I was walking down the street and saw a woman getting her butt kicked by some dude. She yelled out for help and I yelled back, "No! You're a strong and independent woman who dont need no man! You got this!" And i kept walking. I spent 6 years in the infantry and 12 years as a police/swat officer and I could have easily stopped him.. but na... not my problem ladies you dont need no man. Right?
@@BrandonLeechabsolutely but some men have been truly betrayed and a period of anger is completely normal and healthy. Depends on how hard you were screwed over and set personality traits but what you described is definitively the perfect situation.
I agree with Cappy on much of this. However whenever we go into this I tend to disagree with him on 3 points. First He is listening to what women say vs what they do. 2nd he tends to ignore what women are told. They are interested in men, however they are fed a delusion that you can have everything at your own time table. Also that they will love you for who you are. They think that the Jason Mamoa, astronaut, fighter pilot millionaire will always be there waiting for them after they ride the carousel and pursue a useless career till they are 28-30. The anger comes from the fact that once they get to that stage the men they want are not available, but going for there younger version. They then take there frustration out on the average man who they have been told for 20 years is beneath them. 3rd On the subject of liking men, most women like men. They love them as friends and orbitors. Men are like the teddy bear they had as a kid. I believe Rollo said that once. They love having them around. The anger comes out when the "teddy bear" comes on to them. To conclude I dont think women "not liking men that much" is true. I would say they are not ATTRACTED to men that much. In other words, they are only attracted to the top 10%.
He means attractive when he said likes and the men you are talking about them “liking” could be argued aren’t liked for them. Those women like the way those men’s investments in them make them feel.
I would like to disagree my good sir, and I will explain myself below. 1. "He's listening to what women say and not what they do." I don't think so. I think Cappy and pretty much every other man is reacting to women's behavior, not their words. Do we have to once again go through the list of all the things women would rather have than a husband? Education, career, post-secondary education, living alone, shoes, bags, stuffing their face, riding the rooster roundabout, having T-Rash's kids, politics, activism, etc, etc. It's not just the "we don't need men" mantra that we hear - their actions speak louder than their words. 2. "You're not taking into account what women are told." Well, maybe, but what difference does this make? Women put finding a husband 7th on their list of priorities. Who cares if they make this choice of their own free will or if they've been told they better make that choice or they won't be popular? They still made the choice, and you're not gonna fix that. At least not in your lifetime. 3. "Women like men, they just aren't attracted to them. They view them like teddy bears. They like having them around, but once the men start coming on to them, it's over." Not only did Aaron say this multiple times, but you just made Aaron's point for him. What you have essentially just said is that women do like men, but only if those men are not sentient human beings. That's a pretty damning refutation of the idea that women like men. Thanks for the comment, it was interesting to think about.
Behavior is based on incentives in combination with environment. Once seggsual accountability was removed from XXs, their value system was destroyed. The pill, the "procedure", divorce courts, and the welfare state effectively removed every last scintilla of accountability for any reproductive or relationship choice. There's no overstating the devastation which is wrought to a person's virtue once accountability is removed from them as a young adult. Virtue only exists in response to accountability -- either the slight accountability meted out by parents who are instilling virtues, or the harsh accountability given by nature or the state when virtues weren't instilled in youth. Without accountability, there can rarely be virtue. A person without virtue is a vile hedonistic creature who has no principles whatsoever -- neither loyalty, nor temperance, nor anything else. if you don't endure some consequence for hedonism, then you don't value anything which can't provide a hedonistic supply. But here's an iron law of reality: accountability can never be avoided, it can only be deferred. If you artificially avoid accountability, you'd better plan on living a short life because reality will assert accountability even if the state has attempted to remove it. Thus it is that most XXs who divorce end up in poverty -- because the hedonism which caused them to divorce prevents them from saving any of the alimony the man provides or planning for the future in any way. That's why some states invented permanent alimony -- they knew the pattern. But accountability is now arriving for the state. Men have caught on to the marriage scam. Those who could get married aren't. Also, most XXs are making themselves unfit for marriage because their lack of accountability has resulted in a human being who is unloved and unlovable. They believe they're worth the devotion of a man which nature has never produced. A man who can meet a checklist of 100 items -- with the body of Chad, the bank account of Elon Musk, the free time of a philanthropist, and the spine of a worm. Most of those line item demands are so mutually exclusive of one another it's laughable that a creature capable of cognition could invent such a list. Virtue yields it's fruits in the mid and long term. The deprivations of hedonism are sowed early -- then reaped in the long term. Accountability is the disincentive against hedonism. Hedonism is predicated upon a nonexistence of accountability. The only way a person can acquire this notion is if all short term accountability is removed. Childhood exists so that children are trained with the mild accountability of parents so that the older child (and adult) won't fall prey to the more brutal accountability of nature and the state. Behavior is a result of nature interacting with incentives. If the incentive structure is distorted from the natural incentives (by science and voting for other people's money) then the adult's behavior will be as pathological as the distortion which has been inflicted upon the incentives. The absurd assertion "women are women everywhere" is the assertion that their behavior is the same everywhere. It's not. It's only as vile as society allows them to be. If men weren't incentivized against violence by the law, many of us would've eliminated our enemies long ago and moved on with our lives as if it was just a Tuesday. This has occurred many times in history when men were incentivized to become beasts -- as in Soviet Russia -- one of the greatest bloodbaths mankind has ever recorded. It's not the average man's nature to eliminate men, women, and children in the millions -- but it was the average Soviet's nature to either perform those acts or accept them. Behavior operates in a context of incentives. The lack of apparent interest you seen in XXs is a result that they all believe that the supply of men is infinite -- because their ride on the CC made them believe that they were. The forest of Ds fooled them into thinking they were overvalued by men -- when most of those men just viewed them as a fleshlight they didn't have to clean afterward. Movies and TV reinforced these ideas. It even made men believe them -- I was among them. But that spell has been broken. The old media is in it's death throes and the red pill is fully in the wild and self sustaining. Accountability is arriving for decades of hedonism. By 2030, almost half of XXs will be permanently single and childless -- which doesn't include the XXs who will be permanently single and with children. Accountability can't be avoided, it can only be deferred. The piper must be paid in the end. I'm just glad that I'll be around to see it.
@@edenbreckhouse you think Muslims don't believe in accountability? You clearly have no idea about the faith. I expect that you're an American Christian with little experience of the world and little serious interest in studying a religion which you consider to be the 'enemy'. I'm not here to convince you of anything accept that anybody who knows Islam will tell you that accountability is a massive part of the faith. Every man will ultimately be questioned by God about his deeds and one of the questions will be How did he earn his money and how did he spend it?Some muslims do behave badly but that doesn't put Islam into question. Im sure you would say the same of Christianity.
@@alexdenton9176 Not sure you'll make it as a comedian but I'm sure you have talents in other areas. There is a famous saying in Arabic "Take account of your own actions (correct your life) before God takes (your final) account of you (on the Last Day). Basically check yourself before you wreck yourself :)
I'll add one more thing to this. 16:38 Not only are many women resentful they couldn't lock down the man they really wanted. They are resentful all the other men in the world don't live up to their unrealistic expectations.
DADDY Gov't has replaced men - except - time is running out as it can only sustain deficit spending for so long - Now it's going to turn into "stakeholder" capitalism - and that's when the real face of HELL will become readily apparent. Women will reject the very corporations they blindly supported in the past. Tick Tick Tick... they won't realize this until most of the population is unemployed.
the only difference is women are not sexually attracted to most men, while men are sexually attracted to most women, by default. neither have this inborn interest in the other gender, but men at least have sexual interest, and don't understand women are not that sexually attracted to most of them. women can be interested if they want children or a family, or a LTR, but this is highly subjective.
it's just how we evolved as a species. men must reproduce period but women only need to reproduce with the "best. we'd die out as a species if women had the exact same interest in men as men do us.
Men made the world so safe, and life so easy, women feel they don't need us anymore. We kinda did it to ourselves, by making things easier and safer in an attempt to "woo" women into being with us, we easy and safed ourselves out of a job.Until/unless the balloon goes up, they'll never see that everything they take for granted is provided for them by that legion of nameless, faceless guys they'd never look at let alone have a relationship with.
I would argue that this is just the next step in our progression as a species, we wont make it out of our solar system if we cant even figure out our intergender dynamics/relations. If we succeed with this "tribulation" it would possibly start developing a real appreciation between the sexes instead of just us needing each other. If people finally understand that men and women are built for different roles and have different strengths AND they learn to appreciate and value those complementary strengths then we will go farther as a species as opposed to women needing men to survive and men having to take on the mantle and do the hard/dangerous jobs only because we can. Let me know if that was too autistic or if that made some sense.
Good men made good times and now they hate all the good men cannot accept that what they get isn't based on them being goddesses and perfect but by the pale nerds that did so much and sacrificed so much to keep them safe
@@oceanhedonist265 Many of us tried to mitigate and stop such a winter and then they called us sexist for even warning about it now our arms are crossed angry and waiting to stare them down as they begin begging already did it to one
Thanks cappy I think your correct I am mixing up survival and attraction. Just trying to logic my way through this environment as for open hatred and misandry maybe that’s more me being aware of media and online more so than in person so your probably correct most women just don’t care.
@@beastwithredpillthat doesn’t always work though because even though they don’t need you they’d rather have you paying for most things so they can save more of their own money
I used to get pretty mad with a lot of women's partner choice. It never made sense why a lot of these smart girls who took care of themselves would often end up with men who never really respected them. As i've gotten older i've finally started to see women wise up out of these relationships and avoid these types of men. It's good seeing women not marrying losers and rewarding degenerate behaviour. However, the outcome is that they just stop dating all together. They give up on finding love and you sort of realise that they were never going to be interested in you, no matter the circumstance. I think back to my life and I realise that I can't really win without cheating the system a bit. I can't win authentically, and the next best play is to draw.
They continue to bang losers and degenerates. They're just more discrete about it as they age. Their preferences and what attracts them does not change
Most of your comment is spot-on, but the part where they "wise up", later in life is really not true. Almost all of them continue to play the same mind games with Men and become immediately disinterested in anything serious with a Man once they know he really is into her. They lose all attraction. This is true for ones in their 50's, 60's, even 70's. They never change.
If it makes you feel better, as you get older, you honestly do tend to care less and less about it. You also get to experience the flip where you're bringing more value to the table and you get to see the ones that based their worldview on the confrontational foundation suffer. Personally, I can't really feel schadenfreude about that anymore, it's just sad. It's like watching a never-ending herd of lemmings go off a cliff.
Most women will not like most men they meet and will make an instant decision, usually without telling the man this. This lack of transparency leads to a lot of problems later on, including men wasting time and resources, as men wrongly believe they just need to win them over. However, if you come across a women who 'likes' you pretty much from the 1st encounter, well that women can stay with you for a long time. There are attractive women with average men, and its not because there funny or rich, its simply because when they met them they genuinely liked them.
Put a group of women with a group of male models and watch how the dynamic changes. Heck put a group of women with any group of men in a consistent friend group where the norm is hooking up and there is no shaming for doing so and they will hook up with most of the men. It's a weird dynamic that implies that it's not that they don't like men, it's that liking men is harmful to their ultimate goal which is reaching the top of social hierarchies. Women compete by attaining the best man they can and having him display stupidity for her as a display of their status and power over him.
I wouldn't be interested in most men if I were a woman. I saw the other boys trying to collect all the man bling, and using it to pressure one another to prove they were men. I took it as a given and I laughed at men who resorted to those strategies, until I saw how much it was hurting them, so I would try to tell them, but they wouldn't listen to me. I didn't have any of the bling and I didn't give a damn about it. I just related directly to women as I was, saying what I believed, telling them what I wanted or expected of them, and enduring their rejections. But I was rejecting them too, most of them before they even realized it. I hated some of the games young men played to show themselves men, and when they got out of hand, I knocked them down a peg or ran them off. When women were present, they looked at me like they wanted to devour me and it was hard to shake them off, because I didn't like them. I thought they were bloody minded and vindictive about men, so they thought they could use me like a tool to beat up every man they hated. I tried to stoop to dating a girl like that and she went around the bar, trying to pick fights with every man in the bar. Women who hate men love to use them against other men. They don't really give a damn about you.
Very well said. Especially the last bit about many women wanting to use their man against other men. I'm a Christian and its interesting to me that the curse God put on Eve was that she would desire to rule over her husband. In my experience, there are few things that women enjoy more or are more attracted to, than harnessing the power of their man for something. Unfortunately a lot of times, they harness that power for bad. And it still amazes me how many guys don't see this. Maybe its their mother putting chivalric ideas in their head, and their dad confirming that out of deference to the mother. In any event, a lot of dudes are out there blind as a bat, walking around as bait.
Genius comment. What you wrote in your words actually basically illustrates the whole reality of "Fragile Masculinity", just as such was also depicted in that latest Barbie Movie with "Ken" and his Second Class position with Barbie and living in "Barbieland". The odd thing is that the Men who expend energy trying to prove "Masculinity" rarely have it, and because they expend this energy, when it comes to live and be Masculine, they are found ill-equipped. Real Men need not prove themselves to anyone, and especially not to other Men, but I say that with a grain of caution under the assumption that the Man is truly a Man of his word, is principled and worth his weight in Gold. Otherwise, all of that would go out the window. But surely, playing games, trying to chase Women, trying to make bets about who can drink the most alcohol or down the most hot dogs and other nonsense like that, are for Weak, Unmanly Men. Gym-goers are also very unmanly. Sacrificing their health, pleasure and longevity to maintain a monopoly on their strength, at the cost of having a decent overall life especially as they age and run into many health issues.
What makes women attracted to men is what women by their nature cannot have, namely masculine confidence, energy, charisma, strength, potential, or what the Romans called Vir. Wuhmun can make believe all they want with their careers, wealth, status and everything else traditionally held by men, but women will never, ever possess Vir. The OP insists on romantic relationships between men and women being dictated by materialism, but that's only a small part of the whole. Beyond the material is the underlying spiritual and cosmic principle and nature of Vir, which is not fully understood by men and far less so by women, but they both wish to possess it in different ways, either directly in the case of men or through men in the case of women.
Montana and Idaho are awesome. Old growth forests, lakes surrounded by miles and miles of forest, pretty conservative generally (stay away from Boise), and the weather is great. If you can get out there, do it. Its expensive here in the Pac NW, but if you look around you can find something...especially if you buy raw land and homestead. Best of luck my man! 👍
I don't think Cappy is right about the top 5% or 10%. I would say it's more like the top 40%. Dating app statistics are incredibly misleading. If an average man signed up for Tinder, and had 500 matches within the first day, then those average men would select for the most attractive women also. The majority of women don't even use dating apps. Which is why there's always at least twice as many men on them as women. But luckily for men, the bar is set so low today, that you really don't have to be a Chad to be in the top 40% of men. And I know this is true from personal experience.
To be perfectly honest, should men care that women don't want them? And yet, you have women that claim they're upset that they're not getting attention from men. But then they go back to doing the same damn thing they've always done, once a man shows any sort of interest in them. So men shouldn't even spend a moment's worth of anything for women. They'll just circle back to who they always were, it's not worth the energy. Thanos: Men can live on an entirely different planet, and their very existence and knowledge of everything man has ever created, will not exist in this reality Women: **Loud squabblings of protests** Thanos: 💢SNAP💢 Women: 💩
Some men are gonna care. People get their feelings hurt when they're told they're not wanted. Not only men, but women too. Even women who don't want men get pissed off if you tell them no man wants them. The internet survives on the wailing of rejected women who don't even like men. It's an ego thing. If you try to pat a dog on the head and it runs away, even that's going to hurt an average person's feelings.
Although this was an admirable attempt at explaining the current situation, I don't think you truly understand w0men and what exactly they're attracted to. You stated that "W0men never liked men that much" and "W0men's attraction to men has been low or a fraction of men's attraction to w0men for all of human history." If those statements were true, then why do chicks go completely bonkers and hysterical when in the presence of a rockstar, a pop star or an A-list actor? And these aren't a "minority of w0men", by any stretch of the imagination; they fill stadiums. Anyone can see that their attraction level is through the roof. The same thing goes for a typical Chad, albeit on a smaller scale. So it's easily demonstrable that w0men in general are wildly attracted to specific types of men-they're just not attracted to the average man, unfortunately. With that said, I enjoy your content. Your analysis is usually spot-on and quite entertaining.
I found that in other countries, especially 3rd world countries, women will pursue guys that have good jobs and be repulsed by poor men, even if they're bad boys and are good looking chads. It's not that they want these chads but are practically choosing more well off albeit beta males, it's that they are repulsed by them.
@@adisc7475 In Arab countries, specifically Egypt since I saw it there first hand all the time. I can't explain women's rational since I'm not a woman. But here's what it might be: 1) If you're an engineer, doctor, i.e work a good job, you'll exhibit certain behaviors and confidence that even Tyrones from the ghetto won't. Assuming that you're not socially retarded and physically repulsive, a good job means you have options when it comes to marriage unlike the US. Don't get me wrong, looks still matter and a handsome engineer will win out over an ugly one. But an ugly engineer will overall still win over a handsome electrician (which is a low class job there). 2) Social class is a much bigger thing over there. 3) Another thing is that if you have a good job, you don't need to have much game (just basic social skills). Since you're already high status, girls will gravitate towards you regardless of game. 4) Dating here is way simpler. Choose the girl. Ask her dad for her hand in marriage. If the dad and daughter agree, get engaged. Get married. 5) Bad boy behavior isn't attractive to most women here unless the women are from the ghetto. It's all about having a good job and taking care of your woman. 6) Girls being 304s and sleeping around is seen as repugnant and disgusting behavior. When girls there say they're virgins, they're not joking. Almost all of them are. Slut behavior will bring shame to the family and sometimes may lead to the girl being disowned or killed. Overall, I don't think female nature has changed. It's just that girls there value different things. Social status in the West, at least regarding sexual marketplace value, is monopolized by bad boys and thugs. Whereas sexual marketplace value in Egypt gives value to a good job and responsibility (it's hard to believe but no joke). Also, the courtship/dating culture here hasn't been ruined yet by what's going on in the west.
I think women used to do the same in America. Women used to need men, and they don't anymore. At least not... A man. Women can provide for themselves financially, so now they go after the men who are more attractive and the bad boys. Women in poor countries are focused on their survival. Women in Western countries are focused on which men give them the fuzzy wuzzies.
Don't get it twisted, because you basically gave the answer away in your comment and observation that proves that the 3rd worlders only want you for your money and are repulsed if you don't have it. Now, why do you think that is!? Women who are attracted to you on the basis of your job, only care about money and you being a provider and nesting plan for them to have children. Especially the whole notion of if a guy is a Lawyer, Doctor or Engineer. The "esteem" in those positions comes from typically Backwater countries, especially ones who lived through Communism and are largely undeveloped, where they were programmed to believe that the only valuable Men became Lawyers, Doctors and Engineers. If you land one of those girls on your laps, you are in a SORE spot of total disappointment and have no clue what kind of an empty soul you've embarked upon. Sure, she'll sex you up. She'll even cook and clean for you, iron your clothes. But all the fun ends there. In most cases, they also have a long-term boyfriend or husband who they really are with, of their own ethnicity, behind the scenes.
Let's cut through all the bullshit and tell it like it is: 1. Men enjoy sex much more than women. 2. Women resent this like hell. It's REALLY That simple!
I was walking down the street and saw a woman getting her butt kicked by some dude. She yelled out for help and I yelled back, "No! You're a strong and independent woman who dont need no man! You got this!" And i kept walking. I spent 6 years in the infantry and 12 years as a police/swat officer and I could have easily stopped him.. but na... not my problem ladies you dont need no man. Right?
Youre a good man
what is worse than hate. Indifference.
Be as hateful and indifferent to women as they are to you.
"Tit for tat" is a well known economic tactic. That stated, don't be the leader with hate.
Don’t waste your time or energy hating anything or anybody. Don’t get mad. Get solutions and do you.
@@BrandonLeechabsolutely but some men have been truly betrayed and a period of anger is completely normal and healthy. Depends on how hard you were screwed over and set personality traits but what you described is definitively the perfect situation.
@@BrandonLeechyes however as we have deduced their is no solution when another entire gender is involved and has little interest
I agree with Cappy on much of this. However whenever we go into this I tend to disagree with him on 3 points. First He is listening to what women say vs what they do. 2nd he tends to ignore what women are told. They are interested in men, however they are fed a delusion that you can have everything at your own time table. Also that they will love you for who you are. They think that the Jason Mamoa, astronaut, fighter pilot millionaire will always be there waiting for them after they ride the carousel and pursue a useless career till they are 28-30. The anger comes from the fact that once they get to that stage the men they want are not available, but going for there younger version. They then take there frustration out on the average man who they have been told for 20 years is beneath them. 3rd On the subject of liking men, most women like men. They love them as friends and orbitors. Men are like the teddy bear they had as a kid. I believe Rollo said that once. They love having them around. The anger comes out when the "teddy bear" comes on to them. To conclude I dont think women "not liking men that much" is true. I would say they are not ATTRACTED to men that much. In other words, they are only attracted to the top 10%.
He means attractive when he said likes and the men you are talking about them “liking” could be argued aren’t liked for them. Those women like the way those men’s investments in them make them feel.
I would like to disagree my good sir, and I will explain myself below.
1. "He's listening to what women say and not what they do." I don't think so. I think Cappy and pretty much every other man is reacting to women's behavior, not their words. Do we have to once again go through the list of all the things women would rather have than a husband? Education, career, post-secondary education, living alone, shoes, bags, stuffing their face, riding the rooster roundabout, having T-Rash's kids, politics, activism, etc, etc. It's not just the "we don't need men" mantra that we hear - their actions speak louder than their words.
2. "You're not taking into account what women are told." Well, maybe, but what difference does this make? Women put finding a husband 7th on their list of priorities. Who cares if they make this choice of their own free will or if they've been told they better make that choice or they won't be popular? They still made the choice, and you're not gonna fix that. At least not in your lifetime.
3. "Women like men, they just aren't attracted to them. They view them like teddy bears. They like having them around, but once the men start coming on to them, it's over." Not only did Aaron say this multiple times, but you just made Aaron's point for him. What you have essentially just said is that women do like men, but only if those men are not sentient human beings. That's a pretty damning refutation of the idea that women like men.
Thanks for the comment, it was interesting to think about.
Behavior is based on incentives in combination with environment. Once seggsual accountability was removed from XXs, their value system was destroyed. The pill, the "procedure", divorce courts, and the welfare state effectively removed every last scintilla of accountability for any reproductive or relationship choice.
There's no overstating the devastation which is wrought to a person's virtue once accountability is removed from them as a young adult. Virtue only exists in response to accountability -- either the slight accountability meted out by parents who are instilling virtues, or the harsh accountability given by nature or the state when virtues weren't instilled in youth.
Without accountability, there can rarely be virtue. A person without virtue is a vile hedonistic creature who has no principles whatsoever -- neither loyalty, nor temperance, nor anything else.
if you don't endure some consequence for hedonism, then you don't value anything which can't provide a hedonistic supply.
But here's an iron law of reality: accountability can never be avoided, it can only be deferred. If you artificially avoid accountability, you'd better plan on living a short life because reality will assert accountability even if the state has attempted to remove it. Thus it is that most XXs who divorce end up in poverty -- because the hedonism which caused them to divorce prevents them from saving any of the alimony the man provides or planning for the future in any way. That's why some states invented permanent alimony -- they knew the pattern.
But accountability is now arriving for the state. Men have caught on to the marriage scam. Those who could get married aren't. Also, most XXs are making themselves unfit for marriage because their lack of accountability has resulted in a human being who is unloved and unlovable. They believe they're worth the devotion of a man which nature has never produced. A man who can meet a checklist of 100 items -- with the body of Chad, the bank account of Elon Musk, the free time of a philanthropist, and the spine of a worm.
Most of those line item demands are so mutually exclusive of one another it's laughable that a creature capable of cognition could invent such a list.
Virtue yields it's fruits in the mid and long term. The deprivations of hedonism are sowed early -- then reaped in the long term.
Accountability is the disincentive against hedonism. Hedonism is predicated upon a nonexistence of accountability. The only way a person can acquire this notion is if all short term accountability is removed. Childhood exists so that children are trained with the mild accountability of parents so that the older child (and adult) won't fall prey to the more brutal accountability of nature and the state.
Behavior is a result of nature interacting with incentives. If the incentive structure is distorted from the natural incentives (by science and voting for other people's money) then the adult's behavior will be as pathological as the distortion which has been inflicted upon the incentives.
The absurd assertion "women are women everywhere" is the assertion that their behavior is the same everywhere. It's not. It's only as vile as society allows them to be.
If men weren't incentivized against violence by the law, many of us would've eliminated our enemies long ago and moved on with our lives as if it was just a Tuesday. This has occurred many times in history when men were incentivized to become beasts -- as in Soviet Russia -- one of the greatest bloodbaths mankind has ever recorded. It's not the average man's nature to eliminate men, women, and children in the millions -- but it was the average Soviet's nature to either perform those acts or accept them.
Behavior operates in a context of incentives. The lack of apparent interest you seen in XXs is a result that they all believe that the supply of men is infinite -- because their ride on the CC made them believe that they were. The forest of Ds fooled them into thinking they were overvalued by men -- when most of those men just viewed them as a fleshlight they didn't have to clean afterward.
Movies and TV reinforced these ideas. It even made men believe them -- I was among them.
But that spell has been broken. The old media is in it's death throes and the red pill is fully in the wild and self sustaining. Accountability is arriving for decades of hedonism. By 2030, almost half of XXs will be permanently single and childless -- which doesn't include the XXs who will be permanently single and with children.
Accountability can't be avoided, it can only be deferred. The piper must be paid in the end. I'm just glad that I'll be around to see it.
Great comment. Accountability is a powerful word.
It certainly is which is why some groups (women, black people, muslims etc) really hate the idea of being held accountable).
@@edenbreckhouse you think Muslims don't believe in accountability? You clearly have no idea about the faith. I expect that you're an American Christian with little experience of the world and little serious interest in studying a religion which you consider to be the 'enemy'. I'm not here to convince you of anything accept that anybody who knows Islam will tell you that accountability is a massive part of the faith. Every man will ultimately be questioned by God about his deeds and one of the questions will be How did he earn his money and how did he spend it?Some muslims do behave badly but that doesn't put Islam into question. Im sure you would say the same of Christianity.
Very well written my friend.
I'm glad I'll be here for the closing credits myself.
@@alexdenton9176 Not sure you'll make it as a comedian but I'm sure you have talents in other areas. There is a famous saying in Arabic "Take account of your own actions (correct your life) before God takes (your final) account of you (on the Last Day). Basically check yourself before you wreck yourself :)
I'll add one more thing to this. 16:38 Not only are many women resentful they couldn't lock down the man they really wanted. They are resentful all the other men in the world don't live up to their unrealistic expectations.
DADDY Gov't has replaced men - except - time is running out as it can only sustain deficit spending for so long - Now it's going to turn into "stakeholder" capitalism - and that's when the real face of HELL will become readily apparent. Women will reject the very corporations they blindly supported in the past. Tick Tick Tick... they won't realize this until most of the population is unemployed.
the only difference is women are not sexually attracted to most men, while men are sexually attracted to most women, by default. neither have this inborn interest in the other gender, but men at least have sexual interest, and don't understand women are not that sexually attracted to most of them. women can be interested if they want children or a family, or a LTR, but this is highly subjective.
it's just how we evolved as a species. men must reproduce period but women only need to reproduce with the "best. we'd die out as a species if women had the exact same interest in men as men do us.
Men made the world so safe, and life so easy, women feel they don't need us anymore. We kinda did it to ourselves, by making things easier and safer in an attempt to "woo" women into being with us, we easy and safed ourselves out of a job.Until/unless the balloon goes up, they'll never see that everything they take for granted is provided for them by that legion of nameless, faceless guys they'd never look at let alone have a relationship with.
I would argue that this is just the next step in our progression as a species, we wont make it out of our solar system if we cant even figure out our intergender dynamics/relations. If we succeed with this "tribulation" it would possibly start developing a real appreciation between the sexes instead of just us needing each other. If people finally understand that men and women are built for different roles and have different strengths AND they learn to appreciate and value those complementary strengths then we will go farther as a species as opposed to women needing men to survive and men having to take on the mantle and do the hard/dangerous jobs only because we can.
Let me know if that was too autistic or if that made some sense.
What jobs do these women have where they don't mind working for a salary? I'd like to know as i wouldn't mind being in that kind of position either
Good men made good times and now they hate all the good men cannot accept that what they get isn't based on them being goddesses and perfect but by the pale nerds that did so much and sacrificed so much to keep them safe
Don't fret, winter is coming.
@@oceanhedonist265 Many of us tried to mitigate and stop such a winter and then they called us sexist for even warning about it now our arms are crossed angry and waiting to stare them down as they begin begging already did it to one
Thanks cappy I think your correct I am mixing up survival and attraction. Just trying to logic my way through this environment as for open hatred and misandry maybe that’s more me being aware of media and online more so than in person so your probably correct most women just don’t care.
"You're."
@@TheSteeVeauI hate when people do that, WTF😂😂😂😂 stop autocorrecting me 😅
If a women likes you today she’s doesn’t need to be with you but she wants to be with you and that’s how you know if it’s legit, in some aspects
@@beastwithredpillthat doesn’t always work though because even though they don’t need you they’d rather have you paying for most things so they can save more of their own money
@@jimmymaracas6442 you have a point
I used to get pretty mad with a lot of women's partner choice. It never made sense why a lot of these smart girls who took care of themselves would often end up with men who never really respected them. As i've gotten older i've finally started to see women wise up out of these relationships and avoid these types of men. It's good seeing women not marrying losers and rewarding degenerate behaviour. However, the outcome is that they just stop dating all together. They give up on finding love and you sort of realise that they were never going to be interested in you, no matter the circumstance.
I think back to my life and I realise that I can't really win without cheating the system a bit. I can't win authentically, and the next best play is to draw.
They continue to bang losers and degenerates. They're just more discrete about it as they age. Their preferences and what attracts them does not change
Yep once they get into their “epiphany phase” were they stop dating the jerks and go for the gump beta bob. No thanks I’m done with these clowns
Most of your comment is spot-on, but the part where they "wise up", later in life is really not true. Almost all of them continue to play the same mind games with Men and become immediately disinterested in anything serious with a Man once they know he really is into her. They lose all attraction. This is true for ones in their 50's, 60's, even 70's. They never change.
They wise up after they lose their virginity to losers? No thanks
If it makes you feel better, as you get older, you honestly do tend to care less and less about it. You also get to experience the flip where you're bringing more value to the table and you get to see the ones that based their worldview on the confrontational foundation suffer. Personally, I can't really feel schadenfreude about that anymore, it's just sad. It's like watching a never-ending herd of lemmings go off a cliff.
Between 2008 and 2012 around 10000 (or more)women from Spain married to Germany. Let that sink in...
Did they marry the nation of Germany?
@@MrOgyny almost 😄. They married with Germans
@@primozmokorel3589 Dang it! I thought the Germans were up to eugenics again 😂 Seriously though, that statistic is alarming.
Pennsylvania also has a "privilege to work" tax. I live there but work in Maryland so I don't have to pay it. And I get cheaper gas in MD too.
Most women will not like most men they meet and will make an instant decision, usually without telling the man this. This lack of transparency leads to a lot of problems later on, including men wasting time and resources, as men wrongly believe they just need to win them over. However, if you come across a women who 'likes' you pretty much from the 1st encounter, well that women can stay with you for a long time. There are attractive women with average men, and its not because there funny or rich, its simply because when they met them they genuinely liked them.
Women should make the first move on men more often. They have better social communication skills then men do.
women are way smoother at chatting and socially fitting in than most men.
It isn't going to happen. Women think most men are beneath them. 🤷
He should name his movie review channel Ousama been watchin...
Uh oh here come the youtube censors O.o
Put a group of women with a group of male models and watch how the dynamic changes. Heck put a group of women with any group of men in a consistent friend group where the norm is hooking up and there is no shaming for doing so and they will hook up with most of the men. It's a weird dynamic that implies that it's not that they don't like men, it's that liking men is harmful to their ultimate goal which is reaching the top of social hierarchies. Women compete by attaining the best man they can and having him display stupidity for her as a display of their status and power over him.
Men don’t need women. Enough said.
yet thats all they ever talk about
Adding a 10 year supply of food and tank to store water to my shopping cart
The intro always cracks me up 😂
I wouldn't be interested in most men if I were a woman.
I saw the other boys trying to collect all the man bling, and using it to pressure one another to prove they were men.
I took it as a given and I laughed at men who resorted to those strategies, until I saw how much it was hurting them, so I would try to tell them, but they wouldn't listen to me.
I didn't have any of the bling and I didn't give a damn about it.
I just related directly to women as I was, saying what I believed, telling them what I wanted or expected of them, and enduring their rejections.
But I was rejecting them too, most of them before they even realized it.
I hated some of the games young men played to show themselves men, and when they got out of hand, I knocked them down a peg or ran them off.
When women were present, they looked at me like they wanted to devour me and it was hard to shake them off, because I didn't like them. I thought they were bloody minded and vindictive about men, so they thought they could use me like a tool to beat up every man they hated.
I tried to stoop to dating a girl like that and she went around the bar, trying to pick fights with every man in the bar.
Women who hate men love to use them against other men.
They don't really give a damn about you.
Very well said. Especially the last bit about many women wanting to use their man against other men. I'm a Christian and its interesting to me that the curse God put on Eve was that she would desire to rule over her husband. In my experience, there are few things that women enjoy more or are more attracted to, than harnessing the power of their man for something. Unfortunately a lot of times, they harness that power for bad. And it still amazes me how many guys don't see this. Maybe its their mother putting chivalric ideas in their head, and their dad confirming that out of deference to the mother. In any event, a lot of dudes are out there blind as a bat, walking around as bait.
Genius comment. What you wrote in your words actually basically illustrates the whole reality of "Fragile Masculinity", just as such was also depicted in that latest Barbie Movie with "Ken" and his Second Class position with Barbie and living in "Barbieland". The odd thing is that the Men who expend energy trying to prove "Masculinity" rarely have it, and because they expend this energy, when it comes to live and be Masculine, they are found ill-equipped. Real Men need not prove themselves to anyone, and especially not to other Men, but I say that with a grain of caution under the assumption that the Man is truly a Man of his word, is principled and worth his weight in Gold. Otherwise, all of that would go out the window. But surely, playing games, trying to chase Women, trying to make bets about who can drink the most alcohol or down the most hot dogs and other nonsense like that, are for Weak, Unmanly Men. Gym-goers are also very unmanly. Sacrificing their health, pleasure and longevity to maintain a monopoly on their strength, at the cost of having a decent overall life especially as they age and run into many health issues.
What makes women attracted to men is what women by their nature cannot have, namely masculine confidence, energy, charisma, strength, potential, or what the Romans called Vir. Wuhmun can make believe all they want with their careers, wealth, status and everything else traditionally held by men, but women will never, ever possess Vir.
The OP insists on romantic relationships between men and women being dictated by materialism, but that's only a small part of the whole.
Beyond the material is the underlying spiritual and cosmic principle and nature of Vir, which is not fully understood by men and far less so by women, but they both wish to possess it in different ways, either directly in the case of men or through men in the case of women.
Vir gave us the word virtue
I'm sure it is my First Girlfriend!!! "Your such an asshole."
my real question is why does everyone always have such inane interests? why does no one ever talk about geo-strat or interplanitary colonization?
Over their heads
I am struggling to have 1% of the life I want. Maybe once I complete 100% my inane interests I can start building an interplanetary ship.
Those are inane interests.
interplanitary colonization? lol no need for answer, that is an asinine goal
Because it is just mouth noise.
I just took a "reconniscence" road trip. I am now really interested in the Dakotas, Montana and Idaho.
Montana and Idaho are awesome. Old growth forests, lakes surrounded by miles and miles of forest, pretty conservative generally (stay away from Boise), and the weather is great. If you can get out there, do it. Its expensive here in the Pac NW, but if you look around you can find something...especially if you buy raw land and homestead. Best of luck my man! 👍
23:07: women are still pulling tricks today, but they’ve rebranded to Ceiling Fans or Tinder Swindlers.
Guys are putting way too much thought into this. Stop wasting your grey matter.
I don't think Cappy is right about the top 5% or 10%. I would say it's more like the top 40%. Dating app statistics are incredibly misleading. If an average man signed up for Tinder, and had 500 matches within the first day, then those average men would select for the most attractive women also. The majority of women don't even use dating apps. Which is why there's always at least twice as many men on them as women. But luckily for men, the bar is set so low today, that you really don't have to be a Chad to be in the top 40% of men. And I know this is true from personal experience.
Thank you! You've pointed out the obvious-that there are twice as many men on dating apps as women.
To be perfectly honest, should men care that women don't want them? And yet, you have women that claim they're upset that they're not getting attention from men. But then they go back to doing the same damn thing they've always done, once a man shows any sort of interest in them. So men shouldn't even spend a moment's worth of anything for women. They'll just circle back to who they always were, it's not worth the energy.
Thanos: Men can live on an entirely different planet, and their very existence and knowledge of everything man has ever created, will not exist in this reality
Women: **Loud squabblings of protests**
Thanos: 💢SNAP💢
Women: 💩
Some men are gonna care. People get their feelings hurt when they're told they're not wanted. Not only men, but women too. Even women who don't want men get pissed off if you tell them no man wants them. The internet survives on the wailing of rejected women who don't even like men. It's an ego thing. If you try to pat a dog on the head and it runs away, even that's going to hurt an average person's feelings.
We do not need them as well,so where will that take us all
Children of men…? Also rich most affected
great comments
Although this was an admirable attempt at explaining the current situation, I don't think you truly understand w0men and what exactly they're attracted to. You stated that "W0men never liked men that much" and "W0men's attraction to men has been low or a fraction of men's attraction to w0men for all of human history." If those statements were true, then why do chicks go completely bonkers and hysterical when in the presence of a rockstar, a pop star or an A-list actor?
And these aren't a "minority of w0men", by any stretch of the imagination; they fill stadiums. Anyone can see that their attraction level is through the roof. The same thing goes for a typical Chad, albeit on a smaller scale. So it's easily demonstrable that w0men in general are wildly attracted to specific types of men-they're just not attracted to the average man, unfortunately.
With that said, I enjoy your content. Your analysis is usually spot-on and quite entertaining.
They all want Glocktavius Ray Ray Jamal Devontae . And Chadimus Dick Maximus
They want us for the sex and the companionship. it does help if the sex makes their girlfriends jealous.
I found that in other countries, especially 3rd world countries, women will pursue guys that have good jobs and be repulsed by poor men, even if they're bad boys and are good looking chads. It's not that they want these chads but are practically choosing more well off albeit beta males, it's that they are repulsed by them.
Where do you see this and what's your explanation?
@@adisc7475 In Arab countries, specifically Egypt since I saw it there first hand all the time. I can't explain women's rational since I'm not a woman. But here's what it might be:
1) If you're an engineer, doctor, i.e work a good job, you'll exhibit certain behaviors and confidence that even Tyrones from the ghetto won't. Assuming that you're not socially retarded and physically repulsive, a good job means you have options when it comes to marriage unlike the US. Don't get me wrong, looks still matter and a handsome engineer will win out over an ugly one. But an ugly engineer will overall still win over a handsome electrician (which is a low class job there).
2) Social class is a much bigger thing over there.
3) Another thing is that if you have a good job, you don't need to have much game (just basic social skills). Since you're already high status, girls will gravitate towards you regardless of game.
4) Dating here is way simpler. Choose the girl. Ask her dad for her hand in marriage. If the dad and daughter agree, get engaged. Get married.
5) Bad boy behavior isn't attractive to most women here unless the women are from the ghetto. It's all about having a good job and taking care of your woman.
6) Girls being 304s and sleeping around is seen as repugnant and disgusting behavior. When girls there say they're virgins, they're not joking. Almost all of them are. Slut behavior will bring shame to the family and sometimes may lead to the girl being disowned or killed.
Overall, I don't think female nature has changed. It's just that girls there value different things. Social status in the West, at least regarding sexual marketplace value, is monopolized by bad boys and thugs. Whereas sexual marketplace value in Egypt gives value to a good job and responsibility (it's hard to believe but no joke). Also, the courtship/dating culture here hasn't been ruined yet by what's going on in the west.
I think women used to do the same in America. Women used to need men, and they don't anymore. At least not... A man. Women can provide for themselves financially, so now they go after the men who are more attractive and the bad boys. Women in poor countries are focused on their survival. Women in Western countries are focused on which men give them the fuzzy wuzzies.
Don't get it twisted, because you basically gave the answer away in your comment and observation that proves that the 3rd worlders only want you for your money and are repulsed if you don't have it. Now, why do you think that is!? Women who are attracted to you on the basis of your job, only care about money and you being a provider and nesting plan for them to have children. Especially the whole notion of if a guy is a Lawyer, Doctor or Engineer. The "esteem" in those positions comes from typically Backwater countries, especially ones who lived through Communism and are largely undeveloped, where they were programmed to believe that the only valuable Men became Lawyers, Doctors and Engineers. If you land one of those girls on your laps, you are in a SORE spot of total disappointment and have no clue what kind of an empty soul you've embarked upon. Sure, she'll sex you up. She'll even cook and clean for you, iron your clothes. But all the fun ends there. In most cases, they also have a long-term boyfriend or husband who they really are with, of their own ethnicity, behind the scenes.
Let's cut through all the bullshit and tell it like it is:
1. Men enjoy sex much more than women.
2. Women resent this like hell.
It's REALLY That simple!
I‘m sorry, I‘ve witnessed how horny women can be. That‘s just not true, at least not for all of them.
@@rudi5139that rarely occurs when marriage is involved.
For years most of the guys in the manuscript have bitched about feminism
I love the you're such an asshole into 🔥
With jews you lose cappy
Can’t beat em? Join em.