X2 Technology™: The Foundation for Future Vertical Lift
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- Designed for speed, maneuverability and scalability, X2 Technology™ is the foundation for Lockheed Martin’s support to Future Vertical Lift. Sikorsky has invested in and proven X2 Technology™ to illustrate its commitment to developing future capabilities that are achievable and affordable for both military and commercial applications. Learn more: lmt.co/2o0OJQK
1:27 is the main rotor system really going to be that damn big? are you trying to trick the enemy radar in to thinking its a 747?
So I take it that the faster it flies using the rear propeller propulsive force the slower the main props will rotate to avoid the normal issues with the tips breaking the sound barrier?
Speed baby!
İt's just like a child's fantasy helicopter modification. 😃
Cheyenne
ruclips.net/video/OSdBFlLdMcQ/видео.html
Imagine a swarm of these, at night, armed with suitable small diameter guided bombs, dropping dozens on a high speed low level target run, coordinated to come in from every direction to a target from over the horizon.
interesting thought experiment. :)
👍👍👍👍👍
The nice cop.
👍👍👍👍👍👍
Put a 30 or 40 MM gun on it and fill the skies with them
Get back to me when you develop a platform that's better than an AH-64 Apache, Comanche, Cobra, and Blackhawk. Other than that it's just an also ran.
They remind me of the Kamovs. These Kamovs were known for these co-axial rotor helicopters.
„machine that can save lifes” 🤣🤣 Murica: the power of freedom 😂
Yes, this technology can save people's lives because it makes the helicopter faster and more maneuverable to make landings and take-offs faster.
If the technology is used for normal, mountainous or marine helicopter rescue it would be something extraordinary.
Even in the military field, it allows a squad of infantrymen to be pulled out of an area with a high density of fire more effectively than with current traditional helicopters.
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Helicopters that take off vertically what ever next planes that fly forwards?
We put weaponry on a "machine that saves lives". Funny guy.
SB-1 is a good looking helicopter, but sorry LM and Boeing, I believe that Bell V 280 will take the cake to replace blackhawks. But however, I think SB-1's attack variant will replace the AH64E.
bailey zhang isn't it meant to be one design for both.
Who you think would win 10 P-51s or 1 of these X-2s? The 10 p51s would be cheaper than one X-2.
this is very similar to the old Cheyenne project in the late 60s. Curious if this concept was built from that foundation I j see more streamline fuselage and dual rotor hubs - I think would haven given the Apache a run for its money and was years ahead of MDs design.
LOCKHEED built the AH-65 Cheyenne....
RocKiteman _ 2001 The Cheyenne was better in every way than the Apache except the Apache is more survivable and the computer technologies needed to make the Cheyenne safe to operate weren't really developed yet. Today the dual main rotor is more survivable than the dual tail and the computer technology has been perfected to a level that probably makes the X2/S97 easier to fly than a conventional helicopter while maintaining flight within the safety envelope designed for the aircraft.
New era of military aviation begins.
I don't know American greatest aircraft company from russian descendant
Make a civilian version which can carry a decent number of people.
it's like the helicopter is getting a complete redesign.😉
Is it possible to create a helicopter that (almost) makes no noise ? I don´t know anything about planes so sorry for my ignorance.
ThatsMeSuperMan there are various methods to make them quieter, like the ducted fan tail, and swept blade tips
But is it possible to make them as quiet as an electric car ?
ThatsMeSuperMan maybe, but as far as I know, nobody has figured it out yet
It's possible. RAH-66 is very quite
1:34 I have a bit more faith in the X-2 technology than in the joint strike fighter :')
China we ganna copy That the clone version is coming soon
Cool
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸Great America!!
do the America give an order for this for the army?
Its look good.
Where are the Chinese? Now is time to start copying..
Ah yes, Kamov
Wow - what a cool piece of tech!
Kamov should implement this coaxial rotor head design instead of that old rotor head.
Bro the new one looks shit. it may be preforming good but it makes a heli look retarded
@@11Tits bruh you serious ? This design is so sleek it's beautiful, almost blends in the body, what kamov used now gives the vibes of "I've no time so let me just find whatever I've in my garage and make something that just gets the job done", it's soooooo distasteful it almost ruins the looks of ka 52 (an absolute unit of a beautiful helicopter).
@@Василий-е3й2е bro the fucking domes on the rotors look like brain tumours on the heli, the ka-52’s rotor actually fits the heli copter. The X2’s body does look sleek but the brain tumours ruin it lol
I have never seen a helicopter fly like that.
Use a jet engine for forward thrust .. get rid of the rear prop ..
According to a Wikipedia page for the X-2 - linked below -that aircraft's *maximum* speed will be 288 M.P.H. At that speed, a propeller is adequate.
Moreover, in a dive, the propeller can {I presume} be put into a reverse blade angle, to keep the aircraft from overspeeding.
The old Lockheed AH-65 Cheyenne single-main-rotor helicopter used a rear propeller, and could put it in reverse to keep from overspeeding in a dive.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_X2
RocKiteman _ 2001 Also allowing a forward pitch attack angle, keeping weapons on target while not closing distance and altitude on a target position using rockets and guns.
Beautiful Design! what is its top speed?
It has a top speed of 481 km/h or 298 mph.
Good Job Lockheed, keep up the good work and continue to surpass everyone's expectations and redefine the impossible!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_X2
AH-64 replacement?
you should desing a new commercial aircraft
like a tristar 2.0
Just wow....
Russians had this helicopter ages ago
yeah right... somehow i do not see it being used in Russian military
actually the Russians tried to copy the old design the US had call Cheyenne attack helicopter which was abandoned for the MCD's Apache
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_S-69 see this
so,with an additional propeller at back,the highest speed are still lower than a normal configuration one(a modification of Mi-24Hind)?
как всегда военные себе все забирают
5th
Glory to Ukraine! Glory to Sikorsky, Kyiv!
Joint Strike Fighter is a dud
JSF still 20 years on in development...not even ready for combat service yet.
SR-71 Conceived on a napkin, Designed with a slide rule, Drawn on tracing paper in 1962....
13 June 1962: SR-71 mock-up reviewed by Air Force.
30 July 1962: J58 completes pre-flight testing.
28 December 1962: Lockheed signs contract to build six SR-71 aircraft.
25 July 1964: President Johnson makes public announcement of SR-71.
29 October 1964: SR-71 prototype (#61-7950) delivered to Palmdale.
...
21 March 1968: First SR-71 (#61-7976) operational mission flown from Kadena AB over Vietnam.
Do you have proof about this fake red flag ? Im mean real proof, not some bullshit that came out of a general.
You are naive if you take that as a proof. You are as lucid as a door if you think that the military industry is not manipulating the political structure. The f35 should do like the f22. A true combat exercise with a foreign country.
Do you seriously want to publicly compare this to the F-35? A grossly overpriced boondoggle that is inferior in every role to all the aircraft it's supposed to replace in that role?
Christopher Gaul Do you seriously want to announce your ignorance that shamelessly to the whole world?
No, you're doing a fine job of demonstrating your ignorance already, no need to duplicate your effort.
Meanwhile in the real world the F-35 is a sad commentary on government excess, greed, bribery, and design by committee. If it weren't for the fact that they were smart enough to spread the manufacturing out over enough states to get a lot of votes and pork for plenty of Congressmen, it would be dead and cancelled and replaced with more sensible upgrade programs for the aircraft it's intended to replace but never will. But even if it could, it's based on a disturbingly ignorant US "connected battle" strategy that is overly dependent on electronic data sharing. The USS Donald Cook incident has already proven that not only are the US's potential adversaries aware of this strategy and it's weaknesses, but that the already know how to defeat it and turn these overly expensive weapons systems into useless piles of junk.
Now add to that the fact that the F-35 can't do ground support half as well as an A-10 at an order of magnitude the cost. It can't out dogfight the F-15 at the same cost ratio and because of system like the one that took out the USS Donald Cook will force them to become individual fighters instead of integrated systems on a real battlefield, they'll be expensive missile fodder that's already been proven inferior when forced to fight conventional air superiority roles.
Oh, and all the planes it's meant to replace can actually fly in the rain, unlike the F-35.
But go ahead, spew your ignorant fanboy, rah rah, nonsense about how awesome the F-35 is.
Meanwhile, the X2 technology in this video is excellent and is the future of rotary aircraft and it denigrates it to compare it to the F-35.
Womp Womp Womp Waaaaaa
i would be interested to see how much you actually know... not think, KNOW..... about that man, and how much you just accept what strangers (to you) claim about him.
Christopher Gaul I lost it when you mentioned the Donald Cooke incident. You know that half of it is propaganda hogwash, right? The systems were not shut down and "all 34" sailors did not quit. Don't embarrass yourself. Dogfights? Really? What are you, 12? Meanwhile in the real world, the F-35 has a 20:1 record against adversaries including the F-15s and F-16s (Red Flag exercises, obviously ). Is the F-35 the best plane we could have had? No, it would have been better to make specialized airplanes for each role. However, the F-35 is better than any legacy fighter. Try sending an A-10 into contested air space, you're probably foolish enough to do so. The F-35 will be able to provide CAS where the A-10 won't . There's a shitload of stuff you don't know about the F-35. Stop trying to sound smart, your failing miserably. If you want to continue being igorant because it makes you happy, please do so. But take your misinformation and ignorance away from here.