That is how the Byzantines saw other realms that they considered empires. I think a title prestige level should be implemented to show the ranking of how prestigious a title is.
@@Apollo1989VThat seems like inevitably splitting hairs. Is a Caesar derived title a kingdom or an emperor? What about petty kingdoms? What about titles that became prestigious specifically because of a recent example (president for an example from modern history)? It's all splitting hairs, so I see no issue in abstracting it down to the five title ranks (baron>count>duke>king>emperor).
Cant wait for Crusades to get reworked, integrating with the Landless Adventurer mechanic. Imagine the People's Crusade acts as a giant landless bunch of adventurers going around trying to crusade..
Agree. But after Crusades are better balanced I really want to experience naval warfare. They shot down naval warfare coming with Roads to Power but didn't shoot it down completely. Maybe it will be a thing when playable republics get announced in the future? I can only hope.
Seems to be even more fun to be the coruler I wonder how common that will be. Maybe with Choose your destiny you take over as your grandkid on death and be put in as coruler
This reminds me of Kang Xi emperor of the Qing dynasty. The man lived to the age of 68 and reigned for 61 years. When his son, Yong Zheng emperor, ascended to the throne, he was 44 years old and reigned for 12 years and 275 days before he passed.😂
@@jefferyhanderson7849 the more recent is queen Elizabeth. Woman reigned for 70 years and her son Charles ascended at his seventies and recently diagnosed for cancer.
So we are going to have legendary figures, renowned for their battlefield prowess as our "rulers", but our ruler can never participate in a battle as a knight. Can you please let El Cid actually fight on the frontlines as a knight, if we desire it? Make it a toggle if you believe players would rage too much from losing their rulers, but I rage far more if my super high prowess heir is promoted to ruler and he no longer racks up an immense killcount each battle, and I believe not having some of the most legendary knights be able to fight would be even worse.
@@ElAri1917 not as a knight afaik, he will only get injured but never deal actual army kills himself. So as a Commander your prowess stat is basically wasted.
@@jupiter4509 hoping they add naval mechanics and warfare in a future republic dlc, since it would be fundamental to make them really stand out from other governments
Would be very cool, but historically (and for balance purposes) maybe combat ships would be extremely expensive but still useful you could blockade a trade route to your war target. I think they should add some mechanics from Imperator like piracy so that you could also have another incentive of having some combat ships, and historically it was detrimental since they could sometimes take over a city/castle and make raiding worse (See Fraxinetum).
With admin and landless, republics are 100% being worked on, and we may get it in the next few years (im not as opmistic enough to say next year), more so, the 1187 bookmark is the PERFECT date to introduce them. I cant imagine republics and trade routes without naval rework
I have a requested regarding the men-at arms. Given the famed combined arms nature of the Byzantine army, it seems a pity to not have a dedicated archer unit (Toxotai or Mourtatoi). Also considering the earlier start date, it would be good to have a pre Varangian guard unit, either the Exkoubitoi or the Hikanatoi. In any case, this looks amazing… I cannot wait to give Byzantium a whirl soon!
You seem like the kind of person worth asking for recommendations of books worth reading regarding the Eastern Roman war machine. So, any recommendations?
Amazing! Congratulations to the dev team for making another expansion that is amazing! chefs kiss*. Also to many more other upcoming excellent expansions.
What I miss tremendosly is building monuments, visible legacy of your age. remember that dlc in ck2, it came rather late. I forgot the name. I want to be able to build custom too, like in Imperator Rome. perhaps that entire holding is one type of wonder tower, mauseoleum, palace rather than just Castle/Temple/City. they could still have perks of these three, but be customized too. and even have levels, up to something incredible majestic like Haghia Sophia or Notre Dame
That co-king feudal stuff is such a good compromise for keeping the balance of partition, but allowing us to still have good heirs. Especially as having your heir crowned before your death did actually happen sometimes.
Can we get a,, stepping down from the throne" decision, after a certain age, or if otherwise deemed unworthy, the character might choose to step down from the throne in order for his heir to take over, upon which, you can either continue playing that character in his,, retirement", or playing as his heir, as at the moment, the only way of getting to play the heir while the current ruler is still alive is getting landing the heir, switching, and overthrowing/assassinating;getting yourself deposed(which isnt that good since you loose an authority level), or commiting suicide, which isnt good because you loose a level of house splendor
currently, if you want to switch, just do tyranny and surrender to a civil war. also, if your character is over 60, you can create a faith with endura (and aniconism), convert to it, kill the character, (destroy a few artifacts) and convert back.
being able to step down would be too powerful of a game mechanic, as every time your heir is better than your current king, you'd just depose yourself. it's also a little unrealistic, kings very rarely stepped down of their own volition.
@@doghat1619 nah, your heir usually is not better bc the longer you are playing a character, the better it gets, and the longer you are not playing the heir by switching, the weaker it gets. besides, in the mid game, most your dynasty members should have all the max leveled congenital traits so there aint "better"
@@Lutasiren No. The moment a genius kid gets good education he is almost immediately more important as a ruler than his more experienced parent ruler, unless idk you're running a very complex scheme or are relying on other lifestyle perks for a war or trying to start a religion/empire. If he becomes ruler, he will progress the lifestyle trees much faster, will spend more time with all of those bonuses, and due to him being a genius and his father not, his kids will get a much better education in all fields as well, so you can start getting family member dukes/kings asap.
@@ProbusVerus This is the mod I was thinking about most, sure AGOT will benefit as well, but I wouldn't be surprised if Fallen Eagle was created in wait for this DLC
It'd be cool if beeing a ruler of the non dominant sex automatically makes your spouse a co-ruler you can't get rid of without fighting a civil war (kind of like Queen Urraca of León's situation)
could you guys please change the voice-over? or maybe the post-processing of the audo causes trouble? it's still the same af the last few videos, it sounds like AI. it sounds strange sometimes. but maybe I'm the only one that is bothered?
We're implementing two types of landless play in Roads to Power: Landless Administrators, and Landless Adventurers. Wandering Nobles is an event pack intended to add more variety to travel events.
Looks amazing, but i think there needs to be some sort of proclaim emperor faction or scheme for powerful generals & governors to represent the sheer number of attempted coups there were
Looking forward to the new features for sure especially landless gameplay. CK3 has been my favorite game for the past four years. That being said I hope the economy gets reworked at some point or perhaps for CK4. I know economy is more of a Vicky3 focal point but it would add so much to the game if you could hash out trade agreements, build on natural resources, and even marry into families that have access to resources (like nobles did in real life). Plus it would add more reason to go down the diplomacy life style and more reason to actually go to war instead of land and power. Regardless its a great game that i really enjoy. Keep the content coming!
Loving the co-emperor mechanics. Really hoping one day you split the 867 start date in 2. Start one in January with Michael still alive and Basil as his co-emperor with the new mechanics. Maybe have some special event where they try to kill each other. One where Michael wins or the historical path with Basil winning. Would also be nice to have a later 867 start date with Aella and Michael already dead.
Co-Emperors solved more problems than they created, otherwise it wouldn't have happened. It greatly mollified the problem of a vacant throne on the death of the Emperor, which is actually what invited civil wars more than anything.
Can the feudal co-ruler have land attached? It would be amazing if they could for example become the dauphin and get that duchy... or in england... give Wales to the heir apparent
In the dev diary the co-ruler has a duchy and they talk about a scheme to get a kingdom. So, I assume if you wanted to replicate this, you would just give your Heir Wales and make the Diarch.
Why are ballistae in thematic armies as a field weapon? Ballistae we’re not used as field weapons in the empire past the 600s or so. Also themes should gives most of their taxes to the emperor, minus a salary, while keeping all levies as a support to the thematic men at arms
Eastern Roman Empire is just one of the options under that rule; we included a couple alternatives for people who are *really* serious about their immersion.
@@rafaelbastos8713 if youre on this video and play CK3, youre a nerd like the rest of us so who you tryna call a nerd? pot calling the kettle black that is 😂
I always disliked the idea that the varangian guard existed and we get notifications about some Norse guy joining it, but we can't use them anyway, not even those guys as knights. Thank you.
I bet Admin government is gonna be used with the free cities in AGOT and maybe the Aversarians in Godherja. I could see it be used for Republic mods too. The new co ruler system would be good with Co-Consuls
@@sews1523 the guy that narrates these videos is a real person and works for Paradox as a community manager, he made several videos before, obviously not AI
@@Miguel09MC it's possible that they trained a model using his voice from all the previous vids. or else maybe they were just glitches from the editing software or something, but they sounded like typical artifacts
I want the popular opinion on this , I think religion in CK3 are good but lack of something and specifically the head of a religion who like the pope is more a piggy bank . And most importantly be the head of a faith doesn’t change the way you will play.
What about Byzantine neighbour Georgia? You got everything wrong! Please fix it in the next updates someday. I am from Georgia and it saddens me to see the wrong things.
@@balticpagan1495 in 1066, not a correct ruler, also in new time period, that they are adding the queen is not queen, but a countess, as I saw in trailer. However, it was golden age at tharlt time for us and we were huge kingdom, like an emipire.
@@ewadfe3705 it was though, it was established by a roman emperor, it's capital was nicknamed New Rome, both west romans and even people outside the empire referred to the "byzantines" as romans, and it maintained many roman cultural traditions. The term byzantine is a modern invention and it has always been the true successor to the Roman empire.
I mean, their government is the most unique compared to the rest of the game factions and understandably they would be fucked no matter how delayed the game would be. Ck2 had worse problems and one of them is well, Byzantium not really functioning close to Byzantium evennwith dlc.
@@o-o-o9450 exactly they were ROME and whenever I hear one of my greek countrymen call the empire Byzantium I am simply disgusted I hate the term Byzantium
@@wisereaper4747 im greatly worried that they will focus on only politics for this byzantine expansion like most paradox byzantine updates go, when the military should hold much importance as well (as so they promised) .i can also say that the men at arms do not seem to portray any sort of byzantine military identity, which was a massive part of their culture, government and politics. truth be told i really just hope that they do what other devs have failed to do and make them possibly unique and adaptive like they where in the middle ages (even thought they were in a downward spiral). maybe they could even try and do the same with others like the arabs,french,russians, or africans.
All Emperors are equal, but some are more equal than others
That is how the Byzantines saw other realms that they considered empires. I think a title prestige level should be implemented to show the ranking of how prestigious a title is.
@@Apollo1989V I guess thats what legitimacy is also trying to represent?
@@HansWurst1569 no, that is a person’s worthiness as a ruler.
@@Apollo1989VThat seems like inevitably splitting hairs. Is a Caesar derived title a kingdom or an emperor? What about petty kingdoms? What about titles that became prestigious specifically because of a recent example (president for an example from modern history)? It's all splitting hairs, so I see no issue in abstracting it down to the five title ranks (baron>count>duke>king>emperor).
Dragons in the AGOT mod, landless rulers here, good times for CK3 players.
Cant wait for Crusades to get reworked, integrating with the Landless Adventurer mechanic. Imagine the People's Crusade acts as a giant landless bunch of adventurers going around trying to crusade..
can imagine a just character trying to tell all the deceitful or greedy members of the party to not burn down the wrong city every 2 stops
More than a holy war it was a war of pillaging and rape. The crusaders were nothing but barbarians
Maybe it could be just tens of thousand levies of mercenaries named People's Crusade crusading all over the place
I’m sure there will be mods for that at some point.
Agree. But after Crusades are better balanced I really want to experience naval warfare. They shot down naval warfare coming with Roads to Power but didn't shoot it down completely. Maybe it will be a thing when playable republics get announced in the future? I can only hope.
As someone who thinks daily about Rome this is what I have been waiting for in a while!
i think about rome every waking minute
I edge to Roman lore every night
Based
@@NeakMeakk
Kindred spirit
The roman empire can eat my shit.
hope there's varangian guard mechanics and events
Having Co-Rulers will be such a cool feature
their already is vizier for muslims/they can be greatest thing ever or the worst
Seems to be even more fun to be the coruler I wonder how common that will be. Maybe with Choose your destiny you take over as your grandkid on death and be put in as coruler
Yeah, honestly I thought that this is what diarchies were supposed to be. I was confused.
15:30 - "just die already" 💀
What if your heir is also a cannibal?
"Hurry up and die already, I'm hungry!"
This reminds me of Kang Xi emperor of the Qing dynasty. The man lived to the age of 68 and reigned for 61 years.
When his son, Yong Zheng emperor, ascended to the throne, he was 44 years old and reigned for 12 years and 275 days before he passed.😂
@@jefferyhanderson7849 the more recent is queen Elizabeth. Woman reigned for 70 years and her son Charles ascended at his seventies and recently diagnosed for cancer.
I quite like their decision to have Ballista units serve as powerful archer units who also do siege progress
So we are going to have legendary figures, renowned for their battlefield prowess as our "rulers", but our ruler can never participate in a battle as a knight.
Can you please let El Cid actually fight on the frontlines as a knight, if we desire it?
Make it a toggle if you believe players would rage too much from losing their rulers, but I rage far more if my super high prowess heir is promoted to ruler and he no longer racks up an immense killcount each battle, and I believe not having some of the most legendary knights be able to fight would be even worse.
I mean if you put your ruler as the commander of the army he will fight or am i remembering that wrong?
@@ElAri1917 not as a knight afaik, he will only get injured but never deal actual army kills himself. So as a Commander your prowess stat is basically wasted.
@@Cookiestab Damn that sucks
vote this up
a mix of the current system with ck2's one would be great
"We are not adding naval warfare to CK3 with ROADS TO POWER" So it is possible that we may get naval warfare later?👀 Please🙏
@@jupiter4509 hoping they add naval mechanics and warfare in a future republic dlc, since it would be fundamental to make them really stand out from other governments
Would be very cool, but historically (and for balance purposes) maybe combat ships would be extremely expensive but still useful you could blockade a trade route to your war target.
I think they should add some mechanics from Imperator like piracy so that you could also have another incentive of having some combat ships, and historically it was detrimental since they could sometimes take over a city/castle and make raiding worse (See Fraxinetum).
With admin and landless, republics are 100% being worked on, and we may get it in the next few years (im not as opmistic enough to say next year), more so, the 1187 bookmark is the PERFECT date to introduce them. I cant imagine republics and trade routes without naval rework
13:05 Thats wrong, co-emperorship was only pure formality an was usually given to the emperors son to secre his accession
CK3 expansion should be called the "Betzantine". Gambling should spread as a plague mechanic from Constantinople. Such an actual medieval game!
I have a requested regarding the men-at arms. Given the famed combined arms nature of the Byzantine army, it seems a pity to not have a dedicated archer unit (Toxotai or Mourtatoi). Also considering the earlier start date, it would be good to have a pre Varangian guard unit, either the Exkoubitoi or the Hikanatoi. In any case, this looks amazing… I cannot wait to give Byzantium a whirl soon!
I quite like their decision to have Ballista units serve as powerful archer units who also do siege progress
You seem like the kind of person worth asking for recommendations of books worth reading regarding the Eastern Roman war machine. So, any recommendations?
@@Velesus101 read the byzantine republic
@@Velesus101
"Sowing the Dragon's Teeth: Byzantine Warfare in the Tenth Century"
""The development of the Komnenian Army 1081-1180"
@@tylerellis9097 Thanks!
22:40 Nice feudal doesn't have to fight confederate partition for the whole game anymore ❤🎉
Amazing! Congratulations to the dev team for making another expansion that is amazing! chefs kiss*. Also to many more other upcoming excellent expansions.
What I miss tremendosly is building monuments, visible legacy of your age. remember that dlc in ck2, it came rather late. I forgot the name. I want to be able to build custom too, like in Imperator Rome. perhaps that entire holding is one type of wonder tower, mauseoleum, palace rather than just Castle/Temple/City. they could still have perks of these three, but be customized too. and even have levels, up to something incredible majestic like Haghia Sophia or Notre Dame
yesss thissss
Gloss function is very appreciated. Good job on that one 👌😁
MAN THIS DLC IS EASILY THE BEST IN CK3'S HISTORY!
i love your profile pic
@@C0NSTANTINUS and I love yours as well 😂😂
Profile pictures check out
That co-king feudal stuff is such a good compromise for keeping the balance of partition, but allowing us to still have good heirs. Especially as having your heir crowned before your death did actually happen sometimes.
Not gonnal lie, looks awesome. Also this DLC with unlanded characters is a clear path to knightly orders and republical merchant families.
Add command vassals men at arms, best way to make use of the vassals
Can we get a,, stepping down from the throne" decision, after a certain age, or if otherwise deemed unworthy, the character might choose to step down from the throne in order for his heir to take over, upon which, you can either continue playing that character in his,, retirement", or playing as his heir, as at the moment, the only way of getting to play the heir while the current ruler is still alive is getting landing the heir, switching, and overthrowing/assassinating;getting yourself deposed(which isnt that good since you loose an authority level), or commiting suicide, which isnt good because you loose a level of house splendor
Yeah, an ability to abdicate would be quite nice.
currently, if you want to switch, just do tyranny and surrender to a civil war. also, if your character is over 60, you can create a faith with endura (and aniconism), convert to it, kill the character, (destroy a few artifacts) and convert back.
being able to step down would be too powerful of a game mechanic, as every time your heir is better than your current king, you'd just depose yourself. it's also a little unrealistic, kings very rarely stepped down of their own volition.
@@doghat1619 nah, your heir usually is not better bc the longer you are playing a character, the better it gets, and the longer you are not playing the heir by switching, the weaker it gets.
besides, in the mid game, most your dynasty members should have all the max leveled congenital traits so there aint "better"
@@Lutasiren No. The moment a genius kid gets good education he is almost immediately more important as a ruler than his more experienced parent ruler, unless idk you're running a very complex scheme or are relying on other lifestyle perks for a war or trying to start a religion/empire. If he becomes ruler, he will progress the lifestyle trees much faster, will spend more time with all of those bonuses, and due to him being a genius and his father not, his kids will get a much better education in all fields as well, so you can start getting family member dukes/kings asap.
I can already see how some of my favourite mods will use these features! 😍
I can see how AGOT may use the Duumvirate as the Hand of the King or the Prince of Dragonstone.
@@jacobscott2473 I think this dlc will be essential for my favorite mod Fallen Eagle.
@@xess4168
Duumvirate for hand, Admin government for a (distant) future Yi Ti? Maybe for Slavers Bay? Actually, slavers bay makes a lot of sense…
@@ProbusVerus This is the mod I was thinking about most, sure AGOT will benefit as well, but I wouldn't be surprised if Fallen Eagle was created in wait for this DLC
I'll keep waiting for the English/Britannia flavor to be added to the game
"Just die already" XD
It'd be cool if beeing a ruler of the non dominant sex automatically makes your spouse a co-ruler you can't get rid of without fighting a civil war (kind of like Queen Urraca of León's situation)
this looks phenomenal, so much new content and improvements. cant wait to promote a series of coups and civil wars in Byzantium
Would Basileía Rōmaíon be one of the names? Imo that's my favorite one to use
That's one of the options under the Byzantium name game rule, yes
@@CrusaderKings 📈
We need a new Dev Diary right now about the new schemes! 😁
About time we got all this. Still crucial gane mechanics needed like papal investiture and antipopes, etc.
could you guys please change the voice-over? or maybe the post-processing of the audo causes trouble? it's still the same af the last few videos, it sounds like AI.
it sounds strange sometimes. but maybe I'm the only one that is bothered?
Why are there voices in my head during the video
is the landless content going to be in a different DLC from roads to power? if not
what is the point of landless nobles
We're implementing two types of landless play in Roads to Power: Landless Administrators, and Landless Adventurers.
Wandering Nobles is an event pack intended to add more variety to travel events.
@@CrusaderKings Thanks for the explanation
Theres some weird audio problems in this vid
True, like 2 voices in one
@@1992zorro It gets even worse as the video goes on
Looks amazing, but i think there needs to be some sort of proclaim emperor faction or scheme for powerful generals & governors to represent the sheer number of attempted coups there were
This looks amazing
Looking forward to the new features for sure especially landless gameplay. CK3 has been my favorite game for the past four years. That being said I hope the economy gets reworked at some point or perhaps for CK4. I know economy is more of a Vicky3 focal point but it would add so much to the game if you could hash out trade agreements, build on natural resources, and even marry into families that have access to resources (like nobles did in real life). Plus it would add more reason to go down the diplomacy life style and more reason to actually go to war instead of land and power. Regardless its a great game that i really enjoy. Keep the content coming!
Loving the co-emperor mechanics. Really hoping one day you split the 867 start date in 2. Start one in January with Michael still alive and Basil as his co-emperor with the new mechanics. Maybe have some special event where they try to kill each other. One where Michael wins or the historical path with Basil winning. Would also be nice to have a later 867 start date with Aella and Michael already dead.
Can't wait to play norse and create the biggest and bestest viking-bureaucracy.
Will you guys add a function to change the color palette of our clothes?
I would love to see farming implemented in the game in the vein that fishing is going to be added 😊
This looks really fun, finally you can have your heir become independent rather than some useless courier.
Co-Emperors solved more problems than they created, otherwise it wouldn't have happened. It greatly mollified the problem of a vacant throne on the death of the Emperor, which is actually what invited civil wars more than anything.
Finally special Norman knights
is there gonna be a way for the vassals to side with either the senior or the co-emperor during times of trouble? would be cool ngl
I like the addition of game-rule about the name of Eastern Roman Empire
naval warfare with adding another continent will be awesome or a mission tree like in eu4
Can you personally race your chariot?
Can the feudal co-ruler have land attached? It would be amazing if they could for example become the dauphin and get that duchy... or in england... give Wales to the heir apparent
In the dev diary the co-ruler has a duchy and they talk about a scheme to get a kingdom. So, I assume if you wanted to replicate this, you would just give your Heir Wales and make the Diarch.
Adding a game rule to change the name of the ERE is awesome saves me the effort of switching to them to change the name 😅
Why are ballistae in thematic armies as a field weapon? Ballistae we’re not used as field weapons in the empire past the 600s or so. Also themes should gives most of their taxes to the emperor, minus a salary, while keeping all levies as a support to the thematic men at arms
I knew we would have an option for renaming byzantium to the Eastern Roman Empire before starting a game!!!
Eastern Roman Empire is just one of the options under that rule; we included a couple alternatives for people who are *really* serious about their immersion.
@@CrusaderKings A.K.A Nerds
@@CrusaderKingswhile this is a tiny thing to add, I apreciate it immensely
@@rafaelbastos8713 if youre on this video and play CK3, youre a nerd like the rest of us so who you tryna call a nerd? pot calling the kettle black that is 😂
Looks fire not gonna lie
Im curious how this will work in a multiplayer game.
I always disliked the idea that the varangian guard existed and we get notifications about some Norse guy joining it, but we can't use them anyway, not even those guys as knights. Thank you.
LETS GO!
i'm not sadist but will you add death sounds? like ck2
Do these cultural traiditons work for the roman empire title as well?
Will there be Warhammer 40k levels of civil wars in Byzantine?
Co-Rulers sounds cool to me.
Will we get coronations?
preordered
WOO we can change Byzantine namee
Would the Latin Roman culture be affected in this dlc?
Is Chad going to be an Emperor of the byzantine empire?
W DLC
so would my co ruler son kids be born in the purple if hes co emperor?
Bi-ZAN-tee-um… right?
it's an AI voice - it does a bunch of weird pronunciations throughout 😂😂
I played MTW 2 a lot, the German leader pronounces it similarly sometimes.
What is a byzantine?
12:41 The person making the video should really listen to it first before posting the audio errors
N A V Y U P D A T E P L E A S E
Will we have these mechanics converted to mods?
I bet Admin government is gonna be used with the free cities in AGOT and maybe the Aversarians in Godherja. I could see it be used for Republic mods too. The new co ruler system would be good with Co-Consuls
Yet more modifiers, added bonus: forced intrigue playstyle... That's a nope for me.
Vini, vidi, vici.
Had to close the video from the way he was pronouncing Byzantium
We need naval warfare.
Am I the only one who thinks this guy sounds AI generated lol
please add toxotai 🙏
the ai voice you're using for the narrator is good
weak bait
@@Miguel09MC not kidding. there were at least 3 glitches that gave it away. it is extremely convincing though
@@sews1523 the guy that narrates these videos is a real person and works for Paradox as a community manager, he made several videos before, obviously not AI
@@Miguel09MC it's possible that they trained a model using his voice from all the previous vids. or else maybe they were just glitches from the editing software or something, but they sounded like typical artifacts
@@sews1523 yeah i agree they sound weird but knowing the person behind the voice i just attribute them to software issues or a bad microphone
Erm what the sigma ????
Ai voice going crazy
I hope one of the options is to simply call the Byzantine Empire, the Greek Empire lol
I want the popular opinion on this , I think religion in CK3 are good but lack of something and specifically the head of a religion who like the pope is more a piggy bank . And most importantly be the head of a faith doesn’t change the way you will play.
The Woke liberals got to the byzantine empire name xD
Gonzalez Richard Thompson Lisa Rodriguez William
What about Byzantine neighbour Georgia? You got everything wrong! Please fix it in the next updates someday. I am from Georgia and it saddens me to see the wrong things.
what was wrong?
?
Bro has left the chat, it seems💀
Can’t even stick around to explain their argument…
@@balticpagan1495 in 1066, not a correct ruler, also in new time period, that they are adding the queen is not queen, but a countess, as I saw in trailer. However, it was golden age at tharlt time for us and we were huge kingdom, like an emipire.
The focus of the dlc is literally a Byzantium rework… Not Georgian.
ITS EASTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
It wasn't even close to being Roman
@@ewadfe3705hre larper detected
@@ewadfe3705 it was though, it was established by a roman emperor, it's capital was nicknamed New Rome, both west romans and even people outside the empire referred to the "byzantines" as romans, and it maintained many roman cultural traditions. The term byzantine is a modern invention and it has always been the true successor to the Roman empire.
@@ewadfe3705 the greekoids will never understand lol😂
@@ewadfe3705 It was literally the roman empire lol.
I hope “Kingdom of the Greeks” is an option for the empire’s name. Just because it would be funny.
Byzantium should never have been this barebones at release....
I mean, their government is the most unique compared to the rest of the game factions and understandably they would be fucked no matter how delayed the game would be.
Ck2 had worse problems and one of them is well, Byzantium not really functioning close to Byzantium evennwith dlc.
@@magniwalterbutnotwaltermag1479 not willing to excuse them. It’s been 4 years?
Am I first?
Looks like Paradox needs to buy more coffee, quick, buy more DLC. LoL
So many things. Like literally so many things. It's gonna be fun for the first 2 hours until the micromanagement gets border-line impossible.
Those Greeks are as Roman as the Germans were huns.
Again stop calling it byzantine
Or else what? You're gonna call the varangians?
Think they want to call it byzatum for some reason@@penzorphallos3199
BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE BYZANTINE EMPIRE
So called 'history buffs' on their way to tell others the byzantines were called Romans (it's the only thing they know about the empire)
We call it Byzantium now nerd, go back to 1453
I really hope they move on from this weird AI voice after this DLC is released, it's super distractingly monotonous and keeps glitching out!
Petition for Byzantium to start being referred as eastern Rome
Agree, they are the only true successors of Rome.
@@o-o-o9450 exactly they were ROME and whenever I hear one of my greek countrymen call the empire Byzantium I am simply disgusted I hate the term Byzantium
These types of mechanics are what makes CK3 and Stellaris superior to all other grand strategy games... it's magnificent.
Holy shit the men at arms suck
how? they're great
@@wisereaper4747 im greatly worried that they will focus on only politics for this byzantine expansion like most paradox byzantine updates go,
when the military should hold much importance as well (as so they promised) .i can also say that the men at arms do not seem to portray any sort of byzantine military identity, which was a massive part of their culture, government and politics.
truth be told i really just hope that they do what other devs have failed to do and make them possibly unique and adaptive like they where in the middle ages (even thought they were in a downward spiral). maybe they could even try and do the same with others like the arabs,french,russians, or africans.