It isn't the original sold from 1982, but the Limited Edition (LE) which was introduced in 2011 with ARM7. If you wanna see how the original performance is, check ruclips.net/video/ar0G55iAS7U/видео.html
@@nobumaxzuki So HP re-issued it with an ARM in 2011? I wasn't aware of that. Anyway, why is the DM-15 even slower? Doesn't it have a newer, faster ARM?
@@tonykara Yes HP did, said x100 as fast as original, and it is faster than DM-15. Both use the emulator but the ROM is different. HP uses its own, and I believe SM uses the open source. HP-15 LE runs ARM7, I believe @ tens MHz, and DM-15 runs ARM Cortex-M0 @ 12MHz. No fair spec based benchmark possible, other than running the complex math like this video.
![🇺🇸 HP-15C Collectors Edition [TCE #0405]](/img/1.gif)
Wow, the original runs faster? That's a surprise.
It isn't the original sold from 1982, but the Limited Edition (LE) which was introduced in 2011 with ARM7. If you wanna see how the original performance is, check ruclips.net/video/ar0G55iAS7U/видео.html
@@nobumaxzuki So HP re-issued it with an ARM in 2011? I wasn't aware of that. Anyway, why is the DM-15 even slower? Doesn't it have a newer, faster ARM?
@@tonykara Yes HP did, said x100 as fast as original, and it is faster than DM-15. Both use the emulator but the ROM is different. HP uses its own, and I believe SM uses the open source. HP-15 LE runs ARM7, I believe @ tens MHz, and DM-15 runs ARM Cortex-M0 @ 12MHz. No fair spec based benchmark possible, other than running the complex math like this video.
@@tonykarait has been re-issued again with an even caster processor and capability to emulat the HL-16C.