What a contrast to all the milquetoast interpretations we are being fed nowadays. They all lack the internal life, the self-explanatory truth, the sense of inspiration that every score Richter touched is blessed with.
Your words are the right ones to characterisise this unique artist (like Arthur Rubinstein and Glenn Gould did it). Do You also know how Nikolai Luganski did describe it? He said, Svlatoslav Richters kind of playing piano was "hypnotical"...
It is nice for me to read Your words, too. Really it seems that there is a true connection between these both artists of the piano - true poets on the their instruments. - This live record surely is an especially good example for Richter´s historically single playing (You can recognize it in the mirror of the fascinated faces of the hearers in the Pushkin Museum). As to Lugansky we may be curious for his further development until he will be in the same age like his idol...
Mit einer der schönsten Aufnahmen des Pianisten insgesamt. Ergreifend auch die Anteilnahme des Moskauer Publikums - ein großes Danke an den meisterlichen technischen Aufnahmestab!
Philips published an astonishing rendition from this op.109, a concert in the Netherlands. This version is heartfelt too. The music is intriguing and Richter is fascinating.
Superb, as always. I’ve just realised something - he’s playing in normal lighting instead of that little lamp he used in his final years - can anyone explain this?
Vergesst alle Lang Lang's dieser Welt! Richter ist vielleicht der größte Pianist oder Musiker des 20. Jahrhunderts, der bis heute in das 21. Jahrhundert strahlt.
I dont understand how he can do this while using sheet music. But still clearly connecting so much to the music, it sounds as if he has memorised it but he clearly hasn't
Peter Von Berg I mentioned in the info box that the picture shows Dmitri Zhuravlyov - ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Журавлёв,_Дмитрий_Николаевич I agree with you about Richter
Wiedereinmal scheinen Interpret und Komponist e i n s zu sein. Richter setzt damit die Linie Solomon, Serkin fort - auf die vielleicht einmal Nikolai Luganski einschwenken wird...
Are people seriously watching or hearing the same thing? This is very off. At least the first movement, random tempo, missed notes, dynamics?? I think himself would agree
+kinkokonko I have no idea what you are speaking about. What you consider random tempo is exactly what is written in the scores. This Beethoven sonata is the first and only one where the first theme and the second theme are to be played in very different tempi. Personally, I am quite surprised, how much dynamics he put in the medium part of the first movement. This part is generally to be played all in piano except for the sforzati. It is quite difficult not to get carried away and land in forte too early. About missing notes I have stopped to complain. I am wondering how you play this sonata. Do you have a recording here on youtube?
+Hans Hartmann so to comment on Music one must be and instrument or of such? I play I am not great .... Listen to Barenboim , Schiff Its too slow and bloody sentimental for a Russian ... God Blees :) come on ... it takes 4 bars to re type this shite comment and he is not on variation one. oh now ....
1st movement he played well but like Richter always do play to hard and fast you miss the thrill.pollini version is the only one who play it good on the all youtube version.
Fantastic! He knows the ins and outs of this beautiful sonata and gives all of it to us. So masterful.
What a Splendid rendition and performance.. i think he has endless passion for music and pure soul.. the great person !
What a contrast to all the milquetoast interpretations we are being fed nowadays. They all lack the internal life, the self-explanatory truth, the sense of inspiration that every score Richter touched is blessed with.
Your words are the right ones to characterisise this unique artist (like Arthur Rubinstein and Glenn Gould did it). Do You also know how Nikolai Luganski did describe it? He said, Svlatoslav Richters kind of playing piano was "hypnotical"...
@@wolfgangklofat594 thank you for the kind words; I really admire Mr Luganski as well; he is a true artist and a poet
It is nice for me to read Your words, too. Really it seems that there is a true connection between these both artists of the piano - true poets on the their instruments. - This live record surely is an especially good example for Richter´s historically single playing (You can recognize it in the mirror of the fascinated faces of the hearers in the Pushkin Museum). As to Lugansky we may be curious for his further development until he will be in the same age like his idol...
Un GRANDISSIMO pianista nella storia del pianismo.
Interpretazione bellissima. Grande intensità emotiva, sonorità straordinaria.
Mit einer der schönsten Aufnahmen des Pianisten insgesamt. Ergreifend auch die Anteilnahme des Moskauer Publikums - ein großes Danke an den meisterlichen technischen Aufnahmestab!
Thanks for sharing this jewel
Philips published an astonishing rendition from this op.109, a concert in the Netherlands. This version is heartfelt too. The music is intriguing and Richter is fascinating.
Grazie Maestro
Очень вдохновенно играет, уважаю Рихтера и люблю его исполнение. Спасибо Вам за Музыку.
Richters und Beethovens Spätstil kommen zusammen!
The sound of the late Richter was incredibly rich and deep. Perfect for those late Beethoven sonatas.
Wirklich ????????? Diese ewige strerile und skurrile Mezzoforte überall .... ich finde das mehr Blei am Arsch statt Morgenstunde hat Gold im Munde
Great performance.
이 아침 스비아토 슬라프 리히터의 연주로 하루를 엽니다. 내가 좋아하는 이 분의 연주를 듣는것은 행복입니다. 페이지 터너가 악보를 넘겨 주는 것 까지 원더플이군요.💟
Richter somehow bypasses the part of the mind that tells itself, "this is a piano", thereby allowing the listener to hear what is actually happening
A Titan of the piano. Listen to his rendering of the same sonata in Leipzig in 1963 and you will be even more astonished.
Richter in Leipzig 1963 is probably my favourite recital ever
@@ADGO I am more or less of your same idea 🙂 ... One word to describe it: unbelievable.
The God of piano.
Je me sens bien avec lui.
00:13 Primer movimiento
03:44 Segundo movimiento
06:21 Tercer movimiento
Gracias por la información!
simplement quand deux génies se rencontrent...simply when two genius meet each over...
Декабрьские вечера, 8/12/1991. Haydn Sonate Nr. 33, Beethoven op. 109, op. 110
Как дивет Святослав не на Родине, а по твоей прописке.Покажи ему паспорт и обеспечь спокойно.❤
❤️
Superb, as always. I’ve just realised something - he’s playing in normal lighting instead of that little lamp he used in his final years - can anyone explain this?
Vergesst alle Lang Lang's dieser Welt! Richter ist vielleicht der größte Pianist oder Musiker des 20. Jahrhunderts, der bis heute in das 21. Jahrhundert strahlt.
I dont understand how he can do this while using sheet music. But still clearly connecting so much to the music, it sounds as if he has memorised it but he clearly hasn't
He had it memorised - he knew it most of his life most likely. Only later in life did he begin to play with the music in front of him again.
Do you know the exact date of this beautiful performance?
Gorgeous playing, and such a beautiful sound. Does anyone know whose picture it is that's displayed up on the stage ?
Peter Von Berg I mentioned in the info box that the picture shows Dmitri Zhuravlyov - ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Журавлёв,_Дмитрий_Николаевич I agree with you about Richter
The audiences members trying to experience the genius of richter when it was all but spent
quinto34
this is another one,uploaded last month.
3:43
Wiedereinmal scheinen Interpret und Komponist e i n s zu sein. Richter setzt damit die Linie Solomon, Serkin fort - auf die vielleicht einmal Nikolai Luganski einschwenken wird...
Rather heavy, he was a bit old when he played this
Gloria Hey Richter's Beethoven was always "heavy". Yet, it was articulate. Beethoven needs to be so, which Richter achieved.
My ears sure don't hear this work played by Richter as being as being in any way heavy.
Are people seriously watching or hearing the same thing?
This is very off. At least the first movement, random tempo, missed notes, dynamics??
I think himself would agree
+kinkokonko I have no idea what you are speaking about. What you consider random tempo is exactly what is written in the scores. This Beethoven sonata is the first and only one where the first theme and the second theme are to be played in very different tempi. Personally, I am quite surprised, how much dynamics he put in the medium part of the first movement. This part is generally to be played all in piano except for the sforzati. It is quite difficult not to get carried away and land in forte too early. About missing notes I have stopped to complain. I am wondering how you play this sonata. Do you have a recording here on youtube?
+Hans Hartmann so to comment on Music one must be and instrument or of such? I play I am not great ....
Listen to Barenboim , Schiff
Its too slow and bloody sentimental for a Russian ... God Blees :) come on ... it takes 4 bars to re type this shite comment
and he is not on variation one. oh now ....
@@kinkokonko 0_0 lol
very rough, like Russia
1st movement he played well but like Richter always do play to hard and fast you miss the thrill.pollini version is the only one who play it good on the all youtube version.
Or just check out Richter in Leipzig on youtube in which he played all the 3 late sonatas with full virtuosity.
Jubee Tobbe Pollini isn't even close to Richter.
@@leomiller2291 Visa versa. This's pitiful performance by SR
@@esfirross6800 why is it pitiful?
Richter started playing from the music after a memory lapse playing Liszt.
Who looks more miserable, Richter or the old gal turning the pages?
They look miserable?
It would be better for You to listen to and to hear the wonderful music instead of superficially looking to the artist and his assistant.
@@wolfgangklofat594 look both at music and artist