When both Asian coalitions feel threatened by me.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 сен 2024
- This is the fifth game I made for my subscribers where I celebrated my 2000 subscribers. This game was recorded starting from January 16th.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @bmfoxcallofwar
Join my discord server:
/ discord
Background music: Odin - Evan King
• Video
once i went for MT and railguns as axis it was insane no one could stop me
South china here
3:10 - korea has a city, since he and south manchukuo were in war with me 😂
5:50 " lots of blah blah little boem boem" you wonder how WS is putting on the hat of a very good player while this was indeed not very impressive
He's probably just repeating what he observes from Ivan.
This was a really heated game, I was communist china and was caught between both the Asian Coailitions.
Yes the community games are usually very active.
Question,it's better to pick an Asian country is this map right,and also how important are battleships in this map?
Comintern is is solid too. You can win the map without using a navy. Two players in Asia, two in America and you conquer the map while the other players waste their resources on a navy.
So is it good to pick pan Asian and use your navy to form a wall surrounding Asia so that the American countries can't get in and then conquer Asia?
@@ernestjosephdelatorre5972 America is smaller and will be united faster. Surround Asia with a sub wall will be extremely expensive and it can still be penetrated easily. You'll be spread out and weak. If you use spies to reveal the enemy that sub wall isn't needed. Naval bombers are more efficient and versatile. The winning strategy still is 2 players in Asia, 2 players in America and you dominate the map without making a navy.
How can I join games like this,so I can learn better
I announce them in Discord and on my RUclips channel.
very hard decision