Mr blownhemi, nice to see that your everywhere this is a mate of mine who owned the car in the gong until he crashed it. Good to see that your picking up some great footage dude keep up the great uploads and I hope it pays off for you one day.
Actually it went 8L (488ci), then 8.3L(505ci) and 8.4L (510ci) then 8.4L(512ci) But as much as I love Mopars spanking ANY rotary would be a big call. We've got some very quick rotors here in Australia
Rotary is about bang for the buck and simplicity and in most cases rotor heads just love them. For those who dont want to spend money on valve springs, and cams, and rockers or rods. Rotary is about a third of the cost in the engine department probably in build time too. If you can win with less then why not? and who gives a shit what it sounds like if it gets down the track faster than the next guy.
@munkymania i think you're forgetting that rotaries also have apex seals to add to the complication.... if you don't know, when apex seals fail, it's the equivalent of throwing a rod.
Pistons have more mechanical advantage but rotors complete firing cycles much more quickly (6x over a four stroke), which is why they produce far more hp and torque per liter
@flinchey a fully dressed 13b-rew with the twins weights at about as much as a ls1... a single turbo conversion without all the extra stuff from the twins puts the engine down at least 50lbs...
@cskater18 yes, putting down around 375 horse at the moment. but not really just a guy with a monte carlo. a MECHANIC with a monte carlo, a mustang, a dakota, a rx7, and a grand marquis
@TheRguru1 the 13b weighs more than an LS1/2/3 V8. they're smaller, not lighter. they're not complicated to fix, it's just apex seals. the thing with the 'breakdown' is it's the seals DESTROYING the rotors.. it's like rebuilding a piston engine, except a rotary rebuild costs about 1/4 that of a piston motor. and you can get a 13b-REW (rx-7 motor) for a couple of grand, no worse than any other high performance car.
the torque is found from piston engines due to more moving arms pulling the weight, where's like you said the rotation of the rotary has fast delivery rather then torque.
@ZoDDyXXX 13B completely stripped short-block will weigh around 220lb pallet-ed. A complete long-block minus a/c, p/s, and clutch, will usually weigh 350-400 palleted depending on year and model.
1.3L actually and they have the power and speed of a 7L viper engine, rotary engine fires 3 times per rotation where a conventional engine fires once for every 2 rotations
@flinchey actually rotary engines are lighter than piston ones, not only that but they are also more stable as they dont vibrate as much, but even though their compact their thirstier than piston engines and the worst thing about them is if they break dwon, im not saying their unreliable but there's a completely different problem, if it breaks down you can just get any mechanic to fix it as their extremely complicated, instead you'll have to buy a brand new engine for atleast 15k
yes but the area in the hemisphere is still taken into account when determining the displacement. basically no difference. You can get 2000 bhp out of a 5.7l hemi, just the same as you can a 350 smallblock
@madjimms no it doesn't, learn to google it's not the light weight of the rotary that makes it favourable for handling, it's the fact that it's so compact it sits behind the front axle, drawing back the weight more, a decent modern V8 will weigh less (also take into account the lack of intercooler piping and turbos and intercooler) and be also compact enough to ALMOST be situated the same for weight distribution.
@madjimms being a 800hp N/A with cams exhaust tune and OTR is lower than a fully worked 13b turbo at 600hp that will need rebuilts constantly so it doesn't eat apex seals right? look more 500hp tops for reliability, if that. need a 20b for a reliable 800hp and even then it weighs too much... blow (force in any way really) an ls* and you'll have ridiculous acceleration power and reliability, linear powercurve up to 1000hp no worries. don't get me wrong though, i LOVE the brap brap :)
@VicTheMazdaFan1993 where did i ever say i disliked rotaries? i LOVE rotaries, one of the best sounding engines ever, and to a point they perform well too (super high revving and all).. just they're neither light weight OR high powered, or particularly reliable. they're just small, so sit further back in the engine bay.
@madjimms displacement, yes weight, no an (N/A) LSx V8 will weigh less, more power/kg... less power/litre though. not that that matter in the slightest.
hemi is like ordinary as fuck hemi=hemispherical cylinder head. That doesn't add a lot of power to the engine, it's just the fact that they all have high displacements. example: 350 smallblock vs 5.7l hemi
@Engelados Honestly I think when people drop V8's its just a waste, takes no skills to build just money & a big engine. It takes MUCH more skill to squeeze out good HP on a small motor.
@madjimms 450~lb's for a 13bREW. 415lb's for the LS3 V8 (just google it, it's the first page of results) LS1 apparently weighs under 400lb's (little more with cast iron stock headers and stuff, but what kinda noob does that now?) much less huh? and when we're going to talk power:weight ratio, the LS3 kicks the 13bREW's ass... apology time now?
Mr blownhemi, nice to see that your everywhere this is a mate of mine who owned the car in the gong until he crashed it. Good to see that your picking up some great footage dude keep up the great uploads and I hope it pays off for you one day.
Despite being a lightweight, doing that takes more torque than I thought any rotory had:-)
Damn that turbo whistle....awesome xD
THAT THING IS A POGO STICK!!!! UNBELIEVEABLE!!!
Makes me want to go to Cordova!! Cant wait! WOO HOO!
Actually it went 8L (488ci), then 8.3L(505ci) and 8.4L (510ci) then 8.4L(512ci)
But as much as I love Mopars spanking ANY rotary would be a big call. We've got some very quick rotors here in Australia
0:25 cameraman doing a wheelie as well! Insane car.
almost every piston engine that isnt a flathead is a hemi to some degree but it alters the compression of the engine and allows for better power
Rotary is about bang for the buck and simplicity and in most cases rotor heads just love them. For those who dont want to spend money on valve springs, and cams, and rockers or rods. Rotary is about a third of the cost in the engine department probably in build time too. If you can win with less then why not? and who gives a shit what it sounds like if it gets down the track faster than the next guy.
@munkymania i think you're forgetting that rotaries also have apex seals to add to the complication.... if you don't know, when apex seals fail, it's the equivalent of throwing a rod.
it has a bigger hemisphere in the head compared to most engines. chrysler has hemi trade marked because they were the first to market them
Pistons have more mechanical advantage but rotors complete firing cycles much more quickly (6x over a four stroke), which is why they produce far more hp and torque per liter
@watchforfinger Yes, efficient in fuel consumption. But when it comes to power to weight, the rotary makes way more power for its size & displacement.
wow she likes to bring the front tires up easy, nice views man
@flinchey a fully dressed 13b-rew with the twins weights at about as much as a ls1... a single turbo conversion without all the extra stuff from the twins puts the engine down at least 50lbs...
rotors are powerful as hell itself.!!!! if you have three of them
@cskater18 yes, putting down around 375 horse at the moment. but not really just a guy with a monte carlo. a MECHANIC with a monte carlo, a mustang, a dakota, a rx7, and a grand marquis
@TheRguru1 the 13b weighs more than an LS1/2/3 V8. they're smaller, not lighter.
they're not complicated to fix, it's just apex seals. the thing with the 'breakdown' is it's the seals DESTROYING the rotors.. it's like rebuilding a piston engine, except a rotary rebuild costs about 1/4 that of a piston motor.
and you can get a 13b-REW (rx-7 motor) for a couple of grand, no worse than any other high performance car.
the torque is found from piston engines due to more moving arms pulling the weight, where's like you said the rotation of the rotary has fast delivery rather then torque.
@madjimms Didnt know that but it makes sense since its working hith rotor =)
@ZoDDyXXX 13B completely stripped short-block will weigh around 220lb pallet-ed. A complete long-block minus a/c, p/s, and clutch, will usually weigh 350-400 palleted depending on year and model.
nothing better than a rotary
1.3L actually and they have the power and speed of a 7L viper engine, rotary engine fires 3 times per rotation where a conventional engine fires once for every 2 rotations
A little stiffer Right rear spring rate might help that launch a little. Body looks like it is tweaking pretty hard too.
That's sick!
@ZoDDyXXX A rotary engine is roughly a 1/3rd the weight of an I4...
@flinchey actually rotary engines are lighter than piston ones, not only that but they are also more stable as they dont vibrate as much, but even though their compact their thirstier than piston engines and the worst thing about them is if they break dwon, im not saying their unreliable but there's a completely different problem, if it breaks down you can just get any mechanic to fix it as their extremely complicated, instead you'll have to buy a brand new engine for atleast 15k
Yes!!! Awesome!
yes but the area in the hemisphere is still taken into account when determining the displacement. basically no difference.
You can get 2000 bhp out of a 5.7l hemi, just the same as you can a 350 smallblock
Vipers have 8.4L engines. Thank you very MUCH! ;)
@madjimms yeah it will trust me especially twin turbo -.-
@sjpro1 But are hemis 1.3ltrs. Don't get me wrong hemis are sick so are blownhemis :)
@vitamincracing New rotary engines don't have the same oil burning problems & are built very tough.
@madjimms no it doesn't, learn to google
it's not the light weight of the rotary that makes it favourable for handling, it's the fact that it's so compact it sits behind the front axle, drawing back the weight more, a decent modern V8 will weigh less (also take into account the lack of intercooler piping and turbos and intercooler) and be also compact enough to ALMOST be situated the same for weight distribution.
Yea, look at the new RX8s, 2 rotors @ 1.3 liters giving 250 hp and 225 ftlbs.
@wsimpson86 yeah 388 pounds with a twin turbo system on them
@madjimms being a 800hp N/A with cams exhaust tune and OTR is lower than a fully worked 13b turbo at 600hp that will need rebuilts constantly so it doesn't eat apex seals right? look more 500hp tops for reliability, if that.
need a 20b for a reliable 800hp and even then it weighs too much... blow (force in any way really) an ls* and you'll have ridiculous acceleration power and reliability, linear powercurve up to 1000hp no worries.
don't get me wrong though, i LOVE the brap brap :)
0:25 lol he points the camera up like if the car was gonna take off flying lmao
Oh Yes!
hemis are powerful as hell
@thetalkingelement still only a 2l engine
@VicTheMazdaFan1993 where did i ever say i disliked rotaries? i LOVE rotaries, one of the best sounding engines ever, and to a point they perform well too (super high revving and all).. just they're neither light weight OR high powered, or particularly reliable. they're just small, so sit further back in the engine bay.
@L00kovathere definetly 302 swapped!
@wsimpson86 So why I can hold a 13B in my hands?
im pretty sure after this run was told not to come back without wheely bars lol but then sadly crashed it not much later on
350ci is the same size as 5.7-litres
Do you think he'd run 8's if he used all four wheels?
@madjimms displacement, yes
weight, no
an (N/A) LSx V8 will weigh less, more power/kg... less power/litre though. not that that matter in the slightest.
@wsimpson86 Do some research, you will see taht a LS1 is about 400pounds, engine only, and a 13B is about 250pounds...
Holy shit. How many horse-power does it have? O.o
What a machine
once you go braap you never go back!
The camera man did a wheel stand at the same time with the damn camera he was so excited, lol.
I remember when he used to drive it on the street was loud as fuck
@07gmclover its because they dont need 5.000.000.000cc to make 300hp
1.300cc - 280bhp.....now thats some serious shit !
he was asking if a hemi is 1.3l like the rx7...
@cskater18 hahahhahahha omg, you're so funny, i almost took you seriously for a second
@OdinTheTrueGodOfWar its not all about the actual wheelie its more so the rotary pure power... no motor like it
@KidsAtWar Wankel engine have expiration date if u know what i mean ...
@madjimms NO DUH!! srry i had to say that its a 1.3
@wsimpson86 I don't like high CC engines, too much bulk not enough efficiency (although the Wankel isn't efficient as far as MPG)
I just realized how ridiculously fast the AMS GTR is. Runs faster times than this in a street-able car
Nope there WAS a 8L engine the newer ones have 8.4L engines, also a "drag" viper would spank any rotary thrown at it...
13b always.
fucking yeah
@Engelados atleast they dont sound like pissed off bumble bees
there is actually a 7.2L
who says rotaries dont have torque?
hemi is like ordinary as fuck
hemi=hemispherical cylinder head. That doesn't add a lot of power to the engine, it's just the fact that they all have high displacements. example: 350 smallblock vs 5.7l hemi
I know this, I must of been talking about something else, I know quite a lot about Rotarys
@flinchey What the hell are you on about? A 13b weighs about 388lb with all accessories on it. Try find me a LS v8 that weighs less that that
@flinchey Being an American built engine adds 100hp right? *facepalm*
@madjimms with far fewer moving parts..
@Engelados Honestly I think when people drop V8's its just a waste, takes no skills to build just money & a big engine. It takes MUCH more skill to squeeze out good HP on a small motor.
@Kawasakiforlife7 I'd love to take you up on that
@flinchey a rotary engine weighs MUCH less than any normal piston engine....
I thought two mopeds were racing.hahahah
like a rhetorical question..
@Kawasakiforlife7 All that coming from the guy with a monte carlo...
Any car has torque if you put as much money as this one has in it.
wheelie bars would get a better time out of this bad boy
lifts off the ground and still runs a 10.0
fail?
@Baios7 Rotary engine is just another name for Wankel.
He is gonna end up crashing that beauty.
That is fucking hilarious
Faaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrkkkkkkkkk!!!!!!!
@sk843v3rr Motor with WAY less liters, less HP & less weight kicking V8 ass.....
pfftt who needs a wheelie bar..
seriously thats not a wild wheelstand... look up camaro wheelie and find the 8sec video
IM LOOKING FOR A RX-7 MY SELF IN ANY ONE CLOSE TO TACOMA IS SELLIN ONE HIT ME UP PLZ
is serious cars is wheeling
@madjimms
450~lb's for a 13bREW.
415lb's for the LS3 V8
(just google it, it's the first page of results)
LS1 apparently weighs under 400lb's (little more with cast iron stock headers and stuff, but what kinda noob does that now?)
much less huh? and when we're going to talk power:weight ratio, the LS3 kicks the 13bREW's ass... apology time now?
looks a little lop sided to the right
time wasted going up could have been time going forward.... wheelie bars would be a plus
สุดยอด
Dear santa.. Xd
@cskater18 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA! i saw your ONE video. its a *CLEARLY* stock silver 2000 mustang GT convertible. slow, and a girls car
thats not normal
Lol and muscle heads thought imports couldn't wheelie...