The Soviet super tank that defeated Germany - KV-6
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 31 мар 2024
- The Nazi Super Tank: • Nazi Super Tank - P-10...
3d model here: sketchfab.com/3d-models/kv-6-...
Merch Store!
www.foundandexplained.shop
NEW CHANNEL:
• Launched from the bigg...
Discord: / discord
My News Channel: / @aviationstationyt
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @foundandexplained
Patreon:
/ foundandexplained
![Nazi Super Tank - P-1000 Ratte - [ Largest Tank EVER ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6mfhalEjUrw/mqdefault.jpg)
![Nazi Super Tank - P-1000 Ratte - [ Largest Tank EVER ]](/img/tr.png)
First
thats a sad pin
@@the-je6zn nuh-uh
Note to the script writer it is described as a "hull down position" a " turret down position " is an upsidedown tank common in Australia obviously. 🤗
Last
Have a cupcake. 🧁
The engine: "Im tired boss..."
Weight: I'm even more tired
True
The transmission: *Incomprehensible agonized screeching*
Don't you mean " comrade " ?
_You get tired when I give you the permission to get tired comrade_
- Soviet Commissar (with a *thicc* Russian accent)
Stalin and Hitler having a whose is bigger contest.
Oh the irony...
Squire Hitler: "A ton for every year of the Reich!"
"Oh, I thought you wanted a heavy tank."
@@joshuabessire9169 = 13 tons - a few months. Madman says "is that it?"
Its not even a contest bro...
Ever heard of the P1000?
The Germans actually won that race with a tank so big it could barely move at 1kmperhour speed when it was no breaking.... 😂
Happy 1st of April!
Love that you put 3D modeling effort into it. The model looks amazing!
@@Rob_F8F what do you mean? this tank is real..
Too you as well!!!
same
Exactly, as Stalin negatively referred to a five turret tank as a department store...
Not to mention that a tank this long would frequently throw its tracks off just in testing, assuming that an engine(s) & gearbox(s) could be designed to produce or handle that much torque in the first place...
Engineer: Don't fire all at once from the same side.
Commander: 5:23
"Can't fire at each other, can't fire all from the same side... what good is this tank for?"
@@etsequentia6765 Anti-air, apparently.
And here I thought the definitely tested and produced, no cap, on god P.1000 Ratte was a testament to engineering insanity.
The difference is that someone actually considered the Ratte, while this "KV-6" is 100% fake.
it gets worse. apparently there was on idea/plan to put the 800mm railway artillary gun on the ratte and would weigh in a low 1500 tons
@@promptedleek4829 Nah, the version with the SUPERBIG gun was estimated to be even heavier.
Because the Schwerer Gustav 80cm railway cannon already weighed in at 1350 ton.
That's with zero armor, zero propulsion, zero nothing beyond minimal requirements as a railroad mobile cannon lavette.
The "1000" in the name is actually the estimated weight in tons.
But same as with the E-series tanks being developed, there was quite some variation.
The E-50 for example would likely have been in the 60-70t range if serialproduced.
Fun fact: KV-6 actually existed and was produced in little series, but it was not a land battleship, but standard KV-1, just with flamethrower instead of coax machine gun
Pretty sure the tank your talking about is the KV-8 not 6
It is the KV-8/KV-8S you're talking about.
@@tonk4866 KV-6 This vehicle was a flamethrower variant. At least four were used in the battle of Leningrad. It is not to be confused with the fictional KV-VI super heavy tank, built by modeler Brian Fowler in 1995.
KV-8 (102) - A KV-1 fitted with the ATO-41 flamethrower in the turret, beside a machine gun.[citation needed] In order to accommodate the new weapon, the 76.2 mm gun was replaced with a smaller 45 mm gun M1932, though it was disguised to look like the standard 76 mm (the cannon was placed inside a 76 mm tube).
KV-8S (35) - The same as KV-8 but based on KV-1S. Equipped with ATO-42 flamethrower (improved version of ATO-41).[28] The smaller turret of the KV-1S caused space limitations, so 25 of the KV-8S had the original KV-8 turret mated to the KV-1S hull, while the remaining 10 had a KV-1S turret with ATO-42 flamethrower but lacked the coaxial machine gun.
KV-8M - Upgraded version of KV-8S. Equipped with two flamethrowers. Two prototypes were constructed.
@@petergray2712 KV-6 This vehicle was a flamethrower variant. At least four were used in the battle of Leningrad. It is not to be confused with the fictional KV-VI super heavy tank, built by modeler Brian Fowler in 1995.
KV-8 (102) - A KV-1 fitted with the ATO-41 flamethrower in the turret, beside a machine gun.[citation needed] In order to accommodate the new weapon, the 76.2 mm gun was replaced with a smaller 45 mm gun M1932, though it was disguised to look like the standard 76 mm (the cannon was placed inside a 76 mm tube).
KV-8S (35) - The same as KV-8 but based on KV-1S. Equipped with ATO-42 flamethrower (improved version of ATO-41).[28] The smaller turret of the KV-1S caused space limitations, so 25 of the KV-8S had the original KV-8 turret mated to the KV-1S hull, while the remaining 10 had a KV-1S turret with ATO-42 flamethrower but lacked the coaxial machine gun.
KV-8M - Upgraded version of KV-8S. Equipped with two flamethrowers. Two prototypes were constructed.
Funner fact: there were SEVERAL KV-6 including one that tested the electric engines captured from the Ferdinand Porch tanks in the battle of kursk.
If it would have ever existed, it would make the Tiger II look like the most reliable and Fuel efficient Tank of the entire War!
What a tiny tank. Very stealthy 😅
I do like that 3 days ago i did stealth tanks, and now i do "anti-stealth tanks"
@@FoundAndExplained😅
@@FoundAndExplainedMaybe flying tanks would be also interesting
@@Tanks_and_Frog They have a video on that too.
@@Tanks_and_Frog it was already done. Twice in fact. First the A-40 then the Ku-6
World of Tanks devs are drooling.
Keep an eye out for the next update! 😂
Warthunder: meh already have this
@@ALV694fr
Nah, they’ll come out with anothet molot variant
WoT doesn't allow the use of multiple turrets. This would be like the Japanese super heavies with the frontal turrets that just restrict your gun depression.
Imagine trying to steer that monstrosity.
"It doesn't need to steer, it's going straight to Berlin!" - Stalin
"Give me 40 acres and I'll turn this rig around"!
That's neat part, you don't
Just finnished watching the video, can't believe I fell for this
Sweddised
Wow....this tank will feel right at home in Warhammer 4000
The emperor protects
When your planet can't even afford to build Macharius heavy tanks so you are forced to improvise
3:55 "16 horsepower"... damn that's a lotta powwwer
Maybe very very big horses?
Maybe a stallionpower!
@@kearsargeyt8848you mean stalinium power !
I have the slight feeling it wasn't very fast.
Imagine the crew being oh boy how we are going to get over that mountain.
Plus the lufftwaffe would be like oh goodie lets have a party boys.
3:53 a 16 horsepower engine?! That would certainly have been impressive 😅 Really enjoyed this one, thank you FAE!
I'm not sure I want to know the gear ratio.
I’m sad to find out it could not fly.
they're too heavy.
It couldn't fly but it was amphibious. It could even be used as a submarine.
@@ddegn tank Submarine is not a thing there's no anyone could made idea about tank Submarine
@@Ryuu1010YT Dude, your exposing your military equipment ignorance. How do you think the Japanese were able to sink so many ships in Pearl Harbor? They used tank submarines. The Chinese have a whole fleet of submarine tanks in preparation to invade Taiwan.
Even George Washington used a tank submarine to cross the Delaware River. The famous picture took artistic license and put Washington in a boat because it looked better than trying to depict a bunch of soldiers in submarine tank. George Washington's submarine tank is probably the most famous submarine tank there is.
Don't get me started about the importance of submarine tanks in the US Civil War. I could go on about those submarine tanks for hours.
Don't try to tell me there aren't any submarine tanks.
@@ddegn I was never heard about Submarine tanks I never thought that's a thing
My Grandfather drove one of these during the war when he got conscripted into the Spanish army.
Finest, most honorable man I ever knew.
Why bud lying😭
@@BrickGuy_Mpg Shhhhh, don't make the bait obvious to the stupid ones!
Nah you're the one lying SUNNY infact I still have the selfie of me with him in the tank!
@@ChannelFish279 Gramma has that selfie in a locket around her neck to this day!
@@M0vingSaturn523I think he was the stupid one
Can you take a look at Shuman Superdreadnought, a colossal land battleship designed by Frank Shuman during the inter-war period? It looks like a tsar tank, just ten times bigger.
A yes the hero tank of certain web animations
i saw this when i was teeenager watching gerand and tanktoons.
Do you want a tank or a train?
Stalin: Да
One thing that always gets me whenever I see this tank is that a burst of machine gun fire, maybe even from a submachine gun, could cause massive damage simply by blowing up the Katyusha rockets if they haven’t been fired
When you put too much firepower but low to no mobility in tank creation
HANS THE SOVIETS HAVE A BATTLE SHIP (Hans): but we’re like 50 kilometers from any body of water able to have a battleship in it
IT HAS WHEELS
You would just command it like a battleship, the commander would just focus on positioning and the main turret, the secondary armament would have its own commanders to chose targets
Funnily enough, I read, that KV-series were derivates of unsucessful prototype SMK (If I recall correctly) which was said to have longer threads than KV1 with two towers-the smaller one becoming the tower for KV1 in the end
And i thought the Maus was ridiculous.
The enemy has been re inforced by a behemoth
I hear him crack a smile when he talks about the BT-5 turret during the exploded view. 😄
if you look more, its kinda like an armored train with track
I would love to see more armored fighting videos from you, they’re pretty fun to watch.
If it was real and actually good that shit would be terrifying
In all honesty something like this would have probably worked better as the Soviet version of the Maginot Line
As a kit basher of model kits this one has been on the will do one day list for awhile now. Be saving this clip for future reference cheers
If you think its crazy for a vehicle that heavy to float you should see a battle ship!
When dictators think that they know everything and after proven wrong nobody will dare to say anything.
This would actually work if it only had 2 main turrets that never crossed fire. Two smaller turrets with machine guns could sit in the gap between the main turrets, facing outwards.
I feel like I’ve entered a alternate universe today
KV-6
2 KV-1 Turrets (76.2mm)
Double 1 KV-2 Turret (152mm)
BT-5 Turret (45mm)
Double 14.5mm Autocannon
Machine guns
Katyusha rockets
Sir please make video on
🔴 bartini USSR ground effective aircraft carrier that carrier fighter jets
🔴 crysler tv 8
🔴German giraffe tank concept
🔴 soviet Union mig 105 space fighter jet to destroy satellite
🔴 project habakkuk ice aircraft carrier
He made a video about the Bartini ground effect craft. It should be in his channel. About the others I don't know. But look for the proposed submarine aircraft carriers. They're a doozy.
Hey man, I love your videos
Now I wish this tank was real...
well it's real, this video said so, smh.
it would be impossible unless ompa loompas were manning the tank
@@flamingpotato8906it actually wasnt
@@flamingpotato8906its a kitbash of some old modelling kits, wasnt even drawn up by the soviets
r/wooooooooooosh
This looks like something I would find wrecked in Fallout 4.
It is day of judgement
Armageddon tank
Hitler's "Maus"would deserve that title more, I guess.
the armour piercing round coming for the ammo:🍷🎹🎹
I am from Russia and have to disappoint the audience a little - this “project” is a sketch, of which there were many. Stalin did not oversee such madness, moreover, when he was shown a prototype of a self-propelled artillery unit based on the KV, which had 2 45mm cannons or 2 76mm cannons, Stalin was sincerely surprised and said “why two guns? We need one gun, but a good gun!” This is how the Su-152 with a 152mm gun appeared. Stalin was a very competent person and would never have approved such techno-blunders even in the project.
1 april jokes is good but... millions beleives in flat earth or UFO, millions can to beleive in this )
No matter how I look at this vehicle, I can't unsee 3 tanks unnecessarily welded together.
4:04 Stalin’s Orchestra or Organ was actually the name for the Katyusha rocket launchers. Nice try though lol
This tank makes the Geneva Convention the Geneva Suggestion.
@FoundAnd Explained if your gunna be doing some wacky real or fake tanks then may I suggest to you Wargaming’s World of Tanks Waffenträger Ausf E-100
3:50 at least they were realistic with engine power
I love the "is good tank" line
Oh my god, it the kv6 from War Thunder.
The suspension💀
Stalin’s orchestra? More like Stalin’s circus 😂
Stalin’s organ was actually the nickname the Germans gave to the type of rockets fitted here. Because they looked like a pipe organ and made an eerie howling sound.
I remember seeing this incredible vehicle in the photos!
All you need to se is the KV prefix to know this tank would be batshit insane
Making this huge tank but modular like a train would make it easily feasible and fix the weight concerns
The only thing I can think of is how tf did that turn
All I could think was it must be a nightmare to maneuver.
"Poor transmission" is the only thing going through my head.
Recommendations for more channels similar to this
Ultrawar II history is so fascinating
Just stumbled upon it... Nice April's Fool post. Particularly like detail about tank tipping over after firing broadside. Two points: Drawings of several multi-turreted tanks were made but after failure of T-35 none went into production. And Katyusha was top secret weapon, fired and promptly pulled back to not be captured. Certainunly njever used very near frontline.
“make it thiner”
- engineer
When you look at the design of the turrets, there is not enough room for the crew.
It looks like a Metal Slug mini boss
Planes: it's a free target
As if Germany had any planes left by the late war
I can litteraly hear the grin you had while recording
If this The tank idea was split into three tank types then have them move as groups of three would have worked,
first tank for anti personal and anti air,
second tank with artillery capabilities
The third tank being heavy armor and heavy weaponry with two sub turrets each on the side of the tank to convey protections which is used for main attacking tank and trench defense/offense tank
each over lapping their specializations to point they are jack of all master of all type force.
For this standard tank teams are one of each tank and if they need more tanks of type they just group multiple 3 tank teams teams or have options to change team ratios.
Maybe even other tank types would be added to the team groups
Happy April’s fool
I understand your point for this video but Stalin’s Orchestra was a nickname for the BM-13 Katyusha Rocket artillery system
This is something I would build in Crossout
To be fair the Char 2C was a good real-life example of landcruiser : could only be moved on train and didn't fight.
You can't fool me boy
I would think that it would have 4 commanders. 1 commander for each turret. Then a head commander to provide orders to those other commanders
Kv-44:bang
Kv-44 engine:please boss gave mercy!
the tank also makes a great boss fight in Square Enix's Front Mission games.
How are you animating the model?
Using Unreal?
Finally tiger transmission issue have competitor lmao
Did you know that they called that the kv 6 bc it has 6 things that can shoot tank shells or bullets
At least I think
it would need far wider tread... and would be better being articulated with multiple treads... and systems that wouldn't allow it to shoot itself.
It came over the horizon and took up the entire horizon too
if this was in war thunder were all cooked
This concept could work if as an armored train.
my great uncles had to fight these on the don river during the stalingrad encirclement
What if somebody shots the rockets
Man i hope Leviathan doesn't give this tank too much trauma..
If possible, could you also made a video about P.1500 monster ,said to be gustav or dors railway gun but on track , thought it probably just fictional but i think it's interesting to discuss it🗿
Theyll love neutral steering in that tank
This tank would fit directly into command and conquer
Of course the tankies attempted to create an IRL Bolo Tank.
What are the cylinders hanging off the sides? Depth charges, or Torpedoes? And why is there no rear facing gun?
Fuel, most likely.
@@jimsvideos7201 That would be a really, REALLY bad idea.
@@bigbossimmotal It is - or at least until recently _was_ - a very common practice though.
I think it was in War Thunder
Actually, why isn’t this video sponsored by War Thunder?
Talk about a series of unfortunate events
The biggest and only flaw, so massive it would have stopped the project, was that a tank cannot traverse (rotate around its center) if is too long as the tracks would have to skid through so much ground and the tank that would have dig themselves in the earth and stuck the tank for ever.
So you can't build long tanks because you can't turn them.
The kv2 was actually more a support tank and was not produced in huge numbers. The isu's were kind of self propelled guns a bit like the german stug3.
Can you do the Shuman Superdreadnought?
F&E I have two videos ideas, a What if of a Passenger version of the SR-71 Blackbird and the Supersonic Bomber version of the Concorde.