"What is Truth?" already has problems. This list describing Objective Truth are all "inductive observations" i.e. "Every measurement made so far yields the same result, which cannot conclude that future results may be different. This is exactly how science works, a theory must encompass known fact but may have to be altered for future data. Any arguments which include words like Ultimate, Certainty, Absolute, Maximal or Perfect are just fallacious.
"using evidence to defend the truth" I prefer to use evidence to find the truth.
BINGO, you beat me to it 💪🏼
"What is Truth?" already has problems.
This list describing Objective Truth are all "inductive observations" i.e. "Every measurement made so far yields the same result, which cannot conclude that future results may be different.
This is exactly how science works, a theory must encompass known fact but may have to be altered for future data.
Any arguments which include words like Ultimate, Certainty, Absolute, Maximal or Perfect are just fallacious.
So, can you conclusively prove your claims are true? No? Then your defence of the Truth is ineffective.