@@clearsight655 seriously lol hahaha it’s always the thing said and I’m like really? Is there nothing else? Plus yeah these days most people watching these vids aren’t able to afford so many flights they need to deploy agents imo
@@brianWreaves something tells me it won't do the hard part of finding the best route/price, and then filling out the forms etc. It will just do what Kayak does and find some flights for you.
Agree, i'm just surprised that Matt didn't understood yet what "apple intelligence" really is. The ability to sell an inferior product at a higher price just by mastering the propaganda, and they do it again and again, 16 count so far.
But this was all huge news! I too am tired of those intros from here and Matt Wolfe, but then I listen to it all, and I’m like… ok yeah, that was huge news. No? It’s crazy how week after week I keep getting shocked and I study this shit near full time every day
@@entropystar80231 Almost all YT thumbnails / titles are clickbait nowadays. It probably helps with views / money, but doesn't necessarily mean the content is crap.
If you put your content into the public space it becomes public knowledge. There is no difference between a person summarising public information and an AI doing it. The argument is a non sequitur.
The issue is the level of access. If you meet Joe Blow at an event, he currently can't just snap a picture of you and get all of the negative details about your life. But that is coming soon.
I was doing some research of course with Chat GPT, about Tesla's vehicles and I found out that at one point in time they were using directional sonar in order to scan the road but it was too expensive, I told them instead to just put regular directional microphones on the undercarriage of the car and just use an AI model to determine a larger map the cameras can't even see. It would be cheaper, would probably break less, and it would add a layer of security. Human beings do not just use their vision when they drive. Your hearing is actually really important when you're driving.
I tweeted elon, or x'd....and told him to just doing flying cars that use google maps, so that they are flying the exact same pathways and you just lock them in. done. im going on break
We also have a brain with a cerebral cortex that has an estimated 60-240 trillion synapses. The human brain is organized into neural networks of 100 neurons (probably around 700,000 synapses). It has 300 million of these networks, organized hierarchically. The current largest LLM we have has an estimated 1.8 trillion parameters (function as synapses). It could probably not drive a car safely on all roads using only cameras for input. If you wanted to try it anyway, to run inference, for one vehicle, you would need in the region of 13-25 server racks, pulling 70-140 kw. Do you think Tesla could fit that into a car? Tesla FSD is nothing but hype, designed to make one man (narcissistic autist) as rich and powerful as possible. Waymo is the real deal.
@@antonystringfellow5152 Wait, you think with cameras you would need 25 server racks to control a vehicle, but simply by adding Lidar it's suddenly easily doable for an onboard computer? You paid by Google or something?
I think that we will have more sensors than cameras when Tesla FSDs have accidents another sensor would have prevented. The latest version of FSD is very capable even with just cameras, which is very impressive!
Great content but want to recommend revisiting your self lighting set up. Consider a ring light camera config-ideally you want self lighting nearly straight on (not three point lighting, which you want for your set/stage) and angled slightly above eye sight line on your face so the light casts slightly downwards on you. This is what we do for models on set, removes shadows on the face.
Long before Anthropic and Google, a couple years ago I built a JARVIS-like bot to take screenshots of my display and use various algorithms with YOLO to fully control my pc. Not difficult but extremely time-consuming for me at that time. It's actually easy nowadays with the new hardware processing power hat yolo can run on.
Yeah and probably way better. Perplexity is just a gpt reskin. 50% of the time with more in depth research questions it just gives up and says ‘listen dude I’m just a openai api call, cant do much for ya”
💥THE BEST AI NEWS CHANNEL - Congratulations, Matt, you got a news format that has tons of the most important news, concise script, no lose of time like Mattvidpro, which talks so much nonsense. Your format is for us, people which don't have time to lose, and need the latest news with short examples, and comments beforehand, your experience in using them, so that we don't lose our time on bad apps. Continue this format and the pace is excellent. Tons of useful information. A real masterpiece on how to make good RUclips videos. 🎉❤❤❤
Apple leasing an AI model and rebranding it as "Apple Intelligence" is the most Apple thing of all time. This company truly stopped innovating when Steve passed.
Matt, do you ignore the announcements? Image generation should come with 18.2, other features with 18.3 and 18.4…. And - EU will get support with 18.3 or 18.4 and it was never the AI Act or DMA, although Apple claimed this publicly. To port this to several languages is the real problem. Honestly: even 70b models do have serious troubles to “understand” German and other - more complex - languages… The promise was a public beta with 18.1. And this was done.
@ what has the taxes thing to do with AI act, MDA and other data protection laws? No company wants to pay taxes anywhere, it would be a miracle if Apple was different. 😁 But as I saw on my invoice, VAT was calculated and paid.
re: COPYRIGHT @ Matthew: 1. If a student were to go to their local library and watch your videos/read your articles as part of their PhD research, how would you feel about that? 2. If you were one of hundreds, thousands or even millions of authors and creators the person learned from, how would you feel about that? 3. The student earned their PhD, and creates some new technology for the world, eventually writing a paper of their own. You MAY (or may not) be cited depending on how much content came from you, uniquely. How would you feel about that? 4. Assume that the student has eidetic memory....does that change your response? Personally, if a model derives a significant portion of its response from a single source, then it should provide references to the sources. Incidentally, I would like to see references to give these models credibility...especially where research, laws, facts, etc. are used to give a response weight. Otherwise, the idea that ONLY humans may derive new works from the existing works of other humans will never endure. At what point do humans have to start providing references to genAI created content? Haha.
Vision only systems have to deal with sensor issues. Like from the sun. Self driving systems should at a minimum include front and rear radar modules. Probably ultrasonic sensors as well (they are cheap). LiDAR seems like a nice to have, not a must have.
@@lordnikon6809thx. i stay for a few reasons for the iphone including mainly the ecosystem. if you know you know. i am in punta cana my favorite place other than my home in new jersey 🇺🇸
@matthew_berman when it comes to AI and your own content, I mostly agree with your statement about "I want the option to decide if AI ingests my content or not", but I would add one extra step to that. I think the rule should be, you should be allowed to choose if AI ingests your content or not, but by default the option is for AI to NOT ingest your content", so that way your content is protected by default and you can choose to allow it if you wanted to. At the moment the default is that the AI can just take your content, which means it might already have ingested your content before you even set the option so that it isn't allowed to. The same sort of thing used to happen with Google when you published a page, but you hadn't setup the robots.txt or meta tags yet. Google could add your page before you told it not to.
The camera only argument makes no sense. What is wrong with cameras PLUS other sensors if the other sensors help with limitations of cameras (like the example you pointed out), ignoring costs (which will probably come down)
We dont only have eyes. We use our ears and can feel the road beneath us and we have social understanding that allows us to interact with human drivers. But even ignoring that, why limit yourself to just our senses when we often start off acknowledging that human drivers arent great and we'd prefer better? Why not use new senses that accommodate for where we fall short? If we want to improve as much as possible, why allow our humanity to still be the asymptote? Idk thats where im at on that
I think the claud update for controlling your computer is a massive deal due to it could solve the context window problem for large programs. Progressed in the rite direction this could be the Deven tool we wanted.
It's funny because I just saw a video on Reddit where a Tesla on fsd just plowed through a deer without stopping because it's cameras couldn't see far enough in the dark to figure that out. Yeah, we need some other sensors too to augment safety! 😅
I think glasses are the best form factor already? They are super easy to wear, and already exist in society. The best way to get a constant display in your vision is to wear glasses? Everyone acting like glasses are a bad form factor like there are millions of people who already have to wear glasses. How do you think they feel? 🤣 It's already a tried and true form.
Leading scientists in the field of autonomous driving don't see the approach of Tesla with vision only as too promising. And to be honest most of us could probably agree that our vision is quite inssufficient in challenging weather and light conditions...
Apple has historically committed to only releasing things when they are really solid. Remember how long it took for cut and paste? I don’t think they will do the nice fast and break shot approach that we saw did not work well for Google…
What a dilemma for Google. "Google" the search engine product - and the brand - would have to attack itself with an Agentic search tool, because when they do that, they will cannibalize their own legacy search engine. And its revenue model. The reaction to agentic search will be very dismal if the agent compiles great answers for you and liberally intermixes them with Ad services. How will they resolve that dilemma? (Answer - they might not and the future of google might depend on something other than search...)
I’m pretty sure they have a solution ready to go that they are just waiting to release, but are doing a cost benefit analysis given the 9x higher cost to deliver results.
wait, the TSMC "production record", was that after a lot of employees quit and they were (are) having a major hr shortage? when was that comparison made? 🤔
Installed it yesterday hoping for decent Open Ai like voice chat with Siri and it's actually worse than the old Siri for me. it now hangs on 95% of questions I ask it, Siri just sits there with the icon showing it's lisening but nothing happens. Underwhelmed is accurate.
The thing is fixed cameras may not provide enough info for autonomous driving. Digital sensors have always been worse than the human eye. Driving requires focal points, dynamic exposure through adjustable aperture. If these camera were DSLR's with pivoting motors it could make sense. The most important thing in driving is looking were you are going. Its vary important in motorcycle riding because momentum keeps you up so anticipating and looking into a corner is needed to not looking everywhere and driving forward.
That being said the vehicle and computer can project physical properties like speed, steering position and anticipate position but without strong depth perception it would be stuffed knowing were the most important place to look is.
I completely get your point about not wanting AI to copy your content.... But the tricky challenge with AI is that it is not a scraping bot, but more like a person (brain) watching your video, it will not copy paste, but rather assimilate and remember key points just like humans do. Regardless of how powerful and talented that brain is, is it fair to block it from watching what you have made public to other humans?
Don't understand why browser control is considered difficult, not why screenshots (and mouse "emulation") are used. (chrome/firefox/edge)-devtools-(frontend) Eg (ie) chrome-devtools-frontend Panel extension, websockets, code injection (inject a repl), all the access to browser, the dom, events, the console, local overrides and the PC it is running on, through (all of) the browser, browser extension and devtools apis.
I'm not using google much at all now. It's chat GPT 4.o. It can be a bit sassy and keeps ending my questions with a question of it's own. I told it that asking questions all the time at the end is not normal communication. It didn't give a damn.
re: copyright... My feeling is that if it's legal for a human to do it it should not be illegal for an AI to do it. Just because the LLM is faster and more comprehensive shouldn't make something legal, illegal. So if it's legal for me to go to your YT channel, consume your video, and then write my own take on it in a blog, I don't see why that same activity would be illegal just because an AI does it.
I have no idea how you all can stand how bad perplexity hallucinate. Every time i have tried to use it. It made up so much s it was infuriating to work with. Don't you not even notice that it hallucinates? Or how can you stand it?
Notification rollups are definitely a standout feature, but Apple's AI feels like a letdown compared to the hype. The false advertising really made it seem more revolutionary than it actually is. Hopefully, future updates deliver something more substantial. Anyone else disappointed by this?
Yes, let’s race toward every conceivable AI tool and product, turning our entire technological landscape into a Nexus system, accelerating headlong into AGI. I may not have a PhD, but I can confidently say that this path risks the very end of our species. Apple prioritizes safety over profit when it comes to AI, and there’s solid reasoning behind certain features not being integrated yet - primarily for security and safety.
We don't yet have close to the intelligence in AI required to drive a car safely on all roads. We can do it but our cerebral cortex has about 100X the scale of the largest LLM and is several orders of magnitude more complex in its structure. It's made up of neural networks containing around 100 neurons each (up to 700,000 synapses in each network) and it has about 300 million of these networks. If you think the smartest LLM we currently have could achieve FSD (I don't) then all you need to do is figure out how to fit in the region of 13-25 Nvidia server racks, along with a 70-140 kw power supply into a car and you're ready to go! Good luck with that!
AI starts clunky then beats you up if you don't use it after a few months. I really appreciate the snapshot of where it is but I hesitate to discount it yet
18.2 is supposed to bring more "Apple Intelligence". However, this was never going to be the seller that Apple hoped it would. I'd much rather keep my AI out of my OS.
Spoken like someone who doesn't know what to do with AI right now. I have the opposite problem, theres too much useful AI out there, and still much room for improvement. We are only at the start of the bubble, and while many projects will fail, many new fortunes are yet to be made. Mark my words.
While I am watching this, I get a notice that Claude can now run code? "We are introducing the analysis tool, a new built-in feature for Claude ai that enables Claude to write and run JavaScript code. Claude can now process data, conduct analysis, and produce real-time insights. Think of the analysis tool as a built-in code sandbox, where Claude can do complex math, analyze data, and iterate on different ideas before sharing an answer. The ability to process information and run code means you get more accurate answers-building on Claude 3.5 Sonnet’s state-of-the-art coding and data skills." You are not done working for the day, lol. Ok, lol. I see further on, you talk about that a bit.
15:23 We only have eyes for sensory input?? When was the last time you looked in the mirror? Humans have something like 14 senses. You know the big 5. But for human navigation, we also have equilibrioception (balance, spatial orientation), proprioception (body position and movement), nociception (pain), thermoception (heat), mechanoreception (vibration), interoception (internal bodily states), and echolocation (sound reflections, rare).
Sorry, but putting OpenAI's Advanced Voice Mode instead of Siri would mean giving OpenAI access to *all* of your private data and that is an absolute no-go.
100% agree that RUclips and other platforms should add channel metadata so that creators can choose to allow AI training to utilize their content or not.
I’m kinda selfishly sad that MS is going the platform agnostic route, as that was one of the main selling points of the AI tools we have been building. Now I have to stop telling people to avoid MS for this reason. Hmmm
Yes, not impressive for those of us accustomed to a dedicated ai. But i think apple intelligence will gradually find its place … snd, for instance, there will b convenience from not having to go off to a different app for basic ai functionality
10:45 If the information is out there, "FAIR USE" starts to take hold. If someone is simply reporting that you made a video with certain information, it is no longer copied, it is a derivative. It doesn't matter if it's used in AI or a News blogger. Same with art. If it learns to "paint" from looking at a Bob Ross painting, it's no different than my 5-year-old doing the same thing. NOW..... If it simply regenerates exact replica's of art or content, there is an issue. But this isn't happening.
the meme about companies is fun but misses another reality. it's no use to burn cash with 10 people searching everywhere in the wrong place, it's more efficient to have 1 person digging at the right spot so that the 10 others will all focus on their specialized task when they are required :)
16:59 Has Google not learned anything from Microsofts Recall's sh*itstorm? Who in their right mind would allow Google to continuously take screenshots of their desktop, upload them into the cloud and give an AI permission to make unsupervised purchases with their credit card?
I paid good money for an iPhone 15 just for Apple Intel So far Extremely unimpressed All I want is Advanced Voice as Siri All I want is Advanced Voice as Siri All I want is Advanced Voice as Siri
hm.. on the one hand you say cars should just drive by vision like us, but then you say Chromes AI shouldn't act just by vision like us but read the code ... Your car argument is perfectly applyable here too ;P Reading the webside's code is good for now, but outdated for tomorrow
When my brain stores a represntation of a watched video in my brain, that is not copyright infringement. When I duplicate your work close enough to infringe your copyright you have legal recourse for that. Its exactly the same for AI. If someone financially harms you, by say, creating a competing channel with identcal derivative content, you already have full recourse under the present set of laws. I really dont see the problem here. No new laws are required. Just use the system already present to protect you.
what's so special about the Claude update? it's not running the code server side, it's just another client side "artifact", right? It generates javascript but running it in the client machine (browser).. Nothing really new here, it's still limited to ReactJS or plain javascript/html, no other frameworks or libraries etc., still limited in context size (the csv that you "upload" just to be pushed back in your browser for the javascript it generates).
Why so many AI agents want to book flights for you? How many flights do people book each year?!
@@clearsight655 seriously lol hahaha it’s always the thing said and I’m like really? Is there nothing else? Plus yeah these days most people watching these vids aren’t able to afford so many flights they need to deploy agents imo
most of these are for corporate execs, so those people. lol
About zero for me
It's not the quantity, it's the onerous process of flight & price searching that the agents will be able to free us from.
@@brianWreaves something tells me it won't do the hard part of finding the best route/price, and then filling out the forms etc. It will just do what Kayak does and find some flights for you.
best ai channel news! fast no bs lingering bs. just the essentials you need to catch up with !
Agree, i'm just surprised that Matt didn't understood yet what "apple intelligence" really is. The ability to sell an inferior product at a higher price just by mastering the propaganda, and they do it again and again, 16 count so far.
Yup
Lmao it’s always huge AI news with you
exactly what I saw. I give up this channel, ridiculous and click bait.
But this was all huge news! I too am tired of those intros from here and Matt Wolfe, but then I listen to it all, and I’m like… ok yeah, that was huge news. No? It’s crazy how week after week I keep getting shocked and I study this shit near full time every day
"Huge News" is the new "Shocking"
@@entropystar80231 Almost all YT thumbnails / titles are clickbait nowadays. It probably helps with views / money, but doesn't necessarily mean the content is crap.
If you put your content into the public space it becomes public knowledge. There is no difference between a person summarising public information and an AI doing it. The argument is a non sequitur.
I wish it was that simple
The issue is the level of access. If you meet Joe Blow at an event, he currently can't just snap a picture of you and get all of the negative details about your life. But that is coming soon.
I was doing some research of course with Chat GPT, about Tesla's vehicles and I found out that at one point in time they were using directional sonar in order to scan the road but it was too expensive, I told them instead to just put regular directional microphones on the undercarriage of the car and just use an AI model to determine a larger map the cameras can't even see. It would be cheaper, would probably break less, and it would add a layer of security. Human beings do not just use their vision when they drive. Your hearing is actually really important when you're driving.
I tweeted elon, or x'd....and told him to just doing flying cars that use google maps, so that they are flying the exact same pathways and you just lock them in. done. im going on break
We only have eyes for driving. We also crash in fog, heavy rain, badly lit roads, when objects have low contrast vs the road.
We also have a brain with a cerebral cortex that has an estimated 60-240 trillion synapses.
The human brain is organized into neural networks of 100 neurons (probably around 700,000 synapses). It has 300 million of these networks, organized hierarchically.
The current largest LLM we have has an estimated 1.8 trillion parameters (function as synapses).
It could probably not drive a car safely on all roads using only cameras for input. If you wanted to try it anyway, to run inference, for one vehicle, you would need in the region of 13-25 server racks, pulling 70-140 kw.
Do you think Tesla could fit that into a car?
Tesla FSD is nothing but hype, designed to make one man (narcissistic autist) as rich and powerful as possible.
Waymo is the real deal.
Panik
@@antonystringfellow5152 Wait, you think with cameras you would need 25 server racks to control a vehicle, but simply by adding Lidar it's suddenly easily doable for an onboard computer? You paid by Google or something?
I think that we will have more sensors than cameras when Tesla FSDs have accidents another sensor would have prevented. The latest version of FSD is very capable even with just cameras, which is very impressive!
thank you for keeping me up to date man i come here every day!
Great content but want to recommend revisiting your self lighting set up. Consider a ring light camera config-ideally you want self lighting nearly straight on (not three point lighting, which you want for your set/stage) and angled slightly above eye sight line on your face so the light casts slightly downwards on you. This is what we do for models on set, removes shadows on the face.
Long before Anthropic and Google, a couple years ago I built a JARVIS-like bot to take screenshots of my display and use various algorithms with YOLO to fully control my pc. Not difficult but extremely time-consuming for me at that time. It's actually easy nowadays with the new hardware processing power hat yolo can run on.
Google Search will become like perplexity. And they have already the users. It's a matter of time.
Yeah and probably way better. Perplexity is just a gpt reskin. 50% of the time with more in depth research questions it just gives up and says ‘listen dude I’m just a openai api call, cant do much for ya”
Agreed.
💥THE BEST AI NEWS CHANNEL - Congratulations, Matt, you got a news format that has tons of the most important news, concise script, no lose of time like Mattvidpro, which talks so much nonsense. Your format is for us, people which don't have time to lose, and need the latest news with short examples, and comments beforehand, your experience in using them, so that we don't lose our time on bad apps. Continue this format and the pace is excellent. Tons of useful information. A real masterpiece on how to make good RUclips videos. 🎉❤❤❤
Apple leasing an AI model and rebranding it as "Apple Intelligence" is the most Apple thing of all time. This company truly stopped innovating when Steve passed.
Matt, do you ignore the announcements? Image generation should come with 18.2, other features with 18.3 and 18.4…. And - EU will get support with 18.3 or 18.4 and it was never the AI Act or DMA, although Apple claimed this publicly. To port this to several languages is the real problem. Honestly: even 70b models do have serious troubles to “understand” German and other - more complex - languages… The promise was a public beta with 18.1. And this was done.
I am very confident Apple didn’t want to pay taxes in Europe and is acting now like a child. A very questionable behavior!
@ what has the taxes thing to do with AI act, MDA and other data protection laws? No company wants to pay taxes anywhere, it would be a miracle if Apple was different. 😁 But as I saw on my invoice, VAT was calculated and paid.
Good news aggregation! Saves me hours of catching up
I love Perplexity AI as well for search, and exploring topics in depth. Amazingly good and useful.
Great job, Matthew. Would love to see your top 10 investment ideas in AI. Cheers
One Love!
Always forward, never ever backward!!
☀☀☀
💚💛❤
🙏🏿🙏🙏🏼
re: COPYRIGHT @ Matthew:
1. If a student were to go to their local library and watch your videos/read your articles as part of their PhD research, how would you feel about that?
2. If you were one of hundreds, thousands or even millions of authors and creators the person learned from, how would you feel about that?
3. The student earned their PhD, and creates some new technology for the world, eventually writing a paper of their own. You MAY (or may not) be cited depending on how much content came from you, uniquely. How would you feel about that?
4. Assume that the student has eidetic memory....does that change your response?
Personally, if a model derives a significant portion of its response from a single source, then it should provide references to the sources. Incidentally, I would like to see references to give these models credibility...especially where research, laws, facts, etc. are used to give a response weight. Otherwise, the idea that ONLY humans may derive new works from the existing works of other humans will never endure. At what point do humans have to start providing references to genAI created content? Haha.
Vision only systems have to deal with sensor issues. Like from the sun. Self driving systems should at a minimum include front and rear radar modules. Probably ultrasonic sensors as well (they are cheap). LiDAR seems like a nice to have, not a must have.
thx matthew b!
from my apple 15 max pro with apple ai. i don’t even notice any changes :/
and greetings from dominican republic 🇩🇴 😎🏝️
iPhone es solo un nombre. Hasta sus usuarios se están dando cuenta. Dominicano desde US.
@@lordnikon6809thx. i stay for a few reasons for the iphone including mainly the ecosystem. if you know you know. i am in punta cana my favorite place other than my home in new jersey 🇺🇸
14:41 you’re correct, but there is a deal with TSMC that the latest chips are made in Taiwan still, and the other fabs are on an N-1 cadence
@matthew_berman when it comes to AI and your own content, I mostly agree with your statement about "I want the option to decide if AI ingests my content or not", but I would add one extra step to that.
I think the rule should be, you should be allowed to choose if AI ingests your content or not, but by default the option is for AI to NOT ingest your content", so that way your content is protected by default and you can choose to allow it if you wanted to.
At the moment the default is that the AI can just take your content, which means it might already have ingested your content before you even set the option so that it isn't allowed to.
The same sort of thing used to happen with Google when you published a page, but you hadn't setup the robots.txt or meta tags yet. Google could add your page before you told it not to.
The camera only argument makes no sense. What is wrong with cameras PLUS other sensors if the other sensors help with limitations of cameras (like the example you pointed out), ignoring costs (which will probably come down)
Agreed…Apple Intelligence very underwhelming. Expected Siri to offer more but alas. Turned off Apple Int. and Siri.
"Huge News" is the new "Shocking"
We dont only have eyes. We use our ears and can feel the road beneath us and we have social understanding that allows us to interact with human drivers. But even ignoring that, why limit yourself to just our senses when we often start off acknowledging that human drivers arent great and we'd prefer better? Why not use new senses that accommodate for where we fall short? If we want to improve as much as possible, why allow our humanity to still be the asymptote? Idk thats where im at on that
I think the claud update for controlling your computer is a massive deal due to it could solve the context window problem for large programs. Progressed in the rite direction this could be the Deven tool we wanted.
Thanks!
Thank you amigo
Google is always behind, but they usually win in the end. Because fast to market isn’t always better.
Thanks for info.
I agree with you about Meta's Orion glasses. I do NOT see this as being the form factor that most people will want.
True, claude did solve the co-ordinate issues pretty nicely however the context window for remotely useful work still runs out
It appears that there are updates in the response settings for Claude, now offering "Concise" and "Full" response modes.
It's funny because I just saw a video on Reddit where a Tesla on fsd just plowed through a deer without stopping because it's cameras couldn't see far enough in the dark to figure that out. Yeah, we need some other sensors too to augment safety! 😅
The deer was already dead.
The AI model knew it was dead and made the right call. Smash deer.
Glasses feel like it to me (besides bmi) because it’s the only thing you don’t have to hold. Do you have any other ideas though?
A star Trek communicator pin
An earring
A hat/headband
... Fanny pack?
I think the most practical given the current technological limitations would be an over-the-air Bluetooth earpiece with a camera in built into it
Don't get me wrong though for what it's worth I love the glasses and would happily jump straight into that lol
@@Chronicles_of_Tomorrow earrings would be sick totally
I think glasses are the best form factor already? They are super easy to wear, and already exist in society. The best way to get a constant display in your vision is to wear glasses?
Everyone acting like glasses are a bad form factor like there are millions of people who already have to wear glasses. How do you think they feel? 🤣
It's already a tried and true form.
Matthew, I need to talk to you regarding your video about Miles! This is very important!
I thought you were going to say you needed to talk to him about his cars extended warranty 😂
Leading scientists in the field of autonomous driving don't see the approach of Tesla with vision only as too promising. And to be honest most of us could probably agree that our vision is quite inssufficient in challenging weather and light conditions...
The rapid boom of AI has just shaken the whole ecosystem of Apple. In my POV This is the most obvious reason behind apple’s struggle with AI race.
Apple has historically committed to only releasing things when they are really solid. Remember how long it took for cut and paste? I don’t think they will do the nice fast and break shot approach that we saw did not work well for Google…
What a dilemma for Google. "Google" the search engine product - and the brand - would have to attack itself with an Agentic search tool, because when they do that, they will cannibalize their own legacy search engine. And its revenue model. The reaction to agentic search will be very dismal if the agent compiles great answers for you and liberally intermixes them with Ad services. How will they resolve that dilemma? (Answer - they might not and the future of google might depend on something other than search...)
I’m pretty sure they have a solution ready to go that they are just waiting to release, but are doing a cost benefit analysis given the 9x higher cost to deliver results.
AI search is not that simple like you said. But organic search results will still be relevant into foreseeable future.
wait, the TSMC "production record", was that after a lot of employees quit and they were (are) having a major hr shortage? when was that comparison made? 🤔
Apple Intelligence finally arrived!
And it sucks.
Installed it yesterday hoping for decent Open Ai like voice chat with Siri and it's actually worse than the old Siri for me. it now hangs on 95% of questions I ask it, Siri just sits there with the icon showing it's lisening but nothing happens. Underwhelmed is accurate.
Did you install it using American English?
The thing is fixed cameras may not provide enough info for autonomous driving. Digital sensors have always been worse than the human eye. Driving requires focal points, dynamic exposure through adjustable aperture. If these camera were DSLR's with pivoting motors it could make sense. The most important thing in driving is looking were you are going. Its vary important in motorcycle riding because momentum keeps you up so anticipating and looking into a corner is needed to not looking everywhere and driving forward.
That being said the vehicle and computer can project physical properties like speed, steering position and anticipate position but without strong depth perception it would be stuffed knowing were the most important place to look is.
I completely get your point about not wanting AI to copy your content....
But the tricky challenge with AI is that it is not a scraping bot, but more like a person (brain) watching your video, it will not copy paste, but rather assimilate and remember key points just like humans do.
Regardless of how powerful and talented that brain is, is it fair to block it from watching what you have made public to other humans?
Don't understand why browser control is considered difficult, not why screenshots (and mouse "emulation") are used.
(chrome/firefox/edge)-devtools-(frontend)
Eg (ie) chrome-devtools-frontend
Panel extension, websockets, code injection (inject a repl), all the access to browser, the dom, events, the console, local overrides and the PC it is running on, through (all of) the browser, browser extension and devtools apis.
Now we sit and wait for Automatic 1111 to adopt Medium.
Apple may be doing something unheard of nowadays... Taking Precautions... imagine that, not absolute reckless abandon like everyone else.
Meta search needs to be free
If real time search is censored, then google will still be the best. I'll try out the web search function when I get off work.
Gigantic mega big hyper news.
I'm not using google much at all now. It's chat GPT 4.o. It can be a bit sassy and keeps ending my questions with a question of it's own. I told it that asking questions all the time at the end is not normal communication. It didn't give a damn.
re: copyright... My feeling is that if it's legal for a human to do it it should not be illegal for an AI to do it. Just because the LLM is faster and more comprehensive shouldn't make something legal, illegal.
So if it's legal for me to go to your YT channel, consume your video, and then write my own take on it in a blog, I don't see why that same activity would be illegal just because an AI does it.
I have no idea how you all can stand how bad perplexity hallucinate. Every time i have tried to use it. It made up so much s it was infuriating to work with.
Don't you not even notice that it hallucinates?
Or how can you stand it?
Notification rollups are definitely a standout feature, but Apple's AI feels like a letdown compared to the hype. The false advertising really made it seem more revolutionary than it actually is. Hopefully, future updates deliver something more substantial. Anyone else disappointed by this?
*Nice video 📷*
*Happy Diwali Matthew 🎇 🪔*
7:32 tbh i use gemini voice mode on android for a lot of web search, and it's quite amazing.
You throw shade on Apple but not R1 Rabbit. You cant make it up 😂
Why is the search engine Kagi never mentioned by anyone? I love it so much ( i am just a user and have no benefits in it)
Yes, let’s race toward every conceivable AI tool and product, turning our entire technological landscape into a Nexus system, accelerating headlong into AGI. I may not have a PhD, but I can confidently say that this path risks the very end of our species. Apple prioritizes safety over profit when it comes to AI, and there’s solid reasoning behind certain features not being integrated yet - primarily for security and safety.
We don't yet have close to the intelligence in AI required to drive a car safely on all roads.
We can do it but our cerebral cortex has about 100X the scale of the largest LLM and is several orders of magnitude more complex in its structure.
It's made up of neural networks containing around 100 neurons each (up to 700,000 synapses in each network) and it has about 300 million of these networks.
If you think the smartest LLM we currently have could achieve FSD (I don't) then all you need to do is figure out how to fit in the region of 13-25 Nvidia server racks, along with a 70-140 kw power supply into a car and you're ready to go!
Good luck with that!
AI starts clunky then beats you up if you don't use it after a few months. I really appreciate the snapshot of where it is but I hesitate to discount it yet
I had the same opinion on Apple Intelligence. I'm like, how am I actually going to benefit from this?
18.2 is supposed to bring more "Apple Intelligence". However, this was never going to be the seller that Apple hoped it would. I'd much rather keep my AI out of my OS.
Apple's intelligence might after all be to slow their older products down when they release new ones. 💡
what about lydar or lasers, but not on cars but on trafic signals and such, with data delivered to the ai
Ai Bubble is about to PoP.
Spoken like someone who doesn't know what to do with AI right now. I have the opposite problem, theres too much useful AI out there, and still much room for improvement. We are only at the start of the bubble, and while many projects will fail, many new fortunes are yet to be made. Mark my words.
😂
Either a troll, or clueless…
Great news
Suing Perplexity is baseless, as it would require suing everyone who has ever consumed their information and subsequently shared it with others.
While I am watching this, I get a notice that Claude can now run code?
"We are introducing the analysis tool, a new built-in feature for Claude ai that enables Claude to write and run JavaScript code. Claude can now process data, conduct analysis, and produce real-time insights.
Think of the analysis tool as a built-in code sandbox, where Claude can do complex math, analyze data, and iterate on different ideas before sharing an answer. The ability to process information and run code means you get more accurate answers-building on Claude 3.5 Sonnet’s state-of-the-art coding and data skills."
You are not done working for the day, lol. Ok, lol. I see further on, you talk about that a bit.
Is it only JS? I'm surprised that python isn't included?
It's a bit ironic to expect AI to drive with cameras only but not be able to navigate the desktop from screenshots alone
15:23 We only have eyes for sensory input??
When was the last time you looked in the mirror? Humans have something like 14 senses. You know the big 5. But for human navigation, we also have equilibrioception (balance, spatial orientation), proprioception (body position and movement), nociception (pain), thermoception (heat), mechanoreception (vibration), interoception (internal bodily states), and echolocation (sound reflections, rare).
Why would they even scrape ny post? It’s real life human written hallucinations 😂
Yeah, SD 3.5 medium! Please do the tests.
Sorry, but putting OpenAI's Advanced Voice Mode instead of Siri would mean giving OpenAI access to *all* of your private data and that is an absolute no-go.
metasearch in the metaverse, it metaworks
100% agree that RUclips and other platforms should add channel metadata so that creators can choose to allow AI training to utilize their content or not.
Apple and intelligence in the same sentence.
so SD 3.5 medium is just a warmed up SDXL of same size ya?
I was looking forward upgrading my iPhone to access Apple Intelligence, but now I’m afraid it was all just make believe.
I miss Steve Jobs. He knew what Innovation meant.
"ai for the rest of us" that's what apple are going with? 😂😂Way to insult your user base. They should just say "you're too dumb to use chatGPT" 😂😂
AI for the rest of us... except for Europe
Doesn't perplexity use Google search as well under the hood?
The evolution of copywrite law will be the end of for-profit LLM business.
I’m kinda selfishly sad that MS is going the platform agnostic route, as that was one of the main selling points of the AI tools we have been building. Now I have to stop telling people to avoid MS for this reason. Hmmm
timestamp for chrome agents?
Yes, not impressive for those of us accustomed to a dedicated ai. But i think apple intelligence will gradually find its place … snd, for instance, there will b convenience from not having to go off to a different app for basic ai functionality
10:45 If the information is out there, "FAIR USE" starts to take hold. If someone is simply reporting that you made a video with certain information, it is no longer copied, it is a derivative. It doesn't matter if it's used in AI or a News blogger.
Same with art. If it learns to "paint" from looking at a Bob Ross painting, it's no different than my 5-year-old doing the same thing.
NOW..... If it simply regenerates exact replica's of art or content, there is an issue. But this isn't happening.
Repeating others, but we don't just use our eyes when we drive.
the meme about companies is fun but misses another reality.
it's no use to burn cash with 10 people searching everywhere in the wrong place, it's more efficient to have 1 person digging at the right spot so that the 10 others will all focus on their specialized task when they are required :)
16:59 Has Google not learned anything from Microsofts Recall's sh*itstorm? Who in their right mind would allow Google to continuously take screenshots of their desktop, upload them into the cloud and give an AI permission to make unsupervised purchases with their credit card?
..didn't Microsoft have a project called JARVIS? When will these companies learn to be original?
I paid good money for an iPhone 15 just for Apple Intel
So far
Extremely unimpressed
All I want is Advanced Voice as Siri
All I want is Advanced Voice as Siri
All I want is Advanced Voice as Siri
hm.. on the one hand you say cars should just drive by vision like us, but then you say Chromes AI shouldn't act just by vision like us but read the code ... Your car argument is perfectly applyable here too ;P Reading the webside's code is good for now, but outdated for tomorrow
if microsoft with his Bing search is not capable of competing with google search I do not think that FB will
When my brain stores a represntation of a watched video in my brain, that is not copyright infringement. When I duplicate your work close enough to infringe your copyright you have legal recourse for that. Its exactly the same for AI. If someone financially harms you, by say, creating a competing channel with identcal derivative content, you already have full recourse under the present set of laws. I really dont see the problem here. No new laws are required. Just use the system already present to protect you.
Dont vote by mail. Early vote in person.
what's so special about the Claude update? it's not running the code server side, it's just another client side "artifact", right? It generates javascript but running it in the client machine (browser)..
Nothing really new here, it's still limited to ReactJS or plain javascript/html, no other frameworks or libraries etc., still limited in context size (the csv that you "upload" just to be pushed back in your browser for the javascript it generates).
I think langsmith has better traceable