@paulonius42 scientific education should be free for everyone! many other channels do that e.g. World Science Festival hosted by Professor Brian Green.
@checkmilu Science information should be free for all, but nobody should be obligated to spend their time educating you for free. In a debate such as this, the individuals are contributing their thoughts and time, and all the data they are discussing can be found freely. It's reasonable to pay people for contributing their own thoughts and time.
@paulonius42 scientists get paid for their research, raising public awareness of science should be their free contribution, if not people will turn elsewhere. I'd choose World science Festival and Closer to Truth channel any day over this greedy channel.
I really hope that we can solve the mystery between classical mechanics that make sense in everyday life and quantum mechanics that makes sense in a scientific level in my lifetime. Living to see quantum mechanics truly understood and having a simple explanation would be incredible. I cant wait, i hope we're smart enough to figure it out and it's not just simply above our cognition!
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
Probably, but I think the job of philosophers should be to interpret reality in regards to the physics, rather than to refuse to interpret reality and insist the physics must be incomplete because it does not match with their preconceptions. The speculations about some alternative physics should be left to the physicists.
True incomplete and fragmented, we need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
Quantum theory deals with various subatomic energy fields; in contrast, general and special relativity deal with macro events where by definition the energy fields have not just coalesced into matter - but have done so on massive scales, such as planets, solar systems and galaxies. Thus, gravity and the effect of mass (in bending the space-time fabric) has a huge effect while at the quantum level these forces have no effect as either the energy fields have no or too little mass to effect the space-time continuum. Thus, quantum and general/special relativity don’t really conflict but both represent reality - just at opposite ends of the same pole.
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
But paradores arise as they are incompatible, like the information paradox in which QM says information should be conserved however if information (matter) falls into a black hole, according to relativity, that information is lost, but QM says it should be preserved. Also QM says in a singularity quantum effects should govern, but QM can't acurrately describe gravity, so we can't acurrately describe what happends inside a black hole without a unified theory
@@dylan_silva6587 Relativity does not assert that information is lost, just because it’s within a black hole. The “information” (energy/mass) still exists undoubtably in some form but it’s largely inaccessible to an observer outside the black hole. However, it is accessible within the black hole. It all depends on one’s frame of reference, which is too say it’s all relative to where the observer is, ergo “relativity.” The greater “paradox” is that in QM gravity and mass play no role, but the scales are so small that the spacetime field is not appreciably warped or otherwise disturbed. In fact, when drilled down to the smallest elements, what was initially perceived of as a “particle” turns as to be really a quanta of energy and the so called “particles” are really behaving as a field of energy. Again, no real paradox, just differences due to scale and perspective. That said, there should be a way to describe mathematically the scale at which mass starts to play a role yet surprisingly so far no one has done so even tho it would be hailed as the “unifying” math between QM and relativity.
@@Ebobster No because black holes eventually evaporate due to Hawking radiation, but when they do, the information of the quantum systems is lost, that violates unitarity, which is a fundemental aspect in quantum mechanics
@@EbobsterNo, relativity says black holes evaporate due to Hawking radiation, but unitarity is violated as the information of the quantum systems is lost, unitarity is a fundamental aspect of QM, but in general relativity it seems to be violated as the information is lost
Time is simply a constructed unit of measure. Relativity refers to the point at which a measure is observed. Since the point of observation can be variable; so can relative measure be variable.
God, I wish I didn't have to work 40 hours a week. I'd love to spend my days researching this stuff, watching open source courses on the fundamentals of physics, while concurrently practicing and evolving my applied mathematics skills. Man, what a let down, seems I'll have to wait a couple decades, by which then my fluid intelligence will have been largely spent contributing to the capitalistic and neoliberal edifice. Of course, I could pursue academia, but that's a game I don't have the character to partake in and enjoy.
Then do it. You’re energy and matter like everything else. Do what you would love to do. Make it up if you have to. Find your way. Create something that has never been before. Maybe it’ll be a new way for more than just you. Let your curiosity about the nature of reality be your guide through your own experience of it all.
I mean, if you had the intelligence to be able to truly make scientific breakthroughs in physics/math, then you probably could find a way to make enough money in a few years and then never have to worry about money again.
Actually it's way simpler than most think. Time is often defined as the 4th dimension, isn't it? And dimension can actually be interpreted/expressed in another way as "permission". How so? As we already know, the first 3 dimensions pertain to the 3D space of our physical universe. Matters/Particles found within this space have the ability to move in 3 different axes. That can also be defined as "3 distinct permissions" for the particles in space to move freely - in the X, Y and Z axes respectively. Therefore, Time is simply another dimension (permission) that enables Matter to move freely in Space. It's that simple really, yet many are still perplexed by the concept of time due to partial or incomplete understanding of the origin of this universe. Once we understand that dimensions are actually interchangeable term with permissions, "everything" in creation simply falls into place. Perfect clarity arises and seemingly abstract, mysterious, confounding concepts starts to make perfect sense. You see, for in the beginning, there is One who created and gave all these things the "permissions" to behave the way as they should, governed by the laws of physics. These laws didn't happen by coincidence, but were purposefully created by the Lawgiver. Now, with ongoing research and tremendous advancement in technology, scientists are getting even closer to discovering what "reality" is all about. The space we once knew is no longer the only one in existence. Hyperspace is the new reality. Well guess what, this had already been revealed ages ago. The Author of the best selling and most distributed book in human history (according to Guinness World Records), stated that this universe we live in which can be observed/seen, came from that which can't be seen (Hebrews 11:3). With the advent of QM, only now we're discovering this had been a fact..a reality, all along. Hmm, isn't it such an exciting period of time we're living in? Concerning the debate, ironically both Kaku and Elitzur are correct...with Elitzur being the more adamant one in his own exposition, haha. Time works differently at quantum levels because we're stepping into the realm of hyperspace...that is, spaces beyond our physical, observable space. We're doing a great job of "reverse engineering" our way back to the creation of our universe and progressively discovering that what's on the other side is governed by "additional, yet to be discovered" laws of physics. That's a really exciting prospect, to be honest...what a time to be alive!! The block universe is indeed a reality (i.e. major world/cosmological events were already "written in the stars", as it were, waiting to occur at appointed their time). On a smaller personal scale, freewill DOES exist and it is therefore a reality too. Some sadly deny this fact/reality...prefers to classify this as mere illusion, along with time. Look, even a humble tiny little photon can exhibit particle duality, what more something of "greater magnitude in importance" like time, isn't it so? Hence, both scientists are absolutely correct, though it appears they can't seem to agree, with Elitzur being the more "adamant, strong-headed" one. Nice seeing this sort of debate though, even though the full recording isn't published for free. Thanks to the admin anyways..cheerio!
If time does not flow, How can we measure the speed of light ? If the concept of time did not exist, it would be impossible to measure the speed of light. This is because the speed of light is calculated as the ratio of distance to time. Without time, there would be no way to measure distance either. This is because distance is defined as the displacement between two points, and displacement is defined in terms of the passage of time.
@@mathamour Precisely. Time does exist, just that it doesn't exist or is defined in the form most presume it to be. The flow of time is simply the enablement for particles/matters to move freely in space, thus enabling motion which we then observe and termed as "the passage of time". In the same vein, all higher dimensions (be it 8 or 11..i personally believe either one should be the most reasonable/logical numbers of real dimensions in existence) can be treated as "permissions or enablers" ...allowing exotic, unknown, yet-to-be-discovered particles to move and behave as they ought to within hyperspace. Similar to our space-time continuum, higher dimensional space-time contains unknown particles which are "being enabled" to move freely and interact with one another, and yes even with our lower dimensional matters. Perhaps this accounts for dark matter actually is, sth which can't be seen yet it tangibly interacts with our physical matters in a very real, profound way. One more thing worth mentioning, in that best selling/most distributed Book, it is mentioned there are at least "3 spaces or heavens" - the 1st, 2nd and 3rd heaven. The 1st heaven being our cosmos and 3rd heaven is the dwelling place of the Most High. Though the 2nd isn't being referenced directly, but is understood if there's a 1st and 3rd mentioned clearly, surely the 2nd exist as well. Hence a simple deduction can already be made that hyperspace is indeed a reality, without having to delve into deep mathematics or physics. The first verse from that Book sums it all, "In the beginning, the Creator created the heavens and earth." (Genesis 1:1) Heavens in its original text means "Shamayim", which can translated to mean sky, heaven or simply space...an empty place where all particles/matters of its respective realm forms everything which resides within that space. Thus from this single verse itself, it directly implies there is more than one space in existence. Hope what's shared helps those who genuinely seek to understand the foundation of our universe and reality of hyperspace a little better... 🙂
@@hometheatre1706 "Excuse me, but I wasn't referring to time in a religious sense. In fact, I find the Bible to be full of contradictions, illogical arguments, and fantastical stories."
@@mathamour I know you're not referring to time in that sense. But at some point, philosophy (call it religion, fantasy, etc.) and science will inevitably collide as more discoveries are being made. Even top physicists and theoretical ones are getting more at odds with one another, even though incredible progress have been made in the recent few decades via scientific methods. Anyway I'm just here to share with others what I've observed and learnt thus far from my own journey of discovering reality. Plus I'm not limiting myself to just purely one source of interpretation. The more I learn, it seems clear to me everyone with real intention to uncover the truth behind reality provides another missing puzzle to the big, grandiose complete picture. I'm personally convinced that one day, we will without a doubt fully understand the mysteries of hyperspace... And bet my bottom dollar it'll be stranger and wilder than fiction. By the way, I'm sorry if I've offended you in anyway 🙏🏻...that's not my intention. Cheers my friend, wishing you a blessed and happy life always! 🙂🥂
Ancient Greek philosophers and European theologians, not knowing the basic elements of matter and having no knowledge of the movements of celestial bodies outside the Earth, criticized scientists by making very fictional and comic-like remarks. When we measure the length of an object, we simply measure the length with a ruler, and we do not say that it is long in a philosophical sense, that long is different from short, or that long is mysterious and short is not mysterious. We simply want to know its length. Time is mysterious because it is invisible to our eyes and cannot be touched. However, we are asking for a scientific explanation of the nature of time. We do not want to hear mystical fiction about time. The idea that we can say anything about time because it is invisible is no different from the ancient Greek philosophers and medieval European theologians saying anything they want. I am not a mystic, and philosophy is just a matter of opinion, so it is of no help in measuring the length and width of an object. Although I do not blindly accept all tenets of physics, my discovery of numerous contradictions within the Bible, which no theologian has satisfactorily explained, prevented me from maintaining my Christian faith indefinitely.
I find it interesting that when discussing the ontological nature of the universe, they (the physicists), by their own calculations, have no idea what 95% of the universe is made of (as in "dark energy" and "dark matter") and the possible role those truly "hidden variables" may play in the deeper workings of reality.
They are dancing around a Theory of Time. I wish one of the theoretical physicists would sit down with their thinking caps on, write down the properties of time, and write a mathematical theory defining those properties. Just like Newton did for all physical phenomenon he could measure. for instance... 1. In order for C to be measured as a constant. Everyone has to experience time ticking at the same rate in all frames of reference. But at different rates when measured between different frames of reference. Once a mathematical theory of time is established, I'll bet most of the confusion will be lifted.
How can one develop a mathematical theory about the speed of something when the concept of speed entails material existents, time and movement when movement of an object is only relative to another object and there are an uncountable number of other objects and time is a concept only?
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
@@twa9995 Einstein uses the concept of time within his theory of relativity but his using the temporal concept does not magically transform that concept into a "thing" in the universe.
8:36 go use a 3 way mirror with a 4th mirror-you will be in super position of all your quantum many worlds. Choose your experience, chart a course and in time you get there? 😊
There is a simple and elegant way to merge quantum mechanics and relativity and it is through integrating consciousness into the picture. Avshalom knows it and resents it with his whole being, for no real reason but fear. The situation is no different than what galillo and Copernicus had to endure in their time, only now main stream science, as it is, is the catholic church, and gallileo is David bohm and others who challange the stiff idea that consciousness has nothing to do with physical reality
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
There’s more science in a flat earth convention than anything Kaku says. Since most Kaku fans are probably flat earthers I need to point out that there’s no science in the Flat Earth community.
Time is an illusion albeit a persistent one. The past exists only in the memory. A previous now. And the future is a now that hasn't happened yet. You can't exist in the past, you only have a memory of it. And you can't exist in the future but only in an idea or image of what it could be. You were present in your past, you're present now and you'll be present in your future. Therefore all we have is the present.
(1)There are no hidden variables. There are fundamental variables. I explain this with the electron on my channel here. (2) The notion that “we have experiments that proof” is not true. Often in quantum mechanics, experiments only “show” us what, it doesn’t explain “how” it happened. Lastly, “proof as I define it, is evidence, either in the nature of its presentation or a link to the actual occurrence that cannot be subjected to any reasonable opposing argument.”
Wow, your comment alone just got your channel one more subscriber! I'm seriously excited to check out your content! I'm new to this and so fascinated to learn more, so I appreciate the straight to the point, well-stated info you shared. 🙏🏽👩🔬
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
If this is true, and we could apply it to the larger scale of our own lives, that would mean that if we change our selves in the present, we are there for changing ourselves in the past, and the future as well? Very interesting concept to think of.
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
Physics is stuck for a very long time. Scientists became influencer and media stars because Fantasy ideas are more sellable. What we need is fresh eye, better questions, young people who are not stuck in the past. Hydrogen Collider was a hell waste of money but idea was sellable. There are very few scientists like Roger Penrose who are bold enough to say they were wrong in the past. Very few are bold enough to admit.
One problem is that we use the classical space with quantum experiments. Three-dimensional Space is a classical construct. Then, there is Time. But, that, IMO, doesn't exist. I think a better approach is to postulate that existence is a Simulation. Start with that assumption as true and then reconcile the experiments within that box.
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
Time flows because spacetime flows. If every particle in the universe ceased to exist, time would still flow. The ocean exists whether there are bubbles and waves on it or not.
@@AndrewMilesMurphy I would say that inappropriate maths is the bane of cosmology. A black hole is made of spacetime. Without spacetime there is no reality, which is ridiculous.
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
Avshalom was pretty aggressive and ignored what Tim was saying, however in the extended format discussion on ESIM channel, "Tim Maudlin and Avshalom Elitzur on the Nature and Flow of Time" where Tim got a chance to explain his positions better and more and to challenge Avshalom's ideas, towards the end Avshalom seems to be agreeing and wanting to learn from Tim. Sometimes debate oriented scientific discussion are not productive, even though are click baity.
Stuff-side of Life, is a Motion-Ocean, time is the 'shadow' of Motion. Time do Only exist in Consciousness of Living Beings, Life-side, Motion become time, and time become Time-spaces, periods, memoires in Memory. So, if there were No Motion, there would be No time. and if there were No Memory, there would be No time.
Spiritual science is one thing that modern scientists don’t want to accept, or believe cuz they don’t know how to verify or detect the spiritual energies and wavelengths which could lead to the visual materialisations like quantum physics, etc. with material equipments developed from the technologies available *at the present timeline*. So, what could be the cause such “additions” of data/information pieces in the universe? If one phenomenological/ psychological research or combined multi-disciplinary philosophical research topic is to assume spiritual energies and consciousness similarly in a way (not only materialistically), there might be more interesting answers emerging between material quantum physics and spiritual dimensions of quantum consciousness.
Maybe quantum theory operates at speeds greater than the speed of light and relativity applies to reality below the speed of light. It is similar to the difference between relativity and Newtonian physics
There are always hidden (undiscovered) variables. The physics of the very small has barely been touched on. For example: Rate of reactions depend not only in n time but heat, pressure, …, a quanta like an electron possesses angular momentum yet has no “spin” by definition. Here we are clearly missing something. There may be another need for string theory or something similar.
What about those experiments in quantum mechanics where doing something now alters something in the past? Is that compatible with time being closed of at now? Also those trainers are bangers.
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
@@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time The entire probability sphere of a QFT QM photon is the real object. A spherical implosion shockwave created by the drop of electron orbital. Ejection drops. Space rushes in at c Creating an expanding implosion wave.
Yes I think we are at the juncture that solves a lot of problems in physics all at once. We will find our way quicker, if we accept however, that there will be a universe of non-existence, and a universe of yes-existence. The black hole is likely destroying irrevocably the time and space and matter that belongs to it. A thinking, breathing human, exists beyond physics, they exist beyond their own mind.
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
Not so difficult to understand if you imagine the universe is inside a singularity (it is), then quantum entanglement is way easier to understand and to explain like the fact that the universe(s) is/are simulation(s)
As a social scientist I’d like to know the correlation between professional soccer player hair (IQ). It could reveal some pattern to inform the gap between special relativity and quantum theories 😅
if "some part" of time is affected by the product of our 3D body, is it become 4D? as we know that space-time is existed.. at least theoretically . anyone?
Actually, there's something beautiful about the multiverse because it explains the underlying container of the subjective existence of the spiritual energies, which seems only half byproduct of the living DNA.
If, Space-Time is 4th Dimension, then we are living in that Dimension. How comes we call this the third dimension? The third dimension does not have time included.
The blocks could be spheres! We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
Qur'an 70:4. Unto Him the angels and the Spirit ascend on a Day the duration of which is fifty thousand years. Qur'an 32:5. He regulates all affairs, from the heavens, to the earth. Then it ascends to Him on a Day the length of which is a thousand years by your count. Qur'an 22:47. And they ask you to hasten the punishment. But God never breaks His promise. A day with your Lord is like a thousand years of your count. Alhamdulillahi rabbi al'alameen
the hidden variables do exist and they are the trajectories of the particles in 3 dimensional space interacting with their pilot waves generated within the higgs field.
When God created the Heavens and the Earth, He created a block universe. Then, during the creation process, when He sees a scientist doing the double slit experiment using a detector behind the slit He looks at the result you get from the Schroedinger equation and says, “I need to produce a particle-like pattern on the screen”. And when there is no detector, He looks at the equation and says “I need to produce a wave-like pattern on the screen”.
No, time does not flow. Time is simply a measurement of events taking place. There is no time flow, time travel or any of the many fictional concepts of time in the same way there is no meter that is 5 meters long.
Time isn't a measurement. If it is you need to ask what is being measured and you are at an infinite regress. Time is being measured. We can say Time flowed for 5 minutes just as we can say the space between two objects is 5 meters.
THE ONTOLOGY OF TIME: One of the most misunderstood aspects of this space-time universe is just that - space and TIME. There are various extant theories of time. However, time is a very simple concept to grasp for one who has experienced his or her own timeless nature. This usually occurs during a meditation practice or during an awakening experience (see Chapter 17 to understand the notion of spiritual awakening). Possibly the easiest way to understand time, is to use the analogy of a movie. It may take a couple hours to watch a motion picture, yet the whole film is contained in the form of a single digital file (or in the case of older mediums, a reel of photographic film). The story of this universe may take hundreds of billions of earth years to complete, but from the perspective of eternity (literally, “no time”) it is not even as long as the blink of an eyelid. Indeed, it cannot be measured at all, for to measure a period of time requires a time-based metric! To use movie industry jargon, the story of this cosmos is already “in the can” (i.e. in the canister of film). This so-called “block theory” of time (otherwise known as “eternalism”) is contrasted with philosophical presentism, in which the present moment alone exists. In practical terms, time is the perception of a succession of physical or mental events (that is to say, time corresponds to phenomenal change). So, to succinctly summarize the philosophy of time, from the viewpoint of The Absolute, all time is contained within a pinpoint of eternity, yet from the perspective of conscious agents, there are no wholly past or merely future entities whatsoever. Read Chapters 08 & 11 to learn of causality and predestination. Cf. “time” in the Glossary.
@@onlynormalperson What I mean is that it does not flow. People misunderstand time as this malleable stuff that is tied to space but it's not. Scientists can be wrong too and in this case they are. Duration AKA true time is fixed for all entities everywhere. What is perceived about time in physics are false illusions based on how people have built their measurement devices. past events already happened for everyone everywhere at the exact same time but the effects of those events will differ based on where you are because of the distances involved and the fact that any effect must travel in space in order to affect other places.
Dude, these guys are the biggest jokes in academia. Kaku is only a professor because he was tenured before his life’s work was proven to be, at best, a “string” of errors. As an academic it’s on us to clean our own house of such quacks as it only reduces trust in science.
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
Avshalom is such a typical narcissist talking nonsense. Always sad not to cite Planck. He foresaw much of this and as the founder of quantum he should be deferred to or at least read.
Uncredible, that such an intelligent man like Maudlin can be that biased, not only about time, but about locality, too. Michio Kaku is just a clown talking beyond the topic. Elitzur got it right. It´s a pity, that the lady Jimena Canales wasn´t heard more, a fail of the hostess.
One thing is for sure. Is the grandfather paradox doesn't exist under a closed time loop. Why... Because if you put a warm holes near the point of event horizon and other in flat space. Once the bridge is created. You can never go farther back in time prior to the creation of the bridge. In furtherance, time still moves forward for both sides; with time dialation. Ie if 10 min have passed in reference to the bridge, near event horizon of black hole, you can never go to the creation of the bridge nor 10 min after the creation of the bridge. This doesn't prove time travel is possible but it negates the grandfather paradox, without invoking the multiverse.
This falls apart when you consider the 'path' taken between 2 blackholes orbiting each other... I suppose you couldn't go back further than when they started orbiting each other, but that is still WAY further back in time than maybe the beginning of life it's self...
@@alexwoodhead6471 though I was not refreshing that theory. I am assuming you are talking about two black holes and orbiting the black holes at certain vectors , actually gets you back prior to the time you began the course. Though it's a slightly different concept, in this scenario. I agree you can't go farther back than the orbits. But the question to the grandfather paradox is not about your existence but the creation of the mechanisms to transverse time. Again, this doesn't mean time travel is possible but the fact that grandfather paradox is averted; under certain scenarios. Still, you may create a bootstrap paradox, in a closed time loop; Negating any reference to a multiverse. You also can't approach it from your perspective, unless you created the anomaly. It's analogous to understanding a photon. You can't approach a photon by the anthropocentric but photonic centric. The photon doesn't care what you think. So the act of what created the anomaly can't be changed.
So the future is happening and the past is unhappening? The cat has a tail! How symmetrical. Happening is a very local phenomenon, the rules of the universe are universal. The universe is not. (Is Chess 'beautiful'?)
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
Should we care?! Is she serious. We’ve built the biggest machine ever created and spent billions of dollars just to find one particle. No one asked should we care. To try and merge quantum physics with special and general relativity seems like a lot better thing to care about.
Maybe it's the years of study in relative subjects to gain degrees, masters degrees to then gain PhD's in subjects they want to concentrate on and become expert in.
"There is no scientific debate about special relativity". M. Kaku. What a shockingly wrong statement! There is still debate about whether you will observe red shift in the less accelerated frame' from the more accelerated frame'. The accepted view is that you will see red shift, not blue sift, even though time passes faster there. I disagree. You MUST always see blue shift when you observe a frame' which is less accelerated than yours, because time runs faster and all events, like light waves, also cycle faster. It is accepted in general relativity in gravitational fields where you look down into the field and see red shift, (slower time), but look up in the field and you see blue shift, (faster time). There can be only one type of time dilation. Time is either slowed down or it is not. You cannot have it both ways. This mistaken belief has been dictated as an interpretation of the math, but there is no mathematical imperative that means time dilation is not reciprocal. Take this to its ultimate conclusion and a whole new physics emerges.
I got all of you beat. You are in a mathematical fantasy. The standard model is a collection of light fragments. My Smith-Borden Proton beats you all. E=TC2. X=π/E. You guys can't beat me.
Stop trying to create this umbrella "theory for everything." It's a nice thought, but it's not the right tree to be barking up. I don't think a universe this complex will be wrapped up in a pretty bow for scientists to make your life easier. Not everything needs to be put together. They could just be so different they are like different worlds or universes.
Of course Time flows, as Gravity flows as well. They are one and the same fluid Matter. But these merchants and cobblers of science, are light-years away from conceiving this fact.
Now why was my other comment removed? The previous comment even removed from my device about how I am made to endure isolation that inflicts pain no amount of outlawed isolitary confinement could ever inflict or be imposed onto my current state of awareness witnessing the damages that I would never tolerate which explains my OUTRAGE.
Don't be cheap, post full videos instead of luring us to your subscription model.
Don't be cheap, pay for the content.
@paulonius42 scientific education should be free for everyone! many other channels do that e.g. World Science Festival hosted by Professor Brian Green.
@checkmilu Science information should be free for all, but nobody should be obligated to spend their time educating you for free. In a debate such as this, the individuals are contributing their thoughts and time, and all the data they are discussing can be found freely. It's reasonable to pay people for contributing their own thoughts and time.
@paulonius42 scientists get paid for their research, raising public awareness of science should be their free contribution, if not people will turn elsewhere. I'd choose World science Festival and Closer to Truth channel any day over this greedy channel.
@@checkmilu Then go to those channels and stop commenting here. 🙄
9:27 Genius is seeing the obvious before others.
I really hope that we can solve the mystery between classical mechanics that make sense in everyday life and quantum mechanics that makes sense in a scientific level in my lifetime. Living to see quantum mechanics truly understood and having a simple explanation would be incredible. I cant wait, i hope we're smart enough to figure it out and it's not just simply above our cognition!
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
I mean superconductors and superfluids exhibit quantum effects on a macroscopic scale. Seems a good place to start.
I thoroughly enjoy the physics discussions on IAI. They are brilliant
Brilliant and lacklustre are RELATIVE. 😉
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
Our physics are not wrong, just incomplete.
Probably, but I think the job of philosophers should be to interpret reality in regards to the physics, rather than to refuse to interpret reality and insist the physics must be incomplete because it does not match with their preconceptions. The speculations about some alternative physics should be left to the physicists.
I say, completely wrong!
@@musicsubicandcebu1774 Whom shall we dispense first? Newton or Copernicus?
True incomplete and fragmented, we need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
It hasn't all been observed yet.
Quantum theory deals with various subatomic energy fields; in contrast, general and special relativity deal with macro events where by definition the energy fields have not just coalesced into matter - but have done so on massive scales, such as planets, solar systems and galaxies. Thus, gravity and the effect of mass (in bending the space-time fabric) has a huge effect while at the quantum level these forces have no effect as either the energy fields have no or too little mass to effect the space-time continuum. Thus, quantum and general/special relativity don’t really conflict but both represent reality - just at opposite ends of the same pole.
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
But paradores arise as they are incompatible, like the information paradox in which QM says information should be conserved however if information (matter) falls into a black hole, according to relativity, that information is lost, but QM says it should be preserved. Also QM says in a singularity quantum effects should govern, but QM can't acurrately describe gravity, so we can't acurrately describe what happends inside a black hole without a unified theory
@@dylan_silva6587 Relativity does not assert that information is lost, just because it’s within a black hole. The “information” (energy/mass) still exists undoubtably in some form but it’s largely inaccessible to an observer outside the black hole. However, it is accessible within the black hole. It all depends on one’s frame of reference, which is too say it’s all relative to where the observer is, ergo “relativity.” The greater “paradox” is that in QM gravity and mass play no role, but the scales are so small that the spacetime field is not appreciably warped or otherwise disturbed. In fact, when drilled down to the smallest elements, what was initially perceived of as a “particle” turns as to be really a quanta of energy and the so called “particles” are really behaving as a field of energy. Again, no real paradox, just differences due to scale and perspective. That said, there should be a way to describe mathematically the scale at which mass starts to play a role yet surprisingly so far no one has done so even tho it would be hailed as the “unifying” math between QM and relativity.
@@Ebobster No because black holes eventually evaporate due to Hawking radiation, but when they do, the information of the quantum systems is lost, that violates unitarity, which is a fundemental aspect in quantum mechanics
@@EbobsterNo, relativity says black holes evaporate due to Hawking radiation, but unitarity is violated as the information of the quantum systems is lost, unitarity is a fundamental aspect of QM, but in general relativity it seems to be violated as the information is lost
Time is simply a constructed unit of measure. Relativity refers to the point at which a measure is observed. Since the point of observation can be variable; so can relative measure be variable.
Time isn't a unit. We have units of time. Saying time is a unit begs the question unit of what?
@@onlynormalperson Not a unit, but a point of measure ... an instant of observation. For relativity, there must be more than a single point.
I think that just raises the same question. If time is a point of measure, what is being measured?@@patrickphelan5863
Time is a counter of Planck events, but don't quote me on that.
@@onlynormalpersonI don't know. You said we have units of it.
God, I wish I didn't have to work 40 hours a week. I'd love to spend my days researching this stuff, watching open source courses on the fundamentals of physics, while concurrently practicing and evolving my applied mathematics skills. Man, what a let down, seems I'll have to wait a couple decades, by which then my fluid intelligence will have been largely spent contributing to the capitalistic and neoliberal edifice.
Of course, I could pursue academia, but that's a game I don't have the character to partake in and enjoy.
Then do it. You’re energy and matter like everything else. Do what you would love to do. Make it up if you have to. Find your way. Create something that has never been before. Maybe it’ll be a new way for more than just you. Let your curiosity about the nature of reality be your guide through your own experience of it all.
@@ErnestoConfused See you at the rhe revolution Comrade! 🫡😉
The internet is your friend. At least for now
I mean, if you had the intelligence to be able to truly make scientific breakthroughs in physics/math, then you probably could find a way to make enough money in a few years and then never have to worry about money again.
Actually it's way simpler than most think. Time is often defined as the 4th dimension, isn't it? And dimension can actually be interpreted/expressed in another way as "permission". How so?
As we already know, the first 3 dimensions pertain to the 3D space of our physical universe. Matters/Particles found within this space have the ability to move in 3 different axes. That can also be defined as "3 distinct permissions" for the particles in space to move freely - in the X, Y and Z axes respectively.
Therefore, Time is simply another dimension (permission) that enables Matter to move freely in Space. It's that simple really, yet many are still perplexed by the concept of time due to partial or incomplete understanding of the origin of this universe.
Once we understand that dimensions are actually interchangeable term with permissions, "everything" in creation simply falls into place. Perfect clarity arises and seemingly abstract, mysterious, confounding concepts starts to make perfect sense. You see, for in the beginning, there is One who created and gave all these things the "permissions" to behave the way as they should, governed by the laws of physics. These laws didn't happen by coincidence, but were purposefully created by the Lawgiver.
Now, with ongoing research and tremendous advancement in technology, scientists are getting even closer to discovering what "reality" is all about. The space we once knew is no longer the only one in existence. Hyperspace is the new reality. Well guess what, this had already been revealed ages ago. The Author of the best selling and most distributed book in human history (according to Guinness World Records), stated that this universe we live in which can be observed/seen, came from that which can't be seen (Hebrews 11:3). With the advent of QM, only now we're discovering this had been a fact..a reality, all along. Hmm, isn't it such an exciting period of time we're living in?
Concerning the debate, ironically both Kaku and Elitzur are correct...with Elitzur being the more adamant one in his own exposition, haha. Time works differently at quantum levels because we're stepping into the realm of hyperspace...that is, spaces beyond our physical, observable space. We're doing a great job of "reverse engineering" our way back to the creation of our universe and progressively discovering that what's on the other side is governed by "additional, yet to be discovered" laws of physics. That's a really exciting prospect, to be honest...what a time to be alive!!
The block universe is indeed a reality (i.e. major world/cosmological events were already "written in the stars", as it were, waiting to occur at appointed their time). On a smaller personal scale, freewill DOES exist and it is therefore a reality too. Some sadly deny this fact/reality...prefers to classify this as mere illusion, along with time. Look, even a humble tiny little photon can exhibit particle duality, what more something of "greater magnitude in importance" like time, isn't it so? Hence, both scientists are absolutely correct, though it appears they can't seem to agree, with Elitzur being the more "adamant, strong-headed" one. Nice seeing this sort of debate though, even though the full recording isn't published for free. Thanks to the admin anyways..cheerio!
If time does not flow, How can we measure the speed of light ?
If the concept of time did not exist, it would be impossible to measure the speed of light. This is because the speed of light is calculated as the ratio of distance to time. Without time, there would be no way to measure distance either. This is because distance is defined as the displacement between two points, and displacement is defined in terms of the passage of time.
@@mathamour Precisely. Time does exist, just that it doesn't exist or is defined in the form most presume it to be. The flow of time is simply the enablement for particles/matters to move freely in space, thus enabling motion which we then observe and termed as "the passage of time". In the same vein, all higher dimensions (be it 8 or 11..i personally believe either one should be the most reasonable/logical numbers of real dimensions in existence) can be treated as "permissions or enablers" ...allowing exotic, unknown, yet-to-be-discovered particles to move and behave as they ought to within hyperspace.
Similar to our space-time continuum, higher dimensional space-time contains unknown particles which are "being enabled" to move freely and interact with one another, and yes even with our lower dimensional matters. Perhaps this accounts for dark matter actually is, sth which can't be seen yet it tangibly interacts with our physical matters in a very real, profound way.
One more thing worth mentioning, in that best selling/most distributed Book, it is mentioned there are at least "3 spaces or heavens" - the 1st, 2nd and 3rd heaven. The 1st heaven being our cosmos and 3rd heaven is the dwelling place of the Most High. Though the 2nd isn't being referenced directly, but is understood if there's a 1st and 3rd mentioned clearly, surely the 2nd exist as well. Hence a simple deduction can already be made that hyperspace is indeed a reality, without having to delve into deep mathematics or physics. The first verse from that Book sums it all, "In the beginning, the Creator created the heavens and earth." (Genesis 1:1) Heavens in its original text means "Shamayim", which can translated to mean sky, heaven or simply space...an empty place where all particles/matters of its respective realm forms everything which resides within that space. Thus from this single verse itself, it directly implies there is more than one space in existence.
Hope what's shared helps those who genuinely seek to understand the foundation of our universe and reality of hyperspace a little better... 🙂
@@hometheatre1706 "Excuse me, but I wasn't referring to time in a religious sense. In fact, I find the Bible to be full of contradictions, illogical arguments, and fantastical stories."
@@mathamour I know you're not referring to time in that sense. But at some point, philosophy (call it religion, fantasy, etc.) and science will inevitably collide as more discoveries are being made. Even top physicists and theoretical ones are getting more at odds with one another, even though incredible progress have been made in the recent few decades via scientific methods.
Anyway I'm just here to share with others what I've observed and learnt thus far from my own journey of discovering reality. Plus I'm not limiting myself to just purely one source of interpretation. The more I learn, it seems clear to me everyone with real intention to uncover the truth behind reality provides another missing puzzle to the big, grandiose complete picture. I'm personally convinced that one day, we will without a doubt fully understand the mysteries of hyperspace... And bet my bottom dollar it'll be stranger and wilder than fiction.
By the way, I'm sorry if I've offended you in anyway 🙏🏻...that's not my intention.
Cheers my friend, wishing you a blessed and happy life always! 🙂🥂
Ancient Greek philosophers and European theologians, not knowing the basic elements of matter and having no knowledge of the movements of celestial bodies outside the Earth, criticized scientists by making very fictional and comic-like remarks.
When we measure the length of an object, we simply measure the length with a ruler, and we do not say that it is long in a philosophical sense, that long is different from short, or that long is mysterious and short is not mysterious.
We simply want to know its length.
Time is mysterious because it is invisible to our eyes and cannot be touched.
However, we are asking for a scientific explanation of the nature of time.
We do not want to hear mystical fiction about time.
The idea that we can say anything about time because it is invisible is no different from the ancient Greek philosophers and medieval European theologians saying anything they want.
I am not a mystic, and philosophy is just a matter of opinion, so it is of no help in measuring the length and width of an object.
Although I do not blindly accept all tenets of physics, my discovery of numerous contradictions within the Bible, which no theologian has satisfactorily explained, prevented me from maintaining my Christian faith indefinitely.
what experiments is that he mentioned that quantm level it effect the past also ? how is it ?
@@frickzzpv I was wondering the same, now I need to investigate that, it sounds a very important discovery, right?
I was wondering the same thing, now I need to investigate it, it sounds like a very heavy discovery, right?
Retrocausality, not sure it's proven yet.
That's the delayed choice eraser experiment I believe, it's similar to the classical double slit experiment
I find it interesting that when discussing the ontological nature of the universe, they (the physicists), by their own calculations, have no idea what 95% of the universe is made of (as in "dark energy" and "dark matter") and the possible role those truly "hidden variables" may play in the deeper workings of reality.
Yes, but those 'hidden variables' will most likely be weirder than we can possibly imagine, or even hope to understand
They are dancing around a Theory of Time.
I wish one of the theoretical physicists would sit down with their thinking caps on, write down the properties of time, and write a mathematical theory defining those properties. Just like Newton did for all physical phenomenon he could measure.
for instance...
1. In order for C to be measured as a constant. Everyone has to experience time ticking at the same rate in all frames of reference. But at different rates when measured between different frames of reference.
Once a mathematical theory of time is established, I'll bet most of the confusion will be lifted.
How can one develop a mathematical theory about the speed of something
when the concept of speed entails material existents, time and movement
when movement of an object is only relative to another object and
there are an uncountable number of other objects and
time is a concept only?
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
@@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
Thus we agree that 'time' is a concept only?
@@REDPUMPERNICKEL depends on how you define time. It very much is a thing if you look at einstines relitivity
@@twa9995 Einstein uses the concept of time within his theory of relativity but
his using the temporal concept does not magically transform that concept into a "thing" in the universe.
Could somebody please put this entire discussion on RUclips so I don’t have to view it on that other crazy site?
This is the only way they can make money, since they’ve already been laughed out of science
8:36 go use a 3 way mirror with a 4th mirror-you will be in super position of all your quantum many worlds. Choose your experience, chart a course and in time you get there? 😊
Cute😅😅
glad they didn't let kaku interject. he would have confused matters as usual with unverifiable hyperbole.
he would begin with that he teaches x theory at x university
@@frailo1765 ...then something happens et voila, ThE mUlTiVeRsE!!111
There is a simple and elegant way to merge quantum mechanics and relativity and it is through integrating consciousness into the picture. Avshalom knows it and resents it with his whole being, for no real reason but fear. The situation is no different than what galillo and Copernicus had to endure in their time, only now main stream science, as it is, is the catholic church, and gallileo is David bohm and others who challange the stiff idea that consciousness has nothing to do with physical reality
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
@@rana8547
Exactly. But to be fair.. they'd be disbarred from their peer groups if they acknowledged it.
You are so right it hurts.
There’s more science in a flat earth convention than anything Kaku says.
Since most Kaku fans are probably flat earthers I need to point out that there’s no science in the Flat Earth community.
Time is an illusion albeit a persistent one.
The past exists only in the memory. A previous now.
And the future is a now that hasn't happened yet.
You can't exist in the past, you only have a memory of it.
And you can't exist in the future but only in an idea or image of what it could be.
You were present in your past, you're present now and you'll be present in your future.
Therefore all we have is the present.
👏 👏 👏
What a great discussion and terrific final point and jab at the multiverse!
I would watch it on your site id it didnt just buffer in SD quality for 20 seconds play 10 seconds of video and then buffer again. 😢
(1)There are no hidden variables. There are fundamental variables. I explain this with the electron on my channel here. (2) The notion that “we have experiments that proof” is not true. Often in quantum mechanics, experiments only “show” us what, it doesn’t explain “how” it happened. Lastly, “proof as I define it, is evidence, either in the nature of its presentation or a link to the actual occurrence that cannot be subjected to any reasonable opposing argument.”
Wow, your comment alone just got your channel one more subscriber! I'm seriously excited to check out your content! I'm new to this and so fascinated to learn more, so I appreciate the straight to the point, well-stated info you shared. 🙏🏽👩🔬
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
If this is true, and we could apply it to the larger scale of our own lives, that would mean that if we change our selves in the present, we are there for changing ourselves in the past, and the future as well? Very interesting concept to think of.
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
Can we get the full version please free
Link to his research?
Big question, what is time. Time is simply space within matter, that makes up matter traveling through the space of the universe.
The proposal by Elitzur to NOT try to unify the two theories sounds moronic. Definitely not a mark of a scientist but signs of a theologian.
Avshalom you are a brilliant person, there was no need to be rude towards kaku
Physics is stuck for a very long time. Scientists became influencer and media stars because Fantasy ideas are more sellable. What we need is fresh eye, better questions, young people who are not stuck in the past. Hydrogen Collider was a hell waste of money but idea was sellable. There are very few scientists like Roger Penrose who are bold enough to say they were wrong in the past. Very few are bold enough to admit.
One problem is that we use the classical space with quantum experiments. Three-dimensional Space is a classical construct. Then, there is Time. But, that, IMO, doesn't exist. I think a better approach is to postulate that existence is a Simulation. Start with that assumption as true and then reconcile the experiments within that box.
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
Time has consciousness.
Time is a form of energy, which has mass made up of a conglomerate of particles that form a consciousness.
Time flows because spacetime flows. If every particle in the universe ceased to exist, time would still flow. The ocean exists whether there are bubbles and waves on it or not.
Would it? The mathematics seems to support complete destruction of space time inside of a black hole, before it finally disperses.
@@AndrewMilesMurphy I would say that inappropriate maths is the bane of cosmology. A black hole is made of spacetime. Without spacetime there is no reality, which is ridiculous.
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
Avshalom was pretty aggressive and ignored what Tim was saying, however in the extended format discussion on ESIM channel, "Tim Maudlin and Avshalom Elitzur on the Nature and Flow of Time" where Tim got a chance to explain his positions better and more and to challenge Avshalom's ideas, towards the end Avshalom seems to be agreeing and wanting to learn from Tim. Sometimes debate oriented scientific discussion are not productive, even though are click baity.
Tim is worst discutant ever
Stuff-side of Life, is a Motion-Ocean,
time is the 'shadow' of Motion.
Time do Only exist in Consciousness
of Living Beings, Life-side,
Motion become time, and time become
Time-spaces, periods, memoires in Memory.
So, if there were No Motion, there would
be No time.
and if there were No Memory,
there would be No time.
Why people are being toxic about Kaku?
My thoughts exactly! The women especially are being so disrespectful towards him.
Agreed, the 10 minute snippets seem designed to lure you to pay for more.
It’s GROSS
Spiritual science is one thing that modern scientists don’t want to accept, or believe cuz they don’t know how to verify or detect the spiritual energies and wavelengths which could lead to the visual materialisations like quantum physics, etc. with material equipments developed from the technologies available *at the present timeline*.
So, what could be the cause such “additions” of data/information pieces in the universe?
If one phenomenological/ psychological research or combined multi-disciplinary philosophical research topic is to assume spiritual energies and consciousness similarly in a way (not only materialistically), there might be more interesting answers emerging between material quantum physics and spiritual dimensions of quantum consciousness.
Maybe quantum theory operates at speeds greater than the speed of light and relativity applies to reality below the speed of light. It is similar to the difference between relativity and Newtonian physics
Please look up Kaku, he’s a scam artist
Same argument with Ketchup vs Mustard. Then here comes mayonnaise
NO!
Time doesn't flow
Matter doesn't move
Energy doesn't apply force
Consciousness differentiates
There are always hidden (undiscovered) variables. The physics of the very small has barely been touched on. For example: Rate of reactions depend not only in n time but heat, pressure, …, a quanta like an electron possesses angular momentum yet has no “spin” by definition. Here we are clearly missing something. There may be another need for string theory or something similar.
Time is money, so.. Go with the Flow!
What about those experiments in quantum mechanics where doing something now alters something in the past? Is that compatible with time being closed of at now?
Also those trainers are bangers.
Time is a compactified dimension one single Planck second in size.
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
@@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time The entire probability sphere of a QFT QM photon is the real object.
A spherical implosion shockwave created by the drop of electron orbital.
Ejection drops.
Space rushes in at c
Creating an expanding implosion wave.
Yes I think we are at the juncture that solves a lot of problems in physics all at once. We will find our way quicker, if we accept however, that there will be a universe of non-existence, and a universe of yes-existence. The black hole is likely destroying irrevocably the time and space and matter that belongs to it. A thinking, breathing human, exists beyond physics, they exist beyond their own mind.
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
What is Kakadu doing there?
Not so difficult to understand if you imagine the universe is inside a singularity (it is), then quantum entanglement is way easier to understand and to explain like the fact that the universe(s) is/are simulation(s)
Great that four seated people can discuss time while Father Time watches.
As a social scientist I’d like to know the correlation between professional soccer player hair (IQ). It could reveal some pattern to inform the gap between special relativity and quantum theories 😅
if "some part" of time is affected by the product of our 3D body, is it become 4D? as we know that space-time is existed.. at least theoretically . anyone?
Matter moves in space. Time is merely the observation of this. Memory, observation, guess
Michio Kaku in the panel looks Zordon of Power Rangers. Trapped inside the screen 😂😂😂
No. Things change.
Do they experience all of this?
He did say there were NO hidden variables.
Actually, there's something beautiful about the multiverse because it explains the underlying container of the subjective existence of the spiritual energies, which seems only half byproduct of the living DNA.
If, Space-Time is 4th Dimension, then we are living in that Dimension. How comes we call this the third dimension? The third dimension does not have time included.
3 dimensions of space and one of time
We care about it because if a block universe is nature's ontology, we have an absolutely teleological reality, ....occasionalism.
The blocks could be spheres! We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
I have the feeling that they invite Michio to just make fun of him
Qur'an 70:4.
Unto Him the angels and the Spirit ascend on a Day the duration of which is fifty thousand years.
Qur'an 32:5.
He regulates all affairs, from the heavens, to the earth. Then it ascends to Him on a Day the length of which is a thousand years by your count.
Qur'an 22:47.
And they ask you to hasten the punishment. But God never breaks His promise. A day with your Lord is like a thousand years of your count.
Alhamdulillahi rabbi al'alameen
WOW, that got pretty violent!...
the hidden variables do exist and they are the trajectories of the particles in 3 dimensional space interacting with their pilot waves generated within the higgs field.
Nope, requires non-locality.
Cherenkov Radiation - matter travels faster than light 🚨
But,Dr. Kaku is a die-hard fan of Einstine.
When God created the Heavens and the Earth, He created a block universe. Then, during the creation process, when He sees a scientist doing the double slit experiment using a detector behind the slit He looks at the result you get from the Schroedinger equation and says, “I need to produce a particle-like pattern on the screen”. And when there is no detector, He looks at the equation and says “I need to produce a wave-like pattern on the screen”.
The ancient culture now seems to be understood. Akashic records
It's theory.
True, but I'm not sure I want to know it. I'm with Einstein, it's just spooky.
No, time does not flow. Time is simply a measurement of events taking place. There is no time flow, time travel or any of the many fictional concepts of time in the same way there is no meter that is 5 meters long.
Time isn't a measurement. If it is you need to ask what is being measured and you are at an infinite regress. Time is being measured. We can say Time flowed for 5 minutes just as we can say the space between two objects is 5 meters.
@@onlynormalperson, incorrect.
THE ONTOLOGY OF TIME:
One of the most misunderstood aspects of this space-time universe is just that - space and TIME. There are various extant theories of time. However, time is a very simple concept to grasp for one who has experienced his or her own timeless nature. This usually occurs during a meditation practice or during an awakening experience (see Chapter 17 to understand the notion of spiritual awakening). Possibly the easiest way to understand time, is to use the analogy of a movie. It may take a couple hours to watch a motion picture, yet the whole film is contained in the form of a single digital file (or in the case of older mediums, a reel of photographic film). The story of this universe may take hundreds of billions of earth years to complete, but from the perspective of eternity (literally, “no time”) it is not even as long as the blink of an eyelid. Indeed, it cannot be measured at all, for to measure a period of time requires a time-based metric! To use movie industry jargon, the story of this cosmos is already “in the can” (i.e. in the canister of film). This so-called “block theory” of time (otherwise known as “eternalism”) is contrasted with philosophical presentism, in which the present moment alone exists. In practical terms, time is the perception of a succession of physical or mental events (that is to say, time corresponds to phenomenal change). So, to succinctly summarize the philosophy of time, from the viewpoint of The Absolute, all time is contained within a pinpoint of eternity, yet from the perspective of conscious agents, there are no wholly past or merely future entities whatsoever. Read Chapters 08 & 11 to learn of causality and predestination. Cf. “time” in the Glossary.
Good counter argument @TheVeganVicar
@@onlynormalperson What I mean is that it does not flow. People misunderstand time as this malleable stuff that is tied to space but it's not. Scientists can be wrong too and in this case they are. Duration AKA true time is fixed for all entities everywhere. What is perceived about time in physics are false illusions based on how people have built their measurement devices. past events already happened for everyone everywhere at the exact same time but the effects of those events will differ based on where you are because of the distances involved and the fact that any effect must travel in space in order to affect other places.
These timewasters need to get a job.
😂😂
In reality general relativity is at odds with a lot of observations. Especially with measurements of big-G.
No..... It radiates.
Space-time-gravity......
When people will wake up? This teory was discovered 100 years ago. Let's change the paradigm, it is well past due.
Dude, these guys are the biggest jokes in academia. Kaku is only a professor because he was tenured before his life’s work was proven to be, at best, a “string” of errors. As an academic it’s on us to clean our own house of such quacks as it only reduces trust in science.
Maudlin bores me to death. Avshalom Elitzur is light years ahead of him.
Great video
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
It’s really funny how differently Tim is approaching this conversation. The vibes are very different, and I was uncomfortable watching!
IAI it looks ridiculous having an oversized absent person on a screen, you should shrink it to similar size of the stage members
Avshalom is such a typical narcissist talking nonsense. Always sad not to cite Planck. He foresaw much of this and as the founder of quantum he should be deferred to or at least read.
I love chickens, Eddy
Uncredible, that such an intelligent man like Maudlin can be that biased, not only about time, but about locality, too. Michio Kaku is just a clown talking beyond the topic. Elitzur got it right. It´s a pity, that the lady Jimena Canales wasn´t heard more, a fail of the hostess.
Michio Kaku is proof that not all clowns are scary.
What is that supposed to mean?
@@alexwoodhead6471 he's saying Michio is a crank with bad ideas.
@alexwoodhead6471 Either you're unfamiliar with Kaku's work or you're unaware that many people consider clowns scary.
People finding clowns scary is the premise of the guys joke@@paulonius42
@@alexwoodhead6471how do you not understand
One thing is for sure. Is the grandfather paradox doesn't exist under a closed time loop.
Why... Because if you put a warm holes near the point of event horizon and other in flat space.
Once the bridge is created. You can never go farther back in time prior to the creation of the bridge. In furtherance, time still moves forward for both sides; with time dialation. Ie if 10 min have passed in reference to the bridge, near event horizon of black hole, you can never go to the creation of the bridge nor 10 min after the creation of the bridge.
This doesn't prove time travel is possible but it negates the grandfather paradox, without invoking the multiverse.
This falls apart when you consider the 'path' taken between 2 blackholes orbiting each other... I suppose you couldn't go back further than when they started orbiting each other, but that is still WAY further back in time than maybe the beginning of life it's self...
@@alexwoodhead6471 though I was not refreshing that theory.
I am assuming you are talking about two black holes and orbiting the black holes at certain vectors , actually gets you back prior to the time you began the course.
Though it's a slightly different concept, in this scenario. I agree you can't go farther back than the orbits. But the question to the grandfather paradox is not about your existence but the creation of the mechanisms to transverse time.
Again, this doesn't mean time travel is possible but the fact that grandfather paradox is averted; under certain scenarios. Still, you may create a bootstrap paradox, in a closed time loop; Negating any reference to a multiverse.
You also can't approach it from your perspective, unless you created the anomaly.
It's analogous to understanding a photon. You can't approach a photon by the anthropocentric but photonic centric. The photon doesn't care what you think. So the act of what created the anomaly can't be changed.
So the future is happening and the past is unhappening? The cat has a tail! How symmetrical. Happening is a very local phenomenon, the rules of the universe are universal. The universe is not. (Is Chess 'beautiful'?)
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
It seems that all your theories are invalidated and you are resigning instead of finding the truth.
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
@@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time What is the speed of the light? Who and when measured it?
Should we care?! Is she serious. We’ve built the biggest machine ever created and spent billions of dollars just to find one particle. No one asked should we care. To try and merge quantum physics with special and general relativity seems like a lot better thing to care about.
Time is a myth
It's actually just a tool for measurement, nothing more, nothing less.
@@hsi2020 well said
❤
Please, get Jimenez Canales out of the group. Does she really understand relativity and quantum mechanics?
I have unified all the theory's, they are different at different scales. Done! Move on
This is the bottleneck with the simulator on the other side.
You can't unify wwe ufc and wbc. Fact!
I’ve heard better theories from stoners.what makes these people experts?
PhDs. Also I don't think they were conveying theories per se. I think they were interpreting theories like relativity.
Maybe it's the years of study in relative subjects to gain degrees, masters degrees to then gain PhD's in subjects they want to concentrate on and become expert in.
They are extreme leftists and anti capitalists.
"There is no scientific debate about special relativity". M. Kaku. What a shockingly wrong statement!
There is still debate about whether you will observe red shift in the less accelerated frame' from the more accelerated frame'.
The accepted view is that you will see red shift, not blue sift, even though time passes faster there.
I disagree. You MUST always see blue shift when you observe a frame' which is less accelerated than yours, because time runs faster and all events, like light waves, also cycle faster.
It is accepted in general relativity in gravitational fields where you look down into the field and see red shift, (slower time), but look up in the field and you see blue shift, (faster time).
There can be only one type of time dilation. Time is either slowed down or it is not. You cannot have it both ways.
This mistaken belief has been dictated as an interpretation of the math, but there is no mathematical imperative that means time dilation is not reciprocal.
Take this to its ultimate conclusion and a whole new physics emerges.
I wish that I liked to talk
I got all of you beat. You are in a mathematical fantasy. The standard model is a collection of light fragments. My Smith-Borden Proton beats you all. E=TC2. X=π/E. You guys can't beat me.
Stop trying to create this umbrella "theory for everything." It's a nice thought, but it's not the right tree to be barking up. I don't think a universe this complex will be wrapped up in a pretty bow for scientists to make your life easier. Not everything needs to be put together. They could just be so different they are like different worlds or universes.
I'm tired of Michio Kaku's string theory woo-woo.
Luoghi comuni
Of course Time flows, as Gravity flows as well. They are one and the same fluid Matter. But these merchants and cobblers of science, are light-years away from conceiving this fact.
Quantum Information and Quantum Entanglement are Fundamental.
Entropy increase.
Time is one way go forward....
Now why was my other comment removed? The previous comment even removed from my device about how I am made to endure isolation that inflicts pain no amount of outlawed isolitary confinement could ever inflict or be imposed onto my current state of awareness witnessing the damages that I would never tolerate which explains my OUTRAGE.
Click bait. Unsubscribed