BREAKING NEWS: The Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments In Trump Immunity Claim In 2020 Election Case
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 апр 2024
- On Thursday, the Supreme Court heard Trump v. United States.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes.com/membership...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
![Oscar Maydon x Junior H - Volver Al Futuro [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/sa52xabMSB8/mqdefault.jpg)
Jackson, who doesn’t even claim to know what a woman is, has no business sitting on this court.
A woman is her mom!
Answer to her woke question we all know the truth.
It’s funny how the democrat in them always comes right out
What did Trump do besides getting venomous hatred from evil people who don't let up!!! Seriously?!?
he knows what's really going on. And they are scared.
He put a Yuge wrench in their plans.
Taking down the CABAL
Don’t you love how these people don’t let him get a word in or don’t allow him to give a full explanation of the law. These criminals keep interrupting him. Such a witch hunt and visible double standard. Criminals are above the law in this country. So pathetic!
@@hurricanehan6073Meanwhile the REAL Criminals get off Scott free
What a waste of SCOTUS time. No law was broken!
Never in my life I ever thought something like this would ever happen. This is freaking nuts exclamation point
Correct. I never thought I would see the day either where the taxpayers are forced to aid the Nazi’s in Ukraine either.
communists get immunity
I remember when Hillary was accused of destroying evidence of her illegal server in her basement.
How she used "Bleachbit" on her and her staff's phones, then smashed them with hammers.
And when Hillary paid for the fake document that the gov used to spy on Trump.
I asked so many people why the government wasn't taking her to court and prosecuting her for her crimes.
The answer I got was that they couldn't take her to court when she was running for office because the American people would see it as using the court system to prevent her from running for office. (Election Interference)
But they say its ok to do that to Trump because "orange man bad".
Im a democrat ..but there is no case here !. We are in very dangerous times !
I'm a republican.
I love you for being honest enough to cross the political tide.
Then you are an enemy of the state. Please change parties until yours gets a grip on reality, and stops trying to destroy our country.
Feel free to return to the Democrat Party once it regains it's sanity.
Is be embarrassed to call myself a Democrat in 2024. You are brave. Hahahhahaha
1:31:00 tell me that Alto going to push for this to be Remanded because the prosecution is so hell-bent on Trump. They failed to see that the Supreme Court is not trying to just focus on Trump, but for the future of all time.
@@mp-nl4jt🙌🏻💥
Your system cannot even Hold the sitting president accountable!!!!
Joe Biden is 1000 percent more guilty than Trump will ever be!
OR, REFUSE TO HOLD THE GUY IN OUR WHITE HOUSE, SOUNDS LIKE STINKY PELOSI, OUT TO GET PRES TRUMP IN TEOUBLE.
We the people are tired of the unfairness against Trump.
What about the prosecutorial abuse by AG’s, DOJ, FBI or DOJ?
Give it time. Do you know how many people are going to jail when Trump gets elected?
WE THE PEOPLE must slap a lawsuit on the judicial system if we can’t vote for our representatives
Noone knows how to do all that.
least not most.
We people want Biden a peach because he’s not fair to all people just him and his immigrants not all people that’s why I want President Trump for one thing he cuts. The price is down gas, food, and other things President Biden doesn’t know anything there.❤️❤️ what you are saying lady is true something evil of Joe Biden❤️❤️
🎉😂🎉🎉🎉😂🎉😢
God has given His Servants The Prophets Word, The Biden Harris AOC The Pelosi Clintons
God is The Final Judge
Questioning an election is not a crime
No, it isn't. But engaging in a conspiracy to falsify official documents is a crime. The LEGAL way to contest an election is in court, which he did and lost 60 times. The Attorney General, his own white house lawyers and a private company he hired to investigate all told him there wasn't fraud on the level to change the election. He couldn't accept losing. I don't know why his supporters find it so unbelievable that he lost. Nationally, there are more democrats than Republicans. Independents vote Democrat more often than republican AND Every republican president but ONE in the last 40 years has lost the popular vote
Trying too take one is..what have you been seeing and hearing?
@@user-fp4bv3tp5ilike the 2016 election?
You are so right!!!!!!
Correct!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
How is a judge arguing with the attorney? This is so ridiculous. These judges are supposed to be non-biased, and clearly that’s not the case
I thought that was the enemy lawyer lmfao
you should definitely not be allowed to charge one president for a crime you refused to charge another for. doing so is 100% politically motivated.
I remember hearing from Biden, and I quote, "Trump will NOT become President again. I will send MY DOJ after him."
He also said that Trump will win reelection and Trump won and he can't win
His words are all over the place. It's called word salad and it indicates mental illness
JB is vicious
@@CheerfulAzaleaFlower-vd6nh... Plagiarist in Chief.
Crooked Joe is a tyrant
I remember this also
She doesn’t even know what a woman is
Well there's a difference between a man and a woman I can tell you a woman has a split... a man do not have a split....
When it's discovered that Biden was a FAKE President everything he did as a President will be reversed. This means She will no longer be a Supreme Court Justice...
@@earlenem5745a woman is an adult human female. There's the definition
Buyden just secured his nomination ...identified as the first woman POTUS
LOL
What is the point of the impeachment process if a future executive can prosecute a former executive . Presidents should have absolute immunity unless they are impeached by congress.
3 branches
Just means it's time for Republicans to start pressing charges on the otherside.
Sotomayors questioning should frighten Obama.
Ohhh u got that right!
Should frighten Obama and Clinton's. Wow.
Sotomayor you can tell is going after Trump but trying to protect Obama
Too rich to frighten.
Ham and the others are to go to jail
When you have Democrat friends, that say (admit) this is being done to keep Trump out of office, you know how crazy this is.
Talib Rashid on television straight said "If Congress would have done their job and impeached Trump, none of this would be happening." MSM first concern is always "trial before Nov." Freudian slips are funny.
I know people who claim this is a good thing.
I'm afraid to ask my Democrat friends, I don't want to be disappointed in their answer. They hate Trump that much!
With all the "first time in history" of the past 42 months, when all else fails to prevent '24 from being the "last election" ...it will be canceled for the first time in history.
With all of the "first time in history" of the past 42 months; when all else fails to prevent '24 from being the "last selection" ...we will not have a '24 selection, canceled.
But there's no problem with judges having total immunity, right?!😮
She is not allowing the attorney to finish his sentences! Very disappointing for our constitutional rights
The thing is that he didn’t do anything wrong ……………….. y’all are just out to get him 🤬
Trump is endangering their fleecing of America while there is still something on the bones. $34trillion in debt alone!
That is not a very solid argument. At all.
@@rigelb9025not an argument, just the TRUTH. It's called Trump Derangement Syndrome.
If he is being judged by motivation should we not be looking at the motives of bringing him to trial in the first place?
...The true conspiracy to obstruct.
ce
1:19:32
Allowing mail in ballots for any federal election positions opens the flood gate to plausibility that fowl play is afoot.
Any reasonable person could assume election fraud has occurred.
Mail in ballots should be abolished in the United States.
Absolutely 💯
This woman is bent on trying Trump . She is putting something forward that is Completely Ridiculous.
If you cant explain what a women is.... I highly doubt one could tell the difference between an official act and not.
Dang you roasted her 😂
Biden has given several unconstitutional orders the only person impeached is Mayorkas
Agree
Bingo
exactly, that 'women' should Not be a judge.
We American People has rights for free speech. Have people forgotten ❓❓🤔😞
We.won''t if Biden wins ELECTION and the Biden Administration will ABOLISH THE CONSTITUTION.
THAT MEANS NO MORE FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
Repeated "Conditioning"....made people compliant and complacent.
@@ImaJWalker I'M NOT IN THAT CONDITION OF COMPLIANT & COMPLACENT ... I KNOW THAT I HAVE RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
People haven't forgotten. This is a political witch hunt. Just like the previous 2 impeachments against him.
@user-eu5mb7mk1s
Yes, they have forgotten. There is no Free Speech anymore.
I can only pray that our Supreme Court will be the one court left for we the people to be able to rely on for President Trump!!
I'm afraid for America.
He had an official responsibility to insure a fair and.accurate election.
And there's enough Americans. I believe that thought the election was stolen in some states. I believe the election was stolen in Arizona and I definitely agree with you sir. I think maybe it's time we go back and look at all the elections and we have a fair election this next time around
Biden? He hasn't in nearly 4 years
Yeah and he also knew Democrats were going to rig it... there's no justification on both side.
@jacquelineseely5393 Biden stated he will ensure there will be no more fraud in future elections. Meaning Crooked Joe stole last election
Exactly what Trump did 1/6...upholding an official election
Not like a President!!!!!! A PRESIDENT MUST BE ABLE TO MAKE A DEFENSIVE MOVE TO PROTECT US AS AMERICANS!!!!!!!
Which Biden is unable to do! He has, instead open our border to crime and diseases.
Biden left behind the military equipment in Afghanistan. I don't feel protected by his decision
No laws were broken. Therefore there is no case. Period. The President Act allowed Trump to posses those documents. Period. Do the right thing here. And dismiss the case.
God bless you President Trump,,
Is Jackson REALLY saying that all of the government follows the law? Really? When Pelosi was caught insider trader, she was not prosecuted.... and said to the press, "Those were just good business decisions." It would be good to make all of our public servants to be judged by the same laws as you are now assuming over Trump.
And when our officials were caught on audio discussing who they want running Ukraine after overthrowing it in 2014…
@AlBundy310 Right?! Trump is the only POTUS who wasn't basically demonic since Reagan!
Father God..Your will be done in the lives of everyone involved in this proceeding..
Let the lying tongues be exposed and counted against themselves..
Amen . Trump is innocent. Vote Trump 2024
Yes!
Amen to that!
AMEN!
Amen
She will never be fair! Its only balanced is her favour!!! Wtf
It wasn't for personal reasons it was for the people because we are all questioning it.
What about Biden and Hillary that did like smashing phones . Also Biden to old to be held accountable .
Take him to court then dope. You better hope Joe doesn’t have Fat Nixon offed. After all, the potus is immune.
The fix is in folks.
Trumps own defense lawyer SAID ar the 2nd impeachment trial, the potus is NOT above the law once he’s left office .
Niow he is?
Thanks alot for wrecking what really made America great for so long
BIden too old to be protected, he's too old to serve as President.
Hunter Biden and Jill Biden not too old to prosecute.
Your comment makes what these judges are saying is BS and bias. Agreed, these judges are playing with words and not acting in accordance with the law, and they know it. If this was about Biden, they would have a very different word salad to play on. Even these judges are protected under these Marx's administration.
Huh...what! If Obiden is "too old" to be held accountable, then he is too old to be running aka ruining America and The American People! TRUMP2024❤🤍💙
Agree!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Well stated, same thoughts here, and I could add an even larger, additional list to them (sure you could, too!).
If an election is questioned it would be official. Election integrity is our constitutional right in this great republic
Not when everyone in trumps white house said he LOST the election.
Plus two independent surveys trump hired said there Was no wrongdoing.
Questioning an election is fine. Conspiring to overturn a fair election to remain in power is not.
It's not about Election but whether Presidents should be immune from criminal accusations because then no President will be able to work and act without hesitation. People are not stupid and they have already chosen Trump by just listening to him as a Primary Source. People who have listened to the political propaganda and secondary sources that distort everything are totally misinformed by that fake media.
@@leecasteen Alternate electors as stated are nothing new. Delaying final election results until irregularities are properly investigated goes towards the proper running of the country and a genuine transition of power that is transparent. We waited for the hanging chads for a long while as recounts were performed IF THAT WAS GOOD FOR THE COUNTRY THEN ACTIONS TO DELAY THE FINAL VOTE UNTIL THE VARIOUS ISSUES ARE INVESTIGATED IS ALSO GOOD. iN MICHIGAN TRUCKLOADS OF BALLOTS ARRIVED AND WERE COUNTED IN A MANNER CLEARLY OUTSIDE OF THE LAW AND THE VOTE WAS VERY MUCH IN DOUBT. The only reason the Michigan results got certified is because Democrats threatened the children of the republican certifying agent. Right there the FBI should have arrested the clowns making the threats so that the agent could vote against certifying the Detroit results possibly changing the states results.
Things of a similar nature dealing with drop boxes that were not monitored were stuffed in many states. The entire election is in doubt in the eyes of 75 million people. If the vote was truly genuine then a full recount, checking each ballot and name, verifying that no dead people voted and no double and triple votes were cast and that every vote for federal office was cast by an American citizen as required by law.would remove all doubt to the election results. The results would remain exactly where it was. We all know there were significant irregularities and under scrutiny Biden would lose at least 15% and likely more votes/ The funny thing is currently Biden trails ion every poll but one. Everywhere Biden goes he finds crowds of Trump supporters and no Biden supporters. I remember that when Biden did his whistle-stop tour there was parking lot after parking lot with empty painted circles because nobody turned out to support him, just as is the situation now. Trump overfilled stadiums nationwide yet Biden won in record numbers and this only came to light at 4;30am when it was clear that Trump had won and I took a nap. All the sudden Biden wins? I wonder what switch was flipped to massage the algorithm to flip the results. Nah the election was as bogus as a 3$ bill. It needed a thorough investigation but nobody wanted to look not the Dems and not the NeoCon Republicans. I accidentally hit the caps lock and don't want to retype all of that. A neutral body could oversee the process and no changes should have been made until every stone was checked.
@@leecasteennobody conspired to over through anything
There needs to be a law that prevents appointing nit wits to the Supreme Court!
A president CANNOT be charged by any Judicial court while he is president, even for crimes he commits in their jurist diction. If he walks into a store in NYC and holds them up at gunpoint, he cannot be charged by NYC for it, but must be Impeached for it by Congress, and tried by the Senate.
That is the Constitutional design because, as they put it, the president must be free from such concerns in order to freely operate as president. (and a lot about how such things are trivial in comparison to the importance of his official duties).
If we allow them to then be charged once they leave office, the entire reason for the immunity is void.
It's like saying you are immune to prosecution for anything you do for the next 2 days.
But you can be charged for all of it once those 2 days end.
What are you going to do? Will you do Anything you would otherwise not do?
Of course not, because the THREAT is the same. The barrier is there whether it be NOW or immediately after the term ends.
And it is the same for the office of president.
If he can be charged the moment he leaves office for the things he did In Office, the reason for not allowing such prsecutions while he is still in Office doesn't apply.
Because he is STILL prevented by the threat of prosecution from taking whatever actions it was.
Whether you think a president should be allowed to break a law is irrelevant. It could be any law. Including laws we don't even know still exist. Hell, it was still legal to shoot black people and Mormons if they were in public after sunset in Kansas, until the 1990s.
There are laws still in effect that you would consider insane. Ask any police officer if they can follow someone for 2 blocks without having a reason for giving them a ticket. They'll explain it to you.
Being subject to prosecution would allow prosecution on laws most don't even know exist, and no one would think should be applied, and political parties would use the threat of applying those to any oppose candidate who wins... the moment they're out of office... to ensure no one runs against them going forward.
If the president does anything Worth charging a president, the Congress has the obligation to impeach them for it.
And let's not forget what this is about.
They're claiming that a Legal action, a legal contract between private citizens, can be made into a Criminal action by the fact that it contains nondisclosure obligations, if one of those members runs for an office.
Every Single Candidate for president has been under at least one for the past 100 years, guaranteed.
But this one, this one they charge for it?
And the bank loan -- Every Single Rentor of properties has their properties appraised for taxes at the lowest rate they can, and when they use them as collateral, as high as they can get.
NY has decided that while they have NEVER charged anyone for this before, they will suddenly decide it is case-worthy when Trump did it, and somehow expand that to multiple charges... and put it under a judge who donated to Obama, Clinton, and Biden, and his daughter runs an online group that has collected over $100MILLION to try to get Trump jailed... and a prosecutor who has repeatedly called for Trump to be jailed, on social media.... and neither that judge nor the prosecutor will recuse themselves.
-----
These idiots talkinga bout Public and Private conduct.... never read the minutes to know what the founders intended by the immunity. Or they would have no reason to even discuss this, because a President either needs to be beyond such considerations, or they don't.
and if they do, it must apply both while in and out of office (regarding things done while In office)... otherwise what is the damned point of it?
The only way they can ever be charged is if they were impeached and charged while in office. Both for criminal or civil matters.
You did nothing wrong.
Im praying for this whole situation.
Five Capital police died because Trump was born.
Jackson asks a question, gets an answer against her agenda- and then cuts off the person answering. This is a pattern that she tries to make more of headline or gotcha snippit over actually seeking an answer to her questions. More of an activist than a judge.
That’s because she was installed based on identity, not skills.
EXACTLY 💯 😢
Typical leftie tactic
What has been approved by both parties to be allowed and allow her in should also be permitted to be heard by the supreme court justices. But then, HENCE, Opens a can of worms which never burns. AKA, as that burning bush from ancient days
@@GenXBratno that is a skill. Its a devious skill, but it’s effective in trying to stop your opposition from making valid arguments. You can say she was picked bc she was black, but you can’t say she isn’t smart or skilled bc she absolutely is.
Terrible! Unbelievable! What an injustice!
What a kangaroo court🥵
"I'm having a hard time thinking" is the most appropriate phrase Brown had to say. Judges are suppored to be unbiased. Obviously, that isn't the case for her.
And listen how much more intelligent this attorney is than any of these judges put together?!?!! Our country is in such a sad complete State of affairs I can't even believe it
They all have a role, I don't think that's true at all. They ask for opinion a lot too. Why? Because talking things out with multiple people and getting outside perspective and input from someone equally as knowledgeable provides better clarity, and more opportunity to thoroughly work through the matter.
Plus, that's what judges do... listen to outside takes and make a decision based on their knowledge and all of the evidence presented... 😕
Amazing Law-fair… Truly educational.
How about if the president offers 10K National Guard to DC Mayor but she refuses due to optics?
It is completely frightening that our Republic now rests on a few questions of judges who don't even attempt to hide they have already made a biased decision. It doesn't matter what the issue, left or right, they interpret the law according to their politics. Pray for our country.
It does. If they rule correctly, the voters can decide the future. If they rule incorrectly, it will show the deep state gets to decide.
EXACTLY 💯 😢ungodly
I agree 110 percent 😊
Im afraid its too late.. I have lost faith. We have a group of people killing their own democracy and we are powerless to stop it. They have successfully gotten us to hate each other, while putting people on the bench who are shredding centuries old laws at their whim.. My guess is they will push this back to the Appeals court and if Trump wins, they will give him asbolute immunity.. If he loses, they will deny it for Biden.. so the only way out of this mess is.. well vote
1000%, Hence why we have guns, and Patriotism
Jackson’s line of questioning around 55 mins in comes across as oppositional, partial and bias. She seems out of her depth.
This prosecutor talks in circles. The fed gov. Is way too big and there is too much absolute garbage in all this legalese
What happened to “INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY”?
Who is that woman questioning? She sounds BUASED.
Biased but she is trying to twist the case
_DOJ guy_ basically insists that *it is different* when _they_ do it. Pretty pathetic if you ask me.
DOJ is in Biden's pocket
What did you expect, he is a mongrel dog
40 minutes in and this lawyer is kicking behind. Awesome. Some of these judges should be reexamined for their job. There should be term limits.
Damn, these female justices don’t let the lawyer finish his point.
President Trump is NOT GUILTY. PERIOD
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Exactly! Trump2024.
FJB and his sheeples!
EXACTLY!!!
You all right?
Which crime?
Anyone in the United States should have the right and be able to free speech say that they think the election was not correct and was stolen no matter if it's a president or a citizen
You are right. Anyone can say what they think or feel. It doesn't mean that I'm correct or you are.
@@tltfaas obviously yes. It also means a person should not be held in criminal contempt for his beliefs and what he is saying.
Trump could be 100% incorrect in his claims. Immaterial to anything at hand. The idea that you can charge a person for what they believe is completely antithetical to this country's founding values.
Well the facts say otherwise. The election has been proven to be valid , and not stolen despite so many investigations that it was completely exhausted.
You’re welcome to your opinion. If social media shuts it down then I have zero control over it. I do think that some kinds of offensive speech should be allowed except that which is directly towards a person, or group that violates race, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, religion, language, region, ethnicity, objectification, dehumanizing statements. But I think saying things like the f word, damn, the s word etc when expressing one’s emotions should be allowed. If the government is violating this in your experience then contact a lawyer.
@@adamh4594I agree.
My comment is missing.
Oh, for God's sake. It's so frustrating to hear these ridiculous contentions actually being argued over, because the whole thing should be dismissed out of hand. This is just a travesty, and no one knows it better than all the damn lawyers and judges. What a disgrace!
Then the better start looking at putting the past 3 presidents in jail also.
“ We The People” who love our country and our rights must stop sitting back for some one else to stand up and speak for us . The “ Constitution” was put in place for such times as these. “ We The People”if we want to save our country need to stand united , stand up , speak up or shut up!!
Its first three words “We The People” simply affirms that the government of the United States exists to serve its citizens.
Not its people serving the government “ PERIOD!!!!
Everyone in the village see my Trump tee shirts and hear what I think
If only they could think. Soon, I hope
He keeps getting interrupted when answering and they talk over him.I can clearly see the outcome of this.This is sad smh
Obummer and Buyden will be next if this sticks
I am asking God who is the Supreme judge to intervene in this crucial case.
Ok why? For Trump or for something else?
the supreme court is the highest court in the country ? thats how ding dong
Trump's lawyer is schooling the judges. The liberal judges are just coming up with word salads and they know it.
@@FoodNerdsBiden is going to lose his immunity and he will go through this too
@@Grizzly_Adams.think like a person with a brain......and you will survive in this world
What about 33,000 emails? Not even as a president. (Thank God)
She burnt her house down to hide evidence. The police that found even more disturbing evidence can't be here to tell what was found .
Constitutional Law is absolutely fascinating.
Who else believes appointing Ketanji was a mistake?
How many kids would still be alive in Uvalde if the teacher had a gun???
These Judges should clear president Trump immediately!
Won't happen I'm afraid, he will be found guilty, and he also broke about 10 gag orders, and they're debating how to deal with it,
but you won't know anything about this because you all live in a vacum....
I know of a chef that was a excellent swimmer that suddenly drowned in shallow water , at a certain trillionares ex presidents home . Any follow ups ? It was no accident .
SOME actions are both for personal gain AND for the country's gain! The two are NOT mutually exclusive!😮
I guess there needs to be change in the TITLE, "TRUMP v. DOJ", I'm pretty sure the PEOPLE would NOT HAVE ANY PART OF THIS TRIAL.
Congress and the Senate try a President not the Supreme Court and a DA.
This whole thing makes me 🤢🤢🤮.
So the police have blanket immunity, but not the president ?
One party cannot appoint a special prosecutor to persecute the leading candidate from another party! A 'special prosecutor' must be appointed in 'bipartizan' fashion; Congress creates the (temporary) office, president nominates, and Senate approves of it before 'special prosecutor' can start the investigation! All those steps were omitted in case against Trump. Furthermore, Jack Smith wasn't active 'US Attorney' that statute requires; he was basically private citizen when Biden's AG apointed him for the role of a 'special prosecutor'! The whole case was botched from the very start!
Funny how they talk about dependable DAs and prosecutors who will not be politically motivated and yet by the questions raised the. Supreme Court seems to be divided politically!
How can these people be a judge with out knowing history of their country? This is unreal!!!!!!
Are you baffled by the conservative justices are going so hard on this questioning.
This does not bode well at all.
By pulling a Fire Alarm when voting on the Floor. Wow! He didn't do anything!!!!!
Exactly, it is complete BS that Jamal Bowman was caught pulling a fire alarm then lies about this. makes up some BS story that he thought it was an exit handle. What a Jack A s s. He received no punishment. No accountability.
It sound like they are talking about Biden! Lol. THESE PEOPLE ARE SICK &
its the opposite effect anything they charged Mr. president Trump with there doing its obvious
Just left a public comment at Scanlons DC office. I was polite but questioned her belittling actions and was hung up on.
Lord we pray you intervene for righteousness !!!
TRUMP
May God bless you and protect you.
THE PEOPLE NEED YOU TO HELP THEM
⚖️⚖️🙏🙏⚖️⚖️🙏🙏⚖️⚖️🙏🙏
🤣🤣🤣🤣
We need to help Trump so he can help us.
@@cryptoqueen7055 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
❤ in Jesus name oh Lord amen ❤🙏❤️
🍑🥴🤪🤪
I think the lawyers presented this case all wrong. Instead of asking or questioning immunity for ALL official acts, he should just brought in if President Trump instigated a riot in the Capitol. What I am trying to say is that Jan 6, Trump was asking for an election recount and to march PEACEFULLY to request it from Congress which is his right under the Constitution. What happened after that was a separate incident instigated by agitators and implants within the people that were protesting the election results, that way the lawyer would had avoided a bunch of ""IF" scenarios
the government lawyer is claiming that government workers at every level everywhere are perfect people that do no wrong so they should have immunity from Presidential scrutiny into their insider election fraud
It's not about that Jan 6. President Trump is forced to attend the trial in NY and prevented from organizing his rallies. He is in the race to be president again and the SUPREME COURT has intervened because they say that Presidents should be immune of prosecution for what they have done during their years in office. The Left, the opposition has used and misused all the possible lies to remove him from office and treat his claim there was an Election fraud in 2020 as an attack, when it's the other way around. The matter of Jan 6 has already gone through all the legal action, and just yesterday it was announced that the people who were condemned to 20 years in prison will be freed. I don't know the details. Trump is in a trial in NY but has done nothing wrong. The accusation is about an estimate he gave for the value of a property but the bank was in agreement and the loan was repaid early. Trump's opponents are just trying to obstruct his activities to run for office. It's part of their Election interference.
Yep but they also have to weigh up their decision will either implicate all past presidents or not...
It was investigated and there were multiple recounts in multiple states. Trump hired a private company to investigate and he was told by them he lost, he was told by 60 courts by HIS DOJ, his White House lawyers, even his own daughter that there wasn't enough evidence of fraud to change the outcome of the election. He entered into a criminal conspiracy to forge official documents by GOP electors, that weren't the real electors.
He whines, "unfair" "fraud" "they cheated" every time he loses ANYTHING. He claimed the Romney - Obama election was fraudulent, when he didn't win an Emmy award he said it was "rigged", when he lost the Iowa primary to Ted Cruz he cried "it was rigged". He said if he lost to Hilary Clinton it was because it was rigged and he did the same thing in 2020. He started saying there was no way he could lose 2020 unless it was rigged, months before the election. He KNEW. He refused to accept it and then he engaged in criminal acts to try to stay in office. Period. Read the indictment.
PS...they always use the "If" because their decision will be president (the interpretation of the law) and they walk through a lot of "What ifs" so they can try to avoid any unintended consequences in the future.
Someone tell this woman whoever this judges that a president does not act alone! That is why they have a cabinet
They didn't let you answer. They go back and forth like on purpose
If Pres doesn’t have ultimate power then why n the hell has bill & hillary- Obama & Biden BEEN CHARGED!
EXPLOSION OF TRUTH ⚖️
This is nuts. You can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich. Terrifying.
Mr. President Donald John Trump, Will prevail ! God will not let injustice take place, Not in Our Republic, I don't care how many times people say "democracy" ! Two things come to mind, First; In God we Trust ! Second; Our Constitutional Republic!
If this is an argument, what the heck were me and my family doing over Thanksgiving?
We need a law that states if the government prosecutes one politician for something, then they must prosecute every politician accused of the same thing regardless of party associations.
"What did you expect the end times to look like " ~ J.M. 😊❤😊❤😊
The judges are corrupt they are trying their best to twist words around, comparing apples to oranges
I hope to God that the Supreme Court Justices make the right decision for we the people 💙
Not an ice cubes chance in hell , He's bought and paid for
For Donald Trump
TRUMP. VOTE RED!!!!
Amen!!
The government lawyer is more or less arguing that the President must get approval from the OLC (Office of Legal Counsel) before making any decisions. So he's essentially arguing that the DOJ is a 4th branch of government.
this is to goofy to be in our US supreme court...fucking embarrassing
Kagan just proved she should have never been appointed (because everything she brought up is what Biden is doing now.)
I find it interesting that the Judges are asking about things Biden is already doing with the DOJ.
The Judges, the Council of 9, are being interviewed about this matter of Immunity. I think it's Kavanaugh who was asking questions....but other people were as well.
Judges, Judges, and more palms to grease, they are a dime a dozen ,all the same Graft Lies, Corruption and full of faeces , you can smell it a 44:04 44:04 44:04
Yes we are witnessing Bidens tribal
#bidenstrial
#IMPEACHBIDEN2024
#PRESIDENTTRUMP2024🇺🇲