Non credo si possa dare la responsabilità del fallimento degli accordi solo a Sharon (Da Wikipedia): Based on the Israeli definition of the West Bank, Barak offered to form a Palestinian state initially on 73% of the West Bank (that is, 27% less than the Green Line borders) and 100% of the Gaza Strip. In 10-25 years, the Palestinian state would expand to a maximum of 92% of the West Bank (91 percent of the West Bank and 1 percent from a land swap).[9][11] From the Palestinian perspective this equated to an offer of a Palestinian state on a maximum of 86% of the West Bank. Clinton blamed Arafat after the failure of the talks, stating, "I regret that in 2000 Arafat missed the opportunity to bring that nation into being and pray for the day when the dreams of the Palestinian people for a state and a better life will be realized in a just and lasting peace." The failure to come to an agreement was widely attributed to Yasser Arafat, as he walked away from the table without making a concrete counter-offer and because Arafat did little to quell the series of Palestinian riots that began shortly after the summit In generale: On 2 January 2001, the Palestinians put forward their acceptance with some fundamental objections. Barak accepted the parameters with a 20-page letter of reservations.[53] A Sharm el-Sheikh summit planned for 28 December did not take place. Clinton's initiative led to the Taba negotiations in January 2001, where the two sides published a statement saying they had never been closer to agreement (though such issues as Jerusalem, the status of Gaza, and the Palestinian demand for compensation for refugees and their descendants remained unresolved), but Barak, facing elections, re-suspended the talks.[54] Ehud Barak was to be defeated by Ariel Sharon in 2001
Ideologizzati da Boldrin. E' tutta fuffa. Non hanno capito nulla e usano la storia per giustificare il loro punto di vista. Arafat non poteva accettare la mediazione. Il motto era ed è ancora dal Fiume al Mare.
Ottima e chiarissima ricostruzione! Grazie.
Ottimo lavoro, grazie per questa meravigliosa serie... vi aspetto per la prossima :)
Ottimo lavoro
Grazie per il lavoro svolto 😊
Complimenti, lavoro encomiabile ed enorme
Ottimo lavoro, grazie!!
Grazie
Perché non fate un' ulteriore puntata sul periodo dal 2007 ad oggi?
tattico
Mio commento tattico 👍
Non credo si possa dare la responsabilità del fallimento degli accordi solo a Sharon (Da Wikipedia):
Based on the Israeli definition of the West Bank, Barak offered to form a Palestinian state initially on 73% of the West Bank (that is, 27% less than the Green Line borders) and 100% of the Gaza Strip. In 10-25 years, the Palestinian state would expand to a maximum of 92% of the West Bank (91 percent of the West Bank and 1 percent from a land swap).[9][11] From the Palestinian perspective this equated to an offer of a Palestinian state on a maximum of 86% of the West Bank.
Clinton blamed Arafat after the failure of the talks, stating, "I regret that in 2000 Arafat missed the opportunity to bring that nation into being and pray for the day when the dreams of the Palestinian people for a state and a better life will be realized in a just and lasting peace." The failure to come to an agreement was widely attributed to Yasser Arafat, as he walked away from the table without making a concrete counter-offer and because Arafat did little to quell the series of Palestinian riots that began shortly after the summit
In generale:
On 2 January 2001, the Palestinians put forward their acceptance with some fundamental objections. Barak accepted the parameters with a 20-page letter of reservations.[53] A Sharm el-Sheikh summit planned for 28 December did not take place.
Clinton's initiative led to the Taba negotiations in January 2001, where the two sides published a statement saying they had never been closer to agreement (though such issues as Jerusalem, the status of Gaza, and the Palestinian demand for compensation for refugees and their descendants remained unresolved), but Barak, facing elections, re-suspended the talks.[54] Ehud Barak was to be defeated by Ariel Sharon in 2001
Ideologizzati da Boldrin. E' tutta fuffa. Non hanno capito nulla e usano la storia per giustificare il loro punto di vista.
Arafat non poteva accettare la mediazione. Il motto era ed è ancora dal Fiume al Mare.
concordo
ho anche scritto una risposta
ma è sparita
giovani democrature crescono.