This Can Change REMOTE ID For Ever
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 янв 2025
- 🙋🏼♂ Have Questions , Need Help Fixing, Troubleshooting, or Learning More about FPV?
Join 'The Hangar' 🛩 my members only community - you get:
💰 Affiliate Program
🎁 Members Giveaways & Promotions
🎓 All my existing & new Courses
🧰 All my workshops (live & replays)
🧑🎓 All my Tutorials
📋 All my Guides
📺 All my Videos Add Free
🎬 Directors Cut Videos
⏰ Bench Time Live Hangouts
🤝 1:1 Help/Support
‣ Go to DarrenFPV.com to join or learn more
🔗 www.darrenfpv....
If you feel like building a 5" Freestyle Drone is too hard, you just need the right guidance.
So, I built a course with 71 highly detailed but simple modules, breaking down absolutely everything! They're can't be anything missing, if there is, I will add it. If Digital Video Transmitters on Drones were to become Remote ID Broadcast Modules it would have Huge Implications on EVERY Pilot. DJI currently do it this way with the DJI Avata, so Caddx Walksnail could easily implement Remote ID the same way. It makes it easier for companies like iFlight, GepRC, Diatone and anyone who sells Pre-Built FPV Drones or Bind & Fly FPV Drones to comply with Standard Remote ID. But it also creates a HUGE problem for those who simply want to ignore it.
🙋🏼♂ Have Questions , Need Help Fixing, Troubleshooting, or Learning More about FPV?
Join 'The Hangar' 🛩 my members only community - you get:
💰 Affiliate Program
🎁 Members Giveaways & Promotions
🎓 All my existing & new Courses
🧰 All my workshops (live & replays)
🧑🎓 All my Tutorials
📋 All my Guides
📺 All my Videos Add Free
🎬 Directors Cut Videos
⏰ Bench Time Live Hangouts
🤝 1:1 Help/Support
‣ Go to DarrenFPV.com to join or learn more
🔗 www.darrenfpv.com/the-hangar
So to sum up this whole situation in a single phrase: *_ANALOG FOR THE WIN_* 😀
No Bruce. Line of Sight for the win. 😂
Screw analog….
I still have my analog gear I'm good
@@jtroutt19 Haha... *real men* fly analog, girls (and Ron) fly digital 🙂
Your PM couldn’t answer “what is a women” so I doubt flying analog would make you a man.
On one hand it could be possible that companies could resort to a plug and play quads then sell a receiver with a connector to get around standard remote ID, kinda like Diatone did back in the day. But there's still no confirmation from the FAA in regards to how much needs to be self built. But I'd be guessing that binding a receiver, setting up a flight controller, ie modes tab of betaflight, sourcing a battery and putting the props on would probably be enough to keep the FAA happy that it's partly homebuilt as it can't fly without those steps.
When it comes to Betaflight and remote ID, it wouldn't pass any FAA or EASA certification due to being open source. A fair chunk of the cost of certified equipment/hardware goes towards that certification process and maintaining that Airworthiness iirc from my Diploma of Aeronautical Engineering days.
Everyone says “plug and play” is the solution to get around standard remote id.
I just don’t believe it based on how strict the regs are written.
You’d probably be closer with a “kit” where you’d have to plug in the flight controller to the ESC, then plug in the VTX and receiver cables to the FC.
But the thing I don’t see with that is, people will just resort to things like the DJI FPV or Avata; so BnF manufacturers won’t want to give up revenue by making it harder than it already is for consumers to get flying with their products.
iFlight are selling RTF kits for the Nazgûl with DJI Goggles and Remote. So they’re going right toe to toe with DJI, and they will need to comply.
BF doesn’t need to pass certification under the regs for Module. It’s only the module that needs to pass certification.
On BnF’s a closed fork of BF would be enough for the UAS to get certified anyway.
Learn to Build a 5" Freestyle FPV Drone 🎓 www.darrenfpv.com/buildmasterclass-5freestyle
And what's even more sad... some "quite respectable" FPV RUclipsrs are trying to diss all this and some even calling people like you warning us all, as "tinfoil warriors". It's pathetic, sheep will always allow these things to happen. World has became nothing but sh1thole.
If you are referring to Mads Tech. The way Ian presents information is “this is what we know, this is what we don’t know”. He doesn’t do speculation, and simply states the facts as he knows them at the present moment.
There is nothing wrong with that approach at all. But saying “no need for tin foil hats”, when he’s knows the technical details of all the hardware (O3 / Walksnail) is capable of becoming a RID Broadcast, which it is in the Avata, is like seeing a hazard 100m up the road and not acknowledging it because it’s not 10m in front of you. Does the hazard clear by the time you get to it, maybe, but the law isn’t going to change by the time you get to the hazard.
Is this a warning, no. This is how it could be done in a way that’s beneficial for everyone. The last thing we all need is to add $50 for a RID module to every build.
Having a VTX as a broadcast module is a good implementation. Then using a phone to jailbreak it to fly anyway, solves the problem for everyone. Keeps everyone happy.
@@DarrenAllatt - all true, but there must be a better way of regulating everything and in the same time making everyone happy. At least they could be more open about what they're aiming at really, not just what they're explaining to us... but what's really behind all this.
Well the FPV Freedom Coalition are pushing for the weight limit to be upped to 1kg so that would exclude practically all re-creation.
IMO personally, I think the faa should start slowing down. It was reasonable to expect people to get licensed, but even then, the content is maybe a bit much for your average consumer, but it's getting more tedious and expensive.
Agreed!
The DJI Mavic Pro has remote I.D. built in. You can switch it on or off in the DJI Go 4 App.
I’m in the U.K. so we don’t have to switch it on.
Came over to you from Xjet's search suggestion. I've liked, and scrolled to the end for the algorythm, but I'll watch you again fully - later. I fail to see how this i/d system can be implemented, because our club flying site in the middle of nowhere in Cheshire, UK, has very poor - if any - mobile signal!
I’d be more surprised that you get good enough weather to fly in Cheshire UK let alone mobile reception 😉
In short, the VTX broadcasts the message, how they pick it up is not dependent on mobile reception
@@DarrenAllatt You don't have a very good impression of the Cheshire weather, then! Right now it is 28C, sunny, with a light breeze of 5kts from the West!- - - The version I saw being shoved at us requires a cellphone and gps connection, before the model is allowed to leave the ground. I'm not sure if that was just the DJI stuff, or all models. And, where we are, nobody is going to bother to come and checkif we have CAA numbers, or any other unnecessary gadgets on our kit!
Stock up on high powered analog vtxs now
What’s if I want to put an o3 airnunit in an rc car or even a sub 250 gram quad? You think DJI is going to force remote ID in those situations where it’s not even required by regulations?
In my research I couldn’t find anything written for an exemption of RID on Sub 250grams.
There seems to be a belief that if registration is required, then RID is required and Sub250 doesn’t require registration.
It’s not just DJI, I think your VTX (regardless of who makes it) will become your remote ID broadcast module.
The Regs require broadcast modules to enforce compliance and prevent take off.
How they differentiate Sub250 or ground vehicles from 251g+ builds I don’t know.
Manufacturers have to take steps to ensure they dont end up in the firing line from the US Gov.
I honestly don’t know what they may do, and i would have to think about how they could solve it.
Does O3 now have remote id support?
If you have an Avatar it does
Like all things FAA, I find the "standard Remote ID drones" vs "drones with Remote ID broadcast module" graphics confusing. "Standard" must broadcast "control station location and elevation" and "drones with Remote ID broadcast module" must broadcast "takeoff location and elevation". I know there are technical differences, but why don't they say "standard remote ID drones must maintain real-time control station location data"? I contacted Horizon Hobbies (Spektrum) about their newly-announced Remote ID module, and could not get a straight answer from them about whether their future control systems would have Remote ID built in, or whether the FAA mandated that as they seem to have done with DJI. Per the FAA, proper drones (like DJI) and model aircraft such as fixed-wing airplanes are both called "drones".
Doubtful IMO. The flight controller for standard remoteid still needs to be aware of the RID module and prevent take off for instance if there's an issue with the module. It would still take coordination with the opensource firmware teams that build betaflight, inav and ardupilot to make a standard remote id solution.
Thanks for the response Ken.
The code to prevent take off already exists in BF. If you have GPS rescue enabled, unless the defined minimum number of satelites has been reached, BF prevents the UAS from arming for takeoff. So for Standard Remote ID, a closed-fork, could utilise a modified part of that code that if the remote id module doesn't provide a "Remote ID Compliance = True" state to FC running the 'closed fork of BF' then the Quad wouldn't arm.
If the RID Module was also the VTX, then withholding video could also be enough to 'prevent take-off'.
But it could mean BF have to do some work to make it happen.
Good point that they obviously didnt consider which would hinder the pilot. I understand it being for safety and all I get it but what actually happens when this malfunctions and im sure it will at some point. Are we forced into buying backup mods for reinforcement?? This could be and will be at some point a blockage of epic shots.
Tyranny.
Exactly, and that is what all this is about! Governments are by far the biggest criminals in every single country, period.
Soooo. Forgive my ignorance. But, currently, to fly a BNF quad which is fitted with an 03 air unit using the DJI Goggles 2 you first need to connect the goggle to your phone to activate the remote ID? If so, is that only the case in EASA and FAA regulated airspace? I had presumed that was only necessary for DJI drones. I am planning to buy a BNF very soon and tossing up which goggles to go for. This is an interesting dillema...
Currently. No. Right now you don’t need to turn on Remote ID on a BnF and there is no current way to enable remote ID on a BnF using an O3 Air Unit or any Digital VTX
As a brand new Avata owner living in Texas, using Goggles 2, I can tell you that my Avata's props would not even start spinning until I plugged my iPhone into my goggles. All I got was a "Remote ID error." I was not happy when I discovered this. "How many devices do I need hanging off my body to fly this thing?!," I fumed. I still haven't figured out a safe place to store the goggle's battery so that it doesn't fall and pull loose from the goggles while I'm flying. The pure joy of flying the thing does help to make up for the frustration, though. I'm not against appropriate regulation when needed to keep everyone safe, especially as the number of drones increases day by day, so I'm not complaining about that like so many others who feel the FAA is overreaching, or Remote ID is some kind of plot by Amazon to take over Class G airspace. I'm just saying that, right now, the Goggles 2 does not manage the devices (battery + iPhone) in a safe and tidy manner. They should provide some kind of holder for them so they cannot become detached.
So when is the FAA going to start processing FRIAs
Not like it'll really matter. They're going to be so sparse and they're going to process them so slowly that they basically won't exist.
You are correct, but if you do not want to comply with RID, keep you old hardware, because in the future will not be available at all, because the product, at least in the united states will not be in compliance, and all the new products like we see now, like the dji 03 does comply, easy. The issue is for rc aircraft, the drone is a limited market, the rc aircraft is a big market, and to buy a extensive amount of modules for each aircraft is big investment, so the price may come down. Maybe the new receivers will have a broadcast capabilities who know! but in the near future or we comply or a Karen will call the police on you. Is always the case. We just need to adjust to the new Karen times.
F the Karen’s f the commies
im new to this so forgive me. other than locating pilots location whats the other reasons ? will they issue fines for hieght ? or distance ? im just doing laps around my house but i do send that dji fpv up super high?
Im sure thats the ultimate end goal yeah.. Basically to control drones like a plane and there will definitely eventually be a height limit. There's already a LOS rule so you cant really go far and say you can still see it. Remote ID isnt going to be the end of the world, but its going to be the end of diy fpv drones just being able to Arm & Takeoff wherever and whenever if you want to run a Digital Video system it seems like.
I mean they cant really regulate a freestyle drone that has no gps and is running an analog camera with an aftermarket radio like Frsky or something. But now that most if not all the other drones in the sky are easily checked for their data and owners and then they see some drones that arent broadcasting Remote ID and the video gets on youtube, etc somehow. They could potentially go after the drone pilots after the fact for breaking regulations.
Its just a bad mess all around really and its a shame that the O3 Air Unit, being so good, will deff eventually be GPS locked down like the DJI camera drones and also if you happen to be close by to something and be in NFZ's..
The Ultimate goal is to allow for Commercial UAV’s / Drones to operate for things like delivery and all other kinds of commercial uses.
Knowing where another drone is flying prevents issues, like mid airs or being blown out when someone plugs in.
I unlocked my dji fpv no more (no fly zones or alt limits)
I'm still flying vista units, and analog on whoops. Will likely pickup hdzero goggles in the near future but really just want hd quality on a whoop.and it still fly like a tiny whoop. For now I think a pinch cam is almost as good as any digital system on a whoop for the price
If you are going HDZ Goggles, maybe grab walksnail when to gradually replace your vista's because they have a VRX that you can use on your HDZ Goggles
Anyone heard if the FAA in the US is considering a raise in the weight limit above 250g before requiring remote ID? I know it was presented to them.
That ain't happening, they just announced that now any drone that leaves the air has to have remote id now, even sub 250
Hey am I able to use other dji cameras with the dji air unit 3 like the runcam wasp or nebula pro or pheonix cam and if I am able to switch the camera is it possible to change it quickly while I'm already out flying if I have 2 different cameras? Also which dji camera has the best low light feed while still having good resolution/picture?
No. Those other cameras are only compatible with the DJI FPV SYSTEM (Link, Vista) not O3 Air Unit.
If you want low light, I would use the Caddx Polar on the Vista or Link
Super informative vid mate!! great stuff!
Thanks Gareth! Glad you liked it!
no its not its click bait he doesnt have any information
@@420247paul well watch the whole video Paul… if having a Digital VTX become a broadcast module through a firmware update doesn’t change remote id, then what does?
Do you think DJI will force remote ID compliance with there O3 Air Unit (that's not in prebuilds)?
Not sure, but i feel like it has a high probability of occurring
@@DarrenAllatt ok, thank you for your help. Would the o3 be good for beginners?
@@crazylolsbg yes, it’s great for beginners. And it’s highly unlikely DJI would force rid on o3s as they have no requirement to nor do they know the weight of the quad it’s going in or if rid is required on the device the o3 is attached to. Heck, you could mount one on your bicycle if you wanted. It’s just a part. A component. There’s no burden on DJI to do anything more than follow fcc regulations for rf signal compliance and interference levels as far as I know.
@@SkeezyFPV that's true. never thought of that.
Arn't drones under 250 gms exempt, or is the RID requirement under 250 compliance just for factory built drones ? If you build your own under 250 gms are you still required to have RID ?
All drones are to have Remote ID regardless.
We are pushing to up the limit to 1kg in faa re auth act of 2023. This would exempt most recreational pilots from the faa over reach and over regulation. 250g was far too low and the FAA being straight up tyrants.
Would love that to get through!
I love how many people in various discord servers are calling you a tinfoil hat wearer and fear monger for stating the obvious upgrade path towards RID compliance with O3, or trying to argue that 'it'll never happen'. I don't think they'll have a separate branch for O3 in a DIY builds, you want DJI's O3 in your DIY build? You'll have to have GPS on the quad, and your goggles be either the Intrgra or goggles 2 with the dji fly app to use O3. The only way around all that would be not to upgrade the firmware on your existing O3 at all, comply with all the requirements, or have the community playing cat and mouse with downgrade methods.
The saving grace seems to be getting the weight limit increased to 1kg instead of the 250g limit thus negating RID all together.
If people want to call me names, it means a few things:
a) They have nothing to discuss on the topic itself that warrants merit. If you can’t debate the information / hypothesis put forward, but resort to name calling it means you can’t actually debate the topic.
b) speaks volumes about the qualities and character of the person doing the name calling.
But it’s not just O3, it will be all digital VTX’s.
I do think they can do a seperate branch for DIY, it’s relatively easy. Just a slight difference in the boot loader.
The “don’t upgrade” route doesn’t work with DJI, because they have “firmware mismatch” errors on the Avata already.
Simple solution is a jailbreak app on your phone to say you are in a FRIA, that unlocks the video feed on the goggles.
@@DarrenAllatt You're on the right track with the potential for O3 RID compliance. It's either O3 RID built in or a separate module, wiring, setup, weight I know is a big one. I know these same people try to argue, 'well, what about indoors, what about sub 250g'. It's like I'm not an engineer so I'll leave that to DJI to figure out how they figure indoor and sub 250g. These same people seem to be convinced that we'll 100% win the change to 1kg and negate the need at all for RID. I'd love to see 1kg, but I'm not 100% sure.
Right?! These people are living under a Rock or don’t know how DJI operates lol.. If it becomes required they already prepared for that on the Hardware side and they’ll just force an update to be in compliance and that’s that.
Its really that simple and to think that it cant or wont happen is just wishful thinking at this point I think unfortunately..
They put RID hardware inside the O3 air unit for a reason, bc they knew it was a strong possibility of being made a law. That way like someone said above, they can make way for their multibillion dollar company’s delivery drones.
You think they care if you can fly your drone or not when they can be making money lol
@@mxracingunlimitedltd7784 DJI had two representatives on the panel that developed the technical requirements for remote ID. They are well ahead of the curve and it’ll be for other companies like Caddx and HDZero to play catch up
@@mxracingunlimitedltd7784 it’s also not that they put RID hardware in it, it’s that the base hardware to make a VTX can be reprogrammed through software, which is what they did for the Avata
Does it address anything for Rec pilots under 250g who don’t even have to register drones?
That’s an edge case that I don’t know how to solve at the moment and will have to think about how they can do it.
Do the iflight quads have remote id
No Hobby-Grade FPV Drones, including iFlight have Remote ID at the moment.
However, through a firmware update to the DJI O3 Air Unit or any Digital VTX, it would enable Remote ID on them.
So I shouldn't get into fpv now? I want to get into fpv.
Yes you should get into FPV now.
What about r/c planes, helis, gliders, vtols, etc?
They all have to comply with RID
@@DarrenAllatt New R/C planes from HorizonHobby currently have no RID solution. Spektrum has no RID solution to go along with their GSM receiver.
@@WA4OSH
It's a grey area for retailers.
Here is the part of the law:
"§ 89.510 Production requirements for unmanned aircraft produced ...
After September 16, 2022, no person may produce an unmanned aircraft for operation in the airspace of the United States ... unless:
(a) All applicable requirements of part 21 of this chapter are met; and
(b) The unmanned aircraft is -
(1) Designed and produced to meet the minimum performance requirements for standard remote identification unmanned aircraft established in § 89.310 in accordance with an FAA-accepted means of compliance;"
So this basically says, if you want to produce UAS to the flown in the USA, you have to meet standard Remote ID.
Here is the kicker though, in the final rule it states:
"The FAA also considers that any kit containing all the parts and instructions necessary to assemble a UAS would meet this definition. As further explained in section XIV.B.2 of this
preamble, producers of complete kits offered for sale are subject to the production requirements
of this rule"
So if we have no intention of following remote ID we won't have to?
No, you will probably have to find a jailbreak like how there are jailbreaks for DJI Geofencing.
Probably stay on your current firmware or use downgrade methods.
Thanks, you’ve obviously done your homework
🕵️♂️
Nice video, 2 thumps up.
Thank you!
keep up the thumbnails theyre funny af
Will do
The FAA has zero jurisdiction over betaflight.
While FAA can't enforce BF directly, it's indirect enforcement that will cause BF to have to solve compliance.
The laws are written in a way so the FAA can enforce compliance through Sellers and Manufacturers. So if BF doesn't have a solution, then Sellers & Manufacturers will be forced to find solutions that enable compliance - which would mean making their own Flight Control Firmware, which is not what BF wants. So this indirectly forces them to solve the issue of compliance.
So... maybe I'm missing something but are you aware that you also need GPS to be able to broadcast the location of anything? The O3 Air Units do not have Onboard GPS.
I doubt very highly that DJI will ever be compelled to force end users to install Remote ID on Air Units. Because they have no way of knowing what the end user will install the unit in, they have plausible deniability. Which frankly is all most corporations want to have... They don't care if you comply or not as long as it doesn't affect their bottom line.
Correct they don’t have onboard GPS, but can get the gps data from the flight controller.
The issue is not with DIY, where you or me build an FPV drone.
The issue for DJI is Pre-Built FPV Drones aka Bind & Fly’s which are a major sales channel. They have an incentive to solve the issue for their BnF Company customers.
They don’t want plausible deniability for BnF’s they want revenue and to sell more product.
@Darren Allatt Huh? Flight controllers don't include GPS natively. The actual "solution" is the one that pre-built FPV companies have already adopted... include a GPS module. Then DJI can afford you the option of engaging Remote ID on home builds. As far as the pre builds go, they will need to comply to be sold in the US. Period. That means that they will need to have GPS installed and a way to get GPS from whichever goggles you use. It doesn't matter who makes them. It doesn't matter which transmission system they use. None of that matters. If it is pre-built, flies and weighs over 250g, it is required to have built in Remote ID. In September, every single drone/ rc aircraft will be required to have Remote ID. Whether or not people choose to comply is up to them.
Yes I am aware of that, which is exactly what I cover in this video. So not sure how much of it you actually watched?
The technical solution for Pre-Built Drones to have a GPS Unit, the telemetry of which on the Flight Controller is read by the Digital VTX (O3, WS) which then Broadcasts a Remote ID Message. The Digital VTX is capable of receiving the GPS Location of the Pilot through the Goggles (DJI & WS transmit from Goggles to Air Unit), which is required to be inlcuded in the RID message. Goggles Integra have integrated GPS, so that data will likely be included in the Goggles Transmittion to the Air Unit. Goggles 2 for the AVATA use the GPS location in the DJI App connected via USB, so WS could also adopt this approach as well.
If you look at the Regs for Pre-Builds, basically they are so tight unless you purchase all the parts individually all other situations are considered a pre-build.
@Darren Allatt Yes the jump cuts to different areas of your apartment made me lose focus. I would have sworn you said they can get GPS data from the flight controller... my bad.
Hey did you see the video of the American RUclips drone guy going over European drone laws and regulations and then arguing with an actual American pilot and license holder? No? That's probably because we don't care about European drone regulations and laws. Hahaha!
In all seriousness, Remote ID isn't that big of a deal. There's little to no enforcement behind it... We literally have a guy now that has been fined $182,000 and hasn't paid a single dime in around 2 years. Still making videos blatantly breaking the rules and yelling "F the FAA!" We'll see but I'm not gonna worry until there's something to worry about.
Take a close look at this bill: s.157 Drone Act of 2023. Section on tampering with RID
🤯
there is a hack for everything right
Pretty much!
Nice. I like the video. Also, what a fucking mess.. Thanks U.S. fed gov for once again complicating shit in the name of "safety."
It’s actually about creating the infrastructure for commercial uavs to operate in residential space.
@@DarrenAllatt The "quotes" meant I was being sarcastic.
@@DarrenAllatt The problem is that they will lie about it, and dumb people will believe it's a safety thing. It's a shame.
@@mikebergman1817 oh lol. Sorry
@@DarrenAllatt Haha no worries
This is being done at the behest of the Chinese Govt so that the Russian military can see and target Ukrainian drone teams. These small teams have been wreaking havoc on Russian troops and have been extremely difficult to locate and track.
No that's incorrect - it's so the Avata can be sold in the USA as it needs to comply with RID laws.
LIKE and Comment ALL THE REMOTE ID VIDEOS YOU SEE! Make RUclips push it out to everyone!
That’s not going to make RUclips push out the video. It will actually have the opposite effect.
Likes and comments don’t have much affect on whether RUclips pushes the video
Watching every video from end to end without skipping will have more impact, than just clicking on a video - liking, commenting and moving to the next one.
@@DarrenAllatt I do watch fully the ones that the content is appropriate and works in a positive direction, which is what this should be about. I assure you, the grain of salt was noted.
who is master?
who is slave?
is government (gangs of men and women) master and the people slaves?
DO NOT SUBMIT TO MADMEN
There's an awful lot of post processing on your voice. It's kinda messing with me.
Honestly though, I highly doubt that these rules will actually make much difference in the long run. There's the matter of us using antennas that are tuned for 5.8GHz. It's pretty doubtful that RID is going to get any range when it seems that they're targeting 2.4GHz. As for the flight controllers, I imagine that they're going to have a heck of a time forcing closed source firmware onto them. They're not actually that complicated, and we'll likely be able to bypass any kind of tamper protection that's in place with a little soldering. I'll believe they can stiff arm us when I see it.
The Antenna on O3 is dual 5.8 and 2.4, and you can use 5.8 to broadcast an RID message.
What they have worked out is you can't enforce the pilots or end users - they can't police us all individually. But what they have worked out, is you can police & enforce the 10-20 companies that sell Pre-Built Drones in the USA
My solution is to just keep the AUW of the drone below 250 grams, fly solely and purely just for fun under the Recreational Exemption. Otherwise, just deal with Remote ID. It is here, It will likely stay.
What’s wrong with your mic? Is it just me?
No. I was messing around with the Audio. Have been trying to sort that out
Man, Darren, your words are all Greek to me. Anybody got a dictionary?
What words are Greek and I’ll translate for you καταλαβαίνεις?
Just another reason not to buy this crap.
1st comment
Enjoy your DJI paperweights