especialyy to nvidia while in my country the were selling 3080 ti for almost 1.500 euros!!!!and think tha the in the next gen a 4070 ti super with 950 euros can perform like a 3090 ti.....back in this days a 3090 ti was a myth to buy...
@@Battleneter it’s not the highest end card of the generation but yes this is still a high end card. a 2gb vram difference is not substantial whatsoever between the 10gb and 12gb 3080s either. there’s also a 3070ti, 3070, 3060ti, 3060 12gb, 3060 8gb, 3050ti (for laptops) and 3050 below it and the performance difference between the 3070ti and the 3080 is also pretty damn big so i’m not rly getting your logic here. its a high end card and so many people would be ecstatic to have it because of how good the performance is still today. once again, high end last gen vs mid range current gen. there’s no denying that
I'd rephrase it as very well. Considering games target consoles, which are RTX2070Super / RX6700 class hardware, it'll be outpacing them until the gen ends in 2027.
Getting an RTX 3080 12GB for MSRP in early 2022 with the end of scalping and the recent launch of the i7-12700K was really the best way to replace an i7-8700K GTX 1080 Ti PC of 2017. 5 year upgrade cycle too. They are both legendary combinations.
Are we forgetting the fact that we’re comparing an originally $700 high end card to a $400 midrange card today. Compare the 7700xt and the 4060ti 8gb then find what you see😂
@@hotsos8162 $50 is a huge difference when it comes to gpus, and you’re talking about buying new vs used. Sure, you can get a 3080 for $450 but again, it’ll be a used card. It’s not the same as buying a new card. So look at the comparisons all you want, there’s still many difference
Well Nvidia obviously has a better position mostly because of it's features that has limited availability. The 7700XT here has also obviously better performance per watt since it's on a newer node. Between these two though, I'd choose the Radeon regardless mostly because of the efficiency and the AV1 encoder.
Nvidia features oh the features that they limited to the 40 series and they don’t have driver side Framegen amd does which can he used in anygame and is actually really good especially latency wise its better then the games internal fg but theres a bit of blurring around crosshairs because driver side cant use ingame motion vectors
@@emanuelefusco4466 afmf 2 is good lmao the only visual shit is usually the crosshair due to it not having motion vectors afmf was alot worse and it adds very littlr latency in certain games i play its amazing but its pretty bad with crosshairs like i said yea its not perfect and probably won’t ever be perfect but its a good feature and you can use it even on old ps2 games and emulators
@@emanuelefusco4466 afmf 2 not the first one is very good only adds 6-9ms of latency the only issue i’ve seen is crosshairs and it does very very ocassionaly have a lag spike but its nothing major and definitely worth it on singeplayer titles can also use it on ps2 games to get 120fps
@@Qelyn it makes sense on emulators but I don't think Nvidia users are missing an important feature. Also afmf 2 is similar to lossless scaling but with less latency so they could use that, I wouldn't use both afmf 2 and lossless scaling personally.
You look in the wrong place, look at that 0.1%, that's where the micro stutters happen, it affects stable fluidity. Also, look at VRAM usage, 3080 is starving@@AGENTEN-ry6lr
@@AGENTEN-ry6lrby a slight margin which also could be down to margin of error you can test the 7700 XT 3 times and get 5% different each time its called margin of error but yea the 3070 Ti and 7700 XT are closer comparison the 7700 XT beats it by a slight bit just like the 3080 beats the 7700 XT by a slight bit
In this comment section I smells of stupidity. These are two different price classes. Yes the 3080 is faster but it's more expensive and uses a lot more power and you'll notice that (certainly if you are from europe). So I'll call it a draw. Anyone who thinks different fine. If you chose to only buy from one or the other. It's your loss when you realize that you've bought a piece of junk when you are out of vram in two years or have terrible upscaling.
@@lc756 True, but it does have 2gb less of vram and it's price is more like that of a 7900GRE. And most of those feautures are software and I pay for a product that's hardware. On linux you can fool around as much with software as you want limiting the benefits of Nvidia. And the 7700 XT has ai encoders just like the 3080 so it wouldn't be to hard to see AMD someday release an fsr option for RDNA3+ cards that actually use AI encoding. (Response to you 2nd comment: Which should you chose) Neither, the 3080 is objectively worse than the 4070 (super) and the 7700 XT has the 7800 XT on it's heals. This is basically the question: AMD or Nvidia with the normal response of: If you want't Vram/Real performance: AMD but if you like RT and wan't to use upscaling: Nvidia. But I must say that if price wasn't a consideration I would get the 3080. Not because I'm gonna use it (I have a 7800 XT (upgraded from 3070) and I have a laptop 3060) but just to look at the legendary 3080. And put it on a shelf
7700XT better choice unless you really need CUDA or you plan to record videos with the nvidia encoder, otherwise the 7700XT is better for raw gaming. look at the power draw!
ya when compared to 4 years old 3080... if u compare to 1 year old 4070 it's actually less efficient and worse for not having DLSS and mediocre RT. the thing is that over time more and more games will be like avatar that use RT at all presets.
I really wanted to go with Radeon this time because I had an RTX 3070 in the past, and now I have a Ryzen cpu. However it still looks like Nvidia beats Radeon price to performance ratio. A used GTX 3080 can be found for $450cad, and a new 7700XT is about ~$600 tax included. Considering the fact that Nvidia performs better, and 7700XT is more expensive, it's really not worth it at all. REALLY unfortunate, as I wanted to have an amd gpu this time... But oh well... Back to Nvidia I guess... :/
you’re comparing new to used, should be used to used as you can find a used 6800 or even xt for under 450, around 300 is what i saw in fb marketplace in canada. 7700 xt used is around 400.
@@tho1133 After thorough research Radeon's FSR is quite awful and DLSS is way more advanced both visually and performance wise. With all these high demanding games running upscaling will be 100% necessary so Radeon is definitely a no go for me now. Bad option with how their FSR 3.1 looks/performs compared to RTX. There's no comparison to it.
@@nimkal i assume you also concluded that nvdia's lack of vram coupled with higher prices ultimately leads to amd having the upper hand? DLSS uses a lot of vram to function, as well as frame gen as well. what would be the point in a "better performing" card if it just runs out of vram in the near future which leads to you having to upgrade sooner than normal? I personally switched from a 4070 ti to the 7900 xtx simply due to the 12gb vs 24gb difference, I managed to grab the xtx at 999 cad. Also, the new series should integrate AI fsr which should help their upscaling. this should be way better than fsr 3, as seen in the ps5 pro's significantly better performance in RT as well.
@@tho1133 "DLSS uses a lot of vram to function" my man, do you know how dlss works? I'll help u out buddy, dlss makes the game render at a lower resolution and uses ai to enhance image as an higher resolution so basically you are not using "more vram" on the contrary, u are reducing vram usage when upscaling and this process uses much less vram than what is saves you.
Everyone forgetting about 0.1% and 1% lows. I’ve compared both of these cards on my machine and find the 7700 XT performing better on average. This comparison seems a little strange, especially considering it’s last gen high end and this gen mid.
With games that dont use much vram the 3080 will probably perform better, but anything that uses a lot the 7700xt is better, which is something we will see more often with newer games, and uses less power
must be a surprise to the comment section that a gpu that is 3 years newer, has better energy effiency than the 2020 one, that was built in samsung 8nm
It is because power efficiency isn't AMD gpu's schtick. Compare this to a similar numbering like 3070 vs rx 7700xt it'll automatically lose in power efficiency. Even the rx 7600 loses at 3060 power efficiency.
@@paulolego2888 it gives same results on these settings on native resolution(without dlss) games Alan wake 2 ,starfield and gray zone warfare 60fps on 1080p high and 1440p medium.Yeah games are trash in terms of optimization nowadays.
@@greatexpectation6456 I played Dragons Dogma 2 fine at 4k but with DLSS quality mode. I still got cpu bottlenecked in towns with a 7800x3d weirdly but otherwise it kept 60 fps just fine.
It is a shame for Nvidia to put only 10gb to a card that used to cost $700. It should have been at least 12gb. Other than that, this card is still great today😊.
Yeah its between a 3070 Ti and 3080 slightly worse then the 4070 aswell the 5060 will probably be the same performance for £349 but with lower power consumption
@neexxxt I know it very well, people who ain't got no info prefers nvidia over AMD but in fact my 6700xt is all better than this 3080. Nvidia marketin' bullshittin' nothin' else.
Forza Horizon 5 has Ray Tracing enabled but is not labled as RT like Cyber Punk. The Avatar results are trash, since you have Nvidia DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) enabled. Not sure if there is an option for FSR in that game, but these FPS numbers are for sure not comparable. Resident Evil 4 is also tested with Ray Tracing turned on, but not labled as Resident Evil 4 RT. On one hand, good that you show the settings, so I can check. Bad on the other side, since I feel justified not trusting these random benchmark YT Channels. Atleast most of the time upscaling is turned off which is how I would play, but I would also play without motion blur, depth of field and especially without TAA (absolute blurry trash).
As it has more VRam, the game engine allocates more stuff (not that it is actually using that VRam at the moment, it´s just allocated, thats how Afterburner works). Also the difference in architecture, memory bandwidth (320 bits bus-760gb/s gddr6x for the 3080 versus 192 bits-432gb/s gddr6 for the 7700xt). Theres lots of factors involved, i wouldnt assume different settings right on the bat.
the 3080 is still a great card for 1440p, sad it only had 10gb, should've been ONLY 12gb for the 3080 as its just such a powerful gpu, 3070 should've had 8gb, 3070ti 10gb as 3070ti is also WAAAAY to powerful to have only 8gb. yes the 3080 can still remain decently well for the coming 1-2 years but man its starting to creep up slowly.... sad to see. great gpus overall.
@@CloudmasterGamingIm used to overspending. Also the card arrived with fans doing a brushing noise. Theres no way I can wait months for RMA. Just have to stick with it for 2 years until its time to upgrade again
@@apotato5563 3080 support DLSS 3.7 for resolution scale and ray reconstruction it only miss the DLSS 3 frame gen and honestly i have tried frame gen on many games and it's just useless BS, in every single time i prefer responsive 60ish FPS over 120 FPS FG with higher response time. the only reason i took 4070TI over 3080TI at the time is the heat since i use ITX case
@@zzanuda_ смысла особого нет от 5700х3д. При наличии 7500ф. 7500ф и быстрее чем 5700х3д, и ам5 более перспективная платформа. 5700х3д был бы хорошо, выйди он 2 года назад. Лучше всего сливать ам4 пока она хоть как-то в цене. Пример с ам3 не буду приводить, так как он уж очень старый, но вот 1700 Интел ему 2.5 года. И кому сейчас нужен 1200 сокет? Который 3 года назад был топ? Никому. Вот так же и с ам4 будет. Ам5 уже 1.5 года. Как только выходят райзен 9000(процы на 6-8 ядер с 3д кеш). 7000 линейка мгновенно теряет 35% цены. А кому будут нужны ам4, когда 7500ф будет стоить 10к(кстати полгода назад он уже стоил 11.9к)? Весь мусор ам4 будет лежать в лотках "все по 10". Поэтому сейчас самое верное обновляться на ам5. И брать себе или 7500ф с прицелом замены на 9500ф ну или на 9800х3д. Ам4 уже труп, дайте ей умереть спокойно.
Сравни частоту видеочипа, возможно поэтому производительность меньше Ещё мб недогруз, так как память и проц в стоке. Озу разгони, затюнь тайминги. Пбо у процессора включи, или разгони множителем вручную, гайдов полно У самого Ryzen 5600, 16х2 3733 CL16 с затюнеными таймингами. в QHD 3080 нагружает отлично.
What's wrong with the people here in the comments? The 3080 draws a really considerable amount of power more, runs hotter and costs more, only for a rather small advantage. I recently went with Nvidia too, but only because I picked up a 3070ti laptop for 700 Eur. Usually in most price brakets, AMD wins over Nvidia. At least, that's my opinion
this comment section is garbage, half of people would say that AMD is better even if you compare a 6600xt to a 3090, just because they hate Nvidia. the other half would say nvidia is alwyas better just because they never tried AMD. Stop being a fanboy
Infelizmente estamos andando em torno de números, mas eu vejo a AMD como ganhadora, já tive uma RTX 3080 e sei do poder dela. Mas a RX 7700XT tem vantagem em temperatura, potencia energética 100w a menos e também tem o 1% low mais estável, eu iria de AMD.
Now, if it actually WAS $450 then honestly I'd be team green. But its more or less $500 and the 7700XT is going on sale for $380-$370 so, nvidia is still being greedy And as always, AMD > Nvidia.
@@-Rizecek- same could be said for the so called 4060 ti, which is 500 dollars which performs worse than a 3060 ti and 4070. , while 7800XT stomps both of them with much much lower price. LOL ngreedia much?
@@lc756 To say that you clearly not knowing much about hardware, AMD are better in rasterisation than Nvidia, what make Nvidia having better fps it's because they have DLSS and Frame Generation, other than that AMD are better for the price. Between a 4070, 4070 Super and a RX 7800 XT i choose the AMD card cuz more vram for about same performance. I dont play with Ray Tracing and Nvidia are too overpriced
I got a EVGA FTW RTX 3080 for msrp, but I had to wait 10 months. The card in the video is not drawing its full 320 watts. My card will draw 360 watts and would smoke both these cards.
In my Europe new 3080's go for 680 euro's while 7700 XT's go for 430. It's a completely different price class. And the 3080 uses over 100Watts more. Altough I wouldn't recommend either because of their 10/12GB frame buffer
Are you talking from experience or from feelings? As some one who has a radeon and an Nvidia I must say that I like both. (Although I do prefer the 16GB on my AMD vs 6GB on my Nvidia) (7800 xt in desktop and 3060 in laptop) Yeah sure different performance class but looking on product quality and performance their both solid options. (And don't try to say it's unfair to compare those two gpu's. Because we aren't. We are comparing the manufactuer)
Nvidia fanboy that never had a amd card! Rdna2 and 3 are vrry good arch, i had both brands and both has their string and weaks, but amd is a good price perf card
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Games :
The Last of Us Part I - 0:06
Forza Horizon 5 - 1:11 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 2:17 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077
CYBERPUNK 2077 RT - 3:17 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora - 4:11
Horizon Forbidden West - 5:12
Alan Wake 2 - 6:12
Hogwarts Legacy - 7:11 - gvo.deals/TG3HogwartsLegacy
Resident Evil 4 - 8:09
Hogwarts Legacy - 9:03 - gvo.deals/TG3HogwartsLegacy
Starfield - 9:58
System:
Windows 11
Ryzen 7 7800X3D - bit.ly/43e3VxW
MSI MPG X670E CARBON
G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 - bit.ly/3XlBGdU
CPU Cooler - be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 - bit.ly/35G5atV
GeForce RTX 3080 10GB - bit.ly/3hUikXp
RADEON RX 7700 XT 12GB - bit.ly/3ZfgFmr
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
I stil remember when the 3080 launch (it's sad to see ampere & rdna 2 GPU msrp are myths)😢. Scalpers & miners really ruined that generation of GPU.
especialyy to nvidia while in my country the were selling 3080 ti for almost 1.500 euros!!!!and think tha the in the next gen a 4070 ti super with 950 euros can perform like a 3090 ti.....back in this days a 3090 ti was a myth to buy...
it got to the point that single moms were buying Graphics Cards for mining
For about the first 4 weeks you could get them around MSRP, but a GPU mining boom at the time quickly killed that.
High end last generation vs Mid range current generation
perfectly said
Underrated comment
There is a 3080 12GB, 3080TI, 3090, and 3090 TI above this 3080 10GB. So its not exactly the Highest ampere card :p.
@@Battleneter it’s not the highest end card of the generation but yes this is still a high end card. a 2gb vram difference is not substantial whatsoever between the 10gb and 12gb 3080s either. there’s also a 3070ti, 3070, 3060ti, 3060 12gb, 3060 8gb, 3050ti (for laptops) and 3050 below it and the performance difference between the 3070ti and the 3080 is also pretty damn big so i’m not rly getting your logic here. its a high end card and so many people would be ecstatic to have it because of how good the performance is still today. once again, high end last gen vs mid range current gen. there’s no denying that
@sivaxi5114 what is ur point btw
RTX 3080 came out in 2020 and still holding up pretty well today.
I'd rephrase it as very well. Considering games target consoles, which are RTX2070Super / RX6700 class hardware, it'll be outpacing them until the gen ends in 2027.
Look at all the micro stutters in Last of Us. Clearly the AMD cards are better for gaming
@@Ladiozпрохожу эту игру как раз сейчас, ни одного фриза на 3080. Есть стрим записи на канале
@@Ladioz thats not "stutter" mate, its not perceptible, you need to understand what you are looking at.
@@Battleneter Look at the Low 1% and 0.1%. It will answer you. The game is smoother on AMD
Getting an RTX 3080 12GB for MSRP in early 2022 with the end of scalping and the recent launch of the i7-12700K was really the best way to replace an i7-8700K GTX 1080 Ti PC of 2017. 5 year upgrade cycle too. They are both legendary combinations.
Are we forgetting the fact that we’re comparing an originally $700 high end card to a $400 midrange card today. Compare the 7700xt and the 4060ti 8gb then find what you see😂
No, we are comparing a card that's $400 vs a card you can get for $450 which is a very legit comparison and I was searching for it.
@@hotsos8162 yeah used vs new. still not the same
@@hotsos8162 rtx 3080 launched at high price
@@hotsos8162 $50 is a huge difference when it comes to gpus, and you’re talking about buying new vs used. Sure, you can get a 3080 for $450 but again, it’ll be a used card. It’s not the same as buying a new card. So look at the comparisons all you want, there’s still many difference
@@hotsos8162 Yeah referb, non referb 3080 are still $600+
Why are the ram speeds different?
Rather strange but it wouldn’t make any difference maybe 1-2fps but its gpu bound anyways so wouldn’t make much difference
GPU wars look like console wars
its actually almost worse lol
Way worse
Tooo worse
You forgot cpu war
Well
Nvidia obviously has a better position mostly because of it's features that has limited availability.
The 7700XT here has also obviously better performance per watt since it's on a newer node.
Between these two though, I'd choose the Radeon regardless mostly because of the efficiency and the AV1 encoder.
Nvidia features oh the features that they limited to the 40 series and they don’t have driver side Framegen amd does which can he used in anygame and is actually really good especially latency wise its better then the games internal fg but theres a bit of blurring around crosshairs because driver side cant use ingame motion vectors
@@Qelyn stop defending that shit, afmf is full of microlags and has shit visual quality, I've tested it but I usually disable it.
@@emanuelefusco4466 afmf 2 is good lmao the only visual shit is usually the crosshair due to it not having motion vectors afmf was alot worse and it adds very littlr latency in certain games i play its amazing but its pretty bad with crosshairs like i said yea its not perfect and probably won’t ever be perfect but its a good feature and you can use it even on old ps2 games and emulators
@@emanuelefusco4466 afmf 2 not the first one is very good only adds 6-9ms of latency the only issue i’ve seen is crosshairs and it does very very ocassionaly have a lag spike but its nothing major and definitely worth it on singeplayer titles can also use it on ps2 games to get 120fps
@@Qelyn it makes sense on emulators but I don't think Nvidia users are missing an important feature. Also afmf 2 is similar to lossless scaling but with less latency so they could use that, I wouldn't use both afmf 2 and lossless scaling personally.
Здравствуйте. Почему разная частота оперативной памяти? Я так понимаю материнская плата и процессор один
Speak english on that channel.
@@pawlik199Shut up on that channel
Might’ve tested them on seperate videos then later added them side by side bit strange but wouldn’t make a big difference anyway if any
7700XT is more stable when it comes to fluidity, those lows are pretty high, 2GB VRAM is a plus. Raster power is the key.
lol stop it, the 3080 absolutely beats it on all fronts.
You look in the wrong place, look at that 0.1%, that's where the micro stutters happen, it affects stable fluidity. Also, look at VRAM usage, 3080 is starving@@AGENTEN-ry6lr
Like they said, the 1% lows are more consistent @@AGENTEN-ry6lr
@@AGENTEN-ry6lrby a slight margin which also could be down to margin of error you can test the 7700 XT 3 times and get 5% different each time its called margin of error but yea the 3070 Ti and 7700 XT are closer comparison the 7700 XT beats it by a slight bit just like the 3080 beats the 7700 XT by a slight bit
In this comment section I smells of stupidity.
These are two different price classes. Yes the 3080 is faster but it's more expensive and uses a lot more power and you'll notice that (certainly if you are from europe). So I'll call it a draw.
Anyone who thinks different fine. If you chose to only buy from one or the other. It's your loss when you realize that you've bought a piece of junk when you are out of vram in two years or have terrible upscaling.
How ? Nvidia has more features ddls ray tracing and image upscaling
Who you should choose AMD or Nvidia?
Amd@@lc756
@@flamingophoneWhy Nvidia better than amd
@@lc756 True, but it does have 2gb less of vram and it's price is more like that of a 7900GRE. And most of those feautures are software and I pay for a product that's hardware. On linux you can fool around as much with software as you want limiting the benefits of Nvidia. And the 7700 XT has ai encoders just like the 3080 so it wouldn't be to hard to see AMD someday release an fsr option for RDNA3+ cards that actually use AI encoding.
(Response to you 2nd comment: Which should you chose)
Neither, the 3080 is objectively worse than the 4070 (super) and the 7700 XT has the 7800 XT on it's heals.
This is basically the question: AMD or Nvidia with the normal response of: If you want't Vram/Real performance: AMD but if you like RT and wan't to use upscaling: Nvidia.
But I must say that if price wasn't a consideration I would get the 3080. Not because I'm gonna use it (I have a 7800 XT (upgraded from 3070) and I have a laptop 3060) but just to look at the legendary 3080. And put it on a shelf
Здравствуйте а какой версий драйвер нвидиа стоит на 3080 ?
Speak english on that channel.
@@pawlik199 Hello, what version of nvidia driver is on the 3080?
the rtx 3080 will beat the rx 7700 xt< i noticed that ur ram isnt 6400mhz on the nvidia side and that could help with the rx 7700 xt.
7700XT better choice unless you really need CUDA or you plan to record videos with the nvidia encoder, otherwise the 7700XT is better for raw gaming. look at the power draw!
ya when compared to 4 years old 3080...
if u compare to 1 year old 4070 it's actually less efficient and worse for not having DLSS and mediocre RT.
the thing is that over time more and more games will be like avatar that use RT at all presets.
@@gametime4316 That would be a problem as AAA nowadays seems to always release unoptimized
@@gametime4316 Look at the prices in other places my G
The 7700Xt has AV1 encoding capability, which Ampere does not.
@gametime4316 tbh DLSS is fucking trash
with equal productivity, rx 7700 хt consumes less watts and is cheaper
I really wanted to go with Radeon this time because I had an RTX 3070 in the past, and now I have a Ryzen cpu.
However it still looks like Nvidia beats Radeon price to performance ratio. A used GTX 3080 can be found for $450cad, and a new 7700XT is about ~$600 tax included. Considering the fact that Nvidia performs better, and 7700XT is more expensive, it's really not worth it at all.
REALLY unfortunate, as I wanted to have an amd gpu this time... But oh well... Back to Nvidia I guess... :/
you’re comparing new to used, should be used to used as you can find a used 6800 or even xt for under 450, around 300 is what i saw in fb marketplace in canada. 7700 xt used is around 400.
@@tho1133 After thorough research Radeon's FSR is quite awful and DLSS is way more advanced both visually and performance wise. With all these high demanding games running upscaling will be 100% necessary so Radeon is definitely a no go for me now. Bad option with how their FSR 3.1 looks/performs compared to RTX. There's no comparison to it.
@@nimkal i assume you also concluded that nvdia's lack of vram coupled with higher prices ultimately leads to amd having the upper hand? DLSS uses a lot of vram to function, as well as frame gen as well. what would be the point in a "better performing" card if it just runs out of vram in the near future which leads to you having to upgrade sooner than normal? I personally switched from a 4070 ti to the 7900 xtx simply due to the 12gb vs 24gb difference, I managed to grab the xtx at 999 cad. Also, the new series should integrate AI fsr which should help their upscaling. this should be way better than fsr 3, as seen in the ps5 pro's significantly better performance in RT as well.
I have a 7700xt system and it’s fkn amazing don’t let these vids fool you I’ve never had ANY issues with it at lo
@@tho1133 "DLSS uses a lot of vram to function" my man, do you know how dlss works? I'll help u out buddy, dlss makes the game render at a lower resolution and uses ai to enhance image as an higher resolution so basically you are not using "more vram" on the contrary, u are reducing vram usage when upscaling and this process uses much less vram than what is saves you.
Everyone forgetting about 0.1% and 1% lows. I’ve compared both of these cards on my machine and find the 7700 XT performing better on average.
This comparison seems a little strange, especially considering it’s last gen high end and this gen mid.
With games that dont use much vram the 3080 will probably perform better, but anything that uses a lot the 7700xt is better, which is something we will see more often with newer games, and uses less power
must be a surprise to the comment section that a gpu that is 3 years newer, has better energy effiency than the 2020 one, that was built in samsung 8nm
It is because power efficiency isn't AMD gpu's schtick. Compare this to a similar numbering like 3070 vs rx 7700xt it'll automatically lose in power efficiency. Even the rx 7600 loses at 3060 power efficiency.
so should i buy a used 3080 instead of the 7700xt if both is for 400 dollraes?
get an 3080 12 gig used depends on your country
My 3080 is almost 4 years old already, got it for 699 MSRP on launch. still runs like a dream but i wonder how long the 10 gig buffer will hold out.
Its a decent graphics card for 1080p high and 1440p medium 60fps in all games at these settings.
@@greatexpectation6456 ur crazy
@@paulolego2888 check Alan wake 2,starfield and forpespoken games benchmark on on these settings on native resolution (without dlss) same results .
@@paulolego2888 it gives same results on these settings on native resolution(without dlss) games Alan wake 2 ,starfield and gray zone warfare 60fps on 1080p high and 1440p medium.Yeah games are trash in terms of optimization nowadays.
@@greatexpectation6456 I played Dragons Dogma 2 fine at 4k but with DLSS quality mode. I still got cpu bottlenecked in towns with a 7800x3d weirdly but otherwise it kept 60 fps just fine.
Owners of RTX 3080 can sleep calm if don't need 4K@60. Still very decent GPU for 1440p and RT with DLSS.
It is a shame for Nvidia to put only 10gb to a card that used to cost $700. It should have been at least 12gb. Other than that, this card is still great today😊.
Why does the 7700xt footage show higher ram speed? 6400mt/s vs 6000mt/s
yo someone else who noiced it too, it could help the rx 7700 xt
So its basically like a 3070 ti now? At launch without drivers it was equivalent to a 3070 no?
yeah its >= 2080 ti and 3070 ti. Maybe it will be = to a rtx 5050 or rtx 5060
Yeah its between a 3070 Ti and 3080 slightly worse then the 4070 aswell the 5060 will probably be the same performance for £349 but with lower power consumption
7700XT is WAY more power efficient and has much better 1% lows. Sure it's 5-10% "slower" but it's decisively the better card in 2024.
Consumin' 100+ more watts than Amd still deliverin' lowers fps thab Amd, 😅
Man how can 1 individual be as dumb as you. its just insane
@neexxxt I know it very well, people who ain't got no info prefers nvidia over AMD but in fact my 6700xt is all better than this 3080.
Nvidia marketin' bullshittin' nothin' else.
@@Ashfaq7273AMD GPUs bug drivers?😂 🤡
@neexxxt😂😂😂 AMD bug drivers gpu
@@Ashfaq7273AMD GPUs 😂😂😂
Forza Horizon 5 has Ray Tracing enabled but is not labled as RT like Cyber Punk.
The Avatar results are trash, since you have Nvidia DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) enabled. Not sure if there is an option for FSR in that game, but these FPS numbers are for sure not comparable.
Resident Evil 4 is also tested with Ray Tracing turned on, but not labled as Resident Evil 4 RT.
On one hand, good that you show the settings, so I can check. Bad on the other side, since I feel justified not trusting these random benchmark YT Channels. Atleast most of the time upscaling is turned off which is how I would play, but I would also play without motion blur, depth of field and especially without TAA (absolute blurry trash).
why are u using different settings in rx7700xt u can clearly see difference in vram consumption
As it has more VRam, the game engine allocates more stuff (not that it is actually using that VRam at the moment, it´s just allocated, thats how Afterburner works). Also the difference in architecture, memory bandwidth (320 bits bus-760gb/s gddr6x for the 3080 versus 192 bits-432gb/s gddr6 for the 7700xt). Theres lots of factors involved, i wouldnt assume different settings right on the bat.
@@kramersigil7436 ok
Last of us the 3080 ran out vram 😅😅😅 10gb sucks
the 3080 is still a great card for 1440p, sad it only had 10gb, should've been ONLY 12gb for the 3080 as its just such a powerful gpu, 3070 should've had 8gb, 3070ti 10gb as 3070ti is also WAAAAY to powerful to have only 8gb.
yes the 3080 can still remain decently well for the coming 1-2 years but man its starting to creep up slowly.... sad to see. great gpus overall.
I love my RX 7700 XT. I bought it on release date! Around 450 euros
You should of waited 2-3 weeks imo, it's gone down to £400 but still one of my fav cards
@@CloudmasterGamingIm used to overspending. Also the card arrived with fans doing a brushing noise. Theres no way I can wait months for RMA. Just have to stick with it for 2 years until its time to upgrade again
3080 has a sweet advantage with DLSS
Although it is the older DLSS2. So just get a 4070 if you want an Nvidia card
@@apotato5563 4070 super is super close in price so just get that
@@apotato5563 3080 support DLSS 3.7 for resolution scale and ray reconstruction
it only miss the DLSS 3 frame gen and honestly i have tried frame gen on many games and it's just useless BS, in every single time i prefer responsive 60ish FPS over 120 FPS FG with higher response time.
the only reason i took 4070TI over 3080TI at the time is the heat since i use ITX case
@@gametime4316 4070 ti is just better in everything
@@zackfair8407 ya and nvidia charge for every bit of that betterness ^^
the amd kinda have better lows and watt usage
У меня тоже 3080 , но производительность чуть меньше, возможно из за процессора 5 5600.
поставил к своей 3080ti в пару 5700x3d, можешь смело обновляться, полный кайф за 16к деревянных
@@zzanuda_ да я вот не знаю, будит ли смысл в 2к, в 1080 по-любому прирост будет
@@zzanuda_ смысла особого нет от 5700х3д. При наличии 7500ф. 7500ф и быстрее чем 5700х3д, и ам5 более перспективная платформа. 5700х3д был бы хорошо, выйди он 2 года назад. Лучше всего сливать ам4 пока она хоть как-то в цене. Пример с ам3 не буду приводить, так как он уж очень старый, но вот 1700 Интел ему 2.5 года. И кому сейчас нужен 1200 сокет? Который 3 года назад был топ? Никому. Вот так же и с ам4 будет. Ам5 уже 1.5 года. Как только выходят райзен 9000(процы на 6-8 ядер с 3д кеш). 7000 линейка мгновенно теряет 35% цены. А кому будут нужны ам4, когда 7500ф будет стоить 10к(кстати полгода назад он уже стоил 11.9к)? Весь мусор ам4 будет лежать в лотках "все по 10". Поэтому сейчас самое верное обновляться на ам5. И брать себе или 7500ф с прицелом замены на 9500ф ну или на 9800х3д. Ам4 уже труп, дайте ей умереть спокойно.
Сравни частоту видеочипа, возможно поэтому производительность меньше
Ещё мб недогруз, так как память и проц в стоке.
Озу разгони, затюнь тайминги. Пбо у процессора включи, или разгони множителем вручную, гайдов полно
У самого Ryzen 5600, 16х2 3733 CL16 с затюнеными таймингами. в QHD 3080 нагружает отлично.
@@youtubearemorons1 не гонюсь за тем, чтоб продать что то и постараюсь юзать по максимуму платформу, на которой давно сижу
Fortunately got my 3080 for 350$ 👍👍
Nice steal, I got my rx 7700xt for $320
Remember guys the power consumption is like 100w more than it
I got 7700xt and I'm so proud
What's wrong with the people here in the comments? The 3080 draws a really considerable amount of power more, runs hotter and costs more, only for a rather small advantage.
I recently went with Nvidia too, but only because I picked up a 3070ti laptop for 700 Eur. Usually in most price brakets, AMD wins over Nvidia. At least, that's my opinion
Bro amd GPUs are bad ray tracing 😂😂😂 you use path tracing?
@@lc756 who da fk use ray tracing everyday?
@@lc756 ppl really care abaout ray tracing?
@@ICRA7EDyes I do
@@lc756Oof. My condolences
bro 7700xt pulling 200w while 3080 be pulling 320 💀
this comment section is garbage, half of people would say that AMD is better even if you compare a 6600xt to a 3090, just because they hate Nvidia. the other half would say nvidia is alwyas better just because they never tried AMD.
Stop being a fanboy
7700xt買うけど、ここにいる人達はなぜ3080を推してるのかがわからん。7800xtのほうがコスパ的にも断然上なんよな
Infelizmente estamos andando em torno de números, mas eu vejo a AMD como ganhadora, já tive uma RTX 3080 e sei do poder dela. Mas a RX 7700XT tem vantagem em temperatura, potencia energética 100w a menos e também tem o 1% low mais estável, eu iria de AMD.
Got a 7700xt for $330 vs. a 3080 at $405... It's not worth it to go nvidia if going used for both.
can you do 14900k Baseline vs no Baseline Profil?? new Bios. and 13900 K 2 :D
Please make 7800XT/ 7900GRE vs RTX 3080 in 1440P
3080 is comparable to 7800xt in 1440p, but still performs better in most games at 4k. The 7900gre performs a little better than 3080 overall.
@@ESKATEUKi thought the 7800xt performed better, the 16gb really gives it a lead
@@ESKATEUKand the 7900gre is basically a 3090 no?
@@ESKATEUKsource : techspot and techpowerup
@@Luh_Iphone yeah in some games but in others 3090 still performs a bit better
King 3080 Ti
😎😎Meine GPU monster🥰🥰
In my country you can get a new 7700xt for 100 dollars more than a second hand 3080 so new one it is🤣
The best and king RTX 3080 😍😍😍😍
king of wasted power consumption
My 3080ftw3 still alive😊
RTX 3080 TI here and its amazing
The old Gen is better than new Gen !!!
o certo seria rx 6800xt vs 3080 😊 the right one would be rx 6800xt vs 3080
This doesn't include frame gen?
Dang 7700xt is much cooler and alot less watts than 3080.
Rip 40 series 😢
Power comsumption RTX 3080💀
Mistaken Hogwarts Legacy for Flight Simulator
7700 xt vs 6800 non xt ???
6800 beats
RX 6800 NON XT RE_TEST 2024 RECOMINGGGGGGGGGG !!!!!!! VS 3080/4070
Now, if it actually WAS $450 then honestly I'd be team green. But its more or less $500 and the 7700XT is going on sale for $380-$370 so, nvidia is still being greedy
And as always, AMD > Nvidia.
Literally a PS5 PRO
its normal if 3080 lose..its not the same gen anyway
Tengo una 3080 comprada a precio de oro y que dure mínimo 2026
Wow 3080 only for 50$ more it's much better than 7700xt in raster and RT, it also has DLSS2
7700xt vs 6800xt
RTX does better on RT
RX 7000 y RTX 3000 tienen una potencia de RT muy similar
6800XT WIN!
Copium
Yesh it has
I have both and i prefer the 6800xt
@@IsraelSocialAMD fanboy how drivers? 😂😂😂
@@lc756 Good actually
Adrenaline is better than gforce experience lol
3080 is even better choice than 7800 can't ever get a card without dlss upscaling it's like charm truely game changer
7700xt is much better
Я 12 ))))))))))
No one asked + L ratio
Tram Nvidia all day. Keep your AMD cards in the trash.
Trashdeon GPUs 💩 🗑️ ❤😂
none buy RX6800XT
7700xt and 7800xt is big joke.
the only joke i am seeing is you
@@MrBALAKUMARA 6800xt vs 7800xt= 3-5% more power. It's a lower price, but it's a poor successor.
@@-Rizecek- same could be said for the so called 4060 ti, which is 500 dollars which performs worse than a 3060 ti and 4070. , while 7800XT stomps both of them with much much lower price. LOL ngreedia much?
@@-Rizecek-the rdna3 architecture also exists
7700 xt is better then 4060 ti and close to 4070@@MrBALAKUMARA
In other words both sucks
3080 is much better
The DLSS make a difference but without that the 7700 XT has better performance in rasterisation
It's not
Yes Nvidia>Amd
@@lc756 To say that you clearly not knowing much about hardware, AMD are better in rasterisation than Nvidia, what make Nvidia having better fps it's because they have DLSS and Frame Generation, other than that AMD are better for the price. Between a 4070, 4070 Super and a RX 7800 XT i choose the AMD card cuz more vram for about same performance.
I dont play with Ray Tracing and Nvidia are too overpriced
@@GHOSTERING Plus it draws less power
20%
20% faster 😂? AMD GPUs are so bad at ray tracing
yeah, RX 7700 is 20% worst in everything
I got a EVGA FTW RTX 3080 for msrp, but I had to wait 10 months. The card in the video is not drawing its full 320 watts. My card will draw 360 watts and would smoke both these cards.
throw ur card. too much power consumption. rtx 3000 series are failure in terms of power=fps.
imagine buying an AMD gpu
RTX 3080 wins. RX 7700 XT lose garbage
Rtx 750 ti best graphic card
This genuinely made me crack up 😂
Rtx 3080 best clears amd ever way
In my Europe new 3080's go for 680 euro's while 7700 XT's go for 430. It's a completely different price class. And the 3080 uses over 100Watts more.
Altough I wouldn't recommend either because of their 10/12GB frame buffer
yes 300 watts is an advantage
Last good High-end graphics card from nvidia
NVIDIA > AMD
Don't buy trashdeon GPUs 💩😂
Are you talking from experience or from feelings? As some one who has a radeon and an Nvidia I must say that I like both. (Although I do prefer the 16GB on my AMD vs 6GB on my Nvidia) (7800 xt in desktop and 3060 in laptop) Yeah sure different performance class but looking on product quality and performance their both solid options. (And don't try to say it's unfair to compare those two gpu's. Because we aren't. We are comparing the manufactuer)
Nvidia fanboy that never had a amd card! Rdna2 and 3 are vrry good arch, i had both brands and both has their string and weaks, but amd is a good price perf card
buy 300 watss gpu
@@IsraelSocialAMD GPUs how are good at path racing?
@@IsraelSocialNvidia has too many advantages. better support in games, dlss, rt, better in work, etc. Therefore, there is no point in taking AMD.