When it was explained to me that atomic structure is quantized probability of information existence, (turning complex qualities into mathematically related quantities, or tuning resonances), and the quanta were representative of the focus of a "field", (the relative quantitative difference of a quality), ..a product of a natural calculation by the universe as a whole, and recognizable in the formation of musical instruments and sounds, or Radio/TV etc modulation techniques), then I have always seen the featured properties of the universe as an integration of probability frequencies that have to have a single multi oscillator "point of origin", (that must also act as if it were a reflector because "it's always there", in continuous existence). Ie entanglement is both origin and reflection according to probability calculation run forward or back. And then the uncertainty principle of trying to reverse a complex calculation involving all this connected information in continuity means that the wave of integration naturally changes shape in all the ways recognized, in infinity, because it is one interactive integration in totality. That would be a Superposition, in which relatively incompatible integration states produce uncertain "alignments" of values, and so create structure by inclusion/exclusion differences. (in layman's terms) So I don't know enough about how the suggested problem is derived to guess what degree of entangled information can be exchanged, (which would be at a frequency beyond normal techniques), because the uncertainty part means that there is a concentric arrangement of probability on probability of varying degrees in communication, according to the "note" complexity/chord, like Quantum Chemistry of the universe. (still not much help? But thanks for the interesting thought experiments)
@David Wilkie may you explain about multi universe theory? Only one question is bothering me, are there the same souls in my many physical bodies? Only you can explain I think.
since the entanglement(information transferr between particles) breaks the speed of light limit can we assume that this(the transferr) is happening in an extra dimension and it seems in our 3d or 4d(plus time) happened instatly even the particles are on the other side of the universe. string theory have a lot to say about that.
complexity K-now K-new time space continuum audi toggle botton computer like. symmetry funny s-now deadly aids dna communication in water. hexagonal cubic comet
There is not a logic problem here? According to Polchinski the Susskind´s statements implies that there is firewalls. If Susskink says now that there is not firewalls, it implies that the Susskind´s statements are wrong.
You're correct, there's a huge problem on exactly that topic and nobody knows the correct answer. Watch this to understand better ruclips.net/video/_8bhtEgB8Mo/видео.html
aoflex thank you, great link and explanations. Leonard susskind's lecture is mend for fairly advanced physicians who do Research in that Domain, and not for everyday bob. THat's why ist harder to understand. It is not mend to be explained for the big public.
aoflex haha, dont worry i have a masters in physics it is just that english is my 5 th language and i did not want to bother googeling the spelling. And ye physicians are something different :P
MrTornadillo My impression is that Susskind says firewalls could be made, but it is so difficult (even for Alice with her magic computer) that the ordinary environment around a black hole would almost never make a firewall.
You are not foolish, you sir are awesome. Totally makes sense. Thank you!
Thanks so much for posting this. Awesome new physics!
When it was explained to me that atomic structure is quantized probability of information existence, (turning complex qualities into mathematically related quantities, or tuning resonances), and the quanta were representative of the focus of a "field", (the relative quantitative difference of a quality), ..a product of a natural calculation by the universe as a whole, and recognizable in the formation of musical instruments and sounds, or Radio/TV etc modulation techniques), then I have always seen the featured properties of the universe as an integration of probability frequencies that have to have a single multi oscillator "point of origin", (that must also act as if it were a reflector because "it's always there", in continuous existence). Ie entanglement is both origin and reflection according to probability calculation run forward or back. And then the uncertainty principle of trying to reverse a complex calculation involving all this connected information in continuity means that the wave of integration naturally changes shape in all the ways recognized, in infinity, because it is one interactive integration in totality. That would be a Superposition, in which relatively incompatible integration states produce uncertain "alignments" of values, and so create structure by inclusion/exclusion differences. (in layman's terms)
So I don't know enough about how the suggested problem is derived to guess what degree of entangled information can be exchanged, (which would be at a frequency beyond normal techniques), because the uncertainty part means that there is a concentric arrangement of probability on probability of varying degrees in communication, according to the "note" complexity/chord, like Quantum Chemistry of the universe. (still not much help? But thanks for the interesting thought experiments)
@David Wilkie may you explain about multi universe theory? Only one question is bothering me, are there the same souls in my many physical bodies? Only you can explain I think.
Ready to leave earth?
RIP Joseph Polchinski
since the entanglement(information transferr between particles) breaks the speed of light limit can we assume that this(the transferr) is happening in an extra dimension and it seems in our 3d or 4d(plus time) happened instatly even the particles are on the other side of the universe. string theory have a lot to say about that.
2:30 Yiddish/German "Spitz Schwitz" ?
complexity K-now K-new time space continuum audi toggle botton computer like. symmetry funny s-now deadly aids dna communication in water. hexagonal cubic comet
1:00 .... and Lenny Susskind has problems with combinatorics
(e.g. his "Statistical Mechanics Lect. 3") :-)
There is not a logic problem here? According to Polchinski the Susskind´s statements implies that there is firewalls. If Susskink says now that there is not firewalls, it implies that the Susskind´s statements are wrong.
You're correct, there's a huge problem on exactly that topic and nobody knows the correct answer. Watch this to understand better ruclips.net/video/_8bhtEgB8Mo/видео.html
aoflex thank you, great link and explanations. Leonard susskind's lecture is mend for fairly advanced physicians who do Research in that Domain, and not for everyday bob. THat's why ist harder to understand. It is not mend to be explained for the big public.
phil durre You're welcome. Also, we're called physicists, not physicians. BIG difference!
aoflex haha, dont worry i have a masters in physics it is just that english is my 5 th language and i did not want to bother googeling the spelling. And ye physicians are something different :P
MrTornadillo My impression is that Susskind says firewalls could be made, but it is so difficult (even for Alice with her magic computer) that the ordinary environment around a black hole would almost never make a firewall.
Skip to the physics @ 4:20
NCIE WROK!
15:43 "...a simple mathematical trick." UwU
Hermitian operators
If ccc has a backbone. How many oracles could you achieve with three rings.
Nothing is a simple mathematical trick. You just try to learn something
diogenes of sinope was a hero and an old fool too lenny don't sweat it