as an experienced java developer for a decade, the java sucks at compute heavy jobs, specially which have too much recursion, it'll block the GC & you really don't have any control over memory allocation and dealloc, you may likely see random JVM crashes because of OOM, for others C++ is overkill.
I doubt this guy ever set fot in the google buiding - let alone got hired there. If THIS is representative of their level of "expertise" then they are FAR BEHIND the rest for the programming world.
If Java devs face an issue writing in a C++ code base imagine Python devs(who only did Python their whole life), they be like “Now I see why hell appears before God does ”
Bro don't use this kind of image as thumbnail. It makes bad impression.........(Persoal opinion)........ People those who know you, will must watch your videos. I like your teaching method and following you for a long time.
Trust me, no one hates these thumbnails more than I do. I would rather not put my face in them either. But they work. Don't hate the player, hate the game. 🎮 😢
I've been into C++ for a long while, so I follow game developers and C++ experts and compiler implementors and C++ standards committee people on Twitter A running joke among them is that if you feel like you know C++, you don't know enough C++, and after many years of experience you know enough about C++ to understand you don't know enough C++ I also joked about not even standards committee people not knowing all of the language, and an actual standards committee person replied to me saying they actually don't know all of the language
i saw couple things about c++ on ytb (a video about c++ new stdlib releases, templates, a video showing some standards, compiler reflection, smart pointers, )and more stuff (btw i barely coded in c++) and thought to myself(barely know c++, coded a bit in py, java and go) hmm ill give it a year and learn most of tthe language(it sounds complete whatever that means) well now i know better to not do that)
That was real for me. First eager to learn the power of C++, second feeling confident and third realizing the language is a minefield and go back to Rust where the compiler holds your hand like a child you are.
@@NotherPleb Admirable honesty from a Rust enthusiast (Rust users are called enthusiasts). Me, I'm a badass so I only program in C. And by badass I mean that my code is bad and smells like ass. But what are you going to do when you were born an uncompromising bonehead.
@@isodoubIethe means that C++ gives you tools to reduce footgubs by a pretty large amount. However, when you fuck them up, they make really hard problems to debug. It's not really about ub, any language that needs performance requires ub (rust included...). For example, instead of manually handling memory, you can use contructor/destructor pairs to allocate and deallocate memory for an object, making it less likely that you get memory leaks. However, if your class is movable and you fuck up your move constructor, your error will be harder to spot that if you used C.
@@vercolit Yes, I know that, but I still disagree -- the complete lack of structure in a C program will usually make it harder to debug than a C++ program that does the same thing. You'll still need to "move" things in C; the same semantics will be there if you want the program to behave comparably. The main difference is that C++ makes it _possible_ to make programs that would be too complex to write in C. Finding errors in such programs will be hard, but it's not the language's fault.
Just to clarify, there are of course more reasons why Google can't keep up with other companies. Btw I know I've made some negative videos about Google, but that's just because the negative stuff is more interesting to talk about. I would say my experience at Google was 90% positive, but I think there are enough videos out there talking about the WLB, free food, etc.
I think there is a video on youtube about C++ style guidelines at google , so I can understand why you feel that way! As I am a java guy but I am currently learning oops in C++ . I do find the differences . Like there are some concepts like operator overloading , default parameters which are not in Java (and Java has a reason for not having them). But I still love java ,cause it was my 1st coding language, so I am kind of biased towards it.
The problem with C++ at Google isn't any different from other companies in essence, only in scale, namely for every 10 developers there is at best one person with adequate expertise. Just like other companies Google tries to rectify it with guidelines and bureaucracy instead of hiring real experts and letting them run free.
Then you shouldn't be working in C++. That's the problem at Google as well as other large companies, they employ a lot of people who don't have adequate expertise in C++ instead of hiring a much smaller number of those who have. I've been interviewing a lot of people for C++ positions, and US candidates were horrible, less than 1 in 10 were qualified despite their resumes showing they were working at various large companies on important projects. All the best candidates came primarily from Eastern Europe -- they love C++ and know language really well. The best team I ever hired was from Ukraine, four people who did the work of a hundred of average developers, and they wrote much better code at that.
It’s the other way around for me. I program in Python and use C++ at leetcode, because C++ is much more explicit and easier to understand. Python is the most obscure language designed for small scripts. A large Python codebase is a nightmare to support.
Personally I find a large C++ codebase more readable than a large python codebase, my exp is from working in aerospace where C++ and Python are the primary languages for everything
@@lashlarue7924 because you cannot trace where certain variables and functions come from due to dynamic typing, because some errors, like a missing parameter, will surface only at runtime, because python developers like to write a messy unreadable code. In most companies C++ code conventions explicitly prohibit using obscure constructs and require the developer to write clear code which is easy to read. It looks like python developers are competing with each other to create the least readable code.
Maybe for a large company as google it makes sense and they already have services written in different lang. But for new startup js on backend completely makes sense
If you intend on having a strict style guide for any programming language, enforced by code review, then you should have a linter that runs locally and automatically when you build and it should be double checked by an auto-build attached to the review itself. That way devs don't waste time locally, unless they're pushing stuff just to be casually and quickly seen.
I'm sorry this comment isn't directly related to the video but man I love these newer videos of you on camera. Your original NeetCode videos helped me a TON when I was learning DS&A, but hearing you talk about larger topics like this and putting a face to the voice is just too cool. Many of your talks like this have sparked curiosity around a topic and then I have to go on a deep dive to learn something new. Thank you for sharing so much!
@@phillipanselmo8540 torrents ofc. about 50gibs of them. or you can check some their open source projects they spawned like clickhouse(not sure if it's ain't c) or userver
@@isodoubIet I wonder which one. Coz I grasped some Fuchsia code (utilities mainly), google tests and some others and they looked terrible on average. What actual gems are there from google?
I was hiring people for C++ positions in our company. The situation in US is terrible, people state they know C++, they showed resume working for large companies, but hardly one in ten candidates was qualified. I also had a pleasure of interviewing people from Ukraine (that was before the war), and they knew the language amazingly well, something like three out of four were hired.
Some lang rules from the experience 1 learn lang at least 25 years old. 90% of coding today is done with the 30+ y.o. languages. 2 if you want to create a new lang you will probably fail, like so many newer langs (python being the exception for now). The world doesn't need a better lang but a better programmer 3 all (old) langs have pitfalls, but generally, all have a purpose Personally.. i do JS, love C, admire C++. The life is too short for C++
Most new languages are created by people who don't know really well the existing ones (D-language would be an exception). They are attracted by one particular idea and create the whole language around it. Then they find out that the world is lot more complex and either they start years of evolution to get the holes covered during which the language becomes less and less clean, or they decide to remain a niche perhaps supported by some religious following.
"The world doesn't need a better lang but a better programmer" is an incredibly stupid sentiment, if that was the case we would all be coding in Assembly and Fortran
Joke is there are handful number of people who actually knows C++. On the serious note the reason why C++ is so complicated are array of features it provides and when you mix them ur creativity is the only limit. It has multiple class Inheritance(which most modern lang stay away from it) and mind twisting template constructs which produces countless combinations.
Redpill: Code the most immediate low level features with C/C++ (possibly using intrinsics and multithreading) and create Lua interfaces for them and glue it all together that way. I personally find it not too bad writing short modules in C++, as long as you stay away from most of the object oriented features. Binding to Elixir can be pretty fun because you can run the processes from wherever you want pretty easily.
the thing is that C++ is also suitable for those high level cases. You can use C++ in a safe way where you don’t have to manage all those things if you are not concerned about performance. Just use RAII and smart pointers for reference and you’re good to go
I can see why Google doesn't want every microservice in the same solution be written in a different language. Sure, protobufs and all, but still - maintenance burden of 10 languages vs 1 or 2 is going to take a toll. Having said that, unless it's a mature product and has a large legacy codebase, there is no reason to choose C++ over, well, (almost) anything.
I'm encountering a similar issue at my workplace. C++ code can indeed become quite intricate, especially with meta-programming involved. It can be quite challenging to navigate through its complexities 😅😅
As a C developer that frequently uses hash tables, I find this kind of funny. The standard library has no hash table implementation, but it doesn't need one because several dozen implementations already exist. Granted, they're all different and the standard committee is definitely never going to agree on how to implement such a thing with so many competing ideas, but there's nothing stopping anyone from just picking the one they like and using it. I've been using my own library for about two decades now, and if you've been at it for any length of time you should have one too. However, that said, I would fully expect anyone who's new to programming to not want to go through the effort and they'd be better off learning a programming language that does it for them.
@@samuraijosh1595 I have to find some space somewhere that I can upload it first. I refuse to use GH, but I may sign up with GL, though only because setting up a publicly visible server anonymously is next to impossible.
If Google was using a Microsoft language "Typescript", why they're just use "C#" to replaced Java and C++. C# exists to fixed both Java and C++ mistakes. I feel like Java should have been more like C#
Because by the time C# became good enough (.Net Core and even earlier than that, the whole ecosystem) there was an enormous amount of code written in Java that matured earlier So why write code in a language that not as many devs in the team know, when you can just use Java
"C# exists to fixed both Java and C++ mistakes. " Actually no, it's literally just to fix Java's mistakes. C# in fact didn't even learn from C++'s successes (see for example IDisposable and try... finally)
@@isodoubIet You know Java existed to fixed C++ problems but Java created more problems from itself. Microsoft solution was, welp let just combined both C++ and Java into one language and let what we got 😏 . Bro, that's like saying React existed to fixed Angular problems. Angular existed to fix JS problems. Vue existed to fixed React problems. Microsoft: "let bring Typescript into the table"
My C++ snake game is still the smoothest, most high performing, resilient and satisfying piece of code I’ve ever written, and C++ is the deepest rabbit hole of a language I’ve ever dug (JavaScript is slowly catching up though).
0:12 Javascript nonsense on the backend. I used to think that too but of late I have become more accepting ...in limited cases. It has its place such as for simple sites that need to be brought up qickly and where a 'heavy' language such as Java is an overkill. But it's not a good idea to build large complex/enterprise apps with javascript backend - for a host of reasons.
I can't tell you how relevant this rant is right now. I was pulling my hair out deciphering a backend service (recently!) written in C++, just to figure out that it wasn't doing anything more than simple CRUD functions 😢
lot of newer programmers are surprised to hear some things are ran rarely, and don't understand how anything but speed could be a factor. different languages have different strengths and uses
@@nempk1817genuinely yeah. Its no Go or JS for stupidly simple syntax but its legitimately simpler syntax and semanticswise than java/c# and definitely moreso than c++. It’s somewhere between c# and c for language complexity. People only call it hard to use bc they cant be bothered to fix their bad programs
@@nempk1817The rust build system (cargo) is infinitely better than c++’s mess of different tools. You don’t have to learn scripting languages like CMake in order to get your stuff to compile or install dependencies.
kinda knew it'd be the case but a bit disheartened to hear that even google doesn't use golang for their stuff, been learning golang for about a month and I really like the language but feels like a waste of time if no one is using it :( might as well invest my time into learning Rust instead.. sigh
Learning C++ at school vs learning C++ on the job are very different. The level of skill you need to do your homework assignment vs getting a project production ready are very different. If all the experience you have is school, you’re basically inexperienced 🤷♀️
I love C++ as well, but holy shit there are so many frameworks that have all these macros and other elements that it makes it feel like each one is its own language.
Someday google will understand, that it's required to hire people familiar with language they will write. Someday... But now they write c++ with 'senior' developers, which not know how to fix simple error
Not really a rant on C++ itself but more about a project using C++ while it should better use a different language. As a language, I agree C++ is a mess and hard to learn but I also think it's not going away anytime soon and there are always cases for using C++ even with the existence of new languages like Rust.
@Bebtelovimab go inherited the := syntax, and the varname before vartype from pascal. In C you define the variable type before its name. And in go its the opposite(like in pascal)
C is basically on life support (C17 only fixed defects in C11. Though C23 will add a few useful features). C++ is a living language that gets a bunch of features every three years. Bit hard to keep up at times. Sofar every new C++ version has been a significant improvement for me. Though with the right libraries C++17 isn't too bad.
@@philipbotha6718 a good language is a stable language. You don’t want new features all the time - although some features in C++ I do really like and are a great improvement. But that’s why people in the embedded world stick with C, because it’s a simple enough language to prove and test your systems is doing exactly as designed without having to dig deep in compiler specifics and side effects. Which is crucial for embedded critical systems. C ain’t going anywhere in the critical systems world.
@@Tigregalis i believe it will become the preferred 'new systems level programming language'. It still has long ways to go when compared to rust, but for what it is right now, after only 8 years of development, its great. My for fun language/hobby is C and C++ for embedded, zig to me just feels right and intuitive. Rust doesn't feel like that for me (100% could be a skill issue)
@@JoaquinDev I'm not so sure about that. Zig isn't a safe language. By the time Zig is "ready" no one will want to use it for most applications (and we're assuming Rust will stagnate). Mojo honestly has a better chance.
@@Tigregalis it doesn't have to be a safe language to overtake Rust. You have to trade performance for safety. Rust's error messages are horrible when using complex types or lifetimes, and the learning curve is steeper than Zig's could ever be, and it takes a long time to write and push to prod a program in Rust. Zig on the other hand, faster compile times, super easy to use, the tooling a building system are amazing, interoperability with C, no hidden control flows, and last but not least, probably the best debugging experience out of all low level languages. And zig still has bounds that can be defined by the dev for 'safety'. Memory safety is a skill issue.
So I've used C++ for going on 30 years now. I don't really understand why people say it's hard. I've not found it to be any more difficult than say other languages like python or rust. C++ has a ton of "features" that you don't necessarily need to use for most things.
You only said that after 30 years, no one would spend at least 5 years learning how to write production-grade C++ just to add some features to legacy code (which competitors are already advancing in) unless they have no friends
People are coming from high order languages like python, JS or Java where you have just int and suddenly they meet int, int32, int32_t, uint32_t, size_t and something like " typedef signed char int8_t;". I used to believe that IDE and compiler can auto suggest or select required type of int because at the end I am specifying to which platform I like to build code, but C++ still has very poor support in that area. But you can see it only if you have good knowledge of other modern languages.
1:18, what a hell?! It even got ranges! WTF are you saying?! 1:31, this is everything. With that, any tool can be made, thus any problem can be solved in a convenient way. 6:00, despite C is the best part of C++, it's still kind dangerous alone. I write everything in C++, in fast pace, but I prefer to leave C in the past.
I think C++ is one of the most horrible languages I have ever used (and I have to use it A LOT). Why: Because of all the reasons you mention. What I really don't understand: With what you explained, how are you able to LIKE C++??
C++ is my language at home. Its horrible, I love it. I don't really like C. I understand why people like it. The simplicity. C++ affords me all the power C has, but also gives me more abstraction to work with. Java is fine. Pretty well organized and readable. I can see how Java people are able to think broadly. Its does conduct to this. I think maybe people are immediatists? Is productivity typing? With C++ I spend more time thinking than typing. With Java more time typing than thinking. Time to accomplish something: about the same. Java code reads like a well written contract. C++ reads like an obscure datasheet. That's one for Java. I wonder if it's worth learning JavaScript.
Bro lives in a Swedish prison cell
Lol funnily enough, it's similar to my Swedish student apartment. Except the prison cells might be a bit larger and better.
Lol
I'd actually live in a Swedish prison cell if it was that uncluttered
OK😂😂😂
hes just minmaxing bro
as an experienced java developer for a decade, the java sucks at compute heavy jobs, specially which have too much recursion, it'll block the GC & you really don't have any control over memory allocation and dealloc, you may likely see random JVM crashes because of OOM, for others C++ is overkill.
How can anyone enjoy JavaScript when there is C++?!
I doubt this guy ever set fot in the google buiding - let alone got hired there. If THIS is representative of their level of "expertise" then they are FAR BEHIND the rest for the programming world.
You had to say all that instead of making a coherent argument.. nice
Were you happy working 9 to 5?
If Java devs face an issue writing in a C++ code base imagine Python devs(who only did Python their whole life), they be like “Now I see why hell appears before God does ”
javascript is garbage.
Bro don't use this kind of image as thumbnail. It makes bad impression.........(Persoal opinion)........ People those who know you, will must watch your videos. I like your teaching method and following you for a long time.
Trust me, no one hates these thumbnails more than I do. I would rather not put my face in them either.
But they work. Don't hate the player, hate the game. 🎮 😢
I've been into C++ for a long while, so I follow game developers and C++ experts and compiler implementors and C++ standards committee people on Twitter
A running joke among them is that if you feel like you know C++, you don't know enough C++, and after many years of experience you know enough about C++ to understand you don't know enough C++
I also joked about not even standards committee people not knowing all of the language, and an actual standards committee person replied to me saying they actually don't know all of the language
i saw couple things about c++ on ytb (a video about c++ new stdlib releases, templates, a video showing some standards, compiler reflection, smart pointers, )and more stuff (btw i barely coded in c++) and thought to myself(barely know c++, coded a bit in py, java and go) hmm ill give it a year and learn most of tthe language(it sounds complete whatever that means) well now i know better to not do that)
“the more I learn the more I realise how much I don’t know” Einstein
That was real for me. First eager to learn the power of C++, second feeling confident and third realizing the language is a minefield and go back to Rust where the compiler holds your hand like a child you are.
@@NotherPleb Admirable honesty from a Rust enthusiast (Rust users are called enthusiasts). Me, I'm a badass so I only program in C. And by badass I mean that my code is bad and smells like ass. But what are you going to do when you were born an uncompromising bonehead.
@@Anriuko i swear every yt interaction today included some schizo behaviour. Still laughed. (My meds didn't make these comments go away 😩)
C does have a hashmap. It's called an array and it's using integers as keys.
🤣
Yeah in-fact it's a template specialized hashmap which is even cooler.
too bad the keys cant be modified hehe
That's certainly *a* way of looking at it. I'll stick to my implementation which allows me to use strings as keys.
It's actually a pretty good exercise to implement a basic hashmap in C. Would recommend
"C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off" :-Bjarne Stroustrup
Do I know you?
Dissed his own product soo hard LMAO
The funny thing is it's not even true. UB is UB and it's no more serious in C++ than in C.
@@isodoubIethe means that C++ gives you tools to reduce footgubs by a pretty large amount. However, when you fuck them up, they make really hard problems to debug. It's not really about ub, any language that needs performance requires ub (rust included...).
For example, instead of manually handling memory, you can use contructor/destructor pairs to allocate and deallocate memory for an object, making it less likely that you get memory leaks. However, if your class is movable and you fuck up your move constructor, your error will be harder to spot that if you used C.
@@vercolit Yes, I know that, but I still disagree -- the complete lack of structure in a C program will usually make it harder to debug than a C++ program that does the same thing. You'll still need to "move" things in C; the same semantics will be there if you want the program to behave comparably. The main difference is that C++ makes it _possible_ to make programs that would be too complex to write in C. Finding errors in such programs will be hard, but it's not the language's fault.
Just to clarify, there are of course more reasons why Google can't keep up with other companies.
Btw I know I've made some negative videos about Google, but that's just because the negative stuff is more interesting to talk about. I would say my experience at Google was 90% positive, but I think there are enough videos out there talking about the WLB, free food, etc.
I think there is a video on youtube about C++ style guidelines at google , so I can understand why you feel that way! As I am a java guy but I am currently learning oops in C++ . I do find the differences . Like there are some concepts like operator overloading , default parameters which are not in Java (and Java has a reason for not having them). But I still love java ,cause it was my 1st coding language, so I am kind of biased towards it.
@@satyamjha68oh boy operators overloading and such is barely the tip of the Titanic-killing iceberg
The problem with C++ at Google isn't any different from other companies in essence, only in scale, namely for every 10 developers there is at best one person with adequate expertise. Just like other companies Google tries to rectify it with guidelines and bureaucracy instead of hiring real experts and letting them run free.
I work in Chromium code base and yes C++ still gives me headache even after more than 15 years of experience.
Then you shouldn't be working in C++. That's the problem at Google as well as other large companies, they employ a lot of people who don't have adequate expertise in C++ instead of hiring a much smaller number of those who have. I've been interviewing a lot of people for C++ positions, and US candidates were horrible, less than 1 in 10 were qualified despite their resumes showing they were working at various large companies on important projects. All the best candidates came primarily from Eastern Europe -- they love C++ and know language really well. The best team I ever hired was from Ukraine, four people who did the work of a hundred of average developers, and they wrote much better code at that.
I work as a C++ developer at a smaller company, and I like doing my leetcode problems in Python because the simple syntax is a breath of fresh air lol
lol, im a python dev and i do leetcode in c++ because its nice to see run times under 400ms
@@penislicker9093 the grass is always greener i guess
Aaah, shut up! 😁
writing C++ is like writing code with anger issues ...
template constexpr auto get_my_pp_bitmask() noexcept -> uintptr_t ...
It’s the other way around for me. I program in Python and use C++ at leetcode, because C++ is much more explicit and easier to understand. Python is the most obscure language designed for small scripts. A large Python codebase is a nightmare to support.
Personally I find a large C++ codebase more readable than a large python codebase, my exp is from working in aerospace where C++ and Python are the primary languages for everything
Explanation highly desired.
Python in any large project becomes messy. Particularly without types
Legend
Lmao, very funny.
@@lashlarue7924 because you cannot trace where certain variables and functions come from due to dynamic typing, because some errors, like a missing parameter, will surface only at runtime, because python developers like to write a messy unreadable code. In most companies C++ code conventions explicitly prohibit using obscure constructs and require the developer to write clear code which is easy to read. It looks like python developers are competing with each other to create the least readable code.
C doesn't have a hash map because you were too lazy to take a few hours and write one yourself.
javascript-on-a-backend-nonsense -- 👌
I do in js...🐐
@@GelloMello-j9z please stop!
the sooner nodejs gets deprecated into oblivion and TypeScript become's a first class citzen, the better it's gonna get.
Maybe for a large company as google it makes sense and they already have services written in different lang.
But for new startup js on backend completely makes sense
people finally start seeing the truth
server-side JS was a mistake
Still I like C++ more than Java lol
If you intend on having a strict style guide for any programming language, enforced by code review, then you should have a linter that runs locally and automatically when you build and it should be double checked by an auto-build attached to the review itself. That way devs don't waste time locally, unless they're pushing stuff just to be casually and quickly seen.
literally clang tidy
no offence but i think these videos only satiate junior engineers. would have been cool if you were a senior and talked about some deeper topics
real eyes realize real lies
I'm sorry this comment isn't directly related to the video but man I love these newer videos of you on camera. Your original NeetCode videos helped me a TON when I was learning DS&A, but hearing you talk about larger topics like this and putting a face to the voice is just too cool. Many of your talks like this have sparked curiosity around a topic and then I have to go on a deep dive to learn something new. Thank you for sharing so much!
Me, a google dev who does cpp daily, who got scared shitless by the number of things that cannot be done easily in java.
1. Printing to console.
Google should learn how to write decent C++ code, coz on average it looked awful, compared to yandex leaked code .
yandex leaked code? where?
@@phillipanselmo8540 torrents ofc. about 50gibs of them. or you can check some their open source projects they spawned like clickhouse(not sure if it's ain't c) or userver
Yeah apart from a few pockets like absl the quality of google C++ code is consistently awful. Chromium specifically is a disgrace.
@@isodoubIet I wonder which one. Coz I grasped some Fuchsia code (utilities mainly), google tests and some others and they looked terrible on average. What actual gems are there from google?
I was hiring people for C++ positions in our company. The situation in US is terrible, people state they know C++, they showed resume working for large companies, but hardly one in ten candidates was qualified. I also had a pleasure of interviewing people from Ukraine (that was before the war), and they knew the language amazingly well, something like three out of four were hired.
Sometimes I had problems reading the GCC errors, I tried to use Clang. Much much better to read and understand what's going on.
Some lang rules from the experience
1 learn lang at least 25 years old. 90% of coding today is done with the 30+ y.o. languages.
2 if you want to create a new lang you will probably fail, like so many newer langs (python being the exception for now). The world doesn't need a better lang but a better programmer
3 all (old) langs have pitfalls, but generally, all have a purpose
Personally.. i do JS, love C, admire C++. The life is too short for C++
Python is older than Java btw
Most new languages are created by people who don't know really well the existing ones (D-language would be an exception). They are attracted by one particular idea and create the whole language around it. Then they find out that the world is lot more complex and either they start years of evolution to get the holes covered during which the language becomes less and less clean, or they decide to remain a niche perhaps supported by some religious following.
"The world doesn't need a better lang but a better programmer" is an incredibly stupid sentiment, if that was the case we would all be coding in Assembly and Fortran
Sounds like teaching people Java is the problem. I despise that language.
Java irreparably wrecks programmers brains, never hire former Java developers for C++ positions.
Joke is there are handful number of people who actually knows C++.
On the serious note the reason why C++ is so complicated are array of features it provides and when you mix them ur creativity is the only limit.
It has multiple class Inheritance(which most modern lang stay away from it) and mind twisting template constructs which produces countless combinations.
as someone who regulary isocpp content, i find c++ code more readable and flexible than any languages I tried
C# is one language that's very cozy and relatively performant.
Redpill: Code the most immediate low level features with C/C++ (possibly using intrinsics and multithreading) and create Lua interfaces for them and glue it all together that way. I personally find it not too bad writing short modules in C++, as long as you stay away from most of the object oriented features. Binding to Elixir can be pretty fun because you can run the processes from wherever you want pretty easily.
the thing is that C++ is also suitable for those high level cases. You can use C++ in a safe way where you don’t have to manage all those things if you are not concerned about performance. Just use RAII and smart pointers for reference and you’re good to go
I can see why Google doesn't want every microservice in the same solution be written in a different language. Sure, protobufs and all, but still - maintenance burden of 10 languages vs 1 or 2 is going to take a toll. Having said that, unless it's a mature product and has a large legacy codebase, there is no reason to choose C++ over, well, (almost) anything.
c++ is super portable
if they like a feature they can reuse it everywhere
You're right, C++ is an extremely performant language, but development time and maintenance often outweigh any major benefit in many cases.
It just requires more discipline.
incompetent developers can write bad code in any language
I'm encountering a similar issue at my workplace. C++ code can indeed become quite intricate, especially with meta-programming involved. It can be quite challenging to navigate through its complexities 😅😅
C++ ❤❤💯✊🏻✊🏻✊🏻🫶👨💻👩💻🧑💻
As a C developer that frequently uses hash tables, I find this kind of funny. The standard library has no hash table implementation, but it doesn't need one because several dozen implementations already exist. Granted, they're all different and the standard committee is definitely never going to agree on how to implement such a thing with so many competing ideas, but there's nothing stopping anyone from just picking the one they like and using it. I've been using my own library for about two decades now, and if you've been at it for any length of time you should have one too. However, that said, I would fully expect anyone who's new to programming to not want to go through the effort and they'd be better off learning a programming language that does it for them.
can you share your C hashtable library
@@samuraijosh1595 I have to find some space somewhere that I can upload it first. I refuse to use GH, but I may sign up with GL, though only because setting up a publicly visible server anonymously is next to impossible.
You don't master c++, you get slightly less shitty at it!
Bro has beef with C++
They're trying to fix this with Carbon.
these insights are so informative
Why not use go vs java, you mentioned it was easy to read even if you never used it, and it's performant.
Yeah either would be fine with me. I just felt Java was the more natural comparison because everyone knows it.
That backpack is what Amazon gave you when you used to work there ?
If Google was using a Microsoft language "Typescript", why they're just use "C#" to replaced Java and C++. C# exists to fixed both Java and C++ mistakes. I feel like Java should have been more like C#
dot net is horrible
Because by the time C# became good enough (.Net Core and even earlier than that, the whole ecosystem) there was an enormous amount of code written in Java that matured earlier
So why write code in a language that not as many devs in the team know, when you can just use Java
Garbage collection is not for everyone.
"C# exists to fixed both Java and C++ mistakes. "
Actually no, it's literally just to fix Java's mistakes. C# in fact didn't even learn from C++'s successes (see for example IDisposable and try... finally)
@@isodoubIet You know Java existed to fixed C++ problems but Java created more problems from itself.
Microsoft solution was, welp let just combined both C++ and Java into one language and let what we got 😏 .
Bro, that's like saying React existed to fixed Angular problems. Angular existed to fix JS problems. Vue existed to fixed React problems. Microsoft: "let bring Typescript into the table"
Skill issues...
Which version of c++ did you use?
A google mention a day, keeps irrelevance away
skill issue
Yeah... median smart developer can learn Java in about a week. While the same person needs something like 10 years to really learn C++... :)
There's Rust but ... he's like C++'s super anal OCD brother who never stops complaining
Key: "Ing at Google -- racial agreggate!" Ah ha - he be -- Charlie Sheen - Netherlands , Duch?
During my 15 years as a developer, by far, C++ is the hardest language I ever worked!
I was interning at google, C++ code was just unreadable for me
skill issues
literrally your content could have just be "I doesn't have a hashmap 💀" *mic drop*
Go was made so they can use it for server stuff instead of C++ ..
My C++ snake game is still the smoothest, most high performing, resilient and satisfying piece of code I’ve ever written, and C++ is the deepest rabbit hole of a language I’ve ever dug (JavaScript is slowly catching up though).
yea bro i love having 900 FPS in my animated, colored, sound effected Pong Game lmfao
i love c++ so much
0:12 Javascript nonsense on the backend. I used to think that too but of late I have become more accepting ...in limited cases. It has its place such as for simple sites that need to be brought up qickly and where a 'heavy' language such as Java is an overkill. But it's not a good idea to build large complex/enterprise apps with javascript backend - for a host of reasons.
For ex, Spring Webflux has all the advantages of node and all the advantages of Java but little of the disadvantages.
bro neither c/c++ are memory safe. sincerely, joe biden.
Finally Joe Biden says something that makes sense
JavaScript on the backend nonsense 🥴
I can't tell you how relevant this rant is right now. I was pulling my hair out deciphering a backend service (recently!) written in C++, just to figure out that it wasn't doing anything more than simple CRUD functions 😢
lot of newer programmers are surprised to hear some things are ran rarely, and don't understand how anything but speed could be a factor. different languages have different strengths and uses
Hence, Rust
surely rust is more easy to use than c++
@@nempk1817genuinely yeah. Its no Go or JS for stupidly simple syntax but its legitimately simpler syntax and semanticswise than java/c# and definitely moreso than c++. It’s somewhere between c# and c for language complexity. People only call it hard to use bc they cant be bothered to fix their bad programs
@@nempk1817Unironically it is easier to use. But some aspects of it are certainly painful. But it's mostly for the the library authors.
@@VivekYadav-ds8oz Can you say an example where Rust is more easier to use than C or C++?
@@nempk1817The rust build system (cargo) is infinitely better than c++’s mess of different tools. You don’t have to learn scripting languages like CMake in order to get your stuff to compile or install dependencies.
Was he a full stack engineer at google?
Hi Neet. is the microservice b** sc*****ing? I have used the Java version of it and its great. Havent used the C++ version
Yeah, I def liked the Java version better
Neetcode, can you do a video on backend vs full stack vs frontend? Seems like full stack is the new norm.
if neetcode is dumb im a brick
Firs to like
kinda knew it'd be the case but a bit disheartened to hear that even google doesn't use golang for their stuff, been learning golang for about a month and I really like the language but feels like a waste of time if no one is using it :( might as well invest my time into learning Rust instead.. sigh
There are lots of companies using Go. And Google does use it, just not for everything.
JavaScript nonsense.
Correct.
broh that's why we need rust :)
C++ at Google is great.
sounds like a skill issue
Room tour please
RUST
c++ haters rise up
"The culture at google is write things in C++ even though they don't need to be." Can confirm having worked there fore 4 years.
a better question why would they need to be written in any other language?
@@USGrant21st I didn't ask a question.
@@jony7779 I wasn't talking to you.
I like the ending😂
Learning C++ at school vs learning C++ on the job are very different. The level of skill you need to do your homework assignment vs getting a project production ready are very different. If all the experience you have is school, you’re basically inexperienced 🤷♀️
Yeah part of why C++ is difficult imo, the same learning curve isnt really there with java.
Thanks
6:13 that smile gets me Every time 😂😂❤❤❤❤❤
I love C++ as well, but holy shit there are so many frameworks that have all these macros and other elements that it makes it feel like each one is its own language.
What about python? Without frameworks this language wouldnt even exist😂
I hope I never have to learn google’s c++
Someday google will understand, that it's required to hire people familiar with language they will write. Someday...
But now they write c++ with 'senior' developers, which not know how to fix simple error
Not really a rant on C++ itself but more about a project using C++ while it should better use a different language. As a language, I agree C++ is a mess and hard to learn but I also think it's not going away anytime soon and there are always cases for using C++ even with the existence of new languages like Rust.
RUST RUST RUST!!!
I love C++
Have u coded one?
At least C++ is not a good language to dabble in. You are probably not even getting the performance, only the headaches.
OLYMP -- OFICH OV -- LIBERAL -- YEAH HOUS - YOU! GOOGLE - G= gothic!
That Goth -- looked right - down that - Shot Gun!
That’s why we all use Rust now. Easy
Go feels like that perfect language. It's such a simple language, yet so powerful and performant. Not to mention the build times.
There's a few fundamental design errors in Go that I take issue with. The type system is one of the worst I've ever seen, for example.
@@lucass8119 only huge problem I have with the type system is no enums. But I can manage.
It would be perfect if it didn't have the pascal like syntax
@Bebtelovimab go inherited the := syntax, and the varname before vartype from pascal.
In C you define the variable type before its name. And in go its the opposite(like in pascal)
@@MI08SKI don't like the looks of Go syntax (I have never used it though), but differentiating between assigning value and initialization is great
C++ and c are the two languages I love but I still learn new things in C++.
C is basically on life support (C17 only fixed defects in C11. Though C23 will add a few useful features). C++ is a living language that gets a bunch of features every three years. Bit hard to keep up at times. Sofar every new C++ version has been a significant improvement for me. Though with the right libraries C++17 isn't too bad.
@@philipbotha6718 a good language is a stable language. You don’t want new features all the time - although some features in C++ I do really like and are a great improvement. But that’s why people in the embedded world stick with C, because it’s a simple enough language to prove and test your systems is doing exactly as designed without having to dig deep in compiler specifics and side effects.
Which is crucial for embedded critical systems. C ain’t going anywhere in the critical systems world.
I love these videos.
C++ stands for Chad!
That's C, C++ is Cuck
it doesnt even have a hashmap 💀
is this bait? Is std::unordered_map technically not a hashmap or something?
I said C does not have a hashmap.
@@itsbk6192Technically, you need to clean your ears.😅
the elephant in the room - what are your thoughts on Rust?
rust is good, crazy learning curve. I believe Zig will surpass it at least for systems level stuff in a couple years.
@@JoaquinDev Surpass it in what sense?
@@Tigregalis i believe it will become the preferred 'new systems level programming language'. It still has long ways to go when compared to rust, but for what it is right now, after only 8 years of development, its great. My for fun language/hobby is C and C++ for embedded, zig to me just feels right and intuitive. Rust doesn't feel like that for me (100% could be a skill issue)
@@JoaquinDev I'm not so sure about that. Zig isn't a safe language. By the time Zig is "ready" no one will want to use it for most applications (and we're assuming Rust will stagnate). Mojo honestly has a better chance.
@@Tigregalis it doesn't have to be a safe language to overtake Rust. You have to trade performance for safety. Rust's error messages are horrible when using complex types or lifetimes, and the learning curve is steeper than Zig's could ever be, and it takes a long time to write and push to prod a program in Rust.
Zig on the other hand, faster compile times, super easy to use, the tooling a building system are amazing, interoperability with C, no hidden control flows, and last but not least, probably the best debugging experience out of all low level languages. And zig still has bounds that can be defined by the dev for 'safety'.
Memory safety is a skill issue.
Thanks for making this video. This is really inspiring for us who aspire to C++ and Big Tech
So I've used C++ for going on 30 years now. I don't really understand why people say it's hard. I've not found it to be any more difficult than say other languages like python or rust. C++ has a ton of "features" that you don't necessarily need to use for most things.
You only said that after 30 years, no one would spend at least 5 years learning how to write production-grade C++ just to add some features to legacy code (which competitors are already advancing in) unless they have no friends
People are coming from high order languages like python, JS or Java where you have just int and suddenly they meet int, int32, int32_t, uint32_t, size_t and something like " typedef signed char int8_t;". I used to believe that IDE and compiler can auto suggest or select required type of int because at the end I am specifying to which platform I like to build code, but C++ still has very poor support in that area. But you can see it only if you have good knowledge of other modern languages.
Rust when?
1:18, what a hell?! It even got ranges! WTF are you saying?! 1:31, this is everything. With that, any tool can be made, thus any problem can be solved in a convenient way.
6:00, despite C is the best part of C++, it's still kind dangerous alone. I write everything in C++, in fast pace, but I prefer to leave C in the past.
I think C++ is one of the most horrible languages I have ever used (and I have to use it A LOT).
Why: Because of all the reasons you mention.
What I really don't understand: With what you explained, how are you able to LIKE C++??
C++ is my language at home. Its horrible, I love it.
I don't really like C. I understand why people like it. The simplicity.
C++ affords me all the power C has, but also gives me more abstraction to work with.
Java is fine. Pretty well organized and readable. I can see how Java people are able to think broadly. Its does conduct to this.
I think maybe people are immediatists? Is productivity typing? With C++ I spend more time thinking than typing. With Java more time typing than thinking. Time to accomplish something: about the same. Java code reads like a well written contract. C++ reads like an obscure datasheet. That's one for Java.
I wonder if it's worth learning JavaScript.