So does the Zeta function. If you can predict primes you will basically be able to hack a lot of passwords on the internet, because they often rely on primes for encryption.
”first integers” should be replaced with “first positive integers” or talk about natural numbers. Given that there are countably infinite negative integers, it doesn’t make sense to say “the first 1000 integers” but rather “the first 1000 POSITIVE integers”
Here is an ontological premise that ive been developing based geometric and philosophical axioms. It follows: Below is a geometric paradigm of emanation. Before the beginning the One Is. ---This is Absolute Transcendent Reality. Monad In the beginning there is One.---This is Perfection, the Principle, The model for everything that is posterior. The One becomes 2 and remains One---This is The Ineffable Emenation/Powerthe fibonacci sequence startes like this. 1. 1. 2. 3. 5 ....... why 1. 1. and not 0 1... Because something cannot come from nothing and because 'nothing' does not exist(by definition). The first 1 is monad... all of existence as one thing, unmanifest 1 pure in the highest sense. The second one is the principle of self-similarity and is a perfect representation of the one as unmanifest potential. 2 is the manifestation of space/time. point.. line.. but is also a reflection 1 containing in it the essence and potential of 1. 3 is energy/matter manifest but unseen. 4 is the observed world, unreal and not in the fibonacci sequence. 5 is 1 and starts the spiral over The 2 becomes 3 and remains One ---This is Form ie substance/matter. Existence The 3 becomes 5 and remains One --.... An aggregation of multiplicity into Bieng... having 4 iterations, like the tetractus (10 is complete at 4) Thus coming back around the logarithmic spiral. The 5 becomes 8 and remains One. The 8 becomea 13.. 21..34..55..89..144.... and remains One In this way there is a Proportionality, Intrinsic Unity, and Harmony throughout All things that can be said to exist; allowing for Diifference(multiplicity) whilst preserving the Intrinsic Unity.
why is 'the natural logarithm of x' being vocalized as "Lon X"? I looooooooooooooooove this topic. the info is well-presented. but I swear - - math people talk weird sometimes.
Misiec´s conjecture: Let x= 1/n*n^(1/2+n*2i) if n is a prime number then the sin(x)=x, and if not the number is not a prime number. unfortunately this conjecture is only true when considering the limit of the derivative of the imaginary prime for n and in a graph of real vs imaginary component. but it remains true only for prime numbers in its imaginary component or better the limit of its component to the imaginary
Going beyond a certain region is equivelant to moving into a different region, so here are the possibilities for the region you would be going into. If your region is bounded at both ends then you could happen to choose a region with no primes. For example the region of size 3 bounded by 19
(Observational conjecture): Pi might be called "two-ness" because it is an actual ratio of separation from one-ness prime and duality, rationally, and the natural logarithm reverses the process, continuously. The therom superimposed the forward and reverse process of coordinated connection. (?) IMO I'm a total amateur but there seems to be millions of actual Mathematicians who could make a generalization of the idea? Ie, because primes and integers form related islands of consistency in a universe of natural logarithmic continuity, then there's a mathematical format for an hierarchical sequence of related constants (?) = "things as they are maybe"?
Great video, except you should not pronounce ln(x) as 'lawn x'. Nobody ever calls it that. It's 'the natural log of x'. Or, once it's understood, just 'log x'. Or L N of x..
So what? What is the use of knowing how many prime numbers exist? I am not saying it is useless, but if this theory is useful at all it is better to mention it in the video.
unlike common people who just care for 'use' of anything and everything...exploiting freaks...mathematicians see beauty in what they do and their work needs no reason for being done its done just for the sake of doinh
If I give you ‘x’ say no of divisor and ‘k’ say no of prime number then can you tell me is it possible to find number having exactly x divisors and k of them are prime. My question is i have not need that number just can you tell me yes or no weather possible a number. How to approach this problem. I am in trouble after scratching head for 2 days I can’t figure out it plz help :)
The new finds in the field of prime numbers. The prime numbers form so-called nests of the prime numbers in the fourth dimensions. Please see the homepage www.number-galaxy.eu in the directory "news" and positions: 01.01.2020 3D bordered prime magic squares in world and antiworld configuration 03.02.2021 Projection 3D bordered prime magic squares on critical linie of Riemann zeta-function. This is completely new in the field of the Riemann hypothesis.
There is a very interesting recent research book that have miraculously answered almost all the questions concerning Prime numbers, it is available on Amazon by the name of: THE FORMULAS OF NONPRIMES REVEALING ALL THE PRIME NUMBERS
Good day, may I ask for permission to get some screenshots of your video tutorial on Prime Number Theory? We will just use it for our presentation about History and Philosophy of Mathematics.
Bruh, *logarithmic* spiral, not golden spiral. He even says so. The golden spiral is a special case. I repeat, it’s only a SPECIAL CASE. A quote about galactic spirals from ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/STRUCTURE/spst.html: “Pitch angles in different galaxies vary between a few and about 30°” Pitch angle of the golden spiral is ~17° A quote about nautilus shells from sites.millersville.edu/rumble/Math.457/nautilus.pdf “… the spirals of these shells could be inscribed within rectangles with sides in the ratio of about 1.33…” So not 1.68… So far, flowers are the only place where these golden spirals appear.
TheIdealGod In case my intentions didn't come through in my post, I was being ironic. I believe the universe was created by God. Given this incredible regularity in math and science, and our ability to understand it, it is unlikely the universe came about through "chance."
![Quando Rondo - Life Goes On [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eIf3fhMXAow/mqdefault.jpg)
1:53 "of the first 1000 integers we find 1229 primes"
*what*
True, he said '1,000' but I think he meant to say '10,000' which is also displayed within the video. Good catch, though.
Lol didnt catch that casue i say the 10,000 written made sense... Lol primes be doing magic for real
this video should be nominated for oscar
Absolutely!
This is absolutely amazing!!
This needs more attention.
So does the Zeta function. If you can predict primes you will basically be able to hack a lot of passwords on the internet, because they often rely on primes for encryption.
It's literally called the prime number theorem....
”first integers” should be replaced with “first positive integers” or talk about natural numbers. Given that there are countably infinite negative integers, it doesn’t make sense to say “the first 1000 integers” but rather “the first 1000 POSITIVE integers”
Very clear explanations! Thanks!
Here is an ontological premise that ive been developing based geometric and philosophical axioms.
It follows:
Below is a geometric paradigm of emanation.
Before the beginning the One Is. ---This is Absolute Transcendent Reality. Monad
In the beginning there is One.---This is Perfection, the Principle, The model for everything that is posterior.
The One becomes 2 and remains One---This is The Ineffable Emenation/Powerthe fibonacci sequence startes like this. 1. 1. 2. 3. 5
....... why 1. 1. and not 0 1...
Because something cannot come from nothing and because 'nothing' does not exist(by definition). The first 1 is monad... all of existence as one thing, unmanifest 1 pure in the highest sense.
The second one is the principle of self-similarity and is a perfect representation of the one as unmanifest potential.
2 is the manifestation of space/time. point.. line.. but is also a reflection 1 containing in it the essence and potential of 1.
3 is energy/matter manifest but unseen.
4 is the observed world, unreal and not in the fibonacci sequence.
5 is 1 and starts the spiral over
The 2 becomes 3 and remains One ---This is Form ie substance/matter. Existence
The 3 becomes 5 and remains One --.... An aggregation of multiplicity into Bieng...
having 4 iterations, like the tetractus
(10 is complete at 4)
Thus coming back around the logarithmic spiral.
The 5 becomes 8 and remains One.
The 8 becomea 13.. 21..34..55..89..144.... and remains One
In this way there is a Proportionality, Intrinsic Unity, and Harmony throughout All things that can be said to exist; allowing for Diifference(multiplicity) whilst preserving the Intrinsic Unity.
why is 'the natural logarithm of x' being vocalized as "Lon X"?
I looooooooooooooooove this topic. the info is well-presented.
but I swear - - math people talk weird sometimes.
Log natural = lon
I've literally never heard it said as 'Lon x' or 'Lin x'. I think I've only ever heard it said as 'natural log of x' or just 'log x'.
Everything simple is beautiful.
Get off my ln()
Thanks
Misiec´s conjecture: Let x= 1/n*n^(1/2+n*2i) if n is a prime number then the sin(x)=x, and if not the number is not a prime number.
Misiec´s conjecture: Let x= 1/n*n^(1/2+n*2i) if n is a prime number then the sin(x)=x, and if not the number is not a prime number. unfortunately this conjecture is only true when considering the limit of the derivative of the imaginary prime for n and in a graph of real vs imaginary component. but it remains true only for prime numbers in its imaginary component or better the limit of its component to the imaginary
Beautiful
Wooow!!! I am seriously in love with maths.
Wow and i thought Bluebrown36 first presented this on RUclips, but turns out this channel 6 years ahead, or really Bluebrown36 is 6 years behind
What is the practical usage of prime numbers and which people made a fortune from those?
I can't believe this vid has only less than 200k views
Wow
Amazing!
Well explained...
At 4:55 I am thinking the true number that it is approaching is pi.
Is there a possibility of prime numbers of getting zero beyond a certain region? As it is decreasing.
I know I'm sounding very stupid
I have the same question
I don't exactly know what you mean, but if you mean that there is a limited number of primes, the answer is no, they're infinite
Going beyond a certain region is equivelant to moving into a different region, so here are the possibilities for the region you would be going into.
If your region is bounded at both ends then you could happen to choose a region with no primes. For example the region of size 3 bounded by 19
Vert good explanation thank you
thank you so much
Thank you, a Lot !
so the spiral of prime numbers logarithmically results in a limit of pi% prime numbers inside any scaling area when the center is 0?
amazing！！
NICEE
Wouldn't this also work for finding how often the number 2 appears in the number line?
Does any 1 know what software generates these charts
very interesting stuff
so convincing
The music of the Prime Numbers, part 4, Solution.
@Y1KU
(Observational conjecture): Pi might be called "two-ness" because it is an actual ratio of separation from one-ness prime and duality, rationally, and the natural logarithm reverses the process, continuously. The therom superimposed the forward and reverse process of coordinated connection. (?) IMO
I'm a total amateur but there seems to be millions of actual Mathematicians who could make a generalization of the idea? Ie, because primes and integers form related islands of consistency in a universe of natural logarithmic continuity, then there's a mathematical format for an hierarchical sequence of related constants (?) = "things as they are maybe"?
English please
Great video, except you should not pronounce ln(x) as 'lawn x'. Nobody ever calls it that. It's 'the natural log of x'. Or, once it's understood, just 'log x'. Or L N of x..
So what? What is the use of knowing how many prime numbers exist? I am not saying it is useless, but if this theory is useful at all it is better to mention it in the video.
It's pure mathematics, so it's pretty but useless (at least in the near future)
I agree its pure maths. But has tremendous implications is cryptogrpahy. Something as simple as making online payments
unlike common people who just care for 'use' of anything and everything...exploiting freaks...mathematicians see beauty in what they do and their work needs no reason for being done its done just for the sake of doinh
Prime numbers are the atoms of math. They build up all the other numbers. There’s a certain beauty to their uniqueness.
Does anyone know what he uses to make those charts?
How did you realize that expansion?
Primzahlensatz von Carl Gauß
But do you know why kids love the taste of cinnamon toast crunch?
Let’s find primes in a methodic way : ruclips.net/video/4DoIpOk88q8/видео.html
Wow, did not learn that even in school. Very interesting...
If I give you ‘x’ say no of divisor and ‘k’ say no of prime number then can you tell me is it possible to find number having exactly x divisors and k of them are prime. My question is i have not need that number just can you tell me yes or no weather possible a number.
How to approach this problem. I am in trouble after scratching head for 2 days I can’t figure out it plz help :)
The equations that define the Prime Number Sequence were found and proven 11 years ago: ruclips.net/video/BDUv0KzjUn4/видео.html
The sine get larger so they will drop like a reverse harmonic. (Lo Janus)
prime number
How can there be a percentage of something infinite as prime nos..
It's a percentage within a bound.
The new finds in the field of prime numbers. The prime numbers form so-called nests of the prime numbers in the fourth dimensions. Please see the homepage www.number-galaxy.eu in the directory "news" and positions:
01.01.2020 3D bordered prime magic squares in world and antiworld configuration
03.02.2021 Projection 3D bordered prime magic squares on critical linie of Riemann zeta-function.
This is completely new in the field of the Riemann hypothesis.
I don't understand
Numbers never end so prime numbers never end.
So why does it slowly drop
Not using a log scale for the plots...
That's a paddlin'
if the result was accurate then we could find any prime knowing how many primes are in some limit
nope... it is not accurate
One trillions is a small scale?
There is a very interesting recent research book that have miraculously answered almost all the questions concerning Prime numbers, it is available on Amazon by the name of: THE FORMULAS OF NONPRIMES REVEALING ALL THE PRIME NUMBERS
Good day, may I ask for permission to get some screenshots of your video tutorial on Prime Number Theory? We will just use it for our presentation about History and Philosophy of Mathematics.
I think that the problem is that at no point is it accurate. Simple?
Amukku dhumukku amal dhumal
진짜 신기하네
I will be posting a video with my equation that will tell you if a
number is prime. the equation has also some other nice benefits.
Thanks everyone.
ln(x) is the natural logarithm of x or simply log of x (not LAWN - my lawn is the grass around my house !!!
Please keep in mind that some people , mostly males , are red green color blind.Hope this helps
Its crazy how the golden ratio shows up everywhere.
That spiral .....awh man !!!!! ....everywhere ....... Even in Monalisa , crab shells , sunflower, fractals ....everywhere !!!
That's the thing that got me, too. Nice video.
Bruh, *logarithmic* spiral, not golden spiral. He even says so. The golden spiral is a special case. I repeat, it’s only a SPECIAL CASE.
A quote about galactic spirals from ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/STRUCTURE/spst.html:
“Pitch angles in different galaxies vary between a few and about 30°”
Pitch angle of the golden spiral is ~17°
A quote about nautilus shells from sites.millersville.edu/rumble/Math.457/nautilus.pdf
“… the spirals of these shells could be inscribed within rectangles with sides in the ratio of about 1.33…”
So not 1.68…
So far, flowers are the only place where these golden spirals appear.
@@RealLifeKyurem understood
And just remember: The universe came about by chance.
How do you know that?
TheIdealGod In case my intentions didn't come through in my post, I was being ironic. I believe the universe was created by God. Given this incredible regularity in math and science, and our ability to understand it, it is unlikely the universe came about through "chance."
wait wtf, how?
I'm scared.
İ don't know but 100 trillion is not a small number. Am i only one who think that
That's 100 billion, chappy
Wow. Laaan x. Nice over-pronunciation...
You made a mistake saying 1229/1000 then showing 1229/10000
I wonder if Jeff bezos knew about this 🤔
What does bezos have to do with this?
bruh why he sayin lawn
Is there a link to a video where the prime number theorem isnt a joke
Stop yelling at me!
is anyone else here because of Seventeen?!
Why? What do they have to do with this?
Is this nonsense? What is the point?