NOT very accurate. The medieval Europeans all have brown eyes and the sultan has blue eyes and light skin. This is more like an episode of STAR TREK than a historical epic. The costumes are clearly made of plastic.
@@MrMarek19they played no card the only problem was weather those who conquered the world Europe was nothing for them but the harsh weather of Europe didn't let them stay for long and trust me while the king of Austria was hiding like a rat they were conquering his empire
Not really any different. Maybe parts of Austria could be held by the Ottomans for awhile. If somehow they continued, they would been forced to face the Hapsburgs more directly and that would have stopped them.
@@ZeeshanStates-ww7suDoubtful. Unless the Ottomans made some military technology breakthrough. In the Ottoman-Russo wars fought when Catherine the Great ruled, Ottomans always outnumbered the Russians yet they lost everytime
The Europeans lost many wars with the Ottomans because they had some lame-brained ideas about chivalrous battle. Rather than fight in organized formations, they wore absurdly heavy personal armor and tried to fight one-on-one. Eventually they learned some strategy and did rather better. Some these costumes appear to be Spanish and some are Italian An odd mix.
One-on-one? Up untill the 1700s the Ottomans almost never had a single battle against a single state in Europe, but against a coalition of at least 3-4 kingdoms. Basically Ottomans against whole Europe. Example: Batlle of Niğbolu (Nicopolis), Battle of Kosovo, Battle of Varna, Battle of Mohacs and countless others.
Austria beat the Turks again and again. And the Turks lost the greatest sea battle near Lapanto against the Christian fleet headed by the Young John of Austria.
Yeah, by not showing up. Austrians are very smart they would be deleted from the map if they did. Instead of that, they accepted the greatness of Süleyman and accepted the Ottoman Sultan as the superior and only emperor in the world for a long time.
@@MirlivaAliPasaummmm no? That’s not what happens as much as I hate both austria and the ottomans combined, the Christian coalitions beat the Ottomans consistently after the 15th century, why do you think the Turks are not in the balkans anymore?
@@Norm-is-normalThats upto the Turks when they make up their mind and take Balkans. I mean when they wanted constantinople they took it. Its upto them, if they consider Balkan they might just show up in midnight. Don't you agree?
@@MirlivaAliPasa Tell me you are a Turkish nationalists without telling me ur a turkish natinalist. Jokes aside Your sultan lost to prince eugene 3 of savoy and leopold led Austria if not for the French louis, A CHRISTAN, the ottomans wouldve been kicked out of europe long ago, even with possibly the most poweful french king with them, they failed and lost land, watch the documentaries of history marche u will see the truth, the austrians were more valliant then u think
@@Jyestha-v2i I dont comment about history without original documents unlike your fairy tales. Just go ahead and read the treaty of Istanbul from 1533. Maybe then you will have an idea how desperately the greatest ruler of western Europe accepted the greatness of the one and only Emperor of that time. People often make the mistake of thinking the western world has always been superior in terms of military and economic power, whereas it is only the case for the last 2,5-3 centuries.
Cool! You're re-uploading the historically accurate clip of the Magnificent Century
NOT very accurate. The medieval Europeans all have brown eyes and the sultan has blue eyes and light skin. This is more like an episode of STAR TREK than a historical epic. The costumes are clearly made of plastic.
Austria was paying heavy tax to ottoman, to avoid further atack
Austria was never fully invaded 😅
It actually was, but they simply failed to
@@WhatIFNaruto123We did not succeed, but not because of the failed power of europe, but because winter came early.
@@kemalsaban8926 they play that card .......they were not so stupid but they would be stopped any way in europe.....believe me
@@MrMarek19they played no card the only problem was weather those who conquered the world Europe was nothing for them but the harsh weather of Europe didn't let them stay for long and trust me while the king of Austria was hiding like a rat they were conquering his empire
@@MrMarek19 suleiman was smart to properly retreat in winter not dumb like napoleon who couldn't retreat properly .
Suleiman is better tactician
If Viena would fall in 1529, what would be the history of Europe???
We would have not become so weak and empire would have won some more russo turkish war
No different from todays europe.
Not really any different. Maybe parts of Austria could be held by the Ottomans for awhile. If somehow they continued, they would been forced to face the Hapsburgs more directly and that would have stopped them.
@@ZeeshanStates-ww7suDoubtful. Unless the Ottomans made some military technology breakthrough. In the Ottoman-Russo wars fought when Catherine the Great ruled, Ottomans always outnumbered the Russians yet they lost everytime
In 1529 they had enough momentum to keep Vienna but not in 1689. @@EyesOfFrozenMeat
The Europeans lost many wars with the Ottomans because they had some lame-brained ideas about chivalrous battle. Rather than fight in organized formations, they wore absurdly heavy personal armor and tried to fight one-on-one.
Eventually they learned some strategy and did rather better.
Some these costumes appear to be Spanish and some are Italian An odd mix.
One-on-one? Up untill the 1700s the Ottomans almost never had a single battle against a single state in Europe, but against a coalition of at least 3-4 kingdoms. Basically Ottomans against whole Europe. Example: Batlle of Niğbolu (Nicopolis), Battle of Kosovo, Battle of Varna, Battle of Mohacs and countless others.
Austria beat the Turks again and again. And the Turks lost the greatest sea battle near Lapanto against the Christian fleet headed by the Young John of Austria.
Yeah, by not showing up. Austrians are very smart they would be deleted from the map if they did. Instead of that, they accepted the greatness of Süleyman and accepted the Ottoman Sultan as the superior and only emperor in the world for a long time.
@@MirlivaAliPasaummmm no? That’s not what happens as much as I hate both austria and the ottomans combined, the Christian coalitions beat the Ottomans consistently after the 15th century, why do you think the Turks are not in the balkans anymore?
@@Norm-is-normalThats upto the Turks when they make up their mind and take Balkans. I mean when they wanted constantinople they took it. Its upto them, if they consider Balkan they might just show up in midnight. Don't you agree?
@@MirlivaAliPasa Tell me you are a Turkish nationalists without telling me ur a turkish natinalist. Jokes aside
Your sultan lost to prince eugene 3 of savoy and leopold led Austria if not for the French louis, A CHRISTAN, the ottomans wouldve been kicked out of europe long ago, even with possibly the most poweful french king with them, they failed and lost land, watch the documentaries of history marche u will see the truth, the austrians were more valliant then u think
@@Jyestha-v2i I dont comment about history without original documents unlike your fairy tales. Just go ahead and read the treaty of Istanbul from 1533. Maybe then you will have an idea how desperately the greatest ruler of western Europe accepted the greatness of the one and only Emperor of that time.
People often make the mistake of thinking the western world has always been superior in terms of military and economic power, whereas it is only the case for the last 2,5-3 centuries.
Austrian emperor acknowledged Suleiman as his father 🤣
It’s a riot to watch the noble men clapping for Charles-they clap like little girls!
Tf is France doing? They really switching sides. Anything for Italy😂😂😂 😂😂😂😂😂😂
france is doing amogus tactics
Prašivý pes.
🇹🇷👍
Слава Султану Сулейману 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
Thank God for the Poles.