It’s more of a social explanation of our situation, but I quite agree with him. The purpose of Guruswamy centre is to stimulate thought and debate, both well achieved 👍
Truth is harsh! Professor Roy speech shows us the mirror and depressing to listen. After 20 years, every word he spoke will become a reality unless a miracle happens.
Mr Roy is correct in talking abt fraternity But it is the duty of the protectors of the constitution to set an example by promoting the values of fraternity Aren’t our leaders who are rich n privileged supposed to set an example so that the general population takes inspiration from them Isn’t that the way the freedom struggle was galvanised into a movement
Economist juxtapose one region without deep thought. Its easy to bemoan inability to building Textile mills in UP and use the cheap labour, but it doesn't work that way. For e.g. Bangladesh is a textile hub for a reason. Textile Industry requires plenty of water apart from cheap labour. Bangladesh's river system is made up of many rivers that flow into the Ganges Delta, the world's largest river delta. Furthermore, women in Bangladesh are more empowered than in North India and woman constitute the majority of work force in Textile. One has to consider all these factors.
Late 80's were boring? Given the state of the world today, many people would want to go back to the 80's if they could. But Dr. Roy is an economist, so he probably prefers rampant financialization, boom and bust economy, trillion dollar scams and all the rest of the fun we get to have today.
Questions to Vallabhai Patel and Savarkar ================= It's only in war "DIVIDE AND CONQUER IS IMPORTANT". In peace following war it is UNITE TO SURRENDER ". Did they not realise that it would be enormously expensive for anyone to be PM of HUGE empire sized nation than becoming president of TINY Singapore? Did they not observe that Britain which ruled the world was TINY? Did they not reason that democracy in huge empire means mountains of money required for political parties to win elections? Loot is a necessary requirement. Did not the English nation divided into five countries Australia , Canada, Newzealand, United States, United Kingdom join hands to finish off Hitler? Were the entire English nation in one single country? Also that British Empire was not a genuine empire like Russian empire or Japanese empire? The ratio of population of India and Singapore is 250. It is 250 times more difficult for any good idea to win in India than in Singapore. Also bad ideas spread faster than good ones as India is a democracy in huge empire. It's 250 times probable that bad and evil ideas spreads in India than in Singapore. If it takes 50 years for a great leader to become president of Singapore, it will take 250x 50 years 12500 , or 12.5 millennia for a great leader to become prime minister. Brown empire can't implement the 1931 Karachi Congress resolution for free gun laws. On the other hand it goes for welfare state Perhaps they were not aware of what Carl Jung said that larger the group(in this case country or brown empire) more is the immorality. But that shows they were not keeping abreast with latest thinking on morality. Centralization was what British did for administrative convenience. Unthinking Indians elevated to a moral principle.. ONE is a mania now. Latest evil idea is from Rahul Gandhi - It is income redistribution.
He has nothing to say. Waste of time. Totally disjointed, changes his mind in the middle of sentences. Very very confused. Doesn't even know who the owner of Apollo is
Problem with RR is that he is (a) bitter critic of the govt pretending to be nuetral (b) he amplifies the problems without explaining the political realities and political- social compulsions of the state. He hypocritically side stepped the farm laws and the mess of agri-subsidies which is an unresolvavle political blackmail. He will not address the labour laws that stifle our production scale. An economist has to talk about politico administrative structures operating on the ground. Bihar will not become an economic hub because it is Lalu's jungle as was Uttar Pradesh. If Adityanath is trying to create basic law and order it is lost on RR. He has nothing to say about the rural infra and women's schemes which has startlingly changed the country side. He has little to talk about improvements in health indicators and nutrition quotient. If the govt is trying to go around caste and sect differentiations , he doesn't mention them. At the very end he tentatively touches on our organic deficiencies. He should actually have started with them and then proceeded to link them to the economic stack. He has shied away from that.
Ideas in formation of country was leftist which created present hell, All the main political trends from 1947 was leftist - barring members of yet to be born Swatantra Party. Founder of Janata Party Jayaprakash Narayan believed that there should be no right to property. Socialist Jayaprakash Narayan were absolutely against a clause that prohibited expropriation without compensation. Jayaprakash Narayan-inspired Janata Government that deleted the right to property as a fundamental right in 1978. Is it any wonder the leftist views of JP resulted in jungle/ goonda Raj of Bihar? A Chief minister once said this on National TV when asked why IT BT had not developed in Bihar: "Yeh IT BT kya hota hai? Hame Cheena aata hai". Translated "What's this IT BT? We don't require them as we know how to snatch". Naturally this led to largest internal migration in history. Robbery was institutionalized by Ninth Schedule allowing political thugs capturing absolute power. The Ninth Schedule of the Indian Constitution is a list of laws that cannot be challenged in court. It was added to the Constitution in 1951 by the First Amendment Act. By Nehru. Supreme court ruled courts can intervene if fundamental rights are attacked. Another communist thug Janata Party came along and removed property rights from fundamental rights. Leftism makes politician supreme. End the career choice of being a politician for EVERYONE by transferring power to competing consortium of insurance companies. This will end bribes, monetary and otherwise to obtain votes as everyone would need buy the shares of Insurance companies in order to vote. Also insurance companies can get rich only if people become rich. It's an improved version of East India Company.
@@dr.rangarajc9691you must be happy now that of the GDP of nearly 3 trillion dollar economy that the country supposedly is nearly 1 trillion is with 200 individuals and rest all need to struggle entire lives for the remaining pie and the large proportion of the population should lives like ants to work in sweat shops and die in crowds at religious gathering while Ac room thinkers like you will go about giving your gyan on capitalism and socialism as if we don’t understand the nonsense that you’ll try to fool people with.
What law and order is displayed by Bisht, in UP? The deaths of innocents in hospital fires, pandemics, epidemics, and tirth yatra stampedes? Oh please. This nonsense peddled by your likes has become very saturated and stale at this point of time. It's you who cannot look beyond your disgusting manifestation of petty politics and look for accountability of the ones who put on a pedestal
Also, the rural infra scheme was introduced, by the UP, and so were the women's upliftment schemes which have been repackaged. Solution? Nothing much has changed. Women participation has marginally improved. This can only indicate failed policy steps, despite good intentions, which has been RR's point from the very beginning. Talking about better health and nutritional quotient, compared to what? Measured against what? India has the highest amount of child malnutrition and zero food babies in the world, and amongst the worst per capita. Add to that this and all previous regimes obsession with vegetarian bs, you have a populace which suffers terribly from protein deficiencies. All your sly praises to your choice of obsequiousness is that much obvious
Ideas in formation of country was leftist which created present hell, All the main political trends from 1947 was leftist - barring members of yet to be born Swatantra Party. Founder of Janata Party Jayaprakash Narayan believed that there should be no right to property. Socialist Jayaprakash Narayan were absolutely against a clause that prohibited expropriation without compensation. Jayaprakash Narayan-inspired Janata Government that deleted the right to property as a fundamental right in 1978. Is it any wonder the leftist views of JP resulted in jungle/ goonda Raj of Bihar? A Chief minister once said this on National TV when asked why IT BT had not developed in Bihar: "Yeh IT BT kya hota hai? Hame Cheena aata hai". Translated "What's this IT BT? We don't require them as we know how to snatch". Naturally this led to largest internal migration in history. Robbery was institutionalized by Ninth Schedule allowing political thugs capturing absolute power. The Ninth Schedule of the Indian Constitution is a list of laws that cannot be challenged in court. It was added to the Constitution in 1951 by the First Amendment Act. By Nehru. Supreme court ruled courts can intervene if fundamental rights are attacked. Another communist thug Janata Party came along and removed property rights from fundamental rights. Leftism makes politician supreme. End the career choice of being a politician for EVERYONE by transferring power to competing consortium of insurance companies. This will end bribes, monetary and otherwise to obtain votes as everyone would need buy the shares of Insurance companies in order to vote. Also insurance companies can get rich only if people become rich. It's an improved version of East India Company.
It’s more of a social explanation of our situation, but I quite agree with him. The purpose of Guruswamy centre is to stimulate thought and debate, both well achieved 👍
Thank you Dr Rathin ji
Always speak with such clarity and compassion Sir
Dr Rathin is a delight, as always!
Truth is harsh! Professor Roy speech shows us the mirror and depressing to listen. After 20 years, every word he spoke will become a reality unless a miracle happens.
🙏🙏
48:02 well put
Hi Rathin: You provided a great analysis. I live in a legacy country; so I can see it.
Outstanding
Congratulations king 👑 you complete such gold video in era of shorts and reels
37:37 brilliant point again
Rathin babu speaks so well!
Mr Roy is correct in talking abt fraternity But it is the duty of the protectors of the constitution to set an example by promoting the values of fraternity Aren’t our leaders who are rich n privileged supposed to set an example so that the general population takes inspiration from them Isn’t that the way the freedom struggle was galvanised into a movement
Thank you sir for showing us the mirror.
Reiterating problems over and over again will not make them go away. If you're smart, have a recommended plan of action. Else don't waste time.
Economist juxtapose one region without deep thought. Its easy to bemoan inability to building Textile mills in UP and use the cheap labour, but it doesn't work that way. For e.g. Bangladesh is a textile hub for a reason. Textile Industry requires plenty of water apart from cheap labour. Bangladesh's river system is made up of many rivers that flow into the Ganges Delta, the world's largest river delta. Furthermore, women in Bangladesh are more empowered than in North India and woman constitute the majority of work force in Textile. One has to consider all these factors.
he has similar views as Ajay shah. i want them on same stage
Late 80's were boring? Given the state of the world today, many people would want to go back to the 80's if they could. But Dr. Roy is an economist, so he probably prefers rampant financialization, boom and bust economy, trillion dollar scams and all the rest of the fun we get to have today.
He is almost a free market absolutist.
I like listening to him, but I don’t find myself agreeing with him.
True. He speaks passionately but doesn't sound practical at the sane time.
@@chandrasekhar-Bhe is practical. His suggestions are mirrored with actual policy. I suggest you educate yourself in the policy suggestions itself
Questions to Vallabhai Patel and Savarkar
=================
It's only in war "DIVIDE AND CONQUER IS IMPORTANT". In peace following war it is UNITE TO SURRENDER ".
Did they not realise that it would be enormously expensive for anyone to be PM of HUGE empire sized nation than becoming president of TINY Singapore?
Did they not observe that Britain which ruled the world was TINY?
Did they not reason that democracy in huge empire means mountains of money required for political parties to win elections? Loot is a necessary requirement.
Did not the English nation divided into five countries Australia , Canada, Newzealand, United States, United Kingdom join hands to finish off Hitler? Were the entire English nation in one single country? Also that British Empire was not a genuine empire like Russian empire or Japanese empire?
The ratio of population of India and Singapore is 250. It is 250 times more difficult for any good idea to win in India than in Singapore. Also bad ideas spread faster than good ones as India is a democracy in huge empire. It's 250 times probable that bad and evil ideas spreads in India than in Singapore. If it takes 50 years for a great leader to become president of Singapore, it will take 250x 50 years 12500 , or 12.5 millennia for a great leader to become prime minister. Brown empire can't implement the 1931 Karachi Congress resolution for free gun laws. On the other hand it goes for welfare state
Perhaps they were not aware of what Carl Jung said that larger the group(in this case country or brown empire) more is the immorality. But that shows they were not keeping abreast with latest thinking on morality. Centralization was what British did for administrative convenience. Unthinking Indians elevated to a moral principle.. ONE is a mania now. Latest evil idea is from Rahul Gandhi -
It is income redistribution.
He has nothing to say. Waste of time. Totally disjointed, changes his mind in the middle of sentences. Very very confused. Doesn't even know who the owner of Apollo is
And yet his policy suggestions are literally based on research. A hilarious comment
Problem with RR is that he is (a) bitter critic of the govt pretending to be nuetral (b) he amplifies the problems without explaining the political realities and political- social compulsions of the state. He hypocritically side stepped the farm laws and the mess of agri-subsidies which is an unresolvavle political blackmail. He will not address the labour laws that stifle our production scale. An economist has to talk about politico administrative structures operating on the ground. Bihar will not become an economic hub because it is Lalu's jungle as was Uttar Pradesh. If Adityanath is trying to create basic law and order it is lost on RR. He has nothing to say about the rural infra and women's schemes which has startlingly changed the country side. He has little to talk about improvements in health indicators and nutrition quotient. If the govt is trying to go around caste and sect differentiations , he doesn't mention them. At the very end he tentatively touches on our organic deficiencies. He should actually have started with them and then proceeded to link them to the economic stack. He has shied away from that.
Needs therapy for depression.
Ideas in formation of country was leftist which created present hell, All the main political trends from 1947 was leftist - barring members of yet to be born Swatantra Party.
Founder of Janata Party Jayaprakash Narayan believed that there should be no right to property. Socialist Jayaprakash Narayan were absolutely against a clause that prohibited expropriation without compensation. Jayaprakash Narayan-inspired Janata
Government that deleted the right to property as a fundamental right in 1978. Is it any wonder the leftist views of JP resulted in jungle/ goonda Raj of Bihar? A Chief minister once said this on National TV when asked why IT BT had not developed in Bihar: "Yeh IT BT kya hota hai? Hame Cheena aata hai". Translated "What's this IT BT? We don't require them as we know how to snatch". Naturally this led to largest internal migration in history.
Robbery was institutionalized by Ninth Schedule allowing political thugs capturing absolute power. The Ninth Schedule of the Indian Constitution is a list of laws that cannot be challenged in court. It was added to the Constitution in 1951 by the First Amendment Act. By Nehru. Supreme court ruled courts can intervene if fundamental rights are attacked. Another communist thug Janata Party came along and removed property rights from fundamental rights.
Leftism makes politician supreme. End the career choice of being a politician for EVERYONE by transferring power to competing consortium of insurance companies. This will end bribes, monetary and otherwise to obtain votes as everyone would need buy the shares of Insurance companies in order to vote. Also insurance companies can get rich only if people become rich. It's an improved version of East India Company.
@@dr.rangarajc9691you must be happy now that of the GDP of nearly 3 trillion dollar economy that the country supposedly is nearly 1 trillion is with 200 individuals and rest all need to struggle entire lives for the remaining pie and the large proportion of the population should lives like ants to work in sweat shops and die in crowds at religious gathering while Ac room thinkers like you will go about giving your gyan on capitalism and socialism as if we don’t understand the nonsense that you’ll try to fool people with.
What law and order is displayed by Bisht, in UP? The deaths of innocents in hospital fires, pandemics, epidemics, and tirth yatra stampedes? Oh please. This nonsense peddled by your likes has become very saturated and stale at this point of time. It's you who cannot look beyond your disgusting manifestation of petty politics and look for accountability of the ones who put on a pedestal
Also, the rural infra scheme was introduced, by the UP, and so were the women's upliftment schemes which have been repackaged. Solution? Nothing much has changed. Women participation has marginally improved. This can only indicate failed policy steps, despite good intentions, which has been RR's point from the very beginning.
Talking about better health and nutritional quotient, compared to what? Measured against what? India has the highest amount of child malnutrition and zero food babies in the world, and amongst the worst per capita. Add to that this and all previous regimes obsession with vegetarian bs, you have a populace which suffers terribly from protein deficiencies.
All your sly praises to your choice of obsequiousness is that much obvious
This guy is on drugs
I am afraid, he is talking 'sophisticated nonsense'.
I am afraid, but I fear you haven't cared enough to listen to him.
Such a bitter man who allows his political leanings to cloud his opinions. Disappointing talk.
And what are his political leanings again? Spoken like an obsequious stooge who cannot think beyond his own political dualism.
Just checked your subscriptions. Mate you literally follow a discharged clown like Gaurav Arya. Less said about bitterness, the better
Ideas in formation of country was leftist which created present hell, All the main political trends from 1947 was leftist - barring members of yet to be born Swatantra Party.
Founder of Janata Party Jayaprakash Narayan believed that there should be no right to property. Socialist Jayaprakash Narayan were absolutely against a clause that prohibited expropriation without compensation. Jayaprakash Narayan-inspired Janata
Government that deleted the right to property as a fundamental right in 1978. Is it any wonder the leftist views of JP resulted in jungle/ goonda Raj of Bihar? A Chief minister once said this on National TV when asked why IT BT had not developed in Bihar: "Yeh IT BT kya hota hai? Hame Cheena aata hai". Translated "What's this IT BT? We don't require them as we know how to snatch". Naturally this led to largest internal migration in history.
Robbery was institutionalized by Ninth Schedule allowing political thugs capturing absolute power. The Ninth Schedule of the Indian Constitution is a list of laws that cannot be challenged in court. It was added to the Constitution in 1951 by the First Amendment Act. By Nehru. Supreme court ruled courts can intervene if fundamental rights are attacked. Another communist thug Janata Party came along and removed property rights from fundamental rights.
Leftism makes politician supreme. End the career choice of being a politician for EVERYONE by transferring power to competing consortium of insurance companies. This will end bribes, monetary and otherwise to obtain votes as everyone would need buy the shares of Insurance companies in order to vote. Also insurance companies can get rich only if people become rich. It's an improved version of East India Company.
Spoken like a friedmaniac fool.