CLEAR WINNER!! TaylorMade P790 v’s Ping i530

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 окт 2024
  • #matthewgalleygolf #golf #golfclub
    This week I compare two of the leading hollow body irons in the form of the TaylorMade P790 against the Ping i530. These are both an ‘all round’ iron where manufacturers aim to combine distance and forgiveness with looks and feel.
    I compare distance, spin, launch, ball speed and much more using a TrackMan 4.
    Enjoy the watch, like and subscribe if you are enjoying the content!
    SUBSCRIBE - / @matthewgalleygolf
    ONLINE COACHING: skillest.com/a...
    Use Code: MATT25 for 25% off
    Watch this next:
    1. TaylorMade QI Iron - FULL REVIEW
    • TaylorMade QI Iron - F...
    2. Ping have done it again! i530 Review
    • Ping have done it agai...
    #matthewgalleygolf #golf #clubreviews
    Instagram: @matthewgalleygolf
    Twitter: @MGalleyPGAPro
    Facebook: Matthew Galley Golf
    Website: www.matthewgalleygolf.co.uk
    Email: matthewgalleygolf@gmail.com

Комментарии • 45

  • @Golfzilla70
    @Golfzilla70 Месяц назад +4

    Great review, but i seem to be coming to a different conclusion from these results--- it looks to me like the Ping club was the clear winner of the two in consistent distance control. The offline business could come down to shaft, or the fact that the Ping is stronger lofted (basically hitting one club stronger, in comparison). Either way, distance control with an iron is a game-changer for most people, although it's not talked about nearly as much as spin is. Having a rocket launcher that gets consistent results all across the face is some seriouis tech. Just my humble opinion.

  • @Teamtimp88
    @Teamtimp88 6 месяцев назад +14

    Would love to see the spin rates with an 8 iron (i530), guessing same spin as the P790 7 iron…same same, would rather hit an eight into the green as opposed to a seven iron

  • @leeloopatsy
    @leeloopatsy 6 месяцев назад +11

    For me the most important thing is control and trajectory with as little dispersion as possible. The distance is a plus. But provided you can control it, if the balls go all over the place then it is of no interest. Besides, going 150 yards with a 9 iron or a 7 or a 5 is of no importance. What matters is to know which iron you must use to be able to cover this distance and have balls that are always more or less in the middle of the fairway and/or green. This is why I chose the retro loft i530.

  • @robertshields6214
    @robertshields6214 6 месяцев назад +8

    Cant this all be attributed to the stronger loft in the Ping?

  • @ewheel1629
    @ewheel1629 7 дней назад

    You sound a little biased towards Taylormade if you like Taylormade better as a product that’s OK but for me, there’s not a clear winner because of different lofts ….ping had the obvious distance advantage and forgiveness…

  • @atamagashock
    @atamagashock 5 месяцев назад +4

    These comparisons should be done with the same loft. I’d like to see the difference in spin and distance if they both played at 30.5. I think they would play a lot closer. I’m personally not a fan of all these sets with such strong lofts. At 29 degrees that’s a 6 iron not a 7. So that alone changes the numbers. You should see more distance, lower spin numbers, less height.
    I’m going on Sunday for an iron fitting and I’m looking into the players distance category. But I’ve played a 33 degree 7 iron for so long now, I’m just used to it. I don’t mind a slightly stronger lofted 7, but the 790s 30.5 is sbout as strong as I’d want. Really I’m hoping to go 1 or 2 degrees weak, but I guess we will see how it all plays out on Sunday.

  • @Skye_the_toller
    @Skye_the_toller 6 месяцев назад +4

    I had the p790.. I liked it, but the gap was quite difficult to adjust… if the Ping are longer… it will be worst!!! I still like my I230… one + club shorter, but more « predictable » trajectory… consistent.

  • @peterbuzz7279
    @peterbuzz7279 6 месяцев назад +4

    Interesting outcome, wasn't expecting the one club difference in distance with the ping.
    I would still prefer to be hitting the ping 8 iron instead of the P790 7 iron.

  • @nataliedeyton6829
    @nataliedeyton6829 6 месяцев назад +6

    I was fitted last weekend and the i530 and the ZX4 I hit great .. both were absolutely the same for me .. went with the pings but it was a personal preference

  • @bobbygoodman2875
    @bobbygoodman2875 6 месяцев назад +10

    I believe you can get the Pings in retro-spec (more loft).

  • @rickylee3161
    @rickylee3161 6 месяцев назад +2

    Genuinely surprised such difference with the distance. I played the i525 and it’s never the longest.

  • @waywardwest
    @waywardwest 4 месяца назад +1

    I would take the i530 with retro lofts. The number on the club is irrelevant. Ping has always produced clubs with consistent yardage gaps between clubs. As a lower handicap player I want to know I have a bag of clubs that cover all the yardages not the irons I can brag about hitting my 7 iron 190 yards.

    • @MatthewGalleyGolf
      @MatthewGalleyGolf  4 месяца назад +1

      They are so good and retro lofts would help gap the wedges

  • @joeclaman9186
    @joeclaman9186 4 месяца назад +1

    How much impact to spin and land angle do you get with retro loft?

  • @paulmcgee1867
    @paulmcgee1867 6 месяцев назад +1

    Both could be said to have won. It all depends on what the expectations are

  • @OSS976
    @OSS976 5 месяцев назад +1

    “Clear winner” … proceeds to say he likes TM more but it depends lol

    • @MatthewGalleyGolf
      @MatthewGalleyGolf  5 месяцев назад

      Better for my game but if you want more distance then Ping is the answer 🔥

  • @CatNash007
    @CatNash007 5 месяцев назад +1

    The retro spec loft for the Ping would have been more of an apples to apples comparison.

  • @thatwilldonicely1314
    @thatwilldonicely1314 5 месяцев назад +1

    hi im a 18 handicapper, could i play with those pings ? or are they to 'difficult' for me? cheers

    • @MatthewGalleyGolf
      @MatthewGalleyGolf  5 месяцев назад

      More than likely they’ll be forgiving enough but you need to try them. G430 will offer you more forgiveness in Ping range

  • @Golfzilla5000
    @Golfzilla5000 2 месяца назад

    it is fascinating on how to interpret the dispersion --- the Ping seems to have a wider horizontal dispersion, while the P790 seems to have a larger vertical dispersion. If you've got trouble in front of or behind the hole, then the Ping is the proper club. But if the trouble is to the sides, then the P790 is the club. In my experience, usually the danger is either right in front of you or if you go too long. Of course there's always going to be exceptions, but usually it's problematic if you're long or short more so than left or right (on approach shots, which is where the irons will shine or not).
    It'll be Ping for me. I currently play Ping's iBlades, but the next set i get will definitely be looking at these i530's very closely. And i need some help with distance now that i'm in my 50's 😀

  • @edbardoe2195
    @edbardoe2195 2 месяца назад

    No casual player should waste money for either, glad you can hit that dime sized sweet spot!

  • @CatNash007
    @CatNash007 5 месяцев назад

    Standard loft of i530 is same as Power Spec of i525…jacked!

  • @LeslieGreenwood-bu9tn
    @LeslieGreenwood-bu9tn 6 месяцев назад

    I went with PXG 0311 P because looks , sound , feel , sensible distance , gerat spin numbers & the front to back dispersion is the best I've ever had, oh & the TT elevate shafts.

  • @MrRvrrat1959
    @MrRvrrat1959 23 дня назад

    No descent angles mentioned??

  • @JOSEGPH2018
    @JOSEGPH2018 5 месяцев назад

    Distance only with the driver, te rest must to be focused on controll.
    The number is only to now what club to choice each time.

  • @DonAl9114
    @DonAl9114 2 месяца назад

    I do play the P 790. And if I hit them well the ball really flies well. Not sure if we average golfer really feel a difference between the two brands , unless the lift is different. There are plenty of really good golf clubs on the market available. 😊😊😊

    • @MatthewGalleyGolf
      @MatthewGalleyGolf  2 месяца назад

      P790 are a great iron and as good as anything in this category 👍🏻

  • @nachanokr9198
    @nachanokr9198 5 месяцев назад

    your Ping I530 data from the club own reviewed and this comparison is way different. In your Ping I 530 review 7 iron spin rate was average 5600 here is 4400. Wonder why such a big gap in the same iron.

    • @MatthewGalleyGolf
      @MatthewGalleyGolf  5 месяцев назад

      A combination of ‘human’ element and nature of the club

  • @2tcreative
    @2tcreative 4 месяца назад

    Where you are hitting a 7 iron with the P790 you would drop down a club (8 iron?) with the i530, which might bring the spin rate more in line with what you want. Distance withe the i530 8 iron might even be slightly longer if those numbers hold up. Was this the power spec or traditional?

    • @MatthewGalleyGolf
      @MatthewGalleyGolf  4 месяца назад

      These were standard lofts, yes launch and spin would increase with 8 iron and distance would drop, but most likely still a little longer that P790 8 iron

  • @JOSEGPH2018
    @JOSEGPH2018 5 месяцев назад +2

    The choice is , distance the Ping, controll the Taylor.
    Easy !! 😂

  • @Grunt21Tennessee
    @Grunt21Tennessee 6 месяцев назад +1

    Great review!

  • @ratbastard4443
    @ratbastard4443 5 месяцев назад +2

    Just curious, Were you using the same shaft for both of these??

  • @chrisb.4496
    @chrisb.4496 4 месяца назад

    In the search for distance, companies and new golfers have actually backed themselves into a corner...

  • @dickbroomer7877
    @dickbroomer7877 5 месяцев назад

    Hi Matt nice review👍 a couple of questions Didn’t hear you mention the lofts are they the same? (& what lofts are they) I think you can get the Ping in std, retro, & power lofts, if this is so you could get the Pings 2deg weaker lofted (just a suggestion), which would increase the spin , great ball striking Matt, can you give us a bit more info on feel and sound and ball control (shot shaping) Thanks Dickey 9hcp 76year senior golfer

    • @MatthewGalleyGolf
      @MatthewGalleyGolf  5 месяцев назад +1

      Hi Dickie,
      The i530’s are 1.5 degrees stronger and yes higher/weaker lofts will increase spin. I prefer the feel and sound of the P790’s, shot shaping easier with P790’s