@@alostcause4035That's not a slider, it's FSR 2 on the PS5. The Xbox version doesn't have FSR 2 as that technology didn't exist when the Xbox One X enhanced edition came out.
XBOX 360 and its games have garbage gamma levels. Microsoft clearly had no idea what they were doing as evidenced by them offering HDMI color levels in between the full and limited settings. Even worse is that neither of those settings look correct in most games. Sure it looks "punchier" but that's because there is no detail in near-black colors.
@@kunka592 I’ve played RDR on the PS3 when it came out, played the same game later on the 360, 360 was way better. On the PS3 you could not see anything in interiors.
@@LayerZlayer2000 shimmering. Same difference. Literally referenced in the video as a problem on xbox and a reason that the ps version is superior according to Df.
Personally i think the ps4/ps5 looks best but xbox definitely has the better version since they have multiplayer. A shame they couldn't just bring the mp over from the og versions
You enhance the xbox version and get full 4k image by pressing the two cheese and menu buttons together and you can change the image settings. It looks pretty much bang absolutely no jagged edges, plus you can pick it up for a fiver. This dude obviously hasn't changed the settings.
Lol the amount of cope in this comment section is incredible. He’s clearly playing the Xbox version in the 4K mode since it literally defaults to it. If he was on Performance instead of Graphics the game would be in 720p and you’d see massive jaggies all over the place. You’re the one who has no idea what they’re talking about. Set your game to Performance and tell me it looks anything like this video. The level of ignorance in this comment section is baffling.
I thought red dead redemption on the series consoles were at 60 and 120 because it's two gens back, at least id think 60 but that wasn't the case. This game could use it definitely!
It's already number 1 sold game in PS store. We that expected a lot more than a basic port are the minority. Rockstar knows that there's a giant majority of people that played and finished RDR once or twice two generations ago and really want to play it back now. These casual gamers are the majority and have no problems shelling 50 bucks for a basic port.
@@electrikoptikJesus that’s depressing. There’s no chance in hell publishers will learn a ‘lesson’ when they see zero negatives to behaving this way I mean they really have essentially just….well they haven’t done a damn thing, and yet they’re making nearly as much money as if they’d developed a new game. Insane.
It is worth mentioning that the ps5 version is an upscaling "remaster". The xbox version, on the other hand, only has a cross gen compatible mode, so for example the distance display has not been optimized for certain details. However, there is a lot of optimization potential here. In the end, it's still a cool feature to just throw the 360 disk into the Series X and get started.
I started playing multiplayer on ps3 4 days ago and it is amazing not sure if its on xbox one/series s/x but i know that it isn't on ps4/5 which is a big loss because you have to pay more for less
*Sony Interactive Entertainment / Bandai Namco / Microids: $30 remakes* - _Medievil / Pac-Man World Re-Pac / The House Of The Dead_ *Sony Interactive Entertainment /Activision / THQ Nordic: $40 remakes* - _Shadow Of The Colossus / Spongebob Squarepants Battle For Bikini Bottom Rehydrated / Tony Hawk Pro Skater 1 + 2 / Crash Bandicoot N-Sane Trilogy / Spyro The Dragon Reignited Trilogy / Crash Team Racing Nitro-Fueled_ *Capcom / Electronic Antichrist / Square Soft: $60 remakes* - _Final Fantasy VII, Resident Evil 4 / Dead Space / Resident Evil 2_ -Rockstar:- $50 13 year old port! One of these things is not like the others, one of these things deserves to be dead!
Xbox version is definitely clearer, sharper and well textured in every which way as per this video you have shared. Yet you say the opposite... Are you the typical console cultist? Either way, thanks for your video, this helped me decide that I'm going to buy it on Xbx then. It's lower priced also on Xbx.
Series x has that strange 360 filter that oversaturates colors,blacks,etc but still looks good. I prefer the old look makes the sun brightness on everything look more accurate.
I wait for deals. I got the RDR1 and RDR2 bundle with undead nightmare and all add-ons for $50 on Xbox Series X. Not bad, I don't think. There is no way I'm paying $100 for these two games.
The PS5 version looks marginally better to me, especially around aliasing/shimmering, but mostly I'm shocked at how similar they look. The PS5 obviously has the potential to do better, so while this is partly a testament to how great Microsoft's backwards compatability work has been, its mostly a reflection of just how lazy this port is.
Is anyone really surprised? This company is milking the shlt out of its products. GTA5 released back in 2013 on PS3... they didnt even release a new gta for an entire ps4 generation. Just rereleased the same GTA5 over and over and over again. Pathetic. Not to mention that this company hasnt changed its controls and camera issues since PS2 days... they use still the same idiotic auto aim and changing targets with the d pad, not to mention the amazing... "tap X to run"... and before someone tells me that you can remove the auto aim, you know very well that the game and the combat and the way enemies behave is built around auto aiming...
@@martinramirez9647 exactly. It’s too blurry especially on the pro with their badly implemented checkerboard rendering. Xbox One is rendering at 900p with blurry TAA
The PS5 version is better, but it's also way more expensive. Those upgrades do not justify the massive difference in price between the two versions. If FSR 2 was added to the Xbox version they'd be more or less identical. So for me, as I own both consoles, the Xbox version is still the go to because it cost me £8. The PS5 version will set me back £39.99. No thanks. Not until it goes on a deep sale. Also the PS5 has no multiplayer, a feature that is present in the cheaper Xbox version.
Why do you guys try and find anything just to say the ps5 is better? Read the comments....the xbox original /cheaper version clearly is sharper and has better colours. Considering a developer hasnt touched it 20 years thats pathetic. You shouldnt be praising that crappy new re-release.
This review is a classic example of being so hyper- focused on one detail (anti- aliasing, in this case) that the overall point is ignored/ dismissed. The PS5 version looks washed out, gray, and the "smoothing effect" is so excessive that it looks blurry. Personally, I don't care which system people buy or choose to play this game on....but the Xbox wins in this particular beauty contest.
i have both consoles, so have the 360 upscaled version on series x, was thinking about getting it on ps5, the only thing ps5 looks better in is shadows imo...not worth it
Outside of the better aliasing, this only has showed me how little effort was put into this game. Remember, you are playing 90% of the original price for only 75% of the game. Pirate this shit for Xenia. Rockstar doesn’t deserve your money.
Xbox fanboys are diehard fanatics for the brand. Xbox is almost a religion to them. Facts do not matter. If it’s Xbox then it’s better no matter what. You see it all over social media. Much less Xbox’s sold than PlayStations but for some reason the Xbox fans base is rampant online.
@@ak740_ I never understood being loyal to a piece of plastic or namebrand. To me it's all about the games. I own all 3 mainline consoles. If there is a game I want to play I play on each system for said access of that game. If I choose to play the same game on a different console it's because it's the best version. And I also take what DF says more seriously then any xbox or playstation fanboy any day of the week.
Lots of cope in the comments. I’ve played both versions and you immediately notice the ps5 version looks better. You can dislike the 50 dollar price tag but the fact remains
I really need to get a series x, I have the ps5, but there are games I want to play and the series x can play games I used to play on the 360. I know it’s not what this video is practically all about, but man I’ll pay $500 for the Xbox sx, and 5-6 games for the price of 1 for the ps4-5…..
That’s what I did. I have a PS5 for new releases but bought a Series X specifically to play older games. Mad Max, Far Cry 4, Assassins Creed: Unity, RDR2, etc. The PS5 just doesn’t offer any benefits when playing last gen games. It’s a shame.
I never got to play the first Red Dead and I beat RDR2 last year. For me as someone who never owned a ps3 or 360, I would gladly pay the full price. And money spent on this gives me more value compared to a certain hyped up game released 2 years ago.
@@sellingacoerwa8318don’t disrespect RDR1 it’s still so much better than most other modern games and is a must play especially if you like the Setting. But no 60fps is a huge disappointment.
off topic but can anyone lock rdr1 at 60 frames in rpcs3. i change v blank 120 and lock 60 in gpu settings and im getting fucking 23 frames max at macfarlanes ranch. i got a 5 3600
Lol uhh this comparison makes no sense as it’s a 30fps PS4 port that doesn’t have a native PS5 version. It was made for PS4, not for PS5, so why aren’t you comparing PS4 vs Xbox One?
PS4 Pro is not on par with a Series X which is what you are implying. If the framerate was unlocked, XSX would be running far higher fps than PS4 Pro. The Series X version is running Xbox One code, not Series X native code.
Greedy and lazy Sony says hell no or "F.U!" to its fans by not having a proper (and free) backwards compatibility program like on the Xbox, instead opting for that crappy cloud based solution that you have to pay for. Rockstar know this, so they do the absolute bare minimum and charge the absolute maximum for it. So its L after, L, after for PlayStation owners, and in mind that's great? The mental gymnastics people do to defend corporations that don't give a sh!t about us 😂
Listen, im a PS fan boy but ps definitely lost on this one. We dont even get the MP component of the OG versions. Graphically i prefer the PS5/PS4 versions but in terms of content, Xbox wins.
@@Kingofconsoles54 let me put it in a way that your simple mind can understand. more content = better game. The campaign is the same on both consoles so that doesn't matter.
Better antialiasing on the PS5, but is it just me or the PS5 looks slightly blurrier?
I agree, wonder if the FSR is too aggressive or if it's rendering at a slightly lower resolution, or both.
exactly! the PS5's is blurry...like a lower resolution. and yet he says he looks better...?
@@krissrockprobably a problem with the video
For me also, xbox version looks sharper.
Yes, Xbox looks sharper because 2xMSAA is not blurry like FSR2
What's he smoking? The XSX looks sharper and cleaner (less blurry) than the PS5.
No it doesn’t
@@Jay053 the F is does not! lol
@@jackburton307 what?
you need glasses man
@@nxbad9706 oh the irony 😆
The only extra enhancement is the asking price.
It's cool for 20 bucks hell no to 50
Its cool for free.
Its cool for free
I can buy it on ps3 for 5 bucks on disc
It's cool for ps3
oh is it for 50?
Is it me or do the colors look more vibrant on the xbox
Yes but trolls will still disagree
Someone said there is a slider in settings you can tweak to fix that.
@@samza9622 its all I could focus on, they should at least have tried to match it in this comparison. I did see the AA etc.
@@mikeuk666theres a slider to fix that. But no slider for the constant shimmering and flickering on xbox.
@@alostcause4035That's not a slider, it's FSR 2 on the PS5. The Xbox version doesn't have FSR 2 as that technology didn't exist when the Xbox One X enhanced edition came out.
I prefer the colors and contrasts of the Series X.
XBOX 360 and its games have garbage gamma levels. Microsoft clearly had no idea what they were doing as evidenced by them offering HDMI color levels in between the full and limited settings. Even worse is that neither of those settings look correct in most games. Sure it looks "punchier" but that's because there is no detail in near-black colors.
@@kunka592 I feel like the Xbox version has better contrast. The ps5 version looks too gray and blacks look lifted.
@@kunka592 I’ve played RDR on the PS3 when it came out, played the same game later on the 360, 360 was way better. On the PS3 you could not see anything in interiors.
You can change that in the menu on the Playstation release. It has brightness, contrast and saturation settings.
@@jorchmoreno7980 You can make it look exactly like the Xbox version, it has PQ tweaks in the menu to bring the blacks down and boost saturation.
Looking at the footage side-by-side, The colors look a bit muted on the PS5 version...
There is a saturation slider in the visual settings which amends that issue it looked really muted on default
@ianwood6438 does it also remove the blurring on everything? 😮
@@mikeuk666how do you get rid of the constant flickering on xbox?
@@alostcause4035flickering there ain't any
@@LayerZlayer2000 shimmering. Same difference. Literally referenced in the video as a problem on xbox and a reason that the ps version is superior according to Df.
Xbox version looks better has multiplayer and cost less.
The original not re release
Personally i think the ps4/ps5 looks best but xbox definitely has the better version since they have multiplayer. A shame they couldn't just bring the mp over from the og versions
@@RealBDice42true xbox really always have been the best Version even nowadays
Xbox has a lot of things that are actually better, but fanboys are blind, anyways enjoy.
@Jactional there's no re release on xbox
Yeah I’d rather just play this on back compatibility on the series x, not paying extra just to play this on my ps5
60 fps now.
@@2genders-tk2ueit’s already 60 on series x
@diamond_dogs you’re right, just played the two versions and it’s a big difference
@@simgarfups5 is blurrier right?
@@JayAzle not imo
It actually does look a lot better
Yal are blind if you believe ps5 rdr looks better literally I'm a ps5 owner and even I say series x looks more vibrate and more clarity
I’ve found it that way for most games I’ve played on both
Jagged edges and pop ins. Cope. Playstation wins.
1:16 is a prime example of better colors and lighting on Series X.
You can increase the saturation and contrast on ps5 in the games settings if you want that look
I already have rdr1 on disk for 360 and a Series X, this just gave me a reason to replay the game again haha
I'm doing the same thing. It's almost like a whole new game on Xbox x.
You enhance the xbox version and get full 4k image by pressing the two cheese and menu buttons together and you can change the image settings. It looks pretty much bang absolutely no jagged edges, plus you can pick it up for a fiver.
This dude obviously hasn't changed the settings.
Performance or graphics mode? Also no way to enable 60 fps huh?
Lol the amount of cope in this comment section is incredible. He’s clearly playing the Xbox version in the 4K mode since it literally defaults to it. If he was on Performance instead of Graphics the game would be in 720p and you’d see massive jaggies all over the place. You’re the one who has no idea what they’re talking about. Set your game to Performance and tell me it looks anything like this video. The level of ignorance in this comment section is baffling.
I prefer the contrast on the Xbox releases, but the FSR 2 really does a great job of cleaning up those telephone lines.
Xbox version looks better to me.
@AlakaiTheAc3 to many people
@ivanexell-uz4mvcuz it is
huh? the ps5 version looks blurry and lower res...?
The xbox version shimmers and flickers constantly. Thats much worse.
Nope look great at 4k and better shadow Xbox looks worse
no it doesn't?
@@luigiluigi8086 go and watch DF
No it doesn't xbot
60fps patch for PS5 and people would have been happy!
I thought red dead redemption on the series consoles were at 60 and 120 because it's two gens back, at least id think 60 but that wasn't the case. This game could use it definitely!
Even the Switch could handle 60fps in this game.
If the game was priced better then everyone would be happy
@Neptonx someone said that the animations were tied to the 30 fps in another rdr remaster video.
Won't come
Xbox backwards compatibility is still king and a great feature
Looks better on Xbox
No it objectively doesn't
@@MichaelM28 its better on xbox
@@anthonylacayo2731 No it isn't unfortunately.
@@nxblnxbl yes it is
Great video guys. The Series X looks better to me.
I picked up the Xbox version for $9.99. PS5 version might be a bit better, but it's also $50.
no it´s not “a bit better”. xbox has multiplayer
Better in what? Xbox version still has online, ps5 doesn't
Playstation games never look contrasted , they have always look washed out and grey since the first ps
Man I used to watch my dad grind the heck out of RDR1 Multiplayer and this game still looks good
despite all the tech talk according to 2020 vision the xbox one looks better
I can't stand the blurry grey look.
Ps5 looks cloudy and washed out
X still looks better too me
I love how this all exciting for people
Xbox version has been doing this for years
I feel bad for ps gamers, $50 for a 13 year old port with no multiplayer
It's already number 1 sold game in PS store.
We that expected a lot more than a basic port are the minority. Rockstar knows that there's a giant majority of people that played and finished RDR once or twice two generations ago and really want to play it back now. These casual gamers are the majority and have no problems shelling 50 bucks for a basic port.
@@electrikoptikThe mainstream and casuals ruin everything, as it always the case
@@electrikoptikRockstar isn't even who did the port. It was another company just like GTA Definitive Edition
@@electrikoptikJesus that’s depressing. There’s no chance in hell publishers will learn a ‘lesson’ when they see zero negatives to behaving this way
I mean they really have essentially just….well they haven’t done a damn thing, and yet they’re making nearly as much money as if they’d developed a new game. Insane.
No. You should feel bad for the idiots who would pay that amount for the game.
The Xbox version looks better, and i am not paying anything more for a game i already own 🤔
What about Switch version ?? I heard it runs 1080p in docked mode and 720p in handheld mode
That’s a hard limit set by Nintendo for power consumption
@@dvxAznxvb and the switch can't do better really
See SwitchUp review
Fake news. More like 640p in docked mode and 480p handheld mode
It is worth mentioning that the ps5 version is an upscaling "remaster". The xbox version, on the other hand, only has a cross gen compatible mode, so for example the distance display has not been optimized for certain details. However, there is a lot of optimization potential here. In the end, it's still a cool feature to just throw the 360 disk into the Series X and get started.
lighting is way better in series x which makes the game more visually appealing .
Looks like they converted the X360 version to PS4.
That’s exactly what they did
How’d you know?
I started playing multiplayer on ps3 4 days ago and it is amazing not sure if its on xbox one/series s/x but i know that it isn't on ps4/5 which is a big loss because you have to pay more for less
I’ve played multiple of the same games on ps5 and series x the resolution always seems better on my series x not sure why but that’s my experience
ps5 version is at 60fps, xbox series stays at 30. Big difference
Other than fps, series x is infinitely better imo
*Sony Interactive Entertainment / Bandai Namco / Microids: $30 remakes* - _Medievil / Pac-Man World Re-Pac / The House Of The Dead_
*Sony Interactive Entertainment /Activision / THQ Nordic: $40 remakes* - _Shadow Of The Colossus / Spongebob Squarepants Battle For Bikini Bottom Rehydrated / Tony Hawk Pro Skater 1 + 2 / Crash Bandicoot N-Sane Trilogy / Spyro The Dragon Reignited Trilogy / Crash Team Racing Nitro-Fueled_
*Capcom / Electronic Antichrist / Square Soft: $60 remakes* - _Final Fantasy VII, Resident Evil 4 / Dead Space / Resident Evil 2_
-Rockstar:- $50 13 year old port!
One of these things is not like the others, one of these things deserves to be dead!
Xbox version is definitely clearer, sharper and well textured in every which way as per this video you have shared. Yet you say the opposite... Are you the typical console cultist?
Either way, thanks for your video, this helped me decide that I'm going to buy it on Xbx then. It's lower priced also on Xbx.
Don't like that fog like overview that that ps5 has, it makes the xbox look sharper and brigther.
PS5 is so much better. Xbox has is so shimmery and 4K 60fps is exclusive to PS5
Xbox has 4k120fps if your tv can handle it it definitely has more raw power
So basically FSR2 here is used like DLAA.... Keep resolution at native but use FSR2 to improve AA
Series x has that strange 360 filter that oversaturates colors,blacks,etc but still looks good. I prefer the old look makes the sun brightness on everything look more accurate.
@@samza9622I feel like the Xbox version has better contrast. The ps5 version looks too gray and blacks look lifted.
I wait for deals. I got the RDR1 and RDR2 bundle with undead nightmare and all add-ons for $50 on Xbox Series X. Not bad, I don't think. There is no way I'm paying $100 for these two games.
The PS5 version looks marginally better to me, especially around aliasing/shimmering, but mostly I'm shocked at how similar they look. The PS5 obviously has the potential to do better, so while this is partly a testament to how great Microsoft's backwards compatability work has been, its mostly a reflection of just how lazy this port is.
Very well said
Is anyone really surprised? This company is milking the shlt out of its products. GTA5 released back in 2013 on PS3... they didnt even release a new gta for an entire ps4 generation. Just rereleased the same GTA5 over and over and over again. Pathetic. Not to mention that this company hasnt changed its controls and camera issues since PS2 days... they use still the same idiotic auto aim and changing targets with the d pad, not to mention the amazing... "tap X to run"... and before someone tells me that you can remove the auto aim, you know very well that the game and the combat and the way enemies behave is built around auto aiming...
It is just the PS4 version with 0 enhancements, SeriesX also did a great job, but we really hopped for a propper PS5 SX remaster.
Series X looks more vibrant.
But with more black crush
@@MichaelM28still clueless I see
Someone said you can fix that with a slider in settings.
That's auto HDR. It applies HDR to non HDR images. PS5 just wraps the non HDR image in a HDR wrapper, it doesn't convert to HDR like Xbox does.
you mean more oversaturated
You know what looks good? Red dead redemption 2.
Only on PC or Xbox Series X
@@Crimsongz are you saying red dead redemption 2 doesn't look good on PS4 nor Xbox one?
@@martinramirez9647 exactly. It’s too blurry especially on the pro with their badly implemented checkerboard rendering. Xbox One is rendering at 900p with blurry TAA
@@Crimsongz and this piece of shit from 2011?
@@CrimsongzIm playing RDR 2 in PS5 and it definitely looks much better than on PS4
This porting “effort” is pathetic. There is no excuse for the game not to run at 60fps. Shame on you rockstar, charging $50 for this, what an insult.
@@TheQuietWolf_believe me, if you’ve played a game that offered you to switch between 30 and 60 fps, you’ll know the difference
Now they have 60fps option.
@@foret4a874 now they have 60 fps option.
But it's free on xbox if u have the 360 version
Xbox back compat still the best
Uh, no. The whole point of the video is that the ps version is better here.
More stable image on PS5. Your comment doesn't undermine the work and analysis DF put in.
The PS5 version is better, but it's also way more expensive. Those upgrades do not justify the massive difference in price between the two versions.
If FSR 2 was added to the Xbox version they'd be more or less identical.
So for me, as I own both consoles, the Xbox version is still the go to because it cost me £8. The PS5 version will set me back £39.99. No thanks. Not until it goes on a deep sale.
Also the PS5 has no multiplayer, a feature that is present in the cheaper Xbox version.
No it isn't xbot
PS5 now has 60 fps
while true.. wonder how much better it is. Dont think it worth paying full price for the game.. just wait for a sale...
@@SC-lc7tmIt does make aiming much better. There was a noticeable input lag at 30fps plus the stick mapping felt non-linear.
Why do you guys try and find anything just to say the ps5 is better? Read the comments....the xbox original /cheaper version clearly is sharper and has better colours. Considering a developer hasnt touched it 20 years thats pathetic.
You shouldnt be praising that crappy new re-release.
20 years?
@chrisspeed270 i presume my guess was wrong, so please correct me as you feel the need to leave a smart ass comment.
@@djlbergg bro. how dafuck you thought that rdr was made in 2003
Why is this on DF clips? It’s is a comparison. Not a clip.
I prefer the shadows on XSX. They're way too harsh on PS4.
This review is a classic example of being so hyper- focused on one detail (anti- aliasing, in this case) that the overall point is ignored/ dismissed. The PS5 version looks washed out, gray, and the "smoothing effect" is so excessive that it looks blurry. Personally, I don't care which system people buy or choose to play this game on....but the Xbox wins in this particular beauty contest.
i have both consoles, so have the 360 upscaled version on series x, was thinking about getting it on ps5, the only thing ps5 looks better in is shadows imo...not worth it
Wait… the video abruptly stopped at 4:38.
This is their clips channel
@@joesladden9914 ok
Outside of the better aliasing, this only has showed me how little effort was put into this game. Remember, you are playing 90% of the original price for only 75% of the game. Pirate this shit for Xenia. Rockstar doesn’t deserve your money.
Xbox series x is just xbox 360 version
W Xbox Version
DF says the new port in Playstation looks better.....everyone in the comments says Xbox looks better lol. Why is that?
Xbox fanboys are diehard fanatics for the brand. Xbox is almost a religion to them. Facts do not matter. If it’s Xbox then it’s better no matter what. You see it all over social media. Much less Xbox’s sold than PlayStations but for some reason the Xbox fans base is rampant online.
@@ak740_ I never understood being loyal to a piece of plastic or namebrand. To me it's all about the games. I own all 3 mainline consoles. If there is a game I want to play I play on each system for said access of that game. If I choose to play the same game on a different console it's because it's the best version. And I also take what DF says more seriously then any xbox or playstation fanboy any day of the week.
a bunch of xbox fanboys in the comments
Any improvements to the Audio?
Not sure what he is seeing the Xbox looks way better its not even close
Lots of cope in the comments. I’ve played both versions and you immediately notice the ps5 version looks better. You can dislike the 50 dollar price tag but the fact remains
I really need to get a series x, I have the ps5, but there are games I want to play and the series x can play games I used to play on the 360. I know it’s not what this video is practically all about, but man I’ll pay $500 for the Xbox sx, and 5-6 games for the price of 1 for the ps4-5…..
That’s what I did. I have a PS5 for new releases but bought a Series X specifically to play older games. Mad Max, Far Cry 4, Assassins Creed: Unity, RDR2, etc.
The PS5 just doesn’t offer any benefits when playing last gen games. It’s a shame.
I never got to play the first Red Dead and I beat RDR2 last year. For me as someone who never owned a ps3 or 360, I would gladly pay the full price. And money spent on this gives me more value compared to a certain hyped up game released 2 years ago.
Same here. Never had the chance nor the finance to own a ps3/x360 back then but now, after more than a decade, I really enjoy it on my PS5 and 4K TV!
For $50 dollars you could buy Remnant 2 full retail price, if you played RDR2 you already played everything great about the first red Dead done better
@@sellingacoerwa8318 That’s a completely terrible take. Red Dead Redemption has always been a true masterpiece of its own.
@@sellingacoerwa8318don’t disrespect RDR1 it’s still so much better than most other modern games and is a must play especially if you like the Setting. But no 60fps is a huge disappointment.
L
Hoping for 60 fps patch but doubtful
Huge disappointment if it isn't
To me the ps5 seems blurry
According to this side by side the xbox looks better. Hes wiggin
Looks better on the series X. Sadly no 60 FPS like the PS5 version.
O que percebe-se é que no PS5 o ambiente é mais escuro e denso, já no Xbox X a paisagem é mais viva e bem iluminada
Just got red dead for 10 dollars for Xbox 360 and it has multiplayer why buy it on ps there's no reason to
Idk man Xbox looks a lot more clear
Hmmm.... PS5 @ £50-60..... with 30fps.....erm no!
Just ordered it from CEX for £8 🤣👍🏻
Bespoke
wow Playstation finally grew grass 🙃
Likely grass in GTA V on Xbox One was horrible but it finally grew in Series X and S versions
Xbox looks better
FSR2 is BLURRYYYYYYYYYYYY
and the xbox version is jaggy as hell, i'll take the blur any day
Are we looking at the same clips?? Series X looks much better 🤣 Spec Savers mate.
xbox is locked to 30fps which sucks
We all know oliver is clearly ps biased but how can he say with a straight face the ps5 version looks better
I personally like x box series x more.
off topic but can anyone lock rdr1 at 60 frames in rpcs3. i change v blank 120 and lock 60 in gpu settings and im getting fucking 23 frames max at macfarlanes ranch. i got a 5 3600
Xbox looks better.
This is best port of all time!
Rockstar know how to make those.
Series X looks better imo
Ps5 looks like dogshit
Lol uhh this comparison makes no sense as it’s a 30fps PS4 port that doesn’t have a native PS5 version. It was made for PS4, not for PS5, so why aren’t you comparing PS4 vs Xbox One?
Xbox One version is 720p lol. Xbox One X is 4K and this is the One they are comparing against, but running on XSX which looks the same
Lol
It's crazy that the PS4 pro version is on par with the Series X version...
PS4 pro is still a beast!!!
PS4 Pro is not on par with a Series X which is what you are implying. If the framerate was unlocked, XSX would be running far higher fps than PS4 Pro. The Series X version is running Xbox One code, not Series X native code.
Lmao 😂. That's the Xbox one x version. It's been 4k on Xbox for years.
There is no Series X version.
Series x running 360 omg ps fans 😂
4K on a 13 years old game wow what a beast
PS5 wins as usual
Nope, take this L toxic ps fanbaby troll
50 dollars for an old ass game is considered a win somehow?
By paying for something Xbox got at no extra cost?
This is a L. W for xbox back compat
Greedy and lazy Sony says hell no or "F.U!" to its fans by not having a proper (and free) backwards compatibility program like on the Xbox, instead opting for that crappy cloud based solution that you have to pay for. Rockstar know this, so they do the absolute bare minimum and charge the absolute maximum for it. So its L after, L, after for PlayStation owners, and in mind that's great? The mental gymnastics people do to defend corporations that don't give a sh!t about us 😂
ps5 version look better
Wait a Minute!!! PS5 Remake VS. XBOX 360 Backward? Really 😂
Ps5 wins again!!! Another L for the weakbox series x fanboys!
How? Series X didn't get an updated game. This is a comparison of the PS5 vs the Xbox 360.
Listen, im a PS fan boy but ps definitely lost on this one. We dont even get the MP component of the OG versions. Graphically i prefer the PS5/PS4 versions but in terms of content, Xbox wins.
@RealBDice42 you act like people cared about the multi-player for a single player game 😂
@@Kingofconsoles54 let me put it in a way that your simple mind can understand. more content = better game. The campaign is the same on both consoles so that doesn't matter.
@RealBDice42 no one plays red dead for online. They play for story. Therefore weakbox series x still takes an L.