back in the mid-80's, as a young engineer at McDonnell Douglas in the flight simulator group, I saw that they had a cockpit mocked up as the "cockpit of the future". It was a big screen, with all of the radar, nav, comm, etc., info all merged into one big display. This was when the F-18 was still new and the glass cockpit was evolving. They certainly knew where they wanted technology to go, but the display technology and processing power still needed a lot of development.
@@SkyhawkSteve There were 1980s artist renderings of the future fighter Man Machine Interface as well, with an HMD and full glass panel cockpit. Loral had some cool artwork that was featured in Aviation Week & Space Technology frequently. The actual systems development was going on right under our noses with the AFTI F-16 at Edwards AFB from about 1982-forward. It was always a cool plane to see and check out whatever cockpit variation they were using at the time.
That’s really incredible. My dad was a P51D fighter pilot in WW2. I wish he could have been here to see the latest and best fighter planes of today. I wonder what he would have thought about these planes.
Fascinating. It was cool to see how the instructor, Puff, walks around in front of the cockpit and reaches inside to assist. It makes using the simulator seem so easy. It's great that the air force is so open with their systems. Even after this great insight I still have absolutely no idea how it works🤗
What I’m most impressed is how automated everything is it’s truly like playing a video game. One thing I wish you could ask is how has this impacted training I would love detail video about what parts of training f35 pilots vs legacy aircraft pilots get Easier and harder what unique challenges or skills each pilot has when training in the f35 and weather the access of flight simulators like DCS or Microsoft flight simulator has any long term impacts on training future pilots when aircraft become more digital each year. Love to ask these questions
It’s harder to train a 4th Gen pilot to fight in the F-22A or F-35s because they have so many different task sets and task-switching habits trained in well, whereas a new pilot is fresh with no 4th Gen habits. Managing all the information is hard though, because there is so much more of it in a 5th Gen cockpit as you can see. 4th Gen has federated displays and systems where you have to HUD-Radar-RWR-FLIR scan, whereas this is all fused in the F-35 HMD and PCD. F-35 Situational Awareness is an unfair advantage, and even former F-22 pilots who have gone F-35A say they have more SA in the -35 than the -22. The F-22 has far more SA than legacy 4.5 Gen fighters, with huge gaps in sensor performance and fusion that don’t exist on legacy birds.
That was super interesting, so thank you to all involved. Two main thoughts in my head: first, the data sharing capabilities sound so much like what David Drake was describing in his novels in the 80s and 90s. Clearly everyone knew where they wanted to go, and now we're finally getting there. Second, I've been doing a lot of training for work this past fortnight, and have dealt with a wide range of instructor personalities and skill levels. "Puff" was just perfect, clear explanations, stead tone of voice, steady speed of instruction. I'm very impressed and I'm sure his students appreciate him!
Wow, This F -35 is just out of this world. Fantastic Experience and Future is for these Planes.I Simply saw this Clip 2 Times and I keep on watching such lovely Clips. Great.
@@reecechadwick8504 The original F-16A/B late 1970s APG-66 Radar still has classified features, and we haven't been using those in decades. Those were replaced by early F-16C/D Block 25 with APG-68, which has gone through 9 different upgrades before it was replaced in combat-coded F-16C/Ds with a new little AESA. The F-35 Block 3 AESA is in a more advanced place than those, already scheduled to be superceded by the Block 4 APG-85 AESA. The structures, weapons bays, EW, sensors, and systems coding are all highly classified with the F-35 program.
@@reecechadwick8504 the most highly classified systems are the EW systems. The sensors are very much weapons for the F35, the radar specifically can be used to eventually blind other radars, scramble it's own radar so it won't trigger RWR of other planes or make fake ghost targets when you have multiple F35s working together
Thanks, this was amazingly interesting and informative. I went from the F-8 (RF-8) Crusader to the F-14 and then the F-16N. The jumps in capabilities I saw are dwarfed by the jump to the F-35!
After a very long delay, for political reasons, Canada has finally ordered F-35’s. It will be several years before the initial deliveries but that may ensure we get models that are more advanced and give the RCAF time to upgrade its facilities and support systems and personnel to be ready for the new platform.
Great seeing you were given access. and nothing there was gung ho. it was a professional talking and demonstrating what is in the limits of what can be shown. GREAT that you got access. I'm just a Scale modeller but this made me want to built hat F-35C i have. Major thanks sent out from us viewers to the people giving you that access. and to you sir, for making these vids :)
Thank you so much Lockheed Martin for allowing Chris to show us the F35 flight simulator. It's near to see just how far we've come in flight technology. :)
I knew it! I was at AirPower24 and they had 4 USAF F-35 (maintenance crew said), one was on display and one was flying, 2 in a reserved hangar. Surely they were there to do more stuff behind closed doors. I’m jealous as I only managed to sit in the Gripen mockup
Really amazing content. Very interesting and thank you as well as all Patreons and off course Lockheed Martin for providing the opportunity to showcase some of what modern jet systems are about.
Fantastic material. I love old steam gauges just the same I appreciate these modern screens. F-35 is next-level stuff widely availalbe - there is no comparison for that. Thanks to all of you, Chris and all the hosts. Absolutely mind blowing information!
It's interesting to see how the displays have changed since the pre-production days. Unfortunately I don't remember the actual displays in the sim down in Fort Worth all that well, but I'm pretty sure the displays were smaller and configured differently. But it was many years ago, and I didn't see them in situ for that long.
I'm soo acustomed to flying the f35 in microsoft flight sim that I'm mechanically itching the pre dial my nav and autopilot the second I see the interface. The only thing shown here which is lacking in MCFS is the radar, which will be aded in the next update. The speed bleedoff during that maneuver and the angle shift is pretty indentical to the MCFS plane . Also, the plane in the game is slightly less sensitive on takeoff. Those guys at indiafoxtecho really nailed the thing with the game addon. Fantastic video.
Looks like Chris is moving up in the world. Well done. Good video and thanks to Lockheed Martin for giving us a small glimpse of what their aircraft can do.
@@martinw245 Haha that is so funny . @therealCG62 - The F16, F22 and the F35A are all available as default aircraft in Prepar3D with proper flight modeling. They allow a proper move from 4th gen to 5th gen for a home simulator.
For all the serious videos that you do, I'd love to see you tackle some other media types, like anime series, and give your thoughts and opinions. The first anime series I'd love to see you talk about and critique would be "The Magnificent Kotobuki" about a squadron of female fighter pilots and their enemies who all fly WWII-era fighters. The anime itself is "ok" but I'd love to just hear you talk about the planes, and any historical accuracies or inaccuracies. From the planes themselves to the fighter group tactics, and so on. You could easily do a series of videos reacting to each episode, or just watch the series on your own time and then do a single video on the series. However you did it, I just wanna see you talk about the series and the planes in it..
Fascinating insight, thank you, and well managed by Lockheed Martin too. Your content and credentials are evolving nicely. Mit freundlichen Grüßen from Lindau Bodensee.
We see offensive sims often, but I’d love to see a simulation of what the pilots’d see + do when facing multi-layered threats, including SAMS, electronic warfare, air-to-air missiles, MANPADS, etc.
This was awesome. It’s so hard to communicate the advantages of this plane without going to classified territory. So much of it is EW, and that’s some of the most secret information out there. I hear all the time about situational awareness and information management, but you can’t get an inkling of how advantageous it is without seeing how it works inside the cockpit. Lockheed Martin should do A LOT more public engagement this way. I’ve got no ground to stand on with this, but I’ve seen a couple of pilots who apparently were trained on the jet seemingly giving BS answers about the plane’s performance. One of them, it seemed to me, seemed like he was giving answers trashing the plane just to appease the two other pilot hosts who had never flown it. I guess what I’m trying to say is that there seems to be a lot of misinformation even within the fighter pilot community. Edit: comment on a decent chunk of RUclips fighter pilots being low key drama queens deleted, even though I’m sure nobody would take offense to this. 😅
@@Foxtrott_4 Can you customize every single window and menu, swap in between set presets etc., control with touch or sidestick like in that video here?
How do they get around lack of tactile feedback when using touchscreens? It seems like it would be a huge ergonomics problem e.g. flying formation when you're eyes on lead, then you've gotta switch radio freqs/channels without taking your eyes off lead. Also weird how he talks about zooming/breaking out radar contacts and seeing what the wingman is targeting via datalink as something new when it's been a thing in 4th gen fighters since the mid 2000s.
That RCS screen is very peculiar. Even though it has probably have nothing to do with the reality (seems that highest visibility is in head-on aspect), I can clearly see how it could be extremely useful. Keep your threat emitters to the lowest RCS aspects until the time is right.
Likely in an upcoming video. The interface on the screen is quite different as both jets have distinct capabilities (example that separate screen on F-35 providing feedback on detectability). Also, I did not yet see the FLIR screen integration on Gripen (during my session).
Awesome report!! Cool cockpit but the whole time I was trying to find pitotstatic gages as a backup. Electrical problems can put pilots in a similar situation with dead panels and dead helmet. What is the backup for these $100 birds? I think of friends who flew around Carriers or LHA/LHDs trying to find Mother during IFR conditions with the HUD out.
We worked hard AF to make it simple. In the early days pilots kept trying to get us to put buttons and switches back in the jet. Some systems did earn their way back into the jet, you can see the center console has some knobs and a few dedicated displays. For the most part though, the increase in speed and efficiency is just too good to pass up.
If you look at start-up procedures, in-flight tasks, and maintenance, this cockpit smokes legacy cockpits. Legacy cockpits have a black box behind every display and panel, with wiring coming out of the back that flows into the wiring harnesses. They are a nightmare to maintain, doubled in 2-seaters. Corrosion, G forces, dust, sand, moisture, and wear and tear wreak havoc on cockpits. This is one of the several reasons why it’s so much easier to operate and maintain F-35s vs 4th Gen. Look at the MMH/FH numbers if you have doubts.
@@cadennorris960 The workload shifted from managing sensors and systems through federated displays, to managing decisions on targets, timeline, placement, and signature exposure/concealment. They have their work cut out for them for sure.
Thank you for this video, and thank you to LM for allowing it, because a lot of us Western taxpayers don't have enough access to see some of the new capabilities of the stuff we pay for. We should not see everything, but for a long time we have had to have a lot of pure faith in the F-35. It starts to earn some honest trust, when we see stuff like this.
The F-35 is like a muscle car packed with a server room. The fuselage skin is like the gigantic hood bulge of a hot rod muscle car with an over sized powerplant.
As much as the F-35 project has been an example of how not to run a development and construction project. The stuff developed really shows just how much of a leap has been taken. From memory the only other aircraft currently coming close to this level of sensor fusion and avionics as a platform is the Rafale. The video also shows why so many other manufacturers, military and civilian, are putting so much into developing system platforms to more easily support integration of functional modules. Oh, and as a side note. Just think of how crazy advanced what was shown was. Then put it in the context that this is the stuff they're publicly showing.
"As much as the F-35 project has been an example of how not to run a development and construction project. " Says who? You do realise there are now over 1000 F35s delivered. and the cost benefit anaylsis available when compared to other AC in service is putting them in out in front. The F35 variants are also putting the 16 nations that are using them on a good footing for the 6th gen AC to come.
@@zorbakaput8537 This is not some new or wild observation. The F-35 turned out great, but there were multiple hiccups along the way that easily could have gone better. Simple as that.
What would be a good example of a program management where a multi-service 5.5 Gen VLO fighter was developed, tested, produced, and refined? There isn’t any precedence for this. Congress interfered with mandating stupid 7085 aluminum for all the bulkheads so their mafia family handlers and strategic materials contracts could be serviced, but other than that, it has been wildly successful. Rafale does not have anywhere near the sensor count or closed-loop sensor fusion that JSF has. Totally different ballgame, and the Rafale is a great system, just not really like JSF. The closest sensor architecture platform to F-35 is the F-22, which is a giant leap over all of the 4.5 Gen fighters.
@@kentunemo5866 Gripen E has no tricks that compare with JSF. It doesn’t even have 4th Gen raw performance for starters, and is still under development with airframe structural changes being made. Sweden made a huge strategic mistake by going with a single F404 motor platform to replace the Viggen. They should have done a licensed contract manufacture of F/A-18 or F-16, putting them in position to join the JSF family now.
The airplane is ok, the project management needs improvement. Supposedly uses Just in time for spare parts, which is good for a family car but not for a warplane.
The gen. public thought the eye-watering numbers they were seeing were just for acquisition instead of the entire lifetime costs including _70 years_ worth of sustainment or that the R&D would be used on dozens of other types of aircraft. The F-35 now costs less than many 4th gen. aircraft and a lot less than platforms like the F-14.
@@shaider1982 If you don’t know what a great airframe and systems suite looks like, you would say the airplane is ok. The air-vehicle itself is phenomenal just from a performance and safety standpoint, unprecedented really. Every new production series we have gone through involved the dilemma of parts going to production or spares. Demand is extremely high for both.
@@lars9966 F-35 is under-budget for acquisition. 1995 cap was $50 million unit flyaway. That would be $103.28 million today (2024). F-35A unit flyaway is $77.9m. If you want a good example of acquisition and RDT&E budget excursions, look at the F-14A. RDT&E for the F401-PW-400 killed their developmental budget already in the 1970s, which had long-term consequences into the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. F-14A was never supposed to be mass-produced because it was under-powered with an unreliable motor. F-14B/F401 was supposed to be the mass-produced Tomcat with a 28,000lb thrust engine, but they had the same problems with the F401. They spent hundreds of millions on F401 RDT&E already in the 1970s.
Good stuff, Lockheed. The more widely known all the new capes being provided to our forces, the more disposed we will be to being politically supportive of the large funding required for these platforms.
It’s more affordable than any other fighter on the market. Low price point for acquisition, low maintenance hours, costs the same to fly as an F-16, but one major difference is you don’t lose them at rates like legacy fighters are written off. ROI is much better with F-35s, as is pilot safety.
@@LRRPFco52 Agreed on most of that, but we won’t truly know how drastically loss rates are due to its LO unless we get into a PoP war and by the time we do, it might be drastically different to what it would be today. The 4th and 5th gens are complementary in many ways. For example, nothing can carry more munitions or see further than an F-15EX not counting C-130s and the like using rapid dragon.
All these fancy digital cockpit. how well does it fare against nuclear radiation/blast ? Many years ago i read the reason that Soviet have kept their six basic analog instruments as backup in case when nuclear war breaks out. Is it true analog instruments fare well against nuclear blast ?
honest question: aren't those touchscreens difficult to operate when there are g-forces and vibration involved? i always have a hell of a time operating touchscreens in the car, while buttons usuially work much better for me.
Whether it's my phone, the ATM, my tablet, or something else, I often have trouble getting touchscreens to register my presses correctly. Sometimes the button on the screen even flashes to indicate that the machine knows I pressed it, but for some reason my press wasn't up to its standards, so it does nothing.
@@jeffbangle4710 The screens in the F35 (actually all modern aircraft touch screens) work on a different principle than phones/tablets. While normal phone screens detect the heat from your fingertip, the F35 screens are covered with an invisible grid of laser beams and sensors. When a pilot presses on the F35 screen, his fingertip interrupts some of the laser beams and the touch location is determined based on which beams were interrupted. These screens are less likely to not register a touch and also allow pilots to operate them while wearing gloves.
back in the mid-80's, as a young engineer at McDonnell Douglas in the flight simulator group, I saw that they had a cockpit mocked up as the "cockpit of the future". It was a big screen, with all of the radar, nav, comm, etc., info all merged into one big display. This was when the F-18 was still new and the glass cockpit was evolving. They certainly knew where they wanted technology to go, but the display technology and processing power still needed a lot of development.
Interesting that it looks like they haven't updated the fonts since then, all the text still reminds me of playing a game of Battlezone.
@@moosemaimer They are easy to read. That is all that matters.
@@andersjjensenPlus they're already paid for.
@@SkyhawkSteve There were 1980s artist renderings of the future fighter Man Machine Interface as well, with an HMD and full glass panel cockpit. Loral had some cool artwork that was featured in Aviation Week & Space Technology frequently.
The actual systems development was going on right under our noses with the AFTI F-16 at Edwards AFB from about 1982-forward. It was always a cool plane to see and check out whatever cockpit variation they were using at the time.
Did you ever consider how many innocents are killed by US tech all over the world? Shame on you people.
It was very cool of Lockheed to bring you in & to give us all a tour of the F-35 cockpit👍
thanks :)
Wow! I 👀
Thanks to you, and Lockheed Martin, for allowing us to get a insider's view of how the F-35 performs! 👍
Glad you enjoyed it!
Having read about these systems, I understood how they worked but seeing them in action really convinced me of their capabilities.
That’s really incredible. My dad was a P51D fighter pilot in WW2. I wish he could have been here to see the latest and best fighter planes of today. I wonder what he would have thought about these planes.
Fascinating. It was cool to see how the instructor, Puff, walks around in front of the cockpit and reaches inside to assist. It makes using the simulator seem so easy. It's great that the air force is so open with their systems. Even after this great insight I still have absolutely no idea how it works🤗
What I’m most impressed is how automated everything is it’s truly like playing a video game. One thing I wish you could ask is how has this impacted training I would love detail video about what parts of training f35 pilots vs legacy aircraft pilots get Easier and harder what unique challenges or skills each pilot has when training in the f35 and weather the access of flight simulators like DCS or Microsoft flight simulator has any long term impacts on training future pilots when aircraft become more digital each year. Love to ask these questions
I'll note them down :)
It’s harder to train a 4th Gen pilot to fight in the F-22A or F-35s because they have so many different task sets and task-switching habits trained in well, whereas a new pilot is fresh with no 4th Gen habits. Managing all the information is hard though, because there is so much more of it in a 5th Gen cockpit as you can see. 4th Gen has federated displays and systems where you have to HUD-Radar-RWR-FLIR scan, whereas this is all fused in the F-35 HMD and PCD. F-35 Situational Awareness is an unfair advantage, and even former F-22 pilots who have gone F-35A say they have more SA in the -35 than the -22. The F-22 has far more SA than legacy 4.5 Gen fighters, with huge gaps in sensor performance and fusion that don’t exist on legacy birds.
Salute to everyone delivering a payload while watching this video. Love that you get all these cool experiences, Chris! Well-earned.
Naaah. Chris just joined the Marines to get access.
So to speak.
Tons of thanks Chris!
That was super interesting, so thank you to all involved. Two main thoughts in my head: first, the data sharing capabilities sound so much like what David Drake was describing in his novels in the 80s and 90s. Clearly everyone knew where they wanted to go, and now we're finally getting there. Second, I've been doing a lot of training for work this past fortnight, and have dealt with a wide range of instructor personalities and skill levels. "Puff" was just perfect, clear explanations, stead tone of voice, steady speed of instruction. I'm very impressed and I'm sure his students appreciate him!
Wow, This F -35 is just out of this world. Fantastic Experience and Future is for these Planes.I Simply saw this Clip 2 Times and I keep on watching such lovely Clips. Great.
Beautiful demonstration. Love the information that this plane is able to display. Just even the sensor aspect of it is insane.
So interesting that the explanation of systems aided by your questions was spot on. It's so impressive. Many thanks both.
Thank you Christoph, Puff and Lockheed Martin for an excellent and informative video. Cheers from NZ🇳🇿.
Excellent video Chris! And thanks Lockheed Martin for giving us all a cool demo!
A definite big THANK YOU from me - mI never expected to be able to see such an accurate representation of inside this cockpit. Thank you
If this much is declassified, scary to think what IS classified...
@@alibadawi3398 not much probably
@@reecechadwick8504 The original F-16A/B late 1970s APG-66 Radar still has classified features, and we haven't been using those in decades. Those were replaced by early F-16C/D Block 25 with APG-68, which has gone through 9 different upgrades before it was replaced in combat-coded F-16C/Ds with a new little AESA.
The F-35 Block 3 AESA is in a more advanced place than those, already scheduled to be superceded by the Block 4 APG-85 AESA.
The structures, weapons bays, EW, sensors, and systems coding are all highly classified with the F-35 program.
@@LRRPFco52 Wow thank you for this info, interesting read.
@@reecechadwick8504 the most highly classified systems are the EW systems. The sensors are very much weapons for the F35, the radar specifically can be used to eventually blind other radars, scramble it's own radar so it won't trigger RWR of other planes or make fake ghost targets when you have multiple F35s working together
probably lots of interesting ew capabilities
This video has me feeling nostalgic for when i went to LockMar in 07 and flew the jsf sim
Thanks, this was amazingly interesting and informative. I went from the F-8 (RF-8) Crusader to the F-14 and then the F-16N. The jumps in capabilities I saw are dwarfed by the jump to the F-35!
This is so awesome! 5th gen displays and capabilities are a huge step up from 4th gen.
After a very long delay, for political reasons, Canada has finally ordered F-35’s. It will be several years before the initial deliveries but that may ensure we get models that are more advanced and give the RCAF time to upgrade its facilities and support systems and personnel to be ready for the new platform.
It ain't done yet. Plenty of time remaining for Trudeau to screw it up.
@@hlynnkeith9334 Trudea is on life-support. If it gets screwed up, it will be the civil service.
@@ronhudson3730 You have a point. Thanks for the addition.
I hope Trudeau loses, he is as bad as Biden and Kamala!
why Canada need such an expensive aircraft ? does it even have any enemies?
as a Finn I'm absolutely sure we did the right choice. And I was really happy to hear that first planes come to my hometown base in next year.
Every aircraft is a 2 seater if you’re friendly enough. I’d sit on someone’s lap for a ride 😅
Hah!
Great seeing you were given access. and nothing there was gung ho. it was a professional talking and demonstrating what is in the limits of what can be shown. GREAT that you got access. I'm just a Scale modeller but this made me want to built hat F-35C i have. Major thanks sent out from us viewers to the people giving you that access. and to you sir, for making these vids :)
Thank you so much Lockheed Martin for allowing Chris to show us the F35 flight simulator. It's near to see just how far we've come in flight technology. :)
I knew it! I was at AirPower24 and they had 4 USAF F-35 (maintenance crew said), one was on display and one was flying, 2 in a reserved hangar. Surely they were there to do more stuff behind closed doors.
I’m jealous as I only managed to sit in the Gripen mockup
Very interesting and informative video! And thanks, Lockheed for giving Chris access to the cockpit and film this.
Danke an Christoph, Puff & Lockheed Martin für dieses schöne Video. Denke das die Luftwaffe einen guten Kauf getätigt hat mit der Anschaffung de F35.
Wo isn das ?
Best video on YT ever! Asking the kinds of questions we all want to know.
Really amazing content. Very interesting and thank you as well as all Patreons and off course Lockheed Martin for providing the opportunity to showcase some of what modern jet systems are about.
That was a fascinating overview of how the F-35 operations and targeting are done.
This is really nice we get to see this, thanks to Lockheed martins and Chris for this wonderful showcase ❤
Fantastic material. I love old steam gauges just the same I appreciate these modern screens. F-35 is next-level stuff widely availalbe - there is no comparison for that. Thanks to all of you, Chris and all the hosts. Absolutely mind blowing information!
Simply awe inspiring. Thank you so much, Bismark and L-M!
Great Video, thx from Germany
Great pointing out the relevance of feedback. Loved the video!
you are building such a solid channel, I love it!
It's interesting to see how the displays have changed since the pre-production days. Unfortunately I don't remember the actual displays in the sim down in Fort Worth all that well, but I'm pretty sure the displays were smaller and configured differently. But it was many years ago, and I didn't see them in situ for that long.
That was great. Most interesting. Never really understood the power of the F-35 till now.
Very interesting and quite a coup to get the access!
This was amazing i really hope they let u show more of this!
I'm soo acustomed to flying the f35 in microsoft flight sim that I'm mechanically itching the pre dial my nav and autopilot the second I see the interface. The only thing shown here which is lacking in MCFS is the radar, which will be aded in the next update. The speed bleedoff during that maneuver and the angle shift is pretty indentical to the MCFS plane . Also, the plane in the game is slightly less sensitive on takeoff. Those guys at indiafoxtecho really nailed the thing with the game addon. Fantastic video.
Brilliant video thanks! The best/most in depth f35 systems video iv seen
Looks like Chris is moving up in the world. Well done. Good video and thanks to Lockheed Martin for giving us a small glimpse of what their aircraft can do.
Doubtful it'll happen in our lifetimes, but man I hope we get to play around with this thing in a detailed simulator at some point.
F35 is in MS FS 2020.
@@martinw245 Haha that is so funny .
@therealCG62 - The F16, F22 and the F35A are all available as default aircraft in Prepar3D with proper flight modeling. They allow a proper move from 4th gen to 5th gen for a home simulator.
@@martinw245but it isn’t a detailed simulation. Especially not of the radar and other systems which are the interesting things
@@thurbine2411
True.
This is just what I wanted from Lockheed Martin. More please! Thanks.
For all the serious videos that you do, I'd love to see you tackle some other media types, like anime series, and give your thoughts and opinions. The first anime series I'd love to see you talk about and critique would be "The Magnificent Kotobuki" about a squadron of female fighter pilots and their enemies who all fly WWII-era fighters. The anime itself is "ok" but I'd love to just hear you talk about the planes, and any historical accuracies or inaccuracies. From the planes themselves to the fighter group tactics, and so on. You could easily do a series of videos reacting to each episode, or just watch the series on your own time and then do a single video on the series. However you did it, I just wanna see you talk about the series and the planes in it..
Pretty cool they let you in the simulator for a demo.
Yea, we need that in DCS ASAP!!!!!
@@MohamedBabiker90 4real 😀
Awesome content, awesome effort. Many thanks for this!
Fascinating insight, thank you, and well managed by Lockheed Martin too.
Your content and credentials are evolving nicely.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen from Lindau Bodensee.
Thanks for this. Cool to see and really appreciated.
Thanks Chris & Lockheed for this amazing demonstration ! This would even make Luke Skywalker envious ! 😅
We see offensive sims often, but I’d love to see a simulation of what the pilots’d see + do when facing multi-layered threats, including SAMS, electronic warfare, air-to-air missiles, MANPADS, etc.
OK this rules. Good work to you, Lockheed Martin and Carlton Wilson. The F-35 is a friggin spaceship.
Amazing tech, shown to good effect by your very well informed and to the point questions 😊
This was awesome. It’s so hard to communicate the advantages of this plane without going to classified territory. So much of it is EW, and that’s some of the most secret information out there. I hear all the time about situational awareness and information management, but you can’t get an inkling of how advantageous it is without seeing how it works inside the cockpit.
Lockheed Martin should do A LOT more public engagement this way. I’ve got no ground to stand on with this, but I’ve seen a couple of pilots who apparently were trained on the jet seemingly giving BS answers about the plane’s performance. One of them, it seemed to me, seemed like he was giving answers trashing the plane just to appease the two other pilot hosts who had never flown it. I guess what I’m trying to say is that there seems to be a lot of misinformation even within the fighter pilot community.
Edit: comment on a decent chunk of RUclips fighter pilots being low key drama queens deleted, even though I’m sure nobody would take offense to this. 😅
Fantastic video!
This was really cool to see, thanks
The radar being used on the SA page makes so much sense, i wonder why no earlier jets could do it
Really interesting video. Thanks 🙏🏻
This made me realize how accurately VTOL VR is for it beeing a game in regards to the displays
Or ace combat...
@@Foxtrott_4 Can you customize every single window and menu, swap in between set presets etc., control with touch or sidestick like in that video here?
@@DrJump3r no, I was thinking about the HUD, but yeah you were talking about the displays
How do they get around lack of tactile feedback when using touchscreens? It seems like it would be a huge ergonomics problem e.g. flying formation when you're eyes on lead, then you've gotta switch radio freqs/channels without taking your eyes off lead. Also weird how he talks about zooming/breaking out radar contacts and seeing what the wingman is targeting via datalink as something new when it's been a thing in 4th gen fighters since the mid 2000s.
Impressive systems. They’re improving too!
Awesome. Thank you for sharing!
I'd love to see the hand controls your using to interface with the displays.
amazing, i envy those who were fortunate enough to work on the aircraft SW and QA.
Great video!
That RCS screen is very peculiar. Even though it has probably have nothing to do with the reality (seems that highest visibility is in head-on aspect), I can clearly see how it could be extremely useful. Keep your threat emitters to the lowest RCS aspects until the time is right.
The MSFS version is wild for being that close.
Be funny if the pilot had a message board where they share the “Meta” and their favorite display settings
@@MetalFalcon99 Perhaps they can save custom user profiles (like we have in games or business software) and share those. ;)
@@tver Lockheed get on this
@@MetalFalcon99 with a live stream to Twitch, right? Heh.
They do. Stuff like “R Space”
As you have been in the Gripen E simulator also any comparisons?
Likely in an upcoming video. The interface on the screen is quite different as both jets have distinct capabilities (example that separate screen on F-35 providing feedback on detectability). Also, I did not yet see the FLIR screen integration on Gripen (during my session).
Woah! Amazing information.
How is the stealth display read? I couldn't quite figure it out
Warning indicators are flashing when VLO is compromised in some way, whether it be used of Afterburner or bay doors open in this demo.
Very interesting! Thank you.
Amazing, what an incredible aircraft 👌
Awesome report!! Cool cockpit but the whole time I was trying to find pitotstatic gages as a backup. Electrical problems can put pilots in a similar situation with dead panels and dead helmet. What is the backup for these $100 birds? I think of friends who flew around Carriers or LHA/LHDs trying to find Mother during IFR conditions with the HUD out.
Interestingly, the cockpit is surprisingly simple.
We worked hard AF to make it simple.
In the early days pilots kept trying to get us to put buttons and switches back in the jet.
Some systems did earn their way back into the jet, you can see the center console has some knobs and a few dedicated displays.
For the most part though, the increase in speed and efficiency is just too good to pass up.
If you look at start-up procedures, in-flight tasks, and maintenance, this cockpit smokes legacy cockpits. Legacy cockpits have a black box behind every display and panel, with wiring coming out of the back that flows into the wiring harnesses. They are a nightmare to maintain, doubled in 2-seaters. Corrosion, G forces, dust, sand, moisture, and wear and tear wreak havoc on cockpits. This is one of the several reasons why it’s so much easier to operate and maintain F-35s vs 4th Gen. Look at the MMH/FH numbers if you have doubts.
Simple and yet provides much better situational awareness and much less workload. It is the best design of any fighter to exist so far.
@@cadennorris960 The workload shifted from managing sensors and systems through federated displays, to managing decisions on targets, timeline, placement, and signature exposure/concealment. They have their work cut out for them for sure.
Thank you Chris, and thank you Lockheed Martin.
Pretty wild how they say no cameras and then gave him such VIP access,
Yes so he can show the world … Hmmmmmm ?
What a legend!
I miss my P3D setup.Thanks LM.
Thank you for this video, and thank you to LM for allowing it, because a lot of us Western taxpayers don't have enough access to see some of the new capabilities of the stuff we pay for. We should not see everything, but for a long time we have had to have a lot of pure faith in the F-35. It starts to earn some honest trust, when we see stuff like this.
Thank you LockMart
Chris, like a kid in a candy store...
Huge thanks to Lockheed Martin and Puff for providing this sort of interaction with them. Great job!
Joke of jokes. The F 35. Totally obsolete in an era of drones that should’ve been anticipated decades ago. The US military are idiots
Awesome.... absolutely awesome!
Nice score.
The F-35 is like a muscle car packed with a server room. The fuselage skin is like the gigantic hood bulge of a hot rod muscle car with an over sized powerplant.
Love this plane..!
As much as the F-35 project has been an example of how not to run a development and construction project. The stuff developed really shows just how much of a leap has been taken. From memory the only other aircraft currently coming close to this level of sensor fusion and avionics as a platform is the Rafale. The video also shows why so many other manufacturers, military and civilian, are putting so much into developing system platforms to more easily support integration of functional modules.
Oh, and as a side note. Just think of how crazy advanced what was shown was. Then put it in the context that this is the stuff they're publicly showing.
"As much as the F-35 project has been an example of how not to run a development and construction project. " Says who? You do realise there are now over 1000 F35s delivered. and the cost benefit anaylsis available when compared to other AC in service is putting them in out in front. The F35 variants are also putting the 16 nations that are using them on a good footing for the 6th gen AC to come.
As a Swede i root for the JAS 39 Gripen E ! Has some tricks up the sleeve that F35 lacks...😊
@@zorbakaput8537 This is not some new or wild observation. The F-35 turned out great, but there were multiple hiccups along the way that easily could have gone better. Simple as that.
What would be a good example of a program management where a multi-service 5.5 Gen VLO fighter was developed, tested, produced, and refined? There isn’t any precedence for this. Congress interfered with mandating stupid 7085 aluminum for all the bulkheads so their mafia family handlers and strategic materials contracts could be serviced, but other than that, it has been wildly successful. Rafale does not have anywhere near the sensor count or closed-loop sensor fusion that JSF has. Totally different ballgame, and the Rafale is a great system, just not really like JSF. The closest sensor architecture platform to F-35 is the F-22, which is a giant leap over all of the 4.5 Gen fighters.
@@kentunemo5866 Gripen E has no tricks that compare with JSF. It doesn’t even have 4th Gen raw performance for starters, and is still under development with airframe structural changes being made. Sweden made a huge strategic mistake by going with a single F404 motor platform to replace the Viggen. They should have done a licensed contract manufacture of F/A-18 or F-16, putting them in position to join the JSF family now.
thats straight up science fiction... and people still call this aircraft failed
The airplane is ok, the project management needs improvement. Supposedly uses Just in time for spare parts, which is good for a family car but not for a warplane.
@@shaider1982 i agree, but the history of aircraft weapon systems being 4 times or even more expensive than actually intended goes even back to ww2
The gen. public thought the eye-watering numbers they were seeing were just for acquisition instead of the entire lifetime costs including _70 years_ worth of sustainment or that the R&D would be used on dozens of other types of aircraft. The F-35 now costs less than many 4th gen. aircraft and a lot less than platforms like the F-14.
@@shaider1982 If you don’t know what a great airframe and systems suite looks like, you would say the airplane is ok. The air-vehicle itself is phenomenal just from a performance and safety standpoint, unprecedented really. Every new production series we have gone through involved the dilemma of parts going to production or spares. Demand is extremely high for both.
@@lars9966 F-35 is under-budget for acquisition. 1995 cap was $50 million unit flyaway. That would be $103.28 million today (2024). F-35A unit flyaway is $77.9m. If you want a good example of acquisition and RDT&E budget excursions, look at the F-14A. RDT&E for the F401-PW-400 killed their developmental budget already in the 1970s, which had long-term consequences into the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. F-14A was never supposed to be mass-produced because it was under-powered with an unreliable motor. F-14B/F401 was supposed to be the mass-produced Tomcat with a 28,000lb thrust engine, but they had the same problems with the F401. They spent hundreds of millions on F401 RDT&E already in the 1970s.
Good stuff, Lockheed. The more widely known all the new capes being provided to our forces, the more disposed we will be to being politically supportive of the large funding required for these platforms.
It’s more affordable than any other fighter on the market. Low price point for acquisition, low maintenance hours, costs the same to fly as an F-16, but one major difference is you don’t lose them at rates like legacy fighters are written off. ROI is much better with F-35s, as is pilot safety.
@@LRRPFco52 Agreed on most of that, but we won’t truly know how drastically loss rates are due to its LO unless we get into a PoP war and by the time we do, it might be drastically different to what it would be today. The 4th and 5th gens are complementary in many ways. For example, nothing can carry more munitions or see further than an F-15EX not counting C-130s and the like using rapid dragon.
All these fancy digital cockpit. how well does it fare against nuclear radiation/blast ?
Many years ago i read the reason that Soviet have kept their six basic analog instruments as backup in case when nuclear war breaks out.
Is it true analog instruments fare well against nuclear blast ?
Since it's certified to deploy B61, just fine I'd assume.
russia did that in the 60s, their newer jets are unflyable without electronics
so basically Ace Combat's HUD but irl :D
honest question: aren't those touchscreens difficult to operate when there are g-forces and vibration involved? i always have a hell of a time operating touchscreens in the car, while buttons usuially work much better for me.
I think that if you're pulling a lot of Gs, your hands are on your throttle and stick.
Whether it's my phone, the ATM, my tablet, or something else, I often have trouble getting touchscreens to register my presses correctly. Sometimes the button on the screen even flashes to indicate that the machine knows I pressed it, but for some reason my press wasn't up to its standards, so it does nothing.
@@jeffbangle4710 The screens in the F35 (actually all modern aircraft touch screens) work on a different principle than phones/tablets. While normal phone screens detect the heat from your fingertip, the F35 screens are covered with an invisible grid of laser beams and sensors. When a pilot presses on the F35 screen, his fingertip interrupts some of the laser beams and the touch location is determined based on which beams were interrupted. These screens are less likely to not register a touch and also allow pilots to operate them while wearing gloves.
@@MrRobertX70
Most modern consumer touch screen are a variant of capacitive type. It has nothing to do with heat.
@@jintsuubest9331 You're right.
Did they give you a discount code to use at checkout if we want to buy one?
is the cabin digital dash board customizable?
Thanks.
4th gen fighters' instruments panel look much cooler than that. Change my mind.
Looking cool isn't really important
I half expect one of these videos to be you flying combat missions in Ukraine discussing targeting systems on a Gripen upgrade or something.