Sometimes I go into too much of a lesson. I debated on cutting the whole lesson out. I hope people do appreciate it. There are some magnetic ones for mirrorless I think.
That's a perfect way to F up your stabilisation and overall image quality. Use ND's only on ghimbals as IES cannot handle those shutters. That's also why at night the stabilisation goes wacky.
That's just incorrect. They design everything in cameras to operate based on the 180° shutter rule. It would be stupid not to design camera features based on the rules of shooting. Think about it. Now if you go under the 180 rule, like shooting 30 fps with a shutter of 1/30 that will screw with a lot of stuff. That is probably what you are experiencing with night shots. You need to lock your shutter at 180 and let the iso go up to compensate.
@@EddieStudios I don't think so. They design everything to sell you on "cinematic" stuff while the camera can't handle because of physics. It's not made for that type of usage. If it were to be used like that, DJI should have put an optical type stabilisation, not electronic. Even the convention cameras need ghimbals when used with NDs. And 90% of those cameras don't have stabilisation. It doesn't matter anyway. The camera is perfect for what it is, but I would not buy ND's for it as it's not ok for my type of usage.
theres a video of someone testing the digital stabilization with ND filters using the 180 rule with 24 fps and 1/50 shutter. The ONLY way it makes sense to use ND filters for the blur is if your Action 4 is standing still and you are filming something in motion. otherwise you have to have a gimbal@@EddieStudios
I have done further research on this and testing since I made the video and commented last. I agree. The digital stabe gets all weird following the 180 degree rule. You definitely can't do action smooth if you're using the 180 rule. I was wrong before. I'm glad I learned something interesting from this original comment pushing me to look further into it.
вы видео смотрели вообще?!) откручивается он пальцами так то, но зачем его вообще снимать если эти фильтры просто надеваются за счет плотной резиновой прокладки внутри?!
Whenever he uses the ND16, I keep feeling that the ND32 would have been better for all those tests instead. His face still looked blown out in direct sunlight.
Yeah, I was just trying to show all of them, and that was the best location where I could get an ok exposure with the right settings. I should have dropped the iso to 100 instead of 200.
My Amazon link is in the video description. I'm not sure if you use Amazon in the Philippines. If not I will see if they have a site and get that for you.
It's a polarizer. Helps with glare from water, and some say it makes blues in the sky look better. I didn't really have a good place to test it in this video.
It's hard to tell online, but I think the dji ones go one the same way. I'd love to hear if someone else knows.
Thanks for throwing in a lesson with your review. They should make nd filters for mirrorless cameras that go on the same way.
Sometimes I go into too much of a lesson. I debated on cutting the whole lesson out. I hope people do appreciate it.
There are some magnetic ones for mirrorless I think.
That's a perfect way to F up your stabilisation and overall image quality.
Use ND's only on ghimbals as IES cannot handle those shutters. That's also why at night the stabilisation goes wacky.
That's just incorrect. They design everything in cameras to operate based on the 180° shutter rule. It would be stupid not to design camera features based on the rules of shooting. Think about it. Now if you go under the 180 rule, like shooting 30 fps with a shutter of 1/30 that will screw with a lot of stuff. That is probably what you are experiencing with night shots. You need to lock your shutter at 180 and let the iso go up to compensate.
@@EddieStudios I don't think so. They design everything to sell you on "cinematic" stuff while the camera can't handle because of physics. It's not made for that type of usage.
If it were to be used like that, DJI should have put an optical type stabilisation, not electronic.
Even the convention cameras need ghimbals when used with NDs. And 90% of those cameras don't have stabilisation.
It doesn't matter anyway. The camera is perfect for what it is, but I would not buy ND's for it as it's not ok for my type of usage.
theres a video of someone testing the digital stabilization with ND filters using the 180 rule with 24 fps and 1/50 shutter. The ONLY way it makes sense to use ND filters for the blur is if your Action 4 is standing still and you are filming something in motion. otherwise you have to have a gimbal@@EddieStudios
I have done further research on this and testing since I made the video and commented last. I agree. The digital stabe gets all weird following the 180 degree rule. You definitely can't do action smooth if you're using the 180 rule. I was wrong before. I'm glad I learned something interesting from this original comment pushing me to look further into it.
@@overanalyzings did they test it with vlogging style footage, without stabilization on? Can you remember what video you saw?
good info to know they slide on .. i did see some jello when moving though
Yeah. I noticed a bit too. I think sometimes it's good to go a bit high on the shutter speed for fast movement.
yep, I noticed the same especially on the background trees, probably due to a focal length as well
Hi, do you feel like nd32 is strong enough for a bright sunny day shooting at 25 fps, 1/50 shutterspeed? Or do I need stronger ND like nd 64?
It should be strong enough.
convenience is the ultimate masterpiece ..
This man Eddie is quite handsome, he has a nice sweatshirt and cute voice
ND filters helped a bit with the ugly Action 4 sunflares?
Hi. you seem like you really know youre filters. Any thoughts on the "Freewell" filters?😊
I have used them on my other cameras. They are pretty good for a fair price.
Привет, а чем откручивайте обьектив?)
вы видео смотрели вообще?!) откручивается он пальцами так то, но зачем его вообще снимать если эти фильтры просто надеваются за счет плотной резиновой прокладки внутри?!
some said canot adjust the shutter speed on log，is it true？
That's not true. You can adjust the shutter speed in the log 10bit profile.
@@EddieStudios ooh good，thanks🌝👍🏻
Whenever he uses the ND16, I keep feeling that the ND32 would have been better for all those tests instead. His face still looked blown out in direct sunlight.
Yeah, I was just trying to show all of them, and that was the best location where I could get an ok exposure with the right settings. I should have dropped the iso to 100 instead of 200.
So if I go to a Waterpark and go in the water I'll have to remove it?😮
You shouldn't have to.
Bro nice vlog! Greetings from the philippines! Im also using the dji oa 4 where can i buy telesin nd filters
My Amazon link is in the video description. I'm not sure if you use Amazon in the Philippines. If not I will see if they have a site and get that for you.
@@EddieStudios yah bro i saw the link apparently we do not have amazon app or i mean we cannot access it as its too far also
@@EddieStudios i have subbed with you also 🙏
www.telesinstore.com/collections/for-dji-osmo-action-4 that's the company's site in the US. Maybe it will work for you
My videos alway come out so bright for Moto oh oka summer day 😭
U can't use nd filters with 180degree rule. For #4p and hypersmooth. It look very bad
I'm not shure you know what is a CPL filter ...
It's a polarizer. Helps with glare from water, and some say it makes blues in the sky look better. I didn't really have a good place to test it in this video.
Dlog m is a scam. It's a little wider dynamic range but the color space is rec709. Rubbish