CALL RECORDING is LEGAL or ILLEGAL in India ? Call Recording Laws in India | StudyIQ
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
- In this video, we explore the legality of recording phone calls in India. Gain a comprehensive understanding of call recording laws and regulations, ensuring that you are informed about your rights and responsibilities when it comes to call recording.
For all Judicial Services Exams visit here
bit.ly/Judicia...
Judiciary (Pre + Mains)
bit.ly/Judicia...
StudyIQ Judicial Services Course covers
-Videos of all the Major and Minor laws, Local Laws
- Weekly Live Doubt cum Mentorship Sessions
-Current Affairs Videos by Dr. Gaurav Garg,
-Judgement Writing Classes, Essay Writing and Answer Writing Classes and many more Sessions
-Test Series for Prelims
-Subject wise PYQ Paper Sets for all State Judicial Services.
Judicial Service Examinations of 15 States Covered- Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Haryana, Punjab, Delhi, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand, West Bengal, Orissa, Jharkhand , Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh
For all Judicial Services Exams visit here
bit.ly/Judicia...
Download the App to Subscribe to the Course
bit.ly/studyiqApp
For any doubt, Call : 080-6897-3353
Click here for Whatsapp Chat
wa.me/919554443351
INDEPENDENCE DAY SALE is Live on StudyIQ Judiciary
🏆 Ace Your Judiciary Journey with our Unique UDAAN Batch
Batch Link- www.studyiq.com/course-detail/udaan-judiciary-live-foundation-batch
💥To Know More About Batch Watch- ruclips.net/user/livekn1glBMVLQ0?feature=share
● 1 Yr Extra Live Classes Validity
● 7 Days Fees Refund Policy
Enroll now in Independence Day Sale and get the Batch in just 25,999 by using your Favorite Educators Code
Hurry up! Sale is Live till 15th Aug
For any queries please call us on - 080-4980-1290
Victim:- I am recording your call.
Criminal:- Ok I support you, please collect evidence.
😂
😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂
😂
😂😂😂😂😂
In India judges don't follow laws, they follow their mood.
They follows their aka's command
Yes absolutely right
कल के दिन ऐसा भी होगा कि criminal से परमिशन लेनी होगी की तेरे खिलाफ सबूत जुटाएं या नहीं! और वो कहेगा नहीं और केस वापस।।
Hum sub currupted se parmission lena padega ab o permission dega ki nahi usko faisla court karegi
😢
Sahi baat hain 😂
Bilkul sahi kaha aapne ❤❤❤
Now these days
Strange that you can win a case by producing false witnesses but not by producing genuine phone call recording 🤔
सच्चाई को सामने लाने के लिए कोई भी तरीका,गैरकानूनी नहीं होना चाहिए।
bilkul sahi bhai
King you drop something precious called leather belt 🙈
1 person ka Right to Justice le lo...dusre person ko right to privacy de do.... bohot badhiya 👏👏👏Well done Judiciary 😑
In that case, court me CCTV CAMERA install karna aur sare court hearing ko record karna without clients concent is also violating the right to privacy
court is a public place
That's why you must display " you are under CCTV Surveillance". or " CCTV in Operation" than you are covered by Law
@@sunilahuja108then what if we do same
It means that you can commit crime privately under privacy clause and if you record it without his consent, it will be not admissible by court. What a judgement!!!!!!
It should be allowed, victim person must have a right to collect evidence whether it is legal or illegal. We should not inform a criminal before recording an audio,video and any other evidence.
Yes you are right.
Very good decision. If someone is giving life threatening on call, asking for bribe etc. then the victim will politely ask to the other person 'Sir, since you're doing unlawful against me, Im going to record the phone call and produce it in court, please start threatening me.'
CCTV is also illegal 😂 right to privacy
😛
That's why you must display " you are under CCTV Surveillance". or " CCTV in Operation" than you are covered by Law
@@sunilahuja108only thieves and dacoits will not like
@@sunilahuja108😂dhruv rathee km dekha kr.
CC tv lagte lagte kitna yug bit jayega tub Tak kitna curruption badh jayega
U r right... High court judgement is wrong... The husband should move to supreme court.
supreme court will also agree with the high court judgement becuz sc also says husband has to give maintenance to wife who is having adultery
इंडिया में जज भी मेरी तरह कम पढ़े लिखे हैं इनकी कानून के हिसाब से कम से कम 2 साल की ट्रेनिंग होनी चाहिए हर एक जज अपने मर्जी के हिसाब से फैसला देता है चाहे मैं फैसला अच्छा हो चाहे बुरा हो🙏🙏
Aur 1 time khana Dena chahiye
In my opinion, the Parliament as well as the Judiciary should work together to clarify such ticklish issues by passing amendments to the applicable laws in a very crisp manner so as not to leave any loopholes for any interpretations. Such efforts would go a long way in reducing the pendency of cases in the Courts where on similar grounds, people across different Courts in different States of India have to unnecessarily spend their valuable time, money and energy!
I would really appreciate it if you make a special video on how to make a certificate under Sec. 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act to assist people to draft one with all the essential requirements. Thank you ma'am.
आजकल जजो मे न्याय लेने की बुद्धि नही रही।ये तो common sense की बात है सबूत चाहिए तो बिना बताए रेकॉर्डिंग करनी पड़ेगी। बता देने के बाद तो सामने वाला सावधान जो जाएगा।इतनी सी भी कॉमन सेंस नही रही जजो में
Agar rahta to Aisa faisla karta
Exactly
Fir Tarik par tarikh kaise paregi
U all right
Saaf paani ke machhar hai ye dengue, Jo paida achhe mahol me hote hai lekin jyada Jaan leva hote hai. Inhi mahagyaaniyo ne adultery ko bhi crime nahi hai mana hai.
Ye jyada crime badhana chahte hai.
This call recording settings were set up to prevent ourselves from false allegations. So, this must be allowed. It might violate the right to privacy in a way of illegal but, way of fighting against fake allegations. Thank you ma'am for such an informative video.
If someone threatens me and I produce call recordings, then such a judge will clearly charge me under that call recording case 😂😂😂
Pehle kanoon andha tha
Ab chutiya ban gaya hai
True
Agreed
Are yaar...Galat decision/Judgment de do pr call recording mtt suno ?......Waah re Judiciary waah😑....... Honest hote huye bhi banda case haar jaaye usko justice na mile Wo chalega...pr kisi ki privacy violate nhi honi chahiye wo bhi call conversation jaisi....Waah👏👏👏
Husband: i m recording our call
Wife: ok I will speak the truth😂
About Monica?
Epic sir
🏆Ace Your Judiciary Journey with our Unique Eklavya Batch
Batch Link - www.studyiq.com/course-detail/eklavya-judiciary-live-foundation-batch
● Clear Prelims of any State Judiciary and get 50% fee refund
● Clear any State Judiciary and get 150% fee refund
● Success Assurance with 1 yr extra validity
Enroll now in MONSOON Dhamaka sale and get the batch in just 27,999 by using your Favorite Educators Code
Hurry up! Admissions closing on 31st July
For any queries please call us on - 080-49801290
Indian judges should understand the right to privacy is not for only wife but it is also right of privacy for husband also, if both spouses have gone to court for their internal matter, then this matter is self proven legal.
Koi us judge ko phone pe gaali de phir dekho😂
😂😂😂😂
@@Know24x7 😅
😂😂😂😂
Kya laya bhai kaha se sochate ho aap
@@Traget100days Jaise ko taisa🤣
2:22 Case Law begins here 3:55 CrPC Sec 311 6:00 People Union For Civil vs UOI on 6 January 2004 Appeal civil 4294 of 1998 6:55 Supreme Court of India R M Malkani vs State Of Maharashtra on 22 September 1972 citations 1973 AIR 157 1973 SCR 2 417 7:25 Madhya Pradesh High Court Smt Anurima Mehta alias Abha Mehta vs Sunil Mehta on 27 August 2015 W P No 5833 2015 9:19 R M Malkani vs State Of Maharashtra on 22 September 1972 citations 1973 AIR 157 1973 SCR 2 417
मतलब अब अपने बचाव के लिए आदमी avidence भी नहीं जुटा सकता 😂😂😂😂
It is like thief says production of cctv footage is violation of right of privacy under article 21 ...😂 .. So calling call recording is illegal doesn't make any sense ...
well said
Court paradox....
That's why you must display " you are under CCTV Surveillance". or " CCTV in Operation" than you are covered by Law
@@sunilahuja108 are u defending court's decision against the husband? If so, then u are a jaroo ke gulam
@@sunilahuja108😂tu paida hote chaman tha ya course Kiya tha?
As an electronic evidence, the original electronic equipment (e.g. original mobile phone where it was recorded) must be presented in working condition to be admissible in court as evidence.
Court ke judges aajkl nasha karke faisala dete hai adultry wife ki call recording bnda evidence ki rup mai na de to kya de evidence mai usse bda evidence kya ho skta hai
नशा तो नशा बल्कि सस्ता नाश करके करते हैं फैसला अब देखी निठारी कांड के आरोपियो को बरी कर दिया
Right
Nation does not have any confidence on collegium judges. They have charged fine on lokesh gurjar, just bcoz he spoke truth about judiciary.
Some judge are not capable they are only depends on law. They can't use logic and common sense.
Sahi kaha apne
Right to privacy violation is shouldn't be considered when someone is trying to collect evidence for judiciary cases purposes. Because that is the only way to prove himself innocent.
Right
प्रश्न है 1.लव मैरिज या 2.अरेंज मैरिज
उपाय= no marriage
प्रॉब्लम सॉल्व
By the same logic CCTV or mobile recording video of a person without permission is also a civil offense.
I personally believe Phone recordings should be legally accepted as evidence. Because nobody does call recording routinely . Call recording is carried out by someone when there is an anticipation of a specific kind of crime likely taking place or to prevent oneself from becoming a scapegoat in a particular case. Violation of privacy should be given preference only after evaluating the merit of the call recording. Maybe the evidence can prevent an innocent person from being wrongly punished. I believe that the people speak in the true sense and exactly what they mean on the phone. A call recording is always chosen by a person who is defending the case and has no other option left.
I am with your opinion.
The same right to privacy can be misused, if someone falsely claims that blackmail is done via phone call, but he has no proof because he couldn't record due to right to privacy issue. 😅
How is it a violation of privacy? Here the conversation is between two persons. One has recorded the conversation, unless it is brought to notice of a third person the privacy does not get violated. Before the conversation is produced before a court the permission has been sought. So there is no violation of privacy. Does right to privacy superceed right to justice.
घूस लेते सरकारी कर्मचारियों की vedio उनकी बिना permission बनाना भी privacy का उल्लंघन है l😂
Mere hisab se public servent job apni seat pe hota hai, to waha kuch bhi private nhi hota, wo public ki seva ke liye baitha hai waha
@@Amit01649ye to wahi baat ho gyi aap dusre ke Ghar me ghus ke uske upar hi right to privacy ka aligation laga dete ho kyuki uske Ghar me cctv laga hai 😂😂😂
Wife is like an open book for her husband so that husband can record call,make videos and should be admitted in court also bcoz there is no privacy between husband wife. also recording may be an important evidence of the case so it should be accepted by court and may be listen by the judge in presence of only husband and wife in his chamber.
जजो को अब ज्यादा पढ़ाई करने की जरूरत है एक तरफा फैसला गलत है,यही तो अन्याय है।
Let’s talk about case other than call recording. In an argument between two persons if a person records face to face argument will it tantamount infringement of privacy and not admissible as evidence in court of law. Please elaborate.
If husband was giving proof then at least court should have heard it. How can they deny proof? Sorry state of justice.
And what about video recordings in public places?
It is not a crime to record any illegal activity on phone or camera.
If you are recording someone's private activities without their permission which is not illegal then it is wrong.
how these people manage to became judges.
If someone is constantly threatening you over telephone, should you request him or her to allow recording its voice and do you expect he will say, ok.
And on the other hand if the govt. or any telecom authorities hold the right to record the conversations of their citizens or clients then why we the citizen of Bharat won't have the right to record the same for their own safety and security.
How can it be proven if any criminal commits a crime or give random threat over phone, how can it be proven before the Honourable Court?
If recording done for good cause = court should accept it, but if recording done & using for wrong purpose = It should be amount to illegal act, according to me
I don't think if something that can't be used as an evidence in court does not mean it can be deemed as illegal.
🎉🎉 मैंडम जानकारी देने के लिए बहुत -बहुत बधाई -भीष्मदेव महतो, अध्यक्ष सह प्रबंध निदेशक ग्रीन फील्ड इंडिया और भारत निर्माण सेवक।
So if I record someone shooting other people, the honorable court will say it is under the right to privacy and you can't provide it as proof. I think it's really dumb that instead of checking that proof, the court nullified it. They could have put a penalty on him but noooo. They gave a dumb order.
😂tumko usse permission Leni pdegi bhai 😂
Ki me apko katal karte hue record karna chahta hu
😂😂😂😂
Madam aap bilkul sahi kah rahi hain court mein kisi bhi prakar ki recording ka saboot dena kisi ke privacy ke khilaf nahin ho
Pls add case law name in the description. It is very easy to know which case law your talking about.
R malkhani vs state of maharastra 1973
What a childish decision is that?
After this judgement
I remembered this song
.
.
.
Jedah Nasha...Nasha teri akkhan wich aave mennuu
PROBLEM IS WHEN ONE PILLAR THINKS ITSELF SUPERIOR OVER OTHERS & STARTS TAKING THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OTHER PILLARS.
Right to privacy yaha nahi banta bcz he is not distributing unauthorized recordings in public domain neither he has any intention to do so 😊😊😊
I buy only those smartphones which comes with call recording feature without announcement.
Kya bat hai
There is a right to defend yourself . And collection evidence through any possible means for defending yourself in court should be legal. Phone taping can be illegal but if you are moving the court what you have talked is against you should be legal because court wants to know what king of talking has happened between you and the party. How can one understand what you have originally talked with someone.
Then because of right to privacy your finger print should not become evidence . Without consent you cannot collect any suspected criminal's finger print. Five senses are private . So evidence regarding five senses are invalid.
Dare to Express Your Opinion Honorable Arjita Chaturvedi.
💯 % Agreed on your Suggestion Ma'am, Judiciary must think on your advice and do the needful rectification.
It is like taking permission for call recording,, theft rape, corruption, call record after taking permission to preserve right to privacy 😅
इसका मतलब अब कोई भी इंसान किसी के पास call करके गाली गलौच दे सकता है।
और अगर कोई चोर गली में खड़ी गाड़ी चोरी कर रहा है
तो CCTV का सबुत भी अमान्य होना चाहिए
क्योंकि इससे चोर की privacy खत्म हो सकती है 😅
गजब के टोपीबाज जज बनें हुए हैं यार 🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂
Aap ka kahna bilkul sahi hai mam. Aysi koi bhi baate accused chhip kar hi karta/bolta hai. To uska evidences collection chhip kar hi kiya jaa sakta hai. Saamne se to koi bhi nahin kahega/batayega ki haan hum ne..... aur saamne se evidences collect kar bhi nahin sakta koi Q ki mauka hi nahin milega/dega. Ab evidence, evidences hi hota hai. The main goal is to have a perfect judgement bas. Agar us chhipe evidences ko accused ne except kar liya court mein to fir court kya kahega us samay, Q ki ye evidences bina uske permission ke liya gaya, uske privacy ka hanan hai isliye main faysla ulta dunga matlab evidences ki kamin nikaal de....! . Ye to koi baat nahin hui ? Judge ko bhi malum ho jaata hai ki kahani kya hai magar Q ki kanun mein aysa isliye faysla bhi waysa ? Fir justice ka matlab kya rah jaayega ? Court ek sahi judgement ke liye hai chahe evidences kahin se bhi kisi tarah laaya gaya ho bas evidences pakka aur sahi hona chahiye. Ek baar judge saab sune to, poochhe to accused se ki haan bhai batao ki kya tumne......Tabhi to sahi justice ho paayega warna to court bhi sab kuch jaante/samajhte hue bhi.....
Koi bhi case court mein aata hai to table par paper put hote hi judge saab us case ke baare bahut kuch samajh lete honge ki ye case kya hai aur decision kya ho sakta hai. Wo baat alag hai ki beech mein agar case ka rukh dusre taraf jaane lage to.....aur wakeel saab to shuru mein hi poora kahani sunte hi samajh lete honge ki case kya hai. Q ki roj to un logon ko kitne cases se gujarna padta hoga. Unka tajurba hi case ko pahle hi samajh leta hoga ki is case mein galti-sahi kis-kis ka ho sakta hai.
I believe it should be allowed..Husband shown this evidence for his self-defence not selling in the market. He is part of the recording and both are included. Do you believe if he could say that I am doing recording...please wait and speak ...
India का कानुन हि अलग हे. यहा जो गलत काम करता हे उसकोही कानुन suport करता हे. ओर जिसके साथ गलत हुआ हे उसको हर तरहकी तकलीफ दि जाती हे.👍
Inshort, बिना परमिशन के किसी अपराध का सबूत इखट्टा करना अपराध है।
IT will helpful for us if you mention whether the husband party was made appeal to SC? If so, what was the Outcome?
ऐसे मे CCTV कैमरा भी गैर कानूनी हैं😂😂😂😂😂
Right
Correct 😂
Exam me CCTV nahi rakhna chahiye 😂
RTP मै भी कुछ प्रावधान की जरूरत है.
Valid point man😅😂
Great Session Ma'am 🙏🙏
Judges ki accountability decide honi chahiye 😢
We support lokesh gurjar ji and his truth on which corrupt collegium judges have charged fine.
Essence- Right to privacy wins over right to justice
11:45 It is neither Legal nor Illegal, no law for call recording. But can be sued as violation of right to privacy. You're welcome.
I m recording our conversation.
Ok, I won't say anything incriminating. Thank you for alerting me.
देश में बिना permission के फोटो खीचकर उसे पोर्न साइट्स तक पे अपलोड कर देते है असामाजिक तत्व। और। आप लोग कॉल रिकॉर्डिंग की बात करते हो।
मैं डरता था सरकारी अफसरों को, वकीलो, जज साहब, नेताओ को, फोन पर गाली देने से मैम ने सब डर दूर कर दिया। 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Then CCTV in Railway station, Street, Hospital everywhere is illegal under Article 21 😅😅😂 what a High Court but Supreme Court is good .
The Indian Penal Code authorises every citizen to defend himself against any criminal act perpetrated again him. Call recording is a material evidence and for gathering evidence against any criminal adventure is not a crime. When a person speaks in phone the place where communication is transmitted is public domain and all public domain has public interest and public rights.
Call recording legal होना चाहिए अपने phone से recording करने पर, chhattisgarh high court का बकवास डिसीजन ।
How they are allowing installation of cc cameras which basically records private behavior and how the police is allowed to present such recording as evidence in court?
हमारीJudiciary समय समय पर ऐसे हास्यास्पद फैसले देती रहती है😉😉😉
एक इंसान की जिंदगी तबाह हो जाती है और इनको पड़ी है Right to privacy 😉😉😉😉
E jaj desh me atank karana chahata he
Ha sehi kaha ma'am. Rules k likhaf jane k liye alagse punishment de sakta hai. But as a evidence it should be acceptable.
Court would have allowed it if role was reversed. They will go to any extent to protect abla nari!!
the Court decision is right...right to Privacy must be above all......
My question is who will willingly allow to record the statements when you are in trouble or having court case .
Everyone speaks their mind clearly good or bad when they feel comfortable to share their input .
Next , everyone is scared to get tangled into court proceedings as witnesses due to long years of harassment faced . Truth tends to die fast when compared to liars .
So only way left is to record the conversation silently.
Generally it is illegal but if there is case for adultery against it must be legal, Indians have judicious character, only in caste- based, sex-based judgements, they are experts.
Indian court me jana means torture hona, life destroy means indian court.
Kripya aapko apne dress pe dhyan Dena chahiye. Because you are a teacher
😊
fir to sare cctv camere bhi hta dene chahiye criminals ki bhi to right to privacy hogi.
😂😂😂😂😂
Excellent... And I completely agree with your view.. and you have made is very simple to understand...
Primary object of our judiciary system not to give justice & equality to men against women,,,,
Waaa re mere desh ke kanunn👎👎👎👎
Laws accepted only because its law without its pros and cons is unacceptable with due unrespect for the judiciary particularly in this case.
Judiciary is the reason why men's don't want to marry 😢
Maim aap Jo bol rahi h wo sahi h Mera bhi wahi kahna h ki Jo aapki bat Sach h ❤🙏🏼 thanks maim
Judge is sold out 😂😂
Can you imaging if a person is being bullied or threatened He /She cant use that recorded phone call
Injustice against men will only increase crime against women. There should be some provisions in law to punish these cheap women who misuse law otherwise only hate against women in general will increase resulting in offense.
Do Police for Traffic light CCTV, Malls or Restaurants take permission before recording and presenting to the Court in case of an offence?
जजों को लोग मानते हैं की बहुत बुद्धिमान हैं लेकिन फैसले बेवकूफों जैसे होते हैं कोई आपको जान की धमकी देता उससे परमिशन लेंगे? पत्नी पति को छोड़ दूसरे के साथ सुहाग रात मनाये तो अपराध नहीं?
It means kidnapper call for ransom against kidnapped person is legal as per Indian law if recorded without permission of kidnapper. Judge give new business idea, sabka saath sabka vikas.
I think judge eager to make this decision to be legalized his settings behind the court with criminals against their crime on call,
Too much wrong interpretation of right to privacy...who will allow to record his wrongfull act..😂😂Just think on the ground level implementation of this judgement...
if two persons are talking on phone and third person is recording that is breach of privacy, when two persons are talking and one of them is recording its should not be a breach of privacy.
Judges should allow this call recording as an evidence to produce either by wife or husband as this is not right to privacy....it is absolutely fine as the argument is between the husband and wife...yes it could be illegal or right to privacy if an outsider or anu any other member records without the consent of the both..
Court is open for the culprits' rescue.
Wow. 😀. Right to privacy. If a husband murders his wife then it is also right to privacy. The Law should not involve on it. Aisa hoga kya kuch din baad... Cc tv camera is also illegal according to right to privacy.....
That is why I always tell that I am recording all even if I am not 😊
Evidence kaha se layega koi .judge apne hi masti me magan hai
You are Right call recording should be listen by court. It will help them in taking right judgement.