I am researching for a presentation I have to hold on how the Glorious Revolution and Locke are connected and this was really helpful. Thank you for uploading your lecture, I loved the enthusiasm.
And Mary's father was James II and VII. The invitation for William to rule included the caveat that she co-rule, hence the hard-core royalists could justify that William's rule didn't interfere with the tradition of succession.
I love when he calls the students out for not reading the text, then compares their work ethic to Locke. That was great.
I am researching for a presentation I have to hold on how the Glorious Revolution and Locke are connected and this was really helpful. Thank you for uploading your lecture, I loved the enthusiasm.
And Mary's father was James II and VII. The invitation for William to rule included the caveat that she co-rule, hence the hard-core royalists could justify that William's rule didn't interfere with the tradition of succession.
how did you do it can you share with me , thank you
this is sick i have so many questions where can i learn more?
I know you wanna fix that typo in the video title...don't you?? (wait am I that guy?)
Thanks! Fexed it.
Adam Rosenfeld Hey, wait a minute...lbnol (laughed, but not out loud)
I think you mean Charles I and Charles II
the theory is right on... but Mary Wolls. was born in 1759 so wouldn't have been part of Charles' exiled court. Who do you mean? Mary Astell?