Flexible Diaphragm Collector Demand

Example from previous videos continued to calculate collector forces. Shows simple and difficult calculations. The value given for R for A2 and D2 is wrong (about 5:36). The correct value is 2.2443. This is just at typographical error and the subsequent calculations are correct. Recorded for CE 4650 at Cal State LA.

[@tonatiuhrodrigueznikl7816]

The value given for R for A2 and D2 is wrong (about 5:36). The correct value is 2.2443. This is just at typographical error and the subsequent calculations are correct.

[@rdtw8988]

Hi, thank you very much for making these series of videos. I benefit a lot from them. I like the way you present and explanation them, logically and easy to follow and very inspiring. Huge thanks again!!! Looking forwards to your future videos

[@tonatiuhrodrigueznikl7816]

Thanks for the feedback. Glad you like them.

[@alirezaghorbani2855]

Hi Dr. Tonatiuh,
I watched all the diaphragm topics which you presented and I really enjoyed it.
Thanks

[@anupshres007]

Hi thanks for this vid. can you post a video explaining collector connection to wall design. what forces to consider?

[@tonatiuhrodrigueznikl7816]

Collectors are certainly a difficult topic to visualize and I see the value in your suggestion. Thank you for making it; I'll keep it in mind.

[@min-jae]

감사합니다 도움이 많이되었네요!

[@venkatesh2285]

Could you please sone examples on how to design a lateral calculation when there is only one side and there is no walls on other sides?

[@tonatiuhrodrigueznikl7816]

To properly resist lateral loads, you need at least two lines of resistance, so I can't answer your question.

[@venkatesh2285]

@@tonatiuhrodrigueznikl7816 on other sides I have retaining wall but those are not upto roof height but I have steel column and beam in another side.

[@nestorgonzales2828]

Can you check your R for A2 and D2 for d = 10' and h = 8'

[@tonatiuhrodrigueznikl7816]

You are correct. The R for these is 2.2443. However, this is apparently just at typographical error and the subsequent calculations are correct. I'll get around to recutting and reposting the view sometime, but for now, viewers, please make note of the error.