गलत है बिल्कुल गलत है, कानून बिल्कुल ही उल्टे काम कर रहा है, इस तरह से तो कोई भी कुछ नहीं कर सकेगा, crime बढ़ता ही जाएगा और इसका जिम्मेदार केवल कानून है
Kaanoon kaise apradhi bnaya jaa sakta kaanoon bnane wala hi apradhi hai jo apraadho ko badhava de rha pehle evidence maangne ko kaanoon fir evidence bnane ko apraadh btane wala kaanoon bna ke
Then what does the court mean by asking "Produce evidence"???? 🤔 What are we supposed to do? Does recording the issues "with consent"produce any evidence? ..... it's like alerting a person not to reveal any truth since this is going to be evidence. Why do CCTV cameras even exist then, when the recording is without anyone's consent??
Logo ko ghumraah karne ka kaanoon 420 apraadh should immediately arrest who framed this act and who demanded and impliment this fraudi militant act which promote crime and save to the criminals and hraas torcher to the innocent peoples
जब रिकॉर्डिंग नहीं करेंगे तो पत्नी के अवैध संबंध या सास ससुर से मारपीट को कैसे साबित करेंगे कानून बताएं इसीलिए कहते हैं कानून अंधा होता है कानूनी अपराध को बढ़ावा दे रहा है लगता है।।। यदि पत्नी किसी से अवध संबंध बनाती है या सास ससुर से मारपीट करती है तो क्या हुआ उसे रिकॉर्डिंग करने का अनुमति देगी कानून स्पष्ट करें❤
Kaanoon khud nhi banta balki kaanoon ko bnaya jata hai jo dalitvadi log bna rhe hain varna mnuvadi logo ka to snattan kaanoon tha naki aisa ambedkrite likhit kaanoon jo logo ko pehle ghumraah kiya ki apradh hai to evidence laao fir apne kaanoon ki hi hatya kar di ki evidence bnaoge to apraadh, isi ko kehte hain sir na pair apne .... pta nhi deen majhub nhi aur logo ko 80 saal se chle manavta saamaanta niyam sikhane ye dalitvadi dogle bheemte jo snatnio bhartio ko btate ureshian videshi aur apne ko adivasi pichchhda moolnivasi
Purusho ko kya desh dharam ko hi nashht bhrashht karna ujhadhna barvaad karna utpeedhne chahti yu jativadi swaarth ke liye doglapanthi kapat kar ghumraah bhrahmmit kar uljhaa ke
In my view, as soon as the couple is married, the personal privacy between them ends there. If anyone still claims it, it means that person is not reliable and he/she is dodging the other for his/her wested interests.
Pati patni hi brahmmand mein ek aisa rishta hai jinmein 0 % bhi privacy nhi hoti that was brahmmnical snattan sanskriti manushya samvidhaan mnusmriti mnuvadi paakhandd hatyachaar and pati patni mein nijta hoti it is dalitvaad of 80 years ambedkrite written constitutional govt system
Our honourable court talk about the privacy breach, but can they explain who will give the consent to opposite party to record the conversation? Nobody will give the permission. So how one will collect the evidence. If some terrorist or some robber is giving me warning or threatening me, on Call, then how I will prove that somebody is trying to disturb me? I think matter of privacy breach should be dealt separately.
Then should 0 tolerance first against them who ordered to the peoples for providing evidence to proof crime mandatory should do this first then ahead may proceed this fraudi dalitvadi militancy concept, hmari privacy to dalitvadi written constitutional govt govt govt department adminstration judiciary hi breach kar rhi thi kra rhi thi aur ab bhi agar breach nhi kregi to nayaypalika jo bnane ka fraud apraadh 80 saal se kiya usi ki hatya bhi karne ka apradh kregi apradhi sirf dalitvaad hai, ho hi nhi sakta ki privacy breach na ho aur nayaypalika chalti rhe
How I will prove without electronic media. Then court must give a guide line to us how to prove that person is taking falls. The guilty person can not give proof. The cc TV in road side is not legal at per court. Then why the police take cc TV footage to identify the guilty person. ? Crime is crime it must not hide to saying these type of decision. Court must say how I prove the guilty person.
Sir, call recording as a evidence kitne saal tak illigible hoti hai ? Or kya court uss recording ko valid mantha hai ji third person kartha kini do logo ki ?
Ye agyani hain aur jleel aatankk bhulakkad bhi isiliye aisa jaanbhoojh ke kar rhe jo 80 saal se kar rhe inhone jhooth bola logo se ki inko gyan nhi diya jata tha jabki aisa ho hi nhi sakta tha agar hua hota to ye netagiri kahan se jhaadne shuru ho gye aur agar brtishians oxfordi ambedkrite schooli padhai se shiksha li to ye kaisi siksha li jo bhrashtachaar ghooskhori hramkhor muftkhor sifarishkhor anachaar vyavchaari makkaar beimaan aatankki lammpatt dalitvadi mahilavadi ambedkrite written constitutional govt system desh par failaya
What about video recording, if murder recorded on CCTV , so it's also against the privacy of Murderer , Is he can file case against the person who record it ??
The same courts allows wife to get Husband's income details via RTI etc citing that there's no privacy between husband and wife... The husband using the same logic can deny disclosing his assets citing right to privacy...
Jnab ghumrahikaran chhodo ye btaao agle ko pta ho ki call recording ki jaa rhi ya darr ho ki badmizi hinsa aadi par call record ki jaa rhi hogi to kya aisa koi agar gali galoch hinsa updrav karne ki call recording par call record complaint lgaye to apradhi kisko maana jayega call record karne wale ko ya call recording par call record karne wale par complaint karne wale ko, aur kya call record apradh hai isse ajagruk anjaan ko call recording apradhi maana jata hai
Pati patni ke bich kya nijta honi chahiye bhala ..... kanoon only ladies ke liye hai pati pr atyachar ho ga ..,..... kanoon Aisa kare ke pati ko sidhe fasi Dede patni ke kahne pr ....kyoki wo ladka hai galti ladke ki hi hogi
Sir. mara sadi ko 4 mahina 16 din par wife gar chor ka cala Gaya or mara u par 498A or mantanas case kardiya ha. mantanas case ma wife na juta Affiliated diya ha to kahoga. Please sir bataya .
Mere wife mere upar bahot sare cases Kiya hee fir bhi meee khus hun 3 mahina sath rahe fir chala gaya fir case kar diya 1 sal se paisa nehi de Rahi hun 5000 ke hisab se 60000 hajar to rahe gaya
Kidhar ke tar kidhar bhi jod dete hai.Koun pagal permission deke galat bat bolega.Chori ko chori chupke hi pakada ja sakata hai.Idar pati aur patni ke related bat hai na ki general public ki.Judge ko pati ke jagah khada karake case ladane ke liye bolana chahiye.Jab usper bitegi tab pata chalega family me kya privacy hoti hai or kya nahi.
Mera love marriage tha sir fir vi woo esa Kiya me marriage karna nehi chata hun oo bol raha heee ki 5 saal case ladhe ga me haske bola me 50 saal case ladh ne ke liye ready hun chal 😂
Koi patni adultary me heee usko bata ke ham video manaye yie court kehite hee? To fir kese sabit kare oo galat heee oo to fir Jo bolega hum ko karna padega fir court kyu jae jhute case me kon heee loog kaha se ate hee isss prakar ka jugad ment Dene ke liyeeeee😂
Committing a crime or planning to harm someone in any manner can't be considered a private act even if being commited privately or even in naked state. . Its more like koi chor range hath chori karte pakda jaye to bol de ye iske ghar me CCTV kya kar raha hai? aise kaise bina permission record kar lia mereko.
Husband can never win divorce case in Dwarka family court, just because of a bad character advocate who seeks next date pretending throat stomach back pain, dlsa duty(02times) her child PTM, while appearing in other cases on same day, court succumb to her 👙👠💋 sexy smile & outlook, No one is ready to listen husband 👨
गलत है बिल्कुल गलत है, कानून बिल्कुल ही उल्टे काम कर रहा है, इस तरह से तो कोई भी कुछ नहीं कर सकेगा, crime बढ़ता ही जाएगा और इसका जिम्मेदार केवल कानून है
Kaanoon kaise apradhi bnaya jaa sakta kaanoon bnane wala hi apradhi hai jo apraadho ko badhava de rha pehle evidence maangne ko kaanoon fir evidence bnane ko apraadh btane wala kaanoon bna ke
@@gurdevkumar7279 actually judge sahab ki upri kamai ka jariya khatam hota hai. Doodh ka doodh Pani ka Pani ho jata hai turant isiliye
Then what does the court mean by asking "Produce evidence"???? 🤔 What are we supposed to do? Does recording the issues "with consent"produce any evidence? ..... it's like alerting a person not to reveal any truth since this is going to be evidence. Why do CCTV cameras even exist then, when the recording is without anyone's consent??
Logo ko ghumraah karne ka kaanoon 420 apraadh should immediately arrest who framed this act and who demanded and impliment this fraudi militant act which promote crime and save to the criminals and hraas torcher to the innocent peoples
जब रिकॉर्डिंग नहीं करेंगे तो पत्नी के अवैध संबंध या सास ससुर से मारपीट को कैसे साबित करेंगे कानून बताएं इसीलिए कहते हैं कानून अंधा होता है कानूनी अपराध को बढ़ावा दे रहा है लगता है।।। यदि पत्नी किसी से अवध संबंध बनाती है या सास ससुर से मारपीट करती है तो क्या हुआ उसे रिकॉर्डिंग करने का अनुमति देगी कानून स्पष्ट करें❤
Kaanoon khud nhi banta balki kaanoon ko bnaya jata hai jo dalitvadi log bna rhe hain varna mnuvadi logo ka to snattan kaanoon tha naki aisa ambedkrite likhit kaanoon jo logo ko pehle ghumraah kiya ki apradh hai to evidence laao fir apne kaanoon ki hi hatya kar di ki evidence bnaoge to apraadh, isi ko kehte hain sir na pair apne .... pta nhi deen majhub nhi aur logo ko 80 saal se chle manavta saamaanta niyam sikhane ye dalitvadi dogle bheemte jo snatnio bhartio ko btate ureshian videshi aur apne ko adivasi pichchhda moolnivasi
Now you'd need consent of the criminal /blackmailer/harraser/scammer to produce evidence against them.
Brilliant 😌👍
This constitutional law makers are biggest 10 numbri criminal of bharat country immediately should arrest
Do not get married at all in India
@@mysticnomad89 ur right
Vichaar toh saaf hai
Bharat ki nyaypalika purusho ko nyay nhi Dena chaati
Purusho ko kya desh dharam ko hi nashht bhrashht karna ujhadhna barvaad karna utpeedhne chahti yu jativadi swaarth ke liye doglapanthi kapat kar ghumraah bhrahmmit kar uljhaa ke
Pati, patni ke case mein call recording aur video recording ke alava aur kya rakh sakhte hai. Kesa kanoon hai ye
Supreme court also said phone tapping by thirf person is illegql but if u are involved in conversation then its legal.
Breach of privacy is not a absolute right
Never in pati and patni, husband wife we can't say whatever they do for it firstly know about what is husband and wife mean base
In my view, as soon as the couple is married, the personal privacy between them ends there. If anyone still claims it, it means that person is not reliable and he/she is dodging the other for his/her wested interests.
Pati patni hi brahmmand mein ek aisa rishta hai jinmein 0 % bhi privacy nhi hoti that was brahmmnical snattan sanskriti manushya samvidhaan mnusmriti mnuvadi paakhandd hatyachaar and pati patni mein nijta hoti it is dalitvaad of 80 years ambedkrite written constitutional govt system
Justice is above privacy.
So, CCTV footage also should be banned, because it violates privacy of thief 😂
Dalitvaad hai to mumkin hai
Our honourable court talk about the privacy breach, but can they explain who will give the consent to opposite party to record the conversation? Nobody will give the permission. So how one will collect the evidence. If some terrorist or some robber is giving me warning or threatening me, on Call, then how I will prove that somebody is trying to disturb me? I think matter of privacy breach should be dealt separately.
Then should 0 tolerance first against them who ordered to the peoples for providing evidence to proof crime mandatory should do this first then ahead may proceed this fraudi dalitvadi militancy concept, hmari privacy to dalitvadi written constitutional govt govt govt department adminstration judiciary hi breach kar rhi thi kra rhi thi aur ab bhi agar breach nhi kregi to nayaypalika jo bnane ka fraud apraadh 80 saal se kiya usi ki hatya bhi karne ka apradh kregi apradhi sirf dalitvaad hai, ho hi nhi sakta ki privacy breach na ho aur nayaypalika chalti rhe
How I will prove without electronic media. Then court must give a guide line to us how to prove that person is taking falls. The guilty person can not give proof. The cc TV in road side is not legal at per court. Then why the police take cc TV footage to identify the guilty person. ? Crime is crime it must not hide to saying these type of decision. Court must say how I prove the guilty person.
You are absolutely right. Crime cannot be justified in the name of privacy breach.
Sir, call recording as a evidence kitne saal tak illigible hoti hai ?
Or kya court uss recording ko valid mantha hai ji third person kartha kini do logo ki ?
Ye agyani hain aur jleel aatankk bhulakkad bhi isiliye aisa jaanbhoojh ke kar rhe jo 80 saal se kar rhe inhone jhooth bola logo se ki inko gyan nhi diya jata tha jabki aisa ho hi nhi sakta tha agar hua hota to ye netagiri kahan se jhaadne shuru ho gye aur agar brtishians oxfordi ambedkrite schooli padhai se shiksha li to ye kaisi siksha li jo bhrashtachaar ghooskhori hramkhor muftkhor sifarishkhor anachaar vyavchaari makkaar beimaan aatankki lammpatt dalitvadi mahilavadi ambedkrite written constitutional govt system desh par failaya
What about video recording, if murder recorded on CCTV , so it's also against the privacy of Murderer , Is he can file case against the person who record it ??
गाली देना
धमकी देना निजता का अधिकार हे
फिर सबुत कहा से लाए
परमिशन ले भाई आप लपडे करे आपकी इच्छा हे तो हम रेकॉर्ड करे
The same courts allows wife to get Husband's income details via RTI etc citing that there's no privacy between husband and wife...
The husband using the same logic can deny disclosing his assets citing right to privacy...
Crime promoting fraudi act laws
Jnab ghumrahikaran chhodo ye btaao agle ko pta ho ki call recording ki jaa rhi ya darr ho ki badmizi hinsa aadi par call record ki jaa rhi hogi to kya aisa koi agar gali galoch hinsa updrav karne ki call recording par call record complaint lgaye to apradhi kisko maana jayega call record karne wale ko ya call recording par call record karne wale par complaint karne wale ko, aur kya call record apradh hai isse ajagruk anjaan ko call recording apradhi maana jata hai
Pati patni ke bich kya nijta honi chahiye bhala ..... kanoon only ladies ke liye hai pati pr atyachar ho ga ..,..... kanoon Aisa kare ke pati ko sidhe fasi Dede patni ke kahne pr ....kyoki wo ladka hai galti ladke ki hi hogi
Ambedkrite dalitvadi mansikta aisi hi to hai varna vanchit kyun karta vaidhik snattan dharam manushhya samvidhaan mnusmriti
Sir. mara sadi ko 4 mahina 16 din par wife gar chor ka cala Gaya or mara u par 498A or mantanas case kardiya ha. mantanas case ma wife na juta Affiliated diya ha to kahoga. Please sir bataya .
Email me at adv.piyushmittal@gmail.com
This is very debating topic some higcourts allowed it or some deny
Permission to be given to Husband
Normally it's allowed in criminal cases when police use it....it's denied between private parties....
@@LegalGurukulCan we use call recordings in D.V. cases and in 498A FIR, as both are criminal cases.
Galat Judgment hai sir ji
Kya chor pulish ko bata ke chori karta hai ?
Mere wife mere upar bahot sare cases Kiya hee fir bhi meee khus hun 3 mahina sath rahe fir chala gaya fir case kar diya 1 sal se paisa nehi de Rahi hun 5000 ke hisab se 60000 hajar to rahe gaya
10000 likes for your comment short but powerfull
Citations please share
Judgement link provided in video description. Kindly check
Wrong judgements..i should have Wright to record all my conversation at my phone for my social safety just like CCTV camera at my own house
Sir , I want latest supreme court judgements on screenshot and watsup n text masages 🙏as soon as possible 🙏
Cctv camere ki recording chl skti k wo v ni😂
Kidhar ke tar kidhar bhi jod dete hai.Koun pagal permission deke galat bat bolega.Chori ko chori chupke hi pakada ja sakata hai.Idar pati aur patni ke related bat hai na ki general public ki.Judge ko pati ke jagah khada karake case ladane ke liye bolana chahiye.Jab usper bitegi tab pata chalega family me kya privacy hoti hai or kya nahi.
Mera love marriage tha sir fir vi woo esa Kiya me marriage karna nehi chata hun oo bol raha heee ki 5 saal case ladhe ga me haske bola me 50 saal case ladh ne ke liye ready hun chal 😂
Kal ko ek law or aayega patni k marzi k bina unpar case hi nahi kar sakte 😂
Koi patni adultary me heee usko bata ke ham video manaye yie court kehite hee?
To fir kese sabit kare oo galat heee oo to fir Jo bolega hum ko karna padega fir court kyu jae jhute case me kon heee loog kaha se ate hee isss prakar ka jugad ment Dene ke liyeeeee😂
To me it sounds like the court only wants to buy more time this way.
Bahut hi ghatiya rule hai
Ye kanun galat hai
Recording always not good evedence koi gusse me ya bhavnao me bhekar bhi keh sakta hai
Correct
Rules for fools
Pathi aur patni ke beech mein privacy hona ek chutiya pana hai agar patni kesi se awadhsambhand rakthi hai uska kya ukaad lega court
Kindly be civilized....
Committing a crime or planning to harm someone in any manner can't be considered a private act even if being commited privately or even in naked state.
.
Its more like koi chor range hath chori karte pakda jaye to bol de ye iske ghar me CCTV kya kar raha hai?
aise kaise bina permission record kar lia mereko.
Husband can never win divorce case in Dwarka family court, just because of a bad character advocate who seeks next date pretending throat stomach back pain, dlsa duty(02times) her child PTM, while appearing in other cases on same day, court succumb to her 👙👠💋 sexy smile & outlook, No one is ready to listen husband 👨