‘My jaw dropped’: Sydney Uni student identifies herself in exam question
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 ноя 2022
- Sydney University Law student Freya Leach has expressed outrage after an assignment question included a character whom she and her peers believe was based on her.
The question in a criminal law assignment included a scenario which described a character identified as ‘Freya’, a right-wing student who has unprotected sex while HIV positive.
“To be vilified in such a graphic way, and for that to be distributed to 400 peers, makes me wonder what is going on,” she told Sky News host Chris Kenny.
Ms Leach said she became aware of this when 20 to 30 of her peers contacted her about the use of her name in the assignment.
“It wasn’t until I opened it on Saturday that my jaw dropped and I realised it was actually me in that assignment."
According to Ms Leach, two characters who also share names with students from the course were mentioned in the exam.
“At worst, it was malicious; at best, it was utterly incompetent.”
This was not only written by someone, but it was read AND approved by other members of the exam board. It's literally a personal attack on particular students. This is deeply, deeply concerning.
Systematic attacks on students. We are gone.
It’s insane
This is hate at a level that requires jail. This could destroy her life!
They cheat. Lie , steal elections. Publically attack people. Destroying America. Complaining is not effective. More direct approach
You need to sue that school until your name is on the front building!
Please sue the entire school it’s outrageous
Is that like Christian schools and unis pulling the same shit? Fcking no one cares you conservatives are coping it because you lot have fcked everyone over for years pay backs a btch hey you sky news tard. Been fine for you lot to push policies of racism and policies that hurt the under privileged, also been fine for you lot to shout your crap on the rooftops get use to copping it because you lot are in for a lot more.
They should be sued AND beaten to a pulp
Laugh my fking ass off
Sue sue sue!
Leftists are totally crazy!!
She really needs to do more than just lodge a formal complaint. There needs to be accountability and reprimand.
Imagine if lawyers start picking clients based on political ideology. Wild times to live in 😲
This law school clearly missed the absolutely essential component of law, justice is blind
justice isn't blind, it's far left. It's SUPPOSED to be blind.
Justice is not blind, it has to be neutral but isn't the moment leftist lawfaring starts. They use it as a propaganda tool and a way to put unjustice to power.
No. The law school didn't miss that essential component. It was turning a blind eye toward the defamation of individual class members.
It's extremely clear that the questions were designed to demonize conservative people, and the fact that they put her very rare name in there shows they wanted to smear her in the process. The West is being destroyed from the inside. Too many CCP "Manchurian Candidates" running the West's education system. Divide and Conquer.
What the f*** does the law have to do with justice?
It's a legal system, not a justice system. It's not been a justice system for decades. There wouldn't be a single serving Justice that ever served in a justice system.
The way she speaks and conducted herself during that interview, sounds like she has more brains than her teacher
Yes. I know a few Uni lecturers. It took me 30 minutes to explain how to use a hose 'snap lock' fitting. I think many modern day lecturers paid for their Phd/degrees on line from Arkansas Uni down in Banjo plucking country!
@William Black your bias is showing.
No, no she isn't.
If there's no other evidence indicating it could be her, other than her first name, then thats only circumstantial evidence. Shes acting like she is definitively certain it was her, and shes supposed to be a law student?
She hasn't got a chance.
@@JoshPhoenix11 The question is clearly a social programming question and not appropriate anyway. Nope...... Lecturer who set the question is not up to scratch and has to go. It is designed to indoctrinate law students.
"Teacher" in universities nowadays means mostly losers who need political activism and socialism to survive
She speaks so well. Freya's definitely going to have a successful career
That is insane. When I was in college, my prof would write questions about her failing marriage in our tests. The class was Psychology of Personalities lmao 😂
lol, no wonder she took the psychology. hope, she is out of that profession now. no offense
@@loendsti Isn't that better than politicizing a question in an exam.
@@esense9602 nope, that shouldn't involve any of that.
@@esense9602 both are bad though why compare?
@@Chillgamesh I mean, if they wrote it themselves of course not but it's a different story if someone with malicious intent and didn't even ask permission.
As a university Professor myself, and having moderated hundreds of exam papers at other institutions worldwide, I have no doubt there was malicious intent behind this. None of the observations presented by Freya, in such an articulate manner, are justifiable and the academics behind this (definitely more than one) must be held to account. Our universities really are in crisis.
Interesting. How exactly are exams typically made and screened? Are these scenarios created manually, and is there some sort of system that changes the minor details?
I don't quite know what to make of this...
it was a politically motivated attack. the school will probably protect the student who is probably a family member of one of the faculty and take the brunt of the lawsuit instead, meaning higher tuitions.
I could see that the names might be a coincidence - peers would not be expected to see malicious name use(but why not use "fictional" names such as "S. Peeder". Politics in the way presented can not be justified though. Especially the lazy political stereotyping.
It's about political standing having Anything to do with Criminal Law. That is the injustice.
I want to know how university teaching staff can get such personal information, and think they can flippantly throw it back on a student, or anyone for that matter, without being noticed or without consequences. My guess is that improprieties were committed possibly by a jealous classmate, and/or hacking of computer or phone. A deep investigation needs to begin to check into the misdeeds of a malignant person(s). Would-be attorney, sue their _$$e$. ⚖️
The fact that professors are teaching students that people's political leanings are relevant to legal cases should serve as a warning about where the legal system is heading.
"Heading"? I believe that we have passed that intersection long ago!
Fckin Right
It's more passive indoctrination and targeting and this looks very targeted and looks very purposely done. This could've have been targeting on purpose and when the markers go through the exams they are given hints as to who to fail with the names in the clues
Look at the Pell appeal in Victoria .
That is not what is being taught in this exam. The fact that this student either couldn't, or wouldn't, discern the difference between the aspects of the question which were material to the matter in issue, and salient to the question, speaks volumes about her capacity to act as a legal practitioner.
I mean my name was used in a maths test but in my question I was building a bird house and needed help with the measurements 😂
Lol you got me giggling here. 😆 How many apples did you lose or keep? Oh.. You said a bird house. Lmao.
😂😂😂
Hahahaha mine too !!! I won a little contest that out teacher did and My name was in the physics examn hahaah but was like x needs help to raise the bucket but the line is at bla bla bla meters i don't remember was inocent and cute
I could actually see this as a genius exam tactic: By giving the characters political leanings, the exam could be used to test whether or not students can remain objective and apply the law fairly.
that’s literally it😭she’s acting ridiculous
That’s exactly what I was thinking too!
This + political leaning can determine the cause of the person being hit by the car, like if someone hates a particular group and hits someone of that group with their car, the case is more likely to be a criminal act and not an accident (I hope I'm making sense LOL)
@@seelevollerei7224NOOO ur so right
You are absolutely right. Still they shouldn't have used the student's name
Here's a new assignment question:
"Sydney slanders Freya and Daniel by distributing derogatory literature depicting offensive scenarios. What legal steps should be taken?"
actually, it's libel. Slander is speech; libel is in-print.
Brilliant! There is an opening for you at Sydney Uni....... or there should be.
@@realdeal5712 Noice mate. You thought deep and hard about that comment. 🙄
@@jcb3393 actually its defamation because its NSW and defamation is codified in the Crimes Act whilst libel is just a word with a definition.
@@realdeal5712 So, you wouldn't defend yourself if you were in that situation? You wouldn't mind being bullied in such a public manner, and you'd just choke it down? If your self-esteem is that low, you need to get some counselling.
I have studied law at University of London and so did my daughter. There were not a single question like this. Universities the world over need drastic reform and many professors and administrators need to be retired or fired.
I think we are witnessing the reform.
@@suziewilliams1360 Yea, the reform to far left idiocy.
@@suziewilliams1360 Came here to say the same.
@@suziewilliams1360 In what way is any reform happening? At least here in the United States universities are farther left ideologically every year.
So did I but via the Caribbean never was there any ? In Els or Constitutional Law like this
I'm confused by the issue. They're upset that her name was used in a question?
It could have been anyone. I don't believe there was malicious intent
I'm so sorry this happened to her, who on earth wrote this, it's bullying
It's extremely clear that the questions were designed to demonize conservative people, and the fact that they put her very rare name in there shows they wanted to smear her in the process. The West is being destroyed from the inside. Too many CCP "Manchurian Candidates" running the West's education system. Divide and Conquer.
But is it true? If she really does have HIV I'd sure as hell want to know so I can avoid her like the plague.
It's more than that. It's tantamount to libel.
@@greg77389 that would still be illegal and weird as fuck that they know.
Missing the Whole point. Not about "her". The evil is putting a political standing into criminal Law.
We in the United States know (sadly, from experience) that "internal investigations" go nowhere. If you want change, if you want action, if you want retribution... you must sue them and everyone associated with the exam and the school. Sue the ever-living crap out of them for everything they've got: for libel, for damages to reputation, for political targeting, and for potential lost future income (as this could be a seed planting in the back of minds of clients when it comes time to get a job as a lawyer).
Often it’s easier to sue everyone and let the court decide later who should be involved, rather than going to the trouble of humming and hawing over each person or entity.
U r dumb American if u don't know how EASY IT IS TO SUE if an organisation attacked you personally. Such disgusting questions targeted at a single student especially a right leaning clean cut SUE case for her she would probably get 5-10 mill from this dumb school to even allow this happen. Offcourse the idiot teacher will be fired 🤣.
It's extremely clear that the questions were designed to demonize conservative people, and the fact that they put her very rare name in there shows they wanted to smear her in the process. The West is being destroyed from the inside. Too many CCP "Manchurian Candidates" running the West's education system. Divide and Conquer.
this only exists in the USA.....
Suing them doesn't help either. Ignoring it could Freya large amounts of money, they can torpedo her career, they could stall this for years, etc. Even if they lose, some insurance company pays, their rates go up, and they charge more next year. Given how much universities in Australia are funded by the government, the taxpayer ultimate ends paying for this.
This is the weirdest story ever
Forget the part where they used actual classmates names. In what world those scenarios are ok to put on a exam? Wtf
that's small town Australia for you bby
They don’t need to use actual names subject A and subject B would suffice which shows this to be malicious
Did other students named Freya also drive a mercedes and have the same political stance?
What’s wrong with using real names snowflake ?
@@garthvolbeck8062 these are paying customers going to a university for a professional and respectful service. This was not professional or respectful behaviour from a learning institution, this has never happened in my whole life and I'm not from a snow flake generation.
@@laurieparker-stuart868 who said she had a Mercedes?
@@matthewvincent2259 in what world does the word "woke" come up in the law? What kind of law are you studying? This is not reality. If you studied law and you paid for this and accept this as normal, this says a lot about what has been happening globally.
The real crime here is how they can sit and claim no political bias then blatantly certify all these questions with ridiculously in depth and needless politically charged bias.
The premise of the question is throwing ridiculous information to make you think beyond your biases and focus on the relevant information. In other words they are red herring, something to cought you off guard if you are dumb enough to think it worth anything.
@@Italsik so why are they soo clearly biased in one direction if that is the case? If the information is to throw you off then extremities on either side should be expected.
@@OnlyGrafting wdym? from what I gathered that exam had numerous situations of a liberal or a conservative doing stupid stuff.
@@Italsik The exam questions should be about the law, not about political bias! The questions should be neutral!
@@Italsik that's exactly what I was thinking when they read the questions. I think the examiners deliberately attributed right-wing and left-wing to the characters to see if the students can objectively analyze the case despite their political biases. Nonetheless, it was kinda wild that they put the name of an actual student in there, that's where they messed up.
Who the fuck would even concoct such a scenario for an exam question?!
Wait. This showed up in my feed and I assumed it was a joke, but the comment section seems to be taking it seriously. If it is real was anything else similar to her? Or just her name? If just her name this sounds like the reach of the century 🤣
I think the political ideology was the same
On the other hand, she's just shown that she'll be an awesome lawyer.
Yes, she will be amazing if she can make the masses turn a blind eye at the crime she committed by sleeping with someone unprotected knowing she has HIV, furthermore, having people be sorry for her.
Actually she hasn't. Her statements were vapid.
@@UnitSe7en Id be willing to bet she'll have no problem finding a position in a lucrative and prestigious law firm. And all the more likely given the media exposure.
@@davejob630 No doubt.
I’m a law student and to be totally honest this doesn’t surprise me. I’ve seen slightly similar content at the uni I’m at, but not that extreme.
Did they also use students/customers names? Because that's what you are, you are paying customers, when you are paying these people for a reasonable, professional and respectful service of education
@@elizabethbradley4301 yes I know. Lucky that I’m a boring mature age student, so if I comment people just ignore me. I’m just looking forward to graduating, running my law firm and using my mouth in the courtroom where I can assist people that are attacked by the left. The world is crazy right now so those that aren’t chasing unicorns down the Yellow Brick Road in search for the Wizard of Oz need to bring some balance back,
@@Timbuctoo no one called you boring, mature aged and I literally talked to you on here, so not ignored, Im not sure what you are angling for here or the context. I do however think that people who are mature do need to communicate more and a bit better and have more respect for themselves. As soon as people get out of school they think school is everything when it isn't and they forget that they are paying for a service and they are no longer kiddies at school in a situation of glorified babysitting for too long. If this was the attitude things would change vastly and more respect would be created and encouraged at these universities by the people who run them. It's got to a point where I feel universities need to become obsolete and the businesses need to train their own people because they need them, not training people at university for a maybe job in which they've paid thousands
@@elizabethbradley4301 you’ve got some good points there, I do hope things change for the better.
@@elizabethbradley4301 u are so on point
I bet her parents are very proud of her. The world needs more people like this.
From having unprotected sex while knowing that she is hiv positive?
I thought that purposely infecting others with an std was a crime
@@youtubestudiosucks978 my thoughts exactly. How is everyone here turning a blind eye at this disgusting crime she has committed? If a man did that to me or my child, I would want them incarcerated.
Also, such evil person is studying to be a lawyer?!
@@missssy Because she didn’t do that. They lied on that part. She didn’t shout out “illiberal liberals” either ya dumb dumb. They just used her identity to make up a ‘story’ about her.
@@JustSumFroggot Just watched all the video 2nd time around, and I don't see her, nor anyone negating any of the facts.
If the story is completely made up, why would then she identify that as herself? Just because of the first name??
One would only get so worked up about it, if the story or at least some of it was true, or if one's identity was tarnished with lies.
She also says that her key issue here is biased politicisation of the topic in law exam.
Just mere attention seeking at best
I thought it was just her first name?
So let me get this straight. This is all because the person in the example had the same name? Presumably she doesn't have HIV and doesn't have a boyfriend called Daniel.
And apparently they had used the Freya example in the past several years!
Sadly, she jumped to conclusions.
Yeah its a bit weird. Maybe its just the politicisation of the questions and because they used the same name as her she felt some extra need to speak up, or perhaps she does have HIV or there is some story where she ran over someone or there is something going on with Daniel and thats where the actual interest comes from. Can't think why her friends/classmates otherwise would be texting her about it, its not like people see a friends name in a movie or TV show and text that friend about it..
@@joshuadalton6063 100% they are really focussing on the wrong part of this. Now I cant help but think she is HIV positive and drives a silver Mercedes. Very strange, the way she has put this forward has probably made her look worse. Unless of course she did run someone over, then have unprotected relations with Daniel. In which case she should probably be in prison!
right? sounds like more bs crying from the right over imagined oppression.
I'm with you on this. There is not enough information here to claim malice. To expect all names in a test to checked against 400 student names is absurd. It is a valid test for anyone to be confronted with people who share their names and have to cope with that. That's what happens in real life. . Also, I see a valid reason why you would want to test someone's ability to separate out the unnecessary info. It is entirely possible that a court case would have someone's political leanings brought in to question, rightly or wrongly.
I would only see an issue with this if EVERY question spoke about the political leanings.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Absolutely-politisising the Law to be used as Judistry wants to use =disgusting
The only thing that’s disgusting here is narcissistic drama queens who think the entire world is about them. I can’t imagine being this politically fragile
It’s gang stalking
It’s done on purpose it’s been done to me at TAFE and the teachers get off on iit
@@bullshitstomper9417grow up, ppl aren’t out to get u lol
I love how Freya sounds like she's been in the media all her life
Yea. Sounds like she is reading off cue cards.
No she sounds like a darn good lawyer in the making. Ive was a criminal lawyer for years and she is already a lot better sounding than a lot of my peers!
Yes, being self-confident and prepared for an interview definitely means there's a conspiracy afoot
@@St4rTr3v1Ut10n what conspiracy? who mentioned conspiracy? What did i miss? 😝
You should also know that it's been decades since all tv appearances became staged and rehearsed well before airing.
The last time my name was included was in a school homework where I stole 3 apples from someone and how many apples left in a basket.. This is outrageous wtf
😂
TBH, that would piss me off, too, because I am no thief.
She and the others could easily file a defamation lawsuit out of this.
I had a psychology professor use names of students in class in her test questions, but they were all in a positive context.
That still seems wrong. It can be interpreted as a judgement, approval, favouritism etc.
@@ian_b
Nah,when you have 400 names just go with the most common ones
Unless it is a clearly common place name, it is inappropriate, positive or negative.
Still not ok.
it is obvious that she is playing favorites.
Talk about hate crimes on students by adults, how disgusting....
Sue the professor and the school for defamation, harassment and discrimination.
Wow. No wonder they're targeting Freya; she's a very impressive young woman.
But does she have HIV? I will never respect promiscuous women.
I bet she speaks out a lot in class, engages too much in critical thinking, corners the prof with logic, and asks many problematic questions. This'll teach her.
@@jodi2847
Women aren't known for using logic.
@@greg77389 Women who are not in balance are usually too much in their emotions and not on the logical side, yes. Just like men who are out of balance tend to be too much in their head and logical side and not in their emotional or intuitive side. We all have feminine and masculine qualities within. Women AND men who are in balance are able to balance both sides equally, and tap into one side more when needed while not neglecting the other.
@@greg77389 Are you well?
Girl, I applaud your proactive stance in this matter, but you know you gotta sue. Even if they do conduct a formal investigation, you want to be able to see who did the investigation, who they investigated, what their conclusion was, and why they came to that conclusion. Don't let them just investigate themselves and find they did nothing wrong. Make them prove it.
She may very well want to see all those things. If it were me, I'd basically just want a bunch of peoples' balls on a platter...not to mention a few heads.
"she has HIV"
"so, obviously this is about you, how do you feel about that?"
Why would her friends think it was actually her in the exam? They're dumb! I would never think a hypothetical exam question was a class member. So dumb.
Well if she's open about her political views and then there's an exam paper mocking her views and more, I'm not surprised they noticed.
If this was one of your friends I think you'd just know.
She said, "Politics has no business in criminal law"--- a viewpoint which could soon be....criminal.
Yep, if the libs have their way
That"s exactly why she was singled out !
What if the crime is politically motivated. Or maybe the students were being tested on if their answer avoids political bias.
This is outrageous and disgusting in the extreme. It goes to show just how far things have descended. Sadly it's only going to get worse in my opinion before it gets better.
So the character had the same name as one of the 200 students in the class? Literally who cares?
Maybe I missed something but how did they know it was her? Wait, is it just that coincidentally that they share the same name so she’s presuming it’s about her?
that young lady gives me hope, intelligent, articulate, confident etc etc all whilst being filmed, that's no mean feat.
Absolutely....!!!!!
Well that says a lot about your intelligence then.
If there's no other evidence indicating it could be her, other than her first name, then thats only circumstantial evidence. Shes acting like she is definitively certain it was her, and shes supposed to be a law student?
She hasn't got a chance.
It's extremely clear that the questions were designed to demonize conservative people, and the fact that they put her very rare name in there shows they wanted to smear her in the process. The West is being destroyed from the inside. Too many CCP "Manchurian Candidates" running the West's education system. Divide and Conquer.
@@gailwaters814 Its a fact they had the same first name as her in it, but its not a fact that it was naming her nor is there anything even suggesting or implying it was her. And because of that its not evidence, and theres no chance in hell she would win a lawsuit based on that, it would be thrown out in the first 5 mins. If she tried to make a case out of it her law career would be over, her incompetence would be laid out for all to see and cause her huge embarrassment.
@@JoshPhoenix11 one can argue it’s not a typically common name and regardless, it doesn’t explain why the supposedly fictional characters need their political leanings blatantly identified- this could be argued that by doing so , it was deliberate .
How come the universities never use the names of their Administration staff instead? The universities have class lists on their computer system and could EASILY ensure that the names of students are NOT used!
@eedd sdsd or just use the professors' names, that way it won't ever be targeting a student and it's easy to defend if someone complains.
@@eeddsdsd977 Mrs. Respondent was driving her Mercedes ... allegedly hit Mr. Plaintiff ... witnessed by Jane Doe and John Doe ...
They did, just so happens one of them is called Freya too! It really isnt as uncommon as they say, i know 4 Freyas!
@@geepersoilyrag1884 You have a point. I will rethink this issue.
They just couldn't let the exam go out without signaling their loyalty and dedication to the cult by calling out "the enemy."
I've done these assignments before when I was studying criminology. They are supposed to use names like Smith, Jones, Doe, etc. and leave politics out of the assignment entirely. What the actual hell?
Sue the school. Sue it. Sue it for every dollar they have
Just look at the bias in sentencing over the years.
This exam just admits it.
Wait, are you saying that people with right-wing ideology are sentenced harsher? Or....?
@@TzarLatok
There have been Brits sent to gaol not merely for their non criminal political activity but even their views.
@@stephen227 Like whom? Particularly the 'views' part, that seems troubling.
Also wouldn't the fact they were sent to gaol make it criminal, unless you are claiming a court/s is convicting and sentencing people based on..... something.
@@TzarLatok Hate Speech, Incitement to Hatred, theyll call it what they will. You can go to prison for it. From memory, one particularly strange case was Count Dankula and his Nazzy Pug of course. But theres others no one hears about on regular platforms. One middle aged guy lived with his Mum, said something online, they found far right symbols on his bedroom wall and he went to gaol. A bloke left a bacon butty outside a mosque went to goal and died in there. Theres the young men who formed a far right group (N.A). No actual harm done yet gaoled for years was the leader. Theres always T.R of course.These just come to mind. But even less politically minded people have to be careful online or especially at work now. If the State decides you threaten its truth....and its all as politically biased as hell.
@@stephen227 " _From memory, one particularly strange case was Count Dankula and his Nazzy Pug of course._ "
No jail time.
" _One middle aged guy lived with his Mum, said something online, they found far right symbols on his bedroom wall and he went to gaol._ "
Source, name of the person, any evidence?
" _A bloke left a bacon butty outside a mosque went to goal and died in there._ "
Again, source?
" _Theres the young men who formed a far right group (N.A). No actual harm done yet gaoled for years was the leader._ "
It's getting repetitive isn't it, source?
" _Theres always T.R of course.These just come to mind._ "
Who?
Instead of just spurting out unverifiable musings maybe get names or any details that would make these searchable....
" _But even less politically minded people have to be careful online or especially at work now. If the State decides you threaten its truth....and its all as politically biased as hell._ "
Oh bud, I don't know if you're historically or politically ignorant or both. The state has ALWAYS suppressed those who threaten its power or the status quo. This is in no way new it is in fact the primary role of the state... Your claim however that sentencing is biased in the way it is doesn't really hold up, which deep down you _might_ know and is why you provided exceptionally vague and un-verifiable examples.
The one verifiable example you provided seems to indicate not that you have a problem with sentencing but the law itself? I would hope any way, unless you think the same punishment should be allowed but just for a different scenario you deem appropriate...? Which would mean you don't have a problem with political bias in laws as long as it aligns with your political bias, hopefully that isn't the case.
At any rate your sole example had no jail time (or even risk of jail time), what examples of people going to jail for their political views do you have to justify your original claim?
Ideally in Australia, are you not Australian?
" _especially at work now_ "
So you are pro-unions then?
I have some experience with exam question writing issues. Writers actually do use names and reference people they know as "inside jokes" thinking no one will catch them. A publisher had one in a school book in the US and a person contacted the publisher furious that her name, town, and occupation (all rather unique) were all listed. The publisher found the complaint very hard to believe but upon investigation found that an employee wrote the question as a "tribute" to a friend (note there was nothing negative or political in the question. It was a straightforward story math problem). The employee never told their "friend" they had done it or asked permission, so the publisher had to apologize and remove the problem. There wasn't anything derogatory in there at least, so it was resolved amicably as far as I know. It seemed to really be an innocent mistake.
My point is, this actually happens, whether the school admits it or not. Find out who actually wrote the question and then check that person's social media. Question writers are often kept anonymous because they don't want people harassing them for answers, but the school knows.
So there is someone out there who bought the 109 watermelons?
I can understand that. Just like no one wants their phone number given out to hundreds of people. Just basic privacy. Which is one reason celebrities have a really hard time.
The publisher took it out of a math text book that was already distributed? There are so many bottles of white needed
@@BrandonJohnson-bx1ht future additions. Fortunately it was caught before widespread distribution. It was a long time ago. Long before everyone threw everything on the internet. But yeah, if it was egregious I imagine they would have done a recall. I wasn't directly involved on that end.
I thought the title was completely meaning something else. I thought she "identified" as an exam question. 🤣
That is defamation.
University academics and other staff think that they have so much influence over social doctrine and policy, they also think they're above the very discrimination laws they lobby for.
And yeah - doing this to the next generation of the legal industry - that's a real smart move.
Bullying with impunity by her lecturers & university. Disgusting. Freya is a confident, intelligent, eloquent young woman who has obviously ruffled someone's feathers with her intellectual acuity. She is obviously going places. Sue them.
One of my law professors would work little jokes about particular students into his exams, but it was always light-hearted and never malicious. Not like this.
Should sue for slander and defamation.
Considering this is an exam for criminal law...
She needs to sue the crap out of the institution. You have to hit them in the pocketbook.
Get a good lawyer and sue them for defamation and emotional damage. You were made a laughingstock of your 400-peer class, and the whole school.
If you don’t sue, then they won’t take it seriously.
After all, you are studying law.
To successfully sue for defamation I believe you need to show they knowingly made false claims about *you* and also demonstrate $ damages. Not sure how she’d go proving that the question was about her, and that the obviously fictional scenario was to be taken as fact (let alone the damages)
I was once set a homework problem for physics which I suspect might have been about me. It began "Tom Backhouse hasn't done his homework again, so his teacher throws him out of the window of a plane at an altitude of... "
There were only half a dozen of us in the class at that point, and none of the others were called "Tom Backhouse" so I'm fairly confident it was about me. I thought it was funny. I did my homework that week though...
It’s good you did your homework, that was a _threat_
Why does she think it's about her exactly: Just the name? Surely people doing a degree are familiar enough with exam questions to realise they pick random names?
the obvious political charging of the details in this 'assignment' is some next-level psychological manipulation: planting fictional scenarios into peoples' minds which they can't help but be emotionally affected by when confronted with people in the future who appear to have similar character traits. this is crazy evil stuff. lawsuits don't really begin to tackle the core issue here, but it's definitely a good and necessary foot forward.
Its like nazi propaganda against jews. Painting wild stereotypes as reality in order to make people angry and hateful
Relax buddy…they’re not claiming that a certain political bent is targeted….apparently both lefties and righties are criminals in the question. You can also expect a law student to see thru this…
oh be so fr any good law student would realise they include that info to trip u up, it’s to help assess whether you can look past that
@@ak.33212 Exactly, why does no one get it??? It's really not that deep, the question is normal... This would only have been an issue if Freya actually did these things and they used the case regardless, but it's just a same-name coincidence
@@seelevollerei7224 lolll people just love to boast about being morally superior or claim that there was injustice. It’s alike to the whole white genocide thing (which obvi is far more dramatic) but it’s a tactic that conservatives love to use, or maybe she’s just dumb idk💀
Gippsland Grammar entrance exam for yr 7 on sat 5/11 included questions with the subject having They/Them pronouns for a singular person. Its endemic in rhe education system and has to be stopped.
Please tell me more. What other examples / questions are there? Sunlight is the best disinfectant. Expose the rot.
Disgusting crap, cannot believe they are teaching this stuff to kids.
You can use they/them correctly as a pronoun for a singular person though.
It usually occurs when you are aware of a person but unsure what sex or gender they are usually due to lack of knowledge of the actual person. In that case a singular person becomes they/them, correctly.
I haven't seen the question, but it may be valid grammar.
@@bobhawke7373 this was in the context of gender.
That would lead to massive discrepancies or potential future misinterpretation of history and the law, it could make it seem in the future that there was more than one person when there wasn't etc
This is crazy, though I’m a bit confused about the ideological leaning issue. My first thought was that an exam question describing a case deliberately includes irrelevant information that the student must recognise as irrelevant.
I was in my freshman year in college, and boy the culture shock I experienced when I saw our accounting exam had our names in the questions. My friend was involved in fraud, and I apparently filed for bankruptcy. It was inevitable to be teased, but we would forget it in a while, until another exam comes along. It's a vicious cycle.
A good chance for this young law student to pursue charges against this faculty. Sue them Freya! If you were my daughter I would be marching in there and tearing strips off those disgusting turds. How dare they do this to their students!
l thought it was funny when he said to Freya that he wasn't surprised that her friends thought it was about her, after he spoke of the sex scenario.
I noticed that too 😂
I laughed at that, in an ironic way.
Just shows you what they are teaching these days
The university is implying to students that conservatives are mean and nasty people, while lefties are society's good and caring people, and are victims of mean and nasty conservatives. Similar insinuations occur in the case studies in clinical psychology post grad training and in gov funded facilities in-service trainings. Those with drug, violence, insecurity, criminal tendencies and antisocial personalities, are often inferred to be conservative or to come from conservative families, when in reality in clinical practice it is mostly the other way around.
Naval gazing…
LEFTISM 😈😈
Law??
It’s Gang Stalking it’s deliberate
Tell me you think the world revolves around you without telling me you think the world revolves around you
Wait is she saying she identified all of these things in common with herself? Or they used her name in a question and added all the other stuff to make her look bad?
Pretty sure it's the second one. But the car may be accurate to her.
This is utterly appalling.
You should also file a complaint to the law society regarding the individual persons responsible for the question. This is a clear breach of the code of conduct for lawyers and they should be disciplined.
OMG we’re all gonna die!! Lol
@@vestagirl8484 if that's the best you can do then don't bother
@@DominicPelle ok - keep virtue signaling, so avant-garde! And, of course, keep felating your younger brother. Ick.
LEFTISM 😈😈
It’s really not, time to grow up, snowflake.
From my standpoint, I feel the point is being missed here. This maybe a decision around time constraints, as far as the examiners are concerned - they crib questions from previous papers, to save time compiling the current examination - a common practice in education. However, because the similarity between a real-life person and the individual described in the question is beyond the realms of statistical possibility, it is no wonder that the student complained.
I do find it strange that the University is unable to supply the question which it "re-cycled" - that is a red flag for me. What is so secret? By not publicising the relevant papers, it leads us to believe the University is either lying, terrified of litigation, or just plain arrogant!
After that lengthy preamble, my point is this: Who at that University, has the thought process which results in compiling a question involving a "right-wing" car driver, who runs over a political opponent, then goes on to have promiscuous sex with a man, knowing she has "AIDS" but not declaring it to her sexual partner? It seems that the question is a product of a warped mind - that of a degenerate.
That is the point for me - who on earth dreams up these scenarios? What depraved mind thinks of all the possible political possibilities and current talking points, then includes them into (crams them into), a question on a Law exam paper? I guess we must be grateful that the mastermind behind this question did not throw "Roe v Wade" into the mix!
If ever there was an advert for not going to university, this was it! They teach nothing, other than political apartheid. After 3 or 4 years, they hand you a copy of Mao's "Little Red Book" and the red flag, bumper sticker and basebell cap, all with the hammer & sickle logo on them.
In america both are crazy. True conservatives wouldn't do either have random sex or run people down with a car.
@@chasingthefish9042 This is true.
If this student doesn't understand profiles and motive, I think she isn't ready for law school. Who is the sensitive party again? So I guess all tests need to remove all mentions of mary, jennifer, mat, mark, donald, etc etc?
Exactly
I want to see the full exam because I’m still unsure what exactly I’m seeing here. I mean, I would be less angry if what the full exam said had more to do with what the questions were implying but I still have no idea…
You should call out the name/s of the faculty members responsible for those questions. They should be publicly shamed if not sued.
Australia is a country I never thought would fall to this type of dogma.
Better believe it. Those in power mindlessly follow whatever happens in America. It's embarrassing.
That's probably why, if nobody was watching.
Is this not a common thing that names are used in exam questions...
Crazy thing is that in California that leans a certain way, has it on law that they don't have to tell someone that they have h.i.v./aids.
The question(s) is 1. Did the people compiling the test know the class personally and 2. Was this done after her arrival. If yes to both, then you clearly have some bitter ultra progressive who doesn't know how to keep politics out of their daily lives, wanting to tear this woman down. In which case they should be weeded out. There's no place for this kind of juvenile animosity in houses of learning. And consider this. If those making the test can have such a bias, what's stopping somebody similar being involved in the grading process?
Thank you for investing your time in a sensible and much needed response. Those of us who have studied Law (my wife has a PhD) recognise the seriousness of this issue.
LEFTISM 😈😈
This was an assignment, not a test. Assignments are usually created/provided by the professor directly.
@@rushelm8101 its not serious they used the exact same name in the past, this girl is narcissim at its finest. they also took the piss out of left wing environmental activist who killed a security guard in the 2019 paper. You didnt see anyone protesting when that happened. This girl caused 400 other students to retake a 5000 word assignment over something so trivial.
@@harrisonarmstrong9387 That's a bit of a straw man, mate. I'm not talking about her. Forget her. I'm talking about there being an unacceptable level of bias, not to mention unprofessionalism *if* this is deliberate. If not, then it's just negligent.
Ok, this is not clear for me. Is she upset because the character in the exam question has the same name as her, or because she is identifiable by her actions?
I think they mentioned a Freya who drove a Mercedes and is HIV positive, which matches the real Freya, so it’s identifiable and not likely to be a coincidence. At least that’s what I’m reading into it. More info on how she made the association that they are talking about her would’ve been useful. The exam is weird, though - the actions described don’t appear to be politically motivated, so all the political talk seems unnecessary. Different story if they were talking about a political murder or something.
@@lionelpinkhard6509 I hate to say it but we need to know if she has HIV or not. If she does, it’s public shaming. If not, but she does drive a Mercedes, it’s a false accusation. On a side note, if she does have HIV and is having unprotected relations with unknowing partners, she should be educated on the dangers of her selfishness and deceitfulness in a more appropriate and structured way.
@@Veritas-invenitur Yeah, I agree. There’s probably some truth and some lies in that exam question, but the fact that it’s identifiable and everyone noticed who they were talking about, tells me that there’s a decent amount of truth in there.
So sorry to hear this!! Good luck exposing them for this case and hopefully suing for slander/deformation and the effect it's had on you and your peers.
*defamation
Wow this blew my mind, I never knew there were other people with the same name as me. 🙄
its obviously targeted, the names and political messaging are not coincidence, its too close . You would not be happy if the politics were reversed would you.
The things you don't know would fill a library.
Why use names save all this its easy person a and person b , female a or male b. If proff doesn't like you then they can use ur name fair ? So why do it. They dont have too
FYI, Educational institutions are covered under workplace law in Australia - whatever would happen legally if this bullying occured in a workplace would apply equally in this case.
I'm confused, was the story mentioned in the question related to her? Like did she hit someone with a car and then have unprotected sex knowing she was HIV positive? Or is it just her name 🤔
I think the problem wasn't just her name, it was the political views and the description of crimes. Ring wing bad. Left wing good. Right wing criminals. Left wing victims.
I'm confused too...
It was identifying enough that friends in her class messaged her about it.
Rewatch the video
It’s just her name lmaoo
Wow that is the sickest thing to hear. Wow... 😡
I doubt the exam writer was targeting her directly. But it doesn’t make sense why they include political leanings in the question when it bears no relevance. I do remember those outrageous exam questions scenarios though. They were always pretty ridiculous 😅
political leanings were supposed to be the motivations for the crime.
@@punisher5558 true but a law exam is never going to ask you what the offender’s motivation was for a murder cus it’s not relevant… unless it could come under a hate crime offence. But I don’t think political beliefs fall under those provisions. It’s more just to make the scenario more engaging for the students, but I think they went overboard on this occasion
@@LydiaKelso123 True, they won't ask about the motivation specifically, so it's not an inherently political question. There just needed to be a motivation. Also law exam scenarios are usually wild and overboard for academic integrity reasons.
They include it precisely because it is irrelevant. A student is supposed to be able to sort through all the irrelevant information about someone and pinpoint exactly why they are or aren't criminally liable.
@@punisher5558 You think DAs will put "She was left-wing. He was right-wing." in their statements? That's Twitter teenie ductus.
That's completely unhinged. There needs to be consequences for these academics who think they're protected no matter how insane their actions.
I smell a big fat lawsuit coming.
This is detestable!😤
its all about "me, me, me, me, me." So self absorbed to think entire test questions are based on her, that she must be a target and a "victim" somehow, because coincidences must be impossible for a generic name like that.
i’m so confused. is she just upset because the name is the same? or are the other parts the same and she’s snitching on herself ?? was this a standardized test? also, i’d expect for there to be irrelevant and biased questions on a law exam to make sure the students are remaining unbiased? i feel like a lot of context was left out of this video lol
What the hell is that no wonder this country is in trouble , totally unaustralian and divisive!
I studied law at Sydney University and it does not really surprise me that they are setting questions like this.
She is sounding woke with her offense. Heaven forbid the name is the same as yours.
The test was the second part of the exam where they actually do take the uni to court. A true test.
A "formal complaint" is the same as giving consent.
This is happening all over the world because of ideology... it's very sad, indeed. She is a strong and brave girl.
Astounding that this should happen.
As a student in a different sector of the uni. It doesn’t get better
I can't get if it's a comedy sketch or real situation.
If it wasn't deliberate, it certainly WAS insensitive, to not check any students in that law course had the same names as the exam/assignment protagonists! The politics of the characters was also unnecessary!
Normal people would realise it is just a name used in an assessment question and nothing to be upset about though.
@@Phrax5 actually, normal people with emotional intelligence and critical thinking capabilities would read into it and assess it. Maybe you don't spend time with "normal" people?
Not possible it wasn't deliberate. Apart from the categorisation of people into convenient ideological slots.
@@Phrax5 I know, but you got to admit, it's an ODD 'coincidence', esp when several other classmates also had the same names as the characters in the scenarios presented!
It's also unprofessional to use terminology in a law setting exam such as "woke" when this has nothing to do with the law. It's creating an idea that this is a real legal thing when it isn't. It's totally unprofessional and these people aren't just students, they are paying customers and need to be treated as such and with professional respect. I don't imagine we would have lawyers going on the stand claiming "a woke person dud this or that". But with this education they are definitely trying to normalize and legalise this narrative in a sneaky way.
That is shocking
It's outrageous on the part of the university. Those responsible must be fired with dishonor. Absolutely required.