Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

What is the Gamma Function?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 окт 2017
  • Question 7 from Tom Rocks Maths and I Love Mathematics - answering the questions sent in and voted for by YOU. This time we've got probability distributions, complex analysis and of course Pi (because it appears everywhere)... I give you the Gamma Function.
    Full playlist: • How many ping-pong bal...
    Q1: What is the probability I have the same PIN as someone else?
    Q2: How long would it take to sink to the bottom of the ocean?
    Q3: What is the gravitational field of a hollow Earth?
    Q4: What is the best way to win at the board game Monopoly?
    Q5: What are the most basic Mathematical Axioms?
    Q6: How does Modular Arithmetic work?
    Q7: What is the Gamma Function?
    Q8: How many ping-pong balls would it take to lift the Titanic from the ocean floor?
    Q9: What is the graph of x^x?
    Q10: How can you show geometrically that Pi is between 3 and 4?
    Produced by Dr Tom Crawford at the University of Oxford.
    For more maths content check out Tom's website tomrocksmaths.com/
    You can also follow Tom on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram @tomrocksmaths
    / tomrocksmaths
    / tomrocksmaths
    / tomrocksmaths
    Get your Tom Rocks Maths merchandise here:
    beautifulequations.net/collec...

Комментарии • 245

  • @TomRocksMaths
    @TomRocksMaths  4 года назад +20

    There are still another 9 videos for you to enjoy in the series - find them all here: ruclips.net/video/by8Mf6Lm5I8/видео.html

  • @ANTONIOMARTINEZ-zz4sp
    @ANTONIOMARTINEZ-zz4sp 3 года назад +37

    I met you watching a Numberphile video and fell in love with the way you communicate. And today I found out your maths channel. Thanks a lot for making my day!

  • @Sigma.Infinity
    @Sigma.Infinity Год назад +14

    I thoroughly enjoyed this video. I not only learnt about the gamma function but also about a useful approach to solving difficult integrals, and I was entertained and inspired by your energy and enthusiasm. Thank you!

    • @notgadot
      @notgadot 10 месяцев назад +1

      You're welcome

  • @attilanemeth8914
    @attilanemeth8914 Год назад +6

    Your explanation is as much as a mission about fantastic discoveries and joy of maths as understanding something as a very practical tool to manage a lot of phenomenons in real life.

  • @financewithsom485
    @financewithsom485 6 лет назад +188

    You look like a popstar man

  • @Niawen2011
    @Niawen2011 5 лет назад +7

    Frikking incredible! I've tried & tried to understand the gamma function and you've made it crystal clear in under 12 minutes. Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, !!! I'll be watchin' you, boy.

  • @weaamfahmy
    @weaamfahmy 5 лет назад +40

    Tom!, u r not just understanding mathematics.. U r talented in delevering the msg.. Thank you so much.. I need from you more videos about Taylor expansion, Lagrange multipliers, and more of special functions.. We know the names but it's all empty and easy to forget the second after the exam!,
    And again.. Thanks in advance

  • @anirbansen346
    @anirbansen346 3 года назад +8

    Though I'm a late viewer of your teaching, but it pushes me up to rethink mathematical stuff and helps to study various branches of Maths as well. An emphatic love and respect by my side from India.

  • @nicholasachuz8329
    @nicholasachuz8329 Месяц назад +1

    You just make my life easier everytime i tune in

  • @johannesCmayer
    @johannesCmayer 4 года назад +14

    9:10 Sigma squared is the variance. Sigma is the standard deviation.

  • @arts5852
    @arts5852 4 года назад +2

    Your manner of presentation is very cool. After watching your video I have finally understood what is it. Thank you very much 👍

  • @amirhaziqrazak01
    @amirhaziqrazak01 3 года назад +8

    Thanks man, I didn't understand a thing when my lecturer taught me and suddenly boom! quiz tomorrow. This video literally save my ass

  • @hans170
    @hans170 4 года назад +3

    Amazing video. I hope you continue to make videos like this!

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  4 года назад

      Thanks Hans - and yes that's the plan!

  • @doodelay
    @doodelay 4 года назад +9

    I had always heard of the gamma function but never knew what it was. Then one day I decided to plot factorial function on desmos and that crazy graph with monster asymptotes appeared lol so I had to come see with this was about, thanks for great video

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  4 года назад +1

      Haha love the story - and you're very welcome.

    • @two697
      @two697 2 года назад +1

      I'm heard for the exact same reason

  • @ayadav4714
    @ayadav4714 3 года назад +1

    Great video tom. I greatly enjoy your videos. Thanks. Keep up the awesome.

  • @mehranfarid7432
    @mehranfarid7432 Год назад +1

    You are simply amazing, man. Immediate subscribe.

  • @avtaras
    @avtaras 5 лет назад +3

    Amazing clarity! Thank you!

  • @rupadarshisamanta3288
    @rupadarshisamanta3288 4 года назад +9

    Rockstar mathematician!!
    Explanation is good✌️
    Wow man love from India 🇮🇳🙏🇮🇳

  • @AndyWicks
    @AndyWicks 5 лет назад +3

    Clear, complete and so well explained. Thank you. :-)

  • @jaidev2717
    @jaidev2717 4 года назад +37

    Hey, your explanation was amazing man. Keep it up. Love from India.

  • @allaccount3936
    @allaccount3936 3 года назад +9

    Great man, just great
    I have been trying to understand how the integration by parts was evaluated for the polynomial and exponential function in multiplication there in gamma function.
    But what's the name of the rule you talked about at 5:16
    Thanks you have been very helpful 😊

  • @user-wu8yq1rb9t
    @user-wu8yq1rb9t 2 года назад

    Great Professor ... Great. Especially the last part (distribution function).
    Thank you so much.
    Professor, please let me tell you something (maybe it's not important for you, but for me ...) :
    Most of the time I see, you're kneeling in front of chalkboard! It means a lot to me. Because and In my opinion, it shows how much you love Math and your work (actually your Hobby!). And also it shows, you're such modest person.
    Professor, you are such a real and great teacher.
    Thank you

  • @juliettechiapello6544
    @juliettechiapello6544 3 года назад +2

    Thank you man ! It is clear now. Love from France.

  • @austinhaider105
    @austinhaider105 2 года назад

    This video is incredibly helpful!! Thank you!

  • @thermofluidsscience7164
    @thermofluidsscience7164 4 года назад +8

    Great video, thanks. Just a typo: In the bottom right graph from 3:20 to 7:30, the y-axis should be the gamma function and the x-axis should be x, the real argument of the gamma function.

  •  3 года назад +1

    I admire your work. Thank you.

  • @Surviving_With_Nthangeniph
    @Surviving_With_Nthangeniph 6 лет назад +1

    i jst had to subscribe man you solved all my problems of gamma

  • @cheknauss9867
    @cheknauss9867 6 лет назад +8

    I thoroughly enjoyed this.

  • @tanmoydutta5846
    @tanmoydutta5846 3 года назад +3

    Quite nicely explained....love from India....keep up the good job👍👍👍👍

  • @prabhakargupta8765
    @prabhakargupta8765 3 года назад +1

    Good job man!
    I hope that you will became a successful man in math.

    • @tomjeffered1668
      @tomjeffered1668 3 года назад

      Just watch this impressive Math channel ruclips.net/channel/UCZDkxpcvd-T1uR65Feuj5Yg

  • @athul_c1375
    @athul_c1375 3 года назад +3

    I must say thank you
    I have these gamma beta functions in mathamatical physics which kind of made me confuced
    thank you for your explanation
    you actually helped me to start studying

  • @057tanmaybhagwat2
    @057tanmaybhagwat2 3 года назад +1

    Nice video

  • @aaloksharma6274
    @aaloksharma6274 2 года назад +1

    Great video sir 👏

  • @rekhameena2413
    @rekhameena2413 5 лет назад +2

    It's amazing explanation sir!!

  • @maikbanner7552
    @maikbanner7552 5 лет назад +4

    The Gamma Function is Punkatortially Glamorous in this Tutorial.

  • @avenging209
    @avenging209 5 лет назад +2

    U should become a math professor. You are way better at explaining ideas than so many math teachers i've had.

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  5 лет назад +3

      avenging209 that’s exactly what I do!

    • @jake_runs_the_world
      @jake_runs_the_world 5 лет назад +1

      lmao he's a tutor at St Hugh's College, University of Oxford..........

  • @mindy1835
    @mindy1835 2 года назад

    You are such a great teacher.

  • @enduranceoniegileoniso7904
    @enduranceoniegileoniso7904 2 года назад

    INCREDIBLE ACCENT. +100% CLARITY.

  • @frankguo1363
    @frankguo1363 8 месяцев назад

    Great video Tom! Appreciate it! you explained the process of computation for the gamma function well. Why not discuss its significance a little bit? Like what it simplifies or reveal?

  • @discreet_boson
    @discreet_boson 3 года назад +1

    This channel is so underrated

  • @noworries838
    @noworries838 3 года назад

    his intro killed everything

  • @drewh0208
    @drewh0208 5 лет назад

    Great video! It was fun to listen to. But where were the complex numbers?

  • @user-gk7kv8oc8x
    @user-gk7kv8oc8x 3 года назад

    Your explanation is the best, in spite my English being very bad, i understand it.

  • @mohamadalikardi73
    @mohamadalikardi73 3 года назад +1

    Love your way of explaining can I ask a favor? can you do a video on beta function?? I am currently studying it in my mathematics class and I found your method of explaining is
    easy to understand so thank you on the fun and informative video and can't wait for your reply

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  3 года назад

      Thanks for the suggestion Muhammad, I'll add it to my list :)

  • @Unparallel_roads23
    @Unparallel_roads23 3 года назад +1

    Very good explanation

  • @feixu1038
    @feixu1038 6 лет назад +1

    Hi Tom, thanks for your clear math video sharing. I have a question here: around 5:10, you mention about a magnitude limit rule. Could you tell me the terminology of this rule? I'm not a native speaker and in many cases it's hard for me to link the English term to my language. Thanks a lot!

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  6 лет назад

      Thanks for the question - I think this page does a good job of explaining the idea calculus.seas.upenn.edu/?n=Main.OrdersOfGrowth

  • @aniketeuler6443
    @aniketeuler6443 3 года назад +2

    Sir you cleared my concept 😀

  • @doktorklaus300
    @doktorklaus300 4 года назад +3

    Great ! Thank you !

  • @MsKisshello
    @MsKisshello 2 года назад +1

    thanks!

  • @Addhyan27
    @Addhyan27 2 года назад +1

    thank u so much sir for this video and i can safely say that i draw many analogies from bodybuilding to the branch of mathematics ..just like in body building all parts are trained and sculpted so do here every piece of mathematics must be understood well before constructing the bigger picture

  • @amansinghbhadauria2818
    @amansinghbhadauria2818 5 лет назад +6

    This is how you break stereotypes. #RocksMath

  • @pyrojackson9001
    @pyrojackson9001 Год назад +1

    I have a question, or rather an idea to propose: wouldn't it be a lot easier to solve the integral for gamma of half with polar substitution rather than going all in with probability distribution?

  • @musicsubicandcebu1774
    @musicsubicandcebu1774 5 лет назад +10

    If I understand correctly, root pi comes from the fact that the area under the bell curve = root 2pi . . . what's amazes me is that both e and pi are jointly involved in what can be considered the most powerful force in the universe - the law of averages...

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  4 года назад

      Yes exactly. It's all coming from the Normal Distribution/Gaussian Curve. More info here: ruclips.net/video/xp3J_uSYtD8/видео.html

  • @denizaliduru3670
    @denizaliduru3670 2 года назад

    From all the math guys i saw you are the most "not math guy" looking guy and thats not a compliment.

  • @bekoesamuel7640
    @bekoesamuel7640 5 лет назад +2

    Great explanation. Thank you!

  • @harshanilakmali2636
    @harshanilakmali2636 3 года назад +1

    Thank you

  • @technoultimategaming2999
    @technoultimategaming2999 4 года назад

    I was playing around with a graph function f(x) = x! and f(a) = e^a and that they grow at the same rate eventually

  • @AvinashKumar-cz2yy
    @AvinashKumar-cz2yy 3 года назад

    Please do a video on differentiation under the integral sign

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  2 года назад +1

      will add it to my list - thanks for the suggestion!

  • @faus2417
    @faus2417 6 лет назад +5

    i have a question, at 3:11 you mentioned that this graph shows the full extent of the gamma function but shouldn't that graph be three dimensional(rather than the 2 dimensions shown), you have a Re(z) and Im(z) axis but where is the F(Re(z)+Im(z)) axis ?

    • @teunvanwezel2282
      @teunvanwezel2282 6 лет назад +5

      fau s I think the graph he shows here is a graph of gamma(x), so only for exclusively real numbers. I think he made a mistake here; the axes should be defined as x and y, not Re and Im. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function

    • @massimoesposito7014
      @massimoesposito7014 6 лет назад +1

      Good Boy! It is like that!

    • @chriswilliams1627
      @chriswilliams1627 5 лет назад

      I'm pretty sure its a graph of the domain of gamma function on the Re and lm axes

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  4 года назад +1

      Good spot Fau - the graph is indeed only for the real part of the function. The x-axis is the real part and the y-axis the value of the Gamma Function. My bad.

  • @jonmoore8995
    @jonmoore8995 3 года назад

    I very much appreciate, if you could do a derivation of the normal distribution, that would be great.

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  3 года назад

      I discuss it here in fact: ruclips.net/video/xp3J_uSYtD8/видео.html

  • @samernoureddine
    @samernoureddine 5 лет назад

    Great video! I'd just like to point out that the denominator in phi(x) should contain sigma, not sigma squared

  • @tawfiqueihsan9844
    @tawfiqueihsan9844 3 года назад +1

    Thanks man.

  • @ahole5407
    @ahole5407 2 года назад +1

    could someone explain how this could be used to explain the forgotten index of the Fibonacci cube Gamma(n).

  • @nehalkalita
    @nehalkalita Год назад

    3:14 "Integral can be extended on the left side of the complex plane except for negative integers". I did not understand this part. Can anyone explain?
    When I look at this graph, I think I can see line plotted in negative quadrant.

  • @karthikuppati
    @karthikuppati 5 лет назад +2

    At 3:11 how do you draw the graph for the Gama function?

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  5 лет назад +2

      Hi Karthik, the graph I've drawn is the real part of the function (sorry I mis-labelled the axes) as the full graph gives you a two-dimensional surface. There's a nice plotting tool on Wolfram Mathworld which lets you play around with different values, I recommend trying it out: mathworld.wolfram.com/GammaFunction.html

  • @sdsa007
    @sdsa007 2 года назад

    This is great stuff!!!!!!! I spent so much time learning Gamma from video lectures... I continue to seek intuition on the integral form.... I think the gamma function is actually fits best on a 3D plot... on a 2D plot its mostly depicted as a Real vs Real 2D map.. in other words, I think the 2D map is wrong.... and to make it right we gotta replace Imaginary with Real, and imagine the Imaginary dimension extending into and out of the blackboard! Blackboads are soooo outdated!

  • @Someone-cr8cj
    @Someone-cr8cj 4 года назад

    oh, that guy.

  • @anonimx3512
    @anonimx3512 9 дней назад

    Great👏

  • @benradick1489
    @benradick1489 3 года назад

    Awesome!

  • @thewierdragonbaby4843
    @thewierdragonbaby4843 2 года назад

    I wish I could understand what it means to have an integral from a to b. I want to know how to calculate 0.25! but I don't understand integrals and it will take ages to understand it by just researching it.

  • @lichen2354
    @lichen2354 4 года назад +11

    so useful to me, everything's great! except the side camera's resolution...

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  4 года назад +3

      Thanks Li - fortunately I now have a new camera so my latest videos should be much clearer :)

  • @athul_c1375
    @athul_c1375 3 года назад

    can any one recommend a text book that I can study this

  • @jamesvillanueva8717
    @jamesvillanueva8717 6 лет назад +2

    Nice video! :) at 9:13 don't you mean sigma squared should be variance and standard dev should just be sigma?

    • @elijahbok
      @elijahbok 5 лет назад +2

      yes sigma squared is the variance

    • @eslamelsayed8869
      @eslamelsayed8869 5 лет назад +1

      Exactly

    • @shivanishukla1558
      @shivanishukla1558 5 лет назад

      Where are you from??

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  4 года назад +1

      Yes sigma squared is indeed the variance, and sigma is the standard deviation. Apologies if I mis-spoke.

  • @kummer45
    @kummer45 2 года назад

    Can anyone tell me where this Gamma function comes from? I've read about it, studied with Z being a complex variable and read the history but no one can tell me where this function happened or in what circumstances these mathematicians found it.
    Please if anyone. I'm curious.

  • @doctari1061
    @doctari1061 25 дней назад

    Great example and explanation… however, you didn’t happen to mention what the Gamma Function is actually god for or why it’s used. It leaves me still curious about the application of the function.
    Cheers

  • @rafiqbodalal6358
    @rafiqbodalal6358 6 лет назад +1

    I have a question that I hope you can answer. During my studies of the gamma function, I came across a relation known as the "Stirling's Factorial Approximation." The equation is commonly used to calculate the value of gamma(p) when p is very large. Anyway, when choosing a value of p like 450,000 and substituted that into the equation, I always obtained a value of zero, even though the gamma value at p=450,000 exists. I later discovered that in the equation there was an exponential factor raised to the power of -p. We know that exp(-p) =0 when p>>0. How can the equation have got this wrong? Or is there something I am missing. Big fan of your channel! Thanks in advance :)

    • @thomascrawford1407
      @thomascrawford1407 6 лет назад +2

      Hi Rafiq, thanks for your question. The value of gamma at p=450,000 is actually really large (I got the answer 10^(10^6.370792540767548)). You're right that the exponential function would make such a term small, but if you look carefully at the integral definition, the exponential is actually unchanged no matter which value of gamma that you are calculating. It is an exp(-x) term, where z is the variable in the gamma function. This is why the gamma function will tend to infinity as the input variable tends to infinity.

    • @rafiqbodalal6358
      @rafiqbodalal6358 6 лет назад +1

      Thanks for the swift response. I understand what you're trying to say. The integral definition of the gamma function does indeed have an exponential term that is independent of the gamma function variable "z." But if you recall, my question was concerning the Sterling's Approximation Formula. Here is the equation, perhaps you can calculate the value differently:
      gamma(z+1)=z!=(sqrt[2*pi*z])*(z^z)*(exp[-z])

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  6 лет назад +2

      Apologies I overlooked the fact that you were referring to the approximation, rather than the integral definition. Using the approximation formula as you have given above, the answer will still be very large. Again, I tried inputting your value of 450,000 into the formula on wolfram alpha and obtained 10^(10^6.370793586177315), which is a very close approximation to the answer I obtained above for the exact gamma function. The reason the function continues to increase is due to the z^z term. You are correct that the exponential term exp(-z) will quickly descend to zero for large z, however, the z^z term is also an exponential function. In fact, it will dominate the exponential term for any z>e. To see this, substitute in the value z=e. The z^z term then cancels exactly with the exp(-z) term, leaving only (sqrt[2*pi*z]). Furthermore, if you rearrange the formula by grouping the exponential terms together you have:
      gamma(z+1)=z!=(sqrt[2*pi*z])*(z/e)^z
      Now, hopefully it is clearer that as z tends to infinity, and in particular for z>e, the exponential term to the power z will increase very quickly towards infinity also. Hope that clears it up!

    • @rafiqbodalal6358
      @rafiqbodalal6358 6 лет назад +2

      Got it. Thank you very much for the explanation. Sorry if I made you tired with my question. :)

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  6 лет назад +2

      No problem!

  • @vinitha3237
    @vinitha3237 2 года назад

    The value of √(1/2)= ? a)1/2 b)√π c)√π/2 d)1 .I was asked this question in a test. We don't know the answer,so we asked our teacher ,he said the answer by looking the gamma function in the book where Gamma (1/2)=√π was in the book. I have a doubt that is gamma and root are same?

  • @eswnl1
    @eswnl1 3 года назад +1

    I had to remind myself that when doing gamma(1/2), its not (1/2)! But then to work out what (1/2)! is, you need to calculate gamma(3/2) which is equivalent to 1/2 x gamma(1/2). That is 1/2 x root pi.

    • @tomjeffered1668
      @tomjeffered1668 3 года назад

      Just watch this impressive Math channel ruclips.net/channel/UCZDkxpcvd-T1uR65Feuj5Yg

  • @HardikPatel-re9wz
    @HardikPatel-re9wz 6 лет назад +2

    Genius

  • @avinashk4750
    @avinashk4750 2 года назад

    Is it arithmetic progression

  • @shivakumarnavala2603
    @shivakumarnavala2603 5 лет назад

    you explained gamma function for positive integer(n)...please explain for negtive integers(-n)..

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  4 года назад

      The same integral formula will work for any value of n.

  • @silvadossantos6803
    @silvadossantos6803 3 года назад

    Thank you , could you cover beta-gamma relationship?

  • @alexting827
    @alexting827 5 лет назад +1

    Exponential Integral Gamma function??

  • @antwanwimberly1729
    @antwanwimberly1729 2 года назад

    That’s interesting. N-1!

  • @imfine...7486
    @imfine...7486 5 месяцев назад

    Hi your content is so good ... informative and easily understanding... But just improve the quality of the camera and only one the front view is sufficient don't move the camera view it diverts the focus... Please ...

  • @SuneelKumar-pw1id
    @SuneelKumar-pw1id 3 года назад +2

    You make esay gamma function for me
    thanks

  • @evenprime1658
    @evenprime1658 4 года назад

    Is there way to find a number if you are given only its factorial with some inverse gamma function?? Its really bothering me.. i need answers!!!

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  4 года назад +1

      I think this might be what you're looking for: mathoverflow.net/questions/12828/inverse-gamma-function

    • @evenprime1658
      @evenprime1658 4 года назад

      @@TomRocksMaths Perfect .. thanks!

  • @sdsa007
    @sdsa007 Год назад

    I was upset because the cheetah t-shirt was blocking the equations, which should have been tattooed on your body or silk-screened on the cheetah t-shirt... why is there not a Gamma day?! That would be Factorial!... just kidding I'm not upset, nice video, very concise, which means I didn't get lost in the details!

  • @michaellong7934
    @michaellong7934 3 года назад

    I’m struggling with the u=√x how is it dx=x^1/2(2) I’m getting x^-1/2 (2)

    • @rayannoor8264
      @rayannoor8264 2 года назад +1

      When you divide both sides with what was multiple to du the half becomes 2 and the negative sign changes to positive

  • @Mathemarius
    @Mathemarius 3 года назад

    03:03 Actually this graph shows the gamma function for real values only (you say almost any value for all complex numbers at 03:10)!

  • @Viveksh18
    @Viveksh18 Год назад

    Love from India😍😍😍

  • @advaykumar9726
    @advaykumar9726 2 года назад

    You said in factorial you multiply all whole numbers less or equal but it must be natural numbers

  • @tamilselvanrascal5956
    @tamilselvanrascal5956 3 месяца назад

    🎉🎉🎉

  • @musicincorporate3309
    @musicincorporate3309 6 лет назад +2

    wasn't it root pie over 2 though??

    • @thomascrawford1407
      @thomascrawford1407 6 лет назад

      I'm not sure exactly which part you mean, but the 2 that appears inside the integral after the substitution cancels out with the 1/2 factor to just give root pi.

    • @shaun7583
      @shaun7583 6 лет назад +2

      Music Incorporate I heard it was sqrt(pi)/2 as well.

    • @jainilshah6712
      @jainilshah6712 6 лет назад +2

      No, the factorial of 1/2 is root pi over two.
      The gamma value of 1/2 is root pi

    • @emmauddin2515
      @emmauddin2515 5 лет назад

      @@jainilshah6712 dose that mean that the factorial of -1/2 is root pi?

  • @sharvilpatel1651
    @sharvilpatel1651 Год назад +1

    Hi

  • @gourav1163
    @gourav1163 4 года назад +2

    If you become our teacher ......Girls will attend your every class

  • @emilkeys976
    @emilkeys976 Месяц назад

    The vocabulary you use when describing maths makes it sound very exciting.

  • @confibuzz
    @confibuzz 6 лет назад +6

    I understand the basics of the gamma and the basics of factorials now. Thank you! I loved this. Something to add to my 10 year old brain...

    • @mike4ty4
      @mike4ty4 6 лет назад

      What's wrong with being a nerdboy eh?

    • @DevrimOdabas
      @DevrimOdabas 5 лет назад

      ​@@egeerkut9602 hehe bence adamın kastetmek istediği yaşının 10 olduğu değil mütevazilik yapmaya çalışmış ama olmayadabilir xd

    • @potatoman8763
      @potatoman8763 5 лет назад

      Nobody cares how old you are

    • @ganondorfchampin
      @ganondorfchampin 5 лет назад +2

      Sounds like a bunch of people in the comments are jealous.

  • @himdhiman3796
    @himdhiman3796 4 года назад +1

    love from india

  • @sundaranarasimhan5331
    @sundaranarasimhan5331 4 года назад

    The graph at 3:03 does not make any sense, because the axis are labelled wrongly.
    I guess you wanted to show us the Gamma function restricted to the real line.

    • @tomjeffered1668
      @tomjeffered1668 3 года назад

      Just watch this impressive Math channel ruclips.net/channel/UCZDkxpcvd-T1uR65Feuj5Yg