Thank you for the comparison. Do you know. If Hatch allows input & export “FCM” Brother Scan N Cut file format. Embrilliance allows FCM format, but I really like what I see with Hatch and would purchase it if they support FCM format.
My impression is: If one compares the full versions and the price points Embrilliance gives you the most bang for the buck. I haven't found any function I need which other softwares have and Embrilliance doesn't. Okay, it doesn't come with auto-digitizing - where there is a semi-workaround with creating a .svg with inkscape and using that. It doesn't have foto to stitch - which I seldom see in the wild so I'm guessing the results are mostly mediocre. Also a big + + + is the BX-Font creator.
Your audio commentary was so quiet I could not hear it well enough to understand. Thank you for the embroidery comparison as I am having a difficult time finding anything like this,
Thanks....I found your comparative analysis very helpful.😊
thank you for the comparison. I have Embird and I wish they had more up-to-date tutorials.
Thank you for the comparison. Do you know. If Hatch allows input & export “FCM” Brother Scan N Cut file format. Embrilliance allows FCM format, but I really like what I see with Hatch and would purchase it if they support FCM format.
My impression is: If one compares the full versions and the price points Embrilliance gives you the most bang for the buck. I haven't found any function I need which other softwares have and Embrilliance doesn't. Okay, it doesn't come with auto-digitizing - where there is a semi-workaround with creating a .svg with inkscape and using that. It doesn't have foto to stitch - which I seldom see in the wild so I'm guessing the results are mostly mediocre.
Also a big + + + is the BX-Font creator.
Your audio commentary was so quiet I could not hear it well enough to understand. Thank you for the embroidery comparison as I am having a difficult time finding anything like this,
Which is good?