$300.000 and worth every penny: The Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Perpetual Calendar

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024

Комментарии • 291

  • @IAmCapNFapN
    @IAmCapNFapN 2 года назад +31

    I'd sell it, buy a car, house and a Gshock

    • @dparag14
      @dparag14 2 года назад +2

      Exactly. And, crazy money for a watch.

    • @stanwilson7040
      @stanwilson7040 2 года назад +1

      @@dparag14 The watch is worth every penny but you broke dudes can barely afford a 10$ Timex so why even watch this video? This watch is for successful businessmen and CEO's

    • @cheezy7928
      @cheezy7928 2 года назад +3

      @@stanwilson7040 No need to be rude mate, you dont know their financial status.

    • @matts.6789
      @matts.6789 2 года назад +1

      @@stanwilson7040 because even the biggest watch youtubers always have content of great affordable watches alongside masterpieces... looking at 6 figures timepieces doesn't subtract the value and awe for the affordable watches we commonsfolk can buy.

    • @MrMobi007
      @MrMobi007 2 года назад

      live a little, get 2 Gshocks

  • @tomwilcox3670
    @tomwilcox3670 2 года назад +15

    Gorgeous photography and elegant dialogue as always, Jenni. A big thank you to Kurt Klaus who was commissioned by IWC in 1985 to simplify the extremely complicated watch setting you showed us here to a single pusher, so that some modern perpetual calendars including my Jaeger Grande Reveil perpetual calendar, which is also accurate to 2100, can be set without the possibility of showing day, date, month and year combinations that don't actually exist.

    • @Skibbityboo0580
      @Skibbityboo0580 2 года назад

      The dialog, and photography are classier than the watch imho

  • @Milofchg
    @Milofchg 2 года назад +51

    Some people are willing to spend that much money because it’s difficult to get at retail. NOT because of the complications or the material it’s made out of.

    • @wengjai
      @wengjai 2 года назад +2

      @Dorian Phoenix For you.... Your opinions don't matter to anyone else except you.

    • @franciscolee3890
      @franciscolee3890 2 года назад +8

      @Dorian Phoenix That's like saying $200 worth of paint and canvas for an art piece. The value comes from craftmanship, history, and design, most of all, appreciation.

    • @franciscolee3890
      @franciscolee3890 2 года назад +1

      @Dorian Phoenix You are very mistaken. Most of the components are hand finished. A single watch can take 9months to sometimes years to finish. That is why it is always low on stock, and the resale price is like 5times the retail price on certain models.

    • @DM-rc4yu
      @DM-rc4yu 2 года назад +5

      @@franciscolee3890 Do you really believe this? Years to finish? Hand finished does not mean hand made.

    • @Milofchg
      @Milofchg 2 года назад +1

      @Dorian Phoenix The Royal Oak design is a solid design. It looked futuristic/modern in 1973, and it looks ahead of it's time for 2022. I'll give AP that much credit for crating something that's classic and timeless. It's bad enough perpetual calendar movements are very delicate and easy to damage. However, AP movements (basic although highly decorated) are crap, too delicate. The framework and DNA of AP movements are JLC. The modification AP does ruins the reliability of the movement. They ought to let JLC modify the movements as well as decorate them. That way you will get your moneys worth. Service cost $1500 just to get it regulated or demagnetized. Over $2k for a full service and not just any watch maker can get AP parts. You need to take it in to a local AP AD. Any knocks or bumps you will throw off it's poor accuracy. AP is a one trick pony. They do not deserve to be part of this so called holy trinity of watch making when they put all their eggs into Royal Oaks. F**K AP! For the same money a mid level A Lange or Patek makes AP look like cheap Invicta shitters. I owned a Royal Oak before the hype and never again. Sold it, should of held on to it a few more years just to flip for a nice profit. It looks nice in a collection but too weak for casual use.

  • @KLucero22
    @KLucero22 2 года назад +73

    +/- unspecified seconds per day and 20m water resistance. If the dial said “Longines” everybody would be trashing this watch

    • @DonLee1980
      @DonLee1980 2 года назад +7

      If Longines could create their own luxury sports watch design, so iconic that everyone had to follow, and it took that much time to create each watch, I'd be the first person in line to buy it.

    • @KLucero22
      @KLucero22 2 года назад +8

      @@DonLee1980 if you dig into a bit of history you may be to surprised that Longines has already done so in the distant past. Longines as a company was already 73 years old by the time Rolex was founded

    • @KLucero22
      @KLucero22 2 года назад +6

      @@DonLee1980 also the Royal Oak has always been a dress watch in disguise as sports watch. Everybody trashes the Speedmaster for having 50m WR for example. But on a Royal Oak with 20m WR nobody bats an eye.

    • @albertodejuan6104
      @albertodejuan6104 2 года назад +1

      @@DonLee1980 .you said it yourself. If everyone were following you'd be one of them.

    • @garyboyle695
      @garyboyle695 2 года назад +1

      Where are you getting the +/- 10 seconds per day from?

  • @steelsteez6118
    @steelsteez6118 2 года назад +4

    $300 WOW! AP has a winner with this one. I'll buy 50 of them!!

  • @-Medici
    @-Medici 2 года назад +52

    Absolutely NO watch is worth 300k. Don't get me wrong, i am also into the "watch game" lol, i also pay ridiculous amounts of money for these things. But.. really.. let's face it and repeat along with me: absolutely no watch is worth 300k. We pay it because we're stupid. Because we love the technology and all.. or (don't quote me on this) for money laundering purposes. But really worth these prices they are not.

    • @EEE_MMM
      @EEE_MMM 2 года назад +4

      If you consider the development of such a complicated watch, that has to be earned back over such a small volume of watches sold-- the price is probably justified.
      Would I ever pay it? Hell no. It's worth more than my house, my car and everything else I own on this world combined.

    • @fkkggkkfdsadsa111
      @fkkggkkfdsadsa111 2 года назад +1

      Mafia black money laundering corrupt politicians arab sheikh watchs....

    • @EEE_MMM
      @EEE_MMM 2 года назад +1

      @@polygoncoco JLC arguably makes many more of them than AP does, and therefore didn't have to earn back as much per unit sold.
      That being said-- the price may be justified, but that doesn't mean the watch is worth it. I agree with everyone who says the price is exorbitant and/or ridiculous, because... Well, because it is.

    • @-Medici
      @-Medici 2 года назад +4

      Yeah i mean, don't take everything i say so serious man.. but i still think the watch market in itself is something like the art market or nfts or the likes. It's a giant excess of capitalism, decadence and idiocy. But hey, I'm totally part of it and loving it - just saying sometimes we all should need a reality check, including myself.

    • @ErikL727
      @ErikL727 2 года назад +4

      Completely agree. My 4bd/2ba home with a back yard and 2-car garage just 10 mins away from some of the best beaches in the USA...cost me less than this watch.

  • @ToolwatchBoutique
    @ToolwatchBoutique 2 года назад +7

    Your and Kai’s channels used to be good, but you’re totally drifting away from reality. You’re advertising a $300k watch calling it “worth every penny” and Kai wants to talk about changes in Rolex availability just 1 day after a war started. 👎👎👎 it’s a great pity..

  • @mikekallen5113
    @mikekallen5113 2 года назад +1

    I need this watch like right now.A true work of art..the craftsmanship and just the overall beauty is striking ...thanks for showing a Holy Grail watch. Cheers

  • @cheezybred
    @cheezybred 2 года назад +2

    Just servicing this thing probably costs more than my car.

  • @jethrojacinto2798
    @jethrojacinto2798 2 года назад +2

    It’s an okay looking watch but worth every penny out of the $300k? Definitely not. Not even worth $30k. Just all inflated by hype.

  • @AdventureCoupleUK
    @AdventureCoupleUK 2 года назад +8

    If I was going to pay that much for a watch, I'd need it to be perfect. For instance, the sloppy black paint on the Leap Year hand 5:13 is just not good enough?

    • @AwesomizedArmadillo
      @AwesomizedArmadillo 2 года назад +1

      I'm honestly shocked they allowed that bad of an application, you can even see it in the regular (non macro) shots

    • @mjf2377
      @mjf2377 2 года назад

      Unbelievable sloppy QC

  • @csigouin1
    @csigouin1 2 года назад +1

    Very cool. Jenni is lucky to be able to review it for our benefit. It's like an automotive journalist getting to test drive a Bugatti.

  • @johnnychen235
    @johnnychen235 2 года назад +2

    Thank you for the review. What a timepiece! Work of art from so many angles...

  • @dreamwalker3699
    @dreamwalker3699 Год назад

    Absolutely a gorgeous work of art.

  • @AliasHSW
    @AliasHSW 2 года назад +2

    The video title says it only $300! Sign me up!

  • @jparker1901
    @jparker1901 2 года назад +2

    I still need to understand that hexagonal screws in the hexagonal hole, they are a mechanical nonsense as they should be bolts

  • @NeuroticLobster
    @NeuroticLobster 2 года назад +5

    Worth every penny? 😂😂😂

  • @scofab
    @scofab 2 года назад +1

    For what went into the design and execution... truly a thing of beauty.
    I'd wreck it working on a tractor... not for me but truly appreciated for the quality that clearly manifests in every detail.
    Well done.

  • @GA-1st
    @GA-1st 2 года назад +28

    Superb! The craftsmanship is out of this world. Obviously, an impressive watch, but the design just is not for my taste. BTW, the close-up photography is excellent. Great video!

    • @Milofchg
      @Milofchg 2 года назад +2

      Craftsmanship yes, hype, no. Price? HELL NO. A Perpetual Chronograph from Patek is better built and more exclusive for half the price.

    • @goldsilverlight
      @goldsilverlight 2 года назад

      Nonsense. At this price mark it obviously has to be this good craftsmanship or better.

  • @bluecollarwatches7048
    @bluecollarwatches7048 2 года назад +12

    I’m sure I can get that on Ali express for about $40 😂

    • @jayhillrubis
      @jayhillrubis 2 года назад +1

      Yup, similar or better 👍

  • @sultanr932
    @sultanr932 2 года назад +6

    +-10seconds, unreliable movement 🤡🤡

  • @Milofchg
    @Milofchg 2 года назад +11

    With all due respect this watch is NOT worth $300k. If some people are willing to pay for it, then good for them. It’s their money and they are blessed to be in a position to afford it. Yes it’s a beautiful watch and the complications are a work of micro engineering. However, the aftermarket prices are dictated more by the sellers although these watches are in demand and are limited in availability. $300k is worth a 3 bedroom single family home in most middle class American suburbs. A standard Ferrari or Lamborghini cost less than this watch. It’s really vulgar to buy, price, expect, WEAR something this insignificant. $80k yes I can see that but $300k? No…. I will not entertain or congratulate anyone who subjectivity waste money on this watch…. Please stick to real obtainable watches. This is hype and does not reflect the real world most people live in.

    • @Milofchg
      @Milofchg 2 года назад

      @@polygoncoco I usually ignore but someone needs to speak out on the stupidity speculation value. Poor people, new money, suckers that lease Lamborghini cars but rent a one bedroom buy these things. True 1% or people that know class will not waste their money on high end shitters.

  • @gundamOPS
    @gundamOPS 2 года назад +2

    Am I the only one bothered by the subdials markings not perfectly centered???

  • @westonraske8152
    @westonraske8152 2 года назад +8

    I really enjoyed the great photography of the fine finishing and craftsmanship of this piece. An amazing piece of engineering and craftsmanship that you have made available to the masses. I don’t care that I will never be able to buy one or even justify spending that much money on a watch of I could afford it. But it sure is nice to be able to see it up close and marvel at it.

  • @al-knows-nothing
    @al-knows-nothing 2 года назад +1

    That’s not a small apartment: that’s a detached house in the North of England :D

  • @DM-rc4yu
    @DM-rc4yu 2 года назад +3

    Looks like an Aliexpress watch.

  • @SingleTrackMined
    @SingleTrackMined 2 года назад +7

    Good lord, Jenni, I love your videos but this watch just indicates money can't buy taste. Wearing it makes one look needy. Not for money, for attention.

    • @blink6612
      @blink6612 2 года назад +2

      Exactly this is made for People who have more money than taste.

    • @SingleTrackMined
      @SingleTrackMined 2 года назад +1

      @@ToolwatchBoutique Not mutually exclusive.

  • @jhatgotagat300
    @jhatgotagat300 2 года назад +2

    Smaller apartment?!?!?!?! That’s a whole starter home here in the us what’s going on Germany?!

  • @miraclethehousekid9339
    @miraclethehousekid9339 2 года назад +1

    I’m an AP fan and own a 15500st but I can see lots of imperfections on the dial print.

  • @AlexMi77
    @AlexMi77 2 года назад +5

    Wow 40 hours power reserve on a perpetual calendar means you really need to keep an eye on it…perpetually ☺️ I’m not sure that’s a standard or other references have longer hours? Resetting the watch is kind of clunky process each time

    • @slickvick456
      @slickvick456 2 года назад

      That’s the case with Patek as well. Even the 5711 has a power reserve of around the same time. My annual calendar lasts for around 1.5 days. Really annoying tbh.

  • @montha123
    @montha123 2 года назад +8

    No watch is worth 300 thousand

    • @TripleDDDD
      @TripleDDDD 2 года назад +1

      wait half a year and it will be 350 thousand

    • @montha123
      @montha123 2 года назад +1

      @@TripleDDDD crazy prices

  • @asn6758
    @asn6758 2 года назад +2

    I misread the title as $300.00 It’s the day I learned about the Omega x Swatch Speedmaster. For a second, I thought the past 24 hours was some weird wristwatch fever dream.

  • @stevefox8605
    @stevefox8605 2 года назад +43

    Funny how tastes differ, I wouldn't pay £30 for it ( if I had to keep it) - I really dislike GG's designs, gold & fussy dials so this ticks all the fugly boxes for me. Variety is the spice of life tho, & to each their own. Good review, Cheers Jenni 👍🏻👍🏻

    • @Mart77
      @Mart77 2 года назад +7

      True, i have same thought exactly, not my cup of tea at all

    • @Makendu
      @Makendu 2 года назад +1

      @@Mart77 you dont even have 1k in ur account

    • @Mart77
      @Mart77 2 года назад +6

      @@Makendu That's where you're wrong kiddo

    • @jayhillrubis
      @jayhillrubis 2 года назад +4

      @@Makendu even if you're a billionaire it's immoral - think about it. I admire great craftsmanship as much as anyone but with homeless hungry uneducated children in the world anyone buying this must be a psycho, actually, either that or incredibly shallow. lol
      💖🙏🌻

    • @OraneenarO
      @OraneenarO 2 года назад

      @@jayhillrubis with that said, I wanna be a psycho one day

  • @mrc7966
    @mrc7966 2 года назад +10

    Leaves me completely cold. Even if it was $3000 I could think of several watches I'd prefer.

    • @jayhillrubis
      @jayhillrubis 2 года назад +2

      Indeed, rose gold isn't that valuable and watchmaking isn't rocket science. lol

    • @DonLee1980
      @DonLee1980 2 года назад

      you could melt down the gold here and it would be worth several times that.

    • @garyboyle695
      @garyboyle695 2 года назад +1

      @@jayhillrubis 18 carat rose gold is just as valuable as any other 18 carat gold. Why would you think differently?

    • @mrc7966
      @mrc7966 2 года назад

      I think a couple of people have misunderstood...I'm not saying it's worth 3k, I'm saying that even if it was priced at 3k (which would be significantly under its true value I agree) I still wouldn't be interested in it. I don't like the design, I don't like the modern connotations of the brand, it's just not for me. I can think of plenty of watches which I'd prefer to have on my wrist, and they just so happen to be considerably cheaper.

    • @DM-rc4yu
      @DM-rc4yu 2 года назад +1

      @@DonLee1980 no

  • @jtopp26
    @jtopp26 2 года назад +1

    Worth every penny might be a stretch since you can buy a nice house where I live for 300k.

  • @stevelondonse23
    @stevelondonse23 2 года назад

    Excellent review, as usual Jenni!

  • @matthewdale956
    @matthewdale956 2 года назад +6

    Sorry, worth every penny is a ridiculous comment,a childrens hospital is “worth every penny” not this

    • @eduardovillalon7496
      @eduardovillalon7496 3 месяца назад

      Then wtf are you doing whining in a luxury watch channel? Go to see the Casios or Invictas and stop bitching here dude 🙄

  • @ericrosenburg657
    @ericrosenburg657 2 года назад +1

    The week of the year complication, excites me and intrigues me. Is that for, pious intentions? I’m just really curious about that one feature. Son of a preacher in me just wants to know if anyone has any insight.

  • @ianwoollard2063
    @ianwoollard2063 2 года назад +2

    It’s ridiculous in so many ways but it’s special in just as many others. The thing that blows me away is the complexity of the movement. Watch making genius

  • @Crispywithextrabutter
    @Crispywithextrabutter 2 года назад +5

    >a watch that costs the same as a house
    >worth every penny
    lol ok

  • @entertainme7523
    @entertainme7523 2 года назад +1

    Casio GA2100 with Ali Express case ✅

  • @UGA.D
    @UGA.D 2 года назад +1

    No watch is worth $300,000. No watch. And you're doing an incredible disservice to the hobby trying to normalize this type of ostentatious consumerism.

  • @thomaswidmann3443
    @thomaswidmann3443 2 года назад +1

    Hey Jenni !! Seen most of your video and am a big fan. Now this video , or lets focus on the watch, is ...out of reach probable not just for me. you talked about the Royal oak before. Really so much attention for a watch that very many will never afford/see anyway...?

  • @DonLee1980
    @DonLee1980 2 года назад +4

    Absolute stunning watch. I think that AP has the nicest rose gold. This perpetual calendar in such a thin watch is very impressive. Each case and bracelet go through the longest detailed finishing of all the luxury watches. There just aren't enough of these to go around. Tho I would prefer a titanium version, a watch I could wear every day. Gold is a bit over the top for me, but it seems like everyone is being more comfortable in wearing gold. Probably because a lot of stainless steel watches are worth as much if not more.

  • @jasonparfitt5936
    @jasonparfitt5936 2 года назад +1

    It’s hideous and not very attractive .Watches are about being good quality timepieces, and not having a grandfather clock on your wrist.

  • @Dontworryaboutanything
    @Dontworryaboutanything 2 года назад +2

    I thought I heard some Scottish in your voice. St Andrews sweatshirt now makes me think I was right. Hmmm wonder if I am

  • @agytjax
    @agytjax 2 года назад +1

    I recently bought a home for under $300k and I must say it is worth every penny ! @Jenni Elle - ever heard of being homeless and hunger ?

  • @ryanleung4228
    @ryanleung4228 2 года назад +1

    It is good. But not 300K good.
    I think nowadays, people just way to rich, has no feeling with numbers anymore.

  • @TheAmbitiousPeasant
    @TheAmbitiousPeasant 2 года назад +1

    Sorry but I could not take my focus off of the one hair stuck to the watch🤭

  • @alexdakar1994
    @alexdakar1994 2 года назад +4

    sorry but it doesn t worth 300 000 dollars

  • @romanr7232
    @romanr7232 2 года назад +1

    In 12-18 month it will cost 25k and nobody will want to buy. Trust me all this idiotic watch bubble will burst )))

  • @catfancy1708
    @catfancy1708 2 года назад +1

    for me this is not worth 300k. Even if I had the cash I would just see it an an investment in a safe. I mean its beautiful and awesome...but ..nar

  • @sailingsurgeons2116
    @sailingsurgeons2116 2 года назад +1

    Splash resistant toolwatch for 300k 😂😂😂 makes all pro’s irrelevant

  • @RaphaelBruninx
    @RaphaelBruninx 2 года назад +1

    😂😂😂 "price of a smaller appartment"
    300.000 is a big house over here😂

  • @ຮຸ່ແສງອໍາມາດລືໄຊ

    So beautiful but it has 40-38 min

  • @carycoller3140
    @carycoller3140 2 года назад +1

    I see that you have on two watches. I sometimes do that and people think something is wrong with me. I just like wearing a watch on each wrist sometimes.

  • @Noyb.265
    @Noyb.265 2 года назад +4

    Nope. The natural resources used to create that amount to a couple of hundred bucks. It's worth about $3,000 tops. It's also tacky. I wouldn't be caught dead wearing an AP.

    • @DonLee1980
      @DonLee1980 2 года назад

      a single troy oz of gold is worth $1930. That's just over 30g of gold. This watch weighs in at 254g, at 18kt gold. Even at a basic estimate, there could be up to 5oz of gold, which would make the raw materials of nearly $10k. The amount of time to hand build this watch, takes over 20x more than a Rolex day-date. AP does not sell this watch at $300k. It's that they can't make enough of them to go around that people don't mind paying more for one. A daytona in steel with almost NO finishing at all in the movement, is trading at nearly 60k. The raw materials in that certainly don't come up to $200.

    • @BrittPearceWatches
      @BrittPearceWatches 2 года назад +1

      😂😂😂 waaaay off.

  • @timewave02012
    @timewave02012 2 года назад +1

    Those aren't screws that are aligned on the front. Notice how they can't turn. The real screws on the back are not aligned.

  • @TheArchiver
    @TheArchiver 2 года назад +1

    This really show how phony and materialistic people are. A beautiful piece with great craftsmanship but in no way it worths 300k$.

  • @RoMusic2011
    @RoMusic2011 2 года назад

    I love this watch but you think it fits well if I have small wrist?

  • @tmears11
    @tmears11 2 года назад +1

    have you seen the time warrior nay seal watch? black face and navy blue and purple bezel?

  • @geoffhamby9384
    @geoffhamby9384 2 года назад +1

    $300k is the price of a 4 bedroom house in my town haha

  • @Zacattack32
    @Zacattack32 6 месяцев назад

    She made this video at the literal top. This watch is trading for $120k now

  • @AIRFORCEFREAK1
    @AIRFORCEFREAK1 2 года назад +1

    Did you say a small apartment would be 300k dollars or euros? Holy shit lol

  • @warusk2nd
    @warusk2nd 2 года назад +2

    I'm not a huge Royal Oak fan, but perpetual calendar are such a horological flex! Although it will be accurate until the year 2100... It will need to be serviced many times before then, so does that really even matter? Or is it more about showing how it will be accurate for several generations of owners?
    Great content, as always, Jenni!

  • @misterkelch
    @misterkelch 2 года назад +1

    245 or 254 grams? I was gonna buy two, but I'll have to wait now

  • @RiCH_926
    @RiCH_926 2 года назад +1

    Who cares about the watch Jenny you are extremely beautiful

  • @FXXFFX
    @FXXFFX 2 года назад +3

    The design is very beautiful, very evocative with the moon phase. But with all AP Royal Oaks, it's entirely too large (for me) to wear on my wrist, even with the smallest diameter available. It would look very fetching as a table clock, I wish AP had an option like that for the Royal Oak

  • @timeisahumanconstruct9251
    @timeisahumanconstruct9251 2 года назад +1

    Three hundreds dollars for a RO?!?!? Sign me up!

  • @tomhanna2714
    @tomhanna2714 2 года назад +1

    Neat watch and entertaining review, but I gots questions about that 'smaller apartment' business. $300,000 USD buys a HUGE house here in town and/or a nice place out in horse (cattle) country here in the Ozarks. Can. not. quite. wrap. my. head. around. it.

    • @bjoernaltmann
      @bjoernaltmann 2 года назад

      Very small studio flat in London/Paris/NY/Tokyo

  • @brynmawr12000
    @brynmawr12000 2 года назад +1

    Hi Jenni. Great vid. I have a few watches I rotate every week and have to reset them. What are ur thoughts on a watch winder? I read the could damage the watch. Thanks and look forward to hearing ur input.

  • @SergiRuiz_RelojeroTorpe
    @SergiRuiz_RelojeroTorpe 2 года назад +1

    Ptro Royal Oak, nothing new under the sun....

  • @ashleymowat2228
    @ashleymowat2228 2 года назад +1

    A non related question. I mainly love mechanical watches but why are there so few, if any, smooth sweep second hand quartz watches when these are plentiful and cheaply available in clocks?

  • @billybenson3834
    @billybenson3834 2 года назад +1

    Buy a gaudy Invicta and you can be like the rich folks

  • @katiewong2051
    @katiewong2051 2 года назад +2

    Great video Jenni! I'll agree with you that the watch looks great. Though it's a beautiful watch to be sure, I have to say that I will probably not spend my money on this watch (should I be able to afford it) 😅😅😅
    I've always found the Royal Oak and Nautilus too clunky and industrial looking... It's just not my cup of tea😅 But horses for courses am I right?

  • @Unfinished_sentenc
    @Unfinished_sentenc 2 года назад +1

    Thank you very much! Liked, subscribed and shared. My absolute favorite RUclips channel by far. This watch looks too flashy and 70’s for me

  • @sanjivrpatel
    @sanjivrpatel 2 года назад +1

    Hi Jenni,
    Great video, more frequent would be nice.
    Btw the “Screws” are actually bolts!
    Stay well.

  • @papricep6248
    @papricep6248 2 года назад +1

    I saw a guy wearing one of these in Chicago a few days ago and let out an audible 'woooo'.

  • @starkid20
    @starkid20 2 года назад +1

    ooooh I feel sooooo much even more poorer now watching this lol

  • @HiddenFiles
    @HiddenFiles 2 года назад +1

    20m water resistance?????

  • @saymyname218
    @saymyname218 2 года назад +2

    You are surprised that a 300k watch is only 9 mm? WTF!!

  • @theverbalremedy
    @theverbalremedy 2 года назад +1

    Hideous design, but that is again subjective.

  • @ArneAsada69
    @ArneAsada69 2 года назад +1

    Great close up videography.

  • @andrewwilson7537
    @andrewwilson7537 2 года назад +1

    I have to disagree with the premise of this video, and I don't think you explained your title very well. If I'm trying to justify the price of the Royal Oak QP, the obvious comp reference is the VC 4300V, which you can get on a full RG bracelet for well under $200k. Similar movement, similar finishing, similar size, similar history.

    • @DM-rc4yu
      @DM-rc4yu 2 года назад

      Well under $200k. As if it's some kind of a bargain lol. History? It's a fucking watch, made right now.

    • @andrewwilson7537
      @andrewwilson7537 2 года назад

      @@DM-rc4yu "We'll under $200k" means it's $100k less than the "worth every penny" watch that Jenni is selling.
      By "history", I'm just trying to describe that it's not a "me too" watch like the Piguet Polo. It's a well established piece that's just as relevant as the AP.

  • @carlofederico7778
    @carlofederico7778 2 года назад

    Honestly, a watch like that should have a complication for the seconds. The rest is just perfect

  • @friedpork_owl
    @friedpork_owl 2 года назад +2

    Absolutely beautiful, with space travel becoming more common I can see this becoming a great tool for keeping track of time, at home (in a breathtaking way;). Love!

  • @prollyded275
    @prollyded275 2 года назад +1

    It's not even the first day of April !

  • @prollyded275
    @prollyded275 2 года назад +1

    It's not even the first day of April !

  • @macoyupadoodle
    @macoyupadoodle 2 года назад +1

    And the maintenance costs half an apartment

  • @steffydog
    @steffydog 2 года назад +1

    Nice to see, but too busy, and no dot between 31 & 1?

  • @SoCalWatchReviews
    @SoCalWatchReviews 2 года назад +1

    The macros in this video are incredible 👏 great job guys!

  • @_Pearls4Swine
    @_Pearls4Swine 29 дней назад

    20 meters is 65 feet . certainly fine for showers and swimming. No one is swimming deeper than 65 feet unless they're diving or pro free divers, let's be realistic. If the watch can't handle it its rating, then it's simply dog shit. Why can Grand Seiko kick the shit out of an AP if it's dropped? Because Like ROLEX, AP is an old company that preys on new money. These companies need to be held to a hire standard and not just for dumb new money and peasants wanting to borrow for a video review.

  • @richmondwatches
    @richmondwatches 2 года назад +1

    Super Video
    Freundliche Grüsse
    Richmond Watchtes

  • @amagrz15
    @amagrz15 2 года назад +1

    WATER RESISTANCE is a joke.

  • @maynardgoff7321
    @maynardgoff7321 2 года назад +1

    Great work! Would love to see more such work. Beautiful watch, but a minute would have been enough. Hype brand increasingly turn me off. I like Swiss and German luxury that mere millionaires can buy.

  • @shogun884
    @shogun884 2 года назад

    If you happen to run a drug cartel it might be a good way of hiding your cash for a while, but thats about it , its a tour de force of watchmaking but just gaudy , if you happen to be a successful rapper it could be right up your alley

  • @averrodes4237
    @averrodes4237 2 года назад +1

    Waaauuu!!😲😲 A really, really masterpiece ✌️✌️😎

  • @GEMSofGOD_com
    @GEMSofGOD_com 2 года назад +2

    $300,000 and not in any way better than Casio GM-S2100PG-1A4ER

  • @oleg9ff
    @oleg9ff 2 года назад +1

    Nice watch. Beauty Jenni ❤️

  • @JamesAlexander14
    @JamesAlexander14 2 года назад +1

    Not really a lover of gold watches. Like the design though which is admittedly appearing to be dated. This watch does absolutely nothing for me in the long run though.