Thank you for this video. I am interested in natural law like every human being should be. We are being duped by nihilism and the social sciences. I am grateful for those men and women who do seek objective truth and virtue because the world is a better place because of it.
Something I’ve been struggling with for a while, looking at my peers. In contrast to the sentiments of earlier generations, they are being brought up to reject *any* concept of objective truth going so far as to deny notions of cause and effect. It seems that those who recognize a divine will seem to have a much firmer grasp on reality.
Okay, i would appreciate clarity, natural law= common law would only be as some state otherwise which is rather confusing, what may not even be common. to state of where time and dimension is- what is natural to be may not be example of birth and yet the whole being or existentialism - existence may not, or simply to where the need to destruct? where the whole idea of good and evil is and before one could be or what is determined pre determined? On account to my need and understanding- we provided we are determined ( adamant) but what is considered as principle or law- in act ( to those one part as some say of faith -believers) God, Angels, Man( prophets) Book- well the judgment of good and evil( value and virtue) now, we are giving a another to state by- of End of day - when earth stood still mode of silence of transition as opposed to end of the world- in my term= Qiama' what is stated as what humans may be and may not be but was done by and imposed by was case of my scenario and which i have tried to reach out countlessly but none cared but eager and in playing- cruelty. a good 20 years( 49 years or what is accounted to lineage a min. 500 years) if that is not eternal- as good as life sentence how does one- and in all works and doing among the group class caste society- even where the one part continent- country? Posting this while my head and mind are still and chances many would take and erase or completely as done by the "female-shemale"- Tue- 17122024- 937am internal is the whole....
just to add one majority of the whole many. educated and arrogant belongs to the Bill Gates team feel and thinks that all can be edited, and simply cut or the works- media when every creation is and belongs to- during all games created and play- that has impacted mostly of what is natural born and pushed to the side or confused with the "doll"- most of the whole many between technology or...can't quite get the term right... in case scenario what is and what belongs to and would take endless or- the whole "counter offer like"
Man as law or God as law. When man springs forth light, magnetism, duality, consciousness, form, et al, with vibration/word then I'll be worried about what man thinks of the origins of natural law. The academic "expert" is a prime mover in the trans-humanist movement, and a replay of the same old historic precedent. Some desperately wish to supplant the primordial forces in hopes of becoming God's them selves, without recognizing their origins, who could ever reach such a state of mind? The world economic forum and it's "thinkers" invade and pervert at all levels of western society. A warm, impotent society is one in decay, not unlike the normal life cycle of all things in this place. A perfect mechanism for rebirth and regeneration, dust to dust, ashes to ashes.
but its the chicken before the egg thing; one can with reason, judge a "natural" law to be reasonably good . I mean we dont have specific Gods, say Odin or the Purple Spaghetti Monster making laws that are not in agreement with most reasonable people.
![Can Natural Law Change When Human Nature Is Constant? [No. 86]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QGaye5033xE/mqdefault.jpg)
![Can Natural Law Change When Human Nature Is Constant? [No. 86]](/img/tr.png)
Thank you for this video. I am interested in natural law like every human being should be. We are being duped by nihilism and the social sciences. I am grateful for those men and women who do seek objective truth and virtue because the world is a better place because of it.
Something I’ve been struggling with for a while, looking at my peers. In contrast to the sentiments of earlier generations, they are being brought up to reject *any* concept of objective truth going so far as to deny notions of cause and effect.
It seems that those who recognize a divine will seem to have a much firmer grasp on reality.
How do you get a firmer grasp on reality by believing things that can't be verified in reality?
Ultimately? Yes.
Okay, i would appreciate clarity, natural law= common law would only be as some state otherwise which is rather confusing, what may not even be common. to state of where time and dimension is- what is natural to be may not be example of birth and yet the whole being or existentialism - existence may not, or simply to where the need to destruct? where the whole idea of good and evil is and before one could be or what is determined pre determined? On account to my need and understanding- we provided we are determined ( adamant) but what is considered as principle or law- in act ( to those one part as some say of faith -believers) God, Angels, Man( prophets) Book- well the judgment of good and evil( value and virtue) now, we are giving a another to state by- of End of day - when earth stood still mode of silence of transition as opposed to end of the world- in my term= Qiama' what is stated as what humans may be and may not be but was done by and imposed by was case of my scenario and which i have tried to reach out countlessly but none cared but eager and in playing- cruelty. a good 20 years( 49 years or what is accounted to lineage a min. 500 years) if that is not eternal- as good as life sentence how does one- and in all works and doing among the group class caste society- even where the one part continent- country? Posting this while my head and mind are still and chances many would take and erase or completely as done by the "female-shemale"- Tue- 17122024- 937am internal is the whole....
just to add one majority of the whole many. educated and arrogant belongs to the Bill Gates team feel and thinks that all can be edited, and simply cut or the works- media when every creation is and belongs to- during all games created and play- that has impacted mostly of what is natural born and pushed to the side or confused with the "doll"- most of the whole many between technology or...can't quite get the term right... in case scenario what is and what belongs to and would take endless or- the whole "counter offer like"
Man as law or God as law.
When man springs forth light, magnetism, duality, consciousness, form, et al, with vibration/word then I'll be worried about what man thinks of the origins of natural law.
The academic "expert" is a prime mover in the trans-humanist movement, and a replay of the same old historic precedent. Some desperately wish to supplant the primordial forces in hopes of becoming God's them selves, without recognizing their origins, who could ever reach such a state of mind?
The world economic forum and it's "thinkers" invade and pervert at all levels of western society. A warm, impotent society is one in decay, not unlike the normal life cycle of all things in this place. A perfect mechanism for rebirth and regeneration, dust to dust, ashes to ashes.
True.
@@robertortiz-wilson1588 You mean "I believe."
@@someonenotnoone Maybe if I was just a Protestant.
@@robertortiz-wilson1588 argument, protest, potato, potato
Natural law is the common law.
Right, like common sense, which told people the earth was flat and the center of the universe.
Reasoning without verification. Elaborate guessing.
Natural law or natural rights do not at all require belief on the existence of a supernatural. Infact, its perfectly opposite to the same.
I'm not convinced. Natural law and natural rights are people trying to present their feelings as facts.
but its the chicken before the egg thing; one can with reason, judge a "natural" law to be reasonably good . I mean we dont have specific Gods, say Odin or the Purple Spaghetti Monster making laws that are not in agreement with most reasonable people.