there assumed i was Chinese / Japanese. im of course 186CM (6.1) height is what gave me away from not being from either of the country's. We do share a few similarities
I have a question. Why are the first Americans called Native American? Shouldn’t they just be called American? Any foreigner would be African American, Asian American, euro American, etc. No?
It's a term from a historical perspective. They are considered native relative to the humans that would come later (in the case of the US these were mostly Europeans). Presently, anyone born in the US would and should identify as "American". Obviously, some Americans choose to identify with hyphenated versions of whatever they please. You are never foreign to your own homeland.
@@davidjack7418 Well, there's another issue there. America is a rather loose term. South vs North and then Canadians have never wanted to be mistaken as someone from USA. So, if we are to bicker over semantics, "Americans" should be called statesmen or something to that effect. If anyone could identify as an american I suppose it would only be First Nations/Natives.
I am proud to have Native American and therefore mongoloid dna. I don’t know why some people think it’s shameful or foreign that they come from Asia. It’s really sad.
Look up the seri or originally know as the comcaac. Our group has been isolated on our land and islands for several thousand years with a unique language compared to all the other nations of America. My grandpa and others in our nations are dark skined, black hair, and some have wider noses. I'm mixed hence my lighter skin but my people would probably sum up what the original indigenous looked like
Oh and by the way all the different Indian tribes in America were Hebrews and they all yes I said all spoke the hebrew language. Europeans have been lying and suppressing this history for years.
That can’t be when the majority of archaeologists are no longer white. You also ignore the other disciplines such as biology, forensics, and genetics that seemingly contradict your view.
Being 1/3 Native American (and a whole bunch of other stuff) I was just in Asia and everyone thought I was part asian usually, Chinese or Filipino 😆 I mean I guess they’re not technically wrong!
I know right, ignore the Olmec's, or skraelings. These assholes love to alter history to cover up the fact that we would kick half of the out and imprison the other half for war crimes against humanity!!! You gotta love how they choose actors over scientist's to spew their bullshit. "Native Indians" aka Amerinds have only been on this continent for 8,000 years!!!
Sterlin Walker Natives were most likely the first ones here though as new evidence supports this. Whites still were NOT here first. And don't bring up that dumb solutrean hypothesis crap as your argument I allready proved someone wrong about that hypothesis.
Sterlin Walker Anzick boy who was 12,500 years old was native american not European not black. Naia who was oldest ever found was around 13,500 to 14,000 years old she was proven to be native american not European,not black. If you look up the shaindong project they found many stone tools in Asia that look just like the ones found in north america. That have that same flint style. There have been stone tools found in north america to be as old as 50,000 years old. If this is true this puts Asians in north america 50,000 years ago.
New DNA tests reveal that native Americans and Europeans have common ancestors called Eurasians that even preceded the Asians who were supposed to have crossed into the Americas through Bering strait. These Eurasians made the long journey to the Americas through the central Asia, east Asia, the Bering strait into the Americas.
amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.theguardian.com/science/2018/feb/21/rejecting-the-solutrean-hypothesis-the-first-peoples-in-the-americas-were-not-from-europe?amp_js_v=a2&_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCCAE%3D#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&_tf=From%20%251%24s&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fscience%2F2018%2Ffeb%2F21%2Frejecting-the-solutrean-hypothesis-the-first-peoples-in-the-americas-were-not-from-europe Wrong the solutrean hypothesis has been proven wrong.The DNA X which is used for connection between whites and natives is wrong X is more of a Siberian connection.Whites were not here first.
@@rjjameson1439 The race question is always a vexing interference and throws any discovery off balance. The color or pigmentation is, I believe, a phenomenon, which came into being only 10,000 years ago. There is nothing called a "pure" race in the world today. Racism is only for the ignorant and insecure people. Humans are mixed and are continuously mixing. 15,000 year ago, a population living in northern Eurasia was not the primary ancestral population of the present-day inhabitants of the region.Some from this people migrated across Siberia and contributed to the people that crossed the Bering land bridge and gave rise to Native Americans. THEY ARE NOT NECESSARILY WHITE EUROPEANS. Others migrated to the west and contributed to the Europeans. The ancient north Eurasians would have been called a "race" had they lived today, as they must have been genetically about as differentiated from all other European populations who lived at the time as today's West Eurasians, native Americans and east Asians are from one another.
@@vineethjoshy4819 Natives were here first end of story they did not come from Europe there are to many problems with the Solutrean hypothesis. But I appreciate your opinion.
Native Americans and all other tribes living in this Hemisphere have always been here, they developed over the decades as a independent human race, the land bridge theory is just that, "A Theory"!!
13,000 years? How do you explain Monte Verde in chile caarbon and other dated (Tom Dillehay) at 14,000+ years, Meadowcroft cave about the same. Maya DNA has been raced to Lake Baikal in souther Siberia.
I am a firm believer of the land bridge from Asia to North America and that it enabled people to migrate from Asia to North and Central America. This occurred during the height of the last great ice age when glaciers covered a large portion of what is now Canada and down into the northern part of the United States. What I would like to know is if there was a land bridge from Asia to North America, was there also a land bridge from Europe across what is now the northern Atlantic? There is some evidence of tools found in northeastern United States and the eastern provinces of Canada. Have any of those fossils been dated and could we have had Europeans as well as Asians making up the first Americans?
No land bridge from Europe, but an ice bridge. Also pretty easy sailing from Africa to the Americas. There are no confirmed Solutrean tools in the Americas, but it is possible there is a connection.
@@nmarbletoe8210 I can find that easy to agree with. The north, polar ice was very large and far reaching. As for the sea passage from Africa to the western hemisphere being an easy one....I have my doubts. So little in the way of evidence. I'm sure those African people living on the western side of the continent might have had written language that was familiar to them, but when they were exploited for human slaves, the people retreated into the interior. Slavers and dealers in human slaves would have destroyed any documentation of the people there. The only history then, would be oral and passed down from surviving generations. It's sad to think of how many people with great potential, vanished and there is little known.
This so interesting. Crazy the journey these groups made. Just walking through out generations not knowing where to go. The weather, Illness, food gathering just fascinating how these people did it.
This is one of the reasons why history and science were my favorite subjects in school.
Bruh😑
Yes. But u gotta know math it's the most important
Science 🤮
What subjects are left then?
School education is bollox
This is because human civilization is much older than we're told.
I completely agree!
Lumaria!!!
Definitely at least 65million years as we were hunting dinosaurs and that's when they were around, but do yourselves a favour and have your eyes opened even further..
Go search THE SUMERIAN KING LIST.
Than come back tell me why you think Islam and Christianity bomb the sh!t out of Uruk, excuse me I mean "Iraq"
No it isn't but it was more advanced
What they’re teaching us is bias propaganda
People are dumb when they think only Canada and the USA have Native Americans. The indigenous people or Native Americans live in North America, Central America and South America. They spoke different languages and have different cultures but are of the same DNA...Mississippians, Aztecs, Maya and Inca. Then Europeans invaded and colonized the Americas, and North American Natives now speak French and English because France and England colonized North America, while the Natives in Central America and South America speak Spanish and Portuguese because Spain and Portugal colonized those parts. Yet in Canada and USA the population of Native Americans decreased more drastically, leaving North America mostly white, where as in Central America and South America the Native populations are very large, countries like Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador , Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador have large Native American blood lines. Those brown "Latinos" you see walking in your cities streets, are actually Natives, not Spaniards
+Rene Arce omg somebody who fucking understands
Blue Azul why doesn’t anybody talk about the Olmecs? They are the older than Aztec and Mayans
What about Inuit people?
Blue Azul I agree. Unlike the english, the spanish didn't kill us all. Otherwise I wouldn't be making this comment
I think all comes down to is, the Spaniards didn't want to go through all the hassles because they believed in " Work smart not hard " when you already have a work force that knows where all the resources are aka gold and they thought.." Who the hell wants a jungle ". While on the other hand the Europeans at first did the samething then just decided..."The hell with it" and just took everything, Then the ones that stayed just decided to take it for themselves...and did whatever it took to get it for themselves which was " Treason, theft and genocide " and along the way, they decide to call themselves a new country with democracy with equal rights for everyone...well not really, just for the privilege few, which continues today.
I like how everyone below ignored the Australian aboroginals part
And Papua New Guinea and Solomon islands aka black people
@@gregwhitenerel7846 exactly
@Fol A They are dark as any other people called black. They have afro hair. Indigenous Australians call themselves blackfellas. You're a moron.
Yeah the WHOLE Melanesia part where there were actually African/Negroid ppls here... making them indigenous to the Americas before the Spanish conquest and Columbus’ “discovery”
@Fol A wrong again black/negro is sociopolitical designation like race. The portuguese referred to american aboriginals as negros de terra and negros de isla, they were calling them blacks from the continent and blacks of the island. What kind of hair do Fijians have, by the way? Yeah afros. You cant win. If someone calls the cops on a man from fiji, are they going to describe them as black or not?
I am Melanesian and had no idea that my ancestors made it all the way to the Americas! That really says a lot as to how great of a seafaring people we Pacific Islanders are.
I’m from El Salvador and I tested with 23andme. I got 0.1% Melanesian. I think 🤔 my Siberian ancestors mixed with the Melanesians in Central America many thousands of years ago.
well
U guys r technical Asians or africans so yay.
@@Zigga.kepler they are there own race .
@@jjjjjj9410 melanesians are ancestors of early migrants of Asia and Africa.
@@Zigga.kepler nope... white people deploy in South East asian 1000 year ago
This explains why my aunt told me that my great-grandmother was half Native American and I look Chinese. Thanks for the info.
Exactly
@Coco NUTS Yes, I'm mixed, black, Native American, South Asian, and white. At least that's what my ancestry DNA test said.
I could pass for biracial with black and Chinese.
@@padussia Percentage of each you are mix with pls? ;L
@@mcfame74 You are a aboriginal to this land the was just lieing and that DNA shit is false I read about that
I’m 3/5 Native American and most people I've met always assumed I was Asian, and I thought that was stupid. I do have small slanted eyes, but that's about it, and then I was walking through the mall and saw a mirror (Which I didn't know was a mirror.) and thought that Asian girl is wearing the same thing as me. And then I looked again and said ”oh wait.... that's me.”
What race is ASIAN ????
Are they Chinese are they Afghanistan -
BHO gave them this name and he was wrong
Afghanistan has the DNA of Polynesia
Chinese have the DNA of Orientals
The best and brightest was wrong again ?? sorry but
ASIA is not a race ???
Do you really call your self an ASIAN ???
Chinese are called asians
Pakistanis are also called asians
Are they the same ???
Whose idea was it to call them ALL asians ???
that some one is really stupid
Oh really
It was ZERO the best and the brightest ???
Aisia is a geographical area not a race
Oriental is a race and Polynesia is a race along with NEGROIDS and Caucasians ???
There is no such trace as BLACK either ???
Sorry for the edification ????
yes I have evidence that your ancestors came to China
@@oliverphippen1957 mongoloid is the correct name for east/central/north asians
Not all native Americans are Asian tho in Latin America we are Asian human from back then and aboriginal human mixed that’s why we look strange
I am African American, and I did one of those genealogy tests and discovered I was sixty percent Australian Aborigine. This explains a lot, thank you.
You are probably not African and those tests lie
Which one you use?
@official1sp Mixed Australian Aboriginal here too… I always knew something seemed suspicious growing up with the low information about Australian Aboriginals in the world…now it makes sense, there’s a lotta suppressed info that’s been hidden/untold
Out of all the countries and continents, guess which country/continent I can’t get my passport stamped at?
It’s Africa America 😂 how did you test your genealogy? If it was a DNA kit where you send it off, then please get your money back bcuz that’s not how you test genealogy…you have to go through records…family records, government records…spitting in a tube is entertainment purposes according to those DNA sites
I bet you didn't read the fine print 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 There is no such thing as african americans
IF YOU READ THIS YOU ARE AWESOME
FreakinYAY if you read this you're even more awesome ;)
I you read this you will die in 7 hours unless you reply with #safetystalin
Zayanz If you read this you wont die
Enel The God If you read this, you will die in 3 minutes... unless you reply.
***** If you read this you wont die in 3 minutes
I AM A DESCENDANT OF THE YUMAN AND HOHOKAM. MY DAD IS A (HUALAPAI) MY MOTHER IS A (YAVAPAI APACHE) 👍🏽👍🏽 🇺🇸
Nice can u tell me about how you guys live
@@kabirhassan7433 WHAT DO YOU WANT TO KNOW?
@@FaberGeronimo Hi, Friend. A different kind of question for you: do your secondary-school children need tutors? I do have some experience and am well-educated. I wouldn't expect to be paid much.
I'm sincere about this.
Bradbothell@gmail.com
I would love to hear every historical account that has been told to you through your ancestors.
@@ashleybrister5033 Go back to Europe and leave us alone.
My mother (she's native American btw) took a DNA test and we were surprised to see that she has DNA from Turkish people, Serbian dna and DNA from Kazakhstan. And DNA from Micronesia, as well as Taiwan, she did have less Spanish blood than we thought and more Italian/Greek.
Was there any Griego in your tree
Because American Indians migrated to America from Central Asia. The homeland of the Turks is Central Asia. (Later they migrated to the west, around 1071) Kazakhs are also Turks. So you shouldn't be surprised that your mother has Turkish blood.
@@zeyneptaskn4814u clearly dunno what u talmbout cuh. Turkish means ppl from turkey. Kazakhs ain turkish if anything they're turkic. Yall jus dunno shi but still talkin like u all do.
@@zeyneptaskn4814plus dont call em indians they ain no indians they native americans
The Turkish and Serbian DNA is likely a more recent development in her family history, and not part of her native American ancestry.
I'm from African, Indian (Sikh) and Amerindian (Waraus) descent.
I was born in Venezuela and grew up in Guyana.
In school we were thought about the bering strait.
Clovis points were found in Serpentine (Alaska), New Mexico (America) and El Cayude (Venezuela).
But what's really interesting is, aside from spear points and arrow heads, the Amerindian peoples look a lot like Asians.
There are 9 tribes in Guyana and all of the tribes share a similar physical feature with the different Asians.
they say africa decendend from humans but we need bigger computers in the future to proof it.
Hi in Guyana you also learn about the pacific islander theory too but its taught in the secondary school level.
Hi I'm also of warrau descent as well🤗
I'm also of arawak and karinha descent too. And African, most likely from the Ghanian people since most Guyanese are
Native pride
Dakotah Headbird You whiter than a jar of Hillman mayonnaise. Stop.
Itts Aleex cx Hey, it happens. Both of my parents are native, and my sister was first born with dark skin, but soon ot turned to a white/yellow. Also, if that girl claming she's like 1/16th cherokee (the most common I've heard from my white friends) I recommend to put her on a raft on the Alantic ocean, and push her out to sea..
ArlesDuboulaVEVO he can be mixed
Born here pride.
Yeah, native americans are simply people from kazachstan who went for a VERY long walk. In fact, they stole the land from buffalos. REPENT NOW!
The ACTUAL Americans
Edward Jones Meaning what ? The more advanced civilization conqueres the less advanced. If there where less advanced civilizations before the amerindians would they be the actual Americans ?
^^Umm dude you just said "if" and that's a huge "if" because they never was anyone here before them...
Rico Suave Of course there never was, but "if" there was a another civilization there, weaker than those Alaskan migrations, they would have been wiped out and Indians would have conquered it eventually, leading to the extinction of those people.
Let's say if the Spanish didn't discovered the Americas and the English, Dutch and others didn't have any interest, The Chinese and Japanese would have eventually find it and conquered it because Native Americans weren't developed, there was also a big difference with the diseases they had in Europe and the Native's immune system unable to cope with the diseases.
Gabriel Stan I don't know why you're getting defensive. He just said they were here first.
Nutty151 That's not an argument.
I went to a museum when I was living in Korea, and I was surprised to see that their ancestors looked like Native American's. i was like: waaaaitt.... lol
I hear u!! I'm a Chinese and when I was about 4 yr old and saw a show it about debating if NA migrated from Asia, I was eagering to see how the "original Americans" look like, then all i saw was a lot of people look like myself. I was thinking probably it was because it was broadcasted in China so they had to use Chinese actors lol
Yea dumb dumb thats where they migrated from
Actually I think they look more Mongolian than Chinese, but Mongolian and China was one country under various dynasties so it depends on the time they travelled there. Their clothes, embroidery, shoes etc are so similar to the ancient Mongolian/Chinese designs, fabrics and patterns, albeit very simple, nothing very complicated or refined like in the royal courts in China.
Asians came here and breeded, there is evidence of them being here but no evidence of native American DNA in asia
My grandmother looked Japanese. But she was Mayan from El Salvador
The theories about peopling of the world is now and has always been greatly tainted by politics.
European lies
Demarcus Garner hahahaha!!!!
Todd Crnkovich and yet, somehow, scientists from around the world of different ethnic, cultural, and racial backgrounds can still agree on the results of dna testing. Must be quite the politician out there who is capable of manipulating results from around the world.
macarde10 it’s not politicians. It’s the political and cultural beliefs of the university department chairs that fill the departments with only like minded individuals with the same agendas. I laugh at you and your naïveté.
Todd Crnkovich tinfoil Tuesday, I see. Clearly you have no concept how research, grants, funding and peer review work. I also like how you conveniently ignored the comment regarding researchers from around the world, which naturally would figure in “competing,” countries as well.
It's not New World it's just a pre-exisiting land....
If a group of people don't know something doesn't mean the thing is new...
Why always think the euro way...
The "New World" is a term used to fool folks. The new world is imagined by those same folks who created religion. There is nothing new.
Its called the new world because it was new for most of the world
Well... Europeans looked at the world from an euro point of view. You're just looking for excuses to hate on white people.
Everyone knew that it wasn't new land that just popped into existence. It was a new world to European explorers though.
@Raymond Palmer You sound like an insane person.
@Raymond Palmer I love how dedicated you are 😂
This is why sometimes I couldn't tell Asian, full blooded Native American and Mexican who has less features of Spanish apart.
Wait until somebody speaks to understand who they are.
Amigo Kandu more like wait who tries to mug you, who tries to scam you and who tries to drink and do a bunch of drugs
East Asian have more light skin than us Natives. But Southeast Asian look more similar.
@@Arthur-ot7id There is 2 types of SouthEast-Asians who are mongoloids, the Austronesians and the Austro-Asiatics... but Native Americans look more like the Tsaatan people of Mongolia.
@@BLACK_LIVES_MATTER64 You're right about this. Still I find Southeast Asians like Filipinos, more similar to us Amazonians. But it could be just convergent evolution, cuz we evolve in tropical environments.
“The Spanish cut off the legs of children who ran from them. They poured people full of boiling soap. They made bets as to who, with one sweep of his sword, could cut a person in half. They loosed dogs that ‘devoured an Indian like a hog, at first sight, in less than a moment.’ They used nursing infants for dog food.”
alex p You mean ancient people weren't friendly???! Really?!
(Just so you know, sadly nobody was 😉.)
The cultures in the world who have had the top most brutal things happen to them in their histories are actually the cultures who don't talk about their histories at all. It might slip out once. but they mostly just accept them. They feel weird when they have to blame somebody or gang up on somebody as a group. They don't want the trouble. They'll abuse themselves before they abuse anybody else. Very strange.
(FA)
Europeans don't like being from Europe? They try to lay claims to everyone else's continent
Spaniards today call that black legend created by English and Protestant Europe to tarnish the image of the Catholic Monarchy of Spain, so they do not accept that in the conquest they committed acts of barbarism against the indigenous people, and compare it with the British colonization that killed all the Indians in North America. Spaniards mixed with the natives, other colonial powers did not do that.
alex p and water is wet
@@qingye8547 what a load of bollocks
My father is a South East Asian and has red skin high cheekbone, etc super super Native likes.
I have seen many ressemblances between Asians nowadays and Natives!
Eventually we are all the same!
Thats what im sayinggg it had me searching up “are native and asians almost alike” lmaoo
Lots of Filipinos looks like Natives
I'm Chippewa. My whole family turns red when we drink, just as Asians. According to other historians and ancestors it's because we don't produce the enzyme that breaks down alcohol. So we stay drunk longer then others as our bodies break down everything else first, then alcohol.
It's still not well known, but original Japanese - Nihon Sojin- crossed Akebono sea to Kyusyu island far west from Tokyo in about 40,000 BP. They’d prevailed almost over Japanese archipelago up to north, Hokkaido island by 30,000 BP. Paleolithic sites and artifacts in Japan clearly indicate this. They, sea tribe, didn’t stop in Hokkaido naturally and continued prevailing to American continent along Bering seashore of “Kelp highway”. Cold water of North Pole was stopped by Beringia and Bering sea was really connected to sea of Hawaii at that era. Eve, made from bones of young woman by new technology, found in Mexico this time seems to be a descendant of Nihon Sojin.
that s why Japan want to claim Hawaii as their land. it makes sense now..
What happened when the american broke his arm?
He went broke.
Slap Everything haha
why is this so true
ohhh...
What happened when the Canadian broke his arm?
Nothing, the doctor said sorry
Necromaster2077 No, if a Canadian broke his arm, he would get free healthcare and be happy.
Yes Native Americans are Mongoloids but they are separate from Far Eastern, Alaska Native, Polynesian, Oceanian, South Asian, Native Caribbean, and Central Asian Mongoloids
@End of the World. That's because they were white they were called $5 Indians you should look that up
End of the World. Yeah all the survivors .. they probably killed or mixed in the others
@@teahgurl no they were all reclassify and called something else
Black Lantern hence “mixed in with others” lol
South asians are not mongoloids, there are some mongoloids in north-eastern india but most south asians are not mixed with mongoloid.
It isn't mind boggling to believe people in oceana have used boats and arrived in the new world. Their means of traveling was by boat. Also New Zealand has an underwater continent that was exposed at one point making travel over the Pacific a little more easier.
lol zealandia went under water 23 mil years ago before humans existed . though caledonia and new zealand were bigger during the time of humans so crossing the pacific on both at that time was possible
The problem with that is that until very recent history there was no real way to navigate the ocean star navigation was something that took a lot of people to actually map and figure out to make it work and even if someone was smart enough to figure it out “boats” that our ancient ancestors would have been able to build would have essentially been rafts there would be no sailing it would have just been drifting to an unknown destination which is probably what happened but there’s still the question of how anyone would have survived that
@@danielleclair5848they were cognizant about the sea, they survived likely by fishing, catching turtles and drinking their blood or catching birds and collecting rain water.
@@danielleclair5848 There were plenty of people who navigated via stars with quartz crystals...
Proud first American descendant. I even still retain my incredible Asian eyes ^_^
... And Mexican
White skin is also African...
read your Bible man God created heaven and earth nearly 6,000 years ago
I am from Honduras.. I am "mestizo" native Indian and spanish.. I don't like to be called hispanic. I have asian eyes too! It is in my ADN. My Indian blood is stronger than the spanish.
nina nina "Native Americans" as they are called by European settlers have books showing there were natives already here. "Black Indians" that's why pyramids were found in the grand canyon as well as all over the world. Like we know. HIStory is simy that. The king that won the war can rewrite his story
I find it very interesting that DNews is taking sides in what is an unsettled debate right now. Two papers, one in _Nature_ and one in _Science_, were published at the same time and put forth conflicting theories to answer the question of where that pesky Australasian genetic link in the Amazon (and nowhere else in the Americas) came from.
The _Nature_ team thinks that Population Y came over sometime in ancient times, while the _Science_ team thinks Population Y came over much later. Additionally there are even more theories that could explain the Australasian link. It is far from settled.
Interesting thanks
So Native Americans and Aztecs have the same dna?
Hank Hill Yes, and also Incas, but each developed their own culture and ethnicity. And them all were nearly extinct by the colonists. That last part sucks.
Aztec are a type of Native American. Same with the other tribes on the American continent
Yes sir, that's why the Native Americans living in the United States today get mistaken for Mexican a lot, a lot of times you see a Spanish speaker speaking Spanish to a United States Native American but they don't understand lol
Yup, they just have different cultures, kinda like scots and Irish have different cultures but they are both white ppl
Yup, Yup, Yup, mmhhmmm
***** this. so much this
"mixing with the locals"
So they weren't the first.. people--the "locals" were.
WHO were "the locals" where did they come from... ??
You misunderstood what he said, he said the Australian Aboriginals and Pacific islanders went to South America and mixed with the locals..
This is not true in most part, but truth is the original inhabitants of South America were Olmec people, them people were Polynesian, that's why there are trace of that DNA in South Americans blood..
South Americans are descendant of the fallen Angel Enlil who first came to Earth in the land of Sumer, big story but war with other fallen Angels the Anunnaki. The broke up into massive groups, they were the pyramid builders. Millions of years passed after that war, great civilizations were built in India, China, Egypt and the Americas. Again destroyed by war the ancients war each other than great deluge again for the 2nd time. Than new warriors emerged over Asia and the Caucas as most other remnants of humans on the planet were dead! Than the Huns risen and conquered most of the planet, every person you see with straight black hair have Atilla the Huns DNA in them.
China knows everything has all history records, western world still discovering what China has known all along
@@iamnine7776 Remember all original people's are dark skin everywhere
@Raquel Regalado Northwest Southwest America is Northwest Southwest amexem so-called West Africa the maghreb Al-Aqsa - Africa the extreme West so I'm home the Asiatic Darkman is from the whole planet I deal with knowledge not emotions
@Raquel Regalado repatriation meaning repairing a nation so-called black people don't have a nationality calling themselves black we are moors
@Raquel Regalado if we are the oldest people on the planet what the hell do you think who are older than the so-called black people no one you can find dark people are the oldest people on the planet no one else was here all people come from the moabite Asiatic dark woman
I'm done talkin fine sources of a people who are older than the so-called black man
I was recently reading up about Melanism and Amelanism. Was quite interesting. Maybe DNews can do a piece about the different pigment conditions?
FrozenEternity local gene pools, mutations and epigenetics. Nice.
An open world video-game set in native america would be awesome, you could spend 100 hours building everything making bonds with characters etc. and then have the colonists come over and wreck everything you've built in a couple of minutes.
Damn ....lol
Can I play the Comanche? They lasted four hundred years before being set up on the res. Win Conditions: Live Free, Save the Buffalo, and Retain Oklahoma. We will research the tech tree to invent Lawyers and win Major Victory in 2020 at the SCOTUS.
Red Dead Redemption 2
The genome of a child who died some 12,600 years ago in Montana -- the oldest known human remains from North America -- has been sequenced for the first time (2016). The young boy's genetic blueprint reveals that the Americas' first human inhabitants came from Asia, not Europe, laying to rest a long-standing mystery. Conducted by a consortium of scientists led by the University of Copenhagen and including Drs Andrea Manica, Anders Eriksson and Vera Warmuth at the University of Cambridge, the study is published in Nature.
YES, LOOK FOR NORTH AFRICAN AND EUROPEAN GENOME IN IDAHO & MONTANA . LOL . Eriksson WILL ONLY DO OUR BURIALS WITH INDIAN APPROVAL , THE DELAWARE HAVE REFUSED ! LOL IT'S ALL A FRAUD ! facebook.com/dennis.wallace.353250/photos_albums
NO way. The Bering Strait was still covered with IMPENETRABLE ice so the ONLY route would have been from Africa which is about 1800 miles from Brazil. Once U see the Africans had lake Congo Lake Chad, also the Alian Sea which is now the Sahara desert it goes without question they are the 1st Sea Travelers because they traveled in hollowed out trees called canoes for tens on thousands of yrs B4 leaving there homeland.
That is the reason why Naia & Luzia had Africoid features. The untold story of the ORIGINAL Blk Natives is IRREFUTABLE once U take in to account the first hand descriptions of the numerous European explorers saying they seen most of the same tribes in Africa. MOST BLK NATIVES fell victim 2 THE RACIAL INTEGRITY ACT that reclassified them as Negros, Blks & Coloreds.
See ANACALYPSIS VOL 1 & 2 by Sir Godfrey Higgins & ask yourself WHY IS the most complete book on the History of ALL WORLD NATIONS not a part of our EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM? 💯👌
@@kanewise4239 yes ,way,the sea level and ice sheets were much lower then ,and had primitive boat access. The indigenous American people are of Asian descent.There is no escaping DNA.
@@iveseen1 ruclips.net/video/oYUhB1V3TK0/видео.html
@@kanewise4239 we are dark brown skin not black from Africa
The first humans to inhabit the Americas (North, Central & South) came from the South Pacific area. We don't know how, why or the route followed. This group landed in South America and spread northward. They are the ancestors of Mayans, Incans, etc. At a much later time, people came across the Bering Land Bridge into what is now the western part of Canada (which includes Alaska). The South Pacific group arrived in South America long before the Bering Land Bridge group. They occupied the area so long that the Mayan, Incan, etc. peoples advanced to the point of forming societies, erecting buildings, etc. over a wide-spread area (northen South America, Central America & Mexico). The other group did not occupy North America long enough to form societies, erect building, etc. If Europeans had started occupying North America much later than they did, the occupants of North America would have eventually reached progress to match that of the ones that occupied South & Central America.
The general idea is still that they used the land bridge and the original migration was a population with south East Asian ancestry. But it’s hard to say at this point since we find no traces of this migration in North America or on any of the pacific islands leading from south east Asia to South America.
The other group did indeed have societies and large urban centers. North America had large confederations of tribe and the vast majority of the population lived in settlements.
@@TmanRock9it was buried beneath the sea since the sunken of sundaland
Boy that realy puts a thorn in the Mormon belief system😨😯
🤣🤣🤣 I am native to the Southern America and I know a lot sh!t and Moronm in any acient story but!
There is a connection in ancient stories, not Mormon.
Not religion. Just think of it as stories of events in history passed down through "time"
I have found common denominators in ancient stories from Inanna to Gilgamesh, from the bible to the Quran, from the Mahabharata to the Popol Vuh..
All are connected!
As are we!
@Johnny West do you you really native Americans were always like that?
Woah scientists find one DNA sample and think it is the first American. By the way they found Ishmael's grave from the book of Mormon if you want to look at that video.
@Johnny West what do you mean like what
@Johnny West oh I was saying do people really believe native Americans were always the way they were when we found them. The reason why is there was many generations of the native Americans and they had ansestors that did things differently. Like in the book of Mormon it mentioned elephants in one part and historians believed elephants were never in American. Just recently they found a buried ancient civilization with temples with elaphants on them. Then they found elaphant bones. Then some people said it was probably there before humans, well there was a spear in the elephant. You see what I'm saying.
Am I the only one who isn't suprised by this at all? Is a 1000 years really that long for that distance? Imagine how far a single generation can settle, let alone 40 generations.
We talk about land bridges all the time, but when sea levels were lower would it have been much easier to island hop?
As a maharashtrian I'm proud of my ancestors that they defended Our Land from foreign occupation and I'm proud as a maharashtrian we r a blood of a Sikh and (south indian) and who both were the greatest people in our history and thanks to mother earth .
im native american, is it ok to call myself asian?
depends which group your from? if your from one of the Alaskan / North American tribes then yes your a asian mongoloid race, since those groups were the later groups to cross over
Disturbs the soul. Now the time, Native asking the approval from the immigrants, whether they are from that land.
Yes
Kourtney Smart wtf i didnt say that,i Said that he can call HIM self Asian because native americans came from Asia And im not siberian
Kourtney Smart how do you know that person is Siberian native american
the whole, i was just staring at that "noble gases" shirt you have
Native American DNA (North Americans and Latin Americans from Central and South America) have proven that Native Americans share the closest DNA with the Chukchi and Turkic people like the Uyghurs, Yakuts, Kyrgyz and Altayans out of all the Asian ethnic groups.
The languages of many Native Americans from North and Central America have been caught having many similar if not identical words to that of the Turkic languages. It proved the genetic and linguistic links that existed between Native Americans and Turkic people before the Bering Strait crossing that still exists today. It is believed that the Chukchis of Chukotka whom all Native Americans directly descend from, were a Proto-Turkic people before arriving to Siberia from Central Asia in what is now East Turkestan (Uyghurstan), Altay Republic, Sakha (Yakutia) Republic and Kyrgyzstan. Turks do not descend from Mongols, they descend from Turkic people
But they had also genes of middle east :)
Don't forget that the Turkic people's religion before islam was shamanism like the Native Americans .
I believe it
"Native Americans" are not one people, one language, and one religion, any more than everyone in Eurasia is the same. Many language families have no more relationship to each other than would Arabic and Thai. *Some*groups track easily to Siberian roots, but most do not.
Interesting that if it’s true Natives have East Asian genes. My family and people just started to integrate into modern day society as our village is isolated in the mountains of Oaxaca Mexico. Because of this long isolation, my people still practice their customs and still speak their Native Language-Spanish and English are foreign. Since living in the USA, often times people mistaken us for being from the Philippines, Japanese, or Polynesian because our eyes are slim and almond liked shaped. This is a very common physical feature amongst our people, so I kind of see why people confuse us for being Asian. My people are Zapotecs so if you go to a museum and look at their artifacts, a lot of them have that eye feature which is amazing because our people have existed for hundreds and thousands of years.
For that reason, no one should criticize anyone because we come from the same place. I am a native American from the mixed south, but according to science and stories, we come from Asia or Africa. I don't know why gringos are racist. They also come from the same place. In African countries, there are people. white, we Native Americans have never seen anyone less, even though these lands were first our ancestors', I don't care if the American continent is full of foreigners.
Proud to be INDIAN
@@callmeblt6325 you dumb
Random Guy you’re a stupid uneducated imbecile
yeah India has lots of culture. old temples, curry, Bollywood...
@Indian Guy Pryaj Kumar It's called amerindian or Native American
POLYNESIANS ???
I would really like DNews to do a video on Solutreans. They found prehistoric stone tools in Virginia which were extremely similar to ones made by the Clovis culture in what is now southwest France. Apparently they could've made it to America across the Atlantic by hugging the ice caps and sustaining themselves on things such as seals, fish and using Eskimo survival tactics. There's of course lots of speculation based on only a handful of evidence but it's a very interesting hypothesis.
You shouldn't believe anything that comes out of the mainstream Orthodoxy. Historically speaking, when we look back, it has been wrong each and every time. The world now lives in a time of Chinafication.
Where did their DNA go? The only DNA in Native Americans come from Asia.
@@anthonyfuqua6988 Apparently the Cree have a prevalence of R1b, which is a Western European haplogroup. I also heard about some ancient folklore from native Americans on the east coast describing white giants whom they hunted.
@@Snaut1 Nope. Conspiracy theory. No real Native American or Inuit has anything other than Asian DNA. From Far Eastern Russia and RussIan Steppe-Southern Siberia DNA. A few Polynesians may have made it to South America before 1200's but not enough to effect DNA. Vikings made it to Canada but while they were there about 20 years, they mainly kept to themselves, fought a few times, and traded items but no Icelandic DNA has survived.
Clovis culture wasnt just in the Southwest. Points exactly like it that are older have been found in Washington, South Carolina, Virginia.
I needed a history class to check off and I saw Native American History and thought "hmmm I did like Dances With Wolves so why not?" This professor said people migrated to North America via ocean not the land bridge. He was 100%, that's the way it was in his eyes. I brought up the land bridge and he got kinda mad and on my final I had to write an essay on why people crossed via ocean so I did, but only for the grade......
None of these people know. A spaceship could have shown up and gathered select people and then drop them off in various places on the planet. Nobody knows. But what they will do is build a narrative that suits their politics, like marxists always do. The narrative is, "white people really don't have a place anywhere because white people are to blame for everything. Brown skin people rise up and take over the world."
If you don't see this happening you are asleep at the wheel.
My knowledge, the evidence in our reality shows that the light-skinned tribes amongst the human race were the first ones to civilize and stop eating human flesh. I'm sure, once they edged the light-skinned influence out of Politics, the brown-skinned people won't start eating one another. I'm sure we don't have any examples of this going on in our world.
Beta male light skin people will be the end of civilization for hating themselves
I think both answers are correct they came via land and the ocean.
I know Historians and people that write the narrative of our history hate it. But DNA is the quiet guy in the room that no one knows is there then speaks up and tells the truth. And the Truth just keeps getting deeper and deeper the more we learn about DNA
Man was created by God
End of the World.
So you believe the scientific impossibility that nothing created everything?
@End of the World. do you think two particles rubbed together to create endless matter
I would absolutely LOVE if D-news did an episode about the evolution of jellyfish! Jellyfish have hardly evolved in millions upon millions of years, and the thory is because they are already the perfect species to live in the environment. I am craving to know more about this ancient species.
they won't. if it didn't evolve than it's not news worthy according to dnews
HIGH PRIEST thats what the topic shpuld be. Why didn't they evolve
They had no need to evolve, case closed, happy to help.
+Armin-Senpai ¿ Or you could study and do your own research, I don't think D-News is going to cover that any soon or ever...
LeoSienna I'll have you know, I am researching the reason why they haven't evolved.
You had me at glaciers receding around 2:15. I mean that’s a lot of land covered by water. It makes me wonder about the planetary changes we hear about today. I’m curious what the difference is between natural glacial receding and the glacial receding due to global warming? I know we’re not helping things, but it would be amazing to know what the difference is between natural change to the planet and changes due to human activity. I’m convinced that the planet changes on its own. But are we unintentionally speeding up the process? Are we making the planet do things that it wouldn’t do so rapidly? Or is it doing things naturally at its own pace and we’re just freaking out and blaming ourselves? I’m not trolling. Just me wondering after a few shots of Jameson. 🥴
I believe it’s doing it all on its own earth goes threw cycles of warm up an cool down been doing it since the dawn of time human based global warming is a myth I belive when you take in account all the volcanoes that spew tons of carbon naturally you can see why earth heats up natural green house effect
Politics.. IS the root of GlowBull Warming/Climate Change...
I admire Native Americans. We dont learn their history in schools since I am Asian (Indian) and I am happy that I am Mongolian because of them. Especially my face look like these people and I am happy about it. I have been always fascinated by Native Americans.
That's the thing about native American genetics; Their genes tend to be dominant (likely due to their inclination to maintain ethnic purity), so that it overpowers other genes from those of a more genetically heterogenous background, and it results in a person looking (similar to) native American while also, for example, having a more unique kind of skin complexion (like dark brown or a yellowish skin tone) or facial feature. They're likely to also have their facial structure and long hair. My own family is this way, and you and your family is probably the same. I'm simply describing what the dilution of native American blood would look like, characteristically.
Also, it must be incredibly satisfying to be Asian. Their culture is, for lack of a better word, sublime.
@@AnathemA66 Sure South Korea and China are indeed super!
3:25 sums up this whole video
I love how cacasian history tries to rewrite every one out
@Zack Terson do you even know where you are from don't say your elders were European
@Zack Terson all of those original people were brown see what I mean see how y'all just make up stuff
It's empirical science. Doesn't matter if it's Caucasians, Africans, American Indians, etc.
All conquerers do this. Islam does it currently. And YOU are doing it here on youtube by implying its only "caucasions" who do it.
@@Nunya1951nunya For real darg. Typical mouth breather. He won't talk about Islam like that because they'll put him in line.
Guys spam the back 5 seconds button at the beginning as fast as u can it's so funny
it is actually pretty funny
The Intuit/Eskimo Indians have a story on the migration of their people that’s pretty compelling. It’s on a documentary about a boy named Tuktu who recounts his life growing up as an Eskimo
இந்தியா முழுவதும் தமிழ் மொழி பேசப்பட்ட அதே காலகட்டத்தில் தமிழர்கள் ஆஸ்திரேலியா மற்றும் அமெரிக்கா மற்றும் ஆப்பிரிக்காவுக்கு வந்தனர்.
What about the Giants that use to roam the earth? I know they've found human bones that are gigantic, almost every religion speaks of giants that use to roam the earth. And even some Native American tribes spoke of a giant red haired tribe of people. I feel this would be a great topic to discuss
Taylor Lemons Thor killed of all the ice giants about a thousand years ago.
What giant human bones? Citation please.
Vikings as they are called now a days perhaps?
@@odalissuastegui8508 I’m pretty sure natives were quite tall themselves but the red hair part is weird
@@odalissuastegui8508 :BS > They only roam around European waters!
I love those science theories that explain everything not
They are much better at explaining things than anything else, that’s what they’re science.
haha they are just guessing and telling stories by the fire. They have no idea where the Americans or anyone else came from for that matter, and don't get started on the age of things either for they know even less about that.
@@stephenfletcher5391 so all the archeological sites and laboratory tests are fake we should follow you
@@stephenfletcher5391 🤣
@@chemicsky2772 should u🤣
Native Americans were the migrated Hebrews from Africa. Spanish colonization changed the game.
That's false
How come nobody pinpoints the fact that our DNA is mixed with something else
They don't want reveal we all are relatives.
Proud to have Aztec ancestry!
@Gameonu2011 wtf hahahahaha
@Gameonu2011 lmao no the hell they werent, sorry.
@Gameonu2011 Black?? hahaha you dumb.
Okay... I get it that there was a wave or more from the west of the north American continent... but what about the groups that came across on the east coast and north east coast? The ones that traveled down through Hudson Bay from both directions traveled by foot at first and then in a later wave of migration by skin or hollowed out log boat. My family has come from the east on my mothers side... Algonquin.. and from the west on my fathers side .. east Asian. DNA is and has been (as you mentioned) one of the best ways to trace this migration route... BUT it's not just one wave of migrations... Its a route that had been followed repeatedly due to lack of food, the animals leaving because there was no food and the indigenous following the herds so they wouldn't starve... and why did they leave? Because the weather turned ugly and it was either go to a new place or starve. Some groups starved while others... like my parents tribes... survived by following the food. The east and west coast is full of this history as well as the north east... Canada and Hudson Bay had been traveled through on many occasions. If the animals traveled all that way on foot in a short time so can certainly see why man could and did too. Plus... here an interesting twist... the planet was a lot smaller when migrations first started. The plants and fossils prove it. Such an interesting world we live in. Check out stretched earth or growing earth theory ... I for one can see it being a big part of what we are forgetting to take into account.
Would love to see this topic of east coast migrations of Algonquin and indigenous talked about by you.
Cheers!
North American came from Siberia/central Asia.
Same religion, similar languages.
South Americans came from near Morocco
Australasians came from near Philippines as there was small iselands
I am pretty sure that Scientist guy who came up with the "Homo Erectus" name was just kidding with us.
The predominant cryptocurrency btc hits $100k by Dec. Start investing in cryptocurrencies for more for the future.
From the Mountains of Altai, some of them moved East towards Americas, and sum moved West and became Turkic.
Siberia is a bit further north.
Yup, Paleoindian and early European share a common ancestor, closely related to the Mal'ta people who at one point lived around lake Baikal and the Altai
My dad's co-worker was native and said he looks exactly just like his brother! We're Asians btw!
Natives originated from India and China.
@Asiama Pachuau Few thousand years ago maybe. Some natives look more Indian and some look more Chinese. Mongolia is a mix.
@Kim Bim Prove me wrong.
@Kim Bim I did. You are the one claiming I am wrong. Show me how.
@Kim Bim You are immature. Prove your claim.
My neighbour was a Neanderthal but whenever he'd see my sister he would turn into a homo erectus.
That basically sums up the entire evolution theory.
Protohistoric, prehistoric and ancient Negritic Africans were masters of the lands as well as the oceans. They were the first shipbuilders on earth and had to have used watercraft to cross from South East Asia to Australia about 60,000 years ago and from the West Africa/Sahara inland seas region to the Americas. The fact of the northern portion of Africa now known as a vast desert wasteland being a place of large lakes, rivers and fertile regions with the most ancient of civilizations is a fact that has been verified, (see African Presence in Early America, edt. Ivan Van Sertima and Runoko Rashidi, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ "The Principle of Polarity," by Wayne Chandler: 1994.)
From that region of Africa as well as East Africa, diffusions of Blacks towards the Americas as early as 30,000 B.C. are believed to have occurred based on findings in a region from Mexico to Brazil which show that American Indians in the region include Negritic types (eg. Olmecs, Afro-Darienite, Black Californians, Chuarras, Garifuna's and others). Much earlier journeys occurred by land sometime before 75,000 B.C. according to the Gladwin Thesis written by C.S. Gladwin. This migration occurred on the Pacific side of the Americas and was began by Africans with Affinities similar to the people of New Guinea, Tasmania, Solomon Islands and Australia. The earliest migrations of African Blacks through Asia then to the Americas seemed to have occurred exactly during the period that the Australian Aborigines and the proto-African ancestors of the Aborigines, Oceanic Negroids (Fijians, Solomon Islanders, Papua-New Guineans, and so on) and other Blacks spread throughout East Asia and the Pacific Islands about one hundred thousand years ago. The fact that these same Blacks are still among the world's seafaring cultures and still regard the sea as sacred and as a place of sustenance is evidence of their ancient dependence on the sea for travel and exploration as well as for commerce and trade. Therefore, they would have had to build sea-worthy ships and boats to take them across the vast expanses of ocean, including the Atlantic, Indian Ocean (both the Atlantic and Indian Oceans were called the Ethiopian Sea, in the Middle Ages) and the Pacific Ocean.
Fact. Africans sailed here bf any other civilization. The Dogon to be exact whom are Aboriginal to the Americas
im from south east asian, yes that is the truth.. we cant miss america its too big.
that sounds Iike something you wouId hear from those fake history channeIs, that teII fairytaIes... have you ever seen this photo named 'A Kroomen, an African SaiIor' from "dr imhotep" www.sciencesource.com/archive/-SS2913715.html
the oIdest skuII ever found of a modern 'negroid' is onIy 6,4OO Years 0Id... the ancestors of african americans are centraI & west african bantus, which are not reIated to austraIoids, austronesians, capoids, nubians etc...
west africans arrived in the americas more than 4OO year ago & before that, the arabs were ensIaving them... in which started in the 7th century (year 601) and Iasted for more than a 1OOO years... hence african americans being brown & not bIack www.theroot.com/exactly-how-black-is-black-america-1790895185
DNA resuIts from the aImost 1O,OOO year oId kennewick man, showed he was an american 'indian'
fox41yakima.com/unexpected-dna-link-man-shares-paternal-haplogroup-with-kennewick-man/
which makes sense, when you see this fuII bIooded american 'indian'
en.academic.ru/pictures/enwiki/77/Mosy_Higgins_Maidu_man_age_27_American_Indian_Northern_California.png
aIso from the DNA resuIts of Iuzia, it showed she was amerindian...
www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-11/fda-tnf110918.php
and from the DNA resuIts of the capoids/khoisan, it shows they have 14 to 4O% western eurasian DNA...
www.newscientist.com/article/dn24988-humanitys-forgotten-return-to-africa-revealed-in-dna/
Check these OImecs...
ruclips.net/video/g0Fp492w7x4/видео.htmlm38s
Watch the OImec taIking
ruclips.net/video/3slGpsTqn_8/видео.htmlm2s
People started out in Ethiopia and Somalia so I would like a video on that topic covering the various races we have today compared to the beginning. Another topic is hair and skin from that same region, how did we end up with such diversity? It doesn’t seem that should be but here we are.
No they didn't. Blacks started in Mesopotamia. First black civilization.
Black people been everywhere
I’m curious to know how is it that ancient civilizations like the Babylonians, Egyptians, Greeks and others kept records that we have been able to discover thousands of years later regarding their culture and history but yet we never hear about such records from the Native American tribes. Or perhaps there are records and I am not aware of and have not been able to find anywhere in my research. Wouldn’t this explain more about their migrations patterns and how they got along or didn’t get along with other tribes? I would like a Native American with this knowledge to make a video or perhaps comment as to where I can find this information. I am always fascinated by ancient history and this is one that interests me
All our knowledge is passed orally. There are a few birch bark scrolls that remain but they are held by individuals within their respective communities. Much of our knowledge is closed practice. That's why a lot can not be found on the internet.
@@lauralindsay4227 'Stories'' get exaggerated big time. You are mixed-race... as is most of America... no people are Indigenous. None.
native Americans didn’t have horses that explains a lot too
@@lauralindsay4227can you share some of the oral history?
im mixed, from sinaloa mexico, in ancient times our people settled from south arizona, through sonora and the north of sinaloa.
They crossed the Pacific ocean bro
I am curious, not so much of origin, but development of culture. I was told once that most of the artifacts from civilizations in the South are actually much older than the ones found in the North/Bering Srait land mass, and if so, wouldn't it throw the geography off a bit? Can anyone expound?
There are only a couple sites that hold up to scrutiny, but they are still considered outliers. Google around for the Monte Verde sites. Those are the strongest sites that throw off the currently accepted model of peopling of America. But again, they are outliers and are vastly outnumbered by the sites that support the current North to South theory.
American Archeology is an awesome and fascinating field and it is definitely still changing as new discoveries are made!
Tl;dr: There are a couple sites in South America that don't fit the current timeline, but they don't provide enough evidence to debunk the currently accepted model.
iboism thank you. I will check into that. American archeology is so awesome, but there us still so much that we don't know.
My theory. The first to arrive in America were either of Polynesian or Australoid descent landing off the coast of modern day peru and traveling up north mixing with those who crossed via the Bering strait bridge.
Natives are older than Polynesian, they are the youngest civilization but Easter island is not far from Venezuela.
in 2021 - human footprints discovered in the White Sands Nat'l Park in New Mexico have been dated to 21 to 23,000 cal years BP - based on carbon dating seeds in the stratigraphy - - clovis first has been busted - and that puts Monte Verde's 14,500 cal years BP easily within range - especially of coastal migration
This really answered my main question about the natives
si Markeyan Asia is a rather broad term when referring to the origin of the first native Americans.
si Markeyan lucky for us, we base our knowledge on science and not biases that all people are equally culpable of. The mtdna of all native Americans clearly demonstrate a relation to one another. I think what most people seem to not understand when it comes to similar physical appearances of people, is that convergent evolution is very much a thing.
I’m fully aware that the dna shows native Americans come from Asia, but that’s also quite some time ago. Yes there is some evidence of recent genetic admixture of Polynesian, but not in North America. Arguing that just because something appears so must make it so, is just wrong. That’s the same argument of afrocentrists who say that wide noses are exclusive to Africa, while I know, and I’m sure you know, that wide nose are found through out the world, in warm tropical zones.
You are stereotyping people that you have never met. I haven’t been to Asia in 20 years, but last time, I specifically remember looking at how some locals reminded me of the Maya in Central America. That does not mean that every Native American looks the same. That holds true for individuals as much as a population group. There are so many reasons that appearance may change in a population. Clearly dna is foremost, but food, environment, physical activity all play a part in appearance. As Native American groups moved throughout the continents, there were bound to be changes in appearance. The Inuit and Aleut are related to the rest of the native Americans.
My comment about Asia refers to your generalizing by using a broad term of Asian. It’s clear that native Americans are descendants of Asians from the Siberia in the north, dna says as much.
The ancient "Siberians" are not what like 95% of you think. They belonged to a group called ANE or Ancient North Eurasian. A group that lead to some European groups and some Asian Groups as well. The Siberians as we know them today arrived much later from the south. Four thousand years ago if I remember correctly. That group came to North America around 1000 years ago and makes up our most northern Amerindians tribes. 23,000 years ago is a decent ballpark for ANE migration, and they really looked nothing like Asians, Europeans, or Amerindians. Kennewick man is 9-10k old, 13,000 years removed from migration and he still has a hodgepodge of features which is why after facial reconstruction he was still so hard to place. It was just, really, that one group, ANE, in the early migrations that led to essentially 3 different populations around the world, taylor made for their habitats after thousands of years. Not all Europeans have ANE and not all Asians have ANE but all the non northern Amerindians have ANE
When how and why did marriage start. And why do most cultures have it in some way and why is it so important?
dogs101o because strong family bonds and units are the backbone of all successful cultures which is exactly why the Democrat communist want to ruin families in America because it will precipitate the fall of America and I'm not going to stand by for that s***
Marriage started when a girl figured out the best way to get even with a guy was to stay with him for life.
Amazing! Austro-Melanesian DNA found in some native Amerindian groups. Check out study by Skoglund and Reich (2016) They found that DNA of living and ancient peoples was detected in modern Amerindians that linked them to native peoples from Australasia and Melanesia. This Australasian/Melanesian admixture was found in living Native Americans, such as Aleutian Islanders and the Surui people of Amazonian Brazil.
Come on, the point of the coming new mainstream Orthodoxy is that white people really don't have a place anywhere. That is what they are doing.
Did they really need a bridge? Even if it wasn’t there, they could have rowed their way across, just like Polynesians. 🤷🏻♂️
That’s actually a theory
Polynesian is just a word the white man came up with. Pacific Islanders were once 1
It’s not even real
Chinese and Mongolians had larger fleets than Spanish Armada so could have done it with more than just rowing boats.
back then no body was smart enough to make a boat to roll across, everybody moved by foot
I am a descendant from Taínos. 💪😎
This theory was well established years before DNA was invented.
It was, but DNA has proven some of this is not true.
Jim Churchill Dna wasn’t invented...
@@NubiansNapata Can't... ;-)
This was actually the clearest and put together piece I’ve heard on this topic I been searching 🙏🏽
First nation Canadian here. when i went to japan i don't know if it was because of factors beyond my knowledge but a lot f the people there assumed i was Chinese / Japanese. im of course 186CM (6.1) height is what gave me away from not being from either of the country's. We do share a few similarities
I have a question. Why are the first Americans called Native American? Shouldn’t they just be called American? Any foreigner would be African American, Asian American, euro American, etc. No?
It's a term from a historical perspective. They are considered native relative to the humans that would come later (in the case of the US these were mostly Europeans). Presently, anyone born in the US would and should identify as "American". Obviously, some Americans choose to identify with hyphenated versions of whatever they please.
You are never foreign to your own homeland.
@@davidjack7418 Well, there's another issue there. America is a rather loose term. South vs North and then Canadians have never wanted to be mistaken as someone from USA. So, if we are to bicker over semantics, "Americans" should be called statesmen or something to that effect. If anyone could identify as an american I suppose it would only be First Nations/Natives.
I am proud to have Native American and therefore mongoloid dna. I don’t know why some people think it’s shameful or foreign that they come from Asia. It’s really sad.
we all need to come together as one we all bleed the same
'They' can't claim superiority, indigenous status, if they were immigrants as well... Human condition...
So we lost huge land bridges to water and how did this happen? Ice caps melting?
The temperature is cyclical.
now really? we all know it was the cars they drove over the land bridge just ask Greta thumberg!
Or maybe we all come from PANGEA the super continent.
Bruh
You are right it was only one land there wasn't African or American yes one super continent that belong to all of us.
Pangea spilt 200 million years ago. Humans evolved 300k-200k years ago.
@@vtron9832 Can't have any fun without you RWE's, Right Wing Extremists, bringing up facts and reality :-)
Davram Bashere excuse me. I’m very far left myself, bringing up facts.
The first Americans came from Europe.We made America what it
Is today.
True I agree origins of americans are South Korean,Europeans
I think they're referring to who was on the Americas first...
@@KlezHistory south korea?? 😂😂 u must be stupid
@@NubiansNapata The Europeans were the very first they we're no others like some think.
@@leefrancis4565 well you're daft if u think that
We have Indian artifacts found in america and north america older than the beiran straight never say Indians migrated from Asia
Kainai Warrior8 How old is the Berin Strait??
The lost Ancient humans of Antarctica 🇦🇶
That would have to be a race between the Fuegians of the southern tip of South America or Tasmanian Aboriginals
Never believe What nobodyTells you look it up for yourself
why everyone be racist when in reality we are all colonial Africans
Do you realize that by saying we are all “colonial Africans,” you infer that all of us are from Africa during the European age of colonization.
I would love to know what it looked like in America 3000 years ago... what did the people look like
It looked like Papua New Guinea
Look up the seri or originally know as the comcaac. Our group has been isolated on our land and islands for several thousand years with a unique language compared to all the other nations of America. My grandpa and others in our nations are dark skined, black hair, and some have wider noses. I'm mixed hence my lighter skin but my people would probably sum up what the original indigenous looked like
@@GabeQuihuis-Meza I’m gonna look that up thank you
@@selendriamuganogo7077 Of course
Black Africans roots blacks were here first they have stones of Africans expressions
Oh and by the way all the different Indian tribes in America were Hebrews and they all yes I said all spoke the hebrew language. Europeans have been lying and suppressing this history for years.
That can’t be when the majority of archaeologists are no longer white. You also ignore the other disciplines such as biology, forensics, and genetics that seemingly contradict your view.
That's just some pseudoscientific mormon bullshit, Native Americans had never even heard of Hebrews till the Europeans came
Being 1/3 Native American (and a whole bunch of other stuff) I was just in Asia and everyone thought I was part asian usually, Chinese or Filipino 😆 I mean I guess they’re not technically wrong!
You are our lost adventureous cousins that went exploring the Americas. Asia is your home too, welcome back.
Amazing ! 🥴
I met a cherokee who thinks the land bridge is just a theory, and "The land bridge, thats just a theory, but thats not how we got here"
I agree just a theory.
We don't know for "fact" that man walked out of Ethiopia-it may be the prevailing theory of the time but far from settled
JUST IGNORE THE OLDEST MUMMIES IN AMERICA THEN. EXPLAIN CLOVIS.
I know right, ignore the Olmec's, or skraelings. These assholes love to alter history to cover up the fact that we would kick half of the out and imprison the other half for war crimes against humanity!!!
You gotta love how they choose actors over scientist's to spew their bullshit. "Native Indians" aka Amerinds have only been on this continent for 8,000 years!!!
Sterlin Walker Natives were most likely the first ones here though as new evidence supports this.
Whites still were NOT here first.
And don't bring up that dumb solutrean hypothesis crap as your argument I allready proved someone wrong about that hypothesis.
Mad Mark Clovis is of Asian descent.
Sterlin Walker Anzick boy who was 12,500 years old was native american not European not black.
Naia who was oldest ever found was around 13,500 to 14,000 years old she was proven to be native american not European,not black.
If you look up the shaindong project they found many stone tools in Asia that look just like the ones found in north america. That have that same flint style.
There have been stone tools found in north america to be as old as 50,000 years old.
If this is true this puts Asians in north america 50,000 years ago.
Sterlin Walker Olmecs were not black.
I have a question for you. How astronauts in the ISS keep track of their weight if they cannot use a balance to do so. Love your show!
New DNA tests reveal that native Americans and Europeans have common ancestors called Eurasians that even preceded the Asians who were supposed to have crossed into the Americas through Bering strait. These Eurasians made the long journey to the Americas through the central Asia, east Asia, the Bering strait into the Americas.
amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.theguardian.com/science/2018/feb/21/rejecting-the-solutrean-hypothesis-the-first-peoples-in-the-americas-were-not-from-europe?amp_js_v=a2&_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCCAE%3D#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&_tf=From%20%251%24s&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fscience%2F2018%2Ffeb%2F21%2Frejecting-the-solutrean-hypothesis-the-first-peoples-in-the-americas-were-not-from-europe
Wrong the solutrean hypothesis has been proven wrong.The DNA X which is used for connection between whites and natives is wrong X is more of a Siberian connection.Whites were not here first.
@@rjjameson1439 The race question is always a vexing interference and throws any discovery off balance. The color or pigmentation is, I believe, a phenomenon, which came into being only 10,000 years ago. There is nothing called a "pure" race in the world today. Racism is only for the ignorant and insecure people. Humans are mixed and are continuously mixing. 15,000 year ago, a population living in northern Eurasia was not the primary ancestral population of the present-day inhabitants of the region.Some from this people migrated across Siberia and contributed to the people that crossed the Bering land bridge and gave rise to Native Americans. THEY ARE NOT NECESSARILY WHITE EUROPEANS. Others migrated to the west and contributed to the Europeans. The ancient north Eurasians would have been called a "race" had they lived today, as they must have been genetically about as differentiated from all other European populations who lived at the time as today's West Eurasians, native Americans and east Asians are from one another.
@@vineethjoshy4819 Natives were here first end of story they did not come from Europe there are to many problems with the Solutrean hypothesis.
But I appreciate your opinion.
Native Americans and all other tribes living in this Hemisphere have always been here, they developed over the decades as a independent human race, the land bridge theory is just that, "A Theory"!!
Anyone born here IS Native American. No people are indigenous.
Very True!!!!
13,000 years? How do you explain Monte Verde in chile caarbon and other dated (Tom Dillehay) at 14,000+ years, Meadowcroft cave about the same. Maya DNA has been raced to Lake Baikal in souther Siberia.
I am a firm believer of the land bridge from Asia to North America and that it enabled people to migrate from Asia to North and Central America. This occurred during the height of the last great ice age when glaciers covered a large portion of what is now Canada and down into the northern part of the United States. What I would like to know is if there was a land bridge from Asia to North America, was there also a land bridge from Europe across what is now the northern Atlantic? There is some evidence of tools found in northeastern United States and the eastern provinces of Canada. Have any of those fossils been dated and could we have had Europeans as well as Asians making up the first Americans?
The only thing keeping the world from basically having a super continent is sea levels.
No land bridge from Europe, but an ice bridge. Also pretty easy sailing from Africa to the Americas. There are no confirmed Solutrean tools in the Americas, but it is possible there is a connection.
@@nmarbletoe8210 I can find that easy to agree with. The north, polar ice was very large and far reaching. As for the sea passage from Africa to the western hemisphere being an easy one....I have my doubts. So little in the way of evidence. I'm sure those African people living on the western side of the continent might have had written language that was familiar to them, but when they were exploited for human slaves, the people retreated into the interior.
Slavers and dealers in human slaves would have destroyed any documentation of the people there. The only history then, would be oral and passed down from surviving generations. It's sad to think of how many people with great potential, vanished and there is little known.
This so interesting. Crazy the journey these groups made. Just walking through out generations not knowing where to go. The weather, Illness, food gathering just fascinating how these people did it.